Added: 2 years ago
From: robimiglio
Views: 8,190
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • what does quad version stand for?

    

  • Original Better No Question!!!

  • Ah yes, I far prefer the quad version to the original, unfortunately. I just feel it flows smoother and more appropriately shows the emotion behind the lyrics.

  • top master esse som!

  • bass line stands out

    

  • Ouch! This was a bad idea. Ian's just on the edge of his vocal range, somebody wanted his voice to be higher[?], sorry, LUV Tull but I will not be purchasing the quad album!

    certified Tull OCD since 1969

  • Worst on the album and I am a Tull freak

  • I have always loved the quad version of this beautiful song

  • Amen!

    Religion will either save or destroy all of us.

  • @ThePeaceis Chances of it doing the former are virtually non-existent

  • A little faulty sound but a bad ass song and message...

  • bei tempi quando ascoltavo questo pezzo.....BELLISSIMO!!!

  • Comment removed

  • Okay, the guitar solo is better than the stereo version but I do not like the transposed pitch the looser vocals or the faster tempo. But thank you for posting this! Now I won't wonder if I would like this version better. Wind up is my favorite Tull song.

  • Cannot wait to hear this on quad Wpw

    Amptjer Anglo Saxon Sprirtual frmo the iconoclast

    Tom from Utica

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more