@mrnormalnormal it would be no useful becdause you already can't see the pixels on the current actual 326 dpi retina display so why would you need a higher resolution....only at tvs and monitors we need higher resolution. I want a 42 inch ULTRA HD tv with 220 hz response time to set it as my monitor :)
dumb ass its 152'' not 142'' 0:10
BrutalGamez 1 day ago
oh panasonic you so crazy
ISHYGDDT2013 5 days ago
i need one for my shoe closet.
dahman511 1 month ago
Now i Just need a bigger house to put this in.
LS1NV 2 months ago
hope this tech on 2012 plasma range im saving up for 65 inch
mancsakacarl 2 months ago
152 not 142
EuropejskaUnia 3 months ago 2
is that supposed to show you the next dimension?
LOL
SirGecko01 3 months ago
152" you mean. :)
minipullin 3 months ago
Where is this at?
OriginalMrA 3 months ago
MOOOOAAAARRRR!!!!
X3n0nFr33k 3 months ago
I want to know how many Gigabytes 90~120 minutes of video in this resolution...
Imagine that:
"Starting download from Ultra-HD xxxxx movie" - (remaining 999999weeks)
2006goto 4 months ago
@2006goto terabytes upon terabytes
LegendaryProx 3 weeks ago
@LegendaryProx LOL... A BluRay Movie with it's full quality is about 30~60gb... And it is 1080p only... 4k resolution, I can't even imagine..
2006goto 3 weeks ago
@2006goto only 4,26x More Data = 128~256GB ^^
SapphireHD5850Xtreme 1 week ago
3Dじゃないのにそう見える・・・すごいね!
TheOzisan 4 months ago
it says 152 inch on the wall lol
dracoRDK 10 months ago
the video on the tv was probably shot on a redone/ some other 4k capable camera or is completely CGI
dannyleeg 10 months ago
Hoooooooooooooooooooooooly Shit
DEADLIKE4EVER 1 year ago
why does it say 152" on the top of the TV if you said that its 142 ??!??!!
pinkforever1996 1 year ago
in 10 years my ipod will have 4k too
mrnormalnormal 1 year ago 44
@mrnormalnormal Then it would be named an Icar for transporting the huge display. Lol
officialpixelstudios 1 year ago
@mrnormalnormal
forget about it...
even not full hd..
ArtaniakaMafi 10 months ago
@mrnormalnormal in 10 years there like be 12k lol
TheDiscipleOfHell 9 months ago
@TheDiscipleOfHell in 10 years??? we already have 8k.... in 1 year we have 12k
Xahni13 7 months ago
@mrnormalnormal it would be no useful becdause you already can't see the pixels on the current actual 326 dpi retina display so why would you need a higher resolution....only at tvs and monitors we need higher resolution. I want a 42 inch ULTRA HD tv with 220 hz response time to set it as my monitor :)
PRINCEofPECICA 6 months ago
@PRINCEofPECICA i see pixels on my ipod 4g
mrnormalnormal 6 months ago
Soon everything will be so High-Definition that it will burn right in to our retinas
ThreeCatsScratching 1 year ago 45
@ThreeCatsScratching These Tv's will not be affordable for the next 3 or 4 years..
First we need a Tv that use less electricity with the same principle what you see in the Ultra HD tv's.
Zoza15 9 months ago
@Zoza15 My dad bought one 3 days ago...
SiKHxSKiLZ 8 months ago
@SiKHxSKiLZ Thats good for you, until the solution of less electricity and same result is taking over rather than eating electricity HD TV's.
Zoza15 8 months ago
I think you have to see it for yourself:P and not in 720p on youtube:)
MOLAMA973 1 year ago
you obviously need to see it in person to get a real effect of how great the picture is
Taureg96 1 year ago
WoW impressive o.o
alienorox 1 year ago
142" or 152" ?
o0PhysX0o 1 year ago
@o0PhysX0o
152"
links oben am rand stehts doch.....
Paralexus 1 year ago