Loved the video, but have a question... Are there any positive and/or negative G's during any of these maneuvers? And what loads would normally gyros take without braking them (and yourself) into dust?
Also, even though it looks simple and cheap, I'd think twice before building, let alone flying one (and I'm a student pilot and work on aircraft maintenance). There's a lot of things to be mindful of (i.e. Power Push Over) that can kill you just like that if you don't know what you're doing...
Lots of question :-). First of all, no, there were no low-G moments in this clip. This must be avoided at all cost, as you probably know. In Germany the gyroplanes have to withstand 3g at MTOW. If you like to build one yourself, best adhere to a proven plan. Take good care that the model has center line of thrust, that should avoid PPO. Contact PRA dot org to get more information one hte whats and hows or the rotary wing forum (links are not allowed here).
This particular machine costs about 55 000 Euros. It uses 14 litres per hour on average. If you are a proficient craftsmen and your home-country allows for experimental aircraft, this may become a lot less.
I think you'll know, since you're from germany, too but that's for others:
In germany you can create your own aircraft, but you have to let it being tested. The test is really hard and normally, your aircraft will not get approved.
That is a nice regulation, if you ask me... You are flying, not driving!
Yndostrui, the German legislation is very strict. But there are many countries more lax about it. In particular if you build your own, the certification process is often quite simple.
I guess, you are in trouble. Actually you can land solely with trim, if you are an expert. I am not mastering that, yet. So most probably I'd get hurt.
Yes, the stickshake is quite bad, but much better with a passenger or when going slower. There seems to be only one good load/speed setting which varies from one machine to the next. The shake during the pedal turn is unavoidable, because the rotor is chopping through the disturbed air from the prop in the autorotation descent.
Yes it seems to be inherent on the MT03's one of the guys who I fly with is an instructor examiner/ Permit inspector and he said that they all shake in different parts of the flight envelope. An RAF 2000 with the same problem was cured by changing the undersling of the blades, it takes about 6 months here just to get the most simple mod approved it's PAnts! Enjoy
Loved the video, but have a question... Are there any positive and/or negative G's during any of these maneuvers? And what loads would normally gyros take without braking them (and yourself) into dust?
Also, even though it looks simple and cheap, I'd think twice before building, let alone flying one (and I'm a student pilot and work on aircraft maintenance). There's a lot of things to be mindful of (i.e. Power Push Over) that can kill you just like that if you don't know what you're doing...
betmen1 1 year ago
@betmen1
Lots of question :-). First of all, no, there were no low-G moments in this clip. This must be avoided at all cost, as you probably know. In Germany the gyroplanes have to withstand 3g at MTOW. If you like to build one yourself, best adhere to a proven plan. Take good care that the model has center line of thrust, that should avoid PPO. Contact PRA dot org to get more information one hte whats and hows or the rotary wing forum (links are not allowed here).
gyrocopterkai 1 year ago
14 litres ? how far can that carry you usually?
iammdeepak1 2 years ago
Normal speed at this consumption rate would be 110-120 kph. So that is how far you get. Not a fuel-saver:-)
The same motor in a Fascination (other of my videos) can take you 240 km on the same 14 ltrs.
gyrocopterkai 2 years ago
how much does one of these cost .and how expensve is it to maintain? do they drink a lot of gas?
iammdeepak1 2 years ago
This particular machine costs about 55 000 Euros. It uses 14 litres per hour on average. If you are a proficient craftsmen and your home-country allows for experimental aircraft, this may become a lot less.
gyrocopterkai 2 years ago
The problem is: Only a few countries allow that.
But I think it is okay to forbid it...
I think you'll know, since you're from germany, too but that's for others:
In germany you can create your own aircraft, but you have to let it being tested. The test is really hard and normally, your aircraft will not get approved.
That is a nice regulation, if you ask me... You are flying, not driving!
Yndostrui 2 years ago
Yndostrui, the German legislation is very strict. But there are many countries more lax about it. In particular if you build your own, the certification process is often quite simple.
gyrocopterkai 2 years ago
OH. what do you do if the stick comes Off?
adam3176 3 years ago
I guess, you are in trouble. Actually you can land solely with trim, if you are an expert. I am not mastering that, yet. So most probably I'd get hurt.
gyrocopterkai 3 years ago
That stick shake would drive me crazy. Id rather fly a LongEasy.
adam3176 3 years ago
Shakey old stick on such a posh machine! Whats your armlike after a couple of hours? Shaken not stirred Mr Bond! :)
CaptainK007 3 years ago
Yes, the stickshake is quite bad, but much better with a passenger or when going slower. There seems to be only one good load/speed setting which varies from one machine to the next. The shake during the pedal turn is unavoidable, because the rotor is chopping through the disturbed air from the prop in the autorotation descent.
gyrocopterkai 3 years ago
Yes it seems to be inherent on the MT03's one of the guys who I fly with is an instructor examiner/ Permit inspector and he said that they all shake in different parts of the flight envelope. An RAF 2000 with the same problem was cured by changing the undersling of the blades, it takes about 6 months here just to get the most simple mod approved it's PAnts! Enjoy
Regards Steve Campbell Cricket G-BSRL
CaptainK007 3 years ago
Great video,Thanks for sharing.
please keep posting
harv208 3 years ago