There was no "incorrect" or "bad information". The Rothschilds script was identical to all media stations, except in this case one hour too soon.
To broadcast the full "official" reasons for a physically impossible "unexpected event" before it has even happened for the first time in the history of the planet is just a tad more than a "mistake".
That the same script was penned prior to / ignorant of / BST - earlier than March 200 1- , with the full reasons for all "collapses" on 9/11 is clear.
That sounds an awful lot like wishful thinking. "Maybe my best friend goes to my house while I'm at work to help my wife with the chores, maybe my pillow smells like his cologne because he took a nap after helping clean the gutters, maybe that condom in the trash was from me and I don't remember putting it there?
Drip-feeding fake "news" stories will always lead to mistakes when differing time zones are also affected by daylight savings times.
Reuters press released this story - with all media stations - except in this case one hour too soon, indicating the story was pre-scripted prior to BST = before March 2001.
Fake news stories carried by media will always lead to mistakes - particularly where time zone differences are subjected to - and affected by - local daylight savings changes.
That the BBC press released this story coming by drip-feed from Rothschilds "Reuters" agency, has already been admitted by the BBC.
It was not a "mistake". It was the intended press release given by Reuters to all media stations. However, they forgot to check the London studio time zone difference due to BST.
Fake news stories by mass media will always lead to mistakes - particularly where time zone differences are subjected to - and affected by - local daylight savings changes.
That the BBC press released this story coming by drip-feed from Rothschilds "Reuters" agency, has already been admitted by the BBC.
It was not a "mistake". It was the intended press release given by Reuters to all media stations. However, they forgot to check the London studio time zone difference due to BST.
Drip-feeding fake news stories by mass media will always lead to mistakes - particularly where time zone differences are subjected to - and affected by - local daylight savings changes.
That the BBC press released this story coming by drip-feed from Rothschilds "Reuters" agency, has already been admitted by the BBC.
It was not a "mistake". It was the intended press release given by Reuters to all media stations. However, they forgot to check the London studio time zone difference due to BST.
@SubjectRuled BBC says no green screen. Plus you can always tell if it is a green screen. And why would the sun be casting light on her face in the same direction as on the buildings if it were a green screen??
All you need to do to check if this is real or fake is go on the bbc website and see their shitty response/reason for the apparant cock up. they dont have a good explanation
The BBC was so humiliated after this report and they way they reported Dr David Kelley's murder, then went into full propaganda mode. Now they are unrecognizable from CNN. A great many of true journalists were fired the day this story was made public.
So the BBC can show live footage from places like Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq where there is poor signal connection, yet in America where BBC has headquarters, the connection gets "lost".
The BBC press-released 1 hour too soon at London time = Manhattan +5hours, when it should have been +5 +1 (daylight savings time - BST) 20 minutes or so before the "collapse" which they stated had happened "some short time ago".
For such an error to occur, the following deductions may be made:
1) The press release was being drip-fed to all media outlets from a third party.
(It was the only wrong timing for BBC that day.)
2) The press release was pre-scripted prior to the day.
I can't be bothered to research the claim that this was reported before it happened. The fact that building 7 is still standing is because the background is a fake background which BBC reporters use all of the time when they want to look like they are on the front lines.
10 YEARS ON, and I am still meeting "Intelligent" Individuals from many Countries and backgrounds, and They Haven't got a "CLUE" about "Building 7!" This IS The overwhelming POWER the Jewish OWNED/CONTROLLED "WORLD" Media has over The MASSES!! IT'S "TIME WORLD!" To STOP LISTENING TO THE ZIONIST/JEWISH Propaganda TOOL and NO LONGER ACCEPT "THEIR" Intimidating use of Blackmail that ANYONE WHO QUESTIONS "THEM!" IMMEDIATELY Becomes an "ANTI-SEMITIC!" This IS HOW THEY HAVE "SILENCED THE TRUTH/FACTS
I offer two links where it is not accepted the myth of the conspiracy. 100% of the engineering schools reject the myth of the 9 / 11. I have many beyond those below. In the U.S., Canada, Australia, Europe, Brazil and even in communist China. The only benefit in Cuba, Venezuela, Pakistan, Iran and North Korea.
The time span is of relatively little importance as it does not alter the fact that the transmission with live camera shows that the "surprise collapse" of WTC7 was in fact a timed demolition.
All media stations carried the similar-worded report, although nearly all others were correctly timed. - They were therefore being drip-fed reports/ press releases.
For an error to occur in relation to present times (on the day) there had been no connections of the press release to the day in question -
- It had been pre-scripted prior to the day
For such a script to carry fine details/times of the twin towers "collapses" also, then the whole of 9/11 was pre-scripted = CONTROLLED.
They press-released 1 hour too soon at London time = Manhattan +5hours, when it should have been +5 +1 (daylight savings time - BST) 20 minutes or so before the "collapse" which they stated had happened "some short time ago".
For such an error to occur, the following deductions may be made:
1) The press release was being drip-fed to all media outlets from a third party.
(It was the only wrong timing for BBC that day.)
2) The press release was pre-scripted prior to the day.
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. EPHESIANS 6:12
Letters on the bottom of the screen state that the 47 floor tower had collapsed when it was standing in the background. The clip clearly states the tower had collapsed when it was standing in the background. Jane Standley and the film crews clearly ddi not know where Tower 7 was.
@ecologicalguy I see that you've offered and opinion concerning Building 7, so I've got a very specific question for you regarding same. I think it is an important question as the answer has rather significant ramifications. Here it is. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.) Thank you.
If this really is the truth, then we the people have to take respondsibility for our actions of putting those politicians in office whome many are quick to condemn. No one person is going to come out of the sky and save us, we must save ourselves. And the first step it appears is to be honest with ourselves and aknowledge our rolls in our own fate as a people.
This is the most damning evidence that this was a planned event. Nevertheless,the JIDF will rush in to try to make this indisputable truth seem like fiction.
@donsaiditwoud I see that you've offered and opinion concerning Building 7, so I've got a very specific question for you regarding same. I think it is an important question as the answer has rather significant ramifications. Here it is. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.) Thank you.
The inconvenient fact for conspiracy believers is that the firefighters said WTC 7 was unstable and likely to collapse. They even formed a collapse zone around it. It was widely expected to collapse. The BBC reporter evidently got her signals crossed and thought it had already collapsed. Big deal.
What's the alternative - that the BBC was part of the plot? Sure, that just makes a lot of sense. "Hey BBC, we're blowing up WTC 7 so make sure to tell everyone." LOL!
@Born2Flesh - that alleged new video is doctored the perpeTRAITOR needs to be imprisoned - THIS IS THE PROOF OF THE THE MEDIA BS AND DEMOLITION - 9 11 FALSE FLAG ATTACK. JUSTICE IS REQUIRED
+ you can see in the documentary; 102 min that changed america, what there a secret service agent being film in tower 7, and that guy rush the cameraman to get out of the tower, cause they blow the building later on. and that guy from secret service was wearing some funny jews special secret service uniform, and that guy was really suspicious in my opinion. so i guess the secret service & CIA are responsable for 9/11 which could explane why they start are war for oil.
Screen behind her or not, they reported this 20 minutes BEFORE WTC7 collapsed. There is documentation all over the Internet that clearly lists the times of collapse for each building. This report happened at 21:54 GMT, which is 16:54 EST (London is 5 hours ahead). Google the world clock. That means it was 4:54PM in New York. It doesn't matter if they were using some video of an earlier time or not because of that fact. Debunk debunked! Critical thinking really does help.
With reference to a possible green screen or not. She was deffinately standing in front of a real window. Look closely and you'll see the brown frame. She even casts a show onto it, thus disproving the laughable 'debunkers' (yet again) who prettend that it's a green screen.
I am all for it being an inside job, but are you people nuts? She is standing in front of a SCREEN where they add the video in. She is not even in New York. They do this all the time. Reporters stand in front of basically what is a movie, or an older broadcast and pretend she is on the actual scene. Look real close. You can tell it is a screen. Geez. This is why no one listens. These half cocked people do not research it. DEBUNKED.
@pootskins research it mate its all on google and you tube - its very real time to wake up - I saw this a few years back and went through the stages of green screen time lapse etc etc etc etc - it was reprted collapsed on all the channels early its not a blue screen the presenter admits it in a you tube telephone interview. watch it again its a live shot even if it was blue screen which it is not its a live shot - I hope you apologise to all the 'nutters' - oh btw -welcome to the real world.
@kyrieeleison1973 Well maybe one day in the next 30-40 years we'll have access to files which are currently confidential. 9/11 separates itself from the scandals you have mentioned by the sheer scale of it and the numbers needed to carry it out in secret. I don't disagree that there are many psycho's out there ( I have my moments), however I'd like to think that somewhere along the chain of command somebody would have said "hang on guys, this doesn't seem right". Maybe I'm being naive.
I have no idea why they would want to keep anything confidential. If it's the truth, then so what? If it's all a big lie... hmm. Nobody will care in 30-40 years. Those responsible will be long forgotten by then. That's ok, though, keep making excuses for these people. They are laughing all the way to the bank.
it didnt collapse completely until 5:20. part of it did collapse but only some of it. they didnt know it would completely collapse into itself. thats the most they expected it to fall, so they said collapsed. as for the missing footage, do you know how many stations were there reporting? even after that, when they showed him in the studio looking at the screen, it was really glitchy. the missing footage was probably them losing the signal. like how some people couldnt call with their phones.
Lol a screen? Even though it shows the smoke billowing and everything..haha u guys are ignorant as fuck. Play your fucking videogames and watch TV. When this 'New World Order' happens don't say people didn't warn you.
@DidYouJustMakeThatUp Yeah, it's a screen... Because you can clearly see the SUNLIGHT on the left side of her face, left shoulder, and hair... yeah, TV studios love to open their walls to let sunlight inside! Not to mention the sunlight on the buildings in the background. It's a screen alright... It's a screen.
@PimpOfPixels The WMD issue wasn't a lie, it was just a huge mistake. This has since been admitted (begrudgingly). As for a few hundred people remaining silent, this is where we differ. I do not believe for a single second that a few hundred skilled/intelligent Americans would be prepared to commit mass murder against their own people. You must have a remarkably low opinion of humanity and find it impossible to trust anyone other than your immediate family, or perhaps they're in on it too?
@kyrieeleison1973 Whereas I'd refer to Operation Northwoods as an embarrassing hair-brained idea that was never officially authorised, you would probably present it has concrete evidence that the U.S is prepared to murder its own people for the greater good (whatever that is). Seems a bit strange of the military to release these documents only months before going through with a similar plan. Then again if you think they are psychotic enough to blow up the WTC then anything is possible.
What about the Gulf of Tonkin incident, then? Or the Iran-Contra scandal? I'm asking for a little critical thinking here and a little extrapolation. I'm not saying the whole of the U.S. Government was "in" on the plan. However, there is no getting around the fact that there are people out there who may be U.S. citizens but do not care at all about this country, rather they have their own agenda. Actions speak louder than words. Who benefits? Are we all safer now, 10 years later?
I'd also like to ask: Do you think psychopathic personalities do not exist, or that they are only the stuff of sensationalized serial killers splashed all over the evening news? John Wayne Gacy was considered a respectable person and a pillar of the community. That is, until they found all those shallow graves in the crawl space. It is probably a lot more common than we feel comfortable with.
@BiGGraff100 Sounds more plausible than some of the other theories but the first country they invaded was Afghanistan where heroin is the only thing of any value. Just doesn't make any sense in my opinion.
@poddington86 The WMDs were certainly a lie. To think otherwise would be naive beyond belief. Do some more research on that, and when you're gotten to the point where you realize the blatant truth of that situation, we can get back to discussing this situation.
@DidYouJustMakeThatUp If you understand how cameras work, there is a depth of field range which will only keep certain things in focus at certain distances. ie you can focus a camera to only have things 10ft infront of it sharp while everything else will remain blurry. When the camera zooms in, it is using a digital zoom mechanism that enlarges the image. This won't change perspective. If the camera was physically moved 5 feet towards the window, then you would see a change in perspective.
retards. she started off the broadcast by saying reports are very very sketchy. they were told that building 7 was in danger of collapsing and mis interpreted that as the building had already fallen. there were alarms all day in anticipation of the building collapsing because it took massive damage when the twin towers collapsed. nobody on the scene that day was at all surprised that it collapsed. it is a weak piece of so called evidence by conspiracy theorists. smh.
@yuggoof The reporter believes the greenscreen is accurate or knows its obsolete. She can't see the image. Notice that she never turns around - don't curb that into "she's trying to ignore the building." How could you ignore the left side of the TV screen? The whole thing is only an ERROR that was not redacted, since it was likely AIRED ON TIME. ShitheadPlanet conveniently excludes a timestamp, which the entire argument is predicated on! "Before 5:20" is not a time. Only the shot is before 5:20.
Hold the phone when does she directly reference the soloman bldg during the feed. because of of now this looks like an earlier broadcast that was messed with the ticker and the time stamp that is usually prominent on this news channels.
@pookp1 and with or without this video, its moot to more important questions. Don't immediately accept this as evidence, especially while it doesn't matter anyway.
Couldn't that be a green screen behind her with an hours-older video playing? You guys point out Building 7, but miss the left side of the screen is different from the rest of the video. A green screen's role is to act as if its live coverage; they were looking for a useful area for the set piece. If not, the idea is that the CIA notified MI6 ahead of the demolition AND they ran the story too fast AND the reporters are foolish enough to not look behind them. Which is more absurd?
@pookp1 ffs if it was a green screen why would the reporter use it to update and assess the damage as if it was recent and it take more than a few minutes to render green screen footage.
Greenscreen. They found a static stock image of the World Trade Center and rendered smoke on top. That's not exactly new technology. Very convenient to pull off. They masked it right on top of where the towers would be but forgot about WTC7.
this is absolute evidance that it was all an inside job.. you cant get any more conclusive proof than this.. this is the main focus ov what happened that terrouble day. to have prior knoledge of its calapse is solid evidance.. people need to wake up to this.. great upload, i give it the thumbs up.
So the BBC knew about the buildings destruction before it happened? How many people do you think are living with this secret? Do you honestly believe that they'll all go to their graves without telling anyone? This is beyond juvenile.
@poddington86 I agree. There's way more problems with the conspiracy theory than there are with the official account. Not that the official account is perfect, but the people peddling this stuff are really not being critical with their own theory.
@PimpOfPixels Who from within the BBC or US government has come forward and said that they were in on the conspiracy? Its never happened because the idea that thousands of people in the western media and US government conspired to murder 3000 innocent Americans is totally absurd.
@poddington86 Typically, before you get confessions, you have to do an investigation. There never was one. WMDs were a huge lie that led to a million deaths and counting. What's so hard for you to believe that they could keep a few hundred people from turning themselves in for murder.
@poddington86 Well for one thing, they weren't all Americans. About 500 were foreign. And they weren't trying to kill 3000 random civilians, but create a moment that would be etched in people's minds forever, so that they would appear to have a rational reason to enter the Middle East in a stupid and pointless war that has lost so many more lives than were ever lost in the WTC. They were looking for their 'Pearl Harbour moment'.
@DeathByFeathers Ok so you've come up with a motive, now for the execution. Please explain what happened to the planes that went down that day and how no-one within the media, government, military or airplane industry has ever come out and said that "they were in on it". There are millions of scientists and structural engineers out there yet only a miniscule handful of nutty professors have come out and supported your theory. Wonder why that is?
Is it possible that BBC (reporting from across the Atlantic) could have simply named the wrong building. After all, all 7 buildings did collapse. This is hardly a "smoking gun".
Flight 93 was shot down over PA by Major Rick Gibney of the USAF 119th squadron. He received a medal for his heroism. When people found this out, it was explained that he got the medal for flying to Indiana and picking up a big wig and flying him back to DC. His F16 that day had only one seat, his.
Fl 93 was headed for NYC & the WTC 7, when it was shot down. The male anchor in this clip was asked about the on air mistake, said he couldn't remember whether he was on the job that day.
@TheMiguelGrande omg, you retard...it wasn't shot down, it was taken over by the brave men and women who were on the flight. Jesus Christ, ignorant fuck!
Seems to me that the police ought to bring that BBC crew in for questioning. Of all the buildings in the area they seemed to "accidentally" know which building was to collapse.
so none in the room she was in knew what the saloman bro building looked liie? youd think if woprd was received a building hadf collapsed, the media would determine what the building was, where and what it looked like
Silverstein said 'pull it'. Do you know how many weeks, or months it takes to prime a building for demolition? WTC7 came down on the same day. WAKE THE FUCK UP!!!
Do you know how much he made after insuring WTC7 against terrorist attack just a few weeks prior to the event?
this is just insane ! i meen its standing up ! how much evedince is required to push an investigation forward , i know its 10 years late but justice must come through
If only the feed had lasted a few more minutes. Imagine their reaction has a building they say has collapsed then collapses on camera. LOL. That would have been precious.
That theory is even more ridiculous than a controlled demolition. I'd buy the controlled demo way before Dr. Wood's ideas upon which are baseless claims with little evidence to even consider. Many of truthers laugh at her investigation methods.
Phil Haydon or whatever his name is, the guy in this clip told We Are Change UK that he was at the theater on 9/11 lol until they showed him this clip!
I think it was clearly a black joke, designed to tell would be conspirator theorist that those who where really behind 911 can get away with anything they choose to get away with.
If you could be Iapetus the moon,the piercer,wouldn't you just have to do it?you know, just use gravity and the observer effects of the shapers to remove the veil on your dim.BS.Lets grab some test tubes and burn shit.Lets be careful,but lets never stop.Where the FFk are we?Whats this made of? Are you sure?What are we going to do about this?What can we do to win? What the F@ck does that mean.Who is in charge? Why have you never been asked these questions before?You cost more now.I'm just sayin.
I know many if you do not believe the official story, which is fine I guess. It has been my experience with people I have spoken with that they have never read any of the official reports. They get most if not all if their information from either other conspiracy believers, videos and other things. This causes quite a bit of a problem when debating. Most people saw Loose Change and took it as the "gospel". I read the Warren Report first and other "official" documents before I could determine at
This BBC bitch hiding the solomon brothers building behind her head and the BBC Pimp on the other side said it was collapsed. But when she moved her head the Solomon brothers building was exposed !! intact and standing!! She shouldn't have moved her head , that was the blunder!! Never move your head until you finish playing the shot!
The fact that the reporter said he heard earlier on the radio that some people find this to far fetched to believe it could happen while Jane is lost by the signal definitely seems weird. I mean he is looking at Jane and the building in question is behind her and yet he doesn't see it? I think she wasn't even in Manhattan but was in a studio with a green screen behind her to film this fictitious report to help add more conspiracy to the fire. I guess we may never know the truth...sad...
I am starting to wonder if this was a disguised news story mistake to help add to the conspiracy about 9/11 being an inside story. I mean if the story was planned how could they allow this to happen unless it was on purpose. I mean this could be one of many set up stories to throw people off of finding the real truth behind what happened. I am not talking about the official narrative but a little country who has a large influence over American affairs needing to rope America into wars.
@ TheyCallMeMrHappy so by your own admission you say that it's pretty close but not "everyday". Do I buy this guy's crap? You mean that his wife told him to go to the doctor and he wasn't at the restaurant that morning after you agreed that it wasn't everyday? You speak as if you know him personally. So he's an asshole based on these two instances and was involved? How do you come to this conclusion? Remember, the burden of proof is on the person (you) making the claim. I have seen no evidence
I am bit of conspiracy theorist myself. The JFk assignation, NASA, and other headlines, including the most recent that we killed OBL. But I have yet to see much of anything in the way of 9/11 that points to an "inside job". I wanted too. All I have seen is a bunch of speculation, grainy closeups of videos and a lot of other garbage that only the gullible will swallow. No body seems to want to talk about or explain how such an operation was constructed. The next time you hear about a building in
@ MrJkwilliamson the reason I don't give this video and others like it much credibility is because they take a lot out context or in the case of this one, take an obvious "flub" of words and run with it as "evidence" of a conspiracy or that it contains prior knowledge. No one seems to up in arms about the Peter Jennings broadcast in which he mentions collapse of buildings before the event. The video is just another example of hearing what you want to hear to support one's opinion.
Remember IF YOU WANT TO MAKE A BUILDING DIE FAST MAKE IT FROM A POROUS MATERIAL AND STRENGTHEN IT WITH STEAL THAT IS WEAKENED BY WATER . THE RUST INSIDE WILL WEAKEN THE POROUS CONCRETE LIKE A CANCER. THESE BUILDING WERE BUILT TO COMEDOWN PERIOD...
And NASA said WE NEED A SMALL NUKE WAR TO SLOW a MINI ICE AGE and like MAGIC Fukashima happened. It was MAGIC that superheated the clouds just before the quake right? Magic makes things happen here on DIRTBAG. It was MAGIC that paved mans quest to emulate the gods and CONTROL WEATHER. Magic happened on 911 too. Thats why these RUSTY buildings fell. In `91 I was apalled at the amount of rust on the top of the WORLD TRADE CENTER. I couldn`t wait to get down and told people then they were unsafe...
I'm just asking mind you but how do we know that there wasn't some sort of mistake and that they might have been showing an earlier feed instead of a live one?
@surfstev Looking at that video again, that has got to be the stupidest thing I ever said. My brain clearly wasn't working that day. The official story is a fairy tale and there is no reason anybody would have used an old feed claiming it was live. I guess my mind was thinking perhaps she may have been standing in front of a green screen and some idiot was playing an earlier recording in the background, but why would anyone do that and not come clean about it later? Too much devil's advocate!
[ Destruction~Property and Construction~Prosperity ]
Human INTEL~ligence: Encoded Information; i.e., The Sound, The Word, The Sound Bite, The Bit: Yes-No; 0-1.
Imagine: HOW-IN-FORM-ACTION affects the TIMELY ACTIVITIES of those who rely on a dualistic moment of "DISCRIMINATION and DISCRETION" involving SURVIVAL.
I don't think its fair that those of us who don't believe in the "official story" get such a cool nickname such as "Conspiracy Theorist" I think we should give the ones who do believe the "official story" a nickname. I have a couple in mind. Patridiots, Steve Wonderers (because they are blind to truth). Any other suggestions?
Lets see now, these people aired news that had not happened yet, they knew twenty minutes in advance, and yet still some people do not believe that there were people conspiring to create a disaster! who else would have given these idiots this story? maybe bin laden? mossad? al quada? i dont think the bbc is going to listen to them and go ahead with this story! it was someone who has great control over the media, that should shorten the list for the fools who still dont believe
I love how the ones who believe in the official story, call us that don't wacky, and "conspiracy theorist" but yet when a video comes out that supports our side, these people are the ones saying that our videos are fake, and try and find any little proof that we are wrong. Maybe if they did the same thing to the official story that they would see what we all see. That 911 was an inside job. We might not know exactly how , but we know that it wasn't what they said.
@MrJkwilliamson Israeli's pretending to be doing construction planted plastic explosives inside the buildings, burning jet fuel can't melt steel, the steel beams were also Cut.... they needed this to happen because they needed a reason to take over every Muslim Government for israel... the Banks are the Israeli Lobby and they tell our Politicians what to do and they tell out news media what to report.... it's all about brainwashing and distracting you from the truth
@ misstorys the story of Silverstein eating at the restaurant everyday is an exaggeration and was already debunked. He said he ate at the restaurant with frequency, that doesn't mean everyday.
@jdale1 well everyday ...yes. but almost every fucking day is pretty close. And his wife told him to go to the doctor? you buy this guys crap...he is a lying thieving asshole.
It would be a lot more accurate or at least acceptable for these conspiracy theories if they would stop presenting the "what if" angle. You can say "inside job" all day long but that doesn't make it so. I'm all for investigating a possible and or different side of the official version, but videos and theories like these fall way short. The "what if" is over played by theorists when they should be concentrating on the "how". So far, I have yet to see any evidence that points to possible conspira
@jdale1 "see any evidence that points to possible conspiracy"...hmmm the official report is a conspiracy theory. 19 hijackers conspired to do this attack. conspiracy' s definition eludes you. And the word theory has multiple meanings; philosophically it is "an idea", but scientifically it is a proven, repeatable premise. We are talking about science here. All urban buildings come with a "de-construction" plan..look up the peaceful uses of nukes.
I like how her video feed first pixelates or whatever you call it, then it pulls off to the side like it's an old reel film that is off-center (anyone remember the old film projectors? hahahaha) How can a digital feed pull off to the side? That's a cue to the anchor to resume control of the BS delivery. Just look at his expression after they lose the feed.
Time zone error = fake "news".
9/11 pre-scripted = controlled.
snakeskin2u2 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There was no "incorrect" or "bad information". The Rothschilds script was identical to all media stations, except in this case one hour too soon.
To broadcast the full "official" reasons for a physically impossible "unexpected event" before it has even happened for the first time in the history of the planet is just a tad more than a "mistake".
That the same script was penned prior to / ignorant of / BST - earlier than March 200 1- , with the full reasons for all "collapses" on 9/11 is clear.
snakeskin2u2 2 days ago
Comment removed
snakeskin2u2 2 days ago
Maybe they just got some bad information that WTC7 collapsed? They could have got the towers mixed up I suppose.
Naterbaterz 3 days ago
@Naterbaterz
That sounds an awful lot like wishful thinking. "Maybe my best friend goes to my house while I'm at work to help my wife with the chores, maybe my pillow smells like his cologne because he took a nap after helping clean the gutters, maybe that condom in the trash was from me and I don't remember putting it there?
EndTheFed59 3 days ago
Drip-feeding fake "news" stories will always lead to mistakes when differing time zones are also affected by daylight savings times.
Reuters press released this story - with all media stations - except in this case one hour too soon, indicating the story was pre-scripted prior to BST = before March 2001.
snakeskin2u2 1 week ago
and we are the nut-jobs. Riiiiggghhhhhhttt
poshuajerkins 2 weeks ago
Wow!
KA5H777 2 weeks ago 2
Rothschilds released the story by drip-feed with blanket coverage on al mediia stations.
This is confirmed in an official statement by the BBC.
Rothschilds' Reuters agency tiumed the release without considering BST - British Summertime.
The script was therefore timed prior to BST ( March 2001 at latest).
snakeskin2u2 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fake news stories carried by media will always lead to mistakes - particularly where time zone differences are subjected to - and affected by - local daylight savings changes.
That the BBC press released this story coming by drip-feed from Rothschilds "Reuters" agency, has already been admitted by the BBC.
It was not a "mistake". It was the intended press release given by Reuters to all media stations. However, they forgot to check the London studio time zone difference due to BST.
snakeskin2u2 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fake news stories by mass media will always lead to mistakes - particularly where time zone differences are subjected to - and affected by - local daylight savings changes.
That the BBC press released this story coming by drip-feed from Rothschilds "Reuters" agency, has already been admitted by the BBC.
It was not a "mistake". It was the intended press release given by Reuters to all media stations. However, they forgot to check the London studio time zone difference due to BST.
snakeskin2u2 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Drip-feeding fake news stories by mass media will always lead to mistakes - particularly where time zone differences are subjected to - and affected by - local daylight savings changes.
That the BBC press released this story coming by drip-feed from Rothschilds "Reuters" agency, has already been admitted by the BBC.
It was not a "mistake". It was the intended press release given by Reuters to all media stations. However, they forgot to check the London studio time zone difference due to BST.
snakeskin2u2 1 month ago
I'm pretty sure that the green screen they're using behind the reporter was not live, most definitely pre-recorded.
SubjectRuled 1 month ago
@SubjectRuled
it's live from Manhattan, brainbox.
snakeskin2u2 1 month ago
@SubjectRuled BBC says no green screen. Plus you can always tell if it is a green screen. And why would the sun be casting light on her face in the same direction as on the buildings if it were a green screen??
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 month ago
Rothschilds' "Reuters" press-released to the BBC one hour too soon.
snakeskin2u2 1 month ago
They forgot daylight savings time - British SummerTime.
London was 6 hours ahead of Manhattan that day, not 5.
Script was written prior to BST - prior to March 2001 (at the latest).
snakeskin2u2 1 month ago
All you need to do to check if this is real or fake is go on the bbc website and see their shitty response/reason for the apparant cock up. they dont have a good explanation
WhiteLight2590 1 month ago
The BBC was so humiliated after this report and they way they reported Dr David Kelley's murder, then went into full propaganda mode. Now they are unrecognizable from CNN. A great many of true journalists were fired the day this story was made public.
WellIAMScottish 1 month ago
sky a lie, bbc, see, what others dont
Str8Against1njustice 1 month ago
The script was timed without allowing for British Summertime +1 hour = prior to March 2001
snakeskin2u2 1 month ago
So the BBC can show live footage from places like Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq where there is poor signal connection, yet in America where BBC has headquarters, the connection gets "lost".
Hmmmmmmmmmm......
PartulaRevenge 2 months ago
The BBC press-released 1 hour too soon at London time = Manhattan +5hours, when it should have been +5 +1 (daylight savings time - BST) 20 minutes or so before the "collapse" which they stated had happened "some short time ago".
For such an error to occur, the following deductions may be made:
1) The press release was being drip-fed to all media outlets from a third party.
(It was the only wrong timing for BBC that day.)
2) The press release was pre-scripted prior to the day.
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
The live camera cannot be contested - ir clearly shows 9/11 was a scam.
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
I can't be bothered to research the claim that this was reported before it happened. The fact that building 7 is still standing is because the background is a fake background which BBC reporters use all of the time when they want to look like they are on the front lines.
toolworks 2 months ago
BBC lies.... no surprise!
OPEN YOUR EYES!
Shanga68 2 months ago in playlist More videos from suntereo
Comment removed
MrDontuo 2 months ago
its al part of illuminati
Onbekendbekende 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
10 YEARS ON, and I am still meeting "Intelligent" Individuals from many Countries and backgrounds, and They Haven't got a "CLUE" about "Building 7!" This IS The overwhelming POWER the Jewish OWNED/CONTROLLED "WORLD" Media has over The MASSES!! IT'S "TIME WORLD!" To STOP LISTENING TO THE ZIONIST/JEWISH Propaganda TOOL and NO LONGER ACCEPT "THEIR" Intimidating use of Blackmail that ANYONE WHO QUESTIONS "THEM!" IMMEDIATELY Becomes an "ANTI-SEMITIC!" This IS HOW THEY HAVE "SILENCED THE TRUTH/FACTS
einrib4truth 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I offer two links where it is not accepted the myth of the conspiracy. 100% of the engineering schools reject the myth of the 9 / 11. I have many beyond those below. In the U.S., Canada, Australia, Europe, Brazil and even in communist China. The only benefit in Cuba, Venezuela, Pakistan, Iran and North Korea.
aczjbr 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why the World Trade Center Buildings Collapsed - A Fire Chief 's Assessment - Deputy Chief Vincent F.D.N.Y. (ret.)
vincentdunn . com
aczjbr 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
World Trade Center 7 Report Puts 9/11 Conspiracy Theory to Rest
Read more: World Trade Center 7 Report Puts 9/11 Conspiracy Theory to Rest - Popular Mechanics
w w w . popularmechanics . com/technology/engineering/architecture/427887
aczjbr 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Structure Magazine - A Join Publication of NCSEA / CASE / SEI
How the Loss of One Column May Have Led to the Collapse of WTC 7 - Ramon Gilsanz, PE, SE, Willa Ng
w w w . structuremag . org / article . aspx?articleID = 284
aczjbr 2 months ago
Wouldn't it have been awesome if she stayed on the line long enough and wtc7 collapsed while she was giving the report...
arielhematsiraky 2 months ago
@arielhematsiraky
Not necessary - the transmission already proves 9/11 was a scam.
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
The live transmission clearly shows
1) that WTC7 (and the twin towers) was demolished to a timed schedule.
2) that the reasons to be given for the "collapse" of WTC7 (and the twin towers) were drawn up before the day.
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
The time span is of relatively little importance as it does not alter the fact that the transmission with live camera shows that the "surprise collapse" of WTC7 was in fact a timed demolition.
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
The transmission is proof that the whole of 9/11 was composed of pre-scripted controlled demolitions.
That cannot be denied.
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
All media stations carried the similar-worded report, although nearly all others were correctly timed. - They were therefore being drip-fed reports/ press releases.
For an error to occur in relation to present times (on the day) there had been no connections of the press release to the day in question -
- It had been pre-scripted prior to the day
For such a script to carry fine details/times of the twin towers "collapses" also, then the whole of 9/11 was pre-scripted = CONTROLLED.
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
They press-released 1 hour too soon at London time = Manhattan +5hours, when it should have been +5 +1 (daylight savings time - BST) 20 minutes or so before the "collapse" which they stated had happened "some short time ago".
For such an error to occur, the following deductions may be made:
1) The press release was being drip-fed to all media outlets from a third party.
(It was the only wrong timing for BBC that day.)
2) The press release was pre-scripted prior to the day.
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
The live transmission clearly shows that 9/11 "surprise disaster" was merely pre-scripted timed controlled demolition.
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. EPHESIANS 6:12
TheBaltimoreKnight 2 months ago
where is the time guys ??? where does it say 5.20pm
mattfm101 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mattfm101 At the end of the movie.
timoswanson 2 months ago
@mattfm101
Letters on the bottom of the screen state that the 47 floor tower had collapsed when it was standing in the background. The clip clearly states the tower had collapsed when it was standing in the background. Jane Standley and the film crews clearly ddi not know where Tower 7 was.
NearAbbeyRoad 2 months ago
Absolutely ridiculous, how does this video not have more views?
stirthepotplease 3 months ago
Comedy really is a question of timing, in this video the BBC are unequaled....
DEZZIELIGHTBULB007 3 months ago
The BBC comedy departement really does know how to give us a good laugh... John Cleese would be jealous of this little gem...
DEZZIELIGHTBULB007 3 months ago
im not a hater i just wanna know what is every ones opinion on this like why did the government do this?
biAnarchy13 3 months ago
@kentie. Jane standley said it was an 'honest mistake.' Honest fucking mistake, reporting a building collapse before it does?
Someone sent the script half an hour too early!
MrDerekMullings 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ecologicalguy I see that you've offered and opinion concerning Building 7, so I've got a very specific question for you regarding same. I think it is an important question as the answer has rather significant ramifications. Here it is. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.) Thank you.
azul8811 3 months ago
The truth is here.
rkymtntruther 3 months ago
If this really is the truth, then we the people have to take respondsibility for our actions of putting those politicians in office whome many are quick to condemn. No one person is going to come out of the sky and save us, we must save ourselves. And the first step it appears is to be honest with ourselves and aknowledge our rolls in our own fate as a people.
RejuveNationLifeSpa 4 months ago 2
Look into Barry Jennings...
MrBucellato 4 months ago
Has Jane Standley been questioned? Who is she and where is she?
kentie1964 4 months ago
the more free your mind is the easier it is to see the obvious
denka2000 4 months ago 29
@superrevivalcom LMFAO
chakazulu87 4 months ago
This is the most damning evidence that this was a planned event. Nevertheless,the JIDF will rush in to try to make this indisputable truth seem like fiction.
donsaiditwoud 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@donsaiditwoud I see that you've offered and opinion concerning Building 7, so I've got a very specific question for you regarding same. I think it is an important question as the answer has rather significant ramifications. Here it is. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.) Thank you.
azul8811 3 months ago
video of explosions liveleak.com/view?i=e46_1316112224
jomdeluise 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The inconvenient fact for conspiracy believers is that the firefighters said WTC 7 was unstable and likely to collapse. They even formed a collapse zone around it. It was widely expected to collapse. The BBC reporter evidently got her signals crossed and thought it had already collapsed. Big deal.
What's the alternative - that the BBC was part of the plot? Sure, that just makes a lot of sense. "Hey BBC, we're blowing up WTC 7 so make sure to tell everyone." LOL!
PoetryHound 4 months ago
Comment removed
Born2Flesh 4 months ago
@Born2Flesh - that alleged new video is doctored the perpeTRAITOR needs to be imprisoned - THIS IS THE PROOF OF THE THE MEDIA BS AND DEMOLITION - 9 11 FALSE FLAG ATTACK. JUSTICE IS REQUIRED
PHONEYPOLITICS 4 months ago
9 -11 = inside job
shame on the faggot politicians who know the truth
dubmatic808 4 months ago 43
she actually approve what she did, so nothing is fake, and no green screen behind her for dummies who beleive that
danielnault333 4 months ago
+ you can see in the documentary; 102 min that changed america, what there a secret service agent being film in tower 7, and that guy rush the cameraman to get out of the tower, cause they blow the building later on. and that guy from secret service was wearing some funny jews special secret service uniform, and that guy was really suspicious in my opinion. so i guess the secret service & CIA are responsable for 9/11 which could explane why they start are war for oil.
danielnault333 4 months ago
im not being funny,
its very obvious it'd fall,
god bless everyone who died on that day,
talkintothewall 4 months ago
Oh, they lost the line with Jane. How unfortunate...and coincidental.
Stepper11 4 months ago
Screen behind her or not, they reported this 20 minutes BEFORE WTC7 collapsed. There is documentation all over the Internet that clearly lists the times of collapse for each building. This report happened at 21:54 GMT, which is 16:54 EST (London is 5 hours ahead). Google the world clock. That means it was 4:54PM in New York. It doesn't matter if they were using some video of an earlier time or not because of that fact. Debunk debunked! Critical thinking really does help.
PrincessRikka 4 months ago
@PrincessRikka
I agree with your main point about the time.
With reference to a possible green screen or not. She was deffinately standing in front of a real window. Look closely and you'll see the brown frame. She even casts a show onto it, thus disproving the laughable 'debunkers' (yet again) who prettend that it's a green screen.
ShillBasher 4 months ago
These conspiracy theories are just pure bullshit.
Lasergridable 4 months ago
@Lasergridable lol, how stupid, do you have to be. YOU CAN SEE THE FUCKING BUILDING!!!!!
BDFPA 4 months ago
I am all for it being an inside job, but are you people nuts? She is standing in front of a SCREEN where they add the video in. She is not even in New York. They do this all the time. Reporters stand in front of basically what is a movie, or an older broadcast and pretend she is on the actual scene. Look real close. You can tell it is a screen. Geez. This is why no one listens. These half cocked people do not research it. DEBUNKED.
pootskins 4 months ago
@pootskins, 2:50 "I think we've lost the line with Jane Standley, IN MANHATTAN" DOH!! Talk about not doing your research you fucking moron.
kingcrumpet 4 months ago
@pootskins research it mate its all on google and you tube - its very real time to wake up - I saw this a few years back and went through the stages of green screen time lapse etc etc etc etc - it was reprted collapsed on all the channels early its not a blue screen the presenter admits it in a you tube telephone interview. watch it again its a live shot even if it was blue screen which it is not its a live shot - I hope you apologise to all the 'nutters' - oh btw -welcome to the real world.
PHONEYPOLITICS 4 months ago
That's so f*cking weird how only wtc's collapsed.
x0ticShwty 4 months ago
@kyrieeleison1973 Either way, one of us is gonna look mighty foolish eventually.
poddington86 4 months ago
@kyrieeleison1973 Well maybe one day in the next 30-40 years we'll have access to files which are currently confidential. 9/11 separates itself from the scandals you have mentioned by the sheer scale of it and the numbers needed to carry it out in secret. I don't disagree that there are many psycho's out there ( I have my moments), however I'd like to think that somewhere along the chain of command somebody would have said "hang on guys, this doesn't seem right". Maybe I'm being naive.
poddington86 4 months ago
@poddington86
I have no idea why they would want to keep anything confidential. If it's the truth, then so what? If it's all a big lie... hmm. Nobody will care in 30-40 years. Those responsible will be long forgotten by then. That's ok, though, keep making excuses for these people. They are laughing all the way to the bank.
kyrieeleison1973 4 months ago
Comment removed
poddington86 4 months ago
it didnt collapse completely until 5:20. part of it did collapse but only some of it. they didnt know it would completely collapse into itself. thats the most they expected it to fall, so they said collapsed. as for the missing footage, do you know how many stations were there reporting? even after that, when they showed him in the studio looking at the screen, it was really glitchy. the missing footage was probably them losing the signal. like how some people couldnt call with their phones.
MajicLaMa 4 months ago
9/11 was by the USA by the presadent and vice presedent and CIA not the muzzlims thats why they arent saying i did it.
davinfreeman1 4 months ago
Lol a screen? Even though it shows the smoke billowing and everything..haha u guys are ignorant as fuck. Play your fucking videogames and watch TV. When this 'New World Order' happens don't say people didn't warn you.
EnglishMicRipper 4 months ago
@DidYouJustMakeThatUp Yeah, it's a screen... Because you can clearly see the SUNLIGHT on the left side of her face, left shoulder, and hair... yeah, TV studios love to open their walls to let sunlight inside! Not to mention the sunlight on the buildings in the background. It's a screen alright... It's a screen.
PeoplesGeneral 4 months ago
@PimpOfPixels The WMD issue wasn't a lie, it was just a huge mistake. This has since been admitted (begrudgingly). As for a few hundred people remaining silent, this is where we differ. I do not believe for a single second that a few hundred skilled/intelligent Americans would be prepared to commit mass murder against their own people. You must have a remarkably low opinion of humanity and find it impossible to trust anyone other than your immediate family, or perhaps they're in on it too?
poddington86 4 months ago
@poddington86
Operation Northwoods. How prepared is that?
kyrieeleison1973 4 months ago
@kyrieeleison1973 Whereas I'd refer to Operation Northwoods as an embarrassing hair-brained idea that was never officially authorised, you would probably present it has concrete evidence that the U.S is prepared to murder its own people for the greater good (whatever that is). Seems a bit strange of the military to release these documents only months before going through with a similar plan. Then again if you think they are psychotic enough to blow up the WTC then anything is possible.
poddington86 4 months ago
@poddington86
What about the Gulf of Tonkin incident, then? Or the Iran-Contra scandal? I'm asking for a little critical thinking here and a little extrapolation. I'm not saying the whole of the U.S. Government was "in" on the plan. However, there is no getting around the fact that there are people out there who may be U.S. citizens but do not care at all about this country, rather they have their own agenda. Actions speak louder than words. Who benefits? Are we all safer now, 10 years later?
kyrieeleison1973 4 months ago
@poddington86
I'd also like to ask: Do you think psychopathic personalities do not exist, or that they are only the stuff of sensationalized serial killers splashed all over the evening news? John Wayne Gacy was considered a respectable person and a pillar of the community. That is, until they found all those shallow graves in the crawl space. It is probably a lot more common than we feel comfortable with.
kyrieeleison1973 4 months ago
@poddington86 they never realized it would be so bad, im not saying they did it but they knew it was coming and did nothing. for retaliation reasons.
BiGGraff100 4 months ago
@BiGGraff100 Sounds more plausible than some of the other theories but the first country they invaded was Afghanistan where heroin is the only thing of any value. Just doesn't make any sense in my opinion.
poddington86 4 months ago
@poddington86 and then they used 9/11 to scare everybody into invading Iraq...and lied to congress to get their war of oil
BiGGraff100 4 months ago
@BiGGraff100 sadly the trught i guess, what i shame, at least and not the only one who believe that theory
danielnault333 4 months ago
@poddington86 The WMDs were certainly a lie. To think otherwise would be naive beyond belief. Do some more research on that, and when you're gotten to the point where you realize the blatant truth of that situation, we can get back to discussing this situation.
PimpOfPixels 4 months ago
@DidYouJustMakeThatUp If you understand how cameras work, there is a depth of field range which will only keep certain things in focus at certain distances. ie you can focus a camera to only have things 10ft infront of it sharp while everything else will remain blurry. When the camera zooms in, it is using a digital zoom mechanism that enlarges the image. This won't change perspective. If the camera was physically moved 5 feet towards the window, then you would see a change in perspective.
stephenstudios 4 months ago
@DidYouJustMakeThatUp No, she's in NY standing in a building that had a view to the WTC site. That's a window not a video screen.
stephenstudios 4 months ago
retards. she started off the broadcast by saying reports are very very sketchy. they were told that building 7 was in danger of collapsing and mis interpreted that as the building had already fallen. there were alarms all day in anticipation of the building collapsing because it took massive damage when the twin towers collapsed. nobody on the scene that day was at all surprised that it collapsed. it is a weak piece of so called evidence by conspiracy theorists. smh.
15markeng 4 months ago
You know, when there actually is a genuine conspiracy theory one day, nobody will believe you nuts.
graemeh2009 4 months ago
@yuggoof Or is that just a conspiracy theory?
pookp1 4 months ago
@yuggoof The reporter believes the greenscreen is accurate or knows its obsolete. She can't see the image. Notice that she never turns around - don't curb that into "she's trying to ignore the building." How could you ignore the left side of the TV screen? The whole thing is only an ERROR that was not redacted, since it was likely AIRED ON TIME. ShitheadPlanet conveniently excludes a timestamp, which the entire argument is predicated on! "Before 5:20" is not a time. Only the shot is before 5:20.
pookp1 4 months ago
The fact that they lost the feed makes everything even more weird. Gives me goosebumps.
fabul0uz0 4 months ago
Hold the phone when does she directly reference the soloman bldg during the feed. because of of now this looks like an earlier broadcast that was messed with the ticker and the time stamp that is usually prominent on this news channels.
iconicEvasions 4 months ago
@pookp1 and with or without this video, its moot to more important questions. Don't immediately accept this as evidence, especially while it doesn't matter anyway.
pookp1 4 months ago
Couldn't that be a green screen behind her with an hours-older video playing? You guys point out Building 7, but miss the left side of the screen is different from the rest of the video. A green screen's role is to act as if its live coverage; they were looking for a useful area for the set piece. If not, the idea is that the CIA notified MI6 ahead of the demolition AND they ran the story too fast AND the reporters are foolish enough to not look behind them. Which is more absurd?
pookp1 4 months ago
@pookp1 ffs if it was a green screen why would the reporter use it to update and assess the damage as if it was recent and it take more than a few minutes to render green screen footage.
yuggoof 4 months ago
@pookp1
That is NOT a green screen behind her!, and I'll happily debate you over it until I make you look even more stupid than you already do.
ShillBasher 4 months ago
cause if the government DID pull off a conspiracy of this magnitude they'd tell BBC right? bahaha fucking conspiracy nuts...
ownageturtle 4 months ago
Greenscreen. They found a static stock image of the World Trade Center and rendered smoke on top. That's not exactly new technology. Very convenient to pull off. They masked it right on top of where the towers would be but forgot about WTC7.
XFi6 4 months ago
@XFi6 Even though they could just film out a window?
musiqman0709 4 months ago
this is absolute evidance that it was all an inside job.. you cant get any more conclusive proof than this.. this is the main focus ov what happened that terrouble day. to have prior knoledge of its calapse is solid evidance.. people need to wake up to this.. great upload, i give it the thumbs up.
djrobovw1 4 months ago
anyone see the 911 conspiracy onn bbc2 tonight? they forgot to mention their own part in it lol
SaintDonUK 5 months ago
So the BBC knew about the buildings destruction before it happened? How many people do you think are living with this secret? Do you honestly believe that they'll all go to their graves without telling anyone? This is beyond juvenile.
poddington86 5 months ago
@poddington86 I agree. There's way more problems with the conspiracy theory than there are with the official account. Not that the official account is perfect, but the people peddling this stuff are really not being critical with their own theory.
jessemaurais 5 months ago
@poddington86
Lots of people come forward, and you never believe them.
PimpOfPixels 4 months ago
@PimpOfPixels Who from within the BBC or US government has come forward and said that they were in on the conspiracy? Its never happened because the idea that thousands of people in the western media and US government conspired to murder 3000 innocent Americans is totally absurd.
poddington86 4 months ago
@poddington86 Typically, before you get confessions, you have to do an investigation. There never was one. WMDs were a huge lie that led to a million deaths and counting. What's so hard for you to believe that they could keep a few hundred people from turning themselves in for murder.
PimpOfPixels 4 months ago
@poddington86 Well for one thing, they weren't all Americans. About 500 were foreign. And they weren't trying to kill 3000 random civilians, but create a moment that would be etched in people's minds forever, so that they would appear to have a rational reason to enter the Middle East in a stupid and pointless war that has lost so many more lives than were ever lost in the WTC. They were looking for their 'Pearl Harbour moment'.
DeathByFeathers 4 months ago
@DeathByFeathers Ok so you've come up with a motive, now for the execution. Please explain what happened to the planes that went down that day and how no-one within the media, government, military or airplane industry has ever come out and said that "they were in on it". There are millions of scientists and structural engineers out there yet only a miniscule handful of nutty professors have come out and supported your theory. Wonder why that is?
poddington86 4 months ago
Somebody sent the script to the 'journalist' about half an hour too early! :-)
MrDerekMullings 5 months ago
Is it possible that BBC (reporting from across the Atlantic) could have simply named the wrong building. After all, all 7 buildings did collapse. This is hardly a "smoking gun".
pjkelly65fl 5 months ago
oh maaaan ...wtf ?!!!
hashwindia 5 months ago
This is the smoking gun...
TheJuggtron 5 months ago 21
standing her in front of the building to try and hide it
jacksaynor 5 months ago
Flight 93 was shot down over PA by Major Rick Gibney of the USAF 119th squadron. He received a medal for his heroism. When people found this out, it was explained that he got the medal for flying to Indiana and picking up a big wig and flying him back to DC. His F16 that day had only one seat, his.
Fl 93 was headed for NYC & the WTC 7, when it was shot down. The male anchor in this clip was asked about the on air mistake, said he couldn't remember whether he was on the job that day.
TheMiguelGrande 5 months ago
@TheMiguelGrande omg, you retard...it wasn't shot down, it was taken over by the brave men and women who were on the flight. Jesus Christ, ignorant fuck!
askererer 4 months ago
Seems to me that the police ought to bring that BBC crew in for questioning. Of all the buildings in the area they seemed to "accidentally" know which building was to collapse.
fuzzybollox 5 months ago
so none in the room she was in knew what the saloman bro building looked liie? youd think if woprd was received a building hadf collapsed, the media would determine what the building was, where and what it looked like
jalusbrian 5 months ago
I love the Narration & Arrows!!! Awesom Funniest Serious Video i've seen in awhile!
CammieSpectrum 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Silverstein said 'pull it'. Do you know how many weeks, or months it takes to prime a building for demolition? WTC7 came down on the same day. WAKE THE FUCK UP!!!
Do you know how much he made after insuring WTC7 against terrorist attack just a few weeks prior to the event?
MrDerekMullings 5 months ago
this is just insane ! i meen its standing up ! how much evedince is required to push an investigation forward , i know its 10 years late but justice must come through
QuiteNiceFilms 5 months ago
@QuiteNiceFilms it took years to find the sunken titanic... it's never too late.
ClubBangerTV 5 months ago
Time difference fools... It's not brain surgery guys.
fucttt09 5 months ago
@fucttt09 The building was still standing in the backround when she said it collapsed. Pay attention, its not brain surgery.
esc1127 5 months ago
LOL. If the BBC was in on a conspiracy, they did a very bad job. They made a mistake. That's all.
hcox 5 months ago
@hcox pretty big mistake
reaperjd 5 months ago
@reaperjd Not really. There was a lot of disinformation and false reports that day. It was chaotic. Don't you remember?
hcox 5 months ago
Thank you for posting this.. it is the smoking gun..
johndashmurphydotnet 5 months ago
If only the feed had lasted a few more minutes. Imagine their reaction has a building they say has collapsed then collapses on camera. LOL. That would have been precious.
thamnosma 5 months ago
Comment removed
RomanianBoyz 6 months ago
@aemp 2
That theory is even more ridiculous than a controlled demolition. I'd buy the controlled demo way before Dr. Wood's ideas upon which are baseless claims with little evidence to even consider. Many of truthers laugh at her investigation methods.
jdale1 6 months ago
Phil Haydon or whatever his name is, the guy in this clip told We Are Change UK that he was at the theater on 9/11 lol until they showed him this clip!
rubixlucifer 6 months ago
all Israel vs Norway info is now being censored
The unhappy Murdochs are starting to leak 7/7
ryanshaunkelly 6 months ago
yes I stopped listening to the main stream liars too, and joined the infowars team for truth too.... go alex jones and ron paul go
xtratabasco1 6 months ago
'None are so blind as those who will not see'.
Question: when will Americans see?
NamronSeven 6 months ago
I think it was clearly a black joke, designed to tell would be conspirator theorist that those who where really behind 911 can get away with anything they choose to get away with.
digitalgravy123 6 months ago
If you could be Iapetus the moon,the piercer,wouldn't you just have to do it?you know, just use gravity and the observer effects of the shapers to remove the veil on your dim.BS.Lets grab some test tubes and burn shit.Lets be careful,but lets never stop.Where the FFk are we?Whats this made of? Are you sure?What are we going to do about this?What can we do to win? What the F@ck does that mean.Who is in charge? Why have you never been asked these questions before?You cost more now.I'm just sayin.
THX1146 6 months ago
I'm so happy to know the War Criminal dick chenney is withering away with sickness.
sacopenapa 6 months ago
I know many if you do not believe the official story, which is fine I guess. It has been my experience with people I have spoken with that they have never read any of the official reports. They get most if not all if their information from either other conspiracy believers, videos and other things. This causes quite a bit of a problem when debating. Most people saw Loose Change and took it as the "gospel". I read the Warren Report first and other "official" documents before I could determine at
jdale1 6 months ago
This BBC bitch hiding the solomon brothers building behind her head and the BBC Pimp on the other side said it was collapsed. But when she moved her head the Solomon brothers building was exposed !! intact and standing!! She shouldn't have moved her head , that was the blunder!! Never move your head until you finish playing the shot!
partridgecaravan 6 months ago 2
The fact that the reporter said he heard earlier on the radio that some people find this to far fetched to believe it could happen while Jane is lost by the signal definitely seems weird. I mean he is looking at Jane and the building in question is behind her and yet he doesn't see it? I think she wasn't even in Manhattan but was in a studio with a green screen behind her to film this fictitious report to help add more conspiracy to the fire. I guess we may never know the truth...sad...
ed2see 6 months ago
"Where Did The Towers Go" by Dr. Judy Wood.
Direct Energy Weapons took down the WTC, no 2 ways about it.
aemp2 6 months ago
Comment removed
ed2see 6 months ago
I am starting to wonder if this was a disguised news story mistake to help add to the conspiracy about 9/11 being an inside story. I mean if the story was planned how could they allow this to happen unless it was on purpose. I mean this could be one of many set up stories to throw people off of finding the real truth behind what happened. I am not talking about the official narrative but a little country who has a large influence over American affairs needing to rope America into wars.
ed2see 6 months ago
@ TheyCallMeMrHappy so by your own admission you say that it's pretty close but not "everyday". Do I buy this guy's crap? You mean that his wife told him to go to the doctor and he wasn't at the restaurant that morning after you agreed that it wasn't everyday? You speak as if you know him personally. So he's an asshole based on these two instances and was involved? How do you come to this conclusion? Remember, the burden of proof is on the person (you) making the claim. I have seen no evidence
jdale1 6 months ago
I am bit of conspiracy theorist myself. The JFk assignation, NASA, and other headlines, including the most recent that we killed OBL. But I have yet to see much of anything in the way of 9/11 that points to an "inside job". I wanted too. All I have seen is a bunch of speculation, grainy closeups of videos and a lot of other garbage that only the gullible will swallow. No body seems to want to talk about or explain how such an operation was constructed. The next time you hear about a building in
jdale1 6 months ago
@ MrJkwilliamson the reason I don't give this video and others like it much credibility is because they take a lot out context or in the case of this one, take an obvious "flub" of words and run with it as "evidence" of a conspiracy or that it contains prior knowledge. No one seems to up in arms about the Peter Jennings broadcast in which he mentions collapse of buildings before the event. The video is just another example of hearing what you want to hear to support one's opinion.
jdale1 6 months ago
Remember IF YOU WANT TO MAKE A BUILDING DIE FAST MAKE IT FROM A POROUS MATERIAL AND STRENGTHEN IT WITH STEAL THAT IS WEAKENED BY WATER . THE RUST INSIDE WILL WEAKEN THE POROUS CONCRETE LIKE A CANCER. THESE BUILDING WERE BUILT TO COMEDOWN PERIOD...
EatTheRich2012 6 months ago
And NASA said WE NEED A SMALL NUKE WAR TO SLOW a MINI ICE AGE and like MAGIC Fukashima happened. It was MAGIC that superheated the clouds just before the quake right? Magic makes things happen here on DIRTBAG. It was MAGIC that paved mans quest to emulate the gods and CONTROL WEATHER. Magic happened on 911 too. Thats why these RUSTY buildings fell. In `91 I was apalled at the amount of rust on the top of the WORLD TRADE CENTER. I couldn`t wait to get down and told people then they were unsafe...
EatTheRich2012 6 months ago
I'm just asking mind you but how do we know that there wasn't some sort of mistake and that they might have been showing an earlier feed instead of a live one?
surfstev 6 months ago
@surfstev Looking at that video again, that has got to be the stupidest thing I ever said. My brain clearly wasn't working that day. The official story is a fairy tale and there is no reason anybody would have used an old feed claiming it was live. I guess my mind was thinking perhaps she may have been standing in front of a green screen and some idiot was playing an earlier recording in the background, but why would anyone do that and not come clean about it later? Too much devil's advocate!
surfstev 5 months ago
JUST ANOTHER FALSE FLAG LIKE WW1,WW2,911,OSLO NOW
GODDESSSful 6 months ago
"War and Peace"
[ Destruction~Property and Construction~Prosperity ]
Human INTEL~ligence: Encoded Information; i.e., The Sound, The Word, The Sound Bite, The Bit: Yes-No; 0-1.
Imagine: HOW-IN-FORM-ACTION affects the TIMELY ACTIVITIES of those who rely on a dualistic moment of "DISCRIMINATION and DISCRETION" involving SURVIVAL.
LIFE & DEATH: Events~Information, Geo ~ Logical ~ Human, encode Lingering Racial Memories. Disastrous Repetitions imply Extinction Level Events; i.e., FAIL [ ~SAFE ].
spiritech999 6 months ago
I don't think its fair that those of us who don't believe in the "official story" get such a cool nickname such as "Conspiracy Theorist" I think we should give the ones who do believe the "official story" a nickname. I have a couple in mind. Patridiots, Steve Wonderers (because they are blind to truth). Any other suggestions?
MrJkwilliamson 6 months ago
Lets see now, these people aired news that had not happened yet, they knew twenty minutes in advance, and yet still some people do not believe that there were people conspiring to create a disaster! who else would have given these idiots this story? maybe bin laden? mossad? al quada? i dont think the bbc is going to listen to them and go ahead with this story! it was someone who has great control over the media, that should shorten the list for the fools who still dont believe
QuackersJackers 6 months ago
I love how the ones who believe in the official story, call us that don't wacky, and "conspiracy theorist" but yet when a video comes out that supports our side, these people are the ones saying that our videos are fake, and try and find any little proof that we are wrong. Maybe if they did the same thing to the official story that they would see what we all see. That 911 was an inside job. We might not know exactly how , but we know that it wasn't what they said.
MrJkwilliamson 6 months ago
@MrJkwilliamson Israeli's pretending to be doing construction planted plastic explosives inside the buildings, burning jet fuel can't melt steel, the steel beams were also Cut.... they needed this to happen because they needed a reason to take over every Muslim Government for israel... the Banks are the Israeli Lobby and they tell our Politicians what to do and they tell out news media what to report.... it's all about brainwashing and distracting you from the truth
ToxicDreamer 5 months ago
@ misstorys the story of Silverstein eating at the restaurant everyday is an exaggeration and was already debunked. He said he ate at the restaurant with frequency, that doesn't mean everyday.
jdale1 6 months ago
@jdale1 well everyday ...yes. but almost every fucking day is pretty close. And his wife told him to go to the doctor? you buy this guys crap...he is a lying thieving asshole.
TheyCallMeMrHappy 6 months ago
It would be a lot more accurate or at least acceptable for these conspiracy theories if they would stop presenting the "what if" angle. You can say "inside job" all day long but that doesn't make it so. I'm all for investigating a possible and or different side of the official version, but videos and theories like these fall way short. The "what if" is over played by theorists when they should be concentrating on the "how". So far, I have yet to see any evidence that points to possible conspira
jdale1 6 months ago
@jdale1 "see any evidence that points to possible conspiracy"...hmmm the official report is a conspiracy theory. 19 hijackers conspired to do this attack. conspiracy' s definition eludes you. And the word theory has multiple meanings; philosophically it is "an idea", but scientifically it is a proven, repeatable premise. We are talking about science here. All urban buildings come with a "de-construction" plan..look up the peaceful uses of nukes.
watch?v=eAV_BUQoGBw
TheyCallMeMrHappy 6 months ago
I like how her video feed first pixelates or whatever you call it, then it pulls off to the side like it's an old reel film that is off-center (anyone remember the old film projectors? hahahaha) How can a digital feed pull off to the side? That's a cue to the anchor to resume control of the BS delivery. Just look at his expression after they lose the feed.
zimmernet527 6 months ago
Here's an agit for the non believer, yeah, yeah, yeah...
JOHNHBYK 6 months ago