Hello my friend.Calm dowm propaganga is shit.Are you the next guru.dont bring the holocaust in it was a means to power NOT CAPITALISM.fimd a scapegoat.
Socialismo é a redução da jornada de trabalho para acabar com o desemprego. Socialismo é a organização do povo trabalhador para produzir tudo o que for necessário para o país e além disso produzir excedentes para a troca solidária com pátrias irmãs. Organização popular em cada vila, em cada província, em cada distrito. Produção em alta de tecnologia acessível para o povo justamente porque a jornada de trabalho foi reduzida e existe mais tempo para o estudo e pesquisa.
Oh, I couldn't agree more. But in my view, Statist Communism = Statist Capitalism = National Corporatism.. Libertarian Communism is a solution, and reactionary Stalinism and Maoism is absolutely no solution.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I love it when the intellectual labels everything. Being a socialist and having worked for the "cause" of equality for many years,It still amazes me that you split hairs. Starlin was a dictator who held power by force just like Lenin and they both murdered millions to bring about utopia. Learn from the PAST-What are you going to do with the millions of people who disagree with your idea, send them for re-education. Practical socialism works , as it is being seen all over South America
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
We only have a monopoly because of the government intervention in the marketplace through the Fed....If too much government is causing all the monopolisitc problems (military-industrial complex etc.) then how can socialism ever work..Russia had 100% unemployment..everyone worked for the government and everyone was broke..We haven't followed the Constitution for at least a century..this is what happens..socialism doesn't happen overnight..it just appears overnight
Why should I care if most people will never reconsider Stalin? As long as people TODAY know the correct line when they see it, I have no problems with it.
I like what he had to say, although as a modern Trotskyist, I only wish the Stalinists would let the rivalry go because even in their view, Trotsky had to add something to the revolution. I just refuse to accept the propaganda of the Moscow Trials. I still give the Russian people credit for what Stalin took credit for, but ultimately Stalin didn't do much to actually help the revolution in the end.
Why are the Moscow Trials and the "old" Bolsheviks such a central theme in the Trotskyist narrative? What about the common people and economic achievements of the USSR? And how can you say Stalin didn't do much when maybe half the world during the Cold War was coming into the camp of socialism? (And no, the post-WW2 situation in East Europe was far more historically complicated than just "red imperialism".)
Because Stalin lied and exterminated all the true followers of Lenin. Trotsky would never have sent the USSR into a 1 man dictatorship, clogged by bureaucratic despotism. The positives from the Stalinist USSR are due to the People of Russia, not Stalin. If anything, his "assistance" to the communist international; is to make it almost impossible for socialists and communists everywhere. Stalinism weakened true Marxist theory. And don't get me started on his "socialism in one country" idea.
I guess Trots automatically identify "true followers" as anyone who came in after 1917 rather than from the beginning. (not that old equals good) Even you must realize Bukharin was the USSR'S Deng Xiaoping? As for the USSR's achievements, credit goes to the people AND the system in place. And what was that system? A "deformed worker's state"? Give me a break.
If derailing led to a super-power workers state with historically unequaled socialist reforms of free-education, 100% employment, free-healthcare, empowerment of women, and huge rises in life-expectancy - and then went on to spread revolution across half the globe - I would hate to imagine what this supposed 'original course' was.
Not true. However, I agree with you on Stalinism. He failed in the interests of civil liberties, which is imperative in true communism. Long live Marxism.
Yes I agree, he did fail civil liberties and may I add he also went contradictory to his own ideas in fact. Thats what Harpal does not mention or even the Trostkyist movement says. However, when people discuss Stalin I think it is one thing to talk about what happened during his rule and its another to look at the ideas he had.
Socialism in One Country means that socialism can be built in one country. It doesn't say anything about it staying there. In practice it does not contradict internationalism - it only asserts that an established socialist nation is a base for further revolution and it avoids the crackpot and idealist "permanent revolution", which believes that everyday, everywhere, at the same time is a good time for a revolution. Doesn't history prove things are much more complicated?
Context, Amsterdam78? It sounds like a reference to Trotsky's role in the Civil War. By the way, Lenin had a good deal of quotes full of the harshest, humiliating stabs on Trotsky too (I'll fetch them for you when I have more time), so it might as well not prove anything.
And like every any good Trot, I'm sure you'll smear the efforts of the USSR to assist revolutions and anti-fascist struggles in China and Spain, but I don't have time for this right now. Be back later.
@MarxBakuninMe erm... by successive revolutions in different existing national states, where particular material conditions prevail that lead to the possibility of emancipating workers of that state.
Hello my friend.Calm dowm propaganga is shit.Are you the next guru.dont bring the holocaust in it was a means to power NOT CAPITALISM.fimd a scapegoat.
mikesinghable 5 months ago
great joker that brar is!
yanovkaa 1 year ago
Stylish Nehru jacket he's wearing.
jumpnjza2 1 year ago 2
Socialismo é a redução da jornada de trabalho para acabar com o desemprego. Socialismo é a organização do povo trabalhador para produzir tudo o que for necessário para o país e além disso produzir excedentes para a troca solidária com pátrias irmãs. Organização popular em cada vila, em cada província, em cada distrito. Produção em alta de tecnologia acessível para o povo justamente porque a jornada de trabalho foi reduzida e existe mais tempo para o estudo e pesquisa.
babreumetal 2 years ago
Are some people in the audience allergic to him? are they being rude ? or are they really sick? IT is just that there are so many people coughing .
katalina125 2 years ago
mix of english winter and unhealthy students, with perhaps some rudeness thrown in! Oxford, afte
ProletarianCPGBML 2 years ago
People should read:
Stalin and the Struggle for Democracy
TheNomadicMonad 2 years ago
STATISM IS NOT A SOLUTION!
gallonsofmilk 2 years ago
But neither is capitalism a solution that provides
SkepticsRock 2 years ago 2
Oh, I couldn't agree more. But in my view, Statist Communism = Statist Capitalism = National Corporatism.. Libertarian Communism is a solution, and reactionary Stalinism and Maoism is absolutely no solution.
gallonsofmilk 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I love it when the intellectual labels everything. Being a socialist and having worked for the "cause" of equality for many years,It still amazes me that you split hairs. Starlin was a dictator who held power by force just like Lenin and they both murdered millions to bring about utopia. Learn from the PAST-What are you going to do with the millions of people who disagree with your idea, send them for re-education. Practical socialism works , as it is being seen all over South America
SkepticsRock 2 years ago
marx,lenin,mao
denizcabuldeniz 2 years ago
Capitalism and Socialism both cant work on their own.....there has to be a mix
veryvela 2 years ago
Uh no mr OBama voter
xEVILxEMOKID 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
We only have a monopoly because of the government intervention in the marketplace through the Fed....If too much government is causing all the monopolisitc problems (military-industrial complex etc.) then how can socialism ever work..Russia had 100% unemployment..everyone worked for the government and everyone was broke..We haven't followed the Constitution for at least a century..this is what happens..socialism doesn't happen overnight..it just appears overnight
gladiator1010 3 years ago
Why is old Harpo dressed as a vicar in this one?
simplex555 3 years ago
I think you'll find that this is indian national dress
ProletarianCPGBML 2 years ago 2
I enjoyed how people were consistently laughing out loud while he was trying to describe how wonderful Stalin was. Glad they're not buying it either.
crazylawstudent 3 years ago
Why should I care if most people will never reconsider Stalin? As long as people TODAY know the correct line when they see it, I have no problems with it.
Cosplay2003 3 years ago 4
excellent work!
melsvor 3 years ago 4
I like what he had to say, although as a modern Trotskyist, I only wish the Stalinists would let the rivalry go because even in their view, Trotsky had to add something to the revolution. I just refuse to accept the propaganda of the Moscow Trials. I still give the Russian people credit for what Stalin took credit for, but ultimately Stalin didn't do much to actually help the revolution in the end.
amsterdam78 3 years ago
Why are the Moscow Trials and the "old" Bolsheviks such a central theme in the Trotskyist narrative? What about the common people and economic achievements of the USSR? And how can you say Stalin didn't do much when maybe half the world during the Cold War was coming into the camp of socialism? (And no, the post-WW2 situation in East Europe was far more historically complicated than just "red imperialism".)
Cosplay2003 3 years ago 6
Because Stalin lied and exterminated all the true followers of Lenin. Trotsky would never have sent the USSR into a 1 man dictatorship, clogged by bureaucratic despotism. The positives from the Stalinist USSR are due to the People of Russia, not Stalin. If anything, his "assistance" to the communist international; is to make it almost impossible for socialists and communists everywhere. Stalinism weakened true Marxist theory. And don't get me started on his "socialism in one country" idea.
amsterdam78 3 years ago
*rolls eyes*
I guess Trots automatically identify "true followers" as anyone who came in after 1917 rather than from the beginning. (not that old equals good) Even you must realize Bukharin was the USSR'S Deng Xiaoping? As for the USSR's achievements, credit goes to the people AND the system in place. And what was that system? A "deformed worker's state"? Give me a break.
Cosplay2003 3 years ago 4
Funny how "Socialism in One Country" spreads faster than Trotskyism too, which might as well be Socialism in Zero Countries.
Cosplay2003 3 years ago 11
Stalinist scum. The only thing Stalin did was shoot all the true Leninists, and derail the revolution.
amsterdam78 3 years ago
If derailing led to a super-power workers state with historically unequaled socialist reforms of free-education, 100% employment, free-healthcare, empowerment of women, and huge rises in life-expectancy - and then went on to spread revolution across half the globe - I would hate to imagine what this supposed 'original course' was.
(Btw, Trotsky wasn't a Leninist.)
Rawkage86 3 years ago 3
"Btw, Trotsky wasn't a Leninist"
Now I know your talking out of your ass.
"The revolution without Trotsky is unthinkable." -Lenin
amsterdam78 3 years ago
Not true. However, I agree with you on Stalinism. He failed in the interests of civil liberties, which is imperative in true communism. Long live Marxism.
moronchicken 2 years ago 2
Yes I agree, he did fail civil liberties and may I add he also went contradictory to his own ideas in fact. Thats what Harpal does not mention or even the Trostkyist movement says. However, when people discuss Stalin I think it is one thing to talk about what happened during his rule and its another to look at the ideas he had.
danielshacalis 2 years ago
How exactly can "socialism in one country" spread?
MarxBakuninMe 3 years ago
Socialism in One Country means that socialism can be built in one country. It doesn't say anything about it staying there. In practice it does not contradict internationalism - it only asserts that an established socialist nation is a base for further revolution and it avoids the crackpot and idealist "permanent revolution", which believes that everyday, everywhere, at the same time is a good time for a revolution. Doesn't history prove things are much more complicated?
Cosplay2003 3 years ago 7
Context, Amsterdam78? It sounds like a reference to Trotsky's role in the Civil War. By the way, Lenin had a good deal of quotes full of the harshest, humiliating stabs on Trotsky too (I'll fetch them for you when I have more time), so it might as well not prove anything.
Cosplay2003 3 years ago 3
And like every any good Trot, I'm sure you'll smear the efforts of the USSR to assist revolutions and anti-fascist struggles in China and Spain, but I don't have time for this right now. Be back later.
Cosplay2003 3 years ago 4
@MarxBakuninMe erm... by successive revolutions in different existing national states, where particular material conditions prevail that lead to the possibility of emancipating workers of that state.
ProletarianCPGBML 4 months ago