Added: 2 years ago
From: smg944
Views: 8,092
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (53)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Damn fingers. It doesn't matter how many times it spins for displacement. It only matters how many cylinders there are to fire. Thus, 654cc x 3 per rotor x 2 rotors.

  • @Gin132456 it doesn't

  • @Gin132456 actually what I said makes perfect sense. There are 3 sides to a rotor. Each side is a combustion chamber, that's why there are apex seals at all 3 corners. Engine displacement doesn't care how fast the crank spins, and FYI, a piston engine has 1 combustion event every 2 revolutions in a 4 stroke cycle, which the rotary is. But it doesn't

  • wheres the subaru??camera car?? and wheres the 5.0?? all i see is a supra...

  • @smkcrkrks What Subaru? The Camera is in the 5.0.

  • This race is more like "BPU Supra vs. 1994/5 Cobra with some mods"

    There is no supercharger involved in this race, it would be obvious.

    Judging by the mustang's gauges, it has to be a 94+, and if the Supra is BPU (seems to have a couple), then a true 5.0 would have to have a few good bolt-ons and a good tune for this to be the good race it was.

  • they cant with me

  • @carlosvaldes2007 You're an ignorant bigot. Anyone can make ANY car fast. Let's see your 879whp mustang run down an 1100whp evo. Think you can keep up with john sheppards eagle talon? Ever run a 1000whp cavalier? what about a 700whp miata? 1400whp 1st gen rx7?

  • @auroradamien RX7 has a larger displacement engine because it is a rotary.. and i can make a 2000HP muscle car... but to he honest yes you are correct.. most cars can be fast.. a honda civic with a stock engine (not a b16 or sumthin) would be pushing it

  • @xmodrock not being a dick. but rx7's displacement arent what gives it potential. they virtually have slim to none as far as displacement goes. 1.3L. what makes the rotary such a good engine, is the vibrations are ALOT lower. and the direction, they move in one direction, compared to a piston engine going up and down, then converting that into a circular motion, (driveshaft). the rotary spins in a circular motion as does the drive shaft. thats where the upper hand is given and the rpms of course

  • @DUSTINxCLARK yea but the 4-rotors still have a pretty large displacement .. its not 1.3L.. its 1.3L * 4

  • @xmodrock Not exactly, if the 2 rotor is a 1.3, its not x4 its x2, and with the porting, and all added into a 4 rotor, the displacement is still a little over 3L. I mean don't get me wrong. 4 rotors are my all time FAVORITE motors, but displacement isn't what makes the hp, its the rpm's and the porting that create a majority of the power. As with any rotary.

  • @DUSTINxCLARK IDK man... but still.. its a larger displacement than people think.. its such a strange engine

  • @xmodrock Oh yeah no doubt, for en engine that can fit in a suit case, its incredible, it's a very under rated motor. It definitely hasn't been given credit or recognition where needed. Rotary for life.

  • @DUSTINxCLARK the 4-rotors are the best the two rotors are meh ok

  • @xmodrock 2rotors are not meh dude theyre amazing. tell me when you pull 350hp out of a 1330cc engine and ill give you a big cookie. 4rotors, that just like freaking satan went and bought himself a car. 1400hp for around 3000cc ftw

  • @Gin132456 i wouldn't buy a two rotor.. i would rather have the 4 rotor... more displacement :-p

  • @Gin132456 FYI, a 2 rotor is actually 3.9L, not 1.3. Suddenly 350hp and 12ft-lb torque don't sound as good anymore, does it?

  • @Milehighsnake98 no that doesnt even add up. 780-ish cc each chamber and 2 rotors would add to a little over 1300. why would you count one rotor revolution which would give you that when technically it spins the e-shaft 3 times, and a piston engine still only spins the crank once for ever up down. lol no.

  • @xmodrock 2 rotors are pushing the fastest 1/4 mile times compared to 4 rotor and 3 rotor...

  • @Tj1056 i wouldn't know.. i only play with piston engines

  • @xmodrock 2 rotor 6.5s @ 201mph 1/4 mile

  • @Tj1056 ummm that time is from PAC performance and last time I checked they were running a 3 rotor.

  • @Laser90dsm yea I watched wrong video fastest 13b is 6.8

  • 1 sec ago ford,chevy,dodge we will be continue owning the street for life brother,look my video on my chanel you see this yellow stang that my look simple ousite nothin much but hes pushing 879hp and 913tq and with a 347 dart block completely built,soo wassup bring your supra,i will teach you the meaning of power

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • a lot of guy with supras think o man shit i am gonna start smoking mustang ja ja ja soo funny right they are really wrong they got no idea who they playing with brother

  • youtube.com/watch?v=VNpODjlyUh­k  look this video

  • @Mr450 who told you that imports are fast they are a bunch of bull shit

  • A guy i know has a 600hp evo 8 and we raped the paint off a 5.0 in that little thing. Fun times

  • @Mr450 yes i hate imports they think they are the best

  • @Mr450 civics what im tires of smoking thos losers imports

  • @Mr450 what you mean

  • the supra was hanging with the ford

  • love mustang they best and the best on the earth supras suck and hondas suck too before toyota was thinking on make the first supra mustang was burning tires 50 years before sucka

  • @carlosvaldes2007 uhmm no, they're not. a bpu supra, usually meaning exhaust, intake, headers, etc. means stock twins and stock boost pressure. a blown 5.0 pushing 430 is going to make more power than a bpu+ supra. if it was apu than that mustang would be seeing tails. i bet the only supra's you beat are n/a mk3's. put up a video of you beating an apu mk4 and then i'll give ya respect buddy. til then, hush up, you don't know shit

  • @carlosvaldes2007 Uh, you do realise the first Supra was built in 1979 don't you? So its more lile 15 years, not 50.

  • jajajajajajaj supra suck and all of those supra on the street i smoke all of them with my 1991 5.0 hey think they buy those car to smoke mustangs jajajajaj sucka

  • BPU supra is usually round 400-460hp. but I don't think the tq. would be as close to the SC'ed mustang...could be wrong.

  • that mustang is quiet for being blown and a 5.0

  • can not see supra's ass :(

  • damn that supra hung on?? its bpu! it probably only made 350hp or 370hp at the most from what i no.

  • yeah i agree with that. I thought the mustang was going to take it like no problem.

  • wrong.. bpu can be as high as 500hp at the crank on a supra

  • i never said that they cant, i just guessed the hp of that supra, but thnx i didnt know they could actually get such high numbers.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more