This is ridiculously dangerous ... I personally have seen fire leap up the stream of lighter fluid and blow up the can in someone's hand. It is my opinion that this video should be taken down and replaced with one where you are not showing this extremely dangerous action. There are many safer ways to shoot fire ... and much more effectively, I might add. Good grief, man!
I would never dare to spray burning fluid directly into flames in that close situation. But hey, it seemed not to blow up in your face so it must've been safe, right?
@xintah it was lighter fluid which is flammable which means it just makes the flame spark up a bit and get bigger but you never want to do that with something combustible like say gasoline where it basically explodes with a huge flame
@raduandreyi that can work too. the bigger the fire the brighter the exposure. so you can decrease time as much as needed. I just stopped at the point where motion of fie can be frozen enough to get the look i liked
Thanks Robert for a great tutorial. I tried it and it worked a treat .once the fire brigade put out
the fire i was able to check my pictures and was realy pleased with the results. Hope i can rebuild the house before my wife comes back from holiday...... only fooling!
@picaticatara oh no I am not mad at all, I was just asking it it happened for real. And if you have a photo of it. The exposure will have to be a bit higher but same technique. bigger fire -> more light
it's the same thing... depending on camera model. P sets automatic exposure. Full automatic sets everything automatic (iso, pop up flash, exposure....)
nice, hey could i do something similar using a fujifim finepix s1900>? i havent got a dslr but a compact digital(fujifilm s1900), how do i take good pics of water droplets>?
@Ulsterman848 yes, because you will die doing that!
PuddelUndercover 13 hours ago
I shot one of my friends fire breathing and 1/1000-1/1250 is PERFECT for that kind of shot, day or night. It got that flowering effect quite well.
anikinippon 1 day ago
Does this guy have a death wish adding lighter fluid directly to a lit flame !!!
Ulsterman848 6 days ago
1:07 sublimal message!!!
radu270597 1 week ago
@radu270597 yeah it says "Unrendered" lol... worked it out first time
MisterSilkz 1 week ago
I THINK HE REVIEWED THE VIDEO AND THOUGHT, SHOOT THAT'S DANGEROUS, GOTTA WARN THE PEOPLE!!!!
Rocketceres 2 weeks ago
oh no, my expensive camera! where is the extingui... no no no no I mean almost 1000 + dollars. oh my lord!!
Rocketceres 2 weeks ago
this is so cool!
MagicWorld7 3 weeks ago
Why are you using f16 you don't need that much depth of field ?
furryfireman 1 month ago
What fuel did he use in the video? All the stuff I have found so far is way too runny and won't stay put like this stuff...
capnsilverleafPG 1 month ago
We were taught in the scouts never to pour flammable liquid onto fire or embers.
FIREHAWK1979 1 month ago
This is ridiculously dangerous ... I personally have seen fire leap up the stream of lighter fluid and blow up the can in someone's hand. It is my opinion that this video should be taken down and replaced with one where you are not showing this extremely dangerous action. There are many safer ways to shoot fire ... and much more effectively, I might add. Good grief, man!
myshilohranch 1 month ago
Did anyone else see the 1 frame of "unrendered" at 1:05 :D
Tman27261 1 month ago
@Tman27261 yes, I was trying to pause and read it to see if it was a subliminal message or something...:)
stellamaris347 1 month ago
Great video i will try this weekend.
Could you explain how to photograph smoke?
Thank You
ErwinListSanchez 2 months ago
I would never dare to spray burning fluid directly into flames in that close situation. But hey, it seemed not to blow up in your face so it must've been safe, right?
xintah 2 months ago 3
@xintah you are right it's not really safe. You should never squirt fuel on direct flame.
LearnMyShot 2 months ago 10
@LearnMyShot complete contradiction....
beathatdrum 1 month ago
@xintah it was lighter fluid which is flammable which means it just makes the flame spark up a bit and get bigger but you never want to do that with something combustible like say gasoline where it basically explodes with a huge flame
shittart583 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
tree thrown from 110 floor ? see my channel!
Firstbloodcod 2 months ago
5 person jelous !!
realmavi 2 months ago
OMG i going to do this, its awesome
putampoco 2 months ago 2
why not 1/1000 s?
raduandreyi 2 months ago
@raduandreyi that can work too. the bigger the fire the brighter the exposure. so you can decrease time as much as needed. I just stopped at the point where motion of fie can be frozen enough to get the look i liked
LearnMyShot 2 months ago
You're nice
M0rthyM0rdoR 2 months ago
3 dickles moron dont hv a dslr
vnk956 2 months ago
HAHAH Im looking at all these photography tips and I keep subscribing
candyqueenify 2 months ago
I like ur trial n error method of getting the settings right. I wish i had that much patience. LOL. Thanks for the great videos.
devilsonlychild 2 months ago
nice tutorial... it is nice to watch a host demonstrating with the video with practical sense... keep it up.
rajnaik72 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thanks Robert for a great tutorial. I tried it and it worked a treat .once the fire brigade put out
the fire i was able to check my pictures and was realy pleased with the results. Hope i can rebuild the house before my wife comes back from holiday...... only fooling!
MART2GAUNT 2 months ago
Unrendered video for the win.
Ruaille 3 months ago
Cool tutorial but I hate P-mode
applepiewithtoast 3 months ago
one person burnet their hous down
picaticatara 4 months ago 26
@picaticatara really?
LearnMyShot 4 months ago 13
@LearnMyShot dont be mad
picaticatara 4 months ago
@picaticatara oh no I am not mad at all, I was just asking it it happened for real. And if you have a photo of it. The exposure will have to be a bit higher but same technique. bigger fire -> more light
LearnMyShot 4 months ago 28
@picaticatara : YOU GOT FUCKING BURNED BY LEARNMYSHOT!!! >:D
Dennis060796 3 months ago
@Dennis060796 sic pun bro
CorpsicleBand 3 months ago
@CorpsicleBand : haha i hope that wasn't sarcasm xP
Dennis060796 3 months ago
Comment removed
scotman55 2 months ago
Thank you. I can now take the photos i need for my science project. But will it work with a canon powershot?
RoselieC 4 months ago
@RoselieC yes it will work no problem
LearnMyShot 4 months ago
Safetywise... not the best. Never add more fuel while the fire is still alive. That can go very wrong.
agpyo06 5 months ago 9
@agpyo06 agreed! be careful !
LearnMyShot 5 months ago
Un rendered.
bleiepro 5 months ago
awesome..!!!!
miyunami29 5 months ago
GREAT INSTRUCTOR!
jorgeamdv 6 months ago
Excellent
69tubeB 6 months ago
how did you ensure that the background was absolutely dark? Post processing?
shahofuea 6 months ago
Brilliantly explained - thanks.
DrBob1879 6 months ago
That's very clever. Looks good. Do you need to use heat resistant glass. Thanks.
christacrispin 7 months ago
@christacrispin you can use regular glass.
LearnMyShot 7 months ago
@christacrispin Thank you very much for getting back to me.
christacrispin 7 months ago
we only shoot raw, but can shoot jpeg if you like
LearnMyShot 8 months ago
Are these shots taken in RAW or no?
IvicaM90 8 months ago
@IvicaM90 it said RAW on the camera... taking dark shots like this would best taken in raw.
ikeywah 5 months ago
it's the same thing... depending on camera model. P sets automatic exposure. Full automatic sets everything automatic (iso, pop up flash, exposure....)
LearnMyShot 10 months ago
What is the difference between Program Mode and Automatic Mode?
meltdownman1 10 months ago
nice, hey could i do something similar using a fujifim finepix s1900>? i havent got a dslr but a compact digital(fujifilm s1900), how do i take good pics of water droplets>?
182popeye 11 months ago
@182popeye you need flash to take pics of water, two flashes works best from what I've learned
johnny48166 11 months ago