Added: 4 weeks ago
From: TheMadApe
Views: 4,170
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (95)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • It Kinda Reminds Me Of Halo Reach..

    

  • The conclusion to which we must come must be the one that assumes the fewest things. It is a huge assumption to say there may be another planet so near earth. It is a tiny assumption to say you don't know what the moon is, considering the general level of intelligence you display in most of your posts.

  • Im sorry thats the moon

  • Dude, don't listen to these fools that comment on here; they are either retarded, bored, uneducated, trolls, shills, pleasure seekers that don't care if they die or not, or just plain waste of space on this earth like this douche ex2cliff that had the audacity to say it's a lense reflection when you cannot see through it and it doesn't move, thus proving his or her 3 grade education; with all C's of course.

  • Looks like a glare -- if there were more pictures...

  • Where'd you take it at?

  • its either photoshop or a glare

  • its a shopped photo.

  • 2012 dec 21 end of the world planet x will colide with earth

  • @TheMadApe Sure Planet X has been found, however, it's quite a far distance away. No where near our solar system. So, for you to get a "picture" of it being that close, that's ridiculous to claim and sorry, but that's fake.

  • First if this was real, many people would have seem this, and the internet would be blowing up, second it looks like it is just a glare. Other wise, the photo looks amazing, and I have to say you must be a good photographer to get the glare like that.

  • That's a lens reflection... derp.

  • personally, I think it looks an awful lot like the moon

  • PHO-DOUGH-SHOPPED.

  • Could be a smudge in the lens.

  • I see the same thing when i get WATER DROPLETS ON MY GLASSES LENSE!!!! LOLOLOLOLOL

  • trololol did anybody else notice that the sun is abnormally large? >.<

  • @extremelewtniinja Not really, depending on where you live, and the time of the year, the sun can look larger.

  • It appears to be glare on the lens of your camera. Like Illusiveman said, it would have to be closer than mars if it were real.

  • canadian music what a load off tits. why is it with such a short exposure you didnt just see it with your own eyes it should have been the main topic with thousends of reports vids too. or maybe you have such a special SUPER cAMERA THAT WORKS OUTSIDE THIS REALM it even picks up elfs. nice lens glare, you get that when you point them at the SUN last post to retards i promise.

  • Einstein was still a human being anything is possible broaden your minds people embrace the truth

  • Its our bionary sun that orbits every 3600 years.

  • haha its a sun's reflection on the lens of the camera . If it was a planet it would be closer then mars judging by its size from the naked eye.... come on man , i believe in lots of things but this is just not relevant whatsoever..

  • lol that is obviously photoshopped

  • OK i have read a few pass comments, i think you should  take a few more photos for a few more days, and take a few witness with you , may be that will help to prove your case.

  • Did you remove my comment?

  • Planet X exists. Planet X exists. On this day he can not be near the city of the sun. . On 30 January sees him rise by 22 clock. April, May, he is in the vicinity of the sun.. On 30 January sees him rise by 22 clock. April May, he is in the vicinity of the Sun

  • Fake ! You will ask to me why did i say this ?

    I will ask to you , why only 1 picture ?

  • planets dont admit light thay refect light to see it like that it must be on the other side of sun and be hundreds of times biger than the sun.if planetx was between us n the sun it wud be a creasent like. or the earth wud have to be between planetx n sun. planetx n sun canot be side by side n have that image.the truth is out there!! the thinker dean

  • Now I believe.

  • How about night time? That close planet would be like second moon.

  • Neat picture

    

  • @Tappedline Thanks!

  • great music..... bad photo !!!

  • @KarlFrago Thanks. I wrote that tune. The photo is the real deal dude. Embrace your destiny.

  • @TheMadApe thats just a lens flare effect... god why you people are so stupid? and do you have proof that this is a planet?

  • @TheMadApe

    Half of your comments givers I already blocked, always on the search for these trolls

  • *sigh*

  • @Luckyrabbitsfoot1 I know. It's depressing knowing that Nibiru is here and the end is close at hand.

  • @TheMadApe - no... I don't get depressed about that. I keep finding things like this...might as well be DISINFORMATION... People who make fun of, or "think" they have the answer, just cause more harm than good. To me, this would indicate assisting the baddies... don't you think? Whose side are you on actually?

  • @TheMadApe - in addition...if you want to help, be truthful.

  • It's below the clouds. Must be a low-flying planet!

  • @byrdsmaniac it is peering through some hazy cloud, just like the sun was.

  • NOT NIBIRU! lens flare!

  • @MrMisimokus I know what lends flare is and this is not it.

  • Great shot!

  • @kandx420 Thanks. Just luck. I was in the right spot at the right time. A local radio station wants to interview me about this. Guess the word is spreading.

  • This is a joke -- right? It's an obvious lens flare! [facepalm]

    Had this been a real planet that close to us, no one would need this YouTube video to show them "proof" of Nibiru's existence. All anyone would need to do is go outside, look up and see this object. Hmmm... lets try that right now... looking left of the Sun I don't see any such object. Sorry, not a planet, not proof of Nibiru, not anything but a simple lens flare. People... use your brains and learn how to use your equipment.

  • @nutwithatheory I am glad that you think that this is funny. Learn to use my equipment huh? Yeah OK. If you only knew how ridiculous that statement is. This is not a lens flare. You are afraid to admit that this is really the beginning of the Mayan end time's prophecy's fulfillment.

  • @TheMadApe Are you seriously going to respond that this is a real planet? I recommend you visit your local astronomy club and chat with people who understand the sky. If you were really photographing a plant that large and that close it would be so incredibly obvious to EVERYONE that a YouTube video would not be required. Anyone could just go outside and look at it -- so where is it? Yes, this is an obvious lens flare and if you can't see that then you don't understand your equipment.

  • @TheMadApe

    The Nibiru Trolls will come out of the woodwork for this picture, great capture, you want to reassure yourself check out some of my latest pictures and don't let the trolls get you down!

  • @ozziestextures Oh well trolls to the left of me, trolls to the right. Here I am..stuck in the middle with you :)

    BTW you have some cool shots. Good on you!

  • @SpaceKills either get with the program or I will keep deleting. It is homophobic whether you think it is or not. No more discussion. Argue the video content and stop this nonsense.

  • @TheMadApe ok then, the video content is wrong, because that object appears only in one picture when nobody else sees it, how about that?

  • @SpaceKills If I had known that it was there, I would have taken more shots. The fact that the sun was in my eyes made it so I could not see it until later. Fer fucks sake take the damn photo, download it and analyze it. It is impossible to doctor a RAW image file without leaving a trace.

  • @TheMadApe there's a reason why i called you names... and you keep banging about this sun in the eyes thing, now read this carefully and get yout brain back to work : NOBODY IN THE ENTIRE WORLD HAS SEEN IT ; IT ONLY APPEARS IN THIS PICTURE - NO ONE SEES IT - NO REPORTS - NOTHING now repeat that 50 times

  • @SpaceKills I beg to differ. Look at all of the evidence that @ozziestextures has gathered. You choose to ignore the reality staring at you. We do not.

    I repeated that 50 times. Do I win a prize?

  • @TheMadApe HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA­HAHA ozzietextures!!! lol the dumbest retard on yourube after gilbable and briansyaweh! you serious dude? a fool who has believed in the black spot and mistakes lens flares for planets only gathers material for a psychiatric conference dude! ozzietextures...lol i don't believe there are even people mentioning that dull ass, is this your world? is this all your evidence? get some astronomy at least at basic levels not saying too much am i?...

  • @SpaceKills I deleted your comment because I will not tolerate homophobic slurs. You can tell me I am crazy, try to prove me wrong, but racism, sexism, hate, or gay bashing will be deleted.

    It was there. The photo proves it.

  • come on! why nobody else sees it? it appears only in this picture, what does that tell you?

  • @4MEGADON it tells me that people are in denial. Go out and look at the sun at 4PM and then get back to me.

  • @TheMadApe it tells me tat you see nibiru everywhere and that you know absolutely anything about how cosmos works and how impossible would be for anything to appear suddenly and so big without any gravitational effects at all, and how geometrically impossible is for an object appearing with the dark side toward the source of light

  • @4MEGADON Actually until I took that photo I thought the whole thing was bullshit. We have not even come close to understanding the cosmos yet. How do you know how gravity works? Until recently everyone though that Einstein's Theory of Relativity was correct and that nothing could travel faster that then speed of light. Now that has been proven wrong.

  • @TheMadApe this is a classic, calling up to einstein's theory of relativity to justify your delusion... that was never proven wrong, when einstein had that theory nobody knew about neutrinos and by the way the quantum world has completely different mechanics than classic or modern physics, they go through mass like mass doesn't exist, and this doesn't mean your picture shows a planet, it actually means if einstei could be considered fairly wrong imagne this one wthout any data

  • @4MEGADON talk about twisting words. Geesh!

  • @TheMadApe twisting words? what are you on about now? do you know anything about quantum mechanics at all? well get some, it's interesting and does not deny any einstein's work or theory.

  • @4MEGADON I know a lot about quantum mechanics. I know enough to know that physics has, in order to progress, must acknowledge that collective consciousness is the driving force in our molding our realities and our place in the multiverse.

  • @4MEGADON All that I was saying was that it was understood nothing could travel faster than light. That is now proven wrong. I also know that entanglement theory states that objects can interact instantaneously, regardless of distance which suggests that time, space, speed are nothing but illusions. We, in this galaxy, are probably traveling at greater than light speed now. It is all relative isn't it?

  • @TheMadApe there you go, nothing that denies einstein at all.

  • @TheMadApe "Go out and look at the sun at 4PM"

    Your statement shows you don't understand basic astronomy. As an amateur astronomer let me tell you that if there was a planet that close to us as to appear that large it would be visible 24/7/365. It would have been naked eye visible years ago as it approached by anyone who cared to look up. I recommend you gain a little practical understanding of astronomy so you better understand why this can't possibly be a planet.

  • @nutwithatheory You are assuming that the reality you have been taught to believe is true. I suppose that you still think that planets orbit the sun in a circular motion.

  • @TheMadApe The reality I've been taught? How about the reality I can observe with my own eyes and wits? For example, planets orbit the Sun on elliptical orbits which is observable by people like me, on the ground, from Earth.

    "The good thing about science is that it’s true whether or not you believe in it" ~ Neil deGrasse Tyson

  • can you please take a shot tomorrow same time and see if you can still get it

  • @ThePrasadvrk Of course. 

  • Well then congrats!, you might be the first to photograph the eluding one, in fact COR2 is showing an object near the Sun, may be this is the one

  • @ThePrasadvrk no objects near the sun mate, that was a lens flare too, if there were anything so big near the sun it would appear white solid not like it's illumined from the right side when the sun is on the left, it doesn't take much to understand it does it?

  • @ThePrasadvrk Thanks. I think I am first. Now I wait for people to analyze the photograph. The naysayers obviously have not because it takes time to do that. They are too busy standing in line to ridicule anything that they do not understand.

  • are you sure you got it for real

  • @ThePrasadvrk well I did not doctor the photo and it is not lens flare. Whatever 'it' is 'it' was there.

  • @TheMadApe the very fact you only saw it when looking at the pictures clearly means it wasn't there

  • @ColourfulWindowPane hey dumb dumb if you looked directly at the sun would you see that? Go try that about 40 minutes before sunset and see where that gets you. I can post a link to an eye doctor if you want. Moron.

  • @TheMadApe now listen to me ya dumbfuck retard, who else has seen this thing? how many? where are they? any space report? any people's report? any report at all? no! only you and this pictures which shows a refraction or lens flare and how dumb you are, but of course these are too many elements to take for a decerebrated twat so you go for the planet x thing i go for the kick your ass ya fool thing, and i won't be wrong

  • @ColourfulWindowPane while eloquent in your verbiage, someone had to be first and that someone is me. You are just jealous. Why not go out today and have a look.

  • @TheMadApe go tell nasa then...

  • @ColourfulWindowPane NASA is a NWO sock puppet. They suppress everything. There is ample evidence of that on this website. 

  • @TheMadApe they suppress everything? so why do they actually show it to you? you can access ALL info possible with nasa and study them like all thousands of independent observatories around the world. nasa shows things, you thnk they hide them, it's irrational.

  • @SpaceKills see @ColourfulWindowPane comment. I can take being called names as long as it passes my rules.

    No hate

    No racisim

    No sexism

    No gay basing nor homophobic statements

  • Comment removed

  • if such a massive planet was really there it wouldn't appear only in a picture would it? the entire world would stand in awe! not to mention it would have been visible for years through the thousands of telescopes on ground and space, seen it approaching our solar system and closing in and monitored like mad. there's no such thing. this is indeed lens flare. sorry to have shattered your dreams.

  • @SpaceKills My dreams are far from shattered. Lens flare? BUWHAHAHAHAHA. Angle from sun to camera makes that impossible, not to mention a dark object, the church, separating the sun, object, and camera. That object is behind the church and it was there at time of picture. You would have had to look directly at the sun to see it, thus temporarily blinding you, making it impossible to see with the naked eye.

  • @TheMadApe Sorry, but you don't completely understand the optics of your camera.

    "Angle from sun to camera makes that impossible"

    Actually no, the flare is exactly where it should be expected.

    "That object is behind the church [...] making it impossible to see with the naked eye"

    The object is left of the church many degrees and would be naked eye visible if real.

    "mention a dark object, the church"

    You're not in shadow, the church would not prevent a flare.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more