I'm sure it won't be long before some pretentious cock comes along and describes this as art and patton as a genius for expressing himself, when it is infact just him giving a handjob to a wooden box.
@jakethegimp2 That's just as silly, art is whatever the individual wants it to be. Unfortunately, that upsets a lot of people because a lot of people have their own clear definition of art that isn't necessarily shared by everybody else.
@jakethegimp2 Art is entirely subjective, the word only has no meaning if you don't appreciate anything as art. To view art objectively is to consider the opinions of huge groups of people who don't share your values completely redundant.
So how would you define art then, out of curiosity?
That depends, for an average point and shooter yes, For someone who understands lighting principles / how to control flash / exposure / setup multiple speedlights etc, no.
@jakethegimp2 This is presuming that the only talent you can have is technical ability, which simply isn't the case - art can be considered art for the message it communicates or the mood it purveys, or the connection it creates with the artist, etc etc. This is why art cannot possibly be objective, if we decided that only one kind of art mattered in the world we're essentially casting out entire artistic movements and differing opinions of billions of people completely redundant.
They gave a monkey a camera at a zoo recently, he took some pictures. Is the monkey an artist? Anyone with 0 musical background or talent in the world could walk into that room and create the same noise Patton is making, does that make everyone in the world an 'artist'? Art has to be a mix of both creativity and talent, not one or the other. If I give someone the finger on the street, I am communicating a message. Does that make it art?
@jakethegimp2 The answer to all those questions, depending on who you're asking, could actually be yes. It may not be your interpretation of art, but if somebody out there, regardless of how insignificant they are, considers any of your examples art, then it's art but only to that person (or whoever shares that perspective). Art is a wholly abstract idea specific to human interpretation, it is not a logical systemised concept. There is no way to clearly define it universally.
@jakethegimp2 That's one of the interesting things about art, it doesn't really have a meaning at all - and a lot of 20th century modernism and avant garde artistic movements were intentionally puzzling and challenged audiences to test those boundaries of what defines art. I do appreciate the things you're saying about Mark Patton and the intonarumori, but they're reasons why this isn't art to your perception. Perfectly valid viewpoint, but not the only viewpoint available :P
But if that is the case, then we need a word to differentiate between people who create 'art' via a real talent / skill, from someone carrying out any act without any kind of skill behind it and describing it as art. The works of Mozart and someone pumping a box shouldn't come under the same umbrella term.
@jakethegimp2 They don't technically come under the same umbrella. They're still both art insofar as they're both expressions of people's creativity (arguably), but specifically they're still completely different forms of art.
If a musician plays a scale precisely and 100% accurately, is that art? Nope, because there is no creativity to go with it. The other side of that coin is that creativity without ability/talent is equally lacking in artistic merit. I don't see any creativity in this video. In fact I bet if you got 100 people off the street to 'play' that box, you wouldn't be tell which was Patton playing it.
It just goes to show, experimenting with sound is a not a mature activity yet it still produces something most of us listen to daily regardless of how the music was composed and executed. All music at some point in it's development was experimental.
They are right, it's a very expressive instrument, so very natural. Just from the look on Pattons face you can see that he really feels emotion in the sound.
@Zegeebwah Just a thanks is good enough ;) As far as I know my kidneys are still good! lol..I have a Zoom H4n..I HIGHLY recommend it. But the microtrack is nice too.
@lecrapauddejerri9 They were a 'conceptual' instrument, created in the beginning of the XX century. Luigi Russolo, italian, tried to do music with noises, as the world was entering in the noisy modern era.
Crap I wish I could have seen the performance of that! I've always read about Russolo and the futurists but have only seen a hand full of YouTube videos. It's so great to hear a bunch of them!
How fucking amazing is that. He can make music out of anything. If there was blast beats and all he did was scream his ass off, well then that's music to my hears.
God, I love this sound! I'd sure enjoy to play it as loud and wild as possible. My favourite part: the sneeze. What fun they had! Laughing my head off.
@azzarogabbana I don't think you realize the history behind those machines and what the idea behind the futurist music movement is. I think you should read Luigi Russolo's Art of Noises letter. It might open up your mind a bit
Well, I am Patton's bitch as well. I love everything he's released and look for countless of interviews all the time. Just listening to someones fart just doesn't really get me off, you know?
he'll propably do a record using those noises and some toy piano and his voice and its gonna be once again something fucking amazing that im gonna be stuck listening to it for like 3 years.That guy is unbeliavable
im sorry but i love mike patton, mondo cane and especially FNM (and a little of fantomas and PT) but what is this? I hope this machine is for sound effects only because this sounds like a table saw...
@Lupus1993 Well, he's recording everything with a portable stereo digital recorder. I'm sure we'll hear these tones in some capacity in future Patton releases.
Daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamn right. Except for about 50% of Peeping Tom. I thought that record was going to kick ass but it only stubbed its toe on ass.
They're unique and reproducible sound effects. I can easily see why Mike Patton would be interested in something like this with the type of music he makes.
it's acoustic dubstep
SNB222 1 month ago
@SNB222 fuck that. It's acoustic Sunn 0)))
zeppelinman4232 1 month ago
@zeppelinman4232 lol Sunn 0))) unplugged
SNB222 1 week ago
@SNB222 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
zeppelinman4232 1 week ago
this intrument, i think its for the soundtrack of the movies or idk XD
franny96MJ 1 month ago
I'm sure it won't be long before some pretentious cock comes along and describes this as art and patton as a genius for expressing himself, when it is infact just him giving a handjob to a wooden box.
jakethegimp2 3 months ago
@jakethegimp2 Thank god you're here to lecture us about what art is.
JacobMorrisNinetyTwo 2 months ago
@JacobMorrisNinetyTwo
You have me mistaken, I'm here to lecture you about what art isn't.
jakethegimp2 2 months ago
@jakethegimp2 That's just as silly, art is whatever the individual wants it to be. Unfortunately, that upsets a lot of people because a lot of people have their own clear definition of art that isn't necessarily shared by everybody else.
JacobMorrisNinetyTwo 2 months ago
@JacobMorrisNinetyTwo
If art is whatever the individual wants it to be, then the word has no meaning whatsoever outside of a subjective viewpoint.
jakethegimp2 2 months ago
@jakethegimp2 Art is entirely subjective, the word only has no meaning if you don't appreciate anything as art. To view art objectively is to consider the opinions of huge groups of people who don't share your values completely redundant.
So how would you define art then, out of curiosity?
JacobMorrisNinetyTwo 2 months ago
@JacobMorrisNinetyTwo
I would define art as expression demonstrated by a skill or talent. There is no skill / talent involved here, just somebody pumping a wooden box.
jakethegimp2 2 months ago
@jakethegimp2 Would you define photography as just someone pointing and clicking a box?
Chinardo 2 months ago
@Chinardo
That depends, for an average point and shooter yes, For someone who understands lighting principles / how to control flash / exposure / setup multiple speedlights etc, no.
jakethegimp2 2 months ago
@jakethegimp2 This is presuming that the only talent you can have is technical ability, which simply isn't the case - art can be considered art for the message it communicates or the mood it purveys, or the connection it creates with the artist, etc etc. This is why art cannot possibly be objective, if we decided that only one kind of art mattered in the world we're essentially casting out entire artistic movements and differing opinions of billions of people completely redundant.
ImaginaryMinstrels 1 month ago
@ImaginaryMinstrels
They gave a monkey a camera at a zoo recently, he took some pictures. Is the monkey an artist? Anyone with 0 musical background or talent in the world could walk into that room and create the same noise Patton is making, does that make everyone in the world an 'artist'? Art has to be a mix of both creativity and talent, not one or the other. If I give someone the finger on the street, I am communicating a message. Does that make it art?
jakethegimp2 1 month ago
@jakethegimp2 The answer to all those questions, depending on who you're asking, could actually be yes. It may not be your interpretation of art, but if somebody out there, regardless of how insignificant they are, considers any of your examples art, then it's art but only to that person (or whoever shares that perspective). Art is a wholly abstract idea specific to human interpretation, it is not a logical systemised concept. There is no way to clearly define it universally.
JacobMorrisNinetyTwo 1 month ago
@JacobMorrisNinetyTwo
I do somewhat agree with you. But if that is that case then the word 'art' has absolutely no valid meaning whatsoever.
jakethegimp2 1 month ago
@jakethegimp2 That's one of the interesting things about art, it doesn't really have a meaning at all - and a lot of 20th century modernism and avant garde artistic movements were intentionally puzzling and challenged audiences to test those boundaries of what defines art. I do appreciate the things you're saying about Mark Patton and the intonarumori, but they're reasons why this isn't art to your perception. Perfectly valid viewpoint, but not the only viewpoint available :P
JacobMorrisNinetyTwo 1 month ago
@JacobMorrisNinetyTwo
But if that is the case, then we need a word to differentiate between people who create 'art' via a real talent / skill, from someone carrying out any act without any kind of skill behind it and describing it as art. The works of Mozart and someone pumping a box shouldn't come under the same umbrella term.
jakethegimp2 1 month ago
@jakethegimp2 They don't technically come under the same umbrella. They're still both art insofar as they're both expressions of people's creativity (arguably), but specifically they're still completely different forms of art.
JacobMorrisNinetyTwo 1 month ago
@JacobMorrisNinetyTwo Music is entirely conceptual, there are no boundaries beyond sound. The rest is perception, aural training and understanding.
MorkaGraven 1 month ago
@ImaginaryMinstrels
If a musician plays a scale precisely and 100% accurately, is that art? Nope, because there is no creativity to go with it. The other side of that coin is that creativity without ability/talent is equally lacking in artistic merit. I don't see any creativity in this video. In fact I bet if you got 100 people off the street to 'play' that box, you wouldn't be tell which was Patton playing it.
jakethegimp2 1 month ago
It just goes to show, experimenting with sound is a not a mature activity yet it still produces something most of us listen to daily regardless of how the music was composed and executed. All music at some point in it's development was experimental.
MorkaGraven 3 months ago
i think this was used for mondo cane
phreestylesk8r 3 months ago
0:52-0:56 lol
marc0d0n 3 months ago
Lol, you could use that to cover Meshuggah.
Tordah26 4 months ago
loše loše i opet loše sve će se svesti na njegov lijevi kroše
fuckoffplan 5 months ago
2:01 :D
borowczyk76 6 months ago
its stupid
dragontooth81 7 months ago
get me out of this air-conditioned nightmare!
apxeli 7 months ago
They are right, it's a very expressive instrument, so very natural. Just from the look on Pattons face you can see that he really feels emotion in the sound.
untuned92 9 months ago
hahahaha patton is horny hahahaha
asesino1401 11 months ago
Sounds like a dead badger carcass.
ArgHamster 11 months ago
@ArgHamster as opposed to a live badger carcass?
fuckamericanidiot 11 months ago 10
Is anyone able to make out what kind of recording device Mike is getting those sounds with? I would love to pick one up and record sounds of my own.
Zegeebwah 1 year ago
@Zegeebwah It's a Microtrack from M audio
ditroiamusic 11 months ago
@ditroiamusic
I owe you a kidney mate!
Zegeebwah 11 months ago
@Zegeebwah Just a thanks is good enough ;) As far as I know my kidneys are still good! lol..I have a Zoom H4n..I HIGHLY recommend it. But the microtrack is nice too.
ditroiamusic 11 months ago
I am a heterosexual male, but god DAMN he is sexy
hayter4god 1 year ago 5
Pretentious idiot
passiveMenis 1 year ago
you people are on drugs, it sounds fuckin' amazing.
milkboymedia 1 year ago
it's a shame it sounds like a dying camel with diarrhea
iggyds89 1 year ago 7
He's a pretentious bastard, but I love him XD
ska2808 1 year ago
At 0:35 he said "fuck" in italian (cazzo).
zappamania89 1 year ago 3
8O I love these noise makers!!
stanchinsky 1 year ago
Research Mickey Hart and The Grateful Dead...he's been making these sounds since 1980...NOTHING new my friends!...(refer to: DRUMS/SPACE)
AvirtualSwitzerland 1 year ago
@AvirtualSwitzerland
the futurists were around in the late 1700s
Catalyst2376 1 year ago
@Catalyst2376 .....Get your story straight, Chumly.....Luigi Russolo invented the device in 1913 (Around 200 years AFTER your alleged date)
AvirtualSwitzerland 1 year ago
@AvirtualSwitzerland
your right, typo, just as long as the Dead dont get credit for Futurists lol
Catalyst2376 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AvirtualSwitzerland
the futurists were around in the early 1900s
Catalyst2376 1 year ago
are these real instruments or just a one off thing?
lecrapauddejerri9 1 year ago
@lecrapauddejerri9 They were a 'conceptual' instrument, created in the beginning of the XX century. Luigi Russolo, italian, tried to do music with noises, as the world was entering in the noisy modern era.
Gabzau 1 year ago 2
I bet he would have fucking loved that.
seanileus 1 year ago
genius at work
DAVIDVINCENTDURING 1 year ago
Great stuff. Interesting to see these nosie machines in action.
CodyRicheson 1 year ago
Comment removed
guitdude09 1 year ago
Comment removed
guitdude09 1 year ago
Comment removed
guitdude09 1 year ago
this is hillarious:D
prodigy503 1 year ago
Mmmmm... that's powerful.
(HAHAHAHAHA!)
beauch 1 year ago
either the guy with the beard is 4'11" or mike is wearing heels!!
melvincrover 1 year ago
i want that little recorder he has dammit!
KrumpleStump 1 year ago
Crap I wish I could have seen the performance of that! I've always read about Russolo and the futurists but have only seen a hand full of YouTube videos. It's so great to hear a bunch of them!
medanzig 1 year ago
haha, if anyone could appreciate a noisemaker like that, it's Mike Patton.
SolarEXtract 1 year ago
omg i wish i was there D:
TheCatasstrophy 1 year ago
How fucking amazing is that. He can make music out of anything. If there was blast beats and all he did was scream his ass off, well then that's music to my hears.
Stampit88 1 year ago
Just noticed this video has transcribed closed captioning now (guessing translation) and watching this video with that. Try it.
AnangoMagic 1 year ago
What the HELL is in those boxes. This is so awesome.
hexachordal 1 year ago
This noise makes me sleepy
1Heretic 1 year ago
You can get the same sounds at a construction site.....
crazzzymike69 1 year ago
He's like a child with a new toy
danwillingham 1 year ago 16
that sounds like a whale.
bytheasea 1 year ago
His face at 2:04 is pretty funny. ^_^
ohboypokemon 1 year ago
next week, mike patton will play a woodchipper. see ya next time
PromisingAttempt 1 year ago
What sort of recorder is Patton holding? It seems to be a field recorder of some kind.
hazestudios 1 year ago
i just had a flash back, THANXALOT...
differentbeing 1 year ago
Masami Akita needs one. BAD. haha.
dirtyhandgesture 1 year ago
no no, he calls it art,
he's just realized that music is only a sound.
danzig5 1 year ago
I want 300! I could make this noise forever.
AngeloNoel 1 year ago
i want one
cholocharile 1 year ago
a sound only a select few can dig... not for me tho
GoGoNards 1 year ago
@GoGoNards I can dig. I think its awesome.
Fucking closed minded people thinking this is shit.
gali32731 1 year ago 2
God, I love this sound! I'd sure enjoy to play it as loud and wild as possible. My favourite part: the sneeze. What fun they had! Laughing my head off.
LsdLia 1 year ago
They were experimental sound machines from the turn of the century. They aren't meant to sound "good"
crazydharma 1 year ago
what a bunch of shitty sounds...give him a black & Decker and let him make music from it
azzarogabbana 2 years ago
@azzarogabbana You call it art, he calls it money. Do you like to lick money? Patton sure does. :D
ArgHamster 1 year ago
@azzarogabbana I don't think you realize the history behind those machines and what the idea behind the futurist music movement is. I think you should read Luigi Russolo's Art of Noises letter. It might open up your mind a bit
gtralisfr69 1 year ago
For all as I care, Patton could record jis farts and I'd still listen to it.
Infuzor 2 years ago 4
> Admitting you're a tool
TheWhiteShaded 2 years ago
LMFAO.
Deadbeans 1 year ago
Haha, best comment ever :)
milehily32 2 years ago
@Infuzor :
I agree. Same for me. I don't care as long as it sounds strange/weird.
LsdLia 1 year ago
Well, I am Patton's bitch as well. I love everything he's released and look for countless of interviews all the time. Just listening to someones fart just doesn't really get me off, you know?
TheWhiteShaded 1 year ago
Sure. But might be a nice sound collage if it was in tune with the rest of the song ... ;-)
LsdLia 1 year ago
at 2:52 you can hear Mike saying "Cazzo!"..that is like "Oh F@ck!" in italian.. :)
oidige1977 2 years ago 5
Love him.
NostalgicProcrast 2 years ago 2
Those sounds would certainly keep me awake and probably give me a migraine too. Mmm....
Deloqua 2 years ago
he'll propably do a record using those noises and some toy piano and his voice and its gonna be once again something fucking amazing that im gonna be stuck listening to it for like 3 years.That guy is unbeliavable
Thisismynameffs 2 years ago 54
@Thisismynameffs
He will even include the man sneezing in the chorus.
ShaneyG1993 1 year ago
@Thisismynameffs he already did haha it's called Pranzo Oritzo or something, but it wasnt that good :(
lecrapauddejerri9 1 year ago
the man is a genius
smokescreencooper 2 years ago 3
im sorry but i love mike patton, mondo cane and especially FNM (and a little of fantomas and PT) but what is this? I hope this machine is for sound effects only because this sounds like a table saw...
Lupus1993 2 years ago
@Lupus1993 Well, he's recording everything with a portable stereo digital recorder. I'm sure we'll hear these tones in some capacity in future Patton releases.
mikeroephonics 2 years ago
Let's start a pool on the chances that Mike makes an entire album with this thing.
Fetrey 2 years ago 2
I dont know what I like better the old creaky door sound at 2:04, or the combo of the next sound and the face he makes.
eoniabstract 2 years ago
Toen jij hier laatst avonds net weg was, kwam opeens Faith No More live op tv met Mikie
Harrootjo 2 years ago
Daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamn right. Except for about 50% of Peeping Tom. I thought that record was going to kick ass but it only stubbed its toe on ass.
PsionikMushroom 2 years ago
Very Cool. Kind of sounds like a big ol' bomber plane from a world war II movie!
badfender223 2 years ago
What the fuck is patton wearing?
PsionikMushroom 2 years ago
CLOTHES! oh god, people on youtube are getting dumber by the minute
ELkuken 2 years ago 16
Lol, no I'm talking about his little "device". Looks like a recorder but not one I've ever seen and the brand is a mystery to me aswell.
PsionikMushroom 2 years ago
oh, wearing as in he's wearing the headphones for it? i was a little confused there.
ELkuken 2 years ago
Yeah, that's what I was reffering to. No problem, I would've probably made the same mistake :p
PsionikMushroom 2 years ago
I've always had an interest in how these things sounded, hooray for futurism/dada
infamouskirch 2 years ago
what is it for record instruments in Patton hands? I am looking something like that - cheap marked stereo portable recorder
murmar 2 years ago
Zoom h2 i think
infamouskirch 2 years ago
Insanely fucking awesome. I WISH I could go to the final show.
Gezarie07 2 years ago
The Intonarumori is hilarious, but Patton. is Hot!
I am sure he will cook up something delicious. Who is hungry?
GB517 2 years ago
0:52
Best sneeze ever.
maynrdjkeenan 2 years ago 2
lol ,that's hilarious
TheAceRaven 2 years ago
Oh wow I want one for my 21st! LOL Pattons awesome :)
robbiereindeerlover 2 years ago
Wow...a big piece of wood that makes farting sounds....brilliant!
lyricfive 2 years ago
They're unique and reproducible sound effects. I can easily see why Mike Patton would be interested in something like this with the type of music he makes.
OrbitalBallroom 2 years ago 4
am i spotting some white hair on pattons head?
RedOnChrome 2 years ago
Its just the lighting dude, it all black........:)
Torchbearer666 2 years ago
nice flatulatron, i give it 2.5 bowl movments and 1 hairball up.
cellcycleTV 2 years ago 2
I like the sneeze better...
karlynfarris 2 years ago
Mike Patton really looks like a guido these days
jgarra 2 years ago
Well he does speak fluent italian
merrett 2 years ago
WTF
guillermodechile 2 years ago
Nice!
TazAcida 2 years ago
Guttural!
Syntaax 2 years ago
I bet that thing vibrates nicely
trinersify 2 years ago 3
must be a lot of rubber bands!!! Looks like a fun instrument.
trinersify 2 years ago
Mike Patton's a nice fellow.
fullinmusic 2 years ago 6
Rule 34 on wooden boxes and music.
Mike Patton is the best.
lmm85 2 years ago
-1 for newfg
damarei 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
+1 for self righteous douchebaggery.
lmm85 2 years ago
I'm not the one spouting memes.
"HEY EVERYONE LOOK AT ME I NEED TO BELONG SOMEWHERE"
damarei 2 years ago
Calling someone a newfag comes straight out of 4chan :p
We're on the same boat, pal.
lmm85 2 years ago
/b/rothers!!
PATEv4 2 years ago
I hate you, and you should feel bad about yourself
damarei 2 years ago
/b/rothers!!
PATEv4 2 years ago
rules one and two, Pate.
TyK9293 2 years ago
this is something that i've never seen before...
and I like it! yeaah !! ☺
enisse93 2 years ago 2
What a bizarre instrument. I can't wait to hear what Patton manages to cook up!
eyesocketlife 2 years ago
Sounds like a kind of big whale. A big, sick, whale. Of metal. A big, sick, and metallic whale.
ELOdry 2 years ago 6
oh yeah baby - i vant one of these things
russrussell666 2 years ago
Hmmm, rather odd, but cool
GrooveMetalDude 2 years ago
those things sounds incredible.... very nice, patton
itscurbe 2 years ago 2