Unreal Engine is the leading engine and will always be.. Unreal is more open with its stuff also. Unreal Developement Kit is given away for free.. Means more games and more fame for Unreal Engine 3.. Crytek will never reach Epic Games class.. Never ever!
Unreal engine wins it all the way. It does everything better except it's tools for creating vast landscapes(which it can do, just not as easily). Unreal is focused more on closed environments. A lot of people are saying it's better for futuristic games, this is total BS. Just because people use the unreal engine to make sci-fi games doesn't mean thats all it can do. There are many realistic games on the unreal engine, they just sucked, not because of the engine, but because of the developers.
@kennyb010 Cry Engine cause COD is based on modern days if u talking about a COD MW game so the graphics of cryengine would be realistic like almost in real life, unreal engine is for futuristic games.
how about the two companies creating a Cryreal engine, that way we can have realistic and futuristic games with the fps of the Unreal engine, not so heavy grapx as the cryengine 2!
@TR4Alwayz If you build it yourself it won't cost you $3,000 and won't lag either like Gears of War does. Don't get me wrong I love Gears. But Crysis looks better in my opinion.
cry engine 3 is more of a compatibility and efficiency upgrade, mainly so that it may run on consoles. although im sure it will have a graphic update as well, at least for the pc, it probably wont be much.
actually no. It is upgraded on the pc, it has a few new features like deferred lighting, incredible physics, facial animation, true building destructibility (the walls break this time, no primitively welded scraps of metal simply coming apart) and the like.
Sadly though, the console versions suck...so hard. It doesn't even have subsurface scattering, and now cryshit 2 doesn't even take place in the jungle cuz of this damn console compatibility shit.
why do i have a feeling that ppl have never heard about chrome engine 4 which call of juarez: bound in blood uses. Chrome engine 4 already looks better than unreal engine 4.
unreal engine 3 gives more eye candy then what cry engine 2 does thats what igot out of this video atleast... but i would like to see how cry engine 3 vs unreal engine 3 ... :)
Poor comparison. Video barely scratches the surface of crysis visuals and looks like low res and medium settings plus it's laggy. Get a computer that can run crysis before posting crap like this.
Absolutely UT3 is fuckin great the best twitch shooter Ive played in recent time with unmatched Multiplayer Visuals & framerate & Crysis is a Breathtaking solo fps with the greatest solo Fps visuals & physics Ive ever experienced.
dude just because unreal made the unreal engine doesn't mean u can only make futuristic games. the unreal engine is a step ahead of all engines. with its shader detail and 3d effects and its used by hundreds of studios making all different kinds of games.
they just released a newer version of the engine which puts it well ahead of the competition
hey did i EVER say anything about unreal engine being good for ONLY futuristic games? i believe not. i have played AA3 and it runs pretty dam nice, but cryengine has detail that at some points is incomparable, and cryengine 3 is just nearly unbeatable.
ut engine 3 rulz! cry engine2 hmm, not bad. i played crysis and ut3. ut3 have more efects, rays, ligths, explosions but cry, supports best video with dx 10..
Unreal Engine 3 is realy good, but CryEngine 2 is better. CryEngine 2 support DirectX10 and UT3 only DX9. UT3 Engine has bigger comfort on lower systems. CryEngine 2 is revolution and has much potential for future. And what are you saying on to Scimitar Engine? (Sorry for my english)
The latest release is the Unreal Engine 3, which is designed around Microsoft's DirectX 9 technology for 32/64-bit Windows XP/Windows Vista/Windows 7 and Xbox 360 platforms, DirectX 10 and DirectX 11 for 32/64-bit Windows Vista/Windows 7, and OpenGL for 32/64-bit Linux, Mac OS X and PlayStation 3.
Going by what that says, UE3 supports DX11. Also i'm beginning work with the UDK(Google it), it supports SM5.0 and DX11.
Hard to say which is better. Do you prefer the spacey look of Unreal or the more realistic look of farcry? But even Unreal can be made to look more realistic. Look at America's Army.
The more important question is which engine is easiest to work with? The Unreal engine comes with very good tools that can get you up and running with your own custom maps in only hours. Can this be done with Farcry? I don't care how good the engine is if I can't utilize it in my projects.
Gears of War is a better example of unreal engine's potential.
I'd say that Unreal Engine is far better than cry-engine. Sure you can get better results from cry-engine, but you need all the latest stuff to play it at that high graphics. Unreal Engine has a smart solution which makes it playable on most computers, so I find that one to be a winner.
if you are trying to say the fact that unreal engine is better as it can run on a much lower spec, take a look at the source engine. much larger draw distances, and although its a bit dated, its still made to run exceptionally well. crysis is an enthuasiasts game, and the cryengine is an enthusiasts engine. you cant really compare the two as unreal engine has terrible draw distances and loading times, however as you say, crysis takes a lot of power and specs. every engine has a weak spot, :)
I personally like the set of games Unreal engine has created, Gears of War, Bioshock, of course UT3, medal of honor, and army of two. Another good point towards unreal engine is that it can make movies as well. If anyone is familiar with the children's show "Lazytown" it was made with Unreal engine, no joke. Check the site for confirmation. HOWEVER, when it comes to graphics, CryEngine 2 is the best only second to the MegaTexturing of Id Tech 5, which is creating the graphics powerhouse RAGE.
we cant compre them...console and pc is not the same... but cryengine 2 is better in all domain (but i must admit that im impressed by the unreal texture cause console lack good amount of video memory)
The thing about Cry-engine, is it feels too nerf gun, and not enough shotgun. It looks nice, but firing weapons feels like your shooting nerf darts. It also has some texture popping but UE has that also. Overall Cryengine is one of the best out there right now, but fanboys need to get off their asses, and show some respect for the other stuff.
i think that maybe they do that purposefully in Crysis to show how the guns have less effect on someone in a powered battle suit that a common soldier, it adds to the atmosphere
How can you compare engines that generate two completely different visual styles?
I DO like UE's skin better. Crysis's skin looks too flat. In fact, a lot of Cryengine's stuff looks REALLY flat. That's what happens when you use too much ambient lighting. All definite light sources dissapear.
That's not the engine's fault though.... It's the artist's fault. Huh. Unless you can get an identacle test map to run on both engines, theres to way to compare.
Crysis's motion blur kicks everyone else's ASS. MB is a very important feature when dealing with fast paced games, and it helps when EVERYTHING has MB, and not just camera movement.
I turn it down just enough to be noticable, but not impare gameplay. Besides, MB adds a nice trail to fast moving objects. A grenade with motion blur is easier to follow because there's basically a line following it everywhere. Without MB it just seeps to majically teleport to it's destination. This pretty much goes for all fast moving objects.
Yep. A test map with all possibble settings put into one. An office, a jungle, a beach, and futuristic corridors. The lighting, geometry, textures, and effects would need to be IDENTACLE for a fair comparison. Someone do it.
Will a PCI 8400GS be able to play this? Even at minimum settings and with maybe 20fps?
My cousin bought that card because I told him it was a pretty good PCI card (he only has PCI slots) and so he ordered it, but I dont know that it will play this
You can't rely compare the 2. Both are good on their own ways.
The Unreal Engine 3 was made for performance and rely gory games and the Cry Engine 2 was made for outstanding DX10 graphics and well pretty much boring games.
I one can run UT3 on my 7600 GS (Overclocked to 625 Core Clock and 475 Memory clock) on 1280 x 1024 every detail set to max with VSync off and Crysis berly on 800 x 600 with details set to medium/low.
in my opinion Cry-engine is too plastic, i dont feel these weapons shooting, but in fact, it is able to show huge areas, is great for games like Crysis, but needs very tough computer... Its hrard to compare these both, each has adventages... both are good for me.
Very good video, i enjoy this remix from Resident Evil :)
Thanks, I actually looked it up last night, and found out it's the Edward Carnby mix to boot. Still, such a kick-ass song. Frigging love it, thanks for posting this vid up.
BTW, both engines look fantastic. The Crysis engine is obviously more graphics intensive, but I love Unreal's scalability, UT3 looks and runs great on my rig.
Crytech's runs at a much smoother framerate. . The truth IS that CRYENGINE is a better operating system. (look at the new Cryengine 3, search for it there is a video right here on youtube.
YOU PEOPLE! This is a comparison of two games! One gives an awesome preformance and other gives an awesome graphics! They both have ups and downs but its just a comparison! So stop giving bad comments and make a better video than this IF YOU CAN! Awesome work Loren!
Go to hell, you don't tell what my comments should be like, if you don't want these comments, you better get an appropriate title for the video, this is a comparison between games, not engines, and it is a comparison, the better reason to debate. Moron.
CryEngine probably technically better, but when it's comes to the art direction and gameplay, usually CE games lack all of the fun that UE games have.
I think that realism shouldn't be a goal for video games. However in my opinion UT3's graphic style is really out of the line too, it's way too chaotic without any real reason.
(I tried to switch to CryEngine2 after years of modding to UE1&2, but finally i just ended up learning the UE3, and not because of some sentimentalistic reason.)
Cry Engine 2 is much more realistic then Unreal Engine 3.
But I would prefer using Unreal Engine 3 for interiors and Cry Engine 2 for out side landscape with terrains etc. I also find it easier to Import/Use Assets in Unreal Engine 3
Remember this everoyne, EPIC likes to keep stable frames. They can pull off shit that crytek masturbates to, AND have better framework, AND gameplay. Crysis doesn't have THAT great of graphics, I've played it, seen it, and played it on a gtx 295...
Jeder der mal Crysis auf voller auflösung gespielt hat weiss dass das so ziemlich das geilste ist was es bisjetzt von der grafik her gibt. Einfach nur geil. da kommt kein Unreal Tech. ran
ofc cryengine is the best engine at this time.....unreal engine has almost zero shadows ffs.....unreal engine has only one good....the graphics-perforamnce ratio, with mid end pc's you can maximize it and run the game smoothly, in exchange with cryengine which needs a pretty strong pc to run it maximized.....but as we talk about Visual comparison ofcourse cryengine is waaaaay better than unreal engine....
for an effective comparision you should have place both images side to side (no matter the "pressure" effect) and try to find similar situations.
All we can say is the the landscape in CryEngine is active whereas the Unreal one is "stuck"... but it's understandable for a "full metal planet" like it.
Anyway, i love the music you used, what is it ? where is it from ?
....but like gtamike said if Crysis took place in a city then it might look weird & dumb. It will kinda sux. It might look a bit like F.E.A.R. 2 Project Origin type. That's wat I think but well Crytek always had their games take place in beautiful scenario places like Far Cry 2 in Africa & Crysis in a Tropical Island hopefully they won't make a mistake puttin it in a city or if they do hope it gonna be tight!
To my opinion, Cry Engine 2 beats Unreal Engine. Cry Engine is more realistic & has more detailed textures. I'm not sayin Unreal Engine is bad either. I luv Unreal Tournament 3 & it's tha best classic FPS Shooter (best online) but graphic-wise obiously Cry Engine 2 beats it. Something bout Unreal Engine seems off but in Cry Engine 2 everything looks pretty damn detailed & perfect espically in Ultra Settings & since now they makin Cry Engine 3 it gonna be OFF DA HOOK!!!
Yes maybe because there engine is better and the graphics are very good but the gameplay is stupid all you do is go around with made up weapons that like a 3 year old made it and nobody even dies they just respawn sniping isnt good in that game i cant name a single thing that was good about it
Unreal engine 3 is best, Cryengine looks very generic, many other developers have engines similiar to cryengines, Sony for one, and the Avalance engine, Unreal engine is best because i have yet to see anyone come close to looking like it, any one can surpass cryengine at any time unreal already did
Cry engine is better.
720henrique 3 days ago
@elar55 well thats because im more outside instead of playing games inside
lorenzo1234567891011 2 weeks ago
ur shit PC cant even run cryengine i see 5 fps there l0l cryengine ftw
elar55 2 weeks ago
@elar55 i got a life u kno :)
lorenzo1234567891011 2 weeks ago
@lorenzo1234567891011 ur fallen behind that term is annoyingly old.
elar55 2 weeks ago
Is this a joke?
MrEvol94 6 months ago
UT3 definitely wins
CombineSpecre300 7 months ago
i think is UE3.
TheMrsb44 8 months ago
I would rather play crysis with the UT engine, cus my computer has trouble running crysis.
xy274 9 months ago
I highly doubt unreal engine could run the same map as Crysis. Please note the interactive maps and large amount of effects.
Lasergun45 9 months ago
Unreal Engine is the leading engine and will always be.. Unreal is more open with its stuff also. Unreal Developement Kit is given away for free.. Means more games and more fame for Unreal Engine 3.. Crytek will never reach Epic Games class.. Never ever!
atica1337 9 months ago
UNREAL ENGINE 3 JUST A ENGINE FOR FLASH GAMES OF INTERNET :PP
capatais777 10 months ago
No comparison Unreal wins again.
losepocket 10 months ago
Unreal engine wins it all the way. It does everything better except it's tools for creating vast landscapes(which it can do, just not as easily). Unreal is focused more on closed environments. A lot of people are saying it's better for futuristic games, this is total BS. Just because people use the unreal engine to make sci-fi games doesn't mean thats all it can do. There are many realistic games on the unreal engine, they just sucked, not because of the engine, but because of the developers.
MrGrimshad 11 months ago
Well, You cant necesarily make games with cryengine, its a farcry/crysis mod and its not standalone, Unreal is standalone.
rocknroll980 11 months ago
CRYENGINE 2 is BEAST!!! Unreal Engine just got raped
xoxoEmuhxoxo 1 year ago
Which engine would be better for designing a Call of Duty type game, Unreal engine or Cryengine?
kennyb010 1 year ago
@kennyb010 Cry Engine cause COD is based on modern days if u talking about a COD MW game so the graphics of cryengine would be realistic like almost in real life, unreal engine is for futuristic games.
LunaTiC1235 1 year ago
what game is on unreal???
borkogamerr 1 year ago
how about the two companies creating a Cryreal engine, that way we can have realistic and futuristic games with the fps of the Unreal engine, not so heavy grapx as the cryengine 2!
shadowpowertimesand 1 year ago 4
@shadowpowertimesand i wish they did that, its a great idea though.
lorenzo1234567891011 1 year ago
i pesonally like the unreal engine better.
its a little bias but i like it better because thats what my company uses
they wouldnt let us get our hands on the CE3 because we are an indie developer of 7.
checkout ourgame coming around early june.
imangekyo 1 year ago
crysis hands down!!
AWACStunderhead 1 year ago
I reckon Unreal for consoles Cry Engine for PC
AzaIndustries 1 year ago
All of u guys are crazy the CryEngine looks way better
xLilCuzzo420x 1 year ago
atleast you can PLAY unreal without out a £3000 computer lol or atleast without lags
TR4Alwayz 1 year ago
@TR4Alwayz If you build it yourself it won't cost you $3,000 and won't lag either like Gears of War does. Don't get me wrong I love Gears. But Crysis looks better in my opinion.
DreamSparksLLC 1 year ago
@TR4Alwayz my PC cost 800$ AU and I can run crysis at max settings 1920x1200....
AzaIndustries 1 year ago
@AzaIndustries
lol my geforce 5200 GT 128mb can run unreal engine 3.8 on maximun settings 2560x1600 16xAA :)
i no can play crysis using 5200... and i can the unreal on max seetings... :)
my geforce 9500 GT destroy the unreal engine... and my geforce 9500 GT is a wood card on crysis :O
capatais777 1 year ago
@capatais777 and?...
AzaIndustries 1 year ago
@AzaIndustries crysis is much better graphics :P
capatais777 11 months ago
@capatais777 so?
AzaIndustries 11 months ago
uhhh this is OUTDATED cry engine 3 is comming
Baldoxxx4000 1 year ago
cry engine 3 is more of a compatibility and efficiency upgrade, mainly so that it may run on consoles. although im sure it will have a graphic update as well, at least for the pc, it probably wont be much.
themen99 1 year ago
right and wrong, the graphics will atually be downgraded to run better on consoles
reaper53772 1 year ago
not really considering that cryengine 3 is a downgraded version of cryengine 2 because cryengine 2 is too demanding for consoles
reaper53772 1 year ago
@reaper53772
actually no. It is upgraded on the pc, it has a few new features like deferred lighting, incredible physics, facial animation, true building destructibility (the walls break this time, no primitively welded scraps of metal simply coming apart) and the like.
Sadly though, the console versions suck...so hard. It doesn't even have subsurface scattering, and now cryshit 2 doesn't even take place in the jungle cuz of this damn console compatibility shit.
rolln2013 1 year ago
why do i have a feeling that ppl have never heard about chrome engine 4 which call of juarez: bound in blood uses. Chrome engine 4 already looks better than unreal engine 4.
L4veyan 1 year ago
Sry, unreal engine 3*
L4veyan 1 year ago
unreal engine 3 gives more eye candy then what cry engine 2 does thats what igot out of this video atleast... but i would like to see how cry engine 3 vs unreal engine 3 ... :)
zkear0n 2 years ago
they are doing unreal engine 4 and gears 3 is going to use that I hope
MegaD00M1 2 years ago
unreal engine is the 1st world engine and it has first place even at moddb , by the way cryengine is powerful too but unreal engine is unreal lol
ReacticFlyer 2 years ago
is thw 1st cuz its cheaper n easy 2 configure :L in my opinion unreal engine is good but not enough 2 b comparable w/cry engine
cjit26 2 years ago
totally 2 diferent types of engine Unreal is more about gloss light and arcade style were Crytek is more about environment realism lights shadows
Newbpwng 2 years ago
Poor comparison. Video barely scratches the surface of crysis visuals and looks like low res and medium settings plus it's laggy. Get a computer that can run crysis before posting crap like this.
562135 2 years ago
Unreal Engine 3 wins i love it
NastyShoes 2 years ago 3
i liked the unreal engine 3 best :D
aslakfirstman 2 years ago
btw...ur laggin on the crysis vids :P
Mafiadude1 2 years ago 14
Thank you for telling me. i didnt notice that.
lorenzo1234567891011 2 years ago
=))
bjohnblazkowicz 2 years ago
IMO the CryEngine uses WAYY too much CPU and GPU power...they could have done more work to optimise the amount of memory the engine takes up.
Mafiadude1 2 years ago
cry engine puts every single graphic detail on there games.
xy274 2 years ago
Gears of War is way better
DaniMyName 2 years ago
gears of war takes no skill. Unreal tournament is one of the most skill requiering games of all time. So is Streetfighter.
andollio1337 2 years ago
gears of war uses unreal engine too.
xy274 2 years ago 2
Im not gonna say wtf is this, BUT..
How can you compare a space game to a island game ? :P
Its like comparing a ice cream to molten lava :)
bmsfx 2 years ago 3
What matters when choosing wich engine to use is to know if your going to make an ultra-realistic or imaginarie kind of game world
FordowOriginal 2 years ago
to tell you the truth both games are good...
maning04 2 years ago 3
Absolutely UT3 is fuckin great the best twitch shooter Ive played in recent time with unmatched Multiplayer Visuals & framerate & Crysis is a Breathtaking solo fps with the greatest solo Fps visuals & physics Ive ever experienced.
KillaNoxious 2 years ago
ut engine is very good for futuristic games. Cryengine is good for ultra realistic games. that basically sums it up =)
Duskrunner291 2 years ago 10
@Duskrunner291
Really nice comment mate ;) +1
Pisquounet 2 years ago
dude just because unreal made the unreal engine doesn't mean u can only make futuristic games. the unreal engine is a step ahead of all engines. with its shader detail and 3d effects and its used by hundreds of studios making all different kinds of games.
they just released a newer version of the engine which puts it well ahead of the competition
hunter1st1st 2 years ago
hey did i EVER say anything about unreal engine being good for ONLY futuristic games? i believe not. i have played AA3 and it runs pretty dam nice, but cryengine has detail that at some points is incomparable, and cryengine 3 is just nearly unbeatable.
Duskrunner291 2 years ago
@Duskrunner291 it's unreal engine. not ut engine. secondly ue3 can make any setting of game. infact any engine can.
BigdogWitBigdog 1 year ago
i found that unreal delivers better and shiner graphics and cryengine is more realistic ...
ezuan88 2 years ago
ut engine 3 rulz! cry engine2 hmm, not bad. i played crysis and ut3. ut3 have more efects, rays, ligths, explosions but cry, supports best video with dx 10..
bytes.-
zombiieboy 2 years ago
yes but there is a new video for
CryEngine3
and its pretty badass
mrfrosty8172 2 years ago
crysis so far..
CastroL94 2 years ago
bad recorder on ut 3 and you don t have all the mods and the titan pack
TheTamerAndGamer 2 years ago
cryengine wins!!!!!
cainsean 2 years ago
Unreal Engine 3 is realy good, but CryEngine 2 is better. CryEngine 2 support DirectX10 and UT3 only DX9. UT3 Engine has bigger comfort on lower systems. CryEngine 2 is revolution and has much potential for future. And what are you saying on to Scimitar Engine? (Sorry for my english)
spirocz 2 years ago
Unreal engine also supports dx10 look at gears of war....
GamingFr34k 2 years ago 3
CryEngine 3 rapes both of them
look up the new vid for it just came out
mrfrosty8172 2 years ago
DX11(check the wiki).
tenshitaiakuma 1 year ago
Read this line from the Unreal Engine wiki:
The latest release is the Unreal Engine 3, which is designed around Microsoft's DirectX 9 technology for 32/64-bit Windows XP/Windows Vista/Windows 7 and Xbox 360 platforms, DirectX 10 and DirectX 11 for 32/64-bit Windows Vista/Windows 7, and OpenGL for 32/64-bit Linux, Mac OS X and PlayStation 3.
Going by what that says, UE3 supports DX11. Also i'm beginning work with the UDK(Google it), it supports SM5.0 and DX11.
tenshitaiakuma 1 year ago
C'mon write more tags youtard.
gipsy15 2 years ago
HAH! Oh god, that bird in the end - so unexpected! <3
MannyTridrake 2 years ago
Hard to say which is better. Do you prefer the spacey look of Unreal or the more realistic look of farcry? But even Unreal can be made to look more realistic. Look at America's Army.
The more important question is which engine is easiest to work with? The Unreal engine comes with very good tools that can get you up and running with your own custom maps in only hours. Can this be done with Farcry? I don't care how good the engine is if I can't utilize it in my projects.
gator33 2 years ago
thats a stupid comparison UT have a dark side and crysis is more jungle more color and so on
air1up2there 2 years ago
Gears of War is a better example of unreal engine's potential.
I'd say that Unreal Engine is far better than cry-engine. Sure you can get better results from cry-engine, but you need all the latest stuff to play it at that high graphics. Unreal Engine has a smart solution which makes it playable on most computers, so I find that one to be a winner.
Zoeres 2 years ago 2
if you are trying to say the fact that unreal engine is better as it can run on a much lower spec, take a look at the source engine. much larger draw distances, and although its a bit dated, its still made to run exceptionally well. crysis is an enthuasiasts game, and the cryengine is an enthusiasts engine. you cant really compare the two as unreal engine has terrible draw distances and loading times, however as you say, crysis takes a lot of power and specs. every engine has a weak spot, :)
souperman12345 2 years ago
I personally like the set of games Unreal engine has created, Gears of War, Bioshock, of course UT3, medal of honor, and army of two. Another good point towards unreal engine is that it can make movies as well. If anyone is familiar with the children's show "Lazytown" it was made with Unreal engine, no joke. Check the site for confirmation. HOWEVER, when it comes to graphics, CryEngine 2 is the best only second to the MegaTexturing of Id Tech 5, which is creating the graphics powerhouse RAGE.
insaneh4 2 years ago
Why is the Crysis part so laggy?
MouthofSaurons 2 years ago
u call this a comparison vid? wtf u use unreal tournament 3 compare with crysis!? u idiot!
PeterTechGuy 2 years ago
lol runing crysis in medium xD
Fokogrilo 2 years ago 3
And dont forget, the ut engine is runs 5x better in the same pc...
dnbRoller 2 years ago
UT engine is awesome.
dnbRoller 2 years ago
Both are amazing, but i think Cryengine takes the cake.
darfkloyd 2 years ago 5
agreed the Crytek is still a benchmark setter after all this time
Daracus 2 years ago
well its kind of hard to to since the quality is crap
spartan2381 2 years ago 3
Wtf...? Unreal Tournament is not the same as Unreal Engine -.- 1 star.
MagnusRulerHardt 2 years ago 4
retard they made unreal tournament with unreal game engine
DarkHaschen 2 years ago
STILL. It's not like all games made with 3D GameStudio share the same graphics.
MagnusRulerHardt 2 years ago
Unreal Tournoment 3 is not close to the limits of Unreal Engine.
You should do it with Gears of War 2.
:\
Harelgur 2 years ago
I really think Cryengine is betta but Unreal is pretty gud too
cripkilla191 2 years ago
Great vid! Plus for having Tiësto!
Ratchet92 2 years ago
we cant compre them...console and pc is not the same... but cryengine 2 is better in all domain (but i must admit that im impressed by the unreal texture cause console lack good amount of video memory)
mat967 2 years ago
Unreal Tournament 3 has the best textures and bump mapping, Crysis has the best lighting effects and physics.
grantlm 2 years ago 4
The thing about Cry-engine, is it feels too nerf gun, and not enough shotgun. It looks nice, but firing weapons feels like your shooting nerf darts. It also has some texture popping but UE has that also. Overall Cryengine is one of the best out there right now, but fanboys need to get off their asses, and show some respect for the other stuff.
oloompop 2 years ago
i think that maybe they do that purposefully in Crysis to show how the guns have less effect on someone in a powered battle suit that a common soldier, it adds to the atmosphere
Shukkoku 2 years ago
Than why do the guns recoil on the suit? If you explanation is true, than crysis fucked up even more than I thought.
oloompop 2 years ago
it also feels that was in farcry it's not that bad it's just a nit pick imo
theluisanator 2 years ago
great vid :D
the ut engine is rly smooth
but the cryengine :/
NightStrikeKill 2 years ago
How can you compare engines that generate two completely different visual styles?
I DO like UE's skin better. Crysis's skin looks too flat. In fact, a lot of Cryengine's stuff looks REALLY flat. That's what happens when you use too much ambient lighting. All definite light sources dissapear.
That's not the engine's fault though.... It's the artist's fault. Huh. Unless you can get an identacle test map to run on both engines, theres to way to compare.
masterpiraka 2 years ago
BUT--
Crysis's motion blur kicks everyone else's ASS. MB is a very important feature when dealing with fast paced games, and it helps when EVERYTHING has MB, and not just camera movement.
masterpiraka 2 years ago
Yeah but many people like me turn MB off so we have an advantage over players who have a blurry screen.
oloompop 2 years ago
I turn it down just enough to be noticable, but not impare gameplay. Besides, MB adds a nice trail to fast moving objects. A grenade with motion blur is easier to follow because there's basically a line following it everywhere. Without MB it just seeps to majically teleport to it's destination. This pretty much goes for all fast moving objects.
masterpiraka 2 years ago
that would be very instresting to watch...
gothikgamer 2 years ago
Yep. A test map with all possibble settings put into one. An office, a jungle, a beach, and futuristic corridors. The lighting, geometry, textures, and effects would need to be IDENTACLE for a fair comparison. Someone do it.
masterpiraka 2 years ago
Actually. With the Cry engine to Unreal Engine, you can't do a comparison.Unreal Torunament 2007 you can play it on (almost) every PC. Crysis not.
Crysis UP
UT DOWN
SilkroadLegendROCK 2 years ago
isnt unreal engine 3 the engine that made gears of war?anyway i think cryengine 2 is better but i like the look of the gears series better.
bluegama500 2 years ago
ye GOW2 used the new Unreal engine ;)
lorenzo1234567891011 2 years ago
Will a PCI 8400GS be able to play this? Even at minimum settings and with maybe 20fps?
My cousin bought that card because I told him it was a pretty good PCI card (he only has PCI slots) and so he ordered it, but I dont know that it will play this
MaxiMachine 2 years ago
well you could always download the demos to find out :)
lorenzo1234567891011 2 years ago
Comment removed
neilbey18 2 years ago
You can't rely compare the 2. Both are good on their own ways.
The Unreal Engine 3 was made for performance and rely gory games and the Cry Engine 2 was made for outstanding DX10 graphics and well pretty much boring games.
I one can run UT3 on my 7600 GS (Overclocked to 625 Core Clock and 475 Memory clock) on 1280 x 1024 every detail set to max with VSync off and Crysis berly on 800 x 600 with details set to medium/low.
R4Zy3L 2 years ago
in my opinion Cry-engine is too plastic, i dont feel these weapons shooting, but in fact, it is able to show huge areas, is great for games like Crysis, but needs very tough computer... Its hrard to compare these both, each has adventages... both are good for me.
Very good video, i enjoy this remix from Resident Evil :)
RnE6 2 years ago
Crysis is little bit better.
freidian 2 years ago
The Unreal engine is more practical and not a resource hog
Amebixfan 2 years ago
i very much agree
dontkillthemetal 2 years ago
What is the name of the song in this vid? I love it!
IcedEarthaholic 2 years ago
Tiësto - Alone in the dark
lorenzo1234567891011 2 years ago
Thanks, I actually looked it up last night, and found out it's the Edward Carnby mix to boot. Still, such a kick-ass song. Frigging love it, thanks for posting this vid up.
BTW, both engines look fantastic. The Crysis engine is obviously more graphics intensive, but I love Unreal's scalability, UT3 looks and runs great on my rig.
IcedEarthaholic 2 years ago
GREAT VIDEO MAN!!!!!!!! Exactly the comparison I was looking for.
mph1985man 2 years ago
Crytech's runs at a much smoother framerate. . The truth IS that CRYENGINE is a better operating system. (look at the new Cryengine 3, search for it there is a video right here on youtube.
mph1985man 2 years ago
the unreal engine is much smoother then the Ce2
NightStrikeKill 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
☻/
/▌
/ \
This is Lorenzo. Copy and paste Lorenzo soon he will take over youtube
indolicious1994 2 years ago
YOU PEOPLE! This is a comparison of two games! One gives an awesome preformance and other gives an awesome graphics! They both have ups and downs but its just a comparison! So stop giving bad comments and make a better video than this IF YOU CAN! Awesome work Loren!
GameAgentReviews 2 years ago
Go to hell, you don't tell what my comments should be like, if you don't want these comments, you better get an appropriate title for the video, this is a comparison between games, not engines, and it is a comparison, the better reason to debate. Moron.
hectormacias 2 years ago 2
Cryengine2 ass fucks unreal in the ass giving it a huge rapture.
Tombes123456 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CryEngine probably technically better, but when it's comes to the art direction and gameplay, usually CE games lack all of the fun that UE games have.
I think that realism shouldn't be a goal for video games. However in my opinion UT3's graphic style is really out of the line too, it's way too chaotic without any real reason.
(I tried to switch to CryEngine2 after years of modding to UE1&2, but finally i just ended up learning the UE3, and not because of some sentimentalistic reason.)
ds024775r7 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
there is a look up cryengine3,
its demo just came out its so awsome, i cant wait till play new crysis <3 (i have em all :p)
m0hawk1dwarf 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Cry Engine 2 is much more realistic then Unreal Engine 3.
But I would prefer using Unreal Engine 3 for interiors and Cry Engine 2 for out side landscape with terrains etc. I also find it easier to Import/Use Assets in Unreal Engine 3
To bad Crysis game play wasn't very good : (
ToxeCryz 2 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
Remember this everoyne, EPIC likes to keep stable frames. They can pull off shit that crytek masturbates to, AND have better framework, AND gameplay. Crysis doesn't have THAT great of graphics, I've played it, seen it, and played it on a gtx 295...
XxPartlyPkerxX 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jeder der mal Crysis auf voller auflösung gespielt hat weiss dass das so ziemlich das geilste ist was es bisjetzt von der grafik her gibt. Einfach nur geil. da kommt kein Unreal Tech. ran
DepugnoSoldier 2 years ago
cryengine fucks unreal in the ass
MixedTracialArtist 2 years ago 5
ofcaurse the cryengine wins in all way
but the unreal engine is good too =)
HobyToy 2 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
You laaagggsss on crysis D:
brohana 2 years ago
crytek by far... thats like saying which is better.. dunkin dounuts or starbuck.. DD
229wilson 2 years ago
ofc cryengine is the best engine at this time.....unreal engine has almost zero shadows ffs.....unreal engine has only one good....the graphics-perforamnce ratio, with mid end pc's you can maximize it and run the game smoothly, in exchange with cryengine which needs a pretty strong pc to run it maximized.....but as we talk about Visual comparison ofcourse cryengine is waaaaay better than unreal engine....
Datte1989 2 years ago 2
for an effective comparision you should have place both images side to side (no matter the "pressure" effect) and try to find similar situations.
All we can say is the the landscape in CryEngine is active whereas the Unreal one is "stuck"... but it's understandable for a "full metal planet" like it.
Anyway, i love the music you used, what is it ? where is it from ?
t3dd7t 2 years ago
tiesto - alone in the dark
lorenzo1234567891011 2 years ago
Thanks. :-p
t3dd7t 2 years ago
lol you can't compare them
its like quake vs perfect dark
RealNeurotiq 2 years ago
a good comparison!
the best engines... but i think still, the ut is the better one, this team is so full of experience. always was... they always make the best engines
azzurres1 2 years ago
Gears of war+UNREAL ENGINE= AWESOMENESSSSSSSZZZZ
psihateyou1 2 years ago 2
this sucks.. u call this a comparision ?
theonexHD 2 years ago
....but like gtamike said if Crysis took place in a city then it might look weird & dumb. It will kinda sux. It might look a bit like F.E.A.R. 2 Project Origin type. That's wat I think but well Crytek always had their games take place in beautiful scenario places like Far Cry 2 in Africa & Crysis in a Tropical Island hopefully they won't make a mistake puttin it in a city or if they do hope it gonna be tight!
cripkilla191 2 years ago
i saw a video about cry engine 3 in a city and it looked allot like UT3 lol. it was so boring :P
lorenzo1234567891011 2 years ago
im pretty sure farcry uses the dunia engine there bro, no cryengine.
opuim123 2 years ago
I know tha but the creators are Crytek themselves. Crytek created Far Cry & Crysis. Im not talkin bout the Engine
cripkilla191 2 years ago
To my opinion, Cry Engine 2 beats Unreal Engine. Cry Engine is more realistic & has more detailed textures. I'm not sayin Unreal Engine is bad either. I luv Unreal Tournament 3 & it's tha best classic FPS Shooter (best online) but graphic-wise obiously Cry Engine 2 beats it. Something bout Unreal Engine seems off but in Cry Engine 2 everything looks pretty damn detailed & perfect espically in Ultra Settings & since now they makin Cry Engine 3 it gonna be OFF DA HOOK!!!
cripkilla191 2 years ago
crysis would pwn everygame if it would be set on a city, cryengine 2 adapts to everything
azazaza09 2 years ago
crysis is boring...
saibotmark 2 years ago 2
nice video, but aint really fair to put crysis in a small screen, is it ? (;
opponment1 2 years ago
watch the whole video :P
lorenzo1234567891011 2 years ago
better? i dont think so.
cry is better to fuck everything around us
unreal better for play online (to fuck everyone-shooter)
HOTzabol 2 years ago
but you drank?
much better is crysis
speransimo 2 years ago
Imo unreal looks ALOT more fun to play :D
sneakykiller800 2 years ago
ITS NOT!!!!!!!!
psihateyou1 2 years ago
How so?
sneakykiller800 2 years ago
Yes maybe because there engine is better and the graphics are very good but the gameplay is stupid all you do is go around with made up weapons that like a 3 year old made it and nobody even dies they just respawn sniping isnt good in that game i cant name a single thing that was good about it
psihateyou1 2 years ago
You really have to consider that Crytek toned down the Cryengine for fears that noone could play it. And It IS better than the UT3 engine.
FloatyPineapple 2 years ago
Unreal looks nice, but it's not really realistic to compare these 2 engines. CryEngine 2 on "Ultra Settings" looks unmatched by anything.
PointToBlank89 2 years ago
At 15fps?
Why do you think UEngine is used for so many games? Cause it provides awesome graphics at hi fps! that's why you can find it even on consoles.
it is really powerfull.
PoRRasturvaT 2 years ago
song?
qwertqwertman 2 years ago
Tiesto - alone in the dark
lorenzo1234567891011 2 years ago
Unreal engine 3 is best, Cryengine looks very generic, many other developers have engines similiar to cryengines, Sony for one, and the Avalance engine, Unreal engine is best because i have yet to see anyone come close to looking like it, any one can surpass cryengine at any time unreal already did
Eurocannibal 2 years ago
Crysis still has the best graphics even on high settings.
Gregoses 2 years ago
ye cry-engine 2 is waaaaay more realistic...ofcourse :p
lorenzo1234567891011 2 years ago
Unreal is better
Casev07 2 years ago
mmm
on the video crysys is with low fps and in medium settings, or maybe high with 800*640
anarcodani 2 years ago
its 800x600 and Very high, altough it looks like high. something went wrong when i rendered the video :(
but now you know :)
lorenzo1234567891011 2 years ago
Unfortunately both games suck even though they have good graphics.
MSAstinkt 2 years ago
why?
lorenzo1234567891011 2 years ago
Suck why? Did you even play either of them?
staggabob 2 years ago
since u can play unreal tournment easily on highest everything and it takes a beast of a pc for crysis.
SonyAdmire 2 years ago
yup.
lorenzo1234567891011 2 years ago
Buy better hardware and set Cryengine-settings to high-level.
Bartspritze 2 years ago
crysis is on very high, and yes my hardware sucks. if you wanna know what i have go over to my channel.
lorenzo1234567891011