Nice Video That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You Excerpts of NASA Administrator Charles Bolden speaking at a Sept. 14, 2011news conference at the Senate Dirksen Building,
Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing The boosterwill be America's most powerful since the Saturn V rocket that carried Apollo astronauts to the moon and will launch humans to places no one has gone before.
Thiokol Corporation and Lockheed Martin FAILED us with Shuttle. So why we are dealing with the same contractors with SLS is a total slap in the face to all people who care about progress.
If you buy a car and it ends up costing over 20 time what the dealer told it would cost and blows up 1/65 times you use it, are you going to buy from the same car company? If you did, you would be stupid. So why do we do it? Campaign contributions by the above contractors.
I see what you mean, but we need to constantly push our limits in technology and there is not as much stuff for our benefit on the moon compared to mars. And with asteroids they are farther and have a lot more ice than the moon so they could be refueling stations.
Its a shame to all Americans because the Falcon XX is so much better than this. Falcon XX would be able to lift more weight, would actually work, be safer, would be on time, on budget, have engines that can be TURNED OFF once started, be designed by America's best rocket talent, at a FIXED price (Which Lockheed will NEVER do!!!!).
The "Senate" Launch System (designed by Senators rather than rocket scientists) is just another rehashed Constellation that still uses old dangerous Shuttle parts. Same Shuttle parts, same cost over runs, lack of achievement, and just another welfare program.
@trfinck Not really we have been to the moon before and also it is close in a way. The public would be way more interested in going to mars. And the public's opinion is as important as the science that can take place in those locations.
Nice Video That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You Excerpts of NASA Administrator Charles Bolden speaking at a Sept. 14, 2011news conference at the Senate Dirksen Building,
fitnesus 3 weeks ago
I Really Like The Video From Your NASA Announces Design For New Deep Space Exploration System
lupabuatchannel 3 weeks ago
Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing The boosterwill be America's most powerful since the Saturn V rocket that carried Apollo astronauts to the moon and will launch humans to places no one has gone before.
cenedywong 3 weeks ago
i wanna go!!!!!!!!!!!! beam me up scotty!
matugman 1 month ago
Poor Charlie didn't want another blast for not meeting congress requirements.
The upper stage is a fairytale. What is really needed is the bottom part that launches Orion.
The problem is the upper stage is written into the law.
This is the only way Charlie could get out of this situation and he deserves a medal for it but you have to see it for what it really is.
JuggaloOzi 2 months ago in playlist More videos from SpaceVidsNet
I'm 100% behind NASA. Lets make it happen..
LancairPropJet 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
'
yeaa keep up NASA going to outer space,,,
no no need ussr russia,,,
no depend on ussr russia,,,
only JPL / NASA can going to do,,,
forget it about ussr russia,,,
american JPL / NASA can do it without ussr russia
bestamerica 4 months ago
that rocket look just like jupitar direct
90cdowns 4 months ago
Thiokol Corporation and Lockheed Martin FAILED us with Shuttle. So why we are dealing with the same contractors with SLS is a total slap in the face to all people who care about progress.
If you buy a car and it ends up costing over 20 time what the dealer told it would cost and blows up 1/65 times you use it, are you going to buy from the same car company? If you did, you would be stupid. So why do we do it? Campaign contributions by the above contractors.
ti994apc 5 months ago
explore to mars now..!
redpot026 5 months ago
You have to have the Right Stuff
KRadetzky 5 months ago
How do you even become an astronut? Are they all ex military?
rickythepitbull 5 months ago
I see what you mean, but we need to constantly push our limits in technology and there is not as much stuff for our benefit on the moon compared to mars. And with asteroids they are farther and have a lot more ice than the moon so they could be refueling stations.
spacegeek5 5 months ago
how about less flashy CGI animation and more REALITY in these projects
Joe35983 5 months ago
Its a shame to all Americans because the Falcon XX is so much better than this. Falcon XX would be able to lift more weight, would actually work, be safer, would be on time, on budget, have engines that can be TURNED OFF once started, be designed by America's best rocket talent, at a FIXED price (Which Lockheed will NEVER do!!!!).
ti994apc 5 months ago in playlist Space Launch System
The "Senate" Launch System (designed by Senators rather than rocket scientists) is just another rehashed Constellation that still uses old dangerous Shuttle parts. Same Shuttle parts, same cost over runs, lack of achievement, and just another welfare program.
ti994apc 5 months ago in playlist Space Launch System
BRING BACK THE X33 PROJECT! BRING IT BACK! WE DEMAND IT!
tehatemachine 5 months ago
we need to build a base on the moon
trfinck 5 months ago
@trfinck Not really we have been to the moon before and also it is close in a way. The public would be way more interested in going to mars. And the public's opinion is as important as the science that can take place in those locations.
spacegeek5 5 months ago
@spacegeek5 Yeah, but I mean, the moon is a more realistic goal to set, wouldn't you think?
trfinck 5 months ago
"anywhere beyond low earth orbit"
to the mass relays!
42crazyguy 5 months ago
This video is out of sync.
jacobsings 5 months ago
So cool I can't wait to see it launch I live in florida
airslayer123 5 months ago