The craziest thing about Karl is that tiny kernel of genius in all of his stupidity. There's something to be said for the argument that everything that comes before and after us is irrelevant to us in life, if you are arguing from a purely narcissistic point of view.
i have been listerning to these guys for about 10 years, and i can honestly say that they have been a major part of my life, they have made me laugh when im sad. Karl is a geninus but ricky and steve play a major part, it never ever gets boring............ thanks guys!
So who is this Karl guy... Honestly, someone tell me please. Either way, he's a natural comic... he's got great timing & is funny, even if he doesn't know it! XD
His name is Karl Pilkington. He used to be a radio producer for XFM London, in which Ricky and Stephen worked with him there for "The Ricky Gervais Show".
They coincidentally started asking him questions for some commentary during some of their shows and it took off from there, simply put.
Oh, crap. The look on Karl's face is priceless. Its a mix of sheer hostility and utter stupidity. I used to think Gervais was being mean to him. Now I understand. Gervais is restraining himself with a skill worthy of a Buddhist monk.
ricky gervais is a bully prick. he even doesn't know whats he talking a bout yet bullying pig shit. he tried to act cool but he is just a son of a bitch prick
@anakluhur It's called banter or winding people up. It's very common in the UK as a friendly thing to tease each other. Ricky and Karl are actually very good friends and frequently go out to dinner together with their significant others. It's also slightly exaggerated for comic effect.
@TheBluePianist wen did i ever say that? wen? It doesn't make any sense that the entire world celebrate a "fake" holiday. I can explain why god is real in more ways than just that, but think about it. The egyptians had their gods. The mayans had their gods. the muslims have their gods. Those are secluded groups though. They might be crazy. But there are people ALL OVER THE WORLD who believe in god. It isn't a culture thing, it's a logic thing.
@MethodicalMercenary the fact that you point out people all over the world believe in slightly different but very similar things is actually the definition of culture. it is not the same as logic, which is rational reasoning based on accurate presuppositions/axioms.
@TheBluePianist and im not saying i believe in god beause a lot of people do. how about this- do you honestly beleive that one cell magically became us? If u do, then u hav no idea how complex we are. It is literally the same thing as saying a bacteria cell would eventually become a whale. We had to come from somewhere. And how about instead of insulting me, u actually argue ur own case. I'd love to hear that
@MethodicalMercenary Evolution and God aren't mutually exclusive mate, we are that complex because it took billions of years to become what we are, if we appeared from one moment to another then you sound like an orthodox catholic. Many close minded people don't take in consideration that maybe to survive and become who we are, all those evolutionary sequences have to occur?
Plus you should do some theory of knowledge classes by saying that God = Logic lol
@acipswich I honestly dont understand what u are saying here. I just dont understand the way u explianed it. can u explain in another way, worded differently?
@MethodicalMercenary mmmm....you said above that you don't believe in evolution, i'm not arguing that, but many people see evolution as the opposit of God, and is not true. You deny the fact that from one cell, we "magically appear" (you def have no knowledge in scientific background so there's no issue in arguing something that I know and you don't), ok im cool with that, im just stating the fact that IF we came from a cell, that was an art of God, he planned it all the way.
@MethodicalMercenary you must be mentally ill right? I was just trying to say that those two theories aren't mutually exclusive......he created man but not how you think he did....it's sad how people nowadays are still so narrow minded about everything....no point of arguing with you if that's ur final answer lol
@acipswich well, u think ur brilliant. But now u say enough is enough becuase u hav nowhere else to go with this debate. There is NO reason to believe in a being such as God without a reference such a the Bible. OBVIOUSLY, I understand wat you are TRYING to say about the two not being exclusive (not sure why that wasn't clear enough already), but if the God is real so is the Bible (dont be an idiot by denying that). And it says in the Bible that MAN STARTED AS MAN.
@MethodicalMercenary the bible have so many mistakes, you should do some research about that :) as I just mentioned before, they were wrong in dating the universe, how would they know how we arrived to earth? they believed the earth was flat for crying out loud!! stop being so close minded and try to understand what i'm saying, stop throwing me all that bullshit, it wont work
@acipswich the fact that the earth is flat isn't a religious fact. Also, u clearly misinterpret many of the things that im writing here. When i said that not everything can be explained through logic, i wasn't referring to God. I was just putting that out there, because u just seem like a know it all. P.S. No one can date the earth.
Also, i kno im not an expert on the matter, and you certainly are. And id say ur not doing very well debating this with that being said
@MethodicalMercenary I know is not a religious fact, plus true, certainly we can't define when earth originated but trust me is not 5000 years ;) Can i quote you? "But there are people ALL OVER THE WORLD who believe in god. It isn't a culture thing, it's a logic thing" what do you mean with that then?
@acipswich i mean that in secluded societies (like cannibalistic easter island, or tribes that believe in sacrificial gifts) it makes sense that the union of people may hav some distinct and insane beliefs. However, Christianity is not an isolated case.
@MethodicalMercenary everything is "explained" through logic. the clue is in the definition of explain. Use a different word if you want to imply something different
@TheBluePianist Ok then. EXPLAIN THROUGH LOGIC FOR ME how the inhabitants of several ancient developments in the middle east were able to cut rocks weighing several tons with precision that cannot be matched with any technology or machinery that we possess today. Then tell me explain isn't the right word
@MethodicalMercenary Civilizations in the past were more civilized than what we are today. I believe in human degradation and what we were before, we will never be the same. Materialistic people exist and will always exist, that makes me sad because i'm one more in this globalized world so what you just stated is true, no-one can explain that. You can't either, so don't play your God card here mate, is not gonna work....is funny cause every thing you don't know, you will say it was God
the word your looking for is maths. it is logical, go study it yourself.
we still use maths today. we can measure with quantifiable accuracy at atomic unit precision. I also refute your claim because the "ancient..." wouldn't even be able to record such number of significant figures, let alone be aware of the concept.
sigh. this is getting dull, keep feeding me and ill keep correcting for a little bit.
@MethodicalMercenary untill you give me a historic reference then yes, duh. im wearing something on my torso at the moment, it has the function of maintaining body heat has two arms and a collar, explain to me what it is. You would not be able to tell me the fabric composition of the item, but you will make a rational conclusion that its an item of clothing.
why, are you trying to argue that greeks used to measure weight by praying? (ignoring the wrong part of your claim)
@TheBluePianist wat are u on about? where did you get that from? greeks used to measure weight by praying... stop putting words in my mouth thank you.
@TheBluePianist that is the definition of explain as according to websters. If websters isn't professional enough for you, then nothing is. Now, as i siad before, not eveything can be EXPLAINED, or MADE KNOWN through logic. Learn the English language before u criticize me for not knoing the advanced of scientific concepts. This conversation is over becuase u refuse to let it go anywhere
@MethodicalMercenary you are self defeating. read your own definition, point 3.
As for your point, that ancient greeks can determine weight. this is an illogical statement. It certainly does not imply there is no logic to the method that greeks used (since you asked me "how"). I made a logical step by stating that maths was the mechanism used (i cannot be more specific without using low probabilities. If you give me a reference, i might be able to read the mechanism to you)
@TheBluePianist what about point 3? that wasn't the definition of explain i was using. u do realize words can hav separate meanings right? And i NEVER said they can weigh rocks. Here we go again with ur poor understanding of english. I said that they "cut rocks weighing several tons with precision." We know today that those rocks weighed several tons. I NEVER said that they knew that
@MethodicalMercenary if i grant you a few points that i disagree with, then even so..
are you arguing that ancient precise rock cutting is unexplainable, or that there is currently no explanation. if the first, then in order for me to credit you with anything, you will need to give me a reference, otherwise, as i argued for weighing, a rational explanation is that the thing doesn't exist.
If this is regular, find something with a reference
@MethodicalMercenary which definition were you using then, imo point 3 implies 1 and 2, and is slightly more specific.
and the butterfly pattern is explained through changes in food consumption and the affect of this on hormones. i found this through a quick internet search. if your familiar with hormones, physiology and migration, the pattern is explained, or has an associated method of logical reasoning.
@MethodicalMercenary everything has the potential to have its logical reasoning made known. some things are not currently known, god is not one of those things. When people say god, they are not referring to chicken soup, they are referring to a specific human-like entity. e.g. you give him gender-like qualities, intent, and possessions. you cannot refute these because you use them too frequently, these words are appropriate for the frequency (as are all definitions of words
@TheBluePianist it is real that animals live largely off of instinct. I can't think of a very good specific example off the top of my head, but one example would be the migrating patterns of the monarch butterfly. It cannot be explained (who cares if explained is the right word in this instance, u kno wat i mean) HOW they know (in other words, they know from instinct, but how do they have that instinct?), but they know
@MethodicalMercenary i'm not going to argue any further because this is such a waste but i will try one more time.
for the rock cutting i decided to find a reference myself after all that
another quick search, blogger says there are several explanations but focuses on it being hushing which it goes on to explain is better than modern silicon.
i don't do geo sciences and history more than i have to, but im assuming you can rebuke this by time period or something
@MethodicalMercenary LOL, can you contradict yourself more? you started saying that believing in GOD is logic, that is probably the most retarded comment i've heard in my life
@MethodicalMercenary lol also is funny how you state that the blue pianist has no knowledge in how complex we are. If you analyse even the smallest and less evolved cells, you can find out so many similar features and at the same time how complex they are on there own ways. You can argue the philosophical part but don't play you scientific card lol you have no clue.
@acipswich i meant to ask you a question, and i guess i forgot to post it, but in your theory, what is the first "piece" of matter that is the origin of our existece?
@MethodicalMercenary The baryons, which started with the cooling and expansion of the universe. According to the bible, earth is like 5000 years old, do you agree with that? Many things can be interpreted in the bible in different ways, and I believe your way is wrong. I got a question for you, back up your point of God Created us, how did we appear?
@MethodicalMercenary I have studied science for many years, i honestly believe that eukaryotes developed over time. and multicellular species became organised tissue. I suggest you do the same before using the word "magic" to represent studies be people who have devoted their life to attempt to understand what happens in the face of religious persecution, mainly death to non-believers.
@TheBluePianist well, wat are the chances of us becoming what we are from eukaryotes? I dont hav to study science to understand that the odds of that happening are phenomically and pretty much inexplicably miniscule. Odds that are well beyond our comprehension (similarly to how we cannot comprehend wat exactly "eternity" is, if u kno wat it mean). With that being said, i label that as "magic."
@MethodicalMercenary That is correct, lets say the chances of conditions of a planet being capable of what we term "life" are 1 in a billion. That is why when we look at a billion planets, only one of them has life on it. -.-
You can go much smaller than cells lol, replicating sugar and phosphates mixed together in lipids is all you need for what we consider as the definition as life.
I COULD not be a camera man for them. It'd be impossible. "CUT! For fuck's sake, somebody get that camera guy to stop laughing! He's screwing up the material!"
Watching Ricky and Karl is a bit like a football match. You need the build-up and the prematch excitement to get everything they speak about. You know watching a match from half-time onwards is good because it's your team, but you don't get the whole picture. It's clever and funny on so many levels as everything they speak of is related. The links are brilliant and if you have watched the 'Ricky V Karl' match from the start, there's a big difference. Work that garble of shite out you kunts.
I love this so much. Maybe I'm loosing my marbles a bit, but to me this is like a modern version of this ancient greek bloke, who wrote all this long conversations.
Ok we share 70% of our genetic material with a slug. So that means that 70% is really insignificant when you observe all the differences between a human and a slug. It's the 30% that matters. It's the marshmallows in the Lucky Charms, the soy sauce in a bowl of rice, that gives the "flavor" to the "meal". A painting is mostly canvas. It's the oil that completes the masterpiece.
the armchair phillospher Gervais talking nonsense again.
CT2507 7 hours ago
"get out!"
MrWhipification 11 hours ago
i don't know what you're doing, are you just saying words? lmfao
tools747 1 day ago
Get out!
overdrive360 1 day ago
"You can't go back with pants on!"
Don't know why that's so funny to me.
Liamthegreat2008 2 days ago
The craziest thing about Karl is that tiny kernel of genius in all of his stupidity. There's something to be said for the argument that everything that comes before and after us is irrelevant to us in life, if you are arguing from a purely narcissistic point of view.
BanThisChannel 2 days ago
Is that the term for a group of slugs, a gang? A gaggle of geese, a pack of dogs, a gang of slugs. I like it.
jevicci 3 days ago
Wow where did he pick up this fucktard?
ptango666 4 days ago
Karl, just whack some salt down ur pipes...nae bother ;P
AndyNarcotic 4 days ago
i heard around 93% of human genetic material is in a sunflower or some plant lol
3rdEyeSpeaks 4 days ago
.....what 70%?
gogginfilms 4 days ago
terry the slug
gdrgdrgdgrd 4 days ago 2
I think they invented the wheel before pants
JuanThyme11 4 days ago
i have been listerning to these guys for about 10 years, and i can honestly say that they have been a major part of my life, they have made me laugh when im sad. Karl is a geninus but ricky and steve play a major part, it never ever gets boring............ thanks guys!
loomey2011 5 days ago 2
What's the dif between a slug and a snail?
pingguo2 1 week ago
@pingguo2 The snails have the shell. Though other than that they are the same.
iamguitarhero 6 days ago
"Slugish"
theduderwiggysan 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i agree with karl on this 1. slugs GET RID OF EM :) !
14kip 1 week ago
oh god I am dying from laughter.
jess401 1 week ago
Laughed so much at `...you're just saying words at me, what's a marmot!?` that I banged my head off my wall. Worth it.
mitchparr 1 week ago
Wheel before pants, GENIOUS!
littlemisstorchwood 1 week ago
@littlemisstorchwood Genius.*
MajesticDean 5 days ago
slugs are every where now...
MrThomasian 1 week ago
a gang of slugs in the tube looooool
wadood9 1 week ago
"I don't know what you're doing now, you're just saying words at me"
gamblewa01 2 weeks ago 2
I guess the 5 dislikes are from Creationists
RichyDYupYup 2 weeks ago 3
a gang of slugs. fuckin hell. hahahaha
dominickkk5 2 weeks ago
I met Heinz Wolff!!!!
JoshuaRosenberg2010 2 weeks ago
Mushified.
TheGreatSpanski 2 weeks ago 16
Where's steve?
Eddie4518 2 weeks ago
My favorite has to be this video!
sunstar7watcher 3 weeks ago
wtf is a marmot?
XxTheB0BxX 3 weeks ago
@XxTheB0BxX /watch?v=BDij7Lb7Rfc
JKarateR 2 weeks ago
wow to much for just looking good and being right
kingkevtron4 3 weeks ago
So who is this Karl guy... Honestly, someone tell me please. Either way, he's a natural comic... he's got great timing & is funny, even if he doesn't know it! XD
screenpuller 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
Rexonius 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@screenpuller
His name is Karl Pilkington. He used to be a radio producer for XFM London, in which Ricky and Stephen worked with him there for "The Ricky Gervais Show".
They coincidentally started asking him questions for some commentary during some of their shows and it took off from there, simply put.
Rexonius 3 weeks ago
@screenpuller Watch this
/watch?v=4WIr3eOyEug
GeekKnightUK 3 weeks ago
@screenpuller He is a little baldy round headed Manc twat, at least that's what Ricky refers to him as.
dragonforce525 3 weeks ago 14
Why am I not famous I am a ricky & karl combined into 1 and yet sat hear watching myself in another form!
C6RLJ 3 weeks ago
Oh, crap. The look on Karl's face is priceless. Its a mix of sheer hostility and utter stupidity. I used to think Gervais was being mean to him. Now I understand. Gervais is restraining himself with a skill worthy of a Buddhist monk.
chopin65 4 weeks ago
two of the biggest trolls ever, arguing, i love these two <3
MrWizzors 4 weeks ago
6:34 - Haha, fucking cracked me up. xD
RemixPicture 4 weeks ago
Karl makes some good points, and when Ricky secretly agrees with him but doesn't want to admit he makes a joke about the shape of his head.
awesomefrankrapid 1 month ago
Karl learns about Biology and Time travel and taking Pants off.
Moelol1994 1 month ago
Before you get in the time machine you have to take your pants of!!
LetYaRock 1 month ago
He seems to not be able to understand that evolution isnt all about the brain.
Ironbeef30 1 month ago
this karl fellow NEVER EVER laughs
FutureAbe 1 month ago
@FutureAbe He did once search it in YouTube
115UndeadAnarchy115 1 month ago
@115UndeadAnarchy115 hahahaha, once..
FutureAbe 1 month ago
They're in the matrix...
dexterdexter747 1 month ago
whats a marmot?
bawb100 1 month ago
my uncle is a slug
and p.s: I do the same with the spider webs in my house...but the spiders don't move somewhere else, they keep on rebuilding their "flats"
whitexchina 1 month ago
5 people didn't take their pants off before getting in the time machine.
Squiggy2010 1 month ago
This must be subliminal advertisement of some sort. For some reason I've eaten 3 whole oranges during this video.
Hassus 1 month ago
He really does have a head like a fucking orange.
HeyCambo 1 month ago
Only Karl Pilkington can get angry at a Slug lmao!
carpo94 1 month ago
theyre best mates
mickmon 1 month ago 3
@mickmon thanks
Flydeification 3 weeks ago
how is ricky a bully if karl pilkington is playing along. its fictional. idiots
cyrilsnare 1 month ago
@cyrilsnare No it's not. Idiot. It's called banter. The take the piss out of Karl and he takes it because they are friends. It's not fictional.
BD22UK 1 month ago
Congress Tart
MagicDanDini 1 month ago 2
HA! Same name. (quinn with 2 n's)
iamthe3rd 1 month ago
ricky gervais is a bully prick. he even doesn't know whats he talking a bout yet bullying pig shit. he tried to act cool but he is just a son of a bitch prick
anakluhur 1 month ago
@anakluhur it sounds like youre just too stupid to understand what hes talking about
Fewsandpiper 1 month ago
@anakluhur hahaha your ignorance makes me laugh, you probably beleve in god LOL
mikkiebtjonk 1 month ago
@anakluhur he isnt being a prick, hes poking karl so he'll start talking
gwtnddt9497 1 month ago
@anakluhur It's called banter or winding people up. It's very common in the UK as a friendly thing to tease each other. Ricky and Karl are actually very good friends and frequently go out to dinner together with their significant others. It's also slightly exaggerated for comic effect.
kingweirdodude 1 month ago
ricky gervais is a bully fucking prick
anakluhur 1 month ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Gentic mutation causes cancer and other problems. plus human were created by God , not from a single cell oranism.
19t86 1 month ago
@19t86 .....god isnt real
cottz4509 1 month ago 23
@cottz4509 Amen to that buddy! :)
ValenDrethOblivion 1 month ago
@cottz4509 yes he is you small minded cunt
cundyiscool 4 weeks ago
@cundyiscool Where?
thagrammarnazi 4 weeks ago
@cundyiscool If you open your mind too much, your brain will fall out.
TheBluePianist 3 weeks ago
@cottz4509 then y is christmas the biggest event of the year around the world?
MethodicalMercenary 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary 'Cause we get fucking presents that's why!
UberREDKitteh 3 weeks ago
@UberREDKitteh it was the biggest event of the year well before people exchanged gifts
MethodicalMercenary 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary lol, your saying "god is real because christmas is popular". your either trolling or 8 yrs old.
TheBluePianist 3 weeks ago
@TheBluePianist wen did i ever say that? wen? It doesn't make any sense that the entire world celebrate a "fake" holiday. I can explain why god is real in more ways than just that, but think about it. The egyptians had their gods. The mayans had their gods. the muslims have their gods. Those are secluded groups though. They might be crazy. But there are people ALL OVER THE WORLD who believe in god. It isn't a culture thing, it's a logic thing.
MethodicalMercenary 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary the fact that you point out people all over the world believe in slightly different but very similar things is actually the definition of culture. it is not the same as logic, which is rational reasoning based on accurate presuppositions/axioms.
TheBluePianist 3 weeks ago
@TheBluePianist and im not saying i believe in god beause a lot of people do. how about this- do you honestly beleive that one cell magically became us? If u do, then u hav no idea how complex we are. It is literally the same thing as saying a bacteria cell would eventually become a whale. We had to come from somewhere. And how about instead of insulting me, u actually argue ur own case. I'd love to hear that
MethodicalMercenary 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary Evolution and God aren't mutually exclusive mate, we are that complex because it took billions of years to become what we are, if we appeared from one moment to another then you sound like an orthodox catholic. Many close minded people don't take in consideration that maybe to survive and become who we are, all those evolutionary sequences have to occur?
Plus you should do some theory of knowledge classes by saying that God = Logic lol
acipswich 3 weeks ago
@acipswich I honestly dont understand what u are saying here. I just dont understand the way u explianed it. can u explain in another way, worded differently?
MethodicalMercenary 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary mmmm....you said above that you don't believe in evolution, i'm not arguing that, but many people see evolution as the opposit of God, and is not true. You deny the fact that from one cell, we "magically appear" (you def have no knowledge in scientific background so there's no issue in arguing something that I know and you don't), ok im cool with that, im just stating the fact that IF we came from a cell, that was an art of God, he planned it all the way.
acipswich 3 weeks ago
@acipswich well, considering that the BOOK OF GOD says he created man whole, yes the two theories are opposite
MethodicalMercenary 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary you must be mentally ill right? I was just trying to say that those two theories aren't mutually exclusive......he created man but not how you think he did....it's sad how people nowadays are still so narrow minded about everything....no point of arguing with you if that's ur final answer lol
acipswich 3 weeks ago
@acipswich well, u think ur brilliant. But now u say enough is enough becuase u hav nowhere else to go with this debate. There is NO reason to believe in a being such as God without a reference such a the Bible. OBVIOUSLY, I understand wat you are TRYING to say about the two not being exclusive (not sure why that wasn't clear enough already), but if the God is real so is the Bible (dont be an idiot by denying that). And it says in the Bible that MAN STARTED AS MAN.
MethodicalMercenary 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary the bible have so many mistakes, you should do some research about that :) as I just mentioned before, they were wrong in dating the universe, how would they know how we arrived to earth? they believed the earth was flat for crying out loud!! stop being so close minded and try to understand what i'm saying, stop throwing me all that bullshit, it wont work
acipswich 3 weeks ago
@acipswich the fact that the earth is flat isn't a religious fact. Also, u clearly misinterpret many of the things that im writing here. When i said that not everything can be explained through logic, i wasn't referring to God. I was just putting that out there, because u just seem like a know it all. P.S. No one can date the earth.
Also, i kno im not an expert on the matter, and you certainly are. And id say ur not doing very well debating this with that being said
MethodicalMercenary 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary I know is not a religious fact, plus true, certainly we can't define when earth originated but trust me is not 5000 years ;) Can i quote you? "But there are people ALL OVER THE WORLD who believe in god. It isn't a culture thing, it's a logic thing" what do you mean with that then?
acipswich 3 weeks ago
@acipswich i mean that in secluded societies (like cannibalistic easter island, or tribes that believe in sacrificial gifts) it makes sense that the union of people may hav some distinct and insane beliefs. However, Christianity is not an isolated case.
MethodicalMercenary 3 weeks ago
@acipswich besides that, not everything can be expalined through logic. Deal with it
MethodicalMercenary 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary everything is "explained" through logic. the clue is in the definition of explain. Use a different word if you want to imply something different
TheBluePianist 3 weeks ago
@TheBluePianist Ok then. EXPLAIN THROUGH LOGIC FOR ME how the inhabitants of several ancient developments in the middle east were able to cut rocks weighing several tons with precision that cannot be matched with any technology or machinery that we possess today. Then tell me explain isn't the right word
MethodicalMercenary 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary Civilizations in the past were more civilized than what we are today. I believe in human degradation and what we were before, we will never be the same. Materialistic people exist and will always exist, that makes me sad because i'm one more in this globalized world so what you just stated is true, no-one can explain that. You can't either, so don't play your God card here mate, is not gonna work....is funny cause every thing you don't know, you will say it was God
acipswich 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary
the word your looking for is maths. it is logical, go study it yourself.
we still use maths today. we can measure with quantifiable accuracy at atomic unit precision. I also refute your claim because the "ancient..." wouldn't even be able to record such number of significant figures, let alone be aware of the concept.
sigh. this is getting dull, keep feeding me and ill keep correcting for a little bit.
TheBluePianist 3 weeks ago
@TheBluePianist so the word "maths" can fit in place of the word "expalin."
MethodicalMercenary 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary untill you give me a historic reference then yes, duh. im wearing something on my torso at the moment, it has the function of maintaining body heat has two arms and a collar, explain to me what it is. You would not be able to tell me the fabric composition of the item, but you will make a rational conclusion that its an item of clothing.
why, are you trying to argue that greeks used to measure weight by praying? (ignoring the wrong part of your claim)
TheBluePianist 3 weeks ago
@TheBluePianist wat are u on about? where did you get that from? greeks used to measure weight by praying... stop putting words in my mouth thank you.
MethodicalMercenary 3 weeks ago
@TheBluePianist
ex·plain verb \ik-ˈsplān\
Definition of EXPLAIN
transitive verb
1a: to make known b: to make plain or understandable
2: to give the reason for or cause of
3: to show the logical development or relationships of
MethodicalMercenary 3 weeks ago
@TheBluePianist that is the definition of explain as according to websters. If websters isn't professional enough for you, then nothing is. Now, as i siad before, not eveything can be EXPLAINED, or MADE KNOWN through logic. Learn the English language before u criticize me for not knoing the advanced of scientific concepts. This conversation is over becuase u refuse to let it go anywhere
MethodicalMercenary 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary you are self defeating. read your own definition, point 3.
As for your point, that ancient greeks can determine weight. this is an illogical statement. It certainly does not imply there is no logic to the method that greeks used (since you asked me "how"). I made a logical step by stating that maths was the mechanism used (i cannot be more specific without using low probabilities. If you give me a reference, i might be able to read the mechanism to you)
TheBluePianist 3 weeks ago
@TheBluePianist what about point 3? that wasn't the definition of explain i was using. u do realize words can hav separate meanings right? And i NEVER said they can weigh rocks. Here we go again with ur poor understanding of english. I said that they "cut rocks weighing several tons with precision." We know today that those rocks weighed several tons. I NEVER said that they knew that
MethodicalMercenary 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary if i grant you a few points that i disagree with, then even so..
are you arguing that ancient precise rock cutting is unexplainable, or that there is currently no explanation. if the first, then in order for me to credit you with anything, you will need to give me a reference, otherwise, as i argued for weighing, a rational explanation is that the thing doesn't exist.
If this is regular, find something with a reference
TheBluePianist 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary which definition were you using then, imo point 3 implies 1 and 2, and is slightly more specific.
and the butterfly pattern is explained through changes in food consumption and the affect of this on hormones. i found this through a quick internet search. if your familiar with hormones, physiology and migration, the pattern is explained, or has an associated method of logical reasoning.
TheBluePianist 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary everything has the potential to have its logical reasoning made known. some things are not currently known, god is not one of those things. When people say god, they are not referring to chicken soup, they are referring to a specific human-like entity. e.g. you give him gender-like qualities, intent, and possessions. you cannot refute these because you use them too frequently, these words are appropriate for the frequency (as are all definitions of words
TheBluePianist 3 weeks ago
@TheBluePianist btw, u sound as if ur about 18 yrs old
MethodicalMercenary 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary the only way that i can see our disagreement is by my premise that you are talking about real things.
when you say thing, im assuming you mean things that are real. If something isn't real, then there doesn't need to be a logical explanation.
I don't think that you want to argue that god isn't real.
TheBluePianist 3 weeks ago
@TheBluePianist it is real that animals live largely off of instinct. I can't think of a very good specific example off the top of my head, but one example would be the migrating patterns of the monarch butterfly. It cannot be explained (who cares if explained is the right word in this instance, u kno wat i mean) HOW they know (in other words, they know from instinct, but how do they have that instinct?), but they know
MethodicalMercenary 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary i'm not going to argue any further because this is such a waste but i will try one more time.
for the rock cutting i decided to find a reference myself after all that
another quick search, blogger says there are several explanations but focuses on it being hushing which it goes on to explain is better than modern silicon.
i don't do geo sciences and history more than i have to, but im assuming you can rebuke this by time period or something
TheBluePianist 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary oh and you seem like a nice guy btw, nice channel vids
TheBluePianist 3 weeks ago
@TheBluePianist Lulz
Saturashi 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary srry bored now
TheBluePianist 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary expalined * explained
MethodicalMercenary 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary LOL, can you contradict yourself more? you started saying that believing in GOD is logic, that is probably the most retarded comment i've heard in my life
acipswich 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary lol also is funny how you state that the blue pianist has no knowledge in how complex we are. If you analyse even the smallest and less evolved cells, you can find out so many similar features and at the same time how complex they are on there own ways. You can argue the philosophical part but don't play you scientific card lol you have no clue.
acipswich 3 weeks ago
@acipswich i meant to ask you a question, and i guess i forgot to post it, but in your theory, what is the first "piece" of matter that is the origin of our existece?
MethodicalMercenary 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary The baryons, which started with the cooling and expansion of the universe. According to the bible, earth is like 5000 years old, do you agree with that? Many things can be interpreted in the bible in different ways, and I believe your way is wrong. I got a question for you, back up your point of God Created us, how did we appear?
acipswich 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
TheBluePianist 3 weeks ago
@acipswich not you lol, so many comments. im going now, this feels crowded
TheBluePianist 3 weeks ago
@MethodicalMercenary I have studied science for many years, i honestly believe that eukaryotes developed over time. and multicellular species became organised tissue. I suggest you do the same before using the word "magic" to represent studies be people who have devoted their life to attempt to understand what happens in the face of religious persecution, mainly death to non-believers.
TheBluePianist 3 weeks ago
@TheBluePianist well, wat are the chances of us becoming what we are from eukaryotes? I dont hav to study science to understand that the odds of that happening are phenomically and pretty much inexplicably miniscule. Odds that are well beyond our comprehension (similarly to how we cannot comprehend wat exactly "eternity" is, if u kno wat it mean). With that being said, i label that as "magic."
MethodicalMercenary 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MethodicalMercenary That is correct, lets say the chances of conditions of a planet being capable of what we term "life" are 1 in a billion. That is why when we look at a billion planets, only one of them has life on it. -.-
You can go much smaller than cells lol, replicating sugar and phosphates mixed together in lipids is all you need for what we consider as the definition as life.
The irony in your last comment is hilarious.
TheBluePianist 3 weeks ago 2
@19t86 -_-
CharlosMinecraft 1 month ago
@19t86 Lol once i realized you were joking i laughed pretty hard haha
SigmaSigmaGnarly 1 month ago
@19t86 Did God tech yuo how to spel wrods?
acipswich 3 weeks ago
karl is a lil bit nasty here. hes more likable/adorable later
manwithouthat44 1 month ago
what cracks me up is that watching them here or in animation is exactly the same lol, love gervais's laugh
LaurenNZ81 1 month ago
Look at that head..
skipey33 1 month ago
I believe that Karl invented the loincloth.
Fragacide 1 month ago
I COULD not be a camera man for them. It'd be impossible. "CUT! For fuck's sake, somebody get that camera guy to stop laughing! He's screwing up the material!"
Fragacide 1 month ago 2
09:13
Karl - 'I'd be the king'
Ricky - 'Maybe...'
Brilliant!!
orcanimal 1 month ago
How can someone be so daft?
Xanrry 1 month ago
MAN MOTH ?
theduderwiggysan 1 month ago
the 'who do you think you are' line killed me!! :) hahahahaha
gingerzarecool 1 month ago
I like Ricky here less than I used to. He just seems a bit more pretentious. It's the pauses and stares.
ChainsawVsGod 1 month ago
@ChainsawVsGod He does it deliberately, for comic effect - to contrast the daftness of Karl.
LavLTC 1 month ago
GET OUT!!
kenc12 1 month ago 4
lol Terry the slug xD
Ferrinas1 1 month ago
Transcribe Audio :')
AeroForce1Pilot 1 month ago
00:36 hahahah look at that goddamn head
Azuresong 1 month ago
How did Karl meet a scientist?
Mxlsptlk 1 month ago
The 2 dislikes were from Karl and his head...
SadPuppyProductions 1 month ago 6
@SadPuppyProductions you forgot to talk about how round it is
kenc12 1 month ago
Karl you ever wonder if the slugs are trying to take a shower, and you're getting in the way of them?
ToxicTwig 2 months ago 3
you're just saying words at me!! what's a marmot?? ROTFL
matrixch88 2 months ago 3
Terry the Slug.
cpfc4life1505 2 months ago
Mushified
ArcticSA 2 months ago
hahaha funny stuff
spiroxable 2 months ago
if i was stuck on a desert island, even with all the fine bitches out there, I think id have to go for Karl, for the laughs
chelseafan15 2 months ago
WHAT ARE YOU DOING??!!
mykolwalters 2 months ago
Mushified
ThatOllieGuy 2 months ago
i could watch this 24/7.
bestialvomit666 2 months ago
Gotta love this!
Literion1 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I WANT TO KNOW ABOUT MARMOT!
RawSwedishMeatball 2 months ago
I actually thought karl was a scriptet character when I first watched this.
Hjerrick 2 months ago 2
What's a marmot?
danmancmufc 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
Watching Ricky and Karl is a bit like a football match. You need the build-up and the prematch excitement to get everything they speak about. You know watching a match from half-time onwards is good because it's your team, but you don't get the whole picture. It's clever and funny on so many levels as everything they speak of is related. The links are brilliant and if you have watched the 'Ricky V Karl' match from the start, there's a big difference. Work that garble of shite out you kunts.
AdriansPunk 2 months ago
@AdriansPunk You mean soccer or real football?
TheMicCheck 2 months ago
"what r they doing iner, GET OUT!" hahaha
J0ban 2 months ago
I love this so much. Maybe I'm loosing my marbles a bit, but to me this is like a modern version of this ancient greek bloke, who wrote all this long conversations.
DasNutellamaedchen 2 months ago
There's a gang of em in the tube!
VetleRB 2 months ago
Mushiefied.
misfitstattoo 2 months ago
A gang of them in a tube LOLLL
iduel2010 2 months ago 61
This has been flagged as spam show
Ok we share 70% of our genetic material with a slug. So that means that 70% is really insignificant when you observe all the differences between a human and a slug. It's the 30% that matters. It's the marshmallows in the Lucky Charms, the soy sauce in a bowl of rice, that gives the "flavor" to the "meal". A painting is mostly canvas. It's the oil that completes the masterpiece.
skittlesizzler 2 months ago
Comment removed
skittlesizzler 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mabey abit more than 30 million years.
l337M3X1C4N 2 months ago
your uncle terry the slug LOL :'D
xkolxftw 2 months ago 2
I could watch this for hours
basver01 3 months ago 80