Budwiser got like half of the joke....if they did the whole thing then WKUK would have a bigger case against them. Still pretty shitty of them to do that.
@Vegetarian06 They said that they even tried to sue them for it..... and the talked about it on the sauce, + bud made that commercial after wkuk sent them that video.....
FUCK BUDWEISER. this is so fucked, i cant believe they would steal a joke and have the government back them up. i have officially stopped drinking budweiser. no more, ban the bud...well the drink lol :P
I wonder how many people are posting "they copied them!!!" because they think its wrong. Now i wonder how many of them have cheated on a test before. idk just thought of that.
wow what fags! they cant hire some comedian to give them a super bowel idea, so they go off and steal WKUK? Thats fucking sad for a huge corperation like that! Not cool!
@stinkinapekilla: Glad that we got that cleared up. Let it be known that the mighty apekilla was the first in many of the Bud-Couch wars which will start the infamous Wei v. Wade court battle! Damn you. Why did this have to happen?! WHHHHHHHHHHY!!!?????!!!
This shows how a business can take a idea then make it as dumb as possible. Removing the whole 'ending a sentence with question = a slap' takes away the slight subtle humor and replaces it with a montage of meh.
While in the bowiser's one they just slap each other instead of the fistbang, The whites kids version is that "You only slap someone when they say a sentence ending with a one syllable word" and "a kick in the balls for using incomplete sentences".
If bod tried to copy this idea, they just fucking fail miserably.
Not similar enough in my opinion, but still too closely inspired to be creative. Just goes to show how clueless people are in the advertising industry.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Wow, the Budweiser commercial and the WKUK skit are very different, as someone said below me in WKUK the thing was to slap only after questions ending and one syllable and blah blah blah. The Bud one was just slapping people. Not plagiarism at all.
Dude when they receive a tape that includes this skit and then magically come up with a commercial a little while later that has slapping as the "new thing" as its premise, it may be different enough to be legal but its definitely plagiarism.
The difference is that in WKUK, the thing is to slap someone whenever they ask a question. In Budweiser, the new thing is apparently just to slap people. So the WKUK were certainly more clever, but it's not the same thing.
There's no drama between the WKUK and Budweiser suing them or the other way around. Where ever that drama got started is LOL. I've really gotta get off the weed.
I don't think its close enough to be considered plaigerism... if you watch the rest of the new thing video you see budweiser video is not even close to it
alright food for thought: if there was no way WKUK would win VS budweiser, then why didnt budweiser sue them instead??? im sure they have proof somewhere of when they made the video. but budweiser has a lot of money they can put into hiring lawyers...
yall are all fuckin stupid. who fuckin cares if they sued or even if they could sue. it doesnt concern any of you arguing about it in the slightest. so why dont you go find something to discuss that matters.
i love how everyone hates corperate people, but they are the ones who help our economy the most, without them, america would be nothing, i dont think you all get that?
Actually, if you believe that you are either ignorant or of the minority of people that benefit from the corps making that much money, which only makes you selfish. The truth is that the workers that make the products and the people that buy them are the ones supporting the economy, that's always been the case. The bigger corps get the more one sided the economy gets, which makes it easy for it to crash when something goes wrong, much like it has recently.
but you cant have an economy run by mom and pop stores either, and for example think about what would happens without walmart? we would loose millions of jobs, and plus walmart saves us money to buy things at the smaller non-chain stores, by charging less for things, and the same with just about every other corporation out there
By using outsourcing and taking away jobs, having a base product and then immediately coming out with already necessary add-ons, and who knows how much money is lost in transition and goes to Executive pockets...
every godd or service preovider does that, thats how any buisiness works, that how to make a profit, its just that coporations sell a wider variety of things, thus doing this more and making more money, and what would you rather have outsourcing and taking away jobs, or no corporations, and taking away even more jobs?
they took the idea of slaping, thats all, in the wkuk sketch they got slaped when they asked a question, in the bud commercial they just slaped each other for no reason, you fucking dumbass
i relaize this, but that one itty bitty difference is why they didnt have a case, and wouldnt have won in court you fucking retard, your the faggot with out a fucking brain stem, not that, that even makes sence
Ever heard of the saying imitation is the highest form of flattery?
Whoever said they sued?
I didn't see that anywhere! It wasn't the final sketch moron! This was something that wasn't published on tv at all. This is a "beta sketch". So maybe they did sue and since it wasn't publicly aired they didn't have a case since it's not timestamped and could be argued that they made this after. LOOK OUTSIDE THE BOX!
Or maybe they didn't sue.
Waiting for your rebuttal. It should be another bullshit line
are you fucking dumb? you are the one with the bullshit lines, if i wasnt "looking outside the box" i would've agreed with everyone else on here saying budweiser stole their entire sketch, but no i looked outside the box and found the differences, that made them unable to sue for steeling the idea, and yes they were going to sue, but budweiser's lawyers showed wkuk why they wouldnt be able to sue, that good enough for you, or are you going to keep making points that i prove bullshit?
Here's the deal, the whitest kids started in 2007, before that they were a sketch group and this video is not valid since there is no documentation proving that they sent it to budweiser, just no proof.
2005 is lesser than 2007. There is a HUGE if not undeniable fact that this video got circulated around the internet and budweiser stole it.
Like I said before. Since there is no watermarking on the timestamp that means that they couldn't sue and win.
i've been giving you facts the entire fucking time, your the one who seems 12, if you cant understand what the fuck im saying, and wiht "Ass-umptions" do you think that makes you look like a smart person, and now you've turned this whole thimg around saying how wkuk couldn't have sued, which is what i said to start this whole fucking argument. and what with responding 3 times? you had to keep thinking to get a complete thought?, oh and that video isn't of me retard, i just think it's funny
budshithiester stole the idea and wasted way too much money on it support the right Bud the green Bud not the piss tasting bud ......assholes corperate assholes
Well they both include Slapping each other as being popular. The only difference is that in WKUK it's called "The New Thing" and in Bud's commercial it's called "In." Besides that it's exactly the same.
Fuck Anheuser-Busch InBev and their blatant plagiarism.
neillob11 2 months ago
haha did the last slap on the chick almost sound like a gunshot to anyone else?
severedin2 5 months ago
Thumbs up if I can shit on your moms chest
lilmurphy01 6 months ago
I love it as a sketch but as a commercial is total shit!!! I'm never drinking budweiser again... WKUK rules!!!
MegaLink34 6 months ago
The Stooges have been slapping each other for decades on TV......I don't see the relevance.
dangerready 6 months ago
@dangerready The 3 Stooges weren't calling it 'the new thing'.
TheFungusdrone 5 months ago
@dangerready but the way i had sex with your mother was a god damn shame
GAGLY04 3 months ago
What do you get when the government puts themselves with a shitty beer company?
Something that Americans can get more pissed about!
This isn't a joke....Its just the fucking truth
Fuby803 6 months ago
Bud Light taste like shit juice.
TotalDousche 6 months ago
Q: What do Budweiser and having sex in a canoe have in common?
A: Both are fucking close to water.
MisterNES 7 months ago
I'm surprised that there hasn't been lawsuit. It's serve Budweiser right for hypnotizing millions of Americans to drink their piss beer.
MisterNES 7 months ago
the wkuk redid the sketch even better....with timmy being slapped, kicked, and punched the hell out of
rrmayhem 8 months ago 3
that sucks I hate budweiser
Hitlerwearsasnuggie 8 months ago
@Hitlerwearsasnuggie I love Budweiser but this is messed up!
Toadphillips 7 months ago
@Toadphillips lol im not even old enough to drink beer
Hitlerwearsasnuggie 7 months ago
The light up jack skellington hat the chicks wearing is juss like mine
shadowschyther 9 months ago
Fuck the Big Three. I like my Lionshead.
GamberroSalvador 10 months ago
"nice job in there, larson. you saved the account."
larson. larson. larson. larson. larson. larcen. larceny.
TP2010 10 months ago
Budwiser got like half of the joke....if they did the whole thing then WKUK would have a bigger case against them. Still pretty shitty of them to do that.
TheCrazedMadman 10 months ago
budweiser burns crops
coffeetablesex 11 months ago
Meh. Bud Light tastes like stale watered down piss anyway.
AlCapwn0 1 year ago 5
@AlCapwn0
yeah i'm a supporter of marijuana-2-go products instead.
shumbadumb 11 months ago
Refreshing bud light
soufang 1 year ago
There's another version of this but it's the cast of WKUK. Timmy's in it! This must be from Trevor's college days?
animecrazy102 1 year ago
@animecrazy102 no WKUK does some sketches like 5 times...like the "You can see me?" one. So no...probably not
xEmoKid13 1 year ago
Watch the documentary Beer Wars, it will make you hate Anheiser-Busch products even more.
mYmuSicpLaYLiSt09 1 year ago
@mYmuSicpLaYLiSt09 It's not even that great of a documentary, it definitely loses steam, but it has a good point at least.
GamberroSalvador 10 months ago
Buying bud in the first place is a sin.
randogg18707 1 year ago
wtf damnnn fucking buttwieser ...
warriorofsteel01 1 year ago
does anyone know who the girl is in the wkuk version at the end?
Swimmer218 1 year ago
Yeah after finding this out, never buying another budweiser product again.
HessenDragoon 1 year ago 2
Febuary*...lol
yayjay20 1 year ago
It´s clear and really budweiser took it. WKUK are brilliant.
nofuture20091 1 year ago
i like the newer version of the WKUK's new thing haha
RandomBlueArmadillo 1 year ago 2
Wow, that's ridiculous. I hate Budweiser now
TheSamTracy 1 year ago
Budweiser will NEVER top WKUK, ever. They wouldn't know funny if it slapped them in the face.
mistressdemonica 1 year ago 10
Arguing on the internet is like running in the special olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded
gohawks123456 1 year ago 5
@gohawks123456
That joke is older than existence
noogies 1 year ago
@gohawks123456 That saying isn't very far off either
cobainhumbucker 1 year ago
It's illegal to say the words, "I want to kill the president of budweiser". It's completely illegal, but I was just TELLING you guys, so it's ok.
Dogmonkeyizaac 1 year ago 14
@Dogmonkeyizaac I love you.
P0litiCallyIncorrect 1 year ago
Budweiser Bastards!!!!!!!!
KlistSeker 1 year ago
they didnt get it. stupid...wkuk rules :)
godessofselfdissery 1 year ago
well you cant really prove they took that from the wkuk..
Vegetarian06 1 year ago
@Vegetarian06 They said that they even tried to sue them for it..... and the talked about it on the sauce, + bud made that commercial after wkuk sent them that video.....
ak121deadlock 1 year ago
I heard about this on the news acouple days after that. WKUKs is 100000x better anyways
TheChronicPwn 1 year ago
they should sue
kuubirasengan 1 year ago
timmy does the part waaaay better
kiwikraze565 1 year ago 2
you're mistaken. slapping people isn't something you can copyright.
jjfriedberg 1 year ago
@jjfriedberg its the fact they said it was the new thing and started slapping eachother
HailstormCourier 1 year ago
@HailstormCourier it's not that, it's the fact they ripped off the sketch is wy they tried to sue
primal2020 1 year ago
FUCK BUDWEISER. this is so fucked, i cant believe they would steal a joke and have the government back them up. i have officially stopped drinking budweiser. no more, ban the bud...well the drink lol :P
MichelisArchangeli 1 year ago 2
its kk the commercial was mentally challenged anyway
tattoolover100 1 year ago
KILLADELPHIA!!
amc0100 1 year ago
sue them you idiot not sew
giveitup75 1 year ago
@giveitup75 The proper nomenclature is "Reply."
AnarchalPatriarch 1 year ago
I stopped drinking Budweiser after one beer not because of the WKUK (although i love em), its because the beer is pisswater
SNOW890 1 year ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
i just thought of this.
I wonder how many people are posting "they copied them!!!" because they think its wrong. Now i wonder how many of them have cheated on a test before. idk just thought of that.
ceazuh 2 years ago
wow what fags! they cant hire some comedian to give them a super bowel idea, so they go off and steal WKUK? Thats fucking sad for a huge corperation like that! Not cool!
Darcxone1 2 years ago
wkuk tried to sue them but budwieser is tied with the government so the wkuk backed off...fukin bull shit...
gffrycole 2 years ago 73
thats not cool to do. never steal others ideas or u will get a shit load of haters
hottaco11 2 years ago
budweiser sucks dick they always copy people i hate copy cats my friends stop'd drinking budweiser cuz they copied WKUK
BigSkylar 2 years ago 4
SEW THEM!!
stinkinapekilla 2 years ago
@stinkinapekilla
"sue"
I don't know what "sewing" will do. lol
nycolea13 2 years ago 5
Sewing them would probably kill them
stinkinapekilla 1 year ago
sue them not sew them
BAQPenuin 1 year ago
are you dumb?
G4MEnM0VI3T3ASERS 1 year ago
@stinkinapekilla: "Sew them" to what? A couch?
Juggalofromthehills 1 year ago
yes sew them to a couch so they cant steal anymore! obviously that is what i meant
stinkinapekilla 1 year ago
@stinkinapekilla: Glad that we got that cleared up. Let it be known that the mighty apekilla was the first in many of the Bud-Couch wars which will start the infamous Wei v. Wade court battle! Damn you. Why did this have to happen?! WHHHHHHHHHHY!!!?????!!!
Juggalofromthehills 1 year ago
well BUTTER MY BISCUTS Whos fault is that!
stinkinapekilla 1 year ago
@stinkinapekilla Yeah... right...
TheWigglyTurtle 1 year ago
are thay real hits?
mjtgg18 2 years ago
@mjtgg18 you don't know much about television or movies do you?
freestylerocker666 2 years ago
obviouslt copied from the whitest kids.....
jennyboerding 2 years ago
THEY STOLE IT!!! SUE THOSE LOSERSSSSS
DNap100 2 years ago
Well I know what beer I'm not drinking.
Rawrzies 2 years ago 5
Those bastards...
GrimSkey 2 years ago
This shows how a business can take a idea then make it as dumb as possible. Removing the whole 'ending a sentence with question = a slap' takes away the slight subtle humor and replaces it with a montage of meh.
Suck my balls.
marcbaldy 2 years ago 8
You guys have no idea.
My mom works to this day in the advertising business and runs her own company.
Her shit get stolen all the time. Not million dollar Superbowl spots, but just regular ads.
She pitches an idea to the client, they take it and use it with another agency who's in bed with the client.
Some bullshit.
That's why you don't go into advertising.
RJhasFLOW 2 years ago 8
wow what douches.... even word for word
D:<
awesomebeast3 2 years ago
these stupid fuckers stole The whitest kids u know ideas!
MrRedwoodvalley 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
My grandma works at DDB-Chicago and works with the owner James (and i always go to the christmas party)
anthonyws49 2 years ago
holy shit you are soo cool ! i wish i was as cool as you!
killervid 2 years ago 5
well go burn in hell you soulless piece of shit.
mattlightbound 2 years ago
While in the bowiser's one they just slap each other instead of the fistbang, The whites kids version is that "You only slap someone when they say a sentence ending with a one syllable word" and "a kick in the balls for using incomplete sentences".
If bod tried to copy this idea, they just fucking fail miserably.
ignas1130 2 years ago 2
SKEET SKEET!
BreakThrewBrothers 2 years ago
both funny commercial and funny skit
iDrum37 2 years ago
budweiser completely missed the joke, theirs didn't even make sense.
clwatts88 2 years ago 97
rofl i know right
jackassunit22 2 years ago
xD yeah
blaise998 2 years ago
@clwatts88 haha, they really didnt get it
djlpenguin 1 year ago
Not similar enough in my opinion, but still too closely inspired to be creative. Just goes to show how clueless people are in the advertising industry.
VideoRenz 2 years ago 4
It is similar enough when you GET A TAPE OF IT before you make a commercial out of it.
fritzthecat4455 2 years ago 5
Yeah I agree, budweiser is messed up.
VideoRenz 2 years ago
i really didnt think that was copyrighting
trevormcdonald2 2 years ago
That guy screams way too loud.
Viper5677 2 years ago 3
i kno right. he was just getting slapped.
llamassayobey212 2 years ago
the whitest kids u know them tried to sue them, but the goverment wouldn't let them. That kind of pisses me off there
TheExtant 2 years ago 7
"hey guys" SLAP!!! LOL
oOWinterNightOo 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wow, the Budweiser commercial and the WKUK skit are very different, as someone said below me in WKUK the thing was to slap only after questions ending and one syllable and blah blah blah. The Bud one was just slapping people. Not plagiarism at all.
bootsaregood 2 years ago
Dude when they receive a tape that includes this skit and then magically come up with a commercial a little while later that has slapping as the "new thing" as its premise, it may be different enough to be legal but its definitely plagiarism.
asmodeon 2 years ago 6
The difference is that in WKUK, the thing is to slap someone whenever they ask a question. In Budweiser, the new thing is apparently just to slap people. So the WKUK were certainly more clever, but it's not the same thing.
s3ac0w 2 years ago
ending in one syllable words....
yummycars 2 years ago
I would sue their asses for this.
jbuck594 2 years ago
You can't copyright slapping.
misterhed 2 years ago 6
lol
jbuck594 2 years ago
wow
NealTheRealDeal 2 years ago
fuckin pigs
applesaucegotit 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yall have no life, commenting on Youtube videos and stuff
XD
EA11RDrift 2 years ago
so you dont have a life either? way to make an ass of yourself.
JgGooden 2 years ago
i spot a hipocrite
henson360 2 years ago
You do not spot sarcasm.
EA11RDrift 2 years ago
what?
henson360 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I do not see any simiarity between the two vidoes I think they are both unique and independant concepts................DRINK BUD
paulandrew36 2 years ago
are you joking?? if you are lol if not... wow
InsertingSuppository 2 years ago
There's no drama between the WKUK and Budweiser suing them or the other way around. Where ever that drama got started is LOL. I've really gotta get off the weed.
FlowingGeisha 2 years ago
I don't think its close enough to be considered plaigerism... if you watch the rest of the new thing video you see budweiser video is not even close to it
DJgodrocks 2 years ago
alright food for thought: if there was no way WKUK would win VS budweiser, then why didnt budweiser sue them instead??? im sure they have proof somewhere of when they made the video. but budweiser has a lot of money they can put into hiring lawyers...
touches2much 2 years ago
yall are all fuckin stupid. who fuckin cares if they sued or even if they could sue. it doesnt concern any of you arguing about it in the slightest. so why dont you go find something to discuss that matters.
repstpete 2 years ago
Paradox: you just argued about something that doesn't matter, too, so you have no right to judge anyone else here.
Stupid to try and convince people to do something else when you're doing the exact same thing, retard.
Pinkaugust 2 years ago
WTF are you getting at thats pretty lame dude
anarchyslugs 2 years ago
why did old ppl have to steal the fist bump.... watch its gunna become just like the high5. only old people do it.
mochopz 2 years ago
actually old people didn't steal the fist bumb, gays did it.
high five is still in use by all ages and colors, it's just cooler than anything else...
Pinkaugust 2 years ago
high fives are no longer cool, and NO normal teenager/young adult uses it...
and yes when my dad and his co workers start doing fist bumps, they are no longer cool, and have been stolen by old people.
mochopz 2 years ago
Like I said, high fives still cool, fist bumbs are used exclusively by gays.
Pinkaugust 2 years ago
And Obamams
promdawg 2 years ago
WKUK GOT SCREWED A.K.A PWNDD
drowningbodacius 2 years ago
i love how everyone hates corperate people, but they are the ones who help our economy the most, without them, america would be nothing, i dont think you all get that?
ioec234 2 years ago
No, I understand completely. I don't hate corporations so keep your perception to yourself.
I hate when corporations steal ideas when they hire people for millions of dollars to come up with them.
kgonepostl 2 years ago
i was talking about all of the people on here who said they hate them, there was no reason to be offended you reject
ioec234 2 years ago
Actually, if you believe that you are either ignorant or of the minority of people that benefit from the corps making that much money, which only makes you selfish. The truth is that the workers that make the products and the people that buy them are the ones supporting the economy, that's always been the case. The bigger corps get the more one sided the economy gets, which makes it easy for it to crash when something goes wrong, much like it has recently.
ErikVaughnDillinger 2 years ago
but you cant have an economy run by mom and pop stores either, and for example think about what would happens without walmart? we would loose millions of jobs, and plus walmart saves us money to buy things at the smaller non-chain stores, by charging less for things, and the same with just about every other corporation out there
ioec234 2 years ago
maybe if corporations actually provided quality good and services instead of finding new ways to screw people out money.
orpheus119 2 years ago
explain to me how they screw people out of money?
ioec234 2 years ago
By using outsourcing and taking away jobs, having a base product and then immediately coming out with already necessary add-ons, and who knows how much money is lost in transition and goes to Executive pockets...
orpheus119 2 years ago
every godd or service preovider does that, thats how any buisiness works, that how to make a profit, its just that coporations sell a wider variety of things, thus doing this more and making more money, and what would you rather have outsourcing and taking away jobs, or no corporations, and taking away even more jobs?
ioec234 2 years ago
what the hell??? this is fucking annoying why the hell does it keep pausing and showing stupid ass text
lavacape 2 years ago
It's in the description. =/
0ccamsRazor 2 years ago
yeah i know and its still annoying as hell
it could do that without pausing at least lol
lavacape 2 years ago
Imagine how many people are slapping eachother in the world right now because of the new thing.
PizzaCatGuido 2 years ago
they're both similar not the same
ioec234 2 years ago
How is it not the same?
kgonepostl 2 years ago
if you cant see that they're not exactly the same then your a retard, and why do you think wkuk didnt sue them?
ioec234 2 years ago
Sorry they aren't wearing the same attire, attending a professional basketball game, and trying to impress the boss.
But otherwise, exactly the same you waste of space no nothing know it all
kgonepostl 2 years ago
they took the idea of slaping, thats all, in the wkuk sketch they got slaped when they asked a question, in the bud commercial they just slaped each other for no reason, you fucking dumbass
ioec234 2 years ago
It's the whole idea of the commercial dumbass, not one ITTY BITTY difference you fuckin cunt.
What's the new thing? Slapping the shit outa each other. Do you even possess a brain stem?
kgonepostl 2 years ago
i relaize this, but that one itty bitty difference is why they didnt have a case, and wouldnt have won in court you fucking retard, your the faggot with out a fucking brain stem, not that, that even makes sence
ioec234 2 years ago
Ever heard of the saying imitation is the highest form of flattery?
Whoever said they sued?
I didn't see that anywhere! It wasn't the final sketch moron! This was something that wasn't published on tv at all. This is a "beta sketch". So maybe they did sue and since it wasn't publicly aired they didn't have a case since it's not timestamped and could be argued that they made this after. LOOK OUTSIDE THE BOX!
Or maybe they didn't sue.
Waiting for your rebuttal. It should be another bullshit line
kgonepostl 2 years ago
are you fucking dumb? you are the one with the bullshit lines, if i wasnt "looking outside the box" i would've agreed with everyone else on here saying budweiser stole their entire sketch, but no i looked outside the box and found the differences, that made them unable to sue for steeling the idea, and yes they were going to sue, but budweiser's lawyers showed wkuk why they wouldnt be able to sue, that good enough for you, or are you going to keep making points that i prove bullshit?
ioec234 2 years ago
God............is this even worth it. I mean he does freestyle like some dumbass moron in his youtube videos....
kgonepostl 2 years ago
Ok...........
Here's the deal, the whitest kids started in 2007, before that they were a sketch group and this video is not valid since there is no documentation proving that they sent it to budweiser, just no proof.
2005 is lesser than 2007. There is a HUGE if not undeniable fact that this video got circulated around the internet and budweiser stole it.
Like I said before. Since there is no watermarking on the timestamp that means that they couldn't sue and win.
kgonepostl 2 years ago
There's no proof that the whitest kids version came out after Budweiser.
Yes, it aired 2008 but their clip was first.
See, here's the thing, I state these little things you never seem to have. Facts. You state Ass-umptions.
What are you fuckin 12?
kgonepostl 2 years ago
i've been giving you facts the entire fucking time, your the one who seems 12, if you cant understand what the fuck im saying, and wiht "Ass-umptions" do you think that makes you look like a smart person, and now you've turned this whole thimg around saying how wkuk couldn't have sued, which is what i said to start this whole fucking argument. and what with responding 3 times? you had to keep thinking to get a complete thought?, oh and that video isn't of me retard, i just think it's funny
ioec234 2 years ago
How does it feel to have your own little world in which you live?
kgonepostl 2 years ago
what the fuck are you talking about now?
Chr0nicB00m 2 years ago
Actually in the WKUK sketch the rule was only to slap each other when the other person asked a question ending with a one syllable word.
Kjellarnek 2 years ago
budshithiester stole the idea and wasted way too much money on it support the right Bud the green Bud not the piss tasting bud ......assholes corperate assholes
smellyjonnie 2 years ago
well the WKUK version is much more complicated..the bud one is just plain slapping
MeatloafFudgepcker 2 years ago 4
Well they both include Slapping each other as being popular. The only difference is that in WKUK it's called "The New Thing" and in Bud's commercial it's called "In." Besides that it's exactly the same.
spikesonthebrain 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is ablsolute trash
6bamf666666 2 years ago
i dont get how everyone is saying it's not the same thing...are you guys blind? ....idiots
iamraz 2 years ago 9
Comment removed
zimNvgcatsfan 2 years ago
you mean the "new" thing right?
werty302 2 years ago
yeah both sketches include slapping, so what? different enough.
russianspy1234 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wkuk talked about it in their interview with fuse.
boozehoundbarbie 2 years ago
Comment removed
boozehoundbarbie 2 years ago
If you'd actually watch the whole wkuk video, you'd see the two are actually pretty different
spysoflondon 2 years ago 3
hey, hitler!
DeplorindaProjects 2 years ago
actually it is HEIL Hitler
DocWeasel76 2 years ago 2
hahahahahh hey hitler xD
ibliveinangels 2 years ago
fuck budlight for coping
dirtysouthboss420 2 years ago 4
loved the ending of WKUK skit. "Hey guyz" *WAM*
ocp188 2 years ago 3
not really very connected.
there was actually some thought that went into the WKUK sketch. The bud commercial is just pointless slapstick
pootytang42 2 years ago
What Crap! Makes me mad that they stole that from WKUK! :(
PullingUpDaisies 2 years ago 5
ha ha ha funny!!! Its hilarios... I didnt see the video
andyman196107 2 years ago
lol
AtreyuNumber1Fan 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the real question is who has the time to make this gay video about plagiarism?
YodaMan19 2 years ago
Yeah...people who have time to do stuff are gay!
SeanTPoindexter 2 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
yes, like you
YodaMan19 2 years ago