Added: 4 years ago
From: Jefflered
Views: 24,331
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (243)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • NO GOAL

    

  • !<3 Vesa Toskala <3!

  • ITS A GOAL, WHAT DID I SAY YOU CAN NEVER TRUST THOSE DAMN ZEBRAS

  • 240p.

  • no goal

  • Goal

  • HighStick There No Goal! >:(

  • no goal to high

  • No goal

  • NO GOAL

  • Leafs suck

  • f**king craolina bitches toronto could of got that goal

  • this was a horrible game with video review.

  • High stick, refs r retarded

  • lol its soaring above the bar and it goes out of side and then its a goal. does this take a physics major to figure out?

  • good goal,very close though.looks like the blade of his stick is pointing up, above the crossbar, but as the puck makes contact with it, it is turning down, making it just at crossbar height...if they called no goal, that would have been a worse call than allowing it.

  • @MrDaemonB Thank you for being the one person acting over 13 in this comment section :)

  • its narrow but high stick, no goal.

  • no goal

  • no goal!!!!

    

  • no goal

  • NO GOAL

  • It counts because the call on the ice was a goal, and although it seems in one of the replays that the stick was high, the evidence needs to be 100% in disproving the call on the ice. There was no solid view of the play that showed the stick contact so the call on the ice stands.

  • @Showmeyourtitties your wrong lol

  • nooo goal!!!!!!!!!!

  • the stick was slanted upward his stick blade was above the crossbar, but where the puck mad contact with the stick was lower then the blade....it hit on his shaft and that looked to be even with the crossbar, therefore its a GOAL!

  • Granted we got screwed by Carolina refs and Vancover refs this year (i'm not a leafs fan) I wanna point out that the quality that toronto saw may have been better from this view there is no conclusive evidence to say high sticking. And if the original call was goal then it must stand. and it's way to blurry on here to tell if it was a goal or a high stick

  • High Stick = No Goal

  • @Sw33tVictory YEP U R RIGHT

  • no goal

  • Puck was hit with a high stick ...... no goal

  • 2:23 the best view. no goal. damn nhl refs always favor the home team

  • no goal

  • no goal

  • no goal

  • 1:05 looks like it say:FUCKER

  • @teenagehbk

    lol YEAH

  • @teenagehbk lol you are deaf

  • GO LEAFS GO !!!!

  • goal

  • His stick seem high, but we can't tell where did the puck hit his stick. It's too easy to call it high sticking simply by using the highest point of the stick.

    Was it really a goal? Dunno. But the replay is non-conclusive.

  • ok umm....i think these reffs hate the leafs

  • good call

  • goal

  • not conclusive dudes

  • No goal

  • Oh wow.  The NHL's even dumber than I thought.

  • No goal!

  • Wow high stick duh

  • This is the second HORRIBLE call in this game.

    For the record, I am neither a Toronto nor Carolina fan.

  • I AM a Carolina fan, and I have to agree with you.

  • @suburbanindie o i know man thats such a bad goal like the goal with blake im not sure like thats a hard call and this calll was just horrible!! go caps! lol i just had to put that in there sorry

  • that is not a goal

  • goal.

  • NO GOAL!

  • Comment removed

  • No goal for sure. I am an NHL goal looker

  • Wow. Really?

    Yet you do don't know that your job is actually called a NHL Goal reviewer?

    I wish I knew as much is you.

  • I dont work for the NHL stupid. I just look at vids with goal or no goal titles and i say my answer

  • This was no goal. But it doesnt freaking matter. We go so screwed over in this game

  • no goal

  • goal

  • no goal

  • NO GOAL

  • damn toronto got screwed that day didnt they? haha

  • NO GOAL

  • I Think no goal, what joe bowen said, Toskala was gonna catch the puck and his glove was above the crossbar so i think no goal

  • no goal but who cares

  • No goal. High stick.

  • NO GOAL way to high but nice tip!

  • goal judging by the offal futage

  • Very unfair match, atleast the leafs goal should of counted then

  • I think you might be a tiny bit biased there...

  • The officials did not have enough conclusive evidence to change their call. The call on the ice will stand if there is not conclusive evidence to prove otherwise.

  • NO WAY

  • NO GOAL!

  • i think some people are confused in one of the shots...what actually looks like the crossbar is actually the end boards...so be careful in deciphering the two before you say "it's obviously no goal"

  • watch Blakes no goal on this same game, carolina refs are the most gayest refs ever

  • well u no that the review goes to toronto so really u should blame them not the ref.

    Go Leafs!

  • you could never see the puck over the line on that goal...even though it obviously was...the correct call was made in that instance.

  • what the fuck you talking about ?

  • watch the video, maybe you'll see what i'm talking about.

  • fuck waaaay high stick !

  • This was a crazy game. I remember watching this game because I am a Canes fan.

    I think that this one could go either way. I don't think that the replays are that good.

  • Yes i agree with don coharsky it should count the hole stick has to be over it was not over the cross bar only the blade of the stick he did not hit it with the blade.

  • dumbass!

  • GOALL

  • not another dumbass god whats happening to the world

  • WOW thats really high haha way over the crossbar

  • Good thing the NHL doesnt use video quality like this to make its decisions. Don't blame the refs, blame the NHL for not putting 2 cameras in place (one on each end of the goal line) to review this exact thing.

  • NO GOAL

  • The refs should be made to understand simple Physics before they are allowed to officiate. ..or maybe just a common sense class. They blow too many of these calls.

  • copy and paste

    2. send this to 2 other videos.

    3. hold your breath for 10 seconds

    4. press refresh twice

    5. LOOK AT YOUR BACKGROUND IT WILL BE FREAKY

  • high stick much...the commentators have better calls than the goal judge

  • wierd game

  • In this same game Blake was robbed of a great goal because Ward kicked it out.

  • no goal

  • i think it´s no goal

  • copy and paste

    2. send this to 2 other videos.

    3. hold your breath for 10 seconds

    4. press refresh twice

    5. LOOK AT YOUR BACKGROUND IT WILL BE FREAKY

  • GO BLACKHAWKS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • im no maple leaf fan but that was defenetly no goal... the stick was obviously on top of the cross bar you can clearly see it on one of the last replays

  • goal, for sure

  • no goal

  • hy stick damn it fuck

  • u stupid fucken ref we could of won the stanley CUP (just kidding ) CAUSE have not won the cup sence 69 !

  • Judging by your grammar, you haven't been in school since 69 either!

  • who fixes their grammar for a comment on youtube?, relax..

  • ya this game was fucking blown by shitty refs, shitty people in the review booth, and joe bowen.

  • While I agree that this is the wrong call, the blame can't be placed on the referees on ice here. The review process takes place in the "war room" in Toronto and it seems basic math escapes them. I've seen so many goals that were clearly hit with a high stick allowed I wonder why they even both reviewing them. Kicking motion also escapes me. I've seen Lupul kick a goal in and have it count, and earlier this week Crosby clearly kicked a puck in. All NHL officiating is inconsistent and sucks.

  • walker doesn't deserve it. Nice high stick you fuck.

  • are you retard it was in ?

  • it was in but its a high stick u cant tip a puck if your stick is over the cross bar

  • the ref's pissed me pff sp much that game, Blakes disallowed was obvioussly in, and this was a high stick, i dunnno, looks pretty favored and one sided to me

  • Euhhh High STICK!!! DUHHH

  • NO GOAL

  • those reffs are ball sacks that no goal fer shure

  • no goal the goal judging sucks shit this game two bad calls

  • shouldnt have been a goal and is this the same game where Blakes goal didnt count???????

  • yes it is

  • They say that the last revision took 20 minutes to be made... so I think they simply wanted to make a quick decision and go with the original decision. Haste makes waste...

  • i am awesome at goal judging the call is:NO GOAL  REFS SUCK

  • it was a goal

  • I am a Pro at goals and no goals. this is NO GOAL

  • wow, what a terrible call. If the referee can't be sure, he can't point at the centre ice. And that was clearly high stick

  • thats a no goal when you look at the last replay as the comentators said its above the crossbar

  • Why Leafs fan always questions goals etc... You're born to loose, just live with it! GO HABS GO!

  • Hey bitch leafs beat habs tonight 5-2 so shut up man it dosent matter who your favorite team it the fact is that, that was a no goal.

  • it accualy shouldnt of because its interference on the goalie and carolina had posetion so that shot should even have been taken plus toskala didnt have his stick

  • is this the same game where blake's goal didn't count? damn refs!!

  • No goal all its all a Carolina ref set-up

  • it is always a carolina ref set up, weve had soo much calls against us, and remember in the year after the lockout we were eliminated by one point ater a carolina win? Then remember the OT "no goal" when the puck crosses the line TWICE... yep, this is all a setup

  • inconclusive evidence goal couldnt see where the puck made contact with the stick goal

  • No goal... high stick. they cant call it differently because it is their home team.

  • No goal. All Carolina refs are gay.

  • One more reason for all hockey fans to be glad this is Koharsky's last season as an NHL official. He has decided the outcome of more games than any player that ever laced up skates.

  • to close to call i say goal

  • I think that it is to close to call. I think that he was hit making his stick go up but the real question is when did the puck hit his stick. I am a Hurricanes fan but really dont know im not saying its a goal because im a fan of the team but I think that it is a goal.

  • i agree on this one it is a goal but very very close im a redwings fan but i think it was inconclusive evidence to prove that it wasnt a goal

  • NO GOAL

  • i like seeing goal that are no good, but helps the leafs loses. I really like it

  • ABSOLUTLY NO GOAL

  • no goal!!

  • No goal

  • O M G ! ! ! ! N O G O A L ! ! ! !

  • no fucken goal!

  • the stick was over the crossbar.........no goal.

  • who won this game

    ?

    ?

  • no goal

  • no goal!!!

  • no goal

  • G0@!

  • no goal

  • carolina refs have screwed the leafs over way to many times!

  • It's not the refs, its the NHL War Room in Toronto that make the calls on any reviews.

  • well, them too jokes

    but there have been so many garbage penalties cause a them

  • high stick

  • goal, toskalas glove was above the bar because he thought the shot was higher.

  • GO CANES!

  • no goal

  • Why is it that the one announcer is so biased?

  • no goal!

  • Dude wtf. Thats not a goal! His sticks over the bar!

  • fuck the refs they didnt allow blake goal but they alow this?

  • If there is a delayed call, the goal will count. Or atleast usually.

  • no goal 2:43

  • i dont know what u r ... but ur right these uneducated fucks like kerry fraser fucked us too for a game that matterd ... 2003 calgary flames vs tampa bay lightning ... game 7 martin gelinas .. front page of the newspaper next morining ... puck clearly on his pad crossed the goal line ... calgary flames in my eyes were 2003/2004 stanley cup champs .. but only in a america .. we have no say .. but your right no goal !!! good call on the vid count ... you work for the nhl lmao good call bro

  • bloody stick was higher then bob marley eh!!!!! good call

  • no goal

  • 1:11 guy gets his ass touched

  • wow this game had mager problems. I say 1 other video just like this for the leafs. NO GOAL

  • no goal his stick was over the cross bar

  • its impossible to tell. Especially the last replay with the best view possible. You can see how right before the puck was going up and higher than the crossbar, a player gets in the way and you cant see it. if it was originaly ruled goal, then they cant change the it and vice verca.

  • thats what i thought

  • Chyeah, it counts. The puck went in first. Duh.

  • ??????????

  • no walker's stick was over the cross bar hen he deflected the puuck it dont count

  • wow those refs suck

    leafs rock

  • thats bad news - the sun aint gonna shine anymore lol