good goal,very close though.looks like the blade of his stick is pointing up, above the crossbar, but as the puck makes contact with it, it is turning down, making it just at crossbar height...if they called no goal, that would have been a worse call than allowing it.
It counts because the call on the ice was a goal, and although it seems in one of the replays that the stick was high, the evidence needs to be 100% in disproving the call on the ice. There was no solid view of the play that showed the stick contact so the call on the ice stands.
the stick was slanted upward his stick blade was above the crossbar, but where the puck mad contact with the stick was lower then the blade....it hit on his shaft and that looked to be even with the crossbar, therefore its a GOAL!
Granted we got screwed by Carolina refs and Vancover refs this year (i'm not a leafs fan) I wanna point out that the quality that toronto saw may have been better from this view there is no conclusive evidence to say high sticking. And if the original call was goal then it must stand. and it's way to blurry on here to tell if it was a goal or a high stick
His stick seem high, but we can't tell where did the puck hit his stick. It's too easy to call it high sticking simply by using the highest point of the stick.
Was it really a goal? Dunno. But the replay is non-conclusive.
@suburbanindie o i know man thats such a bad goal like the goal with blake im not sure like thats a hard call and this calll was just horrible!! go caps! lol i just had to put that in there sorry
The officials did not have enough conclusive evidence to change their call. The call on the ice will stand if there is not conclusive evidence to prove otherwise.
i think some people are confused in one of the shots...what actually looks like the crossbar is actually the end boards...so be careful in deciphering the two before you say "it's obviously no goal"
Yes i agree with don coharsky it should count the hole stick has to be over it was not over the cross bar only the blade of the stick he did not hit it with the blade.
Good thing the NHL doesnt use video quality like this to make its decisions. Don't blame the refs, blame the NHL for not putting 2 cameras in place (one on each end of the goal line) to review this exact thing.
The refs should be made to understand simple Physics before they are allowed to officiate. ..or maybe just a common sense class. They blow too many of these calls.
im no maple leaf fan but that was defenetly no goal... the stick was obviously on top of the cross bar you can clearly see it on one of the last replays
While I agree that this is the wrong call, the blame can't be placed on the referees on ice here. The review process takes place in the "war room" in Toronto and it seems basic math escapes them. I've seen so many goals that were clearly hit with a high stick allowed I wonder why they even both reviewing them. Kicking motion also escapes me. I've seen Lupul kick a goal in and have it count, and earlier this week Crosby clearly kicked a puck in. All NHL officiating is inconsistent and sucks.
the ref's pissed me pff sp much that game, Blakes disallowed was obvioussly in, and this was a high stick, i dunnno, looks pretty favored and one sided to me
They say that the last revision took 20 minutes to be made... so I think they simply wanted to make a quick decision and go with the original decision. Haste makes waste...
it accualy shouldnt of because its interference on the goalie and carolina had posetion so that shot should even have been taken plus toskala didnt have his stick
it is always a carolina ref set up, weve had soo much calls against us, and remember in the year after the lockout we were eliminated by one point ater a carolina win? Then remember the OT "no goal" when the puck crosses the line TWICE... yep, this is all a setup
One more reason for all hockey fans to be glad this is Koharsky's last season as an NHL official. He has decided the outcome of more games than any player that ever laced up skates.
I think that it is to close to call. I think that he was hit making his stick go up but the real question is when did the puck hit his stick. I am a Hurricanes fan but really dont know im not saying its a goal because im a fan of the team but I think that it is a goal.
i dont know what u r ... but ur right these uneducated fucks like kerry fraser fucked us too for a game that matterd ... 2003 calgary flames vs tampa bay lightning ... game 7 martin gelinas .. front page of the newspaper next morining ... puck clearly on his pad crossed the goal line ... calgary flames in my eyes were 2003/2004 stanley cup champs .. but only in a america .. we have no say .. but your right no goal !!! good call on the vid count ... you work for the nhl lmao good call bro
its impossible to tell. Especially the last replay with the best view possible. You can see how right before the puck was going up and higher than the crossbar, a player gets in the way and you cant see it. if it was originaly ruled goal, then they cant change the it and vice verca.
NO GOAL
BRADEN356 3 days ago
!<3 Vesa Toskala <3!
zonetrip 1 month ago
ITS A GOAL, WHAT DID I SAY YOU CAN NEVER TRUST THOSE DAMN ZEBRAS
XXxblismylifexx 1 month ago
240p.
turreu 1 month ago
no goal
aasidell 2 months ago
Goal
vivaportugalhabs 5 months ago
HighStick There No Goal! >:(
SharkyFobister71 5 months ago
no goal to high
DaHockeyMan7 7 months ago
No goal
Mbusch11 7 months ago
NO GOAL
22bruinsfan 7 months ago
Leafs suck
killerguitar44 8 months ago
f**king craolina bitches toronto could of got that goal
XxCryhahacryxX 8 months ago
this was a horrible game with video review.
BookemDeno 9 months ago
High stick, refs r retarded
hebejame 11 months ago
lol its soaring above the bar and it goes out of side and then its a goal. does this take a physics major to figure out?
let88it88be 11 months ago
good goal,very close though.looks like the blade of his stick is pointing up, above the crossbar, but as the puck makes contact with it, it is turning down, making it just at crossbar height...if they called no goal, that would have been a worse call than allowing it.
MrDaemonB 1 year ago
@MrDaemonB Thank you for being the one person acting over 13 in this comment section :)
moomoomoonation 10 months ago
its narrow but high stick, no goal.
HAPPYPANDA53 1 year ago
no goal
slooopz 1 year ago
no goal!!!!
tailspirate 1 year ago
no goal
ghythb 1 year ago
NO GOAL
malkin73 1 year ago
It counts because the call on the ice was a goal, and although it seems in one of the replays that the stick was high, the evidence needs to be 100% in disproving the call on the ice. There was no solid view of the play that showed the stick contact so the call on the ice stands.
Showmeyourtitties 1 year ago
@Showmeyourtitties your wrong lol
TRamb12 1 year ago
nooo goal!!!!!!!!!!
crazyharry1190 1 year ago 2
the stick was slanted upward his stick blade was above the crossbar, but where the puck mad contact with the stick was lower then the blade....it hit on his shaft and that looked to be even with the crossbar, therefore its a GOAL!
DustyDinkleman26 1 year ago
Granted we got screwed by Carolina refs and Vancover refs this year (i'm not a leafs fan) I wanna point out that the quality that toronto saw may have been better from this view there is no conclusive evidence to say high sticking. And if the original call was goal then it must stand. and it's way to blurry on here to tell if it was a goal or a high stick
Kartracer6 2 years ago
High Stick = No Goal
Sw33tVictory 2 years ago
@Sw33tVictory YEP U R RIGHT
techdudewwe 1 year ago
no goal
theboredkid100 2 years ago
Puck was hit with a high stick ...... no goal
Chrisrocks007 2 years ago
2:23 the best view. no goal. damn nhl refs always favor the home team
MinnesotaWildFan270 2 years ago 3
no goal
tipoo0189 2 years ago
no goal
MRHAB50 2 years ago
no goal
jaygeoff111 2 years ago
1:05 looks like it say:FUCKER
teenagehbk 2 years ago 12
@teenagehbk
lol YEAH
MinnesotaWildFan270 2 years ago
@teenagehbk lol you are deaf
MrBucoman 2 months ago
GO LEAFS GO !!!!
newf4412 2 years ago
goal
sakke113 2 years ago
His stick seem high, but we can't tell where did the puck hit his stick. It's too easy to call it high sticking simply by using the highest point of the stick.
Was it really a goal? Dunno. But the replay is non-conclusive.
Nashtak 2 years ago
ok umm....i think these reffs hate the leafs
retardsinactoin 2 years ago 3
good call
Auzzienum1 2 years ago
goal
MrWWEPPVResults26 2 years ago
not conclusive dudes
yaman258 2 years ago
No goal
zizispoonie876 2 years ago 25
Oh wow. The NHL's even dumber than I thought.
sjsharx22 2 years ago
No goal!
Hawkeeman15 2 years ago
Wow high stick duh
ConvoyPLUS 2 years ago 2
This is the second HORRIBLE call in this game.
For the record, I am neither a Toronto nor Carolina fan.
suburbanindie 2 years ago
I AM a Carolina fan, and I have to agree with you.
KiehlHyre 2 years ago
@suburbanindie o i know man thats such a bad goal like the goal with blake im not sure like thats a hard call and this calll was just horrible!! go caps! lol i just had to put that in there sorry
oriolesmagic33 2 years ago
that is not a goal
hockeyrules197 2 years ago 2
goal.
Jumpieboi 2 years ago
NO GOAL!
NHLHockeyfreak 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what does referee do in 1:08
Tobbasd 2 years ago
Comment removed
Tobbasd 2 years ago
Comment removed
Tobbasd 2 years ago
No goal for sure. I am an NHL goal looker
NHLHockeyfreak 2 years ago
Wow. Really?
Yet you do don't know that your job is actually called a NHL Goal reviewer?
I wish I knew as much is you.
Jumpieboi 2 years ago
I dont work for the NHL stupid. I just look at vids with goal or no goal titles and i say my answer
NHLHockeyfreak 2 years ago
This was no goal. But it doesnt freaking matter. We go so screwed over in this game
sniperstar 2 years ago 2
no goal
jq2htf57 2 years ago
goal
wolfea184 2 years ago
no goal
bigguyrobbie 2 years ago
NO GOAL
Flyers2cup1227 2 years ago
damn toronto got screwed that day didnt they? haha
matthebrat1228 2 years ago
NO GOAL
vicselbz 2 years ago
I Think no goal, what joe bowen said, Toskala was gonna catch the puck and his glove was above the crossbar so i think no goal
DCShoesSkater 2 years ago
no goal but who cares
HurricAnesHOCKey4 2 years ago
No goal. High stick.
01rightwing 2 years ago
NO GOAL way to high but nice tip!
playmakertom 2 years ago
goal judging by the offal futage
huetrox3901 2 years ago
Very unfair match, atleast the leafs goal should of counted then
Toronto2245 2 years ago
I think you might be a tiny bit biased there...
theworldyoulove33 2 years ago
The officials did not have enough conclusive evidence to change their call. The call on the ice will stand if there is not conclusive evidence to prove otherwise.
cornyvideos 2 years ago 3
NO WAY
Capsfan1998 2 years ago
NO GOAL!
akacsh 2 years ago
i think some people are confused in one of the shots...what actually looks like the crossbar is actually the end boards...so be careful in deciphering the two before you say "it's obviously no goal"
jmiller006 2 years ago
watch Blakes no goal on this same game, carolina refs are the most gayest refs ever
MeKid09 2 years ago
well u no that the review goes to toronto so really u should blame them not the ref.
Go Leafs!
DonCherryFan44 2 years ago 2
you could never see the puck over the line on that goal...even though it obviously was...the correct call was made in that instance.
jmiller006 2 years ago
what the fuck you talking about ?
nabystheman 2 years ago
watch the video, maybe you'll see what i'm talking about.
jmiller006 2 years ago
fuck waaaay high stick !
soafguitar 2 years ago
This was a crazy game. I remember watching this game because I am a Canes fan.
I think that this one could go either way. I don't think that the replays are that good.
hockeyrocker33 2 years ago
Yes i agree with don coharsky it should count the hole stick has to be over it was not over the cross bar only the blade of the stick he did not hit it with the blade.
Auzzienum1 2 years ago
dumbass!
nabystheman 2 years ago
GOALL
darkmag3303 2 years ago
not another dumbass god whats happening to the world
nabystheman 2 years ago
WOW thats really high haha way over the crossbar
nprevo22 2 years ago 2
Good thing the NHL doesnt use video quality like this to make its decisions. Don't blame the refs, blame the NHL for not putting 2 cameras in place (one on each end of the goal line) to review this exact thing.
zippolight2002 2 years ago
NO GOAL
owna10 2 years ago
The refs should be made to understand simple Physics before they are allowed to officiate. ..or maybe just a common sense class. They blow too many of these calls.
SouthP17CD 2 years ago
copy and paste
2. send this to 2 other videos.
3. hold your breath for 10 seconds
4. press refresh twice
5. LOOK AT YOUR BACKGROUND IT WILL BE FREAKY
Williqc 2 years ago
high stick much...the commentators have better calls than the goal judge
sabresx 2 years ago 2
wierd game
sutishman 2 years ago
In this same game Blake was robbed of a great goal because Ward kicked it out.
MaxClarkso 2 years ago
no goal
brewins7 2 years ago
i think it´s no goal
hockeyjakke84 2 years ago
copy and paste
2. send this to 2 other videos.
3. hold your breath for 10 seconds
4. press refresh twice
5. LOOK AT YOUR BACKGROUND IT WILL BE FREAKY
Kompostoori 2 years ago
GO BLACKHAWKS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
playaspace 2 years ago 3
im no maple leaf fan but that was defenetly no goal... the stick was obviously on top of the cross bar you can clearly see it on one of the last replays
shutupyoumime 2 years ago
goal, for sure
baerli150875 2 years ago
no goal
lovesport13 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
copy and paste
2. send this to 2 other videos.
3. hold your breath for 10 seconds
4. press refresh twice
5. LOOK AT YOUR BACKGROUND IT WILL BE FREAKY
markyoung313 2 years ago
hy stick damn it fuck
jason07099 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
copy and paste
2. send this to 2 other videos.
3. hold your breath for 10 seconds
4. press refresh twice
5. LOOK AT YOUR BACKGROUND IT WILL BE FREAKY
bbark25 2 years ago
u stupid fucken ref we could of won the stanley CUP (just kidding ) CAUSE have not won the cup sence 69 !
Goaliefriend 2 years ago
Judging by your grammar, you haven't been in school since 69 either!
XanderProductions 2 years ago
who fixes their grammar for a comment on youtube?, relax..
HockeySeanX 2 years ago
ya this game was fucking blown by shitty refs, shitty people in the review booth, and joe bowen.
ru11et 2 years ago
While I agree that this is the wrong call, the blame can't be placed on the referees on ice here. The review process takes place in the "war room" in Toronto and it seems basic math escapes them. I've seen so many goals that were clearly hit with a high stick allowed I wonder why they even both reviewing them. Kicking motion also escapes me. I've seen Lupul kick a goal in and have it count, and earlier this week Crosby clearly kicked a puck in. All NHL officiating is inconsistent and sucks.
demonlag 2 years ago
walker doesn't deserve it. Nice high stick you fuck.
lifeofhockey 2 years ago 2
are you retard it was in ?
macsam10 2 years ago
it was in but its a high stick u cant tip a puck if your stick is over the cross bar
04berlinwood04 2 years ago
the ref's pissed me pff sp much that game, Blakes disallowed was obvioussly in, and this was a high stick, i dunnno, looks pretty favored and one sided to me
Doug1996104 2 years ago
Euhhh High STICK!!! DUHHH
claudel67123 2 years ago
NO GOAL
mattymoo1017 2 years ago 2
those reffs are ball sacks that no goal fer shure
Tylersouthwell 2 years ago
no goal the goal judging sucks shit this game two bad calls
LASABRE14 2 years ago
shouldnt have been a goal and is this the same game where Blakes goal didnt count???????
shadowmeist4 2 years ago 2
yes it is
momo2die4 2 years ago
They say that the last revision took 20 minutes to be made... so I think they simply wanted to make a quick decision and go with the original decision. Haste makes waste...
VisnenBros 2 years ago
i am awesome at goal judging the call is:NO GOAL REFS SUCK
karn97 2 years ago 2
it was a goal
ANTTU24 2 years ago
I am a Pro at goals and no goals. this is NO GOAL
NHLHockeyfreak 2 years ago 2
wow, what a terrible call. If the referee can't be sure, he can't point at the centre ice. And that was clearly high stick
Nevahood1 2 years ago 2
thats a no goal when you look at the last replay as the comentators said its above the crossbar
IceHockeyAddict1 2 years ago
Why Leafs fan always questions goals etc... You're born to loose, just live with it! GO HABS GO!
LeGermQC 2 years ago
Hey bitch leafs beat habs tonight 5-2 so shut up man it dosent matter who your favorite team it the fact is that, that was a no goal.
Leahy777 2 years ago
it accualy shouldnt of because its interference on the goalie and carolina had posetion so that shot should even have been taken plus toskala didnt have his stick
ShelNum1 2 years ago
is this the same game where blake's goal didn't count? damn refs!!
Raptinox 2 years ago
No goal all its all a Carolina ref set-up
Sycondude5 2 years ago
it is always a carolina ref set up, weve had soo much calls against us, and remember in the year after the lockout we were eliminated by one point ater a carolina win? Then remember the OT "no goal" when the puck crosses the line TWICE... yep, this is all a setup
goleafsgo0293 2 years ago
inconclusive evidence goal couldnt see where the puck made contact with the stick goal
isk84lifeok 2 years ago
No goal... high stick. they cant call it differently because it is their home team.
shiothead6661 2 years ago
No goal. All Carolina refs are gay.
MeKid09 2 years ago
One more reason for all hockey fans to be glad this is Koharsky's last season as an NHL official. He has decided the outcome of more games than any player that ever laced up skates.
Satirious 2 years ago
to close to call i say goal
pensrok43 2 years ago
I think that it is to close to call. I think that he was hit making his stick go up but the real question is when did the puck hit his stick. I am a Hurricanes fan but really dont know im not saying its a goal because im a fan of the team but I think that it is a goal.
hockeyrocker33 2 years ago
i agree on this one it is a goal but very very close im a redwings fan but i think it was inconclusive evidence to prove that it wasnt a goal
FrankRizzo140 2 years ago
NO GOAL
Lilnicksta11 2 years ago
i like seeing goal that are no good, but helps the leafs loses. I really like it
RiVs34 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fuck you bitch
ryunmcneill 3 years ago
ABSOLUTLY NO GOAL
AHA930 3 years ago 2
no goal!!
sabreplaya77 3 years ago 2
No goal
Sycondude5 3 years ago 2
O M G ! ! ! ! N O G O A L ! ! ! !
hockeytylerhockey 3 years ago 2
no fucken goal!
RageMachinie 3 years ago 2
the stick was over the crossbar.........no goal.
airsoft950 3 years ago
who won this game
?
?
SmileyandFrowney 3 years ago
no goal
HockeyBG 3 years ago
no goal!!!
CLOVERFIELD444 3 years ago
no goal
sabreplaya77 3 years ago
G0@!
hockeyGoD1339 3 years ago
no goal
OilersFanatick 3 years ago
carolina refs have screwed the leafs over way to many times!
kevinjj001 3 years ago
It's not the refs, its the NHL War Room in Toronto that make the calls on any reviews.
dangler2148 3 years ago
well, them too jokes
but there have been so many garbage penalties cause a them
kevinjj001 3 years ago
high stick
kevinjj001 3 years ago
goal, toskalas glove was above the bar because he thought the shot was higher.
redwingfan324 3 years ago
GO CANES!
m0uthwash 3 years ago
no goal
MRHAB50 3 years ago
Why is it that the one announcer is so biased?
21DieselBoy21 3 years ago
no goal!
voldagar 3 years ago
Dude wtf. Thats not a goal! His sticks over the bar!
Walaument 3 years ago
fuck the refs they didnt allow blake goal but they alow this?
MuskAintShit 3 years ago
If there is a delayed call, the goal will count. Or atleast usually.
MrScienceTypeGuy 3 years ago
no goal 2:43
lbyhhockey333 3 years ago
i dont know what u r ... but ur right these uneducated fucks like kerry fraser fucked us too for a game that matterd ... 2003 calgary flames vs tampa bay lightning ... game 7 martin gelinas .. front page of the newspaper next morining ... puck clearly on his pad crossed the goal line ... calgary flames in my eyes were 2003/2004 stanley cup champs .. but only in a america .. we have no say .. but your right no goal !!! good call on the vid count ... you work for the nhl lmao good call bro
robynesman 3 years ago
bloody stick was higher then bob marley eh!!!!! good call
robynesman 3 years ago
no goal
terrenceman5 3 years ago
1:11 guy gets his ass touched
Aeonsmagicks 3 years ago
wow this game had mager problems. I say 1 other video just like this for the leafs. NO GOAL
akacsh 3 years ago
no goal his stick was over the cross bar
xXxICE23xXx 3 years ago
its impossible to tell. Especially the last replay with the best view possible. You can see how right before the puck was going up and higher than the crossbar, a player gets in the way and you cant see it. if it was originaly ruled goal, then they cant change the it and vice verca.
BriDirt 3 years ago
thats what i thought
redwingfan324 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Chyeah, it counts. The puck went in first. Duh.
Drpepper1820 3 years ago
Chyeah, it counts. The puck went in first. Duh.
Drpepper1820 3 years ago
??????????
StephaneDoucet78 3 years ago
no walker's stick was over the cross bar hen he deflected the puuck it dont count
stella8697 3 years ago
wow those refs suck
leafs rock
CFLNHLFIFAFAN 3 years ago 3
thats bad news - the sun aint gonna shine anymore lol
fascistamericadotnet 3 years ago