moon landing: July 20, 1969

[2nasafakedit]

First FAKE moon landing: July 20, 1969

In 2010 Nasa still can't go to the moon

Nasa = US Criminal NWO Govt

[keeganwebber]

@realdrummer110 If you calculate the reflectiveness of regolith, it explains the illumination.

[vidfan30]

yup i agree no bullshite, n like i sed b4, no footage of a nearby planet, or a star or a shot of the earth from where they stood. why the hell not?

[Sam67SG]

@vidfan30

John Young from Apollo 16 shot several photos of the stars from the lunar surface.

[vidfan30]

@Sam67SG umm i dont know about that, a lot of researchers have somehow or tried to discredit the entire lunar landing pointing out some very interesting facts or maybe some conpiracy theories but no doubt intruiging footage and facts. so i find the whole landing questionable. but then again its all a matter of opinion and not real basis to provide my coomment as fact, it is simply a point of view.

[enchiladatoda]

I approve of the spoken commentary, but please lose the harpsichord! Very distracting!

[user17v]

fake

[elbuggo]

Soap science.

[darkalligator]

the USSR made the first moon landing, the USA did it after, but it has been known as it was the first because people were there. but the true is the USSR get there before.

[silentsuffering]

No they didnt USSR where the first in space not to the moon.

[Big5Productions1]

That is BS, they were the first in space to circle the earth, we beat them hands down to the Moon!

[sasuschrist]

hands down true but very close for the russian moon shot was ONE week before amrican but blew up on launch pad

[hypobusa]

@ 3.33 - 3.35

what are all the pretty lights???

[Lellabella603]

Time 6:44.  Rope/wire movement seems too fast. Was this speeded up?

[zeking0302]

its a vacume, so there's no air friction slowing the rope down.

[glenpovey]

Well, "Nobullshite", I am not expert in photography but I do know a great deal about looking through telescopes as I have a BSC in Astrophysics (Cardiff): I still say that man NEVER went to the moon and that the stars should still have been visible if the US pigs had gone there.

[TheJomogogo]

LOL@ "degree in astrophysics" you must have been the most retarded graduate EVAR. Don't tell your collegues what you think they'll laugh at how fuckass stupid you are.

[nonametoshow]

FAKE!!!

[glenpovey]

No stars! Why? Because this footage is totally faked. No one can accurately plot how the stars would look from the moon frame by frame, because of the librations of Earth and Moon and their constantly changing azimuths and elliptics. And to avoid embarrasment if anyone ever does succeed in showing how the stars should have looked, the US pigs make weird excuses for their total absence. Advances in astrophysics will finally force the USA to admit that the whole moon landing was a great big hoax.

[TheJomogogo]

Dude I know like I'm so sure we went to the moon, they'd all of got supar powers from driving through the Van Halen Belt like the Fantastic Four but none of them even got Xray vision so that proves it was fake. Simple logic. Me an my hoax friends all agree. Tomorrow we're gonna build a fort.

[Nobullshite]

Another statement out of ignorance. Simple logic. The actual dose the astronauts would have received is about 2 rem. That's a chest x-ray. If you would read a book or passed 8th grade science you would know that all you need to protect you from low energy particles "the van allen belt" is a few inches of metal and thats the spacecraft. To minimize any potential dangers, NASA sent the Apollo crafts just on the outskirts of the belt, where the radiation is lowest and the belt is thinnest. Pwned

[Nobullshite]

Well this shows you are ignorant 100%. The reason why you can't see the stars is because they are to dim for the exsposure the camera is set on. Try taking a picture with a regular camera at night under a streetlight. You will see that there are no stars either. Really. You people speak from ignorance. You have no idea what you are talking about and it makes you silly. I like to know what you know about photography? If you new anything you would know this my friend.

[byrdsmaniac]

Kubrick did a great job!

[raoulhery]

where are the fucking stars???

[StuartMurray94]

untrue as fuck you retard. there more evidence to prove that it is fucking true rather than to show that its not. And the reason we havnt done it since is because the nasa Space programme was on a contract with the government which ended after the moon landing so they can no longer fund trips or so on. Fucking read up on your shity questions mate. Fuck sake...

[esaslaw]

we had several lunar landings after apollo 11

[MsGrassy]

the moon landing was filmed entirely at area 51,thats why until now no one can get near it!only a few people knows about it.low level personnel at nasa thinks that they are really watching the moon landing!

[SpreadingtheMuse]

"area 51"

But what about all your buddies who SWEAR it was filmed in the Hawaiian lava fields? In the Craters of the Moon National Monument? Etc etc etc.

If you twats cant even get your stories straight amongst YOURSELVES, you'll never convince the rest of us. ;)

[yavuzedessa]

BİG LİE

[scorp8pus]

The only person that has done any "moonwalking" in the last 50 years was Michael Jackson!

Peace Michael.

[TheJomogogo]

I can prove they faked it. To get to the moon they had to go through the Van Halen Belt thingie, and would have gotten supar powers like the Fantastic Four, but none of the astronauts even got Xray vision so it must be fake. Tomorrow me an my hoax friends are gonna build a fort in the backyard.

[Nobullshite]

Wrong. You people say the dumbest things. If you knew anything you would know all you need to protect yourself from low energy particles "the vanallen belt" is a few inches of metal. The astronauts get wacked with about 2 rem! To minimize any potential dangers, NASA sent the Apollo crafts just on the outskirts of the belt, where the radiation is lowest and the belt is thinnest. So they weren't in the belt for very long at all. You have no proof buddy.

[TheJomogogo]

Dude....it was a joke, lighten up. It's a waste of time trying to reason with moontards, so I just go for the laugh.

[KaOssis]

Hahahaha, I think you'ed better get yourself some real education about Nature instead of Nasi NASA reverse psychology Nobullshite, cause the Van allen Belts is not a few inces of metal, is trapped within 4000 miles or or so of the Earth's surface. It consists mainly a high-energy protons (10-50 MeV) and is a by-product of the cosmic radiation, a thin drizzle of very fast protons and nuclei which apparently fill all our galaxy, si yur space must fit into a flippin match box then, ahahahaha!

[realdrummer110]

@Nobullshite Fake as fuck. Go back to your comic books son. You are stupid.

[TheJomogogo]

By the same logic they descended into the Marianas Trench in 1962 and haven't done it since so that must have been faked too. Where did you get the idea that we can't do it now anyway? The logic of a hoaxturd, so child-like.

[RetroVGamer]

because back then people were more driven. once we got to the moon. it was a sense of, now what?, and the public got bored. there was no reason to go back, not to mention the money it would cost to go to the moon.

[phill90212]

Great special effects for the day. Amazing what they can do in a movie lot.

[777TRiuMPHaNT777]

apollo 11 have never been on the moon.

this video have been made in studio.

look on the shadows? they have different directions, but the source of light was only the sun!

and if we`ll make playback faster, we`ll see that this video has been made on earth!

[RetroVGamer]

You're all ignorant and letting these poorly presented conspiracy books and documentaries to influence your simple minds.

[StuartMurray94]

shut up you fucking loser. You listen to what you hear on the internet. Your just an ass hole. Theres more evidence to prove that its true than there is to try persuade people its not.

[FreeWorld99]

I live. It must be a fake

[Niuka112]

fake ass shiiiehhh xD

[fordie2507]

at 5.53 he climbs down,why is the camera moveing as tho a person is holding it?yet he was the 1st one out the eagle? also if it was on the side of the eagle why would it shake like that any way? all the other camera shots are steady

[NakedCreep]

Could you tell that with the still images the camera would still shake?

[DrainExpress]

Thanks for posting! Awesome !

[usukker]

fake fake fkae , nasas fake videos

[SpreadingtheMuse]

"fake fake fkae , nasas fake videos"

Dumb dumb dumb youtube conspiratards.

[xazarof]

You have knowledge yeah !!!!! Spreading themuse go watch some videos and come back !! ONLY HAVE 2 QUESTIONS?

Where are the FUCKING stars and since SUN was theur only power of light how come shadows are in different directions ! Explain if you can ! If you can't STFU !

[SpreadingtheMuse]

"Where are the FUCKING stars"

WHERE are the fucking professional photographers to say that there SHOULD BE ANY? So you cut and pasted a dorky webpage and pretend that makes you clever?

A REAL photographer would have given you big words like "exposure time" and "Shutter speed," but an amateur and newbie would never know what those meant. ;)

Bottom line, if the Professionals dont have any problem, we're certainly not going to listen to the wannabe amateurs. ;)

[SpreadingtheMuse]

"theur only power of light how come shadows are in different directions"

THE LAND IS NOT FLAT Einstein.

So you cut and paste two perfectly predictable worn out retreaded and refuted and ridiculed hoax page cliches? Get your OWN material junior. Something that isnt shot down 12 times daily.

[realdrummer110]

@SpreadingtheMuse yeah so why are the shadows going different directions? Don't give me that retarded 'The moon isn't flat " answer that gets shot down a dozen times a second.

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@realdrummer110

It gets shot down? Really? Then by all means, SHOOT IT DOWN.

I've seen professional analysis by actual photographers who actual had pics of the same thing happening on Earth. If you can shoot all that down you had better do so, for thats the answer.

And I get to ask you a question, if there are two lightsources, how come there arent two shadows? Try it yourself at home. Hit yourself with two lights. You always get two shadows. You can see it on TV all the time.

[realdrummer110]

@SpreadingtheMuse Failure after how long in here dude? Troll fails miserably. Nasa is history

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@realdrummer110

You mean you CANT "shoot down" the "moon isnt flat?" And you got caught in a retarded bluff? That was pathetically easy to expose?

You dont say. ;)

With losers like you running around, I bet NASA's really scared now. ;)

[kella587us]

how can catch the vedio edge of the moon and man ?

[GodMatt50]

UFO 3:20

[moonscam]

Turn blue or turn RED!!!

[NCOProductions]

Eagle go for landing...

Afirm housten....BAMMMMM

Ohhh shit...Back to chimps..

[EGMAG]

HA AHA HA HA HA HA

[mikereynolds4444]

try muting...there is no sound in space anyways

[96VideoAngel69]

this would be better if there were no music and a peron talking the background... =/