WTC 7 was on fire at 9.30 am

[zppz]

i'd like to know how falling debris starts fires in the first place

[irobot2009able]

hey! genius so what the building was on fire so was a steel structured building in madrid spain that burned for hour's and never collapsed building 7 didn't burn not even close to as long and it collapsed yeah! right 7 had help falling these were the only steel structured buildings that were taken down by fire in the history of the world wake up !

[thr337]

dude... 9:30 am... wtf... that's such blatant evidence of pre-planning

[AccessDenied55]

Im no theorist but if the people who so called "pulled" WTC7 were smart.

They probably didnt want to waste all that money reparing WTC7 after all that fire damage and debris damage it has sustained. So technically whats so "weird" about that?

[bingorev]

@AccessDenied55 Well, it is "wired" that they managed to do the job in half a day. Prepearing for a pulling like this takes weeks of preparations.

[punxsutawneybarney]

Mr. Levy told NOVA that the towers came down because the jet fuel melted the structural steel. That's loony tunes. Jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel.

See my video:

The 9/11 "Deep Mystery" and the Crazy Engineers

[TheMKMonarch]

There is no indication of fires in WTC7 before the Twin Towers collapse.

The firealarm wasn't activated until the first tower, WTC2, had collapsed.

Either Mathews Levy did mistakenly said 9:30 instead of 10:30am or he spread willingly disinformation.

[flammingknight1096]

it burned at that time because of debris from the first tower i know because every year on 9/11 i record every episode of that day on the history channel

[jkamwal2]

@flammingknight1096 9:30 was before the collapse = no debris

[xxxdaedlusxxx]

the problem is when you watch 5 videos of buildings (that were a whole lot cheaper built then wt7) burn for 2 and 3 days and the steel structure still stands, you have to ask yourselves how the wt7 fires somehow made it downstairs and severed the main vertical columns to form such a controlled collapse. was the fire hotter and faster? were there explosives? who knows, i for one think the 2 cracks in the front of the building just b4 the penthouse collapses is a bit odd.

[coppercabxx]

Tim Osman better known as Osama Bin Ladin. "Tim Osman" was the name assigned to him by the CIA for his tour of the U.S. and U.S. military bases, in search of political support and armaments. There is some evidence that Tim Osman visited the White House. There is certainty that Tim Osman toured some U.S. military bases, even receiving special demonstrations of the latest equipment. Why hasn't this been reported in the major media?

[AccessDenied55]

@coppercabxx Liar asshole! Bin Laden was a honey farm operator in southern Thailand! Fucking dumb ass douche

[tokeitup10]

I dare you to show the collapse, or will that defeat your argument?

[tarzan694]

everybody know by now that bldg 7 was a inside job

[forthe9two5]

How the fuck does the most protected building in new york with top technology not have a sprinkler system to put out fires? America is going to change soon. How will the people react when they find out it was a lie.

[cancanbiker]

@forthe9two5

the sprinklers in 7 were turned off on 9 11 at around 8 am.

source: BBC's attempt at debunking wtc 7

[AccessDenied55]

@forthe9two5 It did have Sprinkler System

But it had to be manually turned on by someone in the building,but it couldnt because everyone was evacuated from the building

[1enzeder]

demolition.

[ArcanineKing]

@1enzeder That's funny.

Actual reports say that the first tower to fall was the South Tower, which collapsed at approximately 9:59 AM. The north fell sometime later at 10:28 AM. Both towers burned between 80-100 minutes.

So if WTC7 had fires at around 9:30 AM, I am pretty sure the story doesn't fit. Also, no steel skyscraper on earth has ever collapsed due to fire... ever. WTC7 had officer fires, ranging from 400-800 F, that's not even enough to weaken steel.

Do your research.

[ArcanineKing]

@ArcanineKing Not to mention, the structure integrity was never 'compromised'. The WTC7 building had its trusses compromised as per the NIST reports, but they never tell you of the 89 perimeter and core columns in the tower that goes from the foundation to the top floor. Those are enough to hold the building, even if four or ten of them are damaged or weakening. The mechanical house does not, in any way, cause a symmetrical collapse of a building.

[ArcanineKing]

@ArcanineKing Because any building wouldn't suddenly fall at near free fall speed without any resistance met, not even the entire building would collapse at the same time, entirely, without first weakening it's support. Which was never touched. The building only burnt in a dozen floors, all offset from the 47 floors the building has. The only generators that were working on the building, that had fuel, were on the 5th and 9th floor.

Seriously, do your research. NIST is unreliable.

[ArcanineKing]

@ArcanineKing So a steel skyscraper with over 500 tons of steel, encased in concrete, collapses on a symmetrical manner, when the mechanical house collapses within the building, possibly demolishing about 10 floors or a little more than that, the other floors slowing it down as per the law of conservation of energy, (not likely), which the building defies it, and falls entirely without any resistance at all. There's not even a point of weakest resistance here.

This is a violation of gravity.

[wkwickham]

whaaaaa?

this proves nothing - there is no time reference of the fire shown and the narrator even tells you the fires started after the bulds fell on them

the only proof given is a two second splice of a video of a non-witness?

really?

omg - I'm convinced now

[touko2999]

inside job

[DaSamuraiNoob]

thats what they get for not praising budha!

[tzarBHD]

lmfao, that proves that the 9/11 comission was a fucking joke!

[SelectedHandfull]

i dont get why building 7 was even on fire to begin with. wtc 3, 4, and 5 did NOT collapse and were closer to the towers

[noonesflower]

And why did it fall in the manner of a controlled demolition?

[bweazel]

History channel? Baahahaha. These are the same people that have shows on about UFOs people. Let's not take this bullshit too seriously.

[killcs]

yeah thx great work!

[themacx]

so?... buildings also burn for 24 hours.. 3 day's or longer.. it's the kind of collaps that's so wrong about the whole "story".

[footjob56]

Right, but someone told that the fire, in building 7, started after north tower collapse not before. Then why building 7 was on fire so soon? How did it begin to burn?

[themacx]

in the video they said 'falling debri' but being the north tower and the furthest away it sure is a wierd one isn't it.. good find.