Added: 2 years ago
From: 911truthncDotOrg
Views: 6,201
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (55)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What the Hell

  • What the Hell

  • agriculture, cuneiform, hamarabbis code, sail various other contributions in mythology Enki and Enilil, epic of gilgamesh ect ect

  • I guess that 2 sociopaths didn't like this video. Sometimes the truth is disgusting. Anyone responsible for this horror will be made to pay in ways unimaginable.

  • @Daddyo930 You are right, and the truth is that the population of the world is unsustainable, making killing, famine and poison necessary. So now you understand, you and every other citizen of the world made this necessary by ignoring the realities of the world we live in. This may sound harsh, but its better to kill off the populations from undesirable places like the middle east and africa than europe or north america. Reality sucks, go back to candyland if you don't like it.

  • @ScoundrelzNTwK Wow. Your really sick and need some love in your life. You don't sound harsh, you sound twisted. Like someone who has been pushed around all of his life by stronger yet less intelligent people. You find some sort of comfort in the fact that you are more intelligent than others. There is an important difference between knowledge and wisdom. With great power comes even greater responsibility. We are creators by nature. What you wish to create is hell on earth. Unacceptable.

  • @Daddyo930 Hell on earth already exists, and it exists because humanity has been irresponsible. It is the result of our actions, or lack there of, nothing more nothing less. Your empathetic views towards those on the receiving end of necessary action are the very reason the population is kept blissfully ignorant. I never said it was moral, but ensuring the longterm survival of the species and securing oil is more far important than some deformed babies in a part of the world no one cares about.

  • @ScoundrelzNTwK Wrong. Hydrogen gas, solar power, wind and thermal are all the energy you need to live and live free. There is no war for oil, only ancient artifacts. You have been terribly mislead. What you percieve to be reality is acutally a sick joke. You obviously have no clue as to what your talking about or dealing with. Start with the Sumerian translations. If you don't understand the history of this planet, you know nothing. Start with the history of this planet, then you will know.

  • @Daddyo930 Right, well at present those technologies represent tiny amounts of actual energy output. The oil wars are still kicking, its not about the oil itself, but who controls it, for relevant info, see pipelines. Great I can see this discussion heading into the spirit realm, I didn't realize you were privy to original historical documents and translations that gave you this great understanding of the world. Why don't you enlighten all of us since I apparently know nothing.

  • @ScoundrelzNTwK No this discussion will remain in the world of science and physics, not mysticism. Where did life on this planet start this time around? We will take this one step seeing as how your in the mood to be enlightened.

  • @Daddyo930 In 6000 bce? life didn't start at this time, life had been around long before that, I am assuming you are talking about modern homo sapiens

  • @ScoundrelzNTwK I said where not when. We will get to when in a minute. Where did life on this planet start this time around according to your understanding of history?

  • @Daddyo930 yes Mesopotamia (modern day iraq) is thought to be the cradle of civilization.

  • @ScoundrelzNTwK Correct. Do we know these people as the Sumerians?

  • @Daddyo930 yes

  • @ScoundrelzNTwK What were their contributions to civilization?

  • excellent video!

    this needs more views

    I've NEVER seen this Kaku interview before!

    

  • @shuggy555 Then go read the Geneva convention. You are misinformed. The toxcicity level in the weapon classifies it as a chemical and biological weapon which has been banned by the convention. 4 billion years of danger is a war crime and a crime against humanity because innocent people will suffer.

  • @shuggy555 So we can agree that using this weapon is a war crime and that any nation using this weapon is violating the Geneva convention's of war. Good. 4 billion years is a long time. Anyone who thinks that using this weapon is a viable alternative should be made to live in the contaminated area.

  • @shuggy555 So what your trying to say is that you know it kills innocent people but it's still ok to use? Is that where your mind is? Don't forget that this dust hangs around for 4 billion years. Never forget that. Anyone using this weapon is guilty of war crimes by the very fact that these weapons have the potential to kill unintended victims for 4 billion years. You amaze me with your cognitive dissonance. Good luck with that.

  • @shuggy555 I thought you knew something.  There is amazing hydrogen in water. H20, get it? Stan Myer developed the hydrogen fuel cell in 1973, during the oil embargo. The Japanese company Genepax in 2006 made cars that run on water. As far as DU goes, the evidence is out there in Iraq, Afghanistan and Europe that the use of these munitions are causing a high degree of cancers and birth defects. Don't be stupid, sending uranium through the mail is dangerous.

  • @shuggy555 The fact that radioactive dust stays around for 4 billion years should be reason enough not to use it because what's in the dirt half a world away will eventually end up in your back yard. I would also hazard an opinion and say that as far as nuclear power goes, there has got to be a better way to boil water to turn a turbine. In fact, I know there is. You could run everything on hydrogen gas who's biproduct is water. Very simple.

  • @shuggy555 Don't worry mr. Agent man sir, no one will be sending you a chunk of uranium. Do yourself a favor and get some education. You can start by going to the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) website where it clearly states that there is no such thing as a safe dose of radiation. You are sad with very little understanding of science and the nature of radiation. Did you even listen to what Kaku said? 4 billion years this will hang around.

  • @shuggy555 Don't worry mr. Agent man sir, no one will be sending you a chunk of uranium. Do yourself a favor and get some education. You can start by going to the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) website where it clearly states that there is no such thing as a safe dose of radiation. You are a sad with very little understanding of science and the nature of radiation.

  • Anyone with common sense with the internet can go to the IAEA website where they clearly say that there is no such thing as a safe dose of radiation. ANY radiation exposure raises your risk of getting cancers of the body. Using depleted uranium on the battlefield constitutes a war crime.

  • @shuggy555 Okay, then if I gave you a chunk of Uranium people are normally exposed to in the battlefield. You hold it for 3 years and see how you do. Unless if you're too coward to keep your own words.

  • the Pentagon decided to start using Depleted Uranium extensively in our munitions. Depleted Uranium (DU) was dirt cheap, since it was the left over material from processing Uranium into nuclear weapons and was normally just being thrown away -- in specially built containers in which all handling was done with men wearing special radiation protection suits, because in the commercial field, this stuff is considered "toxic waste"! from w w w . cuttingedge (dot) org

  • Radiation has almost NOTHING to do with the toxicity of DU. Uraniun is such a weak radioactive source that you can safely hold it in you hand for months. Just be sure to wash them after. The problems you are seeig from DU are caused by the TOXICITY of the metal itsself. Its slightly more toxic than lead, its a heavy metal. Its also teratogenic. You are in the right ballpark here but in the wrong inning.

  • @TheCaptainLulz Rather than looking at the activity of uranium itself, the source of radiation is probably the photoelectric effect from large nuclei.

    Uranium atoms capture photons of background gamma radiation and then reemit their energy as fast-moving electrons that act on the surrounding tissue in the same way as beta radiation. It also binds to DNA. Hence the Fallujah scandal.

    NewScientist had an article "How war debris could cause cancer" which you can read at newweapons(dot)org

  • @TheCaptainLulz -- Well, that's not quite accurate. The radiation danger is due to the super-fine size of DU particles as a round violently oxidizes, which then infiltrates every part of the environment, including food, water, air, land, homes -- and when consumed or ingested binds to organs and DNA -- where the radioactive & heavy-metal toxic effects are especially dangerous & long-term. This stuff is extremely hazardous, its use is essentially a warcrime which the US would oppose OTHERS using.

  • The end result is that they want 80% of us dead

    and no longer need us to have babies they can make babies all they want now without man or woman . when will people wake to this fact.

  • American soldiers=poor unprotected guinea pigs, who are dying to serve the interests of a bunch of lobbyists from the elite layers of their "society". "People" are blind and don't see that... they are brain shrunken pseudo nationalist idiots...

  • @vendetta007mike

    "Military men are just dumb stupid animals

    to be used as pawns in foreign policy." * Henry Kissinger, as quoted in Kiss the Boys Goodbye:

    How the United States Betrayed Its Own POW’s in Vietnam (1990)

    KISSINGER IS AS KNOWN ON OF THE BIGGEST ZIONISTS

    WHO ARE RULING USA!

  • @vendetta007mike couldn'T agree mo

    re

  • @vendetta007mike woa woa woah !!! wallabout the poor people of that country ??? :(

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Are you sure your source hasn't twisted the info you claim as fact?

  • expose your kids to depleted uranium! if you think that DU is not dangerous!

  • if you look up the depleted radiation used in US weaponry in Iraq you will see that you have made a mistake - many US war veterans who were in Iraq are suffering from the effects of depleted radiation used

    ome late-production M1A1HA and M1A2 Abrams tanks built after 1998 have DU reinforcement as part of the armor plating in the front of the hull and the front of the turret, and there is a program to upgrade the rest (see Chobham armor).

  • Lol. The US is using U-238 in their war on terror as we watch this video

  • Copy this video with a keep video website because the videos poisionDUst have been censored from youtube and are continually taken down. Lets keep this video on youtube. No matter how hard they try they can't stop us now.

  • DU also cause birth defects and can be transfered through semen.

  • The military's dirty little secret is being exposed. It's absolutely shameful the disregard of the DOD and the military industrial complex. Such short sightedness is typical of those in power.

  • Very Powerful vid. Phil Donahue was doing a docu. for the soldiers that were dieing of handleing these weapons, countries demanding we remove the contaminated soil where these weapons were used. A sad state of affairs. All done against men that were to be defending our country. we have to GROW UP really fast to help out our world Before we lose it. Peace!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more