Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 26;107 Suppl 1:1800-7. Epub 2009 Nov 16.
Evolution in health and medicine Sackler colloquium: Making evolutionary biology a basic science for medicine.
"Premedical students need evolution courses, possibly ones that emphasize medically relevant aspects. In medical school, evolutionary biology should be taught as one of the basic medical sciences."
why don't you make a video about paper's like this?
lolol you are so fucked up that it's astonishing... LOLOL
You didn't read the papers thouroughly, if you had the errors of interpretation by your part wouldn't be so easy to spot.
You are focusing on the false conclusions and wrong methodologies and ignoring the extensive correct conclusions and correct methodologies. That's a rethorical tactic that does not help you, as you didn't invalidate the studies which are correct.
Secondly... you fail to understand what is an estimate.
(cont'd) But I keep forgetting, that you don't do any actual research. You just do that medical stuff thingy. I'd be an idiot to tell you that all medical "stuff" is based on research as I've already pointed out. Not for pointing it out, but for actually thinking, that you'd care.
But hey.... What do the people with higher education than you know about science in general and the field that they study? You know, the people who do actual research in the lab or the field?
Fascinating. Ever heard of "Null hypothesis"? Or you know -- Watched Concordances video on this exact topic? You know; The guy who actually makes research and stuff and night have a clue about it? But you're probably just too stupid to you know... Do some research on the topic and just copy what CMI has to say.
I could be wrong, tho. I'm just basing this hypothesis on a crapload of videos, that you've made, thus shown that you don't have any basic clues about biology.
Not all... I've missed, that he's actually referencing a paper from CMI, and that he's trying to cover it up with proper papers. But he has shown so many times, that he never actually bothered to read the proper papers, and rather "guess" what they say rather than you know... Read them...
I might make an errata or addendum to the videos, since him and Sweetmikser are making me come back to making videos.
an adenda is always nice. But as long as he admits he has to do the same.
One of the cretard tactics is to make you waste time after they present few questions. They won't listen to any of your clarifications, statements of fact, etc...
He makes a video, you debunk it. You adress the points that are wrong. If he disagrees with any of your claims, he must back it up with evidence. Any sort of red herring, you avoid it, that's just they trying to distract you from their failures.
@DoesItAddUp101
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 26;107 Suppl 1:1800-7. Epub 2009 Nov 16.
Evolution in health and medicine Sackler colloquium: Making evolutionary biology a basic science for medicine.
"Premedical students need evolution courses, possibly ones that emphasize medically relevant aspects. In medical school, evolutionary biology should be taught as one of the basic medical sciences."
why don't you make a video about paper's like this?
you idiot.
transtlantic 3 months ago
@DoesItAddUp101
lolol you are so fucked up that it's astonishing... LOLOL
You didn't read the papers thouroughly, if you had the errors of interpretation by your part wouldn't be so easy to spot.
You are focusing on the false conclusions and wrong methodologies and ignoring the extensive correct conclusions and correct methodologies. That's a rethorical tactic that does not help you, as you didn't invalidate the studies which are correct.
Secondly... you fail to understand what is an estimate.
transtlantic 3 months ago
@DoesItAddUp101 "I've thouroughly read all the papers"
Of course you did. As you've clearly shown. Not even getting the title correct doesn't bring you any extra bonus points, you know.
But what do I know? It's not like you've shown incompetence before. Oh, wait. Never mind. You did. So many times, that your credibility is void.
"because your English is so poor"
Aw. You might want to restate that when I'm not fixing your grammatical errors and pointing out that gene != genetic. Ngrish. Wut?
rationalw0lf 3 months ago
@DoesItAddUp101
(cont'd) But I keep forgetting, that you don't do any actual research. You just do that medical stuff thingy. I'd be an idiot to tell you that all medical "stuff" is based on research as I've already pointed out. Not for pointing it out, but for actually thinking, that you'd care.
But hey.... What do the people with higher education than you know about science in general and the field that they study? You know, the people who do actual research in the lab or the field?
rationalw0lf 3 months ago
@DoesItAddUp101
Fascinating. Ever heard of "Null hypothesis"? Or you know -- Watched Concordances video on this exact topic? You know; The guy who actually makes research and stuff and night have a clue about it? But you're probably just too stupid to you know... Do some research on the topic and just copy what CMI has to say.
I could be wrong, tho. I'm just basing this hypothesis on a crapload of videos, that you've made, thus shown that you don't have any basic clues about biology.
rationalw0lf 3 months ago
@DoesItAddUp101
I'm glad that you've decided to show people more of your incompetence. Will you at least READ the paper in full in the next video?
Nah. Who am I kidding? If you can't even read the paper title,. I can't expect the you'd read anything more.
rationalw0lf 3 months ago
@DoesItAddUp101
I don't know which is funnier...the accents...
or the fact that anyone can easily spot your bullshit.
LOLOL
I think rationalw0lf debunked your crap quite well, even if his english is not ideal, he does spot all of your crap and puts it out into the open.
You are not going to debunk human evolution by lying, andy.
transtlantic 3 months ago
@transtlantic
Not all... I've missed, that he's actually referencing a paper from CMI, and that he's trying to cover it up with proper papers. But he has shown so many times, that he never actually bothered to read the proper papers, and rather "guess" what they say rather than you know... Read them...
I might make an errata or addendum to the videos, since him and Sweetmikser are making me come back to making videos.
rationalw0lf 3 months ago
@rationalw0lf
an adenda is always nice. But as long as he admits he has to do the same.
One of the cretard tactics is to make you waste time after they present few questions. They won't listen to any of your clarifications, statements of fact, etc...
He makes a video, you debunk it. You adress the points that are wrong. If he disagrees with any of your claims, he must back it up with evidence. Any sort of red herring, you avoid it, that's just they trying to distract you from their failures.
transtlantic 3 months ago
@transtlantic
But of course. But I have the resources and knowledge to trash his arguments. Soooo...
rationalw0lf 3 months ago