What a loss for mankind that this was not completed! One could say that in his final years, Schoenberg couldn't keep up with new music -- particularly the innovations of Webern -- but I think, innovative or not, this music sounds fresh and young.
Very intriguing. I've never been drawn to late Schoenberg, the Third Quartet struck me a quasi-neo-classical dead end, but this sounds like a new direction. I'm inclined to think that failing to extend tonality microtonally was a fundamental error in responding to the crisis of tonality; Berg and Webern flirted with it slightly. Realistically, it was beyond the performance standards of the time, but Partch, Carrillo, Johnston, et al. will prove to be the influential figures of the next century.
@questions613 Thank you for the suggestion. I just got Malcolm MacDonald’s new revised “ Schoenberg ” from the library – I enjoy his scholarship and viewpoint ( I have all 3 vols. of his Havergal Brian ) and look for ward to reading it ( he covers every work in depth ).
It’s not late period, but I’ve been drawn to Der Jakobsleiter and need to study it more.
i love how this is presented with the manuscript... it feels like you're there when he composed it!
kzoorock 2 months ago
What a loss for mankind that this was not completed! One could say that in his final years, Schoenberg couldn't keep up with new music -- particularly the innovations of Webern -- but I think, innovative or not, this music sounds fresh and young.
LevMysh68 7 months ago
Interesting but not a patch on op.45..Thanks.
C0NTR4B455 8 months ago
although it takes a while to get used to (it is an acquired taste), this musical has a lot of beauty...
alexie28 9 months ago 2
it is dodekafonia? :D
Twardyziom 11 months ago
What a masterful quartet this would have been.
MusicaRicercata 1 year ago 2
This is so interesting. Sounds like he was drawing upon the textures of Webern at times.
BachRocks314 1 year ago
I enjoy it immensely.
johnnynoirman 1 year ago
Thank you very much!
johnstrieder 2 years ago
very tantalizing and i especially like the opening of the first movement which is red hot,unlike that awfully wooden first movement of no.3.
I agree with the post which suggests an exciting change of direction.
japanesesweet 2 years ago
I liked m 3 and 4 the best. Very nice.
frosty956 2 years ago
How lyrical ... lovely.
EMPERORMIKI 2 years ago
Wow, where did you happen to come across this?
madderbass 2 years ago
Very intriguing. I've never been drawn to late Schoenberg, the Third Quartet struck me a quasi-neo-classical dead end, but this sounds like a new direction. I'm inclined to think that failing to extend tonality microtonally was a fundamental error in responding to the crisis of tonality; Berg and Webern flirted with it slightly. Realistically, it was beyond the performance standards of the time, but Partch, Carrillo, Johnston, et al. will prove to be the influential figures of the next century.
Enantiodromialist 2 years ago
Comment removed
flammesombres 2 years ago
@Enantiodromialist check out trio op 45 see if that "draws" you
questions613 1 year ago
@questions613 Thank you for the suggestion. I just got Malcolm MacDonald’s new revised “ Schoenberg ” from the library – I enjoy his scholarship and viewpoint ( I have all 3 vols. of his Havergal Brian ) and look for ward to reading it ( he covers every work in depth ).
It’s not late period, but I’ve been drawn to Der Jakobsleiter and need to study it more.
Enantiodromialist 1 year ago
This is amazing. I didn't know that there were sketches for a 5th, thanks for the upload.
tempodimarcia 2 years ago
Wow...
flammesombres 2 years ago
THAT WAS FUN!
Reminded me of the string trio a little. The late Schönberg revisiting expressionism. Great post!
onclevanja 2 years ago