so....its not a tilt rotor, where the rotor tilts approx 95 degrees, for horizontal and vertical flight.....instead its a "HYBRID TANDEM" rotor.....which means it tilts only 25 degrees......
allrighty then....so....WHY is 25 degrees preferable to 95?!?! seriously just kind of wondering what the concept is here.
I believe they are more concern about how many seconds lost for transformation from heli mode to plane mode. With only 25 degrees angle this aircraft could evade groundfire much faster compared to the original osprey.
@deestilo OK, well that makes sense I guess....but doesn't that just sort of beg the question of why an Osprey couldn't just tilt its rotors 25 degrees instead of 95 in such a situation as this? Even if its not set up to do that, it would seem a pretty minor modification to make the motor that moves the rotors do this.
@frankensteinmoneymac One possibility is the speed of transition from VTOL to forward flight. Another is structural: it's probably much easier to make tilt-wing system with less than 30 degrees of tilt, compared to 90+ degrees, due to the mechanical stresses and tolerances. Finally, efficiency. This system doesn't have to tilt its rotors to make them work for VTOL, but you have to tilt a wing's AOA over 10 degrees to get high lift, high-drag effects.
@superhakujin Eh...I suppose I'll buy that. Your reasoning seems a valid enough explanation. Still this concept seems like an odd thing to me ...although perhaps it's just the aesthetics of a rotor that only tilts 25 degrees that bothers me for some reason.
Note the jet nozzles on the wings. And the tiltWING design. It's neither a tiltwing nor tiltrotor; the rotor seems to be able to tilt independently from the wing. Add in possibly tiltjet and you have two sources of lift and thrust, plus torque control. If it works it would have some amazing manoeuverability.
we alerdy have similar tiltrotors take the MV-22 opsprey for example and btw tilrotors arent that effective they use older outdadted tecnology and they are unpredictable sometimes
trying to steal some ideas off of Sikorsky??? haha.
straighttailpilot 5 months ago
man that's one bad idea.
wellerocks 9 months ago
so....its not a tilt rotor, where the rotor tilts approx 95 degrees, for horizontal and vertical flight.....instead its a "HYBRID TANDEM" rotor.....which means it tilts only 25 degrees......
allrighty then....so....WHY is 25 degrees preferable to 95?!?! seriously just kind of wondering what the concept is here.
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
@frankensteinmoneymac
I believe they are more concern about how many seconds lost for transformation from heli mode to plane mode. With only 25 degrees angle this aircraft could evade groundfire much faster compared to the original osprey.
deestilo 1 year ago
@deestilo OK, well that makes sense I guess....but doesn't that just sort of beg the question of why an Osprey couldn't just tilt its rotors 25 degrees instead of 95 in such a situation as this? Even if its not set up to do that, it would seem a pretty minor modification to make the motor that moves the rotors do this.
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
@frankensteinmoneymac One possibility is the speed of transition from VTOL to forward flight. Another is structural: it's probably much easier to make tilt-wing system with less than 30 degrees of tilt, compared to 90+ degrees, due to the mechanical stresses and tolerances. Finally, efficiency. This system doesn't have to tilt its rotors to make them work for VTOL, but you have to tilt a wing's AOA over 10 degrees to get high lift, high-drag effects.
superhakujin 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
frankensteinmoneymac 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@superhakujin Eh...I suppose I'll buy that. Your reasoning seems a valid enough explanation. Still this concept seems like an odd thing to me ...although perhaps it's just the aesthetics of a rotor that only tilts 25 degrees that bothers me for some reason.
frankensteinmoneymac 2 weeks ago
unstead of tilting rotars, it has an independant swashplate system for eatch blade, right?
dodgedart74 2 years ago
Now this is almost a direct copy of a soviet concept.
shaftster2001 2 years ago
Ha!
So this is where James Cameron stole his Avatar helicopter idea from.
3A7C 2 years ago
@3A7C not exacly, it come more from a real Osprey. Check this out;)
mbrdej 1 year ago
@3A7C
Halo!
sniper77shot 1 year ago
Note the jet nozzles on the wings. And the tiltWING design. It's neither a tiltwing nor tiltrotor; the rotor seems to be able to tilt independently from the wing. Add in possibly tiltjet and you have two sources of lift and thrust, plus torque control. If it works it would have some amazing manoeuverability.
choralbird 2 years ago
What's wrong with the Osprey now? It's an utter flying death trap, yeah, but will a fancy schmancy cabin and less powerfull engines fix it?
peepeevagi 2 years ago
Have you also take some shots of the AH-6S Phoenix mockup at the convention?
MrDrumpy 2 years ago
we alerdy have similar tiltrotors take the MV-22 opsprey for example and btw tilrotors arent that effective they use older outdadted tecnology and they are unpredictable sometimes
Cozzi0 2 years ago
You're both wrong...
NH90 FTW!! :D haha
Cool helo concept, tooo bad it won't likely leave the drawing board...the coolest ones never do
BTR74 2 years ago
sikorsky "uh 60 black hawk" is the best helicopter in the world ! ...is the only ...is the king !
v3nuclear 2 years ago
BAH! LIES
Iroquois "UH-1 huey" is the best helicopter in the world ! ...is the only ...is the king !
odst121 2 years ago 2