@m4ssee The computer (Sorry, I don't have much knowledge about this) starts caculations from 0. Everything technically starts from 0. The code written for it, is 0 and 1. All 0's and 1's. We've been TAUGHT to start from 1. Computers see them from 0. Nothing, is no number.
Correct me if I'm wrong. Most things 'computer' related are usually labeled this way.
All I can say about AMD processors: Two of my friends bought the AMD 6 core processors (forget the model), and every time they went to run ANY 3D application, let it be Max, Blender, Call of Duty or any similar program which uses either Directx or OpenGL, it would hardware fault or bluescreen for them. Anyone have a brilliant solution for that? I think not.
@inutichow i would prefer my hardware to render 3D applications without hardware faults though. I do agree that it costs more, and for certain things, AMD is better, however, Intel is probably a bit better overall. (price aside) it all depends on what you are planning on using the PC for.
Hi, I have the Intel Core i7-990x Extreme Edition, with Motherboard Gigabyte G1.Assassin, Case Cooler Master HAF X 942, and Nvidia GTX 590, and its really fast and powerfull. I am very happy.
Hi, I have the Intel Core i7-990x Extreme Edition, with Motherboard Gigabyte G1.Assassin, Case Cooler Master HAF X 942, and Nvidia GTX 590, and its really fast and powerfull. I am very happy.
until now I haven't been a fan of AMD (actually I hated it) But when the Bulldozer series are out... that's going to dominate completly anything under 500$ intel throw at them while costing around 300$.
this joe guy's been watching too many 1990s AMD-vs-Intel heatsink removal videos. He sees one first-gen athlon cpu fry because its heatsink's been removed and automatically thinks every single amd chip does it. the video was biased; the pentiums the athlons were being compared to were newer models--namely the first ones to have the anti-fry safety features. Pick the pentium models before it and the athlon 2's after it, and the story'd be in reverse.
We all need to remember that Intel is the one that creates the technology; AMD had to copy Intel in order to even stay in the market back in the 80s... Wasn't even until the late 90s that the stupid contract between AMD and Intel finally severed. AMD is the one who is always second in line trying to be better. Sorta like NVIDIA and ATI for the longest time. AMD and ATI are the same company now, and they still suck.
@1000miles2paradise Now I do have a i5 and I can't argue about what u said about cpus.. But saying that the company who delivered a dx 11 card 6 months before Nvidia is copying them and they are not as good... that is complete bullshit not to say that ATI started making Video cards 8 years before Nvidia was founded. but to prefer a i5 at the price of 400$ when you could get a 8 core beast for only 350$ is completly foolish.
@terorvlad I bought an AMD/ATI system (and, by the way, I don't skimp on the systems...) last February. The same system purchased the year prior with older Intel and nvidia hardware benchmarks higher on 3DMark11. Worst purchase I ever made. I'll spend the extra money and stick with a brand that has proven itself to me...
@jaydotosh If you run the CPU without fan and it doesn't burn it just proves it has higher quality components, there's no ignorance to laugh about, or it's you trying to put the conversation like this, that way you feel superior? I'm not ignorant, I just don't like AMD, they sell a lot just cause people can't afford Intel, so they go for AMD and then throw shit at Nvidia just because they're jealous.. but hey I don't want to argue, time will help everyone figure things out.. bye
@ooBounceDKoo Really? Try to remove the fan to your AMD processor, it won't last, INTEL WILL. Try to compare your "AMD" 6 core processor, to my intel i5, MINE IS FASTER. Test your processor and you'll be able to see that 4 cores of Intel's processors are faster than 9 AMDs. All I'm paying is Intel ads? I think all I'm paying is: Fast processing units, highly overclockable, low power consumption and really reliable chips. Talking shit about Intel without even getting your facts straight, SHAME
Well yea, AMDs might burn out if you take the heat sink off but i've senn a vid on here were that test was run and not all of the intel chips survived, besides in what way does that lead to them being better? I've had plenty of intel and AMD chips, and i'll always buy AMD over intel as to get a same spec chip from intel it costs 4 times as much and just isnt viable.
@jaydotosh Bulldozer will be 50% faster than the i7 950, which means it still won't beat the 990x even though it's going to be 8 cores, also this is the first time they're going on 32nm manufacture, you say "wait till Bulldozer", took 1 year for AMD to get to where intel was 2 years ago? I say wait till intel comes out with their new stuff.. I'm not a fan of any, but I'd rather save up money and go for intel, no matter what
@JoesPlaying I'm not a fan of either, but I absolutely detest intel's marketing aims, as it is monopolising (yes, I'm in England) its target market. Look at nVidia: they have licensed SLi technology on AMD chipsets; this means that nVidia knows somehting good about Bulldozer that we don't. You have ot consider the possibilites: AMD could be talking about its entry-level Bulldozer model (meaning that, if the goods are released soon, we can truly find out was hiding behind the curtains)
@JoesPlaying COMMENT CONTINUED: there could be and even more powerful model of the Bulldozer processor. You never can be too sure. One minute you're (not you lol, I'm just saying) bragging about 'INTEL RULES' and the next week AMD releases its processors which make Intel's 990x look like a i386 compared to a Athlon X2!! I personally am planning on a new gaming rig build, so I'm not too sure what to get; I was going to buy a 990x (WAAAY too expensive), then thought of getting a Phenom II X6 1100T
@jaydotosh No I don't go "INTEL RULES" and then next week I'm all crazy about AMD, and you know why? Because doesn't matter what, Intel will always come back faster, yes, pricey, but will always be first at having the crazy technologies, took AMD 1 year to get where intel was 1 year and a half ago, all I'm saying is: if you're restricted on money, either get a good Intel chip and overclock it, or just go for an AMD.. but Intel will perform better no matter what.. trust me
@JoesPlaying lol you are such an Intel fanboy. No one can predict the future. in 2 years time you're just gonna say AMD is the best; exactly what you said to me about Intel. Money is no restriction for me, but I simply do not like Intel for the simple reason that they keep releasing new sockets and EOL'ing old motherboards. How are you so sure Intel is always going to be faster? Past statistics? Look at the future. AMD has made a processor for a supercomputer thats equal to 12,571 C2D processors
@jaydotosh I'm not a fanboy but my i3 550 2core happens to be only 10% slower than the AMD 6 cores, I'm not a fan of either, I just say the truth, just like I would say Nvidia owns AMD, everyone who has enough money to go for Intel will never regret it, soon or later with AMD everyone will start complaining, AMD sells and sells just because people think it's cheap and good lol, Intel will always last longer, longer longer loooooonger than AMD
@JoesPlaying that is just BULLSHIT. the i3 is definately not 10% slower that the X6. If it were, then why in the holy name of fuck would AMD market its hex-core processor in the high-end section of the market? You are comparin 3 threads to 6 threads? you should consider these things before conjuring up bullshit. I have nothing against you, its only the fact the you are so badly mal-informed. I had a GTX 560, and it failed on me 3 times. Had a 9400GT and it failed me twice. I am sick of nVidia.
@JoesPlaying I now see why you favour nVidia and Intel so much; with your i5 computer and nVidia graphics. Back in 2000 I had a Intel; I have to say it was awesome at the time, but then I got an AMD Duron and it just kicked ass. This time, I'm goin' nVidia and AMD. Maybe ATi in the future (highly likely).
@jaydotosh lol Chill.. in 90% games my i3 is even better than that 6 core crap, dude, I don't want to argue neither am I badly informed, I own both AMD & Intel/NVIDIA hardware, the price of AMD'S actual best cpu is 200€, the price of my i3 is 140€, and it's almost as good, by the way my i3 has 4 threads not 3, and 4 intel threads are better than 6 AMD, and that's fact, have a nice day
@JoesPlaying lol sorry I lost my cool than.. got a bit carried away. I don't know much about lower-end Intel products (like the core i3) but in the link I sent you, the i3 wasn't even compared to the x6, and in some tests iactually beat the core i7. I think you may have doen something wrong in the test comparison you did between the processors. there is no way the i3 can be compared to th x6. That's just plain stupid. The i3 is still a dual core though. But I guess its great value for money in
@jaydotosh Bud I said "in many games" it outperforms the x6, not in benchmarks.. but yeah i'll have to take a look at the Bulldozer, or get the 8 cores just to say "yeah 8 core bitches" lol
@JoesPlaying nah the benchmarks were 'many games'. like I said in the past, I'm not an AMD fanboy, I even said I was gonna get a 990x or a i7 2600K. I don't go around YouTube to say that 'My i5 is faster than a AMD X6' and that 'Try to remove the fan to your AMD processor, it won't last, INTEL WILL' nor do I boast about '4 cores of Intel's processors are faster than 9 AMDs'. You've just proved to me that you're an Intel fanboy; 'all I'm paying is: Fast processing units and really reliable chips'
@JoesPlaying and, like you said, 'Talking shit about Intel without even getting your facts straight, SHAME'
well I say, 'Talking shit about AMD without even getting your facts straight, Shame'. The information that you're pouring out of your mouth is as useful as a bowl of pubes. So please, stop being a hypocrit okay?
@jaydotosh lol you need to chill man, Intel will always overclass AMD, the only reason I would take a look to AMD's shit is because then I can laugh my ass off when Intel replies back.. also yes, Intel will 80% times last without the fan, AMD will never last, which tells us that Intel uses higher quality components, also yes, 4 Intel cores are faster than 9 AMDs.. and that's fact.. also that comment where I stated those things, was a reply to a guy insulting Intel, so I turned him off. Byebye
@JoesPlaying so... you ARE an Intel fanboy. I don't need to 'chill' i'm chill already. Your ignorance makes me laugh at you. I don't know where the hell you getting all this information from, but one thing is true: you say that intel "has always overclassed AMD", well I can say that its bullshit; I remember back in 2000 - 2005 gamers always chose AMD. Why you ask? Because Intel was shit. Plain and simple.
@JoesPlaying Off the record, I'm buying a Core i7 2600k and dual GTX 580s, I chose the i7 because it drew 20w less power; they are so similar. I would say there's no difference between them. I doubt you've been up-tp-date lately, but I've been researching this shit since I learned to take a crap when I was a child. By the way, what douchebag cunt-ass penismuncher would run a CPU without a fan? Who gives a fuck if a processor runs without a fan?
@jaydotosh If you run the CPU without fan and it doesn't burn it just proves it has higher quality components, there's no ignorance to laugh about, or it's you trying to put the conversation like this, that way you feel superior? I'm not ignorant, I just don't like AMD, they sell a lot just cause people can't afford Intel, so they go for AMD and then throw shit at Nvidia just because they're jealous.. but hey I don't want to argue, time will help everyone figure things out.. bye
@JoesPlaying REPLY CONTINUED #2 then I though of getting a Core i7 2600k.... its very hard to make a decision you're gonna stick to. At the moment, I'm not gonna buy anything, just wait for Bulldozer and Ivy Bridge then make my pick.
@JoesPlaying Intel i7 $1000, AMD Phenom II X6 $200 hmm i don't care if intel is faster i can buy 5 amd CPU'S for one i7 just to expensive man. plus Bulldozer CPu's kill i7's and yes i have a friend who works for amd so i know :p
@shalom1181 yeah 'cause bulldozers are new and i7 are 1 year old? LOL, wait for intel's ivy bridge and then cry on your bulldozer, intel has already prooven they have STABLE 22nm chips, amd? FUCK ME
@JoesPlaying You are WAY behind on the times... Ever since either the Athlon 64 or the original Phenom AMD, too, can throttle back due to thermals. It is not a good idea, naturally, but it can be done.
You are right on the rest though, Intel has a commanding lead - we should ALL hope that that lead narrows rather than broadens, however, as only a competitive AMD can keep prices at bay.
That said, I'll be sticking with AMD in most system builds, still better perf/$ on the low-mid end.
Quite frankly, when it comes to virtualization and VDI, I can see a huge difference in performance... especially when considering performance to price ratio.
@Meowmiks lol not true, considerind 2 years old beat the so claimed "bulldozer" everyone was trashing intel because of bulldozer and now that it's out, 1-2 years old intel cpu beat it.. lol that's just sad
@gusnhde93 yeah just like an i3 performs better than bulldozer in most games.. lol.. and since you started your statement with an insult I won't even bother replying again
@Mr2pacLegend Imagine that each member of your family giving you a list of tasks to complete almost simultaneously. 4 threads is the equivalent of 4 family members. Now imagine that you could delegate one list of tasks per friend, now because they are working in an confined space all of you friends can only work at a certain efficiency, but imagine that you had 4 friends, but 2 task-lists, without turbo-boost the two non-working friends would hinder the performance of the ones who do work.
Intel turbo boost program works like shit on a HP Pavilion dv7-4195ed with a integrated soundcard! Delete the whole Intel/MSI Turbo tool, and your laptop works great, and have a beautiful sound.
I don't really care what processor is inside the computer I buy. AMD or Intel. I care more about the graphicscard since I play games, not making stuff in photoshop and such...
@maorizio1 It's definitly not! Anyone will tell you the GPU is much more important then the CPU when it comes to graphics, ask around first, talk later, dumb shit...
@nofreedomofspeech Really? so maybe everyone will buy a PC that cost 400$ and the best GPU in the market? It's better for you to STFU because when it comes to PC games every hardware is important, even the speed of your RAM, dumb shit.
@maorizio1 Not to... umm... "ruin" your argument, but RAM frequency is actually extremely dependent from gaming given there is enough memory to hold the entire game on... the only exception, say, would be trying to run a game that requires 3.5gbs of RAM using only 2gbs installed. Then, obviously, the frequencies would actually be used transferring constant data to and from the RAM. Just making that clear, cheers mate.
I love Intel, I personally have a Core i3 370M with just HT and it blows my old C2D away. I have ran 4 YouTube videos at once on my laptop and had no slowdown and wasn't even using half of the systems resources. Amazing!!
Sooo, they produce (for ex.) a 3,2GHz i7 CPU and they set/sell it as a 2,66GHz CPU, trying to convince the costumer that every time the CPU passes 2,66GHz is due to some new awesome feature called turbo boost?
@Th3KiD88 no, is more like the opposite. Intel sells you a 2.66GHz Cpu and when you are not using it fully, Intel overclocks the cpu for you, except for that Intel can adjust which cores are being overclocked and which one should be shut off to keep the energy under control. It more like power management/ overclocking rather than selling a 3.2GHz CPU at 2.66GHz
@ilovebreadcrumbs yes. but not enthusiast overclocking. on the details page such as on newegg they list the specs on a processor and it has regular frequency and turbo mode frequency. the turbo mode is usually .2 higher, such as my I7 930 stock at 2.8, turbo mode 3.06.
@Fatalsh0ts ummm why do people spend money on nice cars or hot tubs or big screen tv's if they dont need it you wanna know why bud money aint a problem
Yes but can it handle me playing solitaire and checking my e-mail at t he same time?
lander77477 1 day ago
is it just me or is he using ibm's from like 6 years ago
sssmeee 2 days ago
Does it mean that a single-threaded program like Phun run faster than on the older chips?
jishan22 2 weeks ago
will the Turbo Boost get me to school on time when I'm running late?
SlackintoshHD 1 month ago
wtf some vids say have 6 cores and this video i7 have only 4 cores that stupid
xITheLegendsIx 1 month ago
@xITheLegendsIx those 4 cores have 8 threads at $300 and a hexcore is like a $700 processor with 12 threads. not very stupid. just difference prices.
SlackintoshHD 1 month ago
Nice Video Man..
fahimhassan100 1 month ago
ACER ASPIRE 5315 8616 RUSSIAN TUSHI MOSCOW LEONOR WATLING
whotaughtyou 2 months ago
► 0:38► 0:38
Samantha Janus Up_N_Under
whotaughtyou 2 months ago
the turbo mode ...
If you see .. u have 3.00GHz at normal .. if u in turbo mode .. it will be 3.60GHz or 4.00GHz
PCSX1000 2 months ago
my Desktop computer has a 2.8 GHz 6 Core AMD Processor
my Laptop computer has a 2.5 GHz 2 Core Intel Processor
im a dual-core traitor xD
Hamzawax 2 months ago
I can feel a huge amount of "zeal virus" here...
arospades 3 months ago
wow, you guys get really pissed over something meager like computer processors.
deathskull77 3 months ago
they just put some more power/voltage on the processor at certain tasks and now they called it "turbo" that shows how stupid poeple can be+
aoxilus 4 months ago
Ugh, why is there a 0-core and no 4-core? -.-
m4ssee 4 months ago
@m4ssee The first core is the 0 core. Get used to it.
mymiuchiz 4 months ago
@mymiuchiz
Yes but why 0 instead of 4?
m4ssee 4 months ago 8
@m4ssee The computer (Sorry, I don't have much knowledge about this) starts caculations from 0. Everything technically starts from 0. The code written for it, is 0 and 1. All 0's and 1's. We've been TAUGHT to start from 1. Computers see them from 0. Nothing, is no number.
Correct me if I'm wrong. Most things 'computer' related are usually labeled this way.
PhysicsTowerTeam 3 months ago
@PhysicsTowerTeam
Oh, I undestand it now. Its like that binary shit..
m4ssee 3 months ago
@m4ssee Sure :)
It's pretty amazing that our lives currently rely on 0's and 1's. Without them, the whole world today, would fail.
PhysicsTowerTeam 3 months ago
@m4ssee it is weird, but let's talk like intelligent beings... "0" is a number too xD
BIOSHOCKFOXX 3 weeks ago
All I can say about AMD processors: Two of my friends bought the AMD 6 core processors (forget the model), and every time they went to run ANY 3D application, let it be Max, Blender, Call of Duty or any similar program which uses either Directx or OpenGL, it would hardware fault or bluescreen for them. Anyone have a brilliant solution for that? I think not.
x8cariboulou 4 months ago
@x8cariboulou Yes, but you also pay an Arm and a Leg for something a little bit better.
inutichow 4 months ago
@inutichow i would prefer my hardware to render 3D applications without hardware faults though. I do agree that it costs more, and for certain things, AMD is better, however, Intel is probably a bit better overall. (price aside) it all depends on what you are planning on using the PC for.
x8cariboulou 4 months ago
Two questions:
1) Do you have to press a button to turbo-boost your Intel Cores?
2) Won't your laptop overheat much faster when you're turboboosting the cores?
Thanks in advance!
Hereson0 4 months ago
I have a i7 950 , does it have this boost thing? :o
CrASYmUZIk 5 months ago
@CrASYmUZIk of course mate :)
thekyriakos 4 months ago
@CrASYmUZIk yes
TheDougtechcrew 4 months ago
@TheDougtechcrew yeah , i found out already , checked in my bios: enabled
CrASYmUZIk 4 months ago
And I thaught I was smart
DEKARONGAMER97 5 months ago
i...dont...understand...anything
BaltoMovie 5 months ago
IS IT SAFE TO TURBO BOOST ???
zawette 5 months ago
@zawette
only with kitt 2000!
obaidCarkey 4 months ago
aaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Nerdgasme..........
JacobVangChristensen 5 months ago
Phenom II X6
MrComputerWisdom 5 months ago
I get the feeling that this guy is pretty smart
o0napalm0o 5 months ago
New technology? My 486 had an awesome Turbo button which overclocked the CPU to a stunning 50 Mhz!
cumulus0007 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi, I have the Intel Core i7-990x Extreme Edition, with Motherboard Gigabyte G1.Assassin, Case Cooler Master HAF X 942, and Nvidia GTX 590, and its really fast and powerfull. I am very happy.
Greetings from AREQUIPA (PERÚ).
You can see in:
watch?v=4FiTgxpopZ8
perupresente 6 months ago
Hi, I have the Intel Core i7-990x Extreme Edition, with Motherboard Gigabyte G1.Assassin, Case Cooler Master HAF X 942, and Nvidia GTX 590, and its really fast and powerfull. I am very happy.
Greetings from AREQUIPA (PERÚ).
You can see in:
watch?v=4FiTgxpopZ8
perupresente 6 months ago
@perupresente holy f*** i thought mine was powerful
brando12003 6 months ago
until now I haven't been a fan of AMD (actually I hated it) But when the Bulldozer series are out... that's going to dominate completly anything under 500$ intel throw at them while costing around 300$.
terorvlad 7 months ago
Comment removed
MrGaZZaDaG 7 months ago
AMDS works better, it doesnt kill the other cores... it just lowest them to boost up half the cores... not just 1 CORE
AMD WINS
MrGaZZaDaG 7 months ago
Comment removed
MrGaZZaDaG 7 months ago
its i5
z0mger999 7 months ago
lol the intel AMD fanboi wars never end.
this joe guy's been watching too many 1990s AMD-vs-Intel heatsink removal videos. He sees one first-gen athlon cpu fry because its heatsink's been removed and automatically thinks every single amd chip does it. the video was biased; the pentiums the athlons were being compared to were newer models--namely the first ones to have the anti-fry safety features. Pick the pentium models before it and the athlon 2's after it, and the story'd be in reverse.
BrEnNo1023 7 months ago
We all need to remember that Intel is the one that creates the technology; AMD had to copy Intel in order to even stay in the market back in the 80s... Wasn't even until the late 90s that the stupid contract between AMD and Intel finally severed. AMD is the one who is always second in line trying to be better. Sorta like NVIDIA and ATI for the longest time. AMD and ATI are the same company now, and they still suck.
1000miles2paradise 7 months ago
@1000miles2paradise Now I do have a i5 and I can't argue about what u said about cpus.. But saying that the company who delivered a dx 11 card 6 months before Nvidia is copying them and they are not as good... that is complete bullshit not to say that ATI started making Video cards 8 years before Nvidia was founded. but to prefer a i5 at the price of 400$ when you could get a 8 core beast for only 350$ is completly foolish.
terorvlad 7 months ago
@terorvlad I bought an AMD/ATI system (and, by the way, I don't skimp on the systems...) last February. The same system purchased the year prior with older Intel and nvidia hardware benchmarks higher on 3DMark11. Worst purchase I ever made. I'll spend the extra money and stick with a brand that has proven itself to me...
1000miles2paradise 7 months ago
Intel blows balls amd ftw
The91489 7 months ago
can i play farmville in it?????
i think 4 cores will not handle farmville....
XD LOL....
dote21 7 months ago 43
@dote21 I am sorry but you can't play farmville, buuuut pacman will run fine. :p
BlackOni001 3 months ago
@dote21 haha
PCSX1000 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jaydotosh If you run the CPU without fan and it doesn't burn it just proves it has higher quality components, there's no ignorance to laugh about, or it's you trying to put the conversation like this, that way you feel superior? I'm not ignorant, I just don't like AMD, they sell a lot just cause people can't afford Intel, so they go for AMD and then throw shit at Nvidia just because they're jealous.. but hey I don't want to argue, time will help everyone figure things out.. bye
JoesPlaying 8 months ago
The only reason that people still buying AMD processors cuz they are out of money (me too :( ) Intel FTW.
cpdaviddee 8 months ago
and this works automatically whith my 2600k?
lepthymo 8 months ago
This guy gets all the hot chicks, so stop frontin'
bluenotejazz 8 months ago
@SAButterbrot hahahha..... whopping 66Mhz. that's seriously fast
lnitialDrift 8 months ago
AMD has Turbo Core and costs much less. All you guys are paying for is Intel ads.
ooBounceDKoo 8 months ago
@ooBounceDKoo Really? Try to remove the fan to your AMD processor, it won't last, INTEL WILL. Try to compare your "AMD" 6 core processor, to my intel i5, MINE IS FASTER. Test your processor and you'll be able to see that 4 cores of Intel's processors are faster than 9 AMDs. All I'm paying is Intel ads? I think all I'm paying is: Fast processing units, highly overclockable, low power consumption and really reliable chips. Talking shit about Intel without even getting your facts straight, SHAME
JoesPlaying 8 months ago 31
@JoesPlaying
Well yea, AMDs might burn out if you take the heat sink off but i've senn a vid on here were that test was run and not all of the intel chips survived, besides in what way does that lead to them being better? I've had plenty of intel and AMD chips, and i'll always buy AMD over intel as to get a same spec chip from intel it costs 4 times as much and just isnt viable.
I0ITuGI0I 8 months ago
@JoesPlaying wait till Bulldozer is here...
jaydotosh 8 months ago
@jaydotosh Bulldozer will be 50% faster than the i7 950, which means it still won't beat the 990x even though it's going to be 8 cores, also this is the first time they're going on 32nm manufacture, you say "wait till Bulldozer", took 1 year for AMD to get to where intel was 2 years ago? I say wait till intel comes out with their new stuff.. I'm not a fan of any, but I'd rather save up money and go for intel, no matter what
JoesPlaying 8 months ago
@JoesPlaying I'm not a fan of either, but I absolutely detest intel's marketing aims, as it is monopolising (yes, I'm in England) its target market. Look at nVidia: they have licensed SLi technology on AMD chipsets; this means that nVidia knows somehting good about Bulldozer that we don't. You have ot consider the possibilites: AMD could be talking about its entry-level Bulldozer model (meaning that, if the goods are released soon, we can truly find out was hiding behind the curtains)
jaydotosh 8 months ago
@JoesPlaying COMMENT CONTINUED: there could be and even more powerful model of the Bulldozer processor. You never can be too sure. One minute you're (not you lol, I'm just saying) bragging about 'INTEL RULES' and the next week AMD releases its processors which make Intel's 990x look like a i386 compared to a Athlon X2!! I personally am planning on a new gaming rig build, so I'm not too sure what to get; I was going to buy a 990x (WAAAY too expensive), then thought of getting a Phenom II X6 1100T
jaydotosh 8 months ago
@jaydotosh No I don't go "INTEL RULES" and then next week I'm all crazy about AMD, and you know why? Because doesn't matter what, Intel will always come back faster, yes, pricey, but will always be first at having the crazy technologies, took AMD 1 year to get where intel was 1 year and a half ago, all I'm saying is: if you're restricted on money, either get a good Intel chip and overclock it, or just go for an AMD.. but Intel will perform better no matter what.. trust me
JoesPlaying 8 months ago
@JoesPlaying lol you are such an Intel fanboy. No one can predict the future. in 2 years time you're just gonna say AMD is the best; exactly what you said to me about Intel. Money is no restriction for me, but I simply do not like Intel for the simple reason that they keep releasing new sockets and EOL'ing old motherboards. How are you so sure Intel is always going to be faster? Past statistics? Look at the future. AMD has made a processor for a supercomputer thats equal to 12,571 C2D processors
jaydotosh 8 months ago
@jaydotosh I'm not a fanboy but my i3 550 2core happens to be only 10% slower than the AMD 6 cores, I'm not a fan of either, I just say the truth, just like I would say Nvidia owns AMD, everyone who has enough money to go for Intel will never regret it, soon or later with AMD everyone will start complaining, AMD sells and sells just because people think it's cheap and good lol, Intel will always last longer, longer longer loooooonger than AMD
JoesPlaying 8 months ago
@JoesPlaying that is just BULLSHIT. the i3 is definately not 10% slower that the X6. If it were, then why in the holy name of fuck would AMD market its hex-core processor in the high-end section of the market? You are comparin 3 threads to 6 threads? you should consider these things before conjuring up bullshit. I have nothing against you, its only the fact the you are so badly mal-informed. I had a GTX 560, and it failed on me 3 times. Had a 9400GT and it failed me twice. I am sick of nVidia.
jaydotosh 8 months ago
@JoesPlaying AMD is better than both. You should read up about the Intel monopoly, and how AMD created a lawsuit against Intel back in June 2005.
jaydotosh 8 months ago
@JoesPlaying I now see why you favour nVidia and Intel so much; with your i5 computer and nVidia graphics. Back in 2000 I had a Intel; I have to say it was awesome at the time, but then I got an AMD Duron and it just kicked ass. This time, I'm goin' nVidia and AMD. Maybe ATi in the future (highly likely).
jaydotosh 8 months ago
@jaydotosh lol Chill.. in 90% games my i3 is even better than that 6 core crap, dude, I don't want to argue neither am I badly informed, I own both AMD & Intel/NVIDIA hardware, the price of AMD'S actual best cpu is 200€, the price of my i3 is 140€, and it's almost as good, by the way my i3 has 4 threads not 3, and 4 intel threads are better than 6 AMD, and that's fact, have a nice day
JoesPlaying 8 months ago
@JoesPlaying lol sorry I lost my cool than.. got a bit carried away. I don't know much about lower-end Intel products (like the core i3) but in the link I sent you, the i3 wasn't even compared to the x6, and in some tests iactually beat the core i7. I think you may have doen something wrong in the test comparison you did between the processors. there is no way the i3 can be compared to th x6. That's just plain stupid. The i3 is still a dual core though. But I guess its great value for money in
jaydotosh 8 months ago
@jaydotosh Bud I said "in many games" it outperforms the x6, not in benchmarks.. but yeah i'll have to take a look at the Bulldozer, or get the 8 cores just to say "yeah 8 core bitches" lol
JoesPlaying 8 months ago
@JoesPlaying nah the benchmarks were 'many games'. like I said in the past, I'm not an AMD fanboy, I even said I was gonna get a 990x or a i7 2600K. I don't go around YouTube to say that 'My i5 is faster than a AMD X6' and that 'Try to remove the fan to your AMD processor, it won't last, INTEL WILL' nor do I boast about '4 cores of Intel's processors are faster than 9 AMDs'. You've just proved to me that you're an Intel fanboy; 'all I'm paying is: Fast processing units and really reliable chips'
jaydotosh 8 months ago
@JoesPlaying and, like you said, 'Talking shit about Intel without even getting your facts straight, SHAME'
well I say, 'Talking shit about AMD without even getting your facts straight, Shame'. The information that you're pouring out of your mouth is as useful as a bowl of pubes. So please, stop being a hypocrit okay?
jaydotosh 8 months ago
@JoesPlaying #continued# budget systems I guess.
jaydotosh 8 months ago
@JoesPlaying oh yeah, I forgot... 'hava a nice day' -.-
jaydotosh 8 months ago
@jaydotosh lol you need to chill man, Intel will always overclass AMD, the only reason I would take a look to AMD's shit is because then I can laugh my ass off when Intel replies back.. also yes, Intel will 80% times last without the fan, AMD will never last, which tells us that Intel uses higher quality components, also yes, 4 Intel cores are faster than 9 AMDs.. and that's fact.. also that comment where I stated those things, was a reply to a guy insulting Intel, so I turned him off. Byebye
JoesPlaying 8 months ago
@JoesPlaying so... you ARE an Intel fanboy. I don't need to 'chill' i'm chill already. Your ignorance makes me laugh at you. I don't know where the hell you getting all this information from, but one thing is true: you say that intel "has always overclassed AMD", well I can say that its bullshit; I remember back in 2000 - 2005 gamers always chose AMD. Why you ask? Because Intel was shit. Plain and simple.
jaydotosh 8 months ago
@JoesPlaying Off the record, I'm buying a Core i7 2600k and dual GTX 580s, I chose the i7 because it drew 20w less power; they are so similar. I would say there's no difference between them. I doubt you've been up-tp-date lately, but I've been researching this shit since I learned to take a crap when I was a child. By the way, what douchebag cunt-ass penismuncher would run a CPU without a fan? Who gives a fuck if a processor runs without a fan?
jaydotosh 8 months ago
@jaydotosh If you run the CPU without fan and it doesn't burn it just proves it has higher quality components, there's no ignorance to laugh about, or it's you trying to put the conversation like this, that way you feel superior? I'm not ignorant, I just don't like AMD, they sell a lot just cause people can't afford Intel, so they go for AMD and then throw shit at Nvidia just because they're jealous.. but hey I don't want to argue, time will help everyone figure things out.. bye
JoesPlaying 8 months ago
Intel if you're reading this...... FUCK YOU GIVE ME MY MONEY BACK.
jaydotosh 8 months ago
@JoesPlaying REPLY CONTINUED #2 then I though of getting a Core i7 2600k.... its very hard to make a decision you're gonna stick to. At the moment, I'm not gonna buy anything, just wait for Bulldozer and Ivy Bridge then make my pick.
jaydotosh 8 months ago
@JoesPlaying /watch?v=D-GZbrO5N-M
Phenom II X6 is more powerful than i5... watch the benchmarks in this video if you don't believe me.
jaydotosh 8 months ago
@JoesPlaying Intel i7 $1000, AMD Phenom II X6 $200 hmm i don't care if intel is faster i can buy 5 amd CPU'S for one i7 just to expensive man. plus Bulldozer CPu's kill i7's and yes i have a friend who works for amd so i know :p
shalom1181 6 months ago
@shalom1181 yeah 'cause bulldozers are new and i7 are 1 year old? LOL, wait for intel's ivy bridge and then cry on your bulldozer, intel has already prooven they have STABLE 22nm chips, amd? FUCK ME
JoesPlaying 6 months ago
@JoesPlaying i'd have thumbed up ur comment 50 million times if i could :)
balagehun1991 5 months ago
@balagehun1991 LOL
JoesPlaying 5 months ago
@JoesPlaying Who would want to take off the cooler from the processor while it's on!?
Caio569 5 months ago
@JoesPlaying u r totally true man, +1 there
balagehun1991 5 months ago
@JoesPlaying So? My AMD triple core runs anything maxxed...do I even care what CPU is better? Nah! MY CPU IS TEH BEST ! Never let me down!
MihailGeorgescu 5 months ago
@MihailGeorgescu Lol whatever you say
JoesPlaying 5 months ago
@JoesPlaying the new amd and intel processors have overheat protection ,i guess u saw the old toms hardware video :P .BTW do u have an i5 sandy :)
vasumamayo 4 months ago
@vasumamayo I swaped to i3 560 and OC'd it to 4.4GHz..
JoesPlaying 4 months ago
@JoesPlaying You are WAY behind on the times... Ever since either the Athlon 64 or the original Phenom AMD, too, can throttle back due to thermals. It is not a good idea, naturally, but it can be done.
You are right on the rest though, Intel has a commanding lead - we should ALL hope that that lead narrows rather than broadens, however, as only a competitive AMD can keep prices at bay.
That said, I'll be sticking with AMD in most system builds, still better perf/$ on the low-mid end.
looncraz 4 months ago
@JoesPlaying I'm still an AMD fan :\
Quite frankly, when it comes to virtualization and VDI, I can see a huge difference in performance... especially when considering performance to price ratio.
Meowmiks 3 months ago
@Meowmiks lol not true, considerind 2 years old beat the so claimed "bulldozer" everyone was trashing intel because of bulldozer and now that it's out, 1-2 years old intel cpu beat it.. lol that's just sad
JoesPlaying 3 months ago
@JoesPlaying I'm talking about Opterons... not bulldozer. You know... stuff that actually matters as opposed to how many FPS one gets in Crysis.
Meowmiks 3 months ago
@Meowmiks lol.. both suck, amd is not worth shiit, there's a reason if it's 5 times cheaper than intel
JoesPlaying 3 months ago
@JoesPlaying Somehow I doubt you've even used an opteron, let alone setup a server for VDI deployments.
Meowmiks 3 months ago
@JoesPlaying hey douchebag... any phenom II x6 performs better than your cpu in 90% of applications!
gusnhde93 3 months ago
@gusnhde93 yeah just like an i3 performs better than bulldozer in most games.. lol.. and since you started your statement with an insult I won't even bother replying again
JoesPlaying 3 months ago
@JoesPlaying i3 performs better than all cpu's in most games... mother f@cker
gusnhde93 3 months ago
@ooBounceDKoo That and cool stuff like 32nm technology instead of 45nm..
Tha2ndWimp 8 months ago
@ooBounceDKoo are u gay? i5 2500k will smack AMD's top-of-the-line CPU, the phenom ii x6 1100t in everycase
rubix63 5 months ago
Intel Inside Says Intel Outside Sucks
MultiGtavc 9 months ago
overheating galore!
plumokin 9 months ago
Apple has disabled Intel Turbo Boost in the new 2011 13 inch Macbook Pro 2.7 ghz dual core processor while running Windows 7.
AlphaNOmega4ever 9 months ago
is it the same with 2 cores 4 threads? or its just with 4 cores?
coz i dont know yet what threads are.
Mr2pacLegend 9 months ago
@Mr2pacLegend yes it is not dependent on cores and by the way threads are simply the processes.
freemanintheworld 9 months ago
@freemanintheworld thank you for informations
Mr2pacLegend 9 months ago
@Mr2pacLegend you are welcome
freemanintheworld 9 months ago
@Mr2pacLegend Imagine that each member of your family giving you a list of tasks to complete almost simultaneously. 4 threads is the equivalent of 4 family members. Now imagine that you could delegate one list of tasks per friend, now because they are working in an confined space all of you friends can only work at a certain efficiency, but imagine that you had 4 friends, but 2 task-lists, without turbo-boost the two non-working friends would hinder the performance of the ones who do work.
sundhaug92 9 months ago
@sundhaug92 wow, that is realy interesting and thank you for the information.
Mr2pacLegend 9 months ago
Is it automatic?
YamiPoyo 10 months ago
@YamiPoyo
Yes
qpdbqpdb1 9 months ago
new fuck tecnology my hp dv7 runs now witcout turbo boost :-)
hallomaas 11 months ago
Intel turbo boost program works like shit on a HP Pavilion dv7-4195ed with a integrated soundcard! Delete the whole Intel/MSI Turbo tool, and your laptop works great, and have a beautiful sound.
supermuis62 11 months ago
a mac can half the power! thats why i love it. :>
ochgottnochma 11 months ago
@ochgottnochma you only need half the power when your running shit like a fuckin word processor
I KNOW RIGHT WORD PROCESSORS ARE HARD CORE
but on pc's you need the power for games.
"Which games" you ask
ALL OF THEM
nessnes64 10 months ago
WHEN SOME CORES IS "OFF", CORE VOLTAGE IS CHANGED?
ONE CORE WHICH IS "ON" HAVE TO MUCH VOLTAGE? (MY ENGLISH IS BAD I KNOW :p)
gonzales596 11 months ago
My i3 dont have turbo boost. =(
MRNU979 11 months ago
it very very very super super ultimate slow ~
totey8999 11 months ago
My i3 don't have it =( sad face.
MRNU979 1 year ago
it really FAST!
bobctx 1 year ago
man..amazing demo...now its crystal clear!!
rocko306x 1 year ago
@HackerBoy2610 no pentium 4 better!
MajorisGaming 1 year ago
Comment removed
MajorisGaming 1 year ago
Its' absolutly the best idea. Eko and Performance.
Hope that americans do some extra procesor that reduce price both :)
nyczek88 1 year ago
I don't really care what processor is inside the computer I buy. AMD or Intel. I care more about the graphicscard since I play games, not making stuff in photoshop and such...
nofreedomofspeech 1 year ago
@nofreedomofspeech In PC games the processor is much important as graphic card you dumb shit.
maorizio1 1 year ago
@maorizio1 It's definitly not! Anyone will tell you the GPU is much more important then the CPU when it comes to graphics, ask around first, talk later, dumb shit...
nofreedomofspeech 1 year ago
@nofreedomofspeech Really? so maybe everyone will buy a PC that cost 400$ and the best GPU in the market? It's better for you to STFU because when it comes to PC games every hardware is important, even the speed of your RAM, dumb shit.
maorizio1 1 year ago
@maorizio1 Of course every piece of hardware matters, the GPU is just the most important piece when it comes to gaming, oh and STFU
nofreedomofspeech 1 year ago
@maorizio1 Not to... umm... "ruin" your argument, but RAM frequency is actually extremely dependent from gaming given there is enough memory to hold the entire game on... the only exception, say, would be trying to run a game that requires 3.5gbs of RAM using only 2gbs installed. Then, obviously, the frequencies would actually be used transferring constant data to and from the RAM. Just making that clear, cheers mate.
guitarguy2637 10 months ago
12 Users from AMD got pc CRASH =))
IanasAnd 1 year ago
um someone please tell me how can i turn on turbo boost for my i7 860 =[
dynastyflygon 1 year ago
What is the meaning of the green caps?
Daghead 1 year ago
I love Intel, I personally have a Core i3 370M with just HT and it blows my old C2D away. I have ran 4 YouTube videos at once on my laptop and had no slowdown and wasn't even using half of the systems resources. Amazing!!
macgeek18 1 year ago
@macgeek18 Wow, I had 4 YouTube videos open on my Pentium III and the only think that was slowing down was the internet!
DellPrecisionM60 1 year ago
@macgeek18 While using a mac!?!?!?!?!? OMG! *Sarcasm* Mac sucks.
austin123457 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Intel doesn't just dominate AMD, it dominates it it over 9000 times and teabags it.
MrDimwit646 16 hours ago"
Lol now that was funny! Thanks
themachinedoctor 1 year ago
Intel doesn't just dominate AMD, it dominates it it over 9000 times and teabags it.
MrDimwit646 1 year ago
This looks really promising. I'm looking for a new computer next year with Intel Core i7 "Sandy Bridge" inside.
skydragon8525 1 year ago
smart bastards, love my i7.
NGT2O6 1 year ago
The Core i7 is the greatest invention since the wheel.
youngdones 1 year ago
Core 1 is being lazy >:D
usernamen0tfound 1 year ago
turbo mode = >400 KWh + fan noise + heat ??
whisperino 1 year ago
@whisperino more heat due to the 4 cores and more electricity, no fan noise.
XGCKrazyK 1 year ago
Sooo, they produce (for ex.) a 3,2GHz i7 CPU and they set/sell it as a 2,66GHz CPU, trying to convince the costumer that every time the CPU passes 2,66GHz is due to some new awesome feature called turbo boost?
Th3KiD88 1 year ago
@Th3KiD88 no, is more like the opposite. Intel sells you a 2.66GHz Cpu and when you are not using it fully, Intel overclocks the cpu for you, except for that Intel can adjust which cores are being overclocked and which one should be shut off to keep the energy under control. It more like power management/ overclocking rather than selling a 3.2GHz CPU at 2.66GHz
StarcraftTerran 1 year ago
from what material is the procesor build.
elbekir 1 year ago
@elbekir silicon
acewhyte 1 year ago
is turbo boost = over clocking?
ilovebreadcrumbs 1 year ago
@ilovebreadcrumbs yes. but not enthusiast overclocking. on the details page such as on newegg they list the specs on a processor and it has regular frequency and turbo mode frequency. the turbo mode is usually .2 higher, such as my I7 930 stock at 2.8, turbo mode 3.06.
Dogsofwar909 1 year ago
@ilovebreadcrumbs over clocking simplified I guess
gianlucanders 1 year ago
i can remember my old 486 too having a turbo mode... a whopping 66Mhz instead of 40 :)
SAButterbrot 1 year ago 80
@SAButterbrot yep, I had a button on the case to switch between 40 and 66mhz lol
UnforgivableMen 1 year ago
@SAButterbrot haha yeah, OH GOD we are so old...
BlueCrystalGem 1 year ago
@SAButterbrot wow thats fast lol
CoDMW2Player769 11 months ago
what are you talking bout? i cant hear lol
too fast
316308 1 year ago
Comment removed
316308 1 year ago
keep that up now intel. you have many technologies.
ZASmith102 1 year ago
or you could just oc the i7 920 to 4 ghz and forget about turbo boost all together.
Crozonexz 1 year ago
Do you need 8GB of RAM to run Intel Turbo Boost?
24Midnighttoker 1 year ago
@24Midnighttoker No.
SohnoJam 1 year ago
@24Midnighttoker : No, has nothing to do with RAM. Turbo Boost is automatic depending on load, power consumption, and temperature.
majestixblue 1 year ago
just myself an i7 975 for my rig lets see how my games will go with this along with 24 gb ram and gtx 465 SLI
classics4lf 1 year ago
@classics4lf wtf is wrong with you whyd you spend so much much you wont ebven use 6 gb of that 24 gb of ram,,,
Fatalsh0ts 1 year ago
@Fatalsh0ts Ramdisks maybe =D
PhillyB702 1 year ago
@Fatalsh0ts ummm why do people spend money on nice cars or hot tubs or big screen tv's if they dont need it you wanna know why bud money aint a problem
classics4lf 1 year ago
@classics4lf lol rich ass bastard
Fatalsh0ts 1 year ago
@classics4lf WHY THE FUCK A 465??
STCodes 1 year ago
@classics4lf 24GB is a bit overkill? xDD
sergo40 1 year ago
@sergo40 my friend has 32gb.... LOL and yes that is overkill sometimes, but he's running a server so i guess its a little different
askloglog 1 year ago
@askloglog Yeah, for servers it okay =p but when u got a gaming PC, too much ram could even make things slower..
sergo40 1 year ago
@sergo40 well it depends on how fast the ram is...
askloglog 1 year ago