@TalaJenta remember somthing 2 he also probably has the mind of a 2 year old kid so he really doesnt know the meaning of life or death, living or non-living so he may as well think that everything is like a toy or is somthing that he play with so that still wouldnt b his fault because he is pretty much an innocent kid in his mind when people think & see him as just a monster :3
Remember that the Monster was made with a criminal brain by accident. He doens't know what he's doing. He kind of has a pre-destined life: one evil deed after another and he can't help that. His creator is the one who ruined it for him. The Monster is the biggest victim of this whole story.
@TalaJenta Yes that is correct. He thinks she is pretty like the flowers and is just trying to do something nice. I guess having brain damage does not help. I think his name before was Abby something. Oh yeah Abby Normal LOL
Oh my god why are people so conservative! Firstly he didn't mean to do it. read the top comment. Secondly the girl didn't die anyway! No one dies in movies. Grow some balls and show respect to this scene. The people who cut it down in the original release (and other scenes as well) were assholes. Yes I know I know it was too much for back then. But why? This is what I truly don't get. It's just a movie. I hope in the future we humans get over this bullshit completely.
Actually, O'Reilly would be awesome here as Frankenstein, with Glenn Beck as Igor and (sadly impossible now) Michael Jackson as the Creature. Imagine audiences' horror as the Creature finds the little kid alone....
@viniciusb I'm complaining about a scene not being scary because of an unrealistic way of dying, and you think that the Final Destination movies would be my cup of tea? I see that YOU aren't more observant. ;) No, really, I thought the idea of the scene was brilliant, that's why I'm so disappointed by the crappy execution. You don't have to have great effects to throw the girl out a little more than two feet. When she can reach out and touch shore, I must laugh at her "drowning".
@t1mpani You'd be a pretty awful parent, I'm sorry to say. Children can drown in any water that is even mere inches over there head. Open water like this tends to be very murky, and visibility is less than a few inches in front of your nose. A small child like this could easily drown by being thrown out like this. You need a reality check.
@guilemaster147 LOL!!! Okay, goofball. For a start, I AM a parent, and all of my kids survived, because--among other things---I taught them how to SWIM! You know what kills far, far more children than drowning in shallow water? Plastic bags. So when they remake Frankenstein, we can have a scene where the monster is overcome by the beauty of clouds, sees a Walmart bag floating on the breeze, thinks it's a cloud and puts it over the kid's head, suffocating her. :)
@t1mpani Actually, while I do like the concept of this scene, I think that the book's scene is far more tragic, as the monster actually is saving a little girl who is drowning, but the father who's running up thinks he's attacking her and shoots the monster in the arm---rewarding his compassion, bravery and selflessness with pain and hatred. What the movie was going for ain't bad but it's not quite up to the original for pure audience sympathy.
@t1mpani That doesn't change the fact that a child can still die from something that was depicted in the movie, which was my point (which I noticed you avoided altogether...).
@guilemaster147 I didn't avoid it, I mocked it, by illustrating that kids can die of all sorts of things that don't make effective scenes. ;) Hey, if this is the greatest scene in movie history as far as you're concerned, that's fine! Chin up! You don't need my approval. It's okay!
@t1mpani That would be avoiding the point I was making. You claimed that something such as this couldn't kill a child. I proved that it could. That's all there was too it, I never said it was the greatest scene ever, now you're just shoving your own words into my mouth, just like that O'Reilly guy on Fox does.
@guilemaster147 Ah, I see. You're right---I was so intimidated by obvious enormity of your intellect that I didn't want to take you head on. ;) I wasn't intending to shove anything in your mouth, I just assumed--given your vehement defense of this particular scene--that you were taking it a bit personally. Very well---it's entirely possible that, right under the surface of the water, is a rock that hit her head. It's also possible it's a so-so scene in a great movie. ;)
@t1mpani Is the conscensus that she is supposed to have drowned? I thought that even then this was supposed to be a bit funny? I was pissing myself laughing! Just watched this tonight. Fantastic film though.
t1mpani ... I agree with what you are saying. I have tried watching Dracula with lugosi, and I cjust cant bring myself to enjoy, or appreciate it. Possibly the media from films, to video games, that I have grew up with has taken that away from me. I can see why it is great. But not enjoyed.
@BuckFastZombie I think the problem is I was too old when I saw them to actually be scared by them. The original novels are certainly scarier, and far better written, though the writing is certainly at a relaxed pace. I can appreciate the old Universal horror films on some levels, but have to smile that this movie was banned in many states because of it being so shocking. Especially when the truly excellent Nos Feratu preceded it by nine years, and THAT is a creepy movie.
There are plenty of lakes in the world that are very deep right from the shore. I am from a country that has almost around 200000 lakes and I have swum in lakes where it is so deep that an adult could drown, let a alone a small child. And if she couldn't swim, she would probably go into panic when thrown into the lake and wouldn't be able to reach for the shore.
People are saying they don't get this scene. He obviously thought that because flowers would float, he thought the girl would float aswell, to be showered with the flowers. He thought he was being nice but to everyone else, he's a murderer because he killed her, but it was an accident.He had just been created so it's like teaching a newborn everything about the world and he's confused. He's so misunderstood :( Him and Erik - Phantom of the Opera are two of the most misunderstood individuals.
yeah i dont think frankenstein is trying to kill people and yeah exactly he threw her in the water because she threw the flowers in the water so he's just trying to be nice but h does it on accident
@anticompfolkilation Actually, this scene wasn't trying to show how "the monster destroying innocence". Rather, according to the actor of the monster itself, Boris Karloff explained that in this particular scene, the monster sees Maria as a "flower", and therefore throws her into the water, just like Maria did with the flowers.
I'm sorry but the description although good, is flawed. James Whale was not the first person to make a film of Mary Shelley's novel, in fact, it was Thomas Edison. Just search up Frankenstein 1910 Thomas Edison on Youtube and you will see it.
@bulbasaurasrex I remember them showing this movie on tv around 1970. It was advertised heavily and was a big deal to get to see it. I was horrified that she died. I could feel the potential trouble brewing when he showed up in her yard. Disaster was inevitable.
In modern times this would be a comedic scene if it was exactly like this, but back then they didnt have computer graphics and so they had to have a grown man throw a little girl into a lake, obviously they woudnt risk hurting her in real life. You gotta understand the limitations with filmaking back then. Plus no one had ever seen anything like that back then anyways.
But yea despite all that, its one of the only scenes of a movie that kinda haunts me after iv already seen it a couple times
Boris Karlof had said in one of his later interviews he was not comfortable with this scene, he had a daughter about the age of this little girl and he felt very uneasy doing this scene, he wanted a clergy minister there on the set to forgive him for doing that and he bought the little girl actress her favorite food and gave her gifts that how he dealt with the scene
@OEKCVB "Boris Karlof had said in one of his later interviews he was not comfortable with this scene, he had a daughter about the age of this little girl and he felt very uneasy doing this scene, he wanted a clergy minister there on the set to forgive him for doing that and he bought the little girl actress her favorite food and gave her gifts that how he dealt with the scene"
Yea I'd know how hed feel, it dont seem that bad but anyone with a soul wouldnt be too comfortable doing that.
@MichaelMyers87 I agree in such as times as Karloff the 30's it was down played big time the drowning because the people seein the movie would actually hate Karloff as though he did the act, so they down played it even some say there is a copy that shows Frankinstien trying to pull her outta the water! but they say its a lost tape, can imagine todays horror no problem, kinda scary lol have you heard of a Halloween Movie coming in 3D with Michael Myers??? i heard abt it but see zero abt it?
@Lavourrin Haha, I thought the exact same thing! He doesn't talk, and the way he runs away looks exactly the same as Mr. Bean. The only difference is instead of something trivial, it's drowning a little girl XD
Keep in mind people that this was deleted until the late 80's because it was considered too horrifying for the time along with the end of Frankenstein's line when he first gave life to his creation. Frankenstein's line was cut by thunder, and this ended with him reaching for her (doesn't make much sense since that gives the impression he meant to hurt her and did far worse things). Still that says alot for this movie. It kinda reminds me of William Frankenstein's murder in the book too.
its a goof, if u look closely, shes sitting down with the flowers and kitty then when she stands up, shes just holding the flowers so its just a mistake and also where was the father, wasnt he close when that happend
Yes, unless an absolute abyss just happens to drop off right next to this little lake shore, I've always had trouble with her drowning in what couldn't have been more than two feet of water, with dry land in arm's reach. I love old horror films, but there are times when modern movie audiences can't enjoy them because of impatience, and other times when they can't enjoy them because some parts aren't made very well.
In addition to impatient, the other thing modern viewers are is more observant.
Nothing like that. I think a lot of us can appreciate what this scene was back in the day, and how it had impact, but you can't deny that it's dated, the way it's executed.
@t1mpani "Yes, unless an absolute abyss just happens to drop off right next to this little lake shore, I've always had trouble with her drowning in what couldn't have been more than two feet of water, with dry land in arm's reach."
Well I know what you mean, I was more creeped out by the original scene that cut off before hegrabbed her, but you could tell he was gonna throw her in. But still, some ponds/lakes do just drop off, plus people have drowned in shallow water from panicking before.
@MichaelMyers87 I understand that, but you have to be panicking pretty hard to not stand up in water that's below the height of your waist. Most people who drown in shallow water do so because of some other injury and/or being knocked unconscious, so fine-----he threw her into the water, and right below the waterline was a rock which struck her temple, rendering her unconscious. The extreme unlikelihood of all of this just proves that the Monster actually WAS evil because God hated him. :)
@t1mpani Yea good thinking, in the context of the movie she probably got knocked out by hitting a rock. But the Monster was afraid of the water so he was powerlus to save her.
@royalcourtier I watched Frankenstein once, on AMC, more than a decade ago. We ARE more observant---that doesn't mean we're smarter, just more tuned to this particular medium of entertainment, because we're more experienced in it. The average movie fan today sees many, many times more films than the moviegoer of the 1930s, and it's a part of everyday life versus an occasional treat. You may be...ummm...*special*, but most other people gain proficiency with experience. ;)
Correct. It must have been very shocking in its day. Even modern movies shy away from having a little girl die, for example take a look at that cartloiad of predictable suspenseless shit 'Jurassic Park''.
In the original story it was Frankenstein's nephew and the kid freaked out and said "My uncle Victor Frankenstein will get you".The monster kills the kid to get back at Frankenstein.
@271tixe Those ''morons'' can't feel its impact because it's a really dated scene. Tragic for its time, but not so much when compared to movies like Irreversible, Martyrs and Requiem for a Dream.
@AliG4life You're exactly right of course. It's dated and that is too challenging for most people. This is precisely why 271tixe is justified in calling them 'morons'. It's exactly the same syndrome that people can't and don't want to understand classical music. It's 'dated' - augghhh, too much for our little brains. Incredible how a piano recital by a world class performer draws an audience of 20 people, while millions tune in to vacuous trash on TV. Utterly upside down world we live in.
Actually the EdisonStudios filmed a version of Frankenstein in 1910.
GoodbyePanama 2 weeks ago
@TalaJenta remember somthing 2 he also probably has the mind of a 2 year old kid so he really doesnt know the meaning of life or death, living or non-living so he may as well think that everything is like a toy or is somthing that he play with so that still wouldnt b his fault because he is pretty much an innocent kid in his mind when people think & see him as just a monster :3
MichaelMyersLOVER100 3 weeks ago
@TalaJenta he still is a dumb ass
Blueslyfox 4 weeks ago
@Blueslyfox
his brain is from a rotted courpse, whatd you expect?
blackman2462 1 week ago
what a dumb ass
Blueslyfox 4 weeks ago
so funny
Frogginator7 1 month ago
Remember that the Monster was made with a criminal brain by accident. He doens't know what he's doing. He kind of has a pre-destined life: one evil deed after another and he can't help that. His creator is the one who ruined it for him. The Monster is the biggest victim of this whole story.
rungirlmgg 1 month ago 3
I feel terribly for that sweet little girl, but I also feel bad for Frankenstein. He didn't know what he was doing... :(
wafflewaffle90 1 month ago
I guess there was no such thing as "stranger danger" in those days.
toolazy4skewl 1 month ago
That little girl is pretty brave. If I saw something like that coming towards me, I would run away.
XeroChicken91 2 months ago
@TalaJenta Yes that is correct. He thinks she is pretty like the flowers and is just trying to do something nice. I guess having brain damage does not help. I think his name before was Abby something. Oh yeah Abby Normal LOL
alexlancer11 3 months ago
Oh my god why are people so conservative! Firstly he didn't mean to do it. read the top comment. Secondly the girl didn't die anyway! No one dies in movies. Grow some balls and show respect to this scene. The people who cut it down in the original release (and other scenes as well) were assholes. Yes I know I know it was too much for back then. But why? This is what I truly don't get. It's just a movie. I hope in the future we humans get over this bullshit completely.
PSspecialist 4 months ago
@jagdbird well oviosly youve never seen a good horror movie
TheTetrap 4 months ago 2
Lol how he ran away.
FreeButtSex 5 months ago
This is fucked up. I've never seen a child dying in a movie.
jagdbird 5 months ago
Actually, O'Reilly would be awesome here as Frankenstein, with Glenn Beck as Igor and (sadly impossible now) Michael Jackson as the Creature. Imagine audiences' horror as the Creature finds the little kid alone....
t1mpani 5 months ago
@viniciusb I'm complaining about a scene not being scary because of an unrealistic way of dying, and you think that the Final Destination movies would be my cup of tea? I see that YOU aren't more observant. ;) No, really, I thought the idea of the scene was brilliant, that's why I'm so disappointed by the crappy execution. You don't have to have great effects to throw the girl out a little more than two feet. When she can reach out and touch shore, I must laugh at her "drowning".
t1mpani 6 months ago
@t1mpani You'd be a pretty awful parent, I'm sorry to say. Children can drown in any water that is even mere inches over there head. Open water like this tends to be very murky, and visibility is less than a few inches in front of your nose. A small child like this could easily drown by being thrown out like this. You need a reality check.
guilemaster147 6 months ago
@guilemaster147 LOL!!! Okay, goofball. For a start, I AM a parent, and all of my kids survived, because--among other things---I taught them how to SWIM! You know what kills far, far more children than drowning in shallow water? Plastic bags. So when they remake Frankenstein, we can have a scene where the monster is overcome by the beauty of clouds, sees a Walmart bag floating on the breeze, thinks it's a cloud and puts it over the kid's head, suffocating her. :)
t1mpani 6 months ago
@t1mpani Actually, while I do like the concept of this scene, I think that the book's scene is far more tragic, as the monster actually is saving a little girl who is drowning, but the father who's running up thinks he's attacking her and shoots the monster in the arm---rewarding his compassion, bravery and selflessness with pain and hatred. What the movie was going for ain't bad but it's not quite up to the original for pure audience sympathy.
t1mpani 6 months ago
@t1mpani That doesn't change the fact that a child can still die from something that was depicted in the movie, which was my point (which I noticed you avoided altogether...).
guilemaster147 5 months ago
@guilemaster147 I didn't avoid it, I mocked it, by illustrating that kids can die of all sorts of things that don't make effective scenes. ;) Hey, if this is the greatest scene in movie history as far as you're concerned, that's fine! Chin up! You don't need my approval. It's okay!
t1mpani 5 months ago
@t1mpani That would be avoiding the point I was making. You claimed that something such as this couldn't kill a child. I proved that it could. That's all there was too it, I never said it was the greatest scene ever, now you're just shoving your own words into my mouth, just like that O'Reilly guy on Fox does.
guilemaster147 5 months ago
@guilemaster147 Ah, I see. You're right---I was so intimidated by obvious enormity of your intellect that I didn't want to take you head on. ;) I wasn't intending to shove anything in your mouth, I just assumed--given your vehement defense of this particular scene--that you were taking it a bit personally. Very well---it's entirely possible that, right under the surface of the water, is a rock that hit her head. It's also possible it's a so-so scene in a great movie. ;)
t1mpani 5 months ago
lol i love the end he sounds like peewee hurman haha
justhammond3 6 months ago
LOL! Hahaha.
BathorysGraveland 6 months ago
no, this is the first feature length Frankenstein. Edison made a version released in 1910, of course 16 minutes back then was very much a feature
TheMrAllenBlue 6 months ago
This was shot at malibou Lake near what is now a private pier. Ive been there and matched up the backgrounds.
ShockDoc 7 months ago
If flowers float... So do children!
Ye olde troll logic...
PeeingMyOwnBlood 7 months ago 2
@t1mpani Is the conscensus that she is supposed to have drowned? I thought that even then this was supposed to be a bit funny? I was pissing myself laughing! Just watched this tonight. Fantastic film though.
t1mpani ... I agree with what you are saying. I have tried watching Dracula with lugosi, and I cjust cant bring myself to enjoy, or appreciate it. Possibly the media from films, to video games, that I have grew up with has taken that away from me. I can see why it is great. But not enjoyed.
BuckFastZombie 7 months ago
@BuckFastZombie I think the problem is I was too old when I saw them to actually be scared by them. The original novels are certainly scarier, and far better written, though the writing is certainly at a relaxed pace. I can appreciate the old Universal horror films on some levels, but have to smile that this movie was banned in many states because of it being so shocking. Especially when the truly excellent Nos Feratu preceded it by nine years, and THAT is a creepy movie.
t1mpani 6 months ago
thats me
usbilly 8 months ago
Omg I saw this before it's like the only scene I payed attention to it's so sad!
AandGbffs 8 months ago
"oh no we're out of stuff to throw. what do we throw next?"
(monster looks at camera)
Na11441 9 months ago
There are plenty of lakes in the world that are very deep right from the shore. I am from a country that has almost around 200000 lakes and I have swum in lakes where it is so deep that an adult could drown, let a alone a small child. And if she couldn't swim, she would probably go into panic when thrown into the lake and wouldn't be able to reach for the shore.
Jakkoni 9 months ago
LOL
Mahmuang 10 months ago
lmao
MaroonStorm 10 months ago
People are saying they don't get this scene. He obviously thought that because flowers would float, he thought the girl would float aswell, to be showered with the flowers. He thought he was being nice but to everyone else, he's a murderer because he killed her, but it was an accident.He had just been created so it's like teaching a newborn everything about the world and he's confused. He's so misunderstood :( Him and Erik - Phantom of the Opera are two of the most misunderstood individuals.
boffinme80 10 months ago
Hhuij
NeonEccentric 11 months ago
yeah i dont think frankenstein is trying to kill people and yeah exactly he threw her in the water because she threw the flowers in the water so he's just trying to be nice but h does it on accident
Ohwow12341 11 months ago
what? she drowned in like 2 seconds i dont get it
101796bg 11 months ago
@anticompfolkilation Actually, this scene wasn't trying to show how "the monster destroying innocence". Rather, according to the actor of the monster itself, Boris Karloff explained that in this particular scene, the monster sees Maria as a "flower", and therefore throws her into the water, just like Maria did with the flowers.
YoIaMoNfire 1 year ago
I'm sorry but the description although good, is flawed. James Whale was not the first person to make a film of Mary Shelley's novel, in fact, it was Thomas Edison. Just search up Frankenstein 1910 Thomas Edison on Youtube and you will see it.
YoIaMoNfire 1 year ago
Yet these videos don't get taken down for copyright laws.
FUCK YOU YOUTUBE
Supramna92557 1 year ago
Classic. She takes a pretty nasty bellyflop. And I love his reaction after she sinks. He's like "Uh, nothing?"
niggly54 1 year ago
He accidentaly MARIA!!!!!!!
DII117 1 year ago
i really remember this part and i hate it.
CaptainScarlet2006 1 year ago
I love how the monster looks when he walks away after throwing her in.
He's like "Ow shit!!!!"
Berrylaff 1 year ago 4
A masterpiece of a scene from a masterpiece of a movie.
rolex452 1 year ago 2
he does shure played with her
Belsebubb93 1 year ago
i haven't seen the movie..does she die?
Jay4P 1 year ago
@Jay4P oooooh yes, she dies. the monster had a "murder's brain." If you weren't backed by an angry mob with torches, you never stood a chance.
uncannypk 11 months ago
Such a powerful scene, the cencors were lived with this back in the day.
ellbo2 1 year ago
@bulbasaurousrex o me too! And it's proven that movie scenes that stick with you will have an impact on your life
MackyzBack 1 year ago
Thumbs up if you're here because of James Rolfe
vaccarovj 1 year ago 15
@vaccarovj He's the Angry Video Game Nerd!
fuckballs109 1 year ago
wtf? Why is the water so deep when its right by the shore and stuff. This scene has its flaws but it's still sad
superfreakinawesome6 1 year ago 3
This movie is so sad. I remember this scene so well from when I was little. It's strange how some movie scenes stick with you so many years later.
bulbasaurasrex 1 year ago
@bulbasaurasrex I remember them showing this movie on tv around 1970. It was advertised heavily and was a big deal to get to see it. I was horrified that she died. I could feel the potential trouble brewing when he showed up in her yard. Disaster was inevitable.
2degucitas 1 year ago
But yea what I mean is like id be afraid to throw my little sis in a pond like that where she could get hurt by hitting a sharp rock or something.
MichaelMyers87 1 year ago
In modern times this would be a comedic scene if it was exactly like this, but back then they didnt have computer graphics and so they had to have a grown man throw a little girl into a lake, obviously they woudnt risk hurting her in real life. You gotta understand the limitations with filmaking back then. Plus no one had ever seen anything like that back then anyways.
But yea despite all that, its one of the only scenes of a movie that kinda haunts me after iv already seen it a couple times
MichaelMyers87 1 year ago 3
And I dont think anyone saying the scenes funny is sick minded or anything, they dont really quite grasp that its a scene of a little girl drowning.
Again as for the waters depth, perhaps she also had trouble swimming out due to having the shit scared out of her when he picked her up.
MichaelMyers87 1 year ago
I think I'm the only one who lol'd really hard. AM I A MONSTER? lolpun
xKanden15x 1 year ago
what a masterpiece
1354gaston 1 year ago
Frankenstein is the best Horror movie of all time? Fuck no. It's okay, but the Texas Chainsaw Massacre is the best!
Toby89195 1 year ago
this is the real reason why they invented rape whistels...just incase a Frankenstein tries to throw u in a lake :D
smatal 1 year ago
ahhh the poor little girl well frank didnt know that she didnt know how to swim it okay its just a movie :,(
TheThebffshow 1 year ago
this scene is so sad ): he didnt mean to kill her. he just didnt know any better :(
tatiethezombie 1 year ago
This is fucking cool.
thutton67 1 year ago
I fiund this kinda disturbing
TheCineMatt 1 year ago
Whoops....oh who the hell am i kidding, ROTFLOL!
zamorcordak 1 year ago
lol
Over9000Gingers 1 year ago
This is funny XD
dakgumpa 1 year ago
HAHAHAHA@!!!!! Thats not a Horror scene thats a funny scene
simonyaqoob 1 year ago
They should have done a POV of the monster, where he mistakes the girl as a flower. That would have been funny.
AliminiumHydroxide 1 year ago
IDIOTS!!
bibip12345 1 year ago
He didn't screw up with Alvin and the chipmunks.
he likes to be a friend with theodore, i don't think he can drown theodore.
MrHmongRooster 1 year ago
@viniciusb well remember he was a child killer right? frankinstein wasnt, con-air was a great movie though
OEKCVB 1 year ago
Boris Karlof had said in one of his later interviews he was not comfortable with this scene, he had a daughter about the age of this little girl and he felt very uneasy doing this scene, he wanted a clergy minister there on the set to forgive him for doing that and he bought the little girl actress her favorite food and gave her gifts that how he dealt with the scene
OEKCVB 1 year ago 5
@OEKCVB "Boris Karlof had said in one of his later interviews he was not comfortable with this scene, he had a daughter about the age of this little girl and he felt very uneasy doing this scene, he wanted a clergy minister there on the set to forgive him for doing that and he bought the little girl actress her favorite food and gave her gifts that how he dealt with the scene"
Yea I'd know how hed feel, it dont seem that bad but anyone with a soul wouldnt be too comfortable doing that.
MichaelMyers87 1 year ago
@MichaelMyers87 I agree in such as times as Karloff the 30's it was down played big time the drowning because the people seein the movie would actually hate Karloff as though he did the act, so they down played it even some say there is a copy that shows Frankinstien trying to pull her outta the water! but they say its a lost tape, can imagine todays horror no problem, kinda scary lol have you heard of a Halloween Movie coming in 3D with Michael Myers??? i heard abt it but see zero abt it?
OEKCVB 1 year ago
I don't know why, but it reminded me mr. Bean. He screws something up and runs away ;P
Lavourrin 2 years ago 6
hahaha
nashie17 1 year ago
@Lavourrin Haha, I thought the exact same thing! He doesn't talk, and the way he runs away looks exactly the same as Mr. Bean. The only difference is instead of something trivial, it's drowning a little girl XD
GelatinGhost 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Keep in mind people that this was deleted until the late 80's because it was considered too horrifying for the time along with the end of Frankenstein's line when he first gave life to his creation. Frankenstein's line was cut by thunder, and this ended with him reaching for her (doesn't make much sense since that gives the impression he meant to hurt her and did far worse things). Still that says alot for this movie. It kinda reminds me of William Frankenstein's murder in the book too.
balrog13571 2 years ago
Owned.
Mattoath 2 years ago 5
Poor Maria!
TudorRose85 2 years ago
Stupid Frankenstein. U throw flowers in the water not the little girl. 0_o
RandomUsername010 2 years ago 6
Aw :( he just wanted to make her float like the flowers :(
iluvflltby 2 years ago
LOL// makes me laugh every time =P
Koko0771 2 years ago
why does it sound like geoff and jack?
j2daworld 2 years ago
Owned.
BreakerSizzle 2 years ago 5
we watched this in film studie and a girl in our class said that it was cute
and what do you know :D lol
HirachieOfSociety 2 years ago
The monster think that the lake is not deep so it throws the child in the lake so that it can have an advantage
randomjomari 2 years ago
its a goof, if u look closely, shes sitting down with the flowers and kitty then when she stands up, shes just holding the flowers so its just a mistake and also where was the father, wasnt he close when that happend
kaijutube 2 years ago
the monster is rather sweet in this scene, despite his clumsy decision at he end
DrakeMagnum 2 years ago
Yes, unless an absolute abyss just happens to drop off right next to this little lake shore, I've always had trouble with her drowning in what couldn't have been more than two feet of water, with dry land in arm's reach. I love old horror films, but there are times when modern movie audiences can't enjoy them because of impatience, and other times when they can't enjoy them because some parts aren't made very well.
In addition to impatient, the other thing modern viewers are is more observant.
t1mpani 2 years ago 23
@t1mpani
Nothing like that. I think a lot of us can appreciate what this scene was back in the day, and how it had impact, but you can't deny that it's dated, the way it's executed.
Mrster 1 year ago
@t1mpani Oh, hush up.
thutton67 1 year ago
@thutton67
Don't tick me off, son, or I'll throw you into two feet of water, and we all know what happens then...
;)
t1mpani 1 year ago
@t1mpani "Yes, unless an absolute abyss just happens to drop off right next to this little lake shore, I've always had trouble with her drowning in what couldn't have been more than two feet of water, with dry land in arm's reach."
Well I know what you mean, I was more creeped out by the original scene that cut off before hegrabbed her, but you could tell he was gonna throw her in. But still, some ponds/lakes do just drop off, plus people have drowned in shallow water from panicking before.
MichaelMyers87 1 year ago
@MichaelMyers87 I understand that, but you have to be panicking pretty hard to not stand up in water that's below the height of your waist. Most people who drown in shallow water do so because of some other injury and/or being knocked unconscious, so fine-----he threw her into the water, and right below the waterline was a rock which struck her temple, rendering her unconscious. The extreme unlikelihood of all of this just proves that the Monster actually WAS evil because God hated him. :)
t1mpani 1 year ago
@t1mpani Yea good thinking, in the context of the movie she probably got knocked out by hitting a rock. But the Monster was afraid of the water so he was powerlus to save her.
MichaelMyers87 1 year ago
@t1mpani Modern viewers aren't more observant - stupid thing to suggest - we have computers and can freeze and replay films!
royalcourtier 6 months ago
@royalcourtier I watched Frankenstein once, on AMC, more than a decade ago. We ARE more observant---that doesn't mean we're smarter, just more tuned to this particular medium of entertainment, because we're more experienced in it. The average movie fan today sees many, many times more films than the moviegoer of the 1930s, and it's a part of everyday life versus an occasional treat. You may be...ummm...*special*, but most other people gain proficiency with experience. ;)
t1mpani 6 months ago
POOR MARIA...
GILBERT
rontiss1 2 years ago
haha what a goofball that frankenstein, the laughing stock of all the other monsters
grgemclr1992 2 years ago 5
Silly frankenstein little girls don't float.
TheSecretRiddle19 2 years ago 6
the tasty fat ones do...
DrakeMagnum 2 years ago
Your right I didn't think of that.
TheSecretRiddle19 2 years ago
There has been one Frankenstein movie before this, in 1910, it is without sound.
YellowStudios 2 years ago
Looks like a bunch of simple-minded idiots have posted before me on this video's page.
This is an immensely tragic and powerful scene from movie history. It figures most of you morons can't feel its impact.
271tixe 2 years ago 16
Correct. It must have been very shocking in its day. Even modern movies shy away from having a little girl die, for example take a look at that cartloiad of predictable suspenseless shit 'Jurassic Park''.
jegspillerpiano 2 years ago
In the original story it was Frankenstein's nephew and the kid freaked out and said "My uncle Victor Frankenstein will get you".The monster kills the kid to get back at Frankenstein.
lewisner 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ur a cartload of predictable suspensless shit, jurassic park was better than this movie and any video u ever made
kaijutube 2 years ago
@jegspillerpiano Modern mainstream movies, yes.
AliG4life 11 months ago
so you're some kind of douchebag i assume?
wesker789 2 years ago
@271tixe It's funny now, but fucked up back then XP
Over9000Gingers 1 year ago
@271tixe Those ''morons'' can't feel its impact because it's a really dated scene. Tragic for its time, but not so much when compared to movies like Irreversible, Martyrs and Requiem for a Dream.
AliG4life 11 months ago
@AliG4life You're exactly right of course. It's dated and that is too challenging for most people. This is precisely why 271tixe is justified in calling them 'morons'. It's exactly the same syndrome that people can't and don't want to understand classical music. It's 'dated' - augghhh, too much for our little brains. Incredible how a piano recital by a world class performer draws an audience of 20 people, while millions tune in to vacuous trash on TV. Utterly upside down world we live in.
jegspillerpiano 11 months ago
@jegspillerpiano Yeah, kinda. The majority of people just like simple movies, generic music and spoonfed stories. It's always been like that, though.
And this scene IS pretty funny, isn't it? :P
AliG4life 11 months ago
@jegspillerpiano You....YOU!!! just became my best friend!
KobraKrimson 7 months ago
@AliG4life
That doesn't really make sense. Tragedy isn't dated.
271tixe 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@271tixe But this movie is.
AliG4life 11 months ago
lol watched this for English. funniest movie evr
FIDDO881 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!
i like it when little girls die!
MUHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!
g1wrg1s 2 years ago
thatis so scary aaagghhhh
tmighty1990 2 years ago
what a good effects and music?! :O hahaha!
krisa1989 2 years ago
what happened to the kitty?
serbpunker 3 years ago
Poetic but so sad...
tazbahn 3 years ago 2
ah shucks i done and killed a yank. theys bound ta gimmie a lynchin anytime now
SmokeyMcPot420yee 3 years ago
I agree with the post below. I loved the movie, but I couldn't help but laugh during this scene. Great film.
mewashere 3 years ago 4
wow i was expecting something horrible and gruesome......but i guess this is the "movie magic" of the time haha
CHmoozic 3 years ago 5
poor kitty
patrick1010101010 3 years ago 3
awesome!!!
atfk13 3 years ago 4