Join my party, we stand for truth, freedom, liberty, justice, progression and peace. I know, I know they all say that, but my truth is the real truth lol.
...but obama is a socialist. he wants to regulate everything that moves. when you over regulate that takes away peoples freedom. oh by the way obama voted for the patriot act, and he doesnt support gay marriage. so where was obama when the patriot act passed? standing right behind bush. im not saying bush was a good president, in fact he was awful, but obama is destroying america. and march on wallstreet filled with rape, drugs, and homeless blamed successful people for their problems
Im pretty sure Mr. obama took away our right to trial with a jury of our peers. All the government has to do now is say "we think he might possibly maybe kinda be a terrorist" and into jail forever you go.
@TopTenCrew Oh yes, that makes SO MUCH SENSE. Because, clearly, the amount of time spent in your house directly affects your beliefs and opinions. Oh, and your god is anything but glorious. Go take a long walk off of a short pier.
@TopTenCrew True but I would say unless you saw what was happening first hand, News and such is probably bias or single-sided. So limiting yourself to internet is probably more accurate than allot of newspapers.
Have you ever considered doing something on the New World Order thing? I have friends who believe in it... I'd send you the videos that they sent me to convince me it's real, if you want to view them in specific. Oh, they also believe that Obama is out to kill everyone for the NWO... I know you do your research too, I'd like to see what you come up with in the end.
I was right here cheering him on! that's right this so called President can go where he is headed Hell!! he will be right beside you. I am free I do not Protest thank you and Bush needs to be back get this idiot out. gays need not be married are you gay and nothing you speak is truth as for guns taken? never he will be out of there soon Obama has ruined us. the Antichrist? never know. you don't know the truth... shut up for a while and you might know it..
@childrenfromabove your an idiot, you just said alot of hateful nonsense and didnt back it up with any logic of facts whatsoever.
your just a hater, a hate demon if you will causing misery on all those who want to understand and help others stop talking about hells and antichrists if that stuff really existed you'd be the minion of the devil.
@stupidATHIESTS Even unintelligent things (athiests, for example) were designed. When a moron says that "life was designed by nature", he's admitting, in his own feeble way the same thing, only in a fairy tale fashion. But, who designed God? Nobody did. Better hide, here's something your Maker said: Revelation 1:8 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.
this is what i mean. when you read my comment on people MUST understand that if something makes them THAT angry that it is almost always something they are uncertain of or angry about in themselves. occupy wallstreet is angry as they are because they did NOT pay attention until now. they wont tell you that but its the truth.
@TearsOfWar1 actualy no, saying "fuck of yourself bitch" is correct grammar. You told him to fuck off and he basically said "NO U". You just got double grammar nazid, bitch.
@TearsOfWar1 nono, see, if you understood language at all, youd know he wasnt saying "Fuck yourself off", but rather "fuck off, yourself". See, it was a retort, as i have previously explained, to you saying "fuck off" to him.
@shazzy544 There was no coma in between 'off' and 'yourself', you idiot. Check your original comment if you don't believe me. I understand language just fine, moron, it's you that doesn't. Go back to English class. Or if you are currently taking that, pay attention harder.
@shazzy544 Nazid? That is not a word. You need to know grammar before you can be a Grammar Nazi. Capitalize bitch because you were using it as a name and you would also have to capitalize "Nazid". "Actualy" is not a word. I think you meant actually. "Fuck of yourself bitch" is not correct grammar. It would be "Fuck off, bitch" or "Fuck you, bitch" but "Fuck of yourself bitch" is not correct grammar. The "of" is wrong and no comma is wrong. You are an idiot.
@elnoraemily Nazid? Nazid is not a word. You need to know grammar before you can be a, Grammar Nazi. Capitalize bitch, because you were using it as a name and you would also have to capitalize, "Nazid". "Actualy" is not a word, I think you meant actually. "Fuck of yourself bitch" is not correct grammar, It would be, "Fuck off, bitch" or "Fuck you, bitch", but "Fuck of yourself bitch" is not correct grammar. The "of" is wrong and no comma is wrong. You are an idiot: Corrected commas!
@XxGonixXFAN Nice try, however, you are wrong. There should be no comma after "a" and before "Grammar Nazi". That is incorrect. Also no comma after "capitalize" and "Nazid". I do not know who taught you to put commas there, but that is not grammatically correct by any stretch. You put a comma after word, when it should either be a period (which it was) or a semicolon because it is two different sentences with no conjunction.
@XxGonixXFAN "It would be" should not be separated by commas. There should be a period and then the "it would be" (with no comma after it, either). There should be no comma before or after the "but" because it is not joining a list and the second sentence is conjoined to the first. You attempted to do "corrected commas" but all of the corrections you attempted were false and grammatically incorrect. Do not try to correct someone if you do not know grammar. I appreciate the effort.
@elnoraemily It's okay to be butthurt. Not everyone's grammar is good. Some people have shit for grammar and others don't. It's okay, buddy. Maybe next time you'll get it, who knows! Have a great day and stay in English class!
@XxGonixXFAN Uhm. I am not butthurt, as you so eloquent stated. Do I really have to post links to the correct use of commas? You put them in places they do not belong. You were being grammatically incorrect and trying to change a grammatically correct sentence. They do not go after random words and in the middle of sentences, which is where you tried to put them.
@elnoraemily "They do not go after random words and in the middle of sentences, which is where you tried to put them." if that is the case, why, pray tell, does that sentance have a comma in the middle of it?
@dorianleakey Am I the only person who has ever taken a grammar class? It is not in the middle. The word "Which” is a conjunction in this sentence, separating two thoughts. They are conjoined. The sentences are able to stand alone on their own. A semicolon would not be appropriate because there is a word being used to conjoin the sentences to each other. It would be a run-on sentence without the comma in place. How can the two of you not write the language you speak?
@elnoraemily Also I notice you did not find anything to criticize in my post, yet you tell me I cannot write the language I speak. Basically you do not like people disagreeing with you, do you?
@dorianleakey You wish to be critiqued? Your first post has two awkward conjunctions (why and pray tell) and does not flow. You did not capitalize "if" and you spelled "sentance" wrong. In your second post, "Basically" should have a comma after it. "Also" should have a comma after it. You do not need the "do you" at the end of the sentence because it is redundant with the "you do not."
@elnoraemily I disagree with you on all your points and I just do not believe you.
Everything you have written is awkward to read and yet you try criticize others writing.
No matter what I write you will find it wanting, why? because I disgree with you, and all who disagree with you must be stupid, in your arrogant little mind.
Now your tone shows that you are arrogant, at least that is something you wont be able to disagree with.
@dorianleakey You amuse me. The person who cannot write correctly is trying to argue syntax. Arrogant? No, I am not. I just do not like it when people butcher their language and attempt to justify their own mistakes. I find it slightly saddening when people refuse to learn. So goes life, I suppose. I hope you have a nice day.
@elnoraemily I have not butchered my language, i have made slight mistakes that most educated people would happily ignore because the general feel of what I write is completely acceptable and easy to read.
You are choosing a mechanical view of language not because its important to you, or because my crimes against language are so serious but to win.You also have made mistakes even if they are typos and some of what you write does not flow well so cut others some slack.
@dorianleakey The vast majority of even the most educated people do not remember the details good grammar but the feel. The terminology of even the basics slips most of our minds and we even need to pause to remember the difference between a noun and a verb let alone what alone reflexive pronouns.
And its a full stop not a period, arse.
I feel stupid for getting into these pointless arguments but never mind. What it the point? why? WHY?
@elnoraemily Actually I am sorry, I should not get involved in these arguments. I do still feel you may be getting riled up and pulling grammar apart rather than arguments, ut never mind. The disagreement reminded me of a clip- that mitchell and webb look - pedants unite.
@dorianleakey In the third post, the entire first sentence is a run on and should be separated from the main point. Once again, there is an "also" without the comma after it and the entire second paragraph is cut off at a strange point. The "because" should not be there. It makes the sentences sound as though they run together. I teach, genius, which is why I know that you are completely and utterly wrong in every way about English.
@dorianleakey Before another fail of the English language on your part comes up, there is a comma after sentence and before separating because that would also be a run on sentence without it. This is fourth grade level grammar, if not before. It is rather pathetic that two people could have such a misunderstanding of something this simple.
@elnoraemily You have made mistakes here with a missing word and the whole thing not scanning well, that aside, I think you do not remember your grammar classes accurately.
Also you are using an argument about grammar to avoid discussing anything of substance. Because you then can keep pretending you are clever, when you are not.
@dorianleakey I am clever, my dear, and I have the IQ tests to prove it. It is you who does not remember how to write this language. You, however, have made it very clear that you have never gone to college. You are truly pathetic at English and even try to be psychoanalytic. I find it disturbing that unintelligent people who can barely write try to act like they know what they are talking about, even though their grammar and poor syntax shows that they actually have no idea.
@XxGonixXFAN Why did you put a comma before Grammar Nazi? That comma is not needed. It should not be after bitch because bitch was not being used as a name and should not be before Nazid. Having a comma before I and after word is also incorrect. It would have to be a semicolon. You need to take English or go to college. Either one.
@4u2Chucky, I believe TAA despite the thought of being of any use to people he hates, which includes about 99% of them. I must say I understand him well. The world is filled to the edge by dumb fucks who hails steal and share mentality.
What a clueless dumb fuck this is. He doesn't even know fascism and socialism are closely bounded together far into the left side of politics. Both got this in common:
-Do NOT respect the individual-
If there is a premise that make sense to help locate an -ism along the poltical axis, it must be the one premise that forbid coercion against honest man.
Then you easily can place Right Anarchism at the most right followed by libertarianism. Everything else you find somewhere at the left site.
@klm4298, no you dumb fucking retard, it isn't. Fascism and and socialism got the most important point of view in common, namely: how much does the -ism respect the choice of the individual?
Fascism and socialism both hold ideology higher than the individual. In an axiomatic system nothing else but plancing them both at the same side makes sense.
@Idol2011no Yes, sir it is. This isn't a debate it's easily obtainable common knowledge. The naming of a political ideology has nothing to do with what it is. Just look it up.
@klm4298, in fact it is a great debate and it has been on and off since last WW. When grouping different -ism, the reasonable way to do it, is by emphasize the most, what is most important to the individual, which is to be free and not coerced. Fascism, Communism, nazism, liberalism, socialism, got the most important thing in common: They do not respect the individual's freedom, but raise ideology above humans. It makes perfect sense to place them all at the shitty left side: axiomatic devide.
"Then you easily can place Right Anarchism at the most right followed by libertarianism. Everything else you find somewhere at the left site."
You're talking about Authoritarianism vs. Libertarianism, only one of many axes by which a political movement can be examined (and by no means the "most important"). It is NOT to be confused with the Left-Right axis, which generally measures social and fiscal responsibilities of the apparatus chosen on the Authoritarian-Libertarian axis.
For example, the Fascist regime of Germany employed an extraordinarily autocratic system, represented by a very high Authoritarian score. Meanwhile, their social and fiscal policies were a distinct mixture of Left and Right, resulting in a fairly Centrist movement.
Compare this to the CCCP. They too had a strongly Authoritarian apparatus (especially under Stalin), but the social rhetoric and redistributive economics were hard to the Left.
@SocialistCatgirl, it's meaningless to devide liberty into personal and economical freedom. Only extremly dumb fucks do that. What my hand do/produce is only an extention to my hand.
There are only two kinds of people. They who respect the individual and they who do not. The latter may die by force. In reasonable sense (not to be confused by legitimate) they lack right to live. The only reason they still exist is because they still are to many. We will soon solve this problem.
"The only reason they still exist is because they still are to many. We will soon solve this problem."
Okay, honey. You've just said that your political enemies don't have the right to live, and that it is perfectly acceptable to kill them. In fact, you go on to say that the only reason you haven't already tried is because there are just too many of them. In academic circles we call such a thing a genocide.
You're closer to being a swastika-swinger than I am.
@SocialistCatgirl wrote: "In academic circles we call such a thing a genocide."
No, we don't. Such a name imply the killings are not justified, which is far from the truth. Even in the eyes of people who hail steal and share mentality there is a consensus of using all necessary means to halt coercion. They have only extended it with an exeption for themself, which only makes their point of view into a contradiction. Thus, we can ignore the exeption, and then kill'em all by their own standard.
There is no qualifier regarding "justified killing" in the definition of genocide.
Here's a hypothetical for you: a large group of non-Libertarians decides that Libertarians don't deserve to live. They all decide to grab guns, converge on your house, and shoot you dead in front of your wife and children. They then ask your wife if she's a Libertarian. She says yes, and is promptly shot in the head. The kids are taken to a political re-education camp.
Yes, there is. Without it, it would be impossible to think of genocide as something unwanted.
"What would you call this?"
Murder. When killing a person hailing steal and share mentality I call it a wanted kill.
Your (pato)logic(al) problem consists of unability to distinguish between two incompatible examples. You need to learn to differ between attack and defense in context of, to kill. One is murder. The other is not.
KILLING IN SELF DEFENSE?!! Are you out of your fucking MIND? You're telling me that if you reversed the roles and busted into my house, asked me if I am anything other than a Libertarian or a Right Anarchist, I said yes, and you shot me, you'd be ACTING IN SELF DEFENSE? That the systematic killing of anyone other than Libertarians and Right Anarchists is not genocide, but a justified war?
And you don't see a parallel between Hitler and yourself? Stalin, Mao, and yourself? Fuck off!
"And you don't see a parallel between Hitler and yourself?
When it comes to want to kill alot of people, yes. When it comes to choose reasonable, no.
Hitler and Stalin are close to your doctrine. Like them, you're unable to live without wanting to coerce. That's your logical problem when it comes to using your brain to think reason with. Probably also a pathological problem. You deserve to die, but not without months of pain.
The FBI should be monitoring your internet activity, phone conversations, and interviewing your friends on polygraph. You're a fucking terrorist in the making, a damned Timothy McVeigh wannabe. In fact, I have half a mind to INFORM them about you. Watch what you say and do for the rest of your life, they'll be watching. Don't be shocked if a unit in body armor smashes your door down one day.
@SocialistCatgirl, Britannica, terrorism: "the systematic use of violence to create a general climate of fear in a population and thereby to bring about a particular political objective"
I cannot think of a better way to get rid of steal and share mentality. There is no sign to accomplish this without blood flow, coarse feed in the streets. Many socialists and other kids of psychopaths are unable to think of a life without wanting to steal from others. They understand only violence and death.
You think it's appropriate to kill your political enemies, indeed you think it's necessary to do so rather than trying your hand at democratic opposition. You view terrorism as a practical route to your ends, even a preferable one. You disregard the humanity of all who are not like you, arguing that they're lesser beings who aren't worthy of life and are incapable of reason.
If you're trolling, I strongly recommend you drop the Fascist bullshit. It's going to get you arrested.
@SocialistCatgirl, whether or not they are political enemies is irrelevant, you extremly dumb fuck. How many times must I explain the killings are motivated by coercion directed against me? Where do they grow retards like you, unable to use brain to think reason with?
"How many times must I explain the killings are motivated by coercion directed against me?"
You know, most genocidal maniacs make the argument that they're acting in self-defense and for the good of all. Hitler said that the Jews were keeping the German people down. Osama Bin Laden says that Americans are keeping Middle Eastern Muslims down. The Hutu in Rwanda said that the Tutsi were all universally a threat to stability and spies for a rebel faction.
@SocialistCatgirl, Yes, many have falsely claimed to be supressed, but where this has not been true. Moreover, many have truthfully been suppressed and claimed to be so. It includes people who have lived under the emperors and sultans, kings and queens. Social Democracy and Tsars. You do not have with reason been able to justify why I belong to the group who lie about being supressed. In fact, you have shown that your power of argumentation levels with kids in kindergarden. You're a dumb fuck.
You know what REALLY sickens me about your argument? There are GENUINE human rights abuses by third world dictators, and you're here crying and screaming about the "steal and share" of having to pay taxes and obey civic laws. No one busts your door down and steals your children to fill the ranks of a child army. No one kills you if you speak up about your opinion on tax codes or if you vote against the majority party. You're not in a work camp.
@SocialistCatgirl, yes, there are people more supressed than me, but this fact doesn't remove supression directed against me. If your text shall be read as if a reasonable human did write it, your fallacious appeal to people under greater supression must mean that you in fact realise that I in fact am supressed by your psychopathic kind of thinking. Maybe there is still hope to help your brain to think reasonable with. Why don't you give it a try, stupid?.
You have free speech. You have the right to assemble. You can worship as you wish (or not at all). You have the right to redress your grievances with your representatives. You have the right to VOTE for your representatives in free and fair elections. You have the right to free press. You have the right to bear arms. You have the right to a fair trial and representation at said trial. You cannot be arrested without committing a crime or conspiring to.
@SocialistCatgirl, yes, you're right. I am given right to choose my master. Thanks for pointing out something that serves to clearify my point. How old are you?
Old enough to know that you haven't made a SINGLE specific complaint yet. All you've done is made nebulous claims about being repressed without ever saying how. It's all:
"Blah blah blah, let's kill everyone but the Anarchists and Libertarians, blah blah blah, anyone who questions me is stupid, blah blah blah, terrorism is okay as long as I'm the terrorist, blah blah blah, government is slavery, blah blah blah."
Go live in the fucking woods as a hermit if you hate society so much.
@SocialistCatgirl, no, dumb fuck you are. Terrorism is perfectly okay to fight initiated coercion. Who is the terrorist is not relevant. She The Socialist Dumb Fuck Understands It Soon, if I only write it many enough times. Terrorism is perfectly okay to fight initiating coercion. Who is the terrorist is not relevant. She The Socialist Dumb Fuck Understands It Soon, if I only write it many enough times. Terrorism is perfectly okay to fight initiating coercion. Is it fun to be a dumb fuck?
You're just a little bitch trying to piss people off so you can troll them, and you're too fucking stupid to realize that if you take on the identity of a Timothy McVeigh wannabe and say you want to kill almost everyone in America (in a public forum, no less) the Dept. of Homeland Security and the FBI are going to raise an eyebrow each. You're too fucking stupid to even realize that they're probably watching you RIGHT NOW.
You're on the road to Guantanamo and don't even realize it.
You deserve it, by the way. A clearer case of probable cause cannot be found. And if you are a terrorist (which I seriously doubt), then you're DEFINITELY not the leader. You're TOTALLY bullet-bait material, since you can't reason your way out of a fucking paper bag.
"Duhhh....I are oppressed. Me no can explain how in detail, but I are oppressed. You not buleev me becuz I not tell you how I oppressed? You stoopid. Me should kill you. You is oppressor two."
@SocialistCatgirl, from the very start in this conversation I've been talking about the "steal and share- mentality" that is taken place all around the world in all the governments and still you need to get spelled out exactly what theft I'm refering to. You must be the dumbest fuck ever.
Why should I be afraid to tell I want to slay all human beings who support steal and share- mentality? I'm telling the truth and do only support necessary means to get rid of it: systematic mass killings.
You need to define what the fuck the "steal and share" mentality IS, you idiot. Is it taxation in general, or is it a certain application of tax revenue? Is it delivery of social welfare programs alone, or is it also construction and maintenance of public infrastructure? Would government-funded medical research fall under "steal and share"? SAY. WHAT. YOU. WOULD. CHANGE. DAMN. IT.
You have exactly ONE comment to start making a case before I tell you where to shove it.
@SocialistCatgirl, no, dumb fuck. expressions are not defined. Only words. Steal is to take from another what belongs to another without his consent. Now go figure what I can mean by "steal and share- mentality", dumb fuck.
Everyone, let the record show that I gave this man ample opportunities to make a compelling argument for his side. He consistently refused to do so, instead resorting to a storm of ad hominem attacks. At no point in his babbling argument about genocide being justified because he is coerced did he EVER explain HOW he is coerced, which I take as evidence that he is NOT coerced at all and simply cannot construct even a FICTIONAL case for himself.
@SocialistCatgirl, I didn't think this dumb fucking gal would be able to connect the dots from my definition. Nor did I believe she would make a honest try. She's a socialist.
I just saw an interesting movie that gave me hope it would be possible in the future to grow a deadly (painful too) virus to whom only socialists are not immune.
And by the way, you bushwackin', shit-kickin', gun totin' piece of shit: the word is "pathological". And so you can use it PROPERLY next time, the term pertains to diseases and deviations from social norms. For inanimate objects, it refers to deviation from an expected norm.
Also, "unability"? IT'S "INABILITY" DAMN YOU!
A retarded motherfucker like YOU is trying to take control of the globe? Yeah, you'd pretty much HAVE to kill all the smart people for THAT to happen.
Because it sounds to ME like you would call it good politics. After all, you're calling for the systemic murder of all YOUR political opponents, guffawing that they don't deserve to live anyway. You're protecting people from being coerced by...coercing them with murder and force.
@lima33ful Its pathetic how you try to act like if you were Sokrates. What he said was that he wished they would shut up, not literally kill them. Stop trying to point out blemishes, its just really annoying.
@CoHReplaysHD No, he said that he wished he had a grenade that he could throw in their midst. That I believe is violent. He's a hypocrite moron. By the way it's "Socrates".
@CoHReplaysHD No, I believe it reflects the real mindset of the left. Violence is fine as long as it is directed at someone who disagrees with them. Not that he would have the slightest idea of how to use a grenade. BTW in English, the lanquage we're speaking right now, it's Socrates. But don't worry, I'm ever so impressed by your use of his native tongue.
@lima33ful He was purposely exaggerating to illustrate how mad he was. You can figure that out by the context it was said in. It's called figurative language. You must be a drag to be around since you take everything literally.
i hate obama america is in debt hmmm i wonder why?..... maybe because we keep giving other countries fucking money help america first then others also these laws are getting fucking stupid
@SamIsATotalBeast basically america is in debt and obama is wandering why the reason why is because we are giving all of our money to other countries that probably dont need it
this is so sectarian. all these massive plural "you's" and "we's" hurt to listen to
honestly man turn off CNN and turn on your thinking cap
do you REALLY believe all of the people who voted for push share all these conceptions and morals youre listing, you beleive them same applies to those who voted for obama ??
oh and..obama = the same
although this video is 3 years old you probably clued into that by now.. i hope
There is no conservative people & liberal people. The true conservatives (& liberals) aren't out there protesting. Honestly, I've been there: most of those people only protest because it's trendy & is in line with what they think they believe. Everyone should be required to take a political philosophy class... at least.
Both Republicans and Democrats should agree on one thing. Let us not let any ruler lile Bush or Obama take our freedom. We need to remember that eventhough it is not good to have all of this in fighting amoung the parties it is good in that it is good for us not to develop Herd mentality like other factious communist countries have had where there is only one party in control of the police state.
@Zephyesa um i dont think people come to the beach to hear you read the bible. And it isnt very calming and peacful what with its hate, rape, murder, worldwide floods, destruction of cities and anilmal sacrife. Thats at least what i noticed when i read it
Amazing Athiest you are at the gates of hell, that anger in you is the heat of Satans fire on your face, follow Jesus instead and you will cool off quickly and feel much better about everything and peaceful inside, I like to read the Bible on the beach and I feel great, and I also know that all the other people on the beach have come there, for me to read my Bible to them.
"You want this! You need this! Eat this! Don't smoke! Don't think! This is truth! Now regurgitate! And Obey! Keep in order! Fall in line! We are in control for you!"- Media and government relations. Your children are constantly exposed to these messages, but you don't know that because you are too and so am I.
@givewarachance17 you blithering flipping moron! He was talking about ABORTION! Being gay is not a "reproductive right" how do you posess the brain capacity to breathe?
4:10 There is no "reproductive freedom" that conservatives are against, because gays cannot reproduce. Conservatives are against gay marriage BECAUSE they cannot reproduce...Not exactly, but you get what I'm trying to say.
First they came for the rich, then they came for the tea party conservatives, then they came for the Christians, then they came for the Democrats/Atheists/Teachers/Union members. Then the only ones left not in the Gulag was the Satanic Socialists like you! What a sad end to the world. Bunch of lost dark souls with no God, No Country, No clue!
Consider the source... this clown is the product of todays Socialist / Liberal leaning education system. There have been people like this indoctrinating vulnerable minds forever it seems. People need to hear both sides of an argument and make their own decisions. Until there are an equal amount of Liberal Teachers to Conservative Teachers this will be the result. Carl Marx would be proud of this wacky individual. lol
@Rockonrick51Unfortunately since most conservatives are too stupid to be teachers the system has unfortunately more liberal teachers. I also echo his feeling that you are an ignorant moron using the term "Socialist" without understanding it because you god's on Fox News have told you how to think. I also see you didn't debate any of his points, and also resorted to a personal attack. I see again and again you morons have to resort to personal attacks because you are too stupid to debate.
@Rockonrick51 Makes no sense. There should be no equal ratio of liberal and conservative teachers. There should be no teaching of opinions in school. Teachers should teach what's on the agenda, not what they believe is right. The teachers need to teach what people believe, but they SHOULDN'T teach what they want the kids to think is right.
I find this rather amusing if nothing else haha. Hey man why don't you get a few facts and come back and try again haha. I don't know where you get this notion that republicans think curing sick people is evil....... That's news to me haha. Especially seeing as how my dad is a republican and a DOCTOR! haha. Verry funny......... He thinks curing people is evil yet he spends 13+ hours a day doing just that haha. Sorry buddy but I think your the one who can't handle "the truth"
@sc91084 Yeah you father probably is part of the health care system that overcharges for really poor care that is trying to be fixed by the "Affordable Health Care Act" all you children of privilege have called "Obamacare" well here's some facts for you the average cost of health care has gone up in cost due to greedy bastards like your dad to a level that most average American's can't afford.
@egcroan Typical liberal. You whine when others make personal attacks on you or your fellow liberals, but you jump at the chance to attack total strangers. You don't know the first thing about me OR my father, and clearly nothing about doctors. DOCTORS DONT SET THE PRICE YOU IGNORAMUS! My so called creedy father (which he's not) would be the first to say something needs to be done but NOT Obamacare. my father works 13+ hr days just to try and make his office run because oh gee....medicare
@sc91084 Give me a fucking break your father by no means works those kinds of hours and most Doctors make $200K a year so please spare me your dribble.
@sc91084 Typical liberal just shows you have no mind for yourself, and are most likely the mindless morons who think Glen Beck is serious. he is just playing a role, and most of fox News guys are of stirring up hatred to keep us focused on each other rather than the rich bastards who are ruining this country. Doctor's don't set the price ?? who does then ?? whose the ignoramus now, how can you even say such a stupid thing. I am an independent, and used to be considered a conservative.
LIE TO ME! HEY! LIE TO ME! HEY!
SpitViciouz 1 hour ago
Join my party, we stand for truth, freedom, liberty, justice, progression and peace. I know, I know they all say that, but my truth is the real truth lol.
HellfireScorpio 2 days ago
Where were you the day Kennedy was shot?
TheRealDooch 4 days ago
I had to switch to full screen on account of ron paul's face.
mortemdrummer 1 week ago
...but obama is a socialist. he wants to regulate everything that moves. when you over regulate that takes away peoples freedom. oh by the way obama voted for the patriot act, and he doesnt support gay marriage. so where was obama when the patriot act passed? standing right behind bush. im not saying bush was a good president, in fact he was awful, but obama is destroying america. and march on wallstreet filled with rape, drugs, and homeless blamed successful people for their problems
908clayton 1 week ago
@908clayton mabye he is a socialist in the good ol' usa but ,i who is from sweden can only lol at that statment
TheBeeFart 1 week ago
@908clayton "march on wallstreet filled with rape, drugs, and homeless". You have got to be one of the stupidest motherfuckers on the planet.
TicklesMcLolz 5 days ago
This guy deserves respect.
He's blunt as a fucking tumour, but he knows what he's talking about and let's you know when he isn't 100% sure. His videos need more views
TheWilderMusic 1 week ago
I guess this guy probably believes that only republicans do this. Both play that stupid game. Boy you needs to get laid, by a female this time.
moxydesign 1 week ago
I klicked because you were yelling at the thumbnail. You usualy say something smart when you're yelling.
pelle1243 2 weeks ago
Im pretty sure Mr. obama took away our right to trial with a jury of our peers. All the government has to do now is say "we think he might possibly maybe kinda be a terrorist" and into jail forever you go.
bmaseray 2 weeks ago
Might want to get out of the house. Then you might see the glory of God.
TopTenCrew 2 weeks ago
@TopTenCrew nope its the shame that is humanity
akaviri001 2 weeks ago
@TopTenCrew Oh yes, that makes SO MUCH SENSE. Because, clearly, the amount of time spent in your house directly affects your beliefs and opinions. Oh, and your god is anything but glorious. Go take a long walk off of a short pier.
Zodiacrin 1 week ago
@Zodiacrin
Actually, spending all day in your basement, as this guy clearly does, would tend to make your unaware of whats really going on.
TopTenCrew 1 week ago
@TopTenCrew True but I would say unless you saw what was happening first hand, News and such is probably bias or single-sided. So limiting yourself to internet is probably more accurate than allot of newspapers.
SilaconYT 1 week ago
Have you ever considered doing something on the New World Order thing? I have friends who believe in it... I'd send you the videos that they sent me to convince me it's real, if you want to view them in specific. Oh, they also believe that Obama is out to kill everyone for the NWO... I know you do your research too, I'd like to see what you come up with in the end.
jalski1downshroom 2 weeks ago
I was right here cheering him on! that's right this so called President can go where he is headed Hell!! he will be right beside you. I am free I do not Protest thank you and Bush needs to be back get this idiot out. gays need not be married are you gay and nothing you speak is truth as for guns taken? never he will be out of there soon Obama has ruined us. the Antichrist? never know. you don't know the truth... shut up for a while and you might know it..
childrenfromabove 2 weeks ago
@childrenfromabove your an idiot, you just said alot of hateful nonsense and didnt back it up with any logic of facts whatsoever.
your just a hater, a hate demon if you will causing misery on all those who want to understand and help others stop talking about hells and antichrists if that stuff really existed you'd be the minion of the devil.
Terra1311 2 weeks ago
Taking someones hard earned money and giving to someone who sits on their ass all day and doing nothing isn't being a society.
WILKINSTV 1 month ago
Well, TJ. Its been two years, I hope youre choking now.
InvincibleNumanist 1 month ago
LOL at jesus comes from sky and take all the good people, truth hurts...
earthlinglife 1 month ago
this guy is all over the youtube pages lol had to click it and watch it, the amazing angry atheist!
don't mess with the amazing atheist! XD
earthlinglife 1 month ago
Yay blind over-generalizations! Just what the country needs!
bigpray73 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stupidATHIESTS Even unintelligent things (athiests, for example) were designed. When a moron says that "life was designed by nature", he's admitting, in his own feeble way the same thing, only in a fairy tale fashion. But, who designed God? Nobody did. Better hide, here's something your Maker said: Revelation 1:8 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.
caravan44gm 2 months ago
I could listen to the Amazing Atheist all day.
rubbeldiekatz85 2 months ago
@rubbeldiekatz85 I just did that lolll.
MJFAN666 2 months ago
@rubbeldiekatz85 I just did.
eridanus22 1 month ago
@eridanus22 me too i just watched every video he uploaded.
NightHowlingLoneWolf 1 month ago
this is what i mean. when you read my comment on people MUST understand that if something makes them THAT angry that it is almost always something they are uncertain of or angry about in themselves. occupy wallstreet is angry as they are because they did NOT pay attention until now. they wont tell you that but its the truth.
InfiniteSpiral112358 2 months ago
Aaah You The Man. the Chocolate-Covered BANNANA MAN ..! Did you freeze the Fruit, or ae they young, and turgid
WarblesOnALot 2 months ago
Dude, I was once a fan! no more........
parkert51 2 months ago
@parkert51 And you feel the need to make it known that you were once a fan? Why? Just fuck off, no one will stop you.
TearsOfWar1 2 months ago
@TearsOfWar1 fuck off yourself bitch.....
parkert51 2 months ago
@parkert51 Did you mean to say, "Fuck yourself off, bitch!"? You mean to say I need to masterbate or something? Okay... Will do that. Good advice.
TearsOfWar1 2 months ago
@TearsOfWar1 actualy no, saying "fuck of yourself bitch" is correct grammar. You told him to fuck off and he basically said "NO U". You just got double grammar nazid, bitch.
shazzy544 1 month ago
@shazzy544 No, it's not. How can you "fuck of yourself"? Are you a fucking moron?
TearsOfWar1 1 month ago
@TearsOfWar1 nono, see, if you understood language at all, youd know he wasnt saying "Fuck yourself off", but rather "fuck off, yourself". See, it was a retort, as i have previously explained, to you saying "fuck off" to him.
shazzy544 1 month ago
@shazzy544 There was no coma in between 'off' and 'yourself', you idiot. Check your original comment if you don't believe me. I understand language just fine, moron, it's you that doesn't. Go back to English class. Or if you are currently taking that, pay attention harder.
TearsOfWar1 1 month ago
@shazzy544 Nazid? That is not a word. You need to know grammar before you can be a Grammar Nazi. Capitalize bitch because you were using it as a name and you would also have to capitalize "Nazid". "Actualy" is not a word. I think you meant actually. "Fuck of yourself bitch" is not correct grammar. It would be "Fuck off, bitch" or "Fuck you, bitch" but "Fuck of yourself bitch" is not correct grammar. The "of" is wrong and no comma is wrong. You are an idiot.
elnoraemily 1 month ago
@elnoraemily Nazid? Nazid is not a word. You need to know grammar before you can be a, Grammar Nazi. Capitalize bitch, because you were using it as a name and you would also have to capitalize, "Nazid". "Actualy" is not a word, I think you meant actually. "Fuck of yourself bitch" is not correct grammar, It would be, "Fuck off, bitch" or "Fuck you, bitch", but "Fuck of yourself bitch" is not correct grammar. The "of" is wrong and no comma is wrong. You are an idiot: Corrected commas!
XxGonixXFAN 1 month ago
@XxGonixXFAN Nice try, however, you are wrong. There should be no comma after "a" and before "Grammar Nazi". That is incorrect. Also no comma after "capitalize" and "Nazid". I do not know who taught you to put commas there, but that is not grammatically correct by any stretch. You put a comma after word, when it should either be a period (which it was) or a semicolon because it is two different sentences with no conjunction.
elnoraemily 1 month ago
@XxGonixXFAN "It would be" should not be separated by commas. There should be a period and then the "it would be" (with no comma after it, either). There should be no comma before or after the "but" because it is not joining a list and the second sentence is conjoined to the first. You attempted to do "corrected commas" but all of the corrections you attempted were false and grammatically incorrect. Do not try to correct someone if you do not know grammar. I appreciate the effort.
elnoraemily 1 month ago
@elnoraemily It's okay to be butthurt. Not everyone's grammar is good. Some people have shit for grammar and others don't. It's okay, buddy. Maybe next time you'll get it, who knows! Have a great day and stay in English class!
XxGonixXFAN 1 month ago
@XxGonixXFAN Uhm. I am not butthurt, as you so eloquent stated. Do I really have to post links to the correct use of commas? You put them in places they do not belong. You were being grammatically incorrect and trying to change a grammatically correct sentence. They do not go after random words and in the middle of sentences, which is where you tried to put them.
elnoraemily 1 month ago
@elnoraemily "They do not go after random words and in the middle of sentences, which is where you tried to put them." if that is the case, why, pray tell, does that sentance have a comma in the middle of it?
dorianleakey 4 weeks ago
@dorianleakey Am I the only person who has ever taken a grammar class? It is not in the middle. The word "Which” is a conjunction in this sentence, separating two thoughts. They are conjoined. The sentences are able to stand alone on their own. A semicolon would not be appropriate because there is a word being used to conjoin the sentences to each other. It would be a run-on sentence without the comma in place. How can the two of you not write the language you speak?
elnoraemily 4 weeks ago
@elnoraemily Also I notice you did not find anything to criticize in my post, yet you tell me I cannot write the language I speak. Basically you do not like people disagreeing with you, do you?
That is all this is about. Not grammar at all.
dorianleakey 4 weeks ago
@dorianleakey You wish to be critiqued? Your first post has two awkward conjunctions (why and pray tell) and does not flow. You did not capitalize "if" and you spelled "sentance" wrong. In your second post, "Basically" should have a comma after it. "Also" should have a comma after it. You do not need the "do you" at the end of the sentence because it is redundant with the "you do not."
elnoraemily 4 weeks ago
@elnoraemily I disagree with you on all your points and I just do not believe you.
Everything you have written is awkward to read and yet you try criticize others writing.
No matter what I write you will find it wanting, why? because I disgree with you, and all who disagree with you must be stupid, in your arrogant little mind.
Now your tone shows that you are arrogant, at least that is something you wont be able to disagree with.
Thank you for the English lesson.
dorianleakey 4 weeks ago
@dorianleakey You amuse me. The person who cannot write correctly is trying to argue syntax. Arrogant? No, I am not. I just do not like it when people butcher their language and attempt to justify their own mistakes. I find it slightly saddening when people refuse to learn. So goes life, I suppose. I hope you have a nice day.
elnoraemily 4 weeks ago
@elnoraemily I have not butchered my language, i have made slight mistakes that most educated people would happily ignore because the general feel of what I write is completely acceptable and easy to read.
You are choosing a mechanical view of language not because its important to you, or because my crimes against language are so serious but to win.You also have made mistakes even if they are typos and some of what you write does not flow well so cut others some slack.
continued
dorianleakey 4 weeks ago
@dorianleakey The vast majority of even the most educated people do not remember the details good grammar but the feel. The terminology of even the basics slips most of our minds and we even need to pause to remember the difference between a noun and a verb let alone what alone reflexive pronouns.
And its a full stop not a period, arse.
I feel stupid for getting into these pointless arguments but never mind. What it the point? why? WHY?
dorianleakey 4 weeks ago
@dorianleakey I think you take life too seriously.
elnoraemily 3 weeks ago
@elnoraemily Splllffft! that was the sound I made as I was sipping my tea when I read this.I take things too seriously, ME!
dorianleakey 3 weeks ago
@dorianleakey Yes. I have stayed the same level of calm. You, my dear, seem to be exasperated.
elnoraemily 3 weeks ago
@dorianleakey Relax, kid. Take a deep breath and relax.
elnoraemily 3 weeks ago
@elnoraemily Actually I am sorry, I should not get involved in these arguments. I do still feel you may be getting riled up and pulling grammar apart rather than arguments, ut never mind. The disagreement reminded me of a clip- that mitchell and webb look - pedants unite.
dorianleakey 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
elnoraemily 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dorianleakey In the third post, the entire first sentence is a run on and should be separated from the main point. Once again, there is an "also" without the comma after it and the entire second paragraph is cut off at a strange point. The "because" should not be there. It makes the sentences sound as though they run together. I teach, genius, which is why I know that you are completely and utterly wrong in every way about English.
elnoraemily 4 weeks ago
@dorianleakey Before another fail of the English language on your part comes up, there is a comma after sentence and before separating because that would also be a run on sentence without it. This is fourth grade level grammar, if not before. It is rather pathetic that two people could have such a misunderstanding of something this simple.
elnoraemily 4 weeks ago
@elnoraemily You have made mistakes here with a missing word and the whole thing not scanning well, that aside, I think you do not remember your grammar classes accurately.
Also you are using an argument about grammar to avoid discussing anything of substance. Because you then can keep pretending you are clever, when you are not.
dorianleakey 4 weeks ago
@dorianleakey I am clever, my dear, and I have the IQ tests to prove it. It is you who does not remember how to write this language. You, however, have made it very clear that you have never gone to college. You are truly pathetic at English and even try to be psychoanalytic. I find it disturbing that unintelligent people who can barely write try to act like they know what they are talking about, even though their grammar and poor syntax shows that they actually have no idea.
elnoraemily 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
elnoraemily 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@XxGonixXFAN Why did you put a comma before Grammar Nazi? That comma is not needed. It should not be after bitch because bitch was not being used as a name and should not be before Nazid. Having a comma before I and after word is also incorrect. It would have to be a semicolon. You need to take English or go to college. Either one.
elnoraemily 1 month ago
u need to move to britain, france or australia, mate. They aint perfect countries.....but they're better than the US
AgnosticCurry 2 months ago
?...?
4u2Chucky 3 months ago
Get a hair cut and get a real job!!!!!
Brush your teeth, comb your hair!!!!!
You are a sick puppy!!!!!
Did I mention get a real job!!!!
4u2Chucky 3 months ago
@4u2Chucky, I believe TAA despite the thought of being of any use to people he hates, which includes about 99% of them. I must say I understand him well. The world is filled to the edge by dumb fucks who hails steal and share mentality.
Idol2011no 3 months ago
*Moves to Canada for realz this time.*
EliroX904 3 months ago in playlist More videos from TheAmazingAtheist
you should be president
Arielbg 3 months ago
What a clueless dumb fuck this is. He doesn't even know fascism and socialism are closely bounded together far into the left side of politics. Both got this in common:
-Do NOT respect the individual-
If there is a premise that make sense to help locate an -ism along the poltical axis, it must be the one premise that forbid coercion against honest man.
Then you easily can place Right Anarchism at the most right followed by libertarianism. Everything else you find somewhere at the left site.
Idol2011no 3 months ago
@Idol2011no Fascism is on the right of the political spectrum you fucking idiot.
klm4298 3 months ago in playlist More videos from TheAmazingAtheist
@klm4298, no you dumb fucking retard, it isn't. Fascism and and socialism got the most important point of view in common, namely: how much does the -ism respect the choice of the individual?
Fascism and socialism both hold ideology higher than the individual. In an axiomatic system nothing else but plancing them both at the same side makes sense.
Idol2011no 3 months ago
@Idol2011no Yes, sir it is. This isn't a debate it's easily obtainable common knowledge. The naming of a political ideology has nothing to do with what it is. Just look it up.
klm4298 3 months ago
@klm4298, in fact it is a great debate and it has been on and off since last WW. When grouping different -ism, the reasonable way to do it, is by emphasize the most, what is most important to the individual, which is to be free and not coerced. Fascism, Communism, nazism, liberalism, socialism, got the most important thing in common: They do not respect the individual's freedom, but raise ideology above humans. It makes perfect sense to place them all at the shitty left side: axiomatic devide.
Idol2011no 3 months ago
@Idol2011no
"Then you easily can place Right Anarchism at the most right followed by libertarianism. Everything else you find somewhere at the left site."
You're talking about Authoritarianism vs. Libertarianism, only one of many axes by which a political movement can be examined (and by no means the "most important"). It is NOT to be confused with the Left-Right axis, which generally measures social and fiscal responsibilities of the apparatus chosen on the Authoritarian-Libertarian axis.
SocialistCatgirl 2 months ago
@Idol2011no
For example, the Fascist regime of Germany employed an extraordinarily autocratic system, represented by a very high Authoritarian score. Meanwhile, their social and fiscal policies were a distinct mixture of Left and Right, resulting in a fairly Centrist movement.
Compare this to the CCCP. They too had a strongly Authoritarian apparatus (especially under Stalin), but the social rhetoric and redistributive economics were hard to the Left.
SocialistCatgirl 2 months ago
@SocialistCatgirl, it's meaningless to devide liberty into personal and economical freedom. Only extremly dumb fucks do that. What my hand do/produce is only an extention to my hand.
There are only two kinds of people. They who respect the individual and they who do not. The latter may die by force. In reasonable sense (not to be confused by legitimate) they lack right to live. The only reason they still exist is because they still are to many. We will soon solve this problem.
Idol2011no 2 months ago
@Idol2011no
"The only reason they still exist is because they still are to many. We will soon solve this problem."
Okay, honey. You've just said that your political enemies don't have the right to live, and that it is perfectly acceptable to kill them. In fact, you go on to say that the only reason you haven't already tried is because there are just too many of them. In academic circles we call such a thing a genocide.
You're closer to being a swastika-swinger than I am.
SocialistCatgirl 2 months ago
@SocialistCatgirl wrote: "In academic circles we call such a thing a genocide."
No, we don't. Such a name imply the killings are not justified, which is far from the truth. Even in the eyes of people who hail steal and share mentality there is a consensus of using all necessary means to halt coercion. They have only extended it with an exeption for themself, which only makes their point of view into a contradiction. Thus, we can ignore the exeption, and then kill'em all by their own standard.
Idol2011no 2 months ago
@Idol2011no
There is no qualifier regarding "justified killing" in the definition of genocide.
Here's a hypothetical for you: a large group of non-Libertarians decides that Libertarians don't deserve to live. They all decide to grab guns, converge on your house, and shoot you dead in front of your wife and children. They then ask your wife if she's a Libertarian. She says yes, and is promptly shot in the head. The kids are taken to a political re-education camp.
What would you call this?
SocialistCatgirl 2 months ago
@SocialistCatgirl: "There is no qualifier regarding..."
Yes, there is. Without it, it would be impossible to think of genocide as something unwanted.
"What would you call this?"
Murder. When killing a person hailing steal and share mentality I call it a wanted kill.
Your (pato)logic(al) problem consists of unability to distinguish between two incompatible examples. You need to learn to differ between attack and defense in context of, to kill. One is murder. The other is not.
Idol2011no 2 months ago
@Idol2011no
KILLING IN SELF DEFENSE?!! Are you out of your fucking MIND? You're telling me that if you reversed the roles and busted into my house, asked me if I am anything other than a Libertarian or a Right Anarchist, I said yes, and you shot me, you'd be ACTING IN SELF DEFENSE? That the systematic killing of anyone other than Libertarians and Right Anarchists is not genocide, but a justified war?
And you don't see a parallel between Hitler and yourself? Stalin, Mao, and yourself? Fuck off!
SocialistCatgirl 2 months ago
@SocialistCatgirl wrote: "ACTING IN SELF DEFENSE?"
Correct.
"And you don't see a parallel between Hitler and yourself?
When it comes to want to kill alot of people, yes. When it comes to choose reasonable, no.
Hitler and Stalin are close to your doctrine. Like them, you're unable to live without wanting to coerce. That's your logical problem when it comes to using your brain to think reason with. Probably also a pathological problem. You deserve to die, but not without months of pain.
Idol2011no 2 months ago
@Idol2011no
The FBI should be monitoring your internet activity, phone conversations, and interviewing your friends on polygraph. You're a fucking terrorist in the making, a damned Timothy McVeigh wannabe. In fact, I have half a mind to INFORM them about you. Watch what you say and do for the rest of your life, they'll be watching. Don't be shocked if a unit in body armor smashes your door down one day.
SocialistCatgirl 2 months ago
@SocialistCatgirl, Britannica, terrorism: "the systematic use of violence to create a general climate of fear in a population and thereby to bring about a particular political objective"
I cannot think of a better way to get rid of steal and share mentality. There is no sign to accomplish this without blood flow, coarse feed in the streets. Many socialists and other kids of psychopaths are unable to think of a life without wanting to steal from others. They understand only violence and death.
Idol2011no 2 months ago
@Idol2011no
You think it's appropriate to kill your political enemies, indeed you think it's necessary to do so rather than trying your hand at democratic opposition. You view terrorism as a practical route to your ends, even a preferable one. You disregard the humanity of all who are not like you, arguing that they're lesser beings who aren't worthy of life and are incapable of reason.
If you're trolling, I strongly recommend you drop the Fascist bullshit. It's going to get you arrested.
SocialistCatgirl 2 months ago
@SocialistCatgirl, whether or not they are political enemies is irrelevant, you extremly dumb fuck. How many times must I explain the killings are motivated by coercion directed against me? Where do they grow retards like you, unable to use brain to think reason with?
Idol2011no 2 months ago
@Idol2011no
"How many times must I explain the killings are motivated by coercion directed against me?"
You know, most genocidal maniacs make the argument that they're acting in self-defense and for the good of all. Hitler said that the Jews were keeping the German people down. Osama Bin Laden says that Americans are keeping Middle Eastern Muslims down. The Hutu in Rwanda said that the Tutsi were all universally a threat to stability and spies for a rebel faction.
Interesting company to keep.
SocialistCatgirl 2 months ago
@SocialistCatgirl, Yes, many have falsely claimed to be supressed, but where this has not been true. Moreover, many have truthfully been suppressed and claimed to be so. It includes people who have lived under the emperors and sultans, kings and queens. Social Democracy and Tsars. You do not have with reason been able to justify why I belong to the group who lie about being supressed. In fact, you have shown that your power of argumentation levels with kids in kindergarden. You're a dumb fuck.
Idol2011no 2 months ago
@Idol2011no
You know what REALLY sickens me about your argument? There are GENUINE human rights abuses by third world dictators, and you're here crying and screaming about the "steal and share" of having to pay taxes and obey civic laws. No one busts your door down and steals your children to fill the ranks of a child army. No one kills you if you speak up about your opinion on tax codes or if you vote against the majority party. You're not in a work camp.
You have NOTHING to complain about.
SocialistCatgirl 2 months ago
@SocialistCatgirl, yes, there are people more supressed than me, but this fact doesn't remove supression directed against me. If your text shall be read as if a reasonable human did write it, your fallacious appeal to people under greater supression must mean that you in fact realise that I in fact am supressed by your psychopathic kind of thinking. Maybe there is still hope to help your brain to think reasonable with. Why don't you give it a try, stupid?.
Idol2011no 2 months ago
@Idol2011no
You have free speech. You have the right to assemble. You can worship as you wish (or not at all). You have the right to redress your grievances with your representatives. You have the right to VOTE for your representatives in free and fair elections. You have the right to free press. You have the right to bear arms. You have the right to a fair trial and representation at said trial. You cannot be arrested without committing a crime or conspiring to.
Exactly HOW are you repressed?
SocialistCatgirl 2 months ago
@SocialistCatgirl, yes, you're right. I am given right to choose my master. Thanks for pointing out something that serves to clearify my point. How old are you?
Idol2011no 2 months ago
@Idol2011no
Old enough to know that you haven't made a SINGLE specific complaint yet. All you've done is made nebulous claims about being repressed without ever saying how. It's all:
"Blah blah blah, let's kill everyone but the Anarchists and Libertarians, blah blah blah, anyone who questions me is stupid, blah blah blah, terrorism is okay as long as I'm the terrorist, blah blah blah, government is slavery, blah blah blah."
Go live in the fucking woods as a hermit if you hate society so much.
SocialistCatgirl 2 months ago
@SocialistCatgirl, no, dumb fuck you are. Terrorism is perfectly okay to fight initiated coercion. Who is the terrorist is not relevant. She The Socialist Dumb Fuck Understands It Soon, if I only write it many enough times. Terrorism is perfectly okay to fight initiating coercion. Who is the terrorist is not relevant. She The Socialist Dumb Fuck Understands It Soon, if I only write it many enough times. Terrorism is perfectly okay to fight initiating coercion. Is it fun to be a dumb fuck?
Idol2011no 2 months ago
@Idol2011no
You're just a little bitch trying to piss people off so you can troll them, and you're too fucking stupid to realize that if you take on the identity of a Timothy McVeigh wannabe and say you want to kill almost everyone in America (in a public forum, no less) the Dept. of Homeland Security and the FBI are going to raise an eyebrow each. You're too fucking stupid to even realize that they're probably watching you RIGHT NOW.
You're on the road to Guantanamo and don't even realize it.
SocialistCatgirl 2 months ago
@Idol2011no
You deserve it, by the way. A clearer case of probable cause cannot be found. And if you are a terrorist (which I seriously doubt), then you're DEFINITELY not the leader. You're TOTALLY bullet-bait material, since you can't reason your way out of a fucking paper bag.
"Duhhh....I are oppressed. Me no can explain how in detail, but I are oppressed. You not buleev me becuz I not tell you how I oppressed? You stoopid. Me should kill you. You is oppressor two."
Have fun in Cuba!
SocialistCatgirl 2 months ago
@SocialistCatgirl, from the very start in this conversation I've been talking about the "steal and share- mentality" that is taken place all around the world in all the governments and still you need to get spelled out exactly what theft I'm refering to. You must be the dumbest fuck ever.
Why should I be afraid to tell I want to slay all human beings who support steal and share- mentality? I'm telling the truth and do only support necessary means to get rid of it: systematic mass killings.
Idol2011no 2 months ago
@Idol2011no
You need to define what the fuck the "steal and share" mentality IS, you idiot. Is it taxation in general, or is it a certain application of tax revenue? Is it delivery of social welfare programs alone, or is it also construction and maintenance of public infrastructure? Would government-funded medical research fall under "steal and share"? SAY. WHAT. YOU. WOULD. CHANGE. DAMN. IT.
You have exactly ONE comment to start making a case before I tell you where to shove it.
SocialistCatgirl 2 months ago
@SocialistCatgirl, no, dumb fuck. expressions are not defined. Only words. Steal is to take from another what belongs to another without his consent. Now go figure what I can mean by "steal and share- mentality", dumb fuck.
Idol2011no 2 months ago
@Idol2011no
Everyone, let the record show that I gave this man ample opportunities to make a compelling argument for his side. He consistently refused to do so, instead resorting to a storm of ad hominem attacks. At no point in his babbling argument about genocide being justified because he is coerced did he EVER explain HOW he is coerced, which I take as evidence that he is NOT coerced at all and simply cannot construct even a FICTIONAL case for himself.
Idol, shove your argument up your ass.
SocialistCatgirl 2 months ago
@SocialistCatgirl, I didn't think this dumb fucking gal would be able to connect the dots from my definition. Nor did I believe she would make a honest try. She's a socialist.
I just saw an interesting movie that gave me hope it would be possible in the future to grow a deadly (painful too) virus to whom only socialists are not immune.
Idol2011no 2 months ago
@Idol2011no
Marked you as spam, troll. Go ahead, comment again. I'll mark you as spam again without a response. I can do this as long as you like.
SocialistCatgirl 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SocialistCatgirl, ok, Extremely Dumb Fuck.
Idol2011no 2 months ago
@Idol2011no
And by the way, you bushwackin', shit-kickin', gun totin' piece of shit: the word is "pathological". And so you can use it PROPERLY next time, the term pertains to diseases and deviations from social norms. For inanimate objects, it refers to deviation from an expected norm.
Also, "unability"? IT'S "INABILITY" DAMN YOU!
A retarded motherfucker like YOU is trying to take control of the globe? Yeah, you'd pretty much HAVE to kill all the smart people for THAT to happen.
SocialistCatgirl 2 months ago
@Idol2011no
Because it sounds to ME like you would call it good politics. After all, you're calling for the systemic murder of all YOUR political opponents, guffawing that they don't deserve to live anyway. You're protecting people from being coerced by...coercing them with murder and force.
SocialistCatgirl 2 months ago
CHEESUS?5:52
TheBooBSTUDIO 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lol he makes money off these vids...good job mate
JRGamingInc 3 months ago
this loud, fat homosexual is quite hilariously pathetic and retarded
colouredbills 4 months ago
Comment removed
danimal6098 4 months ago
Comment removed
danimal6098 4 months ago
@colouredbills this wonderfully cliched troll is projecting his faults onto others
Bernstein1917 3 months ago
@colouredbills: You think a lot about homosexuals, don't you sweetie? :)
Trampadoo 3 months ago
GLUTTONOUS HOMOSEXUAL
colouredbills 4 months ago
@colouredbills lol someone is a homofobe
theswedishdude1 3 months ago
You're so full of crap dude.
deviferr 4 months ago
Oooooh, guess you showed me.
lima33ful 4 months ago
So you want to throw a hand grenade in their midst. and they are a a violant mob? You are remarkably stupid.
lima33ful 4 months ago
@lima33ful Yes you are.
LCxCZ 4 months ago
@lima33ful Words cant describe how retarded the statement you just did is
CoHReplaysHD 4 months ago
@CoHReplaysHD I would assume that is because you are incapable of using more than monosyllable words.
lima33ful 4 months ago
@lima33ful Its pathetic how you try to act like if you were Sokrates. What he said was that he wished they would shut up, not literally kill them. Stop trying to point out blemishes, its just really annoying.
CoHReplaysHD 4 months ago
@CoHReplaysHD No, he said that he wished he had a grenade that he could throw in their midst. That I believe is violent. He's a hypocrite moron. By the way it's "Socrates".
lima33ful 4 months ago
@lima33ful Its Σωκράτης (Sōkrátēs), and I dont think he really would throw a hand grenade in a mob of people, it is just a simile.
CoHReplaysHD 4 months ago
@CoHReplaysHD No, I believe it reflects the real mindset of the left. Violence is fine as long as it is directed at someone who disagrees with them. Not that he would have the slightest idea of how to use a grenade. BTW in English, the lanquage we're speaking right now, it's Socrates. But don't worry, I'm ever so impressed by your use of his native tongue.
lima33ful 4 months ago
@lima33ful No sorry im from Sweden, we say Sokrates, mixed them up :P
CoHReplaysHD 4 months ago
@CoHReplaysHD I see, I am sorry as well. A simple misunderstanding.
lima33ful 4 months ago
Comment removed
danimal6098 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lima33ful He was purposely exaggerating to illustrate how mad he was. You can figure that out by the context it was said in. It's called figurative language. You must be a drag to be around since you take everything literally.
danimal6098 4 months ago
Comment removed
ichigo787 3 months ago
rofl i agree with you 100% regarding his comment..
ichigo787 3 months ago
lolololol that lost couple of minutes had me rollin hahaha
andres65080 4 months ago
i hate obama america is in debt hmmm i wonder why?..... maybe because we keep giving other countries fucking money help america first then others also these laws are getting fucking stupid
jeremythellama1 4 months ago
@jeremythellama1 lolwut?
SamIsATotalBeast 4 months ago
@SamIsATotalBeast basically america is in debt and obama is wandering why the reason why is because we are giving all of our money to other countries that probably dont need it
jeremythellama1 4 months ago
@jeremythellama1 We're in debt for a LOT of reasons and giving money away to other countries is definately not a contributing factor.
SamIsATotalBeast 4 months ago
@jeremythellama1
Obama was NOT the cause of our debt. We've been in debt for a good long time
neowilliams 4 months ago
jack nicholson
SunStrokeCactus 5 months ago
this is so sectarian. all these massive plural "you's" and "we's" hurt to listen to
honestly man turn off CNN and turn on your thinking cap
do you REALLY believe all of the people who voted for push share all these conceptions and morals youre listing, you beleive them same applies to those who voted for obama ??
oh and..obama = the same
although this video is 3 years old you probably clued into that by now.. i hope
pa1nted 5 months ago
@pa1nted
2 years.. learn to count.
XxBrandonBaileyxX 5 months ago
There is no conservative people & liberal people. The true conservatives (& liberals) aren't out there protesting. Honestly, I've been there: most of those people only protest because it's trendy & is in line with what they think they believe. Everyone should be required to take a political philosophy class... at least.
molitovguardian 6 months ago
Both Republicans and Democrats should agree on one thing. Let us not let any ruler lile Bush or Obama take our freedom. We need to remember that eventhough it is not good to have all of this in fighting amoung the parties it is good in that it is good for us not to develop Herd mentality like other factious communist countries have had where there is only one party in control of the police state.
RichGonzalezVerona 6 months ago
you want the truth it is simple they do not like him because he is black that is why they will never let people like Herman Caine run
johndebbra 6 months ago
@Zephyesa um i dont think people come to the beach to hear you read the bible. And it isnt very calming and peacful what with its hate, rape, murder, worldwide floods, destruction of cities and anilmal sacrife. Thats at least what i noticed when i read it
GothLemmon 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Amazing Athiest you are at the gates of hell, that anger in you is the heat of Satans fire on your face, follow Jesus instead and you will cool off quickly and feel much better about everything and peaceful inside, I like to read the Bible on the beach and I feel great, and I also know that all the other people on the beach have come there, for me to read my Bible to them.
Zephyesa 6 months ago
Comment removed
1tacoman17 7 months ago
ಠ‿ಠ Conservatives...
gimme a machete!
Jokerprodution 7 months ago
so powerful. well said
jellytroid 7 months ago
"You want this! You need this! Eat this! Don't smoke! Don't think! This is truth! Now regurgitate! And Obey! Keep in order! Fall in line! We are in control for you!"- Media and government relations. Your children are constantly exposed to these messages, but you don't know that because you are too and so am I.
Revolution2pointO 7 months ago
This is great.
PsychoticEarwig 7 months ago
This guy speaks only the truth...
TheArchon427 8 months ago
Wooot freedom to imbibe and inject any substances I want into my own body!! :D
TeamWork187 8 months ago
@givewarachance17 you blithering flipping moron! He was talking about ABORTION! Being gay is not a "reproductive right" how do you posess the brain capacity to breathe?
Eyesareopen22 8 months ago
4:10 There is no "reproductive freedom" that conservatives are against, because gays cannot reproduce. Conservatives are against gay marriage BECAUSE they cannot reproduce...Not exactly, but you get what I'm trying to say.
givewarachance117 8 months ago
Lincoln killed the writ of habeus corpus...And he probably saved the war.
givewarachance117 8 months ago
people who argue through comments on a video are fucking dumb. hands down
MrMacDarra 8 months ago
@MrMacDarra You're wrong
AbsoluteZ3R0 8 months ago
Comment removed
MrMacDarra 8 months ago
@MrMacDarra so if you argue on youtube you like men and are homosexual... your logic and absoloutly sain.
Jokerprodution 8 months ago
I was waiting for that line all episode: "You can't handle the truth."
Dawnbringerify 9 months ago
First they came for the rich, then they came for the tea party conservatives, then they came for the Christians, then they came for the Democrats/Atheists/Teachers/Union members. Then the only ones left not in the Gulag was the Satanic Socialists like you! What a sad end to the world. Bunch of lost dark souls with no God, No Country, No clue!
danielnordeen 9 months ago
@kitkat462 You obviously didn't learn much in school did you?
egcroan 9 months ago
Consider the source... this clown is the product of todays Socialist / Liberal leaning education system. There have been people like this indoctrinating vulnerable minds forever it seems. People need to hear both sides of an argument and make their own decisions. Until there are an equal amount of Liberal Teachers to Conservative Teachers this will be the result. Carl Marx would be proud of this wacky individual. lol
Rockonrick51 9 months ago
@Rockonrick51Unfortunately since most conservatives are too stupid to be teachers the system has unfortunately more liberal teachers. I also echo his feeling that you are an ignorant moron using the term "Socialist" without understanding it because you god's on Fox News have told you how to think. I also see you didn't debate any of his points, and also resorted to a personal attack. I see again and again you morons have to resort to personal attacks because you are too stupid to debate.
egcroan 9 months ago
@Rockonrick51 Makes no sense. There should be no equal ratio of liberal and conservative teachers. There should be no teaching of opinions in school. Teachers should teach what's on the agenda, not what they believe is right. The teachers need to teach what people believe, but they SHOULDN'T teach what they want the kids to think is right.
MrLPmankidthing 8 months ago
I find this rather amusing if nothing else haha. Hey man why don't you get a few facts and come back and try again haha. I don't know where you get this notion that republicans think curing sick people is evil....... That's news to me haha. Especially seeing as how my dad is a republican and a DOCTOR! haha. Verry funny......... He thinks curing people is evil yet he spends 13+ hours a day doing just that haha. Sorry buddy but I think your the one who can't handle "the truth"
sc91084 9 months ago
@sc91084 Yeah you father probably is part of the health care system that overcharges for really poor care that is trying to be fixed by the "Affordable Health Care Act" all you children of privilege have called "Obamacare" well here's some facts for you the average cost of health care has gone up in cost due to greedy bastards like your dad to a level that most average American's can't afford.
egcroan 9 months ago
@egcroan Typical liberal. You whine when others make personal attacks on you or your fellow liberals, but you jump at the chance to attack total strangers. You don't know the first thing about me OR my father, and clearly nothing about doctors. DOCTORS DONT SET THE PRICE YOU IGNORAMUS! My so called creedy father (which he's not) would be the first to say something needs to be done but NOT Obamacare. my father works 13+ hr days just to try and make his office run because oh gee....medicare
sc91084 9 months ago
@sc91084 Give me a fucking break your father by no means works those kinds of hours and most Doctors make $200K a year so please spare me your dribble.
egcroan 8 months ago
@sc91084 Typical liberal just shows you have no mind for yourself, and are most likely the mindless morons who think Glen Beck is serious. he is just playing a role, and most of fox News guys are of stirring up hatred to keep us focused on each other rather than the rich bastards who are ruining this country. Doctor's don't set the price ?? who does then ?? whose the ignoramus now, how can you even say such a stupid thing. I am an independent, and used to be considered a conservative.
egcroan 8 months ago