Call of Duty 4 Death from Above - Spectre Gunship

[Nickitator]

U.S.A's big, and yes, they might take a little here and there. Fuck that, they are the only Damn thing in the world preventing crazy-ass fools to launch nuclear-armed missils all over the world! D: Youtube Comments = Lol-fest. Guys, seriously, grab yourselves by the collar. The world will not improve with childish, yet formal, acts of communication on some website. Get out there, fight for the world, help the world, aid the ones in need, bolster your own ressources first though! Yours Truly - N!

[BorkaBonum]

@Nickitator

That's not very accurate. How US is the reason why there haven't been any executed Nuclear orgies yet (despite the fact the US was first to develop and use them)? The entire world is set up into alliances, factions, if Kim Jong II would go nuke some country there'd be atleast one Nuclear-armed country to counter-strike. And nobody wants a third world war, but nobody wants to make themselves "defenseless" by trashing their expensive nuclear stockpile.

[skatedistrict238]

i played this and it is sooo much fun!!!

[Joea6231]

Dogmeat is right. The military is currently liberating Iraq from it's crappy government. Why don't you stop acting like you know everything about the American military when you obviously don't. Watch the military channel, if you get it. You probably don't, though.

[BorkaBonum]

@Joea6231 Ah ha ha. The (American) military is "liberating" Iraq from it's own independence in a fascistic act to force a hollow term of Democracy upon them. How noble.

And lordy, you expect me to watch the "Military Channel" fueled by American republican propaganda as a sense of objective information? You guys are hilarous.

[Korbs21]

@BorkaBonum

mw2 is my first cod, and hey captain price is here too!! :D

[Dogmeat1950]

@Joea6231, he lives in Sweden. and he thinks the military channel is a republican channel rofl. YEP. the Euro news has gotten to him lol.

dumb ass the Military channel is part of the Discovery channel and holds not political views. also the military channel talks about military history/current events not just U.S either kid just stop talking. you clearly have no idea what your talking about.

[BorkaBonum]

@Dogmeat1950 I'm not basing my opinion on any news channel. Military Channel is most reasonably funded by republican interests as their politics is so pro-war so naturally there's a connection somewhere if it flags with stated American interests.

Military Channel out of what you've described doesn't sound too unbiased to me since it only portraits the muscles behind the failing minds.

[Joea6231]

Dogmeat1950 is right. The military is liberating Iraq from it's crappy government. Watch the military channel before you act like you know anything about our military.

[BorkaBonum]

@Joea6231

Liberate Iraq from a crappy government by leeching off their resources, putting a sticker that says "democracy" on their seat of government and dictating the direction the country is supposed to go is not liberation - it's all-out fascism and political- and military oppression.

And I'm supposed to rely on American sources to get an idea of your military? Like there is any mystery to an meat-grinder sending in youngsters to die for nothing.

[Dogmeat1950]

leeching of their Resources? um they make a hell of a lot of money from the USA buy selling there oil. not really leeching off a country when your putting more money into it then your getting back.

god you need help. also the Iraq war is pretty over for the USA, don't even do street patrols any more. Iraqi military does it's own thing now.

[BorkaBonum]

@Dogmeat1950

America is still in control of the most oil deposits in the region and is still dictating the direction the resources are going.

I don't need help - I'm the one having a healthy idea of how the world works. War never brings anything but destruction. You can't go to war to bring a loose term democracy, as that would be fascism. And the war in Iraq was over before it started as it was as unprovocated as the Vietnam war and was just as constructive.

[Dogmeat1950]

the USA is not in charge of there oil they run there oil oil. if we wherein charge we would have lower gas prices not higher!!!

[GoLD3nsQuADr0n1]

It's an Ac 130

[mrsirify]

Ok, So lets asume that NAZI Germany Defeated England and the Soviet Union, First it would have to get her troops over hear. plus you have to remember that Hitlers army was only 7 million strong, he could only draw troops out of ~60 million people (counting women, children, and elderly) If somehow he crossed the atlantic ocean, and landed on our coast. We has 1. a population of 130,879,718 people 2. We has axcess to moore nature reasourses 3. We had the atomic Bomb.

[BorkaBonum]

Do you really think transportation by either German or Japanese forces would be any concern over sea?

And you have to remember America stood hopelessly underpowered throughout the first and second world war. Germany had significantly better trained troops with War Experience, military hardware that was simply putting anything America had in stock to shame, modern tactics, tanks, aircraft and subs. If Nazi forces would have made landfall on the US, America would have falled instantly.

[mrsirify]

If Nazi Germany landed hear we would have a proublm. What I trying to say, is they would have to atack from open sea. We would have a major upper hand. The only reason normady was a sucess was we based it off the UK. In other words we had time to A) refule B) gather our troops. If Nazi forces attacked they would have had to come from opean sea. Where they would have a major disadvantage.

[BorkaBonum]

@mrsirify They would have an disadvantage, but assuming they based their attack relatively early in the war they could easily have mounted a more noticable force alongside with the Japanese.

Another reason why American forces were relatively successful by Normandy was also due to the lack of proper German military resources to spare.

[mrsirify]

Germany wasn't a navel power. The US was. The US had 22 aircraft carriers - germany 0. the US had 8 battleships; germany had 2. Cruisers the US had 48; germany had 0. Destroyers US 349; Germany 17. Convery escorts 420; Germany 23. What this is saying is that Hitler never invested in navel warfare. All he did was build submarines (Not very useful for hauling troops & airplanes) What the US had was a huge fleet. We had the biggest back then. What i am saying is that Germany couldn't reach hear.

[BorkaBonum]

@mrsirify They could. You still ignore the Japanese and how a navy can be constructed if deemed necessary.

[mrsirify]

Ok the Japanese, their navy was ass-kicked by ours. They only had 6 air craft carriers, 10 battleships, 38 cruisers, 108 destroyers, and only 1175 fighter aircraft. Yep their navy was strong. But ours was stronger. Do you know how long it takes to build a battleship. It takes on avrage 2 years to build 1 battleship. While germany would have to take time to build its Navy, we already had the strongest Navy in the world. And Japan? they were more interested in Asia then the United States.

[BorkaBonum]

@mrsirify Japan is a part of Asia. Japan was more interested in fighting the Chinese.

Combine the Japanese navy with the consistent threat of the German subs and it wouldn't matter if we talked about one or a hundered air craft carriers. Especially not when the Japanese was a long way when it comes to torpedos and alternative offensive tactics from the air.

[mrsirify]

Ok so the Japanese Torpedos - They lost. We were fighting two wars, and they lost. The German Subs they went a womping 7.6 knots. A simple zigzag tactict would, and did elimate the threat from the U-boats. (in contrast Destroyers go almost 40 knots.)

[BorkaBonum]

@mrsirify Lost becuase of the Americans were desperate enough to use the atomic bomb.

[mrsirify]

We weren't desperate enough. They were all but beat. They were surrounded. We didn't want to sacrifice thousands of troops and million of civilians. (And Billions of Dollars) we simply used the Atomic weapon - true it sacrificed thousands. But compared to an all out invasion. Which would you pick, million of Thousands? Its your choice.

[BorkaBonum]

@mrsirify People are still born with defects and there's still counting civilian casulties in Hiroshima and and Nagasaki from radiation.

And that's also the problem with the American justification of the abusive use of the Atomic bomb "to save lives" since America was still the biggest coward in the whole war - sitting the entire war out, joining in the last minute, afraid of using any resources in the war and still claims to have "Won the War"?

[mrsirify]

And what i said about the population is that, America had more people to draw troop from; she also had more people to build suplies for those troops.

2) At the start of the war USA was pretie pitiful, but she soon caught up so to speak. In 1942 she was produced aprx. 47,000 aircraft. While Germany and Japan produced aprx. 25,000. We just had, at the very least, the raw numbers, and manpower to hold the AXIS off.

Sorce -The Library of Congress World War II companion- PG 202

[BorkaBonum]

@mrsirify Raw numbers doesn't mean that amazingly much since German forces were both overall better equipped and trained - we're talking like a German leap in military hardware decades ahead of mostly any other nation on the planet talking about the infantry and armored weapons.

Germany didn't have it, in the big whole, amazingly easy in the major parts of the second world war out of sheer numbers exclusively but a combination of cutting-edge equipment and tactics.

[mrsirify]

It dosn't mater how beter equiped they were. We had more then duble their population. And as the numbers stated - we had almost twice their manufacuring capacity. Take the sherman take - it ran on a gas engine. Therefor, it exploded when hit. They took on the far suppior Panzer 4s and The dreaded "King Tiger" tanks. And WON! So if germany realy wanted to attack us. And if they sent all her fleet. We would have almost 50,000 aircraft waiting for them. In other worlds we out number them 2 to 1.

[BorkaBonum]

@mrsirify The Sherman tank could basicly be driven over by any modern German tanks. You also fail to comprehend how the P2 Tiger's reactive armor basicly made it hopeless for any Sherman tanks to even think of attacking it. So if they by sheer numbers took down a P2 or two, big deal.

Russians outnumbered German forces by infinity to one - and they managed to hold out exclusively due to the harsh weather and Hitler's unwill to resupply them. Two to One is still odds in German's favor.

[mrsirify]

The germans only build ~560 Tiger II tanks. An impressive number. For a country surounded on all sides. But the United States had over 40,000 M4 Shermans. Meaning we outnumbered them almost 10 to 1. So i would love to see a tiger tank stand up to that kind of fire power.

[BorkaBonum]

@mrsirify I strongly doubt America ever had 40,000 Sherman tanks in the war - 40,000 produced is one thing, as it was all about selling hardware to the UK.

[mrsirify]

sherman tanks were produced 1941-1945 the were used through 1950. But we still had them in the war.

[Dogmeat1950]

mrsirify Israel used Shermans in the 6 day war. 1968

[paulf93]

a sherman of that time was very weak

the gun on a sherman wasnt as powerful as an 88mm tiger shell

the tiger ws also much more well armoured

[frizznumbertwo]

i completely agree america are ment to be the hard nut of the world but any war they won we were involved and every war on there own was they lost misaribly no afence to viatnam people but at the time they were just simple soldiers with ak's and pistols and you had SAWs (early versions) m4s deagles and rpgs ect. ur army realy is the worst of the worst on the statigic side of life

[BorkaBonum]

America aren't ment to be the hard nut, but they go out and try to act World Police despite their own miserable problems state-sida such as homicide, school shootings, violence by- and against policemen, poor educational system and probably the worst healthcare system (as of before Obama at any rate) in any industrial country on the planet.

And yeah, in Vietnam the American military outdid itself... The Iraq "war" is basicly as failed, with time the truth always turns out.

[MidgardEagle]

Maybe comments should be locked for this video. High number of trolls and little kids fighting here even for YT.

[BorkaBonum]

I poked in Approval for comments just now. I wanted to disable comments altogether but that would remove all current comments - which seems a bit excessive.

[clustro]

uhh it says right on profile. "Country: Germany."

Yeah, we'd be eaten sauerkraut keep deluding yourself. You sound almost unhappy that you lost.

Didn't throw enough Jews in the oven?

[BorkaBonum]

clustro, it's not about Germany loosing. It's about America not winning.

The Second World War was caused by the Allies "Versailles preace treaty" - and I find it hard to win a war you brought on yourself. And it's easy being cocky when you had no real losses, especially when America was spared any attacks from the superior German or Japanese Army - America entered the war in the last minute and had success only thanks to the Russian turnaround in Stalingrad.

[clustro]

Uhh

We entered it at the "last minute?" It ended quickly BECAUSE WE FREAKIN WON IT.

The superior German Army? After being routed at Normandy and the Ardennes? Please.

The Japanese Army was strong yes, but their taboo against smart retreat and the route at Midway was the end for them.

And if you knew how to read, you would know that Woodrow Wilson fought against the harsh provisions of the Versailles treaty.

But despite how harsh the Versailles Treaty was, was Nazism the answer?

[BorkaBonum]

Know your history. At the time the Second World War started America barely even had a military to speak of, and German weapon engineering was centuries ahead of its time, still today setting the bar for todays weapon systems and still serving with a few cosmetic tune-ups over the years.

America entered the war when Germany was basicly dried out and after Hitler met his first match in the war; in Stalingrad.

[BorkaBonum]

Germany was Starving as a result of the Versailles Treaty - it killed the German economy completely. Hitler took the power and turned Germany back on its feet and over the course of only a few years made room for the best military hardware and tactics at the time.

Whatever Woodrow argued against, America still signed the treaty as part of the Alliance.

Nazism was the answer of the Alliance crimes against Germany - and Hitler still saved Germany from starving, maybe even to this day.

[clustro]

where do you get that we're losing in iraq and afghanistan

can you even fuckin read?

we won in iraq. war's done. we're pulling out and letting the iraqis deal with it.

afghanistan will be dealt with in due time.

and where the fuck do you get off putting the USA down you ungrateful kraut motherfucker? what would happen to you if we pulled out all our defenses out of western Europe? you petty, squabbling Europeans are going to face the Russians alone? don't make me laugh.

fucking pathetic.

[BorkaBonum]

America was sitting pretty during the majority of the first and second world war. I wouldn't call that very noble, leeching on Europes so-so performance while buffing your own military from zero and jumping to the war in the last minute, fighting war-tired German conscripts.

American pressence in the Middle East is an absolute abomination - it serves no purpose trying to teach democracy by fascism while your own country is politically and culturally in ruins since the start of it.

[clustro]

how the fuck is our country in ruins?

you fucking germans don't know anything about anything except how to start shit you can't win.

[BorkaBonum]

God - learn how to comprehend before arguing. America is culturally and politically in ruins, it's a metaphor.

I'm not German. You don't need to be German to understand the course of history with a sense of objectivity. But it seems like you need to be American to insist someone who cowardly waited the entire war only to chip in the last minute, could have won it.

America is the one starting shit they can't win. Vietnam, Iraq, Afganistan, etc. All miserably fiascos.

[mrsirify]

America isn't use to the "Hit And Run" tatctics used by the talaban, and the Viet Con. All of our thousands of troops, billions of dollars in defence spending, and advanced techonlogy, just wasn't designed for an enemy as down to earth as the Talaban. Iraq is won, "OPERATION: IRAQI FREEDOM" is a sucess, they now have the betufil gift of democrazy, we in the westeran countries just take it for granted. We don't have to worry about being shot for voicing our political views.(as proven by this page

[BorkaBonum]

Iraq is a happy democracy now? That's news. Iran is also a democracy on the paper - but that doesn't mean the elections are democratic. And a democracy without democratic elections isn't a democracy worth speaking of.

America is fascists for forcing foreign countries to applying a shallow term of democracy. Politics are worth nothing when politics has no power, as little as the people, when a foreign force is in the country poiting it where to go and leeching on their resources.

[paulf93]

america invaded the wrong county

operation iraqi freedom was a cover up operation to avoid america looking stupid

[Dogmeat1950]

stfu. we got rid of a dictator who killed thousands of his own ppl. ppl seem to live Sadam.

[BorkaBonum]

@Dogmeat1950 American forces has killed a unspecific number of civilians - from hundereds to thousands, leeching on the Iraqi oil resources, occupying the country with military and political influences.

Saddam might be gone, but the fascism is there none the less. So well done doing nothing.

[Dogmeat1950]

@BorkaBonum, kid you really don't know that much about the real world other then what you play in games or see on TV.

85% of Civy deaths in Iraq where caused by Insergents and radical groups.

the Allied forces there do there best to try and avoid killing Civys it's not that fucking easy either.

Iraq has a democracy now. also Iraq makes more money on it's oil then the USA does.

by the way kid, the Iraq war is damn near over. so stick to playing games and being a Lazy ass.

[BorkaBonum]

@Dogmeat1950

85% of Civilian deaths under what circumstances and what is your source and for what time period?

"Allied" forces are occupying Iraq based on a false claim of the country having nuclear warheads. When proven wrong the war was condemned by both UN and EU.

Democracy is nothing but a hollow word when the democratically elected have no power to bring out the people's will as America is pointing where the political leader(s) are going to go.

[Dogmeat1950]

the U.N is a fucking Joke. they can't even do shit look at hte ppl in the Suddan, there starving to death it has been showed before the U.N 8 times in the last 7 years. all they do is sit on there ass.

Sources!? I have many friends that that where in Iraq and most of the time they said the media there was complete BS. I my self is planning to Join the Marines after College. so how about you sit back in Sweden and keep playing games and doing jack shit and trust in a failed thing called the U.N

[BorkaBonum]

@Dogmeat1950

Well, to a degree I do agree upon UN being nothing but a lazy bunch, same goes with the head of European Union - but the point here is that both condemned the US from engaging in Iraq.

Your friends aren't any source to take note from as they're not journalists and they're probably having too much feelings into taking the military side on every accord. And yeah - you do that, you go and die in a stupid war while I might have a chance to carry out my biological purpose.

[Dogmeat1950]

also, yes mistakes where made about invading Iraq. but we blew the fuck out of there military we are Americans we don't blow shit up and leave the country. we have paid tons of money on rebuilding Iraq. retrained there military and police force to be better then what they where,

[BorkaBonum]

@Dogmeat1950

If you're going to flag with the Iraq war being so necessary and almost glorious you shouldn't portrait the American performance to "blew the fuck" out of anything. Blunt force is the American motto, not precision, alas it leaves alot of civilian casulties.

And yeah, you're Americans - you ruin a country, patch up a few unimportant buildings while stealing their oil resources, pointing where the politicians should do and basicly just increase tension.

[BorkaBonum]

@Dogmeat1950

Dogmeat, you're the one being a brainwashed, or plain stupid, individual who claims stuff you don't have a clue about. America is trying to hide their interests in Iraq in plain sight - and it takes a fool like you to miss it.

The Iraqi War was over before it even started. America did another historical fiasco, civilian lives were spilled and there was nothing good to come out of it - except for American weapon manufacturer's pockets.

[Dogmeat1950]

Brian washed!? IRAQ WAR IS DAMN NEAR OVER DUMB SHIT. we don't have that many troops there. after the Surge in 2007 fighting has dropped 70%.

American Weapon Manufacturers? wow you are dumb. AT-4 Heat Swedish MADE the USA uses a good deal of Swedish made weapons dumb shit.

let me guess u get your info from TV and news sights that u like lol.

[BorkaBonum]

@Dogmeat1950

The war on Iraq was over years ago.

Fighting has dropped 70% according to American military statistics or actual, objective sources magically monitoring the sector?

Duh. Swedish manufacturers is selling special purpose weapons such as the AT4 while the entire American army is equipped with American weapons produced by Colt and others.

And no, I don't watch TV. I don't watch/read any god damn source like a book as that spawns idiocy.

[clustro]

we didnt lose to germany though

that's where you're from.

fucking faggot. learn how to speak to your betters.

[michal3550]

Hey man look at my version of this mission, I hope you enjoy:)

[vikingskald]

Er, um. The USA has pretty much the dominant military. We got 200 strategic bombers, several hundred F-16s, a few hundred F-15s. We will have a couple of hundred F-22s and F-35s.

Ground wise, we got the dominant MBT, more sensor platforms.

Navy wise, well we got over 10 Nimitz class nuclear carriers flying about 54 4th Generation fighters. Not to mention AEGIS cruisers and destroyers as well as the top nuclear attack submarine out there.

[BorkaBonum]

Military hardware means nothing. The Soviets pushed the Germans out of Russia in the second world war by a struck of luck and using sheer manpower. Plus, whatever American officials insist upon in military numbers there's no way anybody knows what Russia and China is sitting with, so it's actually just numbers.

And hell, Russia just happends to sit with the world's most devestating nuclear warheads. And Swedish manufactors were first ones to produce a Stealth Corvette-class.

[DeeZireRa2]

I rarely used the Gatling gun because it's quite hard to use and it only covers a small AoE. The 40 mm is my preferred weapon. Covers a large AoE but still small enough to make sure no friendlies are going to be hit.

This mission does not have much threats to you. It's more like of a "enjoy the view" mission.

[diehardsmokerbuddy]

n00b

[SaturnVII]

Actually you're flying a AC-130U Spooky Gunship. The Spectre doesn't have 25mm guns.

[Labyrinth11]

That is so realistic - almost exactly like real AC-130 gun camera footage!

[bigmaxy07]

Now that is superb.

[mhamad84]

Perfect graphics and sound quality

[gutayui]

これ作り物だね。人間の吹っ飛び方が全部同じ。

[awsomehaz310]

hay ericsherman1 u may think that teh us army is soooooo great with having more troops n all n but right now we have better trained soldiers and better tanks not to mention airservice n navy oh ya n before u say usa is better we saved u in world war 2 well basically i got this to say that was years n years ago so really our army is better than ures so take ure bullshit n keep it to urself.

[ccisbeast]

Um...

Our troops are trained just as well as yours are. Our tanks are perfectly on par with yours. Our aircraft are superior to yours, and we have the pilots to back it up (in fact, look it up, we're replacing your Harrier that you made for us, and you're replacing your own harriers with our creation, the F-35) We are one of the leading nations in Naval technology and one of only three considered "Blue-Water Navies" along with you and France. You are nowhere near any better than us. Nice try.

[extazyrocks]

Oh..btw depleted uranium isnt very radioactive...plus if they ACTUALLY used that for armor they would think ofa way to protect the crew only if it was THAT effective.. but its only very heavy and they use it to penetrate vehicle armor .thats abou the part of the description about it

[BorkaBonum]

That's the official story, the shells using depleted uranium carries radioactive materials which have killed American troops, not to mention civilians. The reason why the depleted uranium is used in the armor is becuase it's cheap, if it was expensive it wouldn't be considered.

[extazyrocks]

sorry... my mistake i looked it up, it just didnt seem logic to use it in armor, i thought its used for armor piercing bullets because of how heavy it is but yep...i saw some of the effects...what can i say we live in a fucked up world ^^

[1903sergen1903]

i love this level best level

[eriksherman1]

you're a fag. the best soldier in the world. MARSOC U.S. Marine

nothing you could EVER SAY and thats all it is, talk you're spewing out, could change that.

[BorkaBonum]

Your nationalistic bullshit won't convince anyone. Grow some balls and get a grip.

[Ballerfella2007]

LOL... What is the name of this game....Is the whole game played this way...It seems very cool...What system is it on as well....PS3,X360, or what??

[kornythegreat]

its call of duty 4 for ps3 xbox 360 and pc, but i would get call of duty modern warfare 2

[10Xcrazy]

OORAH!!!GET SOME

[Manowar812]

Strong work there Cptdeath. Just like the real one. Hail Mafia!

[dazey606]

One of my fav. missions!

[tigerbait134]

go stick osamas dick up your ass

[Ridley200]

yup, that's why it's been "Liberated" so many times. coz they're clearly better then the winning armies....

[Aptutte]

Hahah i just love when he says "Ka-Boom" !! so great

[zeathan]

dmn... i love this game!

[jxbud]

Oopsie Daisie

[Real720]

that was the funniest shit!

[AshHousewares445]

Fun game. It's kinda easy to get Ranks on multiplayer

[pigusdj]

In IRAQ American soldiers have killed 600.000 whit same weapons Civilians! Children and woman! In hiroshima and nagasaky (200.000) ASSASSINS!! FUCK ALL!!

[fallofman317]

No, fuck you.

[BorkaBonum]

What's you point? This is nothing new.

[juan5021]

your stupid muther fucker you fuck your mom

[kikiko47]

thats the world man, after all humans are just advanced animals. and what do animals do best?

[Doooolan]

fuck

[netzero26]

then kill

[StoffeBuZ]

U should shoot more, dude...

More realistic and u never lose ammo :P

[puddingsplat2341]

ya im just lighten people up wit the small gun

[bentcard]

This level looks kick ass. I would like to say something for the About the video section. DEPLETED Uranium is hardly dangerous because... its depleted. And Im sure that its not easy/cheap to acquire. DU is only dangerous if you breathe it in or a piece of it (shrapnel) gets into your skin (ie: if the tank is blown to bits in which case you would probably be dead anyways) but otherwise if my chem teacher is correct the radiation particles are so weak that they cant even go through your skin

[BorkaBonum]

Mjaaa... there's numerous reports of sickness, some lighter than others, and cancer has been the followup for those in the direct surrounding of both banged up armor and shells. So I'm not just assuming its dangerous becuase it is Uranium in the core. Depleted Uranium is easy to accuire, otherwise it wouldn't have been used - the tanks wouldn't be very interesting to fight with if they were filled with rare materials.

[Blober112]

i love it how you blow up the tanks,nice work 5/5 as always

[golfer1373]

no ireally hate this part i like the nuke and the end the part where he throws the gun to you to kill the boss guy i like that mission...

[gunzkevin]

nice what settings are u running at and are u playing at 1680x1050 now?

[BorkaBonum]

Ah, yeah, I'm on 1680x1050 now, so things are a bit out of proportion when recording at full resolution (for the screen, still 50% screen capture). I'm running highest settings but without any AntiAliasing filtering and Medium/High textures on Multiplayer.

[gunzkevin]

What frames are u producing in mp and in sp?

[gunzkevin]

What frames is it producing at those settings in mp and sp?

[BorkaBonum]

around 45-55FPS during Campaign and around 30-35FPS average during 28-player Multiplayer games. I havent done any real benchmarks or anything, this is my best guess after opening the game and seeing the in-game FPS during capture and not today.