OH JESUS THE THOUGHT POLICE ARE HERE NO NEED TO FEAR!! But seriously that last quote could have been a joke...not to mention you should encourage your viewers to go and read the whole thing or aren't you and intelecual show?
One thing i find should be taken into consideration is, some of those letters is 24 years old.. you never changed your opinion in 24 years? 24 years ago racism in the US was wide spread, alot of people didnt know better and after 24 years he want that forgotten because the world is different and he might know better? i dont know, i cant vote in this election but make sure to take this into consideration before condemning a person for something he did 24 years ago
Ron Paul signed of on a letter talking about race war and black kids should be charged as an adult. That kind of talk is the norm amoungst the right wing.
He has been promoting liberty for ALL people for over 30 years, Take a look at his message and actions over that time and they do not in any way support racist views. Give me a break Cenk, this is about as absurd as calling MLK a racist.
I find it ironic that the young turks have the nerve to question Ron Paul on something as silly as this when their host (Cenk Uygur) wrote several letters in the 1990's denying the Armenian genocide, which killed around 1.5 million Armenians. Not only that, but he also named his show off the "Young Turk Movement" that perpetrated the genocide during WW1. You think I'm lying? Go research it yourself. This guy is nothing but a hypocritical progressive piece of shit. Ron Paul 2012
@fortisKID I find it ironic that Ron Paul never picked up a newsletter in the 2 decades that it was printed and actually read it, considering it was printed in his name. I find it ironic that for someone who claims that he is for accountability, he is putting all the blame on the editor. I find it ironic that no one ever sent him a message either for or against the racist shit in his newsletters, in 2 decades. Ron Paul sucks and I can't wait until the day that he drops out.
@fortisKID Everybody have right to be wrong in their opinion.
He didn't blateny deny the genocide, he questioned the evidence.
It is not ethic to hate one because he has his own interpretation of history.
The show's name is a reference secularist movement of the same name, in the beginning it was was against the absolute monarchy. The reference is intended to be humorous.
He never supported the genocide or the racism behind it. Unlike Paul's newletter which is just blatent hatred.
@fortisKID Your statement proves that you do not watch the show. Cenk has never denied the Armenian genecide (and if he had, I think his Armenian co-host might have something to say about it). And he's explained a couple of times on the show that he didn't name the show after the movement.
If not him, someone he knew did. How could racist letters be published over several years and never be brought to Paul's attention by staff members or readers?
I see this video is a repeat of your 2008 video covering the same topic. No regard for the fact that he was too busy during those year being a newly elected congressman to write newsletters. Certainly his staff did write them. But I doubt even they believed what they were writing. It was probably done in an effort to gain support, as during those years it wouldn't have been an extreme position to have held.
@tartredarrow And he couldn't pick up a single newsletter and read what was written in his name? I know that if something was printed in my name I would read it and if there was something I disagreed with, I would address it immediately. I find it hard to believe that he never read one newsletter nor received any feedback from readers about what was in the newsletter. So much for Ron Paul touting accountability when he can't even accept responsibility himself. It's the editors fault, not his.
@Jeanluck1 Because he gave free medical service to 1 black woman, he's not a racist? I briefly dated a racist (before I knew he was) who had black friends. What's your point?
@samhain173 Said [Because he gave free medical service to 1 black woman, he's not a racist?]
1. If you would have wached the video, you would know that no one wanted to help that guy “because he was black” but RP he didn’t care a shit about that and he ended helping him. He not just help 1 black person, he helped alot more.
htt p://oi46.tinypic.com/2ai4jzr.jpg
2. If you had watch the last video, you would have seen alot more things that indicates that RP isn't racist.
“If you try to catch someone that has stolen a purse from you, there is no chance to catch them,” you're racist if you read this and think it must be a black man stealing that purse
this Ron Paul is racist stuff is bullshit. If you have a mind you can see in this presidential race it's Ron Paul or more Corruption. You guys share this saying HE wrote it as if you know. whoa what's this "grab your guns the animals are coming" - Cenk Uygur Newsletter
shit Cenk is a racist 'cause that their quote was definitely said by Cenk I know it I have no proof but I know it.
@GREASY357 Ron Paul wants to force his personal beliefs on the American people. He is against gay marriage because of his religious beliefs (signed the Defense of Marriage Act), and wants to federally define life as beginning at conception, which would outlaw abortion, removing a woman's right to choose. The only thing I fear more than a man who can be bought is a man who claims that he can't because the latter will force his personal beliefs on others.
They then had a follow up story reading out all the angry Australian letters from their video. However what they didn't show was the reasonable messages, instead they just showed the redneck ones of people swearing at them.. seriously.
Why do the Young Turks always have to act like they are all so high and mighty? Why are they ridiculously bias and politically correct? I go back to the whole Australian KFC add controversy which they completely took out of context. It was just a simple sports game where there was a white guy who was with the opposite teams supporters during the game, the West Indies. I don't see what's racist about that.. Is it because the West Indies supporters were black? Because.. factually they are.
Yes.. the man that stands for equal rights for ALL, treating everyone EQUALLY. Yes this man is obviously a racist and wants whites to dominate America.. oh wait he isn't gonna have any part in it because he wants everyone to be treated equally.
I'd be genuinely mad if Ron Paul made fun of that deformity on your forehead or your parents for naming you Cenk. Other than that, how do you know he wasn't being funny? You're just trying to gain Rons supporters which saturate the web.
CENK THEN SUPPORTS THE CONTINUED MASSACRE OF IRAQIS, AFGHANS, LIBYANS, SOON-TO-BE IRANIANS, AND THE LOSS OF AMERICAN LIVES OVERSEAS AND VIA SUICIDE. OBAMA DISAVOWED THINGS SAID BY HIS PASTOR AFTER SUPPORTING AND INDEED FINDING SPIRITUAL GUIDANCE IN AN ENVIRONMENT AND THROUGH A MAN WHO EXCLAIMED THINGS LIKE "GOD DAMN AMERICA" PASSIONATELY. ID SAY RON PAUL IS DOING A SIMILAR THING HERE. BUT CENK IS MORE CONCERNED ABOUT THIS THAN SENDING HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE OF ALL RACES TO THEIR DEATHS
Jeez - this has been debunked! Check Ben Swans "Reality Check" part 1 & 2. Even the name of the author has been exposed.
I can't believe that system critic progressives fell for this dirty old trick. Don't you get it? The establishment NEED something on Paul - especally if he is to run against dictator Obama.
@VilanAlarga he was awfully quiet when during Newt food stamp president and black should stop asking food stamp nonsense. If he Leader people think he is he maybe should have said something. Ron Paul just another politicians like the rest of them
Jee, are we down to "he was quiet when..." - I guess there is nothing solid to pin on Paul anyways, and it's actually a better argument than the lies, distortions and assumptions that most anti-liberty fascists (be they "progressive" or neocons) use.
Well, he was awfully quiet when a lot of other rubbish was said too. Perhaps he would be more of a leader if he screamed into the mic while the others where ranting their bullshit?
"Austin NAACP President Nelson Linder, who has known Ron Paul for 20 years, unequivocally dismissed charges that the Congressman was a racist in light of recent smear attempts, and said the reason for him being attacked was that he was a threat to the establishment."
If anybody takes this video as evidence that Ron Paul is racist, they need to give themselves a good thump on the head to get their brains working again. Wake up, people! Don't fall for the propaganda.
@niriop lol i get throu 1/3 of page u sent. old, disoveled or gotten out of context. name of page speaks of itself
Et tu, Mr. Destructo? The official blog of notorious former African dictator Mobutu Sese Seko
i understand why he s pissed off about that. as some1 earlier has noticed. they are not bringing up hes managing skill as a publisher 20+ years ago, but r trying to frame him as a racist. and then next they cut him form 2nd place from polls - thats manipulation.
@tenebriasz What fucking context? All the inflammatory stuff is self-contained on the pages scanned. Do you even know what you're talking about?
Erm, English please?
"thats manipulation" Nope, that's sweet sweet failure; Paultards are loud but their numbers narrow. Really, the racist newsletters should help him (these are the Republican primaries after all), but Paul will not win any states because he detracts so much from the Republican ideal. He will not win a single state.
@bluesrockfan36 "The one that had the name of the author, the only newspaper that had a byline, it was a special edition." Okay, so what do we have hear: we have your word of mouth. Should that word of mouth be true, that means we have only proof that one part of the newsletter was not written by Paul. The conclusion we can also draw from that is that Paul allowed racist material published under his name.
This goes without mentioning that it was supposedly Lew Rockwell [con]
[con] who had written them all these years, now suddenly he isn't.
Ah right: the mainstream media is right only when it says good things about ruler, got ya.
And you should read James Kirchick's "Angry White Man" article in New Republic, who actually spent several months tracking down all the newsletters, and coming to the conclusion that Paul at least intended to have the impression that he wrote the whole thing.
You see why we need a liberty revolution now, folks? These are the kind of neocons we are faced with - don't let their masks and badges fool you - it is either fascism or Ron Paul.
@VilanAlarga I'm an anti-war socialist you idiot; and don't pollute my mind with your brainless rhetoric; it doesn't work on a reality-centric cynic like me; I don't give a fuck about pretty words, just hard facts, hard facts I fuck bitches like you in the arse with over and over and over...
LOL! Youre ridiculing urself with a dirty mouth and complete lack of arguments & facts. Youre as much anti-war as the band of hooligans collected by Anton Drexel in Germany after WW1. They also enjoyed shooting helpless retards & innocent children. Your socalled socialism is probably similar to theirs. Albeit I support Pauls anarcholiberalism, I sympathise with anarchosyndicalism (the only working socialism, though not as effective as Austrian economics).
I am a fucking syndicalist you semi-illiterate twat. Lack of arguments? Yeah, saying I'm a Nazi and neo-con who wants to shoot children, what a fucking troll.
"You Paultards are easy; its like shooting retarded children in a pen, and nearly as pleasurable."
My oh my you have a big mouth. Seems it doesn't agree with yourself even. Quite a problem. Don't worry, when the freedom revolution is done, u will be able to fill it with as much fillth as u will.
@VilanAlarga You're confusing my irony and someone else's retarded claim.
"filth" Why is every Paultard obssessed with my fucking cunting bastard language? I mean, what does it cunting twating fucking matter in the end? I mean are you all soft in the cunting head? Fucking jittery cunts...
"freedom revolution" When? Ron Paul hasn't won a single state and capitalism is in its end times. Why are you bastards so fucking deluded?
We are not. We are fighting for your right to vomit as much oral crap as you like, unlike your sugar daddy Obama who is squeezing the last fragments of civil liberties as we speak.
As for the revolution - educate your self. It's not my job to mine through your mountain of bias and ignorance about what's going on. Good luck buddy.
@VilanAlarga What lie? Look at the archives in the link on the video; over 50 racist, homophobic, conspiratorial rants on display with his name plastered all over them.
@Jurassicparkrules96 His name is only on one newsletter to my knowledge. Also, more questions are garnered from this: why did Paul let such a racist moron write for him?
That also doesn't explain all the racist, homophobic, conspiratorial content from newsletters from years on end, and he NEVER noticed it in the slightest (even though by all accounts he was heavily involved in the editing process) nor did his family who ran itwhile he made millions from it? That's bullshit.
So u cannot even provide a link but want me to scan an entire debate elsewhere? At least give some quotes, references or memorized arguments. Otherwise, climb to a mountain top in Tibet, there's an old monestary there with a huge library at the basement. In the darkest corner u will find a huge book with all my counterarguments. Read them & we can continue.
I sympathize with ur position tho, not easy tryin to pin stuff on the good doc when reality doesnt back up ur desires.
@VilanAlarga You lazy fucking disengenuous piece of shit, check the links provided in the fucking description. "I win by being lazy and awkward", how fucking pathetic. What arguments are needed? Ron Paul knowingly published racist material for decades on end! What's there to add!?
"I sympathize with ur position tho, not easy tryin to pin stuff on the good doc when reality doesnt back up ur desires" Fuck you, the evidence is plain to see you deluded fucking moron.
Yes, the evidence is plain to see. We have the facts on our side - you have the establishments mainstream media corporation spin on yours. What a tool!
You are the only angry ranter and are probably projecting your own moon onto Paul. He is nothing but a calm and old-fashioned genetleman.
And no, what you are claiming is factually wrong - as any one who bother to check the facts out will discover. I guess you are not accustomed to facts and research, but prefer religiously biased bubbles.
Nope, I just havn't bothered to make a profile yet.
as for you being an atheist, thats hillarious - given that you are behaving like a religious nut - closing yourself into a bubble of denial and refusing to look at evidence.
As for your slandering of Paul elsewhere - I shall in fact check it out. Something tells me we need to clean up your dirt there too.
@viper10011 Operating a racist newsletter for ten years? Well me and the black community won't get over it. I'm not mad at Ron Paul but hes never going to be president for what he's done
@niriop He admitted to publishing his writings in certain articles about economics and monetary policy. No one is saying he never wrote in them but the reality is a lot less exciting then you're indicating.
@opszanski Texas Daily Star, 1996: "Dr. Paul denied suggestions that he was a racist and said he was not evoking stereotypes when he wrote the columns."
@niriop Texas Monthly, 2001: “I could never say this in the campaign, but those words weren’t really written by me. It wasn’t my language at all. Other people help me with my newsletter as I travel around . . . I actually really wanted to try to explain that it doesn’t come from me directly, but they [campaign aides] said that’s too confusing."
@opszanski Bullshit; why did he admit to writing them in the first place? And how can you blame aides for you admitting to writing racially inflamatory stuff?
That makes no sense, and even if it works out that way, that still means he's lied repeatedly.
@niriop He didn't "blame" them, he was giving an explanation. Don't be so hypersensitive.
If you look at the two sources I gave above, his explanation in 2001, and a mixture of many other suggestive elements, it becomes obvious to even the most simple minded person what happened.
@opszanski Nope, sounds like he's putting the blame on them tacitly, as with that Jon Huntsman tweet earlier and anything else that ever goes wrong.
So he admitted to writing racially inflamatory articles in order to...what? Why did he do such a stupid thing? He deserves credit alone for that, and knowingly letting racists print under his name. Fucking dumbass.
And I've remembered you: the Paultard who claims not to be a Ron Paul supporter who goes around defending Paul all day.
@niriop Thank you for demonstrating your unbias and objective judgement.
Don't you have a good memory (you know there two 2 people arguing to each other all day)?
If your going to be a idiot again and call "bullshit" on everything before giving information its proper consideration then there's no point in me arguing with you. If, however, you're open to the possibility that you might be wrong (I know, it's unthinkable) then I'll give you the other side of the argument for your consideration.
@opszanski No contradiction: I considered your claims, dismissed them, and merely returned to my original position. I'm still open to new evidence, which may or may not negate or lessen that position, but you have failed to provide me with such information. Hence: Paul is a racist scumbag, you are a moron. The former I feel has an ice cube in the planetary's core's chance of being disproven from the evidence as yet presented, the latter, erm, not so much. So, please, engage...
@niriop You said "its impossible", that's not considering anything.
"but you have failed to provide me with such information. Hence: Paul is a racist scumbag"
??? Since when is the onus on the defendant to disprove an unproven accusation? I've given you 2 good links that should show it's unproven at the very least. If you want to know the logic I used then say so but it will take a lot of these comment boxes.
And I reject those links as inconsequential. "If you want to know the logic I used then say so but it will take a lot of these comment boxes" What the fuck are you talking about Paultard? You've failed to give me anything that says otherwise, so give me the evidence. I severely doubt it will disprove them.
Here's my own footage of him taking full credit: watch?v=_m-RhKBfb2g, watch?v=eW755u5460A and watch?v=HL4H7JlMCfE
@niriop I've given you TWO links that should call into question what your saying. I've already seen those videos and they don't prove anything. On the contrary, they actually raise objections. Nobody said he never wrote in them, the question is if he wrote the racist parts. Why would he openly promote a racist newsletter? Why did he never mention the racism angle in any of his responses. The 3rd link happened before the racist parts came out in 1988.
@opszanski "Why would he openly promote a racist newsletter?" Because it didn't occur to him that it'd bite it in the arse until later, then he lied about it. Look: either he wrote them (which to me is obvious), or he knowingly allowed racist material publish under his name (and he lied about), for which he also employs responsibility.
"The 3rd link happened before the racist parts came out in 1988" The newsletters have a lot more stuff than just racism: homophobia, AIDS denialism...
@niriop I'm sorry, I didn't word it properly. But everyone agrees that the racism, homophobia, anti-semitism, etc. all started in 1988. The newsletter had been publishing since the 70s and it wasn't until '88 that these things started to appear. You say that it's obvious he wrote them. No it isn't because it has been confirmed James Powell wrote during that time and had much of the same racist tone found elsewhere.
@opszanski Actually, the nuttiness stretches back to 1978. I discovered an archive with all sort of inflamatory bullshit. To say Ron Paul didn't write even a bit of this, or even know about it is bullshit.
And that's yet another story change: Lew Rockwell was originally named and blamed. So at this point, all I see is a cross-section of lies, blame games and fuck ups, and even if he didn't write a single fucking word (which is *complete* bullshit), he is still responsible for it all.
@niriop Bullshit. Give me the website that showed there was racism and bigotry before 1988. There are strong reasons to suggest Lew Rockwell wrote racist newsletters, and now we see that another person was behind suspicious newsletter at that time. Your reasoning is that this is a blame game? Yeah, Reason Magazine is behind making these excuses and some other RP fan is behind manufacturing the newsletter with James Powell name. A case can be made he holds responsibility, but this is a witch
"Your reasoning is that this is a blame game?" The fact is that he owned up, then denied it, blamed someone else, now there's someone else being blamed, even though various inflammatory stuff was spread throughout all the newsletters. So what if the "worst" stuff is between 1988-92? That doesn't say anything at all. It still had HIS signature in HIS NL
"but this is a witch hunt" Wow, making someone bear responsibility is a witch hunt
@Malcom123X well another you tube comment told me so. besides he apologized said those where not his positions and moved on maby you guys should to instead of still talking about things that happened 20 years ago.
People WAKE UP, Cenk may or may not be"MSM aligned", but that DOES NOT mean that he's exempt from stupid non-citating reporting. Go back to the 1997 beginnings of ALL the newsletters. It quotes 'mystery, anonymous sources', and knew who the author was, BUT wouldn't say who.
Oh, btw, people keep an eye out for Ben Swann's report tonight on the newsletters. He's saying what WAS OFFICIAL before 3 weeks ago, and is now considered 'propaganda from Paul users'. There was only one newsletter, it went out in a special edition considered 'separate' from Ron Paul, it had 8-10 sentences of racist remarks(out of a couple thousand pages, no wonder it didn't get noticed by Paul), In the OFFICIAL PDFs of them that people use so much, the author's byline is cut off...
Wow Cenk, I expected more of you. Your analysis makes no sense at all. Those are ALL one line quotes. You cannot judge anyone or anything based on a bunch of one line quotes put together. Dont you know that? I thought you understood the power of EDITING. Aren't you a reporter? OF COURSE you can't read quotes out of context. OF COURSE you have to read the whole article. This could be just like the SHIRLEY SHERROD case!! Didn't TYT cover the SHIRLEY SHERROD story? Didnt you learn anything from it?
I don't believe he is racist at all, but say Ron Paul is. that would be terrible and it does not sound like him at all. however even if he was why don't you all look at his positions on issues and see that the Racist Ron Paul does a pretty poor job of acting like a racist as his positions are the most friendly to minorities in the US. so Even if you believe he is a racist you should still vote for him because his policies would be the most beneficial to all races.
all the quotes you gave from ron paul himself you did not give the source so we can check it out ourselves... your just like the rest of the main stream media Cenk twisting stuff to suit your ideology. i would like to see the stuff your talking about how about you show where you got that stuff from? non of the things ron paul said according to you was racist non of it said anything about race... your only able to associate it with race due to the racist comments in the disavowed news letters
@TheYoungTurks I saw this interesting report on the Ron Paul newsletters and I thought I would share it with you guys and your viewers/bloggers. It was by Ben Swann of WXIX. His show is called reality check. I hope everyone checks it out.
@crashmidget15 I really hope there is a complete economic collapse so that we can finally get rid of this unfair, money based, racist political system.
*sigh* I was kind of hoping a while back he wouldn't be quite as bad as the people he's running against. Turns out he's just as bad, but in different ways.
@D10SdelFutbol The Ron Paul cult swallows everything that their Messiah Spews! If wRong Paul says that the sky is red, the wRongBots will defiantly defend him on that as well!
@D10SdelFutbol Yes protecting the same constitution that he ignores when it comes to a woman's uterus! wRong Paul the retard wants to abolish Roe V Wade and allow states to dictate what a Woman should do with here uterus! YOU TRULY ARE A MORON!!
@deeppurple28 I can't even begin to express how WRONG you are. LIFE BEGINS AT CONCEPTION IS A SCIENTIFIC FACT.
We need to protect LIFE if we ever want to protect Liberty (two concepts you clearly do not understand). Rode vs Wade allows you to kill a baby in the third trimester, it's murder of a human being. But Dr. Paul just wants the Federal Government out of the issue and leave it to the states, always taking into consideration situations like rape, incest, etc.
@hey53t0 So now you know more than our troops about foreign policy? BECAUSE DR. PAUL GETS MORE DONATIONS FROM THE MILITARY THAN ALL THE GOP CANDIDATES PUT TOGETHER ... EVEN MORE THAN OBAMA.
Now Im not voting for Ron Paul because he's a........ wait hold up a second....... this is the media and the media ALWAYS LIE AND PUT SLANDER ON PPL THEY DONT LIKE. Or they could have brought something from the past that is meaningless now.
as a white person, black people scare me
pimpinspartan 2 weeks ago
@pimpinspartan why
youngatnaruto 1 week ago
@youngatnaruto gangster rap
pimpinspartan 1 week ago
@pimpinspartan what about gangsta rap..not everybody black person listens
to gansta rap.. i listen to all types...and there are many subgenres of rap
just like rock
youngatnaruto 1 week ago
OH JESUS THE THOUGHT POLICE ARE HERE NO NEED TO FEAR!! But seriously that last quote could have been a joke...not to mention you should encourage your viewers to go and read the whole thing or aren't you and intelecual show?
12myersjonathan 2 weeks ago
One thing i find should be taken into consideration is, some of those letters is 24 years old.. you never changed your opinion in 24 years? 24 years ago racism in the US was wide spread, alot of people didnt know better and after 24 years he want that forgotten because the world is different and he might know better? i dont know, i cant vote in this election but make sure to take this into consideration before condemning a person for something he did 24 years ago
jiiub 3 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@jiiub
Some of those newsletters were from the 90s.
help4343 2 days ago
............. (tear come out of eye*)
mattgarcia1 3 weeks ago
Ron Paul signed of on a letter talking about race war and black kids should be charged as an adult. That kind of talk is the norm amoungst the right wing.
TheCaliCapitalist 4 weeks ago 2
He has been promoting liberty for ALL people for over 30 years, Take a look at his message and actions over that time and they do not in any way support racist views. Give me a break Cenk, this is about as absurd as calling MLK a racist.
TheOrdinaryEconomist 4 weeks ago
Ron Paul doesn't beleive in evolution, appeased racism through non action and has no understanding of economics. yeah great guy for president.
XepicmeauX 1 month ago
Paultards, get the fuck over yourselves. "Dr" Paul is a racist bigot - end of. Deal with your cultleader being put on the spot.
Wishchrono 1 month ago 3
I find it ironic that the young turks have the nerve to question Ron Paul on something as silly as this when their host (Cenk Uygur) wrote several letters in the 1990's denying the Armenian genocide, which killed around 1.5 million Armenians. Not only that, but he also named his show off the "Young Turk Movement" that perpetrated the genocide during WW1. You think I'm lying? Go research it yourself. This guy is nothing but a hypocritical progressive piece of shit. Ron Paul 2012
fortisKID 1 month ago 23
@fortisKID I find it ironic that Ron Paul never picked up a newsletter in the 2 decades that it was printed and actually read it, considering it was printed in his name. I find it ironic that for someone who claims that he is for accountability, he is putting all the blame on the editor. I find it ironic that no one ever sent him a message either for or against the racist shit in his newsletters, in 2 decades. Ron Paul sucks and I can't wait until the day that he drops out.
samhain173 1 month ago
@samhain173
That's the wrong use of the word ironic.
tartredarrow 4 weeks ago
@fortisKID Everybody have right to be wrong in their opinion.
He didn't blateny deny the genocide, he questioned the evidence.
It is not ethic to hate one because he has his own interpretation of history.
The show's name is a reference secularist movement of the same name, in the beginning it was was against the absolute monarchy. The reference is intended to be humorous.
He never supported the genocide or the racism behind it. Unlike Paul's newletter which is just blatent hatred.
XepicmeauX 4 weeks ago
@fortisKID Your statement proves that you do not watch the show. Cenk has never denied the Armenian genecide (and if he had, I think his Armenian co-host might have something to say about it). And he's explained a couple of times on the show that he didn't name the show after the movement.
DarthMerlin 3 weeks ago
@fortisKID Questioning his credibility doesn't restore Ron Paul's, btw :d
LichQueenKathie 2 weeks ago
@fortisKID
Yeah, how dare someone have the nerve to hold someone accountable for their words.
help4343 4 days ago
@help4343 Ron Paul didn't write those. This has been proven countless times.
fortisKID 2 days ago
@fortisKID
If not him, someone he knew did. How could racist letters be published over several years and never be brought to Paul's attention by staff members or readers?
help4343 2 days ago
Lew Rockwell? Give me a break he's not a racist.
GompCelticPL 1 month ago
@GompCelticPL He sure writes like a racist.
chewbaccajoe 1 month ago
I see this video is a repeat of your 2008 video covering the same topic. No regard for the fact that he was too busy during those year being a newly elected congressman to write newsletters. Certainly his staff did write them. But I doubt even they believed what they were writing. It was probably done in an effort to gain support, as during those years it wouldn't have been an extreme position to have held.
tartredarrow 1 month ago
@tartredarrow And he couldn't pick up a single newsletter and read what was written in his name? I know that if something was printed in my name I would read it and if there was something I disagreed with, I would address it immediately. I find it hard to believe that he never read one newsletter nor received any feedback from readers about what was in the newsletter. So much for Ron Paul touting accountability when he can't even accept responsibility himself. It's the editors fault, not his.
samhain173 1 month ago
@samhain173
1) I doubt racist stuff was posted in ALL of his newsletters. It was probably just a few.
2)You missed my point.
tartredarrow 4 weeks ago
Dr Ron Paul newsletters, racist accusation and the 1996 article (among other things) is explain in this faq:
scribd.com/doc/76280303/PaulNewslettersFaq-Tunk
People should stop being lazy and research by themself instead of buying into the MSM BS immediately.
watch?v=h0hpiwfM2qo
watch?v=HP-mYq4DaJI
And Ron Paul is not racist:
(RP gave Free medical service to the wife of a black man where none else would in
Texas in the 70s) ==> watch?v=8Rv0Z5SNrF4
watch?v=i3EADdr-5AY
Jeanluck1 1 month ago
@Jeanluck1 Because he gave free medical service to 1 black woman, he's not a racist? I briefly dated a racist (before I knew he was) who had black friends. What's your point?
samhain173 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@samhain173 Said [Because he gave free medical service to 1 black woman, he's not a racist?]
1. If you would have wached the video, you would know that no one wanted to help that guy “because he was black” but RP he didn’t care a shit about that and he ended helping him. He not just help 1 black person, he helped alot more.
htt p://oi46.tinypic.com/2ai4jzr.jpg
2. If you had watch the last video, you would have seen alot more things that indicates that RP isn't racist.
Jeanluck1 1 month ago
“If you try to catch someone that has stolen a purse from you, there is no chance to catch them,” you're racist if you read this and think it must be a black man stealing that purse
GREASY357 1 month ago
this Ron Paul is racist stuff is bullshit. If you have a mind you can see in this presidential race it's Ron Paul or more Corruption. You guys share this saying HE wrote it as if you know. whoa what's this "grab your guns the animals are coming" - Cenk Uygur Newsletter
shit Cenk is a racist 'cause that their quote was definitely said by Cenk I know it I have no proof but I know it.
GREASY357 1 month ago
@GREASY357 Ron Paul wants to force his personal beliefs on the American people. He is against gay marriage because of his religious beliefs (signed the Defense of Marriage Act), and wants to federally define life as beginning at conception, which would outlaw abortion, removing a woman's right to choose. The only thing I fear more than a man who can be bought is a man who claims that he can't because the latter will force his personal beliefs on others.
samhain173 1 month ago
They then had a follow up story reading out all the angry Australian letters from their video. However what they didn't show was the reasonable messages, instead they just showed the redneck ones of people swearing at them.. seriously.
Kirkzzy 1 month ago
Why do the Young Turks always have to act like they are all so high and mighty? Why are they ridiculously bias and politically correct? I go back to the whole Australian KFC add controversy which they completely took out of context. It was just a simple sports game where there was a white guy who was with the opposite teams supporters during the game, the West Indies. I don't see what's racist about that.. Is it because the West Indies supporters were black? Because.. factually they are.
Kirkzzy 1 month ago
Yes.. the man that stands for equal rights for ALL, treating everyone EQUALLY. Yes this man is obviously a racist and wants whites to dominate America.. oh wait he isn't gonna have any part in it because he wants everyone to be treated equally.
Kirkzzy 1 month ago
I'd be genuinely mad if Ron Paul made fun of that deformity on your forehead or your parents for naming you Cenk. Other than that, how do you know he wasn't being funny? You're just trying to gain Rons supporters which saturate the web.
Steven5082 1 month ago
I'm black and I think thats hilarious.
Steven5082 1 month ago 16
Guilty
TheCaliCapitalist 1 month ago
This is weak sauce!
GrandChessboard 1 month ago
this ron paul bubble is bursting faster than i thought.
MissNophi2U 1 month ago
Paultards have been duped as deeply as Obama yes we can tards.
GenghisCohen1 1 month ago
CENK THEN SUPPORTS THE CONTINUED MASSACRE OF IRAQIS, AFGHANS, LIBYANS, SOON-TO-BE IRANIANS, AND THE LOSS OF AMERICAN LIVES OVERSEAS AND VIA SUICIDE. OBAMA DISAVOWED THINGS SAID BY HIS PASTOR AFTER SUPPORTING AND INDEED FINDING SPIRITUAL GUIDANCE IN AN ENVIRONMENT AND THROUGH A MAN WHO EXCLAIMED THINGS LIKE "GOD DAMN AMERICA" PASSIONATELY. ID SAY RON PAUL IS DOING A SIMILAR THING HERE. BUT CENK IS MORE CONCERNED ABOUT THIS THAN SENDING HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE OF ALL RACES TO THEIR DEATHS
dustbowlsammie 1 month ago 3
@dustbowlsammie Shutup. Just, shutup.
1. All caps doesn't make your point any truer.
2. Get some facts, will you?
unifieddynasty 1 month ago
Jeez - this has been debunked! Check Ben Swans "Reality Check" part 1 & 2. Even the name of the author has been exposed.
I can't believe that system critic progressives fell for this dirty old trick. Don't you get it? The establishment NEED something on Paul - especally if he is to run against dictator Obama.
One word Cenk: OWN UP!
VilanAlarga 1 month ago
@VilanAlarga he was awfully quiet when during Newt food stamp president and black should stop asking food stamp nonsense. If he Leader people think he is he maybe should have said something. Ron Paul just another politicians like the rest of them
bumfire007 1 month ago
@bumfire007
Jee, are we down to "he was quiet when..." - I guess there is nothing solid to pin on Paul anyways, and it's actually a better argument than the lies, distortions and assumptions that most anti-liberty fascists (be they "progressive" or neocons) use.
Well, he was awfully quiet when a lot of other rubbish was said too. Perhaps he would be more of a leader if he screamed into the mic while the others where ranting their bullshit?
No, that's not Paul. He is a polite man.
VilanAlarga 1 month ago
@VilanAlarga That's two words Paultard.
LoonyRonPaul 1 month ago
@LoonyRonPaul
I know, I wanted a comment like this to bring more attention to my message, Obama turd ;)
VilanAlarga 1 month ago
There's no way you get a Republican without a serious amount of ugly. I'd still vote for him over Obama though, we needs civil liberties.
MyTemporaryAccount88 1 month ago 5
the deaf translation is incorrect
petechandanatural 1 month ago
@nkelly1432 Trolled.
XxLinkFookedZeldaxX 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Austin NAACP President Nelson Linder, who has known Ron Paul for 20 years, unequivocally dismissed charges that the Congressman was a racist in light of recent smear attempts, and said the reason for him being attacked was that he was a threat to the establishment."
LIBERTYALONE 1 month ago 2
Comment removed
tenebriasz 1 month ago
fuck u u asshole
iasfl 1 month ago
Cenk Uygur = propaganda pusher
If anybody takes this video as evidence that Ron Paul is racist, they need to give themselves a good thump on the head to get their brains working again. Wake up, people! Don't fall for the propaganda.
pookiecatblue 1 month ago
You Paultards are easy; its like shooting retarded children in a pen, and nearly as pleasurable.
niriop 1 month ago
@niriop lol i get throu 1/3 of page u sent. old, disoveled or gotten out of context. name of page speaks of itself
Et tu, Mr. Destructo? The official blog of notorious former African dictator Mobutu Sese Seko
i understand why he s pissed off about that. as some1 earlier has noticed. they are not bringing up hes managing skill as a publisher 20+ years ago, but r trying to frame him as a racist. and then next they cut him form 2nd place from polls - thats manipulation.
tenebriasz 1 month ago
@tenebriasz What fucking context? All the inflammatory stuff is self-contained on the pages scanned. Do you even know what you're talking about?
Erm, English please?
"thats manipulation" Nope, that's sweet sweet failure; Paultards are loud but their numbers narrow. Really, the racist newsletters should help him (these are the Republican primaries after all), but Paul will not win any states because he detracts so much from the Republican ideal. He will not win a single state.
niriop 1 month ago
@niriop
Uhm I know the report you're talking about.
But conveniently one last page was not scanned.
The one that had the name of the author, the only newspaper that had a byline, it was a special edition.
The author was James B. Powell.
If you're interested in an objective analysis of the newsletters by a professional *real* journalist:
/watch?v=rGH77lZsglU
/watch?v=2DOS9WwKAqA
The journalist has no affiliation to Ron Paul whatsoever, he just report objectively for a change.
bluesrockfan36 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bluesrockfan36 "The one that had the name of the author, the only newspaper that had a byline, it was a special edition." Okay, so what do we have hear: we have your word of mouth. Should that word of mouth be true, that means we have only proof that one part of the newsletter was not written by Paul. The conclusion we can also draw from that is that Paul allowed racist material published under his name.
This goes without mentioning that it was supposedly Lew Rockwell [con]
niriop 1 month ago
[con] who had written them all these years, now suddenly he isn't.
Ah right: the mainstream media is right only when it says good things about ruler, got ya.
And you should read James Kirchick's "Angry White Man" article in New Republic, who actually spent several months tracking down all the newsletters, and coming to the conclusion that Paul at least intended to have the impression that he wrote the whole thing.
niriop 1 month ago
@niriop
Thanks for exposing yourself, dimwit.
You see why we need a liberty revolution now, folks? These are the kind of neocons we are faced with - don't let their masks and badges fool you - it is either fascism or Ron Paul.
VilanAlarga 1 month ago
@VilanAlarga I'm an anti-war socialist you idiot; and don't pollute my mind with your brainless rhetoric; it doesn't work on a reality-centric cynic like me; I don't give a fuck about pretty words, just hard facts, hard facts I fuck bitches like you in the arse with over and over and over...
niriop 1 month ago 2
@niriop
LOL! Youre ridiculing urself with a dirty mouth and complete lack of arguments & facts. Youre as much anti-war as the band of hooligans collected by Anton Drexel in Germany after WW1. They also enjoyed shooting helpless retards & innocent children. Your socalled socialism is probably similar to theirs. Albeit I support Pauls anarcholiberalism, I sympathise with anarchosyndicalism (the only working socialism, though not as effective as Austrian economics).
You sir r a fascist.
VilanAlarga 1 month ago
@VilanAlarga What a fucking ramble of bullshit.
I am a fucking syndicalist you semi-illiterate twat. Lack of arguments? Yeah, saying I'm a Nazi and neo-con who wants to shoot children, what a fucking troll.
niriop 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@niriop
Fascist quote of the day:
"You Paultards are easy; its like shooting retarded children in a pen, and nearly as pleasurable."
My oh my you have a big mouth. Seems it doesn't agree with yourself even. Quite a problem. Don't worry, when the freedom revolution is done, u will be able to fill it with as much fillth as u will.
VilanAlarga 1 month ago
@VilanAlarga You're confusing my irony and someone else's retarded claim.
"filth" Why is every Paultard obssessed with my fucking cunting bastard language? I mean, what does it cunting twating fucking matter in the end? I mean are you all soft in the cunting head? Fucking jittery cunts...
"freedom revolution" When? Ron Paul hasn't won a single state and capitalism is in its end times. Why are you bastards so fucking deluded?
niriop 4 weeks ago
@niriop
We are not. We are fighting for your right to vomit as much oral crap as you like, unlike your sugar daddy Obama who is squeezing the last fragments of civil liberties as we speak.
As for the revolution - educate your self. It's not my job to mine through your mountain of bias and ignorance about what's going on. Good luck buddy.
VilanAlarga 3 weeks ago
@VilanAlarga I despise Obama, why won't you cunts understand that?
I am educated, highly, and what I see adds up to Paul being a racist and you a fucking deluded moronic cult member.
niriop 3 weeks ago
Haha! Keep telling your self that.
While you're at it, educate your self on the Newsletter lie.
VilanAlarga 3 weeks ago
@VilanAlarga What lie? Look at the archives in the link on the video; over 50 racist, homophobic, conspiratorial rants on display with his name plastered all over them.
niriop 3 weeks ago
@niriop under his name,but a guy named james powell wrote them
Jurassicparkrules96 3 weeks ago
@Jurassicparkrules96 His name is only on one newsletter to my knowledge. Also, more questions are garnered from this: why did Paul let such a racist moron write for him?
That also doesn't explain all the racist, homophobic, conspiratorial content from newsletters from years on end, and he NEVER noticed it in the slightest (even though by all accounts he was heavily involved in the editing process) nor did his family who ran itwhile he made millions from it? That's bullshit.
niriop 3 weeks ago
@niriop Also, how do we know that "James Powell" isn't just a Paul pseudonym? I can't find any evidence of his existence outside of the controversy.
There is a Cato Institute scholar with that name but I can't link him to Paul.
Also, why has Lew Rockwell stopped being blamed all of a sudden?
niriop 3 weeks ago
@niriop that would not make sense
Jurassicparkrules96 3 weeks ago
@niriop At that time he wasn't there he was practicing medicine.
Jurassicparkrules96 3 weeks ago
@Jurassicparkrules96 Lost cause...
niriop 3 weeks ago
@niriop ?
Jurassicparkrules96 3 weeks ago
@Jurassicparkrules96 You are...
niriop 3 weeks ago
Ron Paul admitted to writing the newsletters back in 1996, and every time he is countered with them he becomes angry and obscurantist.
niriop 1 month ago
@niriop
Evidence?
I didn't think so.
VilanAlarga 1 month ago
@VilanAlarga Go to my channel, see the Rachel Maddow mirror, check the links in the description. There's your fucking evidence dumbfuck
niriop 1 month ago
@niriop
So u cannot even provide a link but want me to scan an entire debate elsewhere? At least give some quotes, references or memorized arguments. Otherwise, climb to a mountain top in Tibet, there's an old monestary there with a huge library at the basement. In the darkest corner u will find a huge book with all my counterarguments. Read them & we can continue.
I sympathize with ur position tho, not easy tryin to pin stuff on the good doc when reality doesnt back up ur desires.
VilanAlarga 1 month ago
@VilanAlarga You lazy fucking disengenuous piece of shit, check the links provided in the fucking description. "I win by being lazy and awkward", how fucking pathetic. What arguments are needed? Ron Paul knowingly published racist material for decades on end! What's there to add!?
"I sympathize with ur position tho, not easy tryin to pin stuff on the good doc when reality doesnt back up ur desires" Fuck you, the evidence is plain to see you deluded fucking moron.
niriop 1 month ago
@niriop
Yes, the evidence is plain to see. We have the facts on our side - you have the establishments mainstream media corporation spin on yours. What a tool!
VilanAlarga 3 weeks ago
@VilanAlarga Delusion's a strong addictive drug...
niriop 3 weeks ago
@niriop
I know, and I can't help you with that.
VilanAlarga 3 weeks ago
@niriop
You are the only angry ranter and are probably projecting your own moon onto Paul. He is nothing but a calm and old-fashioned genetleman.
And no, what you are claiming is factually wrong - as any one who bother to check the facts out will discover. I guess you are not accustomed to facts and research, but prefer religiously biased bubbles.
VilanAlarga 3 weeks ago
moon = mood
VilanAlarga 3 weeks ago
@VilanAlarga A cranky racist old bastard is what he is.
Check the links in my video you lazy sanctimonious prick..
niriop 3 weeks ago
@VilanAlarga I'm an ATHEIST you dumbfuck! Why won't you look at my channel and see how I describe myself?
I can do the same with you because you're a pussy-assed tr0ll...
niriop 3 weeks ago
@niriop
Nope, I just havn't bothered to make a profile yet.
as for you being an atheist, thats hillarious - given that you are behaving like a religious nut - closing yourself into a bubble of denial and refusing to look at evidence.
As for your slandering of Paul elsewhere - I shall in fact check it out. Something tells me we need to clean up your dirt there too.
VilanAlarga 3 weeks ago
@VilanAlarga "closing yourself into a bubble of denial and refusing to look at evidence." Self-projection FTW!
Sounds like tr0lling...
niriop 3 weeks ago
@niriop
Nah, just an observation.
VilanAlarga 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
REALITY CHECK ALREADY CLEARED UP THIS NON-ISSUE ABOUT THE NEWSLETTERS.
SEARCH IN YOU TUBE FOR "REALITY CHECK - IS RON PAUL A RACIST"
..... truth is a bitch..... Ron Paul is not a racist.... at all.
D10SdelFutbol 1 month ago
@viper10011 Operating a racist newsletter for ten years? Well me and the black community won't get over it. I'm not mad at Ron Paul but hes never going to be president for what he's done
Malcom123X 1 month ago
He didn't write them. It has been debunked:
/watch?v=95CagSkXZYc&feature=player_embedded
fox19(dot)com/story/16458700/reality-check-the-name-of-a-mystery-writer-of-one-of-ron-pauls-racist-newsletters
opszanski 1 month ago
@opszanski He admitted to writing them
niriop 1 month ago
@niriop He admitted to publishing his writings in certain articles about economics and monetary policy. No one is saying he never wrote in them but the reality is a lot less exciting then you're indicating.
opszanski 1 month ago
@opszanski Texas Daily Star, 1996: "Dr. Paul denied suggestions that he was a racist and said he was not evoking stereotypes when he wrote the columns."
niriop 1 month ago
@niriop Texas Monthly, 2001: “I could never say this in the campaign, but those words weren’t really written by me. It wasn’t my language at all. Other people help me with my newsletter as I travel around . . . I actually really wanted to try to explain that it doesn’t come from me directly, but they [campaign aides] said that’s too confusing."
opszanski 1 month ago
@opszanski Bullshit; why did he admit to writing them in the first place? And how can you blame aides for you admitting to writing racially inflamatory stuff?
That makes no sense, and even if it works out that way, that still means he's lied repeatedly.
niriop 1 month ago
@niriop He didn't "blame" them, he was giving an explanation. Don't be so hypersensitive.
If you look at the two sources I gave above, his explanation in 2001, and a mixture of many other suggestive elements, it becomes obvious to even the most simple minded person what happened.
opszanski 1 month ago
@opszanski Nope, sounds like he's putting the blame on them tacitly, as with that Jon Huntsman tweet earlier and anything else that ever goes wrong.
So he admitted to writing racially inflamatory articles in order to...what? Why did he do such a stupid thing? He deserves credit alone for that, and knowingly letting racists print under his name. Fucking dumbass.
And I've remembered you: the Paultard who claims not to be a Ron Paul supporter who goes around defending Paul all day.
niriop 1 month ago
@niriop Thank you for demonstrating your unbias and objective judgement.
Don't you have a good memory (you know there two 2 people arguing to each other all day)?
If your going to be a idiot again and call "bullshit" on everything before giving information its proper consideration then there's no point in me arguing with you. If, however, you're open to the possibility that you might be wrong (I know, it's unthinkable) then I'll give you the other side of the argument for your consideration.
opszanski 1 month ago
@opszanski Says a Paultard...and I am being objective: what Lord Paul says doesn't add up in the slightest.
The thing is, its impossible to go forward until Paul confronts what he said in 1996; until then, my conclusion is: racist scumbag.
"giving information its proper consideration" I have, and my conclusion: bullshit.
Is there nothing your divine god is wrong on? Can't you just see that what has come out just doesn't add up? Will you ever admit he's a proven liar?
niriop 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@niriop Of course he's wrong (on a lot). Haven't we had this conversation before?
"'giving information its proper consideration' I have, and my conclusion: bullshit."
" its impossible to go forward until Paul confronts what he said in 1996; until then, my conclusion is: racist scumbag."
This doesn't seem contradictory?
opszanski 1 month ago
@opszanski "This doesn't seem contradictory?" *signs* Fucking idiot...why bother? [shoots self]
niriop 1 month ago
@niriop Obviously you don't (or can't) understand my point so let me break it down for you:
1. You said you are giving information proper consideration.
2. This implies you think your objective and properly judge new information and balance possibilities through reasoning.
3. You then state that your conclusion is fixed on 'racist scumbag" until he addresses his 1996 comments.
4. This implies that you don't balance possibilities since you unnecessarily refuse to "go forward".
Contradiction
opszanski 1 month ago
@opszanski No contradiction: I considered your claims, dismissed them, and merely returned to my original position. I'm still open to new evidence, which may or may not negate or lessen that position, but you have failed to provide me with such information. Hence: Paul is a racist scumbag, you are a moron. The former I feel has an ice cube in the planetary's core's chance of being disproven from the evidence as yet presented, the latter, erm, not so much. So, please, engage...
niriop 1 month ago
@niriop You said "its impossible", that's not considering anything.
"but you have failed to provide me with such information. Hence: Paul is a racist scumbag"
??? Since when is the onus on the defendant to disprove an unproven accusation? I've given you 2 good links that should show it's unproven at the very least. If you want to know the logic I used then say so but it will take a lot of these comment boxes.
opszanski 1 month ago
@opszanski That's an is/ought fallacy.
And I reject those links as inconsequential. "If you want to know the logic I used then say so but it will take a lot of these comment boxes" What the fuck are you talking about Paultard? You've failed to give me anything that says otherwise, so give me the evidence. I severely doubt it will disprove them.
Here's my own footage of him taking full credit: watch?v=_m-RhKBfb2g, watch?v=eW755u5460A and watch?v=HL4H7JlMCfE
niriop 1 month ago
@niriop I've given you TWO links that should call into question what your saying. I've already seen those videos and they don't prove anything. On the contrary, they actually raise objections. Nobody said he never wrote in them, the question is if he wrote the racist parts. Why would he openly promote a racist newsletter? Why did he never mention the racism angle in any of his responses. The 3rd link happened before the racist parts came out in 1988.
watch?v=ngcn9xQ-3BA
watch?v=i3EADdr-5AY
opszanski 1 month ago
@opszanski "Why would he openly promote a racist newsletter?" Because it didn't occur to him that it'd bite it in the arse until later, then he lied about it. Look: either he wrote them (which to me is obvious), or he knowingly allowed racist material publish under his name (and he lied about), for which he also employs responsibility.
"The 3rd link happened before the racist parts came out in 1988" The newsletters have a lot more stuff than just racism: homophobia, AIDS denialism...
niriop 1 month ago
@niriop I'm sorry, I didn't word it properly. But everyone agrees that the racism, homophobia, anti-semitism, etc. all started in 1988. The newsletter had been publishing since the 70s and it wasn't until '88 that these things started to appear. You say that it's obvious he wrote them. No it isn't because it has been confirmed James Powell wrote during that time and had much of the same racist tone found elsewhere.
current(dot)com/10vlakc
opszanski 1 month ago
@opszanski Actually, the nuttiness stretches back to 1978. I discovered an archive with all sort of inflamatory bullshit. To say Ron Paul didn't write even a bit of this, or even know about it is bullshit.
And that's yet another story change: Lew Rockwell was originally named and blamed. So at this point, all I see is a cross-section of lies, blame games and fuck ups, and even if he didn't write a single fucking word (which is *complete* bullshit), he is still responsible for it all.
niriop 1 month ago
@niriop Bullshit. Give me the website that showed there was racism and bigotry before 1988. There are strong reasons to suggest Lew Rockwell wrote racist newsletters, and now we see that another person was behind suspicious newsletter at that time. Your reasoning is that this is a blame game? Yeah, Reason Magazine is behind making these excuses and some other RP fan is behind manufacturing the newsletter with James Powell name. A case can be made he holds responsibility, but this is a witch
hunt
opszanski 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@opszanski It shall be with you within a minute.
"Your reasoning is that this is a blame game?" The fact is that he owned up, then denied it, blamed someone else, now there's someone else being blamed, even though various inflammatory stuff was spread throughout all the newsletters. So what if the "worst" stuff is between 1988-92? That doesn't say anything at all. It still had HIS signature in HIS NL
"but this is a witch hunt" Wow, making someone bear responsibility is a witch hunt
niriop 1 month ago
@niriop check the fox reality check for real author behind the controvential 9 letters of all 200 published
tenebriasz 1 month ago
@tenebriasz Actually, an archive of fifty has been uncovered with all sorts of fucking loopy loopiness stretching from 1978 to 1995.
niriop 1 month ago
@niriop links my friend ;]
tenebriasz 1 month ago
@niriop
You are deluded. But perhaps a few facts may get through the crack dreams.
pithy.butnowyouknow . net/the-facts-about-ron-pauls-newsletters-and-the-racist-articles/
deadlinelive . info/2011/12/23/ron-paul-newsletters-separating-the-truth-from-vicious-pc-media-propaganda/
dailypaul . com/193306/ron-paul-newsletters-fact-from-fiction
VilanAlarga 3 weeks ago
@Malcom123X well another you tube comment told me so. besides he apologized said those where not his positions and moved on maby you guys should to instead of still talking about things that happened 20 years ago.
viper10011 1 month ago
People WAKE UP, Cenk may or may not be"MSM aligned", but that DOES NOT mean that he's exempt from stupid non-citating reporting. Go back to the 1997 beginnings of ALL the newsletters. It quotes 'mystery, anonymous sources', and knew who the author was, BUT wouldn't say who.
MontajBlaze 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Oh, btw, people keep an eye out for Ben Swann's report tonight on the newsletters. He's saying what WAS OFFICIAL before 3 weeks ago, and is now considered 'propaganda from Paul users'. There was only one newsletter, it went out in a special edition considered 'separate' from Ron Paul, it had 8-10 sentences of racist remarks(out of a couple thousand pages, no wonder it didn't get noticed by Paul), In the OFFICIAL PDFs of them that people use so much, the author's byline is cut off...
MontajBlaze 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RonPaulRonPaul___RonPaulRonPau l___RonPaul___RonPaulRonPaul RonPaulRonPaul___RonPaulRonPau l___RonPaul___RonPaulRonPaul _______RonPaul___Ron_______Pau l___RonPaul__________RonPaul _______RonPaul___Ron_______Pau l___RonPaul__________RonPaul RonPaulRonPaul___Ron_______Pau l___RonPaul___RonPaulRonPaul RonPaul__________Ron_______Pau l___RonPaul___RonPaul_______ RonPaulRonPaul___RonPaulRonPau l___RonPaul___RonPaulRonPaul RonPaulRonPaul___RonPaulRonPau l___RonPaul___RonPaulRonPaul
Silverlin212 1 month ago
Wow Cenk, I expected more of you. Your analysis makes no sense at all. Those are ALL one line quotes. You cannot judge anyone or anything based on a bunch of one line quotes put together. Dont you know that? I thought you understood the power of EDITING. Aren't you a reporter? OF COURSE you can't read quotes out of context. OF COURSE you have to read the whole article. This could be just like the SHIRLEY SHERROD case!! Didn't TYT cover the SHIRLEY SHERROD story? Didnt you learn anything from it?
zenartanis 1 month ago 2
I don't believe he is racist at all, but say Ron Paul is. that would be terrible and it does not sound like him at all. however even if he was why don't you all look at his positions on issues and see that the Racist Ron Paul does a pretty poor job of acting like a racist as his positions are the most friendly to minorities in the US. so Even if you believe he is a racist you should still vote for him because his policies would be the most beneficial to all races.
cpaulson21 1 month ago
@cpaulson21 that makes no sense
ricorico06 1 month ago
all the quotes you gave from ron paul himself you did not give the source so we can check it out ourselves... your just like the rest of the main stream media Cenk twisting stuff to suit your ideology. i would like to see the stuff your talking about how about you show where you got that stuff from? non of the things ron paul said according to you was racist non of it said anything about race... your only able to associate it with race due to the racist comments in the disavowed news letters
cpaulson21 1 month ago
@TheYoungTurks I saw this interesting report on the Ron Paul newsletters and I thought I would share it with you guys and your viewers/bloggers. It was by Ben Swann of WXIX. His show is called reality check. I hope everyone checks it out.
wwwDOTwxixDOTcom/story/16449477/reality-check-the-story-behind-the-ron-paul-newsletters
ultimus1998 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ultimus1998 I'm glad you are showing this Turk clowns what a REAL JOURNALIST IS. - Mr. Ben Swann.
D10SdelFutbol 1 month ago
There's a reason racist hate groups donate money to Ron Paul. What do you expect?
He's a Texan hick. Suprised he's not in the Klan.
demanvanhetstokbrood 1 month ago
@demanvanhetstokbrood he didnt even right the letters he was proven not guilty in court 20 years ago
viper10011 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@demanvanhetstokbrood Ron Paul was born in PA.
And PEOPLE ARE FREE TO BE WHATEVER THEY WANT TO BE,.. EVEN RACISTS.
This is The Land of Liberty, if you don't like it move to China.
D10SdelFutbol 1 month ago
@crashmidget15 I really hope there is a complete economic collapse so that we can finally get rid of this unfair, money based, racist political system.
kingcherub11 1 month ago
this doesnt even sound like ron paul. im confused
ATowns2008 1 month ago
*sigh* I was kind of hoping a while back he wouldn't be quite as bad as the people he's running against. Turns out he's just as bad, but in different ways.
TheCreeperhunter 1 month ago
All the dislikes = Ron Paul cultists!
deeppurple28 1 month ago
Maybe he was talking about actual animals.
Those bears are very fleet footed so keep a gun.
andywattbulb 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@trolololoz you anti american troll,.. you wouldn't know what the truth was if it was sitting on your face.
D10SdelFutbol 1 month ago
@trolololoz The turth is YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT.
D10SdelFutbol 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@D10SdelFutbol another troll who was reduced to argue like a 10 year old.
next!
D10SdelFutbol 1 month ago
@spichur what?... really?.... you are that retarded?
D10SdelFutbol 1 month ago
@AstroWaldo You are just too lazy to study Ron Paul's positions, it's easier for a troll like you to call him a liar.
D10SdelFutbol 1 month ago
@deeppurple28 Now supporting the US Constitution is a cult?
When did you stop loving our liberty loving America?
D10SdelFutbol 1 month ago
@D10SdelFutbol The Ron Paul cult swallows everything that their Messiah Spews! If wRong Paul says that the sky is red, the wRongBots will defiantly defend him on that as well!
deeppurple28 1 month ago
@deeppurple28 ... it's not about Ron Paul you dumb ass,.. is about protecting our US Constitution... wtf is wrong with you?
D10SdelFutbol 1 month ago
@D10SdelFutbol Yes protecting the same constitution that he ignores when it comes to a woman's uterus! wRong Paul the retard wants to abolish Roe V Wade and allow states to dictate what a Woman should do with here uterus! YOU TRULY ARE A MORON!!
deeppurple28 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@deeppurple28 I can't even begin to express how WRONG you are. LIFE BEGINS AT CONCEPTION IS A SCIENTIFIC FACT.
We need to protect LIFE if we ever want to protect Liberty (two concepts you clearly do not understand). Rode vs Wade allows you to kill a baby in the third trimester, it's murder of a human being. But Dr. Paul just wants the Federal Government out of the issue and leave it to the states, always taking into consideration situations like rape, incest, etc.
U mindless troll
D10SdelFutbol 1 month ago
@hampusheh I'm a hispanic minority and to me the whole Racist Newsletter thing is a NON ISSUE.
A racist is easy to see, and Ron Paul is not a racist at all.
Even if he were (which he isn't),.. .WHO GIVES A FLYING FUCK? HIS CONSTITUTIONAL POLICIES ARE AWESOME AND WHAT AMERICAN NEEDS.
D10SdelFutbol 1 month ago
Ron Paul may be good on economic issues. He may be better than average on personal liberty issues. But he is horrendous on national defense.
hey53t0 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hey53t0 So now you know more than our troops about foreign policy? BECAUSE DR. PAUL GETS MORE DONATIONS FROM THE MILITARY THAN ALL THE GOP CANDIDATES PUT TOGETHER ... EVEN MORE THAN OBAMA.
Deal with that fact.
D10SdelFutbol 1 month ago
@daguzify Crazy? .... geez.. you dumb asses have been reduced to argue like 10 year olds.
D10SdelFutbol 1 month ago
@Overfl00d This page is full of anti Constitution and traitors.
D10SdelFutbol 1 month ago
@bumfire007 No dude, we are awake and looking at reality right in the face. You just don't understand what LIBERTY is.
Someday you'll wake up.
D10SdelFutbol 1 month ago
Now Im not voting for Ron Paul because he's a........ wait hold up a second....... this is the media and the media ALWAYS LIE AND PUT SLANDER ON PPL THEY DONT LIKE. Or they could have brought something from the past that is meaningless now.
Basty135 1 month ago
Ron Paul truly is a racist and an anti Semite!
hey53t0 1 month ago
@hey53t0 Ron Paul is crazy
imaStonesFan 1 month ago
@imaStonesFan Ron [RIP] Paul is so stupid, he doesn't even know how to buy a suit that fits.
hey53t0 1 month ago
@hey53t0 lol
imaStonesFan 1 month ago
@hey53t0 you trolls have been reduced to arguing like 10 year olds.
D10SdelFutbol 1 month ago
@D10SdelFutbol you need to let r0NpaUL stick his hand up your ass to check your prostate
hey53t0 1 month ago
@hey53t0 And you are truly a liar.
D10SdelFutbol 1 month ago