CO2 absorbs infrared radiation, such as that reflected by the Earth. This means CO2 in the atmosphere causes the atmosphere to warm up. More CO2 = more warming. This has been known for many decades.
Whatever else you may be, Atoyota, you're not a climate scientist and you won't fool anybody who has studied this subject.
Now tell me how the NASA sent astronauts on the moon and how they got back completly healthy..
dourpil 1 year ago
@dourpil Gold foil shielding perhaps.
Tamalain 1 year ago
@dourpil did it ever occur to you that the suits block some of the radiation ? or did you think they were just for show ?
dellisaheapofshit 11 months ago
@dourpil Theirs holes in the atmosphear...
IINesasta 3 months ago
Amazing! Meteoric crash in Israel! Experts still do not know what it is:
/watch?v=VEhTuOCS3i4
elior2000 1 year ago
someone's a wall-e fan.
reinux 2 years ago
fucking modern design
ilhadosmacacos 2 years ago
Amazing info
1:34 Zomg, fuking gorgeous
TNTJahv1er 2 years ago
Fascinating stuff!!!
JohnHMedia 2 years ago 2
Energy does not disappear, it changes form.
Which is why the radient energy acts to expand the outer atmosphere "heating it up" and inhibiting ultraviolet dissipation (greenhouse).
CO2 is a symptom but not a cause. Our sun has more to do with climate change than we do.
Atoyota 2 years ago
CO2 absorbs infrared radiation, such as that reflected by the Earth. This means CO2 in the atmosphere causes the atmosphere to warm up. More CO2 = more warming. This has been known for many decades.
Whatever else you may be, Atoyota, you're not a climate scientist and you won't fool anybody who has studied this subject.
Squagnut 2 years ago
Water Vapor by far has more impact than CO2.
Increased levels in CO2 do affect dissipation but not at the levels we see indicated by rise in temps.
CO2 levels are also a result of displacement more-so than combustion fuels, which is why I consider it more a symptom than an active cause.
The bottom line (which I underline) is that a carbon focus is ridiculous and a waste of resource. Also that the science is incomplete.
Atoyota 2 years ago
Like I said, you're not a climate scientist.
Squagnut 2 years ago
nor are you, or if you are... you need to go back to school.
Atoyota 2 years ago
Thankfully, you're not my education adviser either.
Squagnut 2 years ago
take a look at my most recent comment of the Nasa site, and the most recent video "NASA | Science for a Hungry World: Part 1"
That shows how ecosystems affect climate. (note I never did say man does not, just that the Sun is the largest contribution to climate (energy)).
Actually if the UN had more people with my views, we'd have a better chance with our future. Instead we are doomed.
Take all the CO2 out of our atmosphere, and we'd still have a dissipation problem.
Atoyota 2 years ago
splendido e istruttivo..grazie..francesco.-
zaza90100 2 years ago
And the republicans are saying the US government can't run anything.
carrierexchange 2 years ago
i love nasa !
coolchanga 2 years ago
wait. Wall-e EVE?
mrR0ck4 2 years ago