@lilxsmoky Completely incorrect. You are talking out of your ass. stock subaru is faster in a straight line than a stock evo. And the turbo isnt bigger, its just running more boost. 19.5psi on a 2.0L engine, subaru is 14.5psi on a 2.5L engine. It comes down to its power and weight and gearing.
@MTD369 Check again, stock for stock there is literally a 0.1 sec difference between the two, with the exact same driver mod. As for this race, the STI needs a better tune and it would've been a bigger win. But either way, this video actually isn't proving anything for either car, because both are not completely stock, nor are they both modded. Still entertaining though.
@MTD369 actually your wrong too. an evo is faster in a quarter mile by very little and yes its because its gearing.... an sti has to shift too many times. and they both dyno about the same and weigh about the same. the sti does put more crank hp down but the only reason the evo will put more WHP down is because an evo has a better AWD system and has a less of a drivetrain loss.
@MrJpierson .1 seconds in the 1/4 is within error bars of being equal. Sti is quicker on the bottom end. Compare whp numbers and both come out to be the same 220-240. You cant argue otherwise unless you have tested 10 evos and 10 stis on the same dyno on the same day. The turbo on the Evo is physically bigger, mainly because its a twin-scroll setu. and yes your correct on the FMIC lag/throttle response issue but becomes more lively because of the twin scroll and EL headers.
@MTD369 i understand no evo or sti is the same just like any car but... do you know what twin scroll means? it has no factor in making the turbo larger. all twinscroll is is basically it splits the exhaust housing so there is less spacs which actually creates a smaller exhaust housing... but increases spool time.. the compressor housing is larger on an sti. i would know i owned a wrx with full sti setup and an sti and now i own an evo.
@MrJpierson Im talking about the housing of the turbo. Thats what i meant when i said physically bigger. Supporting both scrolls independently takes up more space on the turbo housing side. Its all over evom and nasioc. They have side by sides, its pretty clear (evo8 twin scroll turbo, and sti turbo). Evo turbo is much bigger. I can send you the link if you want. Twin scroll DECREASES spool time. for owning 3 turbo cars u should know. you have your shit backwards
@MTD369 oh shit i just saw i put increase i was about to go off like i alreayd know it decreases spool time lol. im done arguing obviously we both understand i just saw i missed typed from my previous statement.
@lilxsmoky actually your wrong yes evo is faster first of all. second if anything the sti should have an advantage because it has a top mount no tubing means alot less lag. and second the evo has a 16g and an sti has an 18g. check your shit before you post an incorrect statement........ kids....
i agree kinda pathetic that the sti only beat him by what looks to be a car or so, but whose to really say that the evo was completely stock, im sure he was, but even a cai woulda helped him a decent amount, or an exhaust even. I love sti's but evo's are fast little bastards!
Yes I do, all US spec STi's are 2.5L. I do love Evo's too, if I had a lot of money I'd have both on top of a few other cars. After I'm done with college though I'm planning on getting a 03 cobra or c5 z06 as a weekend warrior.
Actually just depends on the driver. I lost by a lil less than a car to a Evo 9 SE W/ carbon fiber driveshaft, turboback exhaust, EBC, tuned to 26psi with Flat foot shifting with my stock tune STi with just a catback. It was a 2nd-4th gear pull, and I'd have to say it was pretty embarassing for an evo.
i like both cars so i dont care what wins >:)
masterevoixMR 6 months ago
evo comes with a bigger turbo and a front mount* ofcource its faster then a stock subby/////
lilxsmoky 1 year ago
@lilxsmoky Completely incorrect. You are talking out of your ass. stock subaru is faster in a straight line than a stock evo. And the turbo isnt bigger, its just running more boost. 19.5psi on a 2.0L engine, subaru is 14.5psi on a 2.5L engine. It comes down to its power and weight and gearing.
MTD369 9 months ago
@MTD369 Check again, stock for stock there is literally a 0.1 sec difference between the two, with the exact same driver mod. As for this race, the STI needs a better tune and it would've been a bigger win. But either way, this video actually isn't proving anything for either car, because both are not completely stock, nor are they both modded. Still entertaining though.
Nutz4Tutz 7 months ago
@MTD369 actually your wrong too. an evo is faster in a quarter mile by very little and yes its because its gearing.... an sti has to shift too many times. and they both dyno about the same and weigh about the same. the sti does put more crank hp down but the only reason the evo will put more WHP down is because an evo has a better AWD system and has a less of a drivetrain loss.
MrJpierson 7 months ago
@MrJpierson .1 seconds in the 1/4 is within error bars of being equal. Sti is quicker on the bottom end. Compare whp numbers and both come out to be the same 220-240. You cant argue otherwise unless you have tested 10 evos and 10 stis on the same dyno on the same day. The turbo on the Evo is physically bigger, mainly because its a twin-scroll setu. and yes your correct on the FMIC lag/throttle response issue but becomes more lively because of the twin scroll and EL headers.
MTD369 7 months ago
@MTD369 i understand no evo or sti is the same just like any car but... do you know what twin scroll means? it has no factor in making the turbo larger. all twinscroll is is basically it splits the exhaust housing so there is less spacs which actually creates a smaller exhaust housing... but increases spool time.. the compressor housing is larger on an sti. i would know i owned a wrx with full sti setup and an sti and now i own an evo.
MrJpierson 7 months ago
@MrJpierson Im talking about the housing of the turbo. Thats what i meant when i said physically bigger. Supporting both scrolls independently takes up more space on the turbo housing side. Its all over evom and nasioc. They have side by sides, its pretty clear (evo8 twin scroll turbo, and sti turbo). Evo turbo is much bigger. I can send you the link if you want. Twin scroll DECREASES spool time. for owning 3 turbo cars u should know. you have your shit backwards
MTD369 7 months ago
@MTD369 oh shit i just saw i put increase i was about to go off like i alreayd know it decreases spool time lol. im done arguing obviously we both understand i just saw i missed typed from my previous statement.
MrJpierson 7 months ago
@lilxsmoky actually your wrong yes evo is faster first of all. second if anything the sti should have an advantage because it has a top mount no tubing means alot less lag. and second the evo has a 16g and an sti has an 18g. check your shit before you post an incorrect statement........ kids....
MrJpierson 7 months ago
thers no wa that vo is stock i promise you, r lse the sti driver seriosly cant drive at all
KAS470 1 year ago
are you serious a stock evo im pretty sure i see exhaust on the evo and a stock evo wouldnt be shooting flames at the light either
jeepguyblk 2 years ago
@jeepguyblk
It was the STI shooting the flames...
daFBi 1 year ago
i agree kinda pathetic that the sti only beat him by what looks to be a car or so, but whose to really say that the evo was completely stock, im sure he was, but even a cai woulda helped him a decent amount, or an exhaust even. I love sti's but evo's are fast little bastards!
blomblom123 2 years ago
Yes I do, all US spec STi's are 2.5L. I do love Evo's too, if I had a lot of money I'd have both on top of a few other cars. After I'm done with college though I'm planning on getting a 03 cobra or c5 z06 as a weekend warrior.
Nightkast22 2 years ago
Actually just depends on the driver. I lost by a lil less than a car to a Evo 9 SE W/ carbon fiber driveshaft, turboback exhaust, EBC, tuned to 26psi with Flat foot shifting with my stock tune STi with just a catback. It was a 2nd-4th gear pull, and I'd have to say it was pretty embarassing for an evo.
Nightkast22 2 years ago 2
oh wow guy....sti ftw? lol
come on - he's modded and he shoulda beat the evo by more.
good job evo
SubieDood 2 years ago
That stage 2 STi didn't beat the evo by a whole lot. Needs driver mod.
csautter 3 years ago 12
nice.. u beat a stock car
adl16v 4 years ago 3
sti ftw
desireGTS 4 years ago
STI ripped that shit up.... good job
powertsx 4 years ago 6
don't act like you haven't seen fire before
enjoibear52 4 years ago
hahaha
tfrostholm 4 years ago