@BSANONYMOUS Not everybody came out of Africa;most human genetic variation still exists in Africa.Check out the HapMap Project,the Genographic Project,and the Human Genome Project.And also Google "genetic anthropology","genetic bottleneck","inbreeding depression",and "cline".
Islamic colonization (and raiding) of European states preceded European colonization. Also the Islamic slave trade, in black Africans, was larger in scale and length of time than the Atlantic slave trade. It actually continues today. Does this go unnoticed because those doing the slaving are not white? Either there's a monumental double standard here, or you might not be aware of this information.
To some degree, I understand your positions on these obviously divisive issues. I will even concur with you on the point that in many ways the societal structures of the African peoples mirrored those of the Europeans. However, you must come to realize that these rebuttals you offer come across as nebulous, biased, and racist. You must understand that the racist viewpoints you hold are not even made ambiguous by your extensive vocabulary. Few people will find common ground if you are so blatant.
Hey kid, if youre reading this, I'm not mad at you for your young beliefs. You sound smart, but Nudiford is correct when he says that you are not wise enough to speak intelligently about this topic.
you fail to mention one difference between the colonialists and the african tribes, written language, history and books, things the tribesmen didn't have.
But I must apologize for the Palin comment. Youre not so bad. Take your moustache... it makes you look... uh, pubescent. This is not exactly a compliment, but its better than what some would say. Some might say your moustache looks like a fuzzy cum-catcher. It completes your all-around, general faggotry; like the way you say Eko Renaissance at the beginning of this video. But not me. I wouldn't say that.
As a person who tends to read what I refute (like reading Jared Diamond's God-awful shit) I don't respect others who refuse to do the same. Additionally, when you simply state POOR PEOPLE--as in "case closed"--you show your ignorance. You can do this, but at least show you have an understanding for why Jared Taylor (and others) do not find this argument particularly compelling. At every turn you simply talk like a dumb kid.
I listen to your idiot videos and read your replies in the comments and one thing is clear: You have not paid the price of admission to discuss this subject intelligently. You seem to have just enough white/arab/whatever in your blood to be upset about these things and wish to articulate your thoughts. But it is clear you have no learning and your bias and emotion oozes everywhere; making your distorted logic and selective fact-finding almost hilarious in its schizophrenia.
EkoRenaissance: Your immature, ignorant and pretentious videos are truly an asset to the white separatist cause. As a proud white person I thank you. I also like your glasses. You look like something Sarah Palin left in her toilet bowl.
Yes, Tragic. I'm so ashamed. But I love it. I have a weakness for humor. And you really do look like something Sarah Palin left in her toilet... and just as smart.
How would I do you a favor by removing these videos? YOU clicked on my link. YOU watched the video. YOU clicked reply. YOU typed that stupid shit, and now YOU are reading MY reply.
What does that make you? Full of shit. You can't resist... or you know I'm right.
Now do me a favor and comment back. Attention=dissemination.
Dude, I couldn't have typed "loads of comments", considering that I'm posting this on a Blackberry. And everything I've said has been relevant. I'm sorry if YOU'RE dense. As in you this time.
You are tragic. Control your reality before you go about claiming that your better due to feeble categorizations when you couldn't begin to know true ability.
Never once did I say your name or refer or inducate to you in any way-and not to mention that I did use remote generalities such as "they"-and hence, I find it interesting that you assumed that I was referring to you.
Well - the last like 10 comments revolved around our - whatever you want to call it. And I really do have the impression you just wanted to hide that by posting loads of comments. You some sort of priest now? "my voice is powerful"?
My voice is powerful and I will allow these children to attack me until they fade one by one with an excellent and compelling argument, a good deal of views, and lots of controversy in my wake. Then I feed off of the subsequent attention to help people understand the truth.
ah right - you just keep spamming the site to hide our discussion? Question is who the children are. But you have a point about wasting time. (stop calling me these people - I'm not schizophrenic)
Your treatment of the unsanitary conditions (relative to now) created by the urbanization of the commercial and industrial revolutions, as a sufficient condition for equating with the advancement of hunter gatherer societies, is as ludicrous as it is analogous, to the notion that twenty first century society is equal to a hunter gatherer society because of the disproportionate impact on global warming by burning fossil fuels compared to campfires around huts.
You are blissfully ignorant on the chronological order basic historical events. The last real Crusades were last fought in the 13th century.
I found your painting of Europe with broad strokes particularly comical where you referenced Anglo Saxon involvment with the Inquisitions. The inquisitions were in Portugal, Spain and Italy in the timeframe you referenced.
Britain, which is who I assume you mean by Anglo, was protestant well before this time and I don't know of any inquisition there.
The Iron rule of Western European religions were about as morally decrepit as the deficit of logical inquiry by hunter gatherer witch doctors.
Of course, the case being made by people of Jared Taylor's ilk are not that more intelligence necessarily equates with higher moral behavior but in a general sense do show that higher IQs have greater propensity to engage in moral behavior .
Of course the statistical evidence is abundant showing clear genetic differences in IQ across races.
I laugh every single time I read these posts, because I obviously scare these people, and infuriate them enough to take significant amounts of time out of their day to pay me mind.
You talking about me? Scared me? Significant amounts of time? I looked up a definition of "race" in Britannica online, yes. Other than that, no more time than the typing. Sad answers. But then, hey... quod erat demonstrandum
I will never capitulate myself to contrived notions of a convenient reality. I am all for less categorizations and allowing us to prove ourselves one by one. Only a coward would depend on trite and irrelevant distinctions to define who and what they are.
Actually, you're not very misinformed. Of course intelligences differ between social classes. I was referring to intellectual potential, which is generally equal across the board. I don't believe for a moment that Jews are fundamentally smarter than anyone else.
We still differ on the nature/nurture thingy, and I guess I won't convert you so I won't even try. "Twins and what they tell us about who we are" is a good, balanced, brief good that can do this much better than myself. Jews may well be more intelligent than the rest of us. Some north-east-Asians simply are! We whites have to put up with that. Why can't you?
And you want more prove science has to yield to "political correctness" these days? Well - you remember the outrage caused by Watson's remarks on Africans recently? (he sure didn't mince his words, I was pretty shocked as well) Tell me, when the Economist ran an article according to which Jews have an average IQ of 110 compared with the general US population, why did THAT claim not provoke any negative reaction at all? Abstracting from the groups involved, where is the difference?
Actually, you're absolutely right, but its instigated by humanity and minor genomic differences are negligible and irrelevant, was my point. In other words, you are not intrinsically smarter than me.
Well - if any individual tells you he's smarter than you simply cos he's white, chances are this particular person is not. However, there may be differences in AVERAGE intelligence between groups. I haven't personally done the studies, but if they show what Watson/Lynn claim they show, I tend to believe them until proven wrong.
Besides, I assume you're all nurture, no nature when it comes to IQ? Well, there's pretty widespread consensus these days that both matter, the ratio is still disputed but often cited as roughly 50/50. Studies of twins reared apart in totally different settings offer evidence that is extremely hard to argue with.
For the amount of scientific journals and quotes by scientists I utilized in my arguments, you wouldn't think that you people would be so hard-headed.
All mankind is of one species. Zoologically, human races are all mutually interfertile subspecies—i.e., breeding populations that differ in the relative frequencies of one or more genes. Although the variety of possible traits is practically limitless, random mating is not the case.
I assure you, biologists and anthropologists do as well. They have to. There needs to be some sort of term to describe the different groups/races/... Many Asians cannot digest milk (if not most, lacking the enzyme). Africans have a different brain shape and structure. The list is pretty long, but it's also pointless when you just won't accept the obvious.
Druenwhateveriplayd&dtoomuch: actually, my position is 100% valid, and you cited no facts nor do you entertain the credibility to effectively refute it. Stastisticians, doctors, psychologists, and analysts use "pooulations" or "ethnicities". Anthropologists (those who study humanity) and biologists do not. Look it up.
I don't think I know anything. There's some things I do know and some things I don't, and I am blessed enough to be able to distinguish the two.
You sure THINK you know a lot. Well, you're confusing biology and politics. You're in good company in doing this, plenty of liberals are doing so these days. Doesn't make it any more correct though.
...not scientifically correct anyway, though perhaps "politically correct" - for whatever that's worth. Well - the "idiotic concept" as you call it always has been and still is accepted as a scientific fact. It was not borne of some sort of nationalism (or any of the other sources you mentioned). For the sake of "political correctness", scientists today prefer to speak of "populations", or "ethnic groups". It's just another term, not a different concept.
Say about LEGAL equality, non-discrimination and politics what you like. But don't mix it up with biology. Two different fields, one's nothing to do with the other, and anyone in his right mind understands this and sees right through this. Next time round, arm yourself with a convincing case as opposed to a suit and glasses.
Tragically, as eloquent as your delivery is, it's probably your advanced vocabulary that's preventing people from sticking with you throughout the message. At 6:33, I'm thinking that you and I are on the same page, but I'm going to keep watching.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
dont you have any thing better to do than say stupid shit nobody cares what you have to say other tha the nigger group naacp or al sharpcoon or jesse jackcoon.
And, apparently, you're interested enough to log in, press "comment", type that entire illiterate waste of time, click on "post comment", wait for it to process, and watch it post.
Your behavior is pathetic, and I'm sure that your adolescence won't allow you to care for another five years.
I think there are several terms he uses in this video that have more letters than your vocabulary has words. David and Goliath was a myth, mental midget. Perhaps you should steer clear, because this gentleman is out of your league.
@BSANONYMOUS Not everybody came out of Africa;most human genetic variation still exists in Africa.Check out the HapMap Project,the Genographic Project,and the Human Genome Project.And also Google "genetic anthropology","genetic bottleneck","inbreeding depression",and "cline".
anarksee 10 months ago
My video:
Race Exist - How could you ever doubt it!
Watch it!
MrHerrIQ 1 year ago
Islamic colonization (and raiding) of European states preceded European colonization. Also the Islamic slave trade, in black Africans, was larger in scale and length of time than the Atlantic slave trade. It actually continues today. Does this go unnoticed because those doing the slaving are not white? Either there's a monumental double standard here, or you might not be aware of this information.
InsistOnDemocracy 1 year ago
Such a strong response, any reason why you didn't carry on watching?
Thirdoptionisthename 2 years ago
To some degree, I understand your positions on these obviously divisive issues. I will even concur with you on the point that in many ways the societal structures of the African peoples mirrored those of the Europeans. However, you must come to realize that these rebuttals you offer come across as nebulous, biased, and racist. You must understand that the racist viewpoints you hold are not even made ambiguous by your extensive vocabulary. Few people will find common ground if you are so blatant.
Davidgruntslayer 2 years ago
The kid looks like a miniature Barak Obama, lol.
Hey kid, if youre reading this, I'm not mad at you for your young beliefs. You sound smart, but Nudiford is correct when he says that you are not wise enough to speak intelligently about this topic.
strong8action 2 years ago
you fail to mention one difference between the colonialists and the african tribes, written language, history and books, things the tribesmen didn't have.
sspzkpfwvi 2 years ago
whered you take this one? your moms apartments hallway? left her living room for this one?
CharlieAftermath 3 years ago
But I must apologize for the Palin comment. Youre not so bad. Take your moustache... it makes you look... uh, pubescent. This is not exactly a compliment, but its better than what some would say. Some might say your moustache looks like a fuzzy cum-catcher. It completes your all-around, general faggotry; like the way you say Eko Renaissance at the beginning of this video. But not me. I wouldn't say that.
Nudiford 3 years ago
And don't miss this one either:
As a person who tends to read what I refute (like reading Jared Diamond's God-awful shit) I don't respect others who refuse to do the same. Additionally, when you simply state POOR PEOPLE--as in "case closed"--you show your ignorance. You can do this, but at least show you have an understanding for why Jared Taylor (and others) do not find this argument particularly compelling. At every turn you simply talk like a dumb kid.
Nudiford 3 years ago
And don't miss this:
I listen to your idiot videos and read your replies in the comments and one thing is clear: You have not paid the price of admission to discuss this subject intelligently. You seem to have just enough white/arab/whatever in your blood to be upset about these things and wish to articulate your thoughts. But it is clear you have no learning and your bias and emotion oozes everywhere; making your distorted logic and selective fact-finding almost hilarious in its schizophrenia.
Nudiford 3 years ago 2
EkoRenaissance: Your immature, ignorant and pretentious videos are truly an asset to the white separatist cause. As a proud white person I thank you. I also like your glasses. You look like something Sarah Palin left in her toilet bowl.
Nudiford 3 years ago 7
Did you really post this SAME sorry joke on TWO of my videos?
AND you called me immature and pretentious. Yet, you took the time to comment on TWO of my videos. RESTATING the same comment.
Tragic.
EkoRenaissance 3 years ago
Yes, Tragic. I'm so ashamed. But I love it. I have a weakness for humor. And you really do look like something Sarah Palin left in her toilet... and just as smart.
Nudiford 3 years ago 2
Seriously buddy you'd do yourself and us a favor by removing these pointless videos...
itsassimpleasthat 3 years ago 4
How would I do you a favor by removing these videos? YOU clicked on my link. YOU watched the video. YOU clicked reply. YOU typed that stupid shit, and now YOU are reading MY reply.
What does that make you? Full of shit. You can't resist... or you know I'm right.
Now do me a favor and comment back. Attention=dissemination.
EkoRenaissance 3 years ago
Wow. You're so full of - wait - knowledge? No, that's not it.
trustYTalways 3 years ago 10
Dude, I couldn't have typed "loads of comments", considering that I'm posting this on a Blackberry. And everything I've said has been relevant. I'm sorry if YOU'RE dense. As in you this time.
You are tragic. Control your reality before you go about claiming that your better due to feeble categorizations when you couldn't begin to know true ability.
EkoRenaissance 3 years ago
*Indicate.
EkoRenaissance 3 years ago
Never once did I say your name or refer or inducate to you in any way-and not to mention that I did use remote generalities such as "they"-and hence, I find it interesting that you assumed that I was referring to you.
EkoRenaissance 3 years ago
Well - the last like 10 comments revolved around our - whatever you want to call it. And I really do have the impression you just wanted to hide that by posting loads of comments. You some sort of priest now? "my voice is powerful"?
duenndruckpapier 3 years ago
My voice is powerful and I will allow these children to attack me until they fade one by one with an excellent and compelling argument, a good deal of views, and lots of controversy in my wake. Then I feed off of the subsequent attention to help people understand the truth.
There will be change.
EkoRenaissance 3 years ago
ah right - you just keep spamming the site to hide our discussion? Question is who the children are. But you have a point about wasting time. (stop calling me these people - I'm not schizophrenic)
duenndruckpapier 3 years ago
"My voice is powerful"
Thanks for the laugh. Is your junior high school moustache powerful as well?
I also liked where you said Jared Taylor was irrelevant. So irrelevant that you made four long winded videos about him.
ebeneezzer 3 years ago
Jared Taylor talks about multiculturalism. This is about "race". Are you admitting Jared Taylor is a racist?
In any case... I'm not spamming my own site. That was just SO gay.
And my mustache gets far more attention than you, even on lil ol racist youtube. So... I guess the answer is yes.
EkoRenaissance 3 years ago
I didn't mention race of multiculturalism once in my post so I have no idea where you are gettng that from.
That wasn't even a strawman argument - more like a whispy junior high school moustache man.
ebeneezzer 3 years ago
Your treatment of the unsanitary conditions (relative to now) created by the urbanization of the commercial and industrial revolutions, as a sufficient condition for equating with the advancement of hunter gatherer societies, is as ludicrous as it is analogous, to the notion that twenty first century society is equal to a hunter gatherer society because of the disproportionate impact on global warming by burning fossil fuels compared to campfires around huts.
LexPhilogus 3 years ago
You are blissfully ignorant on the chronological order basic historical events. The last real Crusades were last fought in the 13th century.
I found your painting of Europe with broad strokes particularly comical where you referenced Anglo Saxon involvment with the Inquisitions. The inquisitions were in Portugal, Spain and Italy in the timeframe you referenced.
Britain, which is who I assume you mean by Anglo, was protestant well before this time and I don't know of any inquisition there.
LexPhilogus 3 years ago
The Iron rule of Western European religions were about as morally decrepit as the deficit of logical inquiry by hunter gatherer witch doctors.
Of course, the case being made by people of Jared Taylor's ilk are not that more intelligence necessarily equates with higher moral behavior but in a general sense do show that higher IQs have greater propensity to engage in moral behavior .
Of course the statistical evidence is abundant showing clear genetic differences in IQ across races.
LexPhilogus 3 years ago
I laugh every single time I read these posts, because I obviously scare these people, and infuriate them enough to take significant amounts of time out of their day to pay me mind.
EkoRenaissance 3 years ago
You talking about me? Scared me? Significant amounts of time? I looked up a definition of "race" in Britannica online, yes. Other than that, no more time than the typing. Sad answers. But then, hey... quod erat demonstrandum
duenndruckpapier 3 years ago
I will never capitulate myself to contrived notions of a convenient reality. I am all for less categorizations and allowing us to prove ourselves one by one. Only a coward would depend on trite and irrelevant distinctions to define who and what they are.
EkoRenaissance 3 years ago
Actually, you're not very misinformed. Of course intelligences differ between social classes. I was referring to intellectual potential, which is generally equal across the board. I don't believe for a moment that Jews are fundamentally smarter than anyone else.
EkoRenaissance 3 years ago
We still differ on the nature/nurture thingy, and I guess I won't convert you so I won't even try. "Twins and what they tell us about who we are" is a good, balanced, brief good that can do this much better than myself. Jews may well be more intelligent than the rest of us. Some north-east-Asians simply are! We whites have to put up with that. Why can't you?
duenndruckpapier 3 years ago
And you want more prove science has to yield to "political correctness" these days? Well - you remember the outrage caused by Watson's remarks on Africans recently? (he sure didn't mince his words, I was pretty shocked as well) Tell me, when the Economist ran an article according to which Jews have an average IQ of 110 compared with the general US population, why did THAT claim not provoke any negative reaction at all? Abstracting from the groups involved, where is the difference?
duenndruckpapier 3 years ago
that is proof, of course, not prove... not that anyone cared on YT anyway
duenndruckpapier 3 years ago
Actually, you're absolutely right, but its instigated by humanity and minor genomic differences are negligible and irrelevant, was my point. In other words, you are not intrinsically smarter than me.
I agree that Tabula Raza is myopic.
EkoRenaissance 3 years ago
Well - if any individual tells you he's smarter than you simply cos he's white, chances are this particular person is not. However, there may be differences in AVERAGE intelligence between groups. I haven't personally done the studies, but if they show what Watson/Lynn claim they show, I tend to believe them until proven wrong.
duenndruckpapier 3 years ago
Besides, I assume you're all nurture, no nature when it comes to IQ? Well, there's pretty widespread consensus these days that both matter, the ratio is still disputed but often cited as roughly 50/50. Studies of twins reared apart in totally different settings offer evidence that is extremely hard to argue with.
duenndruckpapier 3 years ago
For the amount of scientific journals and quotes by scientists I utilized in my arguments, you wouldn't think that you people would be so hard-headed.
EkoRenaissance 3 years ago
All mankind is of one species. Zoologically, human races are all mutually interfertile subspecies—i.e., breeding populations that differ in the relative frequencies of one or more genes. Although the variety of possible traits is practically limitless, random mating is not the case.
duenndruckpapier 3 years ago
Encyclopedia Britannica, 2004
duenndruckpapier 3 years ago
I assure you, biologists and anthropologists do as well. They have to. There needs to be some sort of term to describe the different groups/races/... Many Asians cannot digest milk (if not most, lacking the enzyme). Africans have a different brain shape and structure. The list is pretty long, but it's also pointless when you just won't accept the obvious.
duenndruckpapier 3 years ago
Druenwhateveriplayd&dtoomuch: actually, my position is 100% valid, and you cited no facts nor do you entertain the credibility to effectively refute it. Stastisticians, doctors, psychologists, and analysts use "pooulations" or "ethnicities". Anthropologists (those who study humanity) and biologists do not. Look it up.
I don't think I know anything. There's some things I do know and some things I don't, and I am blessed enough to be able to distinguish the two.
EkoRenaissance 3 years ago
You sure THINK you know a lot. Well, you're confusing biology and politics. You're in good company in doing this, plenty of liberals are doing so these days. Doesn't make it any more correct though.
duenndruckpapier 3 years ago
...not scientifically correct anyway, though perhaps "politically correct" - for whatever that's worth. Well - the "idiotic concept" as you call it always has been and still is accepted as a scientific fact. It was not borne of some sort of nationalism (or any of the other sources you mentioned). For the sake of "political correctness", scientists today prefer to speak of "populations", or "ethnic groups". It's just another term, not a different concept.
duenndruckpapier 3 years ago
Say about LEGAL equality, non-discrimination and politics what you like. But don't mix it up with biology. Two different fields, one's nothing to do with the other, and anyone in his right mind understands this and sees right through this. Next time round, arm yourself with a convincing case as opposed to a suit and glasses.
duenndruckpapier 3 years ago
Tragically, as eloquent as your delivery is, it's probably your advanced vocabulary that's preventing people from sticking with you throughout the message. At 6:33, I'm thinking that you and I are on the same page, but I'm going to keep watching.
Godheval 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
dont you have any thing better to do than say stupid shit nobody cares what you have to say other tha the nigger group naacp or al sharpcoon or jesse jackcoon.
1porter2 4 years ago
Curious.
This video here has almost 100 views.
The other one is nearing 2,000.
And, apparently, you're interested enough to log in, press "comment", type that entire illiterate waste of time, click on "post comment", wait for it to process, and watch it post.
Your behavior is pathetic, and I'm sure that your adolescence won't allow you to care for another five years.
EkoRenaissance 4 years ago
you brought this on your self with all three of your videos why cant you be your self and not say this stupid shit you bring on the race card issues
1porter2 4 years ago
You.
Are a moron.
EkoRenaissance 4 years ago
I think there are several terms he uses in this video that have more letters than your vocabulary has words. David and Goliath was a myth, mental midget. Perhaps you should steer clear, because this gentleman is out of your league.
Godheval 3 years ago
Great video!
latinoman32 4 years ago 2