I am just amazed you can't see a jumbo jet in the sky at all before it hits the building and only see the aftermath. Please tell me why it is so hard to see especially this camera view that is fixed right on it. Why the hell can't you see it?
I have never said that there was no planes or that the fire fighters where payed to lie but! i do have reason to believe that they can't tell us about things they seen and heard that day.
Here's the real deal for those interested.. be warned.. it doesn't make you any happier.. time to resolve your 10 year long conditioning.. >> watch?v=pZ6vgo11Sto
@ZEDSTODT The video below is John Gross (one of the lead NIST investigators) telling a physics teacher that he knows of no evidence of molten metal found in the WTC site in spite of all the evidence to the contrary. It is important to point that when John told this teacher to send him the NASA images showing temperatures reaching in excess of 2000 degrees, he later refused to give him his email address to send him the pictures.
@ZEDSTODT Here's why you're an idiot. There are ZERO experts who believe that 9/11 was inside job. Architects & Engineers for Truth 9/11 has no structural engineers. They use the theories concocted by Steven Jones (the same guy who believes that Jesus walked with the Mayans), and David Ray Griffin who's not even an expert in any field except conspiracy theory. Every Inside Job thory has been debunked years ago. Go back to your little cave and tin foil hat.
@godzilla1077 Oh Im going to believe some jerkoff calling himself godzilla here on boobtube!! Really! Really! All youve got are smears & bullshit. Go back to your soddomite bathhouse.
@ZEDSTODT Smears? Do the research you idiot. A&ETruth911 has no structural engineers. David Ray Griffen has no background in working with explosives or engineering. Richard Gage even admitted the event of 911 and the evidence present is "beyond thier scope of expertise" killing any credibility they have. You bought into their lies, hook line and sinker. You won't even dispute any of the theories.
@godzilla1077 What total bullshit that spews from your twisted maw. Bulding 7 didnt just collapse because of fire. Tehre were traces of thermate burning beneath the buildings for almost 3 months. Nicholas Rockefeller told Aaron Russo that there was going to be a Pearl Harbor type of event that would enable their cArtel to impose martial law on the US but you want me to believe your malignant snow-job bullshit?! All youve got are adhoms, lies & smears. Go jump into a burning volcano.
@ZEDSTODT Now you're going to use the Steven Jones theory of thermite? Guess what, ZERO thermite was ever found. The components he found are in every day things such as computers, paint, iron, drywall, air conditioning, and the likes. The 2 components that actually make up thermite was never found. A supporter of Jones named Niels Harrit inadvertenly killed the thermite theory as well. When asked how much thermite was needed he said 1000's of tons with huge explosions.
@godzillaDork Nobody "killed" the thermite observation. Thermate burned for more than two months underneath the towers. The evidence was deliberately concealed by the Feds in order to cover up the crime. Keep smearing all you want but I KNOW what really happened & you along with your twisted smear machine are TOTALLY FULL OF SHIT! In fact, Im glad you all are here because there is no better smoking gun than the murderers scrambling to conceal their bloody tracks with the usual weak adhoms. Freak
@ZEDSTODT I know the thought of science and physics tend to hurt your theory. I find it funny that you can't even dispute a single thing because chances are you don't even understand a thing that I'm posting. I'll give you a chance though, explain to me it was a lie. And don't give me one of those "oh, it's because I said so or the FEDs hid evidence." There is no smoking gun. There's a reason why Steven Jones won't subject his findings to peer review. He's lying.
@godzilla1077 You are lying, not Jones. You are the malignant disinformant trolling here to attack & deceive the curious. Even if you actually know anything about physics instead of just blathering out more pompous sewage you refuse to address the thermate burning for almost 3 months underneath the debris. Who the fuck are you really & what is your concern here? Of course i know some lying gangster such as you wont actually disclose that but I had to ask anyway.
@911TRUTHLIAR Black is white, love is hate, freedom is slavery. Dont try to tackle subjects that you dont comprehend. Your kindergarten class must be missing you right about now so run along.
anyone with even the slightest ability to discern bullshit knows these fire fighters are not authentic. This video is psy ops. File it under Governments attempt to defraud America.
@jazzfan5000 thanks for making my point. Most people have lost there ability to discern or read vibes.
Makes no difference to me. for, reality is holographic. What you believe is true, literally. If you believe you instantly synergize particles into vibration to cluster and form the images you see. So you can not be conscious of the tactics deployed in this and other media spins. They will be used to manipulate you. Not me. I wish you peace and love.
yea well...September clues has some damning evidence. Masks, markers, obvious video and audio manipulation. The second "plane" goes through the first wall, through the whole building and emerges outside completely intact. Even this video follows the same rule...video virtual manipulation, sell the lie with authority then switch to highly emotional rhetoric....then end it up with graphic and vivid descriptions of victims. This video is well done psy ops.
I'm a master metallurgist and have taught airframe in college for 20 years. That plane could not go through that building. hahahahahahahaha. Stop being stupid. The press was 100% guilty of murder. They were totally in on it. NO PLANE. That simple. NO Plane would melt into steel building. What about the floors of steel reinforced concrete. Did the carbon fiber, weaker than aluminum plow through 3 floors all the way across the building and out. hahaha. See the build aft. NO HOLE for plane
@911TRUTHINATOR even if a plane did go through it, do you honestly think that the nose could come out undeterred in its tilt, speed, and angle? i think not
@sssssjjjj1 "I'm a master metallurgist and have taught airframe in college for 20 years. That plane could not go through that building."
Cool, now here's your chance to show your expertise: How many Joules does a 350,000lb mass going 500mph carry, and what is the point load force limit for the columns impacted on the WTC? An expert like you shouldn't have any problem calculating the physics behind this. Please post your work here so everyone can see.
@sssssjjjj1 Really genius, I guess math was not one of your top subjects since you are only 26 years old.....another nut tard to add to the ignore list.
@sssssjjjj1 You're a master metallurgist and have taught airframe in college for 20 years? Wow! Impressive, especially when you list your age as 26 on your channel page. So then, you started teaching at age 6? You surely must have needed parental consent, no? But how on earth did you reach the lecture podium? Did you have to stand on a milk crate? So, what other "facts" do you have for us?
It is very rare that you see the "dislikes" outnumbering the "likes"...as-a-matter-of-fact, NEVER have I seen the likes outnumbered...so what does that tell you, TRUTHINATOR?
It tells me that most of the people who have viewed your video, know that it is bullshit, and you are a shill or incredibly STUPID!
The walls of your little world must feel like they are closing in---are you getting claustrophobic, yet? You should be...'cause it's just a matter of time before the truth triumphs!
The truthers ARE the rational people on the net, unlike the deep-in-denial debunkers who STILL believe everything their gov't tells them--and probably STILL believe everything their parents told them...about Santa, the Easter bunny, the tooth fairy, etc.
@Dave7689 "watch the stoplight move across the street to the left but
north tower moves to the right = FAKERY"
It's called 'zooming.' One day if you save up enough money from your Taco Bell night shift you might be able to buy a camera and try it yourself. I can't believe people are this dumb.
Anyone who believes 9/11 events as told by the media without an official investigation are the idiots...calling truthers names only exposes the ignorance of the sheeple!!! mud-slinging is typical when a debate can't be won with lies; change the subject, discredit the truth and those who seek it... I'd rather be a "conspiracy theorist" then a pathetic sheep waiting for the end but too stupid to know it's coming!!
And saying that no planers hold all the same theory is a lie. There are different views among us,. One thing is sure: that plane could never be a boeing commercial craft going at 550 mph. Boeings cannot reach that speed at sea level. Also the real explosion with fires happens well after the vehicle impacts And it is not possible for a boeing even conceding the alleged speed to cut steal beams all along its profile, like a cartoon. Plus the alleged hijacked flights were not in the BOT database
@fresniak "I believe the balls of fire were explosions from inside." How did explosions from the inside pull the exterior columns inward? Explosions don't pull things towards them?
"They knew it was mandatory to take control of the ms media"
How did they do that, and how did they plant CGI on videos of over 40 civilians? How did they fool eyewitnesses? Where did the plane parts come from that shot out of the building? How did they put pre-rendered planes on live news helicopter shots?
@nobraintheory you got some intelligent questions. About the walls there could be some beam which is pulled inside, especially in the first hit, because a military vehicle or kinda a winged missile was indeed used in the first impact. But if for example you look this video v=ZOIlloFt9cM (first one I found) or other ones, you will see that the majority of beams are not inwards.
@fresniak "the majority of beams are not inwards. "
Wrong. Try looking at higher res pics, not video captures from youtube. Google WTC impact hole. The beams are bent inwards, because something hit them.
"but am sure there is lot of techniques"
So you're saying that you're completely guessing here?
"I guess with many computers etc"
Oh, they used COMPUTERS? Then anything is possible... You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, it's basically just a bunch of stupid guesses.
@nobraintheory why dont you point me to some picture where the beam are inward? I have done my job, so you do yours. In the video I linked the quality of the picture is enough good and my current profession has to do with digital imaging and computer programming..so I am qualified to know how good is the quality of an image.
@nobraintheory I remember about you, you were shilling around the same video 1 year ago. I guess beside teaching at university you must have a lot of time for your CIA shill work.
@nobraintheory "So you're saying that you're completely guessing here?" no I am not really guessing, if you position the explosives the right way you can make a hole to look the way you want. You have also several options such as pre-cutting steel and so on..I was just being honest saying that I have never worked in explosives, but everyone with a brain knows that you can achieve that with the right techniques. Also you have not even proven your initial assumption about the beams
@fresniak "You have also several options such as pre-cutting steel"
Yet no one in the WTC reported this in the preceding months.
"initial assumption about the beams"
Not an assumption, fact. It would take less time to look at the pictures than keep arguing. Check them out, the beams are bent in. You can also clearly see the wing marks, and there is no evidence of explosions.
@nobraintheory I have looked at the beams they are not bent in most of them are straight and once again I told that a small plane (winged missile) was indeed used to pierce the first tower. So yes you may expect those beams that were hit by the missile to be bent in. But not all the rest. If the pictures are so clear why not to post your link to prove it? AFRAID? SCARED?
@nobraintheory it was reported - heavy works were reported to be happening in the weeks before 911, allegedly to change the electricity system or something like that. MArvin Bush was even in the directive office of the securacom of wtc YOU LIAR
@nobraintheory the hole was enlarged by the explosion. You seem to have difficulty in understanding the points of the opposing theory, or it's just convenient to keep ignoring them
The missile was a winged missile but the whole hole was created by the explosion, the Naudet video shows that the so called "wing hole" is created by secondary explosions and probably thermite.
@fresniak - Make sure you don't mention being wrong about Marvin Bush, JASSMs, etc.
"looked at the picture by googling"
yay! Great job, it only took 2 days.
"There are even bent out columns."
There was an explosion.
"failed to show any evidence of what you claim"
10,000 witnesses, 43 amateur videos, 4 live news videos, hundreds of high res pictures, radar data, family members, firefighters, police, that all back me up. You've got nothing but September Clues.
@nobraintheory "Make sure you don't mention being wrong about Marvin Bush, JASSMs, etc." ONCE AGAIN YOU AVOID ANSWERING THE QUESTION Please JUST DIE and make the world a better place to live in
@fresniak - Talking to you is like playing retard whack-a-mole. You say something stupid, I disprove it, then you never mention it again and go on to something else.
@nobraintheory "Talking to you is like playing retard whack-a-mole. You say something stupid, I disprove it, then you never mention it again and go on to something else." that's what you do actually. You didnt prove anything. The columns are mostly not bent in, you prefer concentration on marvin bush cause it was so marginal.
@nobraintheory "10,000 witnesses, 43 amateur videos, 4 live news videos, hundreds of high res pictures, radar data, family members, firefighters, police, that all back me up. You've got nothing but September Clues."
They dont back you up. YOU CLAIM they do, but they don't. YOU LIAR AND SHILL
Yes, they do. There is undeniably video, pictures, radar data, witness reports and passengers of the planes. Just saying there isn't doesn't make it go away.
@nobraintheory "You should go into one of the fire stations .." I NEVER SAID that any of the firefighters were liars. Rather the opposite, NY firefighters witnessed and described the destruction of the wtc as a controlled demolition: v=SXD3bAbZCow
In this video it is possible the firefighters were in good faith, but the naudet knew perfectly what was going on. btw this video was altered later on. check the difference between frame 0:57 and frame 1:30
@fresniak "but the naudet knew perfectly what was going on"
Is that why the impact is out of focus? They were focused on the foreground. Why?
It seems to me you're suggesting this video is fake. What about it? How could the video be fake and the firefighters not in on it. For god sakes, the video is about the twoof movement saying the firefighters are lying. Be specific. You've got to have some theory or you wouldn't be here.
@nobraintheory Look any people with a brain watching the first seconds of this video understands that the cameraman knew perfectly where to point its lens. "How could the video be fake and the firefighters not in on it." You have really no imagination, the firefighters boss arranged that meeting with the naudet, the guys there could as well be completely unaware of the real reason of the meeting.
@fresniak "Look any people with a brain watching the first seconds of this video understands that the cameraman knew perfectly where to point its lens."
Just not where to focus it? Seems to me it's obvious that he heard the noise like everyone else in the video, and looked towards the source. Of course to you that's impossible, and in order to point his camera where everyone is looking he had to be part of the biggest conspiracy of all time. Dipshit twoofer logic at it's finest.
@nobraintheory I am sayign the video was really shot by the naudets, who knew in advance they would have been capturing the first wtc impact. Some parts of the videos were clearly edited later on, once again compare frame 0:57 and frame 1:30, do not ignore what I write as usual for your convenience.
nobraintheory you are a shill and I feel no wish or need to further talk to you. I had already sent you there to hang yourself.
What about them? Just say what you're thinking, no need for games.
"do not ignore what I write as usual for your convenience."
Dude, I ignore most of what you say because you're a whiny bitch. I don't work for you, I'll do what I want. If you noticed something about the frames then say it or shut the fuck up.
"you are a shill and I feel no wish or need to further talk to you."
@nobraintheory I have looked at the picture by googling and I found there are no bent in columns except those of the missile impact. There are even bent out columns. The majority of beams seems like they were pre-cut and then made to explode. You're the fucking retard who has failed to show any evidence of what you claim
@nobraintheory "Nope, he left in 2000. WRONG AGAIN! " so I am wrong by one year wow. Please report also the month? Beside that, is it just a coincidence? And you of course did not address the following cause it is convenient:"it was reported - heavy works were reported to be happening in the weeks before 911, allegedly to change the electricity system or something like that."
Yep. An important year, though, that means he wasn't in charge of security on 9/11.
"it was reported - heavy works were reported to be happening in the weeks before 911"
How does that support the no plane theory. Big buildings are under constant maintenance, and the electrical system has nothing to do with putting invisible explosives on the outside of the building in a plane hole shape, or inventing a hologram to fool the live witnesses.
@nobraintheory I have no time to loos with shills. You forgot to reply to why you are on these videos all the time. You forgot to mention your little dirty work for cia. Now go fuck yourself and just hang yourself
@nobraintheory From your typical shill behavior I have come to the EASY Conclusion that you are a TRAITOR who deserve to die and perish of long extremely acute pain and hillness
@fresniak - And from your retarded theories and piss poor writing skills I've come to the conclusion that you're a 12 year old in your mom's basement. If you're threatening to kill me then bring it on you little pussy. Bitches like you are only tough behind anonymous internet forums. In the real world, you're a meek little child.
@nobraintheory "You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, it's basically just a bunch of stupid guesses." I am an experienced computer programmer, what are you instead? A paid shill or what?
@nobraintheory Also they have not preplanted explosives randomly but very precisely in order to simulate the impact. I am not into explosives but am sure there is lot of techniques available to simulate some kind of damage you want.
@nobraintheory They took control of media. If you research it there is some kind of emergency law in US which allows the military to take control of the media. They did it with the media complicity but they could have done it by force as well. I do not know it exactly, all what appears clear they have fed the same images from the same cameras to every single major media, using some kind of directing studio, I guess with many computers etc... the all thing was planned and tested before for sure
@nobraintheory About the 40 so called amateur videos. First of all you forgot the main point. The media are telling their fake story of the events, now you have a truly amateur video showing that the facts went completely in a different way there are 2 possibilities. 1) You hand it to the very same media (even for money) 2) you become scared that what you recorded does not match the media lies at all and you decide to keep it for yourself (eventually u'd become a threatened eye-witness)
@nobraintheory So you can guess that the amateur videos that were submitted to the media were manipulated with computer graphics and they had months to do it. The first amateur videos came out after some month. Except one (I think the one with the black plane) which most surely was not amateur at all. Also are you aware that many of the so called amateur videos are credited to video professional or other media related people? See the Fairbank case (it's a total scam)
@fresniak "So you can guess that the amateur videos that were submitted to the media were manipulated with computer graphics"
No. People shot planes, then sent in the footage. That's fact. How come zero people came forward and said "there wasn't a plane in my footage when I sent it in!"
"The first amateur videos came out after some month."
@nobraintheory "People shot planes," YOUR ASSUMPTION - "How come zero people came forward and said.there wasn't a plane in my footage when I sent it in." hmmm let's see maybe they were worried of seeing themselves hanging from the ceiling of their room next day by a simulated suicide?
You didn't even bother to research the stories behind all these videos, you'll find many also signed agreements with the media about usage claims.
@fresniak "you'll find many also signed agreements with the media about usage claims."
It's called a release form, that's how news video works dude.
""People shot planes," YOUR ASSUMPTION"
It's NOT AN ASSUMPTION, people did shoot planes. Are you being purposely dense? Real people, like Jennifer Spell and Hezarkhani shot video of planes. They sent the tapes in. It's a fact.
"You didn't even bother to research the stories behind all these videos"
@nobraintheory "hat's a lie. Not true at all." what is the truth then, when did the amateur videos come out? All of them came out after many days or months. I am sorry but I have researched this long ago, I just cant remember exactly how many days or months it was. If you know then tell it, so everyone can enjoy your knowledge
@nobraintheory they didn't fool eyewitnesses. Media did everything to ignore them and their reports whch only speak about explosions and many reported explosions in the basement and so on..the media just reported THEIR "eyewitnesses" all people that were working for the media, and still some of them (that was probably not involved) reported elements of the truth that were promptly silenced by the anchorman in studio.remember the media were complicit, they couldnt have done it without them.
Correct, because everyone saw a plane. You can't tell me that tens of thousands of New Yorkers all hallucinated a plane. I know people who were there, do you? Have you ever talked to a witness?
"remember the media were complicit"
"The media" is made up of thousands of people, producers, editors, camera ops, anchors, grips, lighting, etc. How many people do you think were involved?
@nobraintheory Also look into it. There are a lot of suicides related to 911. People probably who was first threatened and then killed. You cant close your eyes on these things. These are facts. People is threatened and killed, it's a mafia. They have the secret services doing their dirty job for them.
@nobraintheory "Where did the plane parts come from that shot out of the building" which plane parts are you talking about and which footage? I' ve seen low quality nose-out video from fox and it is absurd to think a plane can penetrate the wtc steel frame building 2 times and have its nose intact) That was CG mistake. They had to do it live that's why went slightly wrong. It's easy to put CG on a video when you know what the zoom will be. it looks like they had a 4 seconds time delay to do it.
Uh, no. That's an engine. Watch the whole clip, you can see it fall to the street. People saw it hit, and it was found.
"That was CG mistake."
I teach CGI at a university and own a media company. What you're saying doesn't make sense. It would be an extra step to add a 'nose out.' It couldn't happen by mistake, and it's in all the videos so it makes even less sense.
I'm not convinced of the tv fakery theory but I am convinced that the towers could in no way fall the way they did simply from fires burning at the top floors. You can see the buildings falling from below the impact points. You can see explosions 30 stories below the falling floors.I was skeptical like every other American..something is wrong and we need to re-open an investigation on what really happened. Why would these firemen lie? What happened in the lobby? Explosions were heard b4 the hit.
@MOOSALINY and people wonder how conspiracy theories are created? At least you admitted you finally saw a plane or "a little something" hit the tower. The only problem is that for every person, like you, who doesn't see the plane but after a while sees it, there's twenty people who doesn't see the plane, then stop watching and goes out claiming it was a hoax.
@Espmell YEAH I DID FINALLY SEE IT. I DONT LIKE TO JUST ASSUME THINGS WITHOUT BEING DEFINITELY SURE. I WROTE THE FIRST COMMENT WITHOUT DOUBLE CHECKING.
@MOOSALINY well, for me it's quite amazing you didn't see it in the first place. Do you have a 2 inch monitor?
Since you both have the balls to admit you were wrong AND answer my comment I'll ask you another one; Are you one of those believing no planes hit the WTC or do you both agree it was a plane in this video AND the video is real? I'm going to bed so don't expect a reply until tomorrow ;)
@Espmell WELL I ALWAYS BELIEVED PLANES HIT THE BUILDINGS. I ONLY POSTED THE COMMENT BECAUSE I WAS CONFUSED ABOUT WHERE THE PLANE WAS. IM NOT ONE OF THE WTC THEORIST. TO BE HONEST I DONT KNOW WHO IS BEHIND WHAT HAPPENED. I DONT TRUST ANYONE BUT JESUS. THATS ALL I KNOW TO DO. IM JUST AN ONLOOKER NOT A DEBATOR.
WHEN THE FIREFIGHTER LOOKED UP HE LOOKED UP IN THE DIRECTION THAT WOULD INSIST THAT WHEN THE CAMERA TURNED AROUND AND UPWARD WE WOULD SEE A PLANE FLY INTO THE BUILDING. WHERE THE HELL IS THE PLANE THAT TEH FIREFIGHTER WAS LOOKING AT. I SURE DIDNT SEE IT. IF IT HIT ON THE OTHER SIDE THEN HE SHOUDL HAVE BEEN LOOKING UPWARD TOWARDS HIS LEFT AND THE PLANE WOULD HAVE CIRCLED A LITTLE BIT AND HIT ON THE OTHER SIDE BUT EVEN THEN WE WOULD HAVE SEEN IT FLY AROUND THE BUILDING SOME.
inside JOB PERIOD YOU PEOPLE REALLY NEED JOBS OR A DATE.
MY BROTHER WAS MURDERED ON THIS DAY, AND THIS GOV HAD BOTH HANDS IN THE PLOT. sO PLEASE TAKE YOUR GOV SHOW SOME PLACE ELSE,TRY FOX THEY LIKE PEOPLE LIKE YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@themomentofclarity ahh, you stupid fuck. desperately holding on to whatever tiny straw you can find. These videos are being analysed beyond any logic! You "no plane" guys are starting to piss me off. You don't have the brains to understand the extend of what you're indicating!
@Espmell WOW big words dude. Explain to me why the video shooter framed up the tip of the tower before it hit asshole, ever heard of an orgy of evidence? the camera man was PREPPED, no argument.
@themomentofclarity I would have liked to discuss with you but I'm giving up. I've spent a lot of days trying to ask a simple question to you guys; How many people would be involved if the no plane theory is right. Not a single one of you are able to answer it. It seems like none of you is willing to spend a second of thought into that question. So as long as I don't get a single answer to my question, I'm done discussion on youtube! Merry Christmas!
@Espmell If u'd ask the questions correctly and with open mind you would probably get more answers. First of all conspiracy deniers often think in terms of "how many people should be involved" or "the gvt would never do this" etc..instead you should first focus on evidences. Second this operation was studied for years by the perps. Do you think they didn't expect people to come out and speak the truth? They knew it was mandatory to take control of the ms media, and that's what happened on 911
Naudit Brothers: How big is the chance to make a documentary in NY on 9/11? Let's say 1/1000. Firedepartement? 1/50. Not inside or on the road 1/2. cameraman on the right side of the road 1/4 camera not on tripod 1/2 camera running 1/3 wtc not blocked by passengers or buildings 1/5 have all the same luck on the second hit? you be the judge!
It is truely pathetic that you have to make these men out to be liars when they had to witness something that horrible. This is a disrespect to all of the people who passed away that day and their families. These guys are braver than you could ever hope to be. They have been through enough so they do not need you to put them down and call them liars. They were rushed and trying to save lives. Of course they are not going to remember every little thing the same way. Get a life.
don't you think this was just fucking horrifying? don't you think calling it a cover up is a little disrepctfull to the families of the dead...the same dead americans that had to witness fellow crew members nearly decapitated with utility knives, then flown wildly into a building? what about flight 93...do you thnk they deserve truther lies?you nerds have nothing better to do than be paranoid losers sitting in your mommys basements at computers u used to play wow and jerk off to making up lies?
I don't get it. Why are you saying the firefighters are liars? They are telling their stories as far as I understand. The part about the bodies falling is so sad. I don't get why you're posting a video and branding them liars. They did the best they could.
EVERYONE claiming no planes against WTC 1 and 2 is a misinformationist working for Coverup squads trying to make the real Truth Movement look bad by association. The best anyone can say is that perhaps it was not flight 175 that hit tower 2 based on the under belly analysis of the plane...but it was still some sort of plane just ask Stanley Prainmanth about the wing sticking out of his office upon impact
As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country’s history.
The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft.
@mfriedlin Are you serious? Look at the photos of wreckage at the Pentagon and the Shanksville crashsite. Hell, there's even debris from the planes that hit the WTC that have been photographed. "Not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced?" Are you serious? What are you suggesting then? Are you saying that the four aircraft just magically disappeared?
Oh yea, so now the FDNY is in on the conspiracy... Whats next? The NYPD? Or maybe the old lady living down the street? Come on, be serious. You "Truthers" are looking like "LOSERS"...
I can't believe people NOT behind this, are STILL debating it.
I came from the "other side", but Now, the evidence is so overwhelming, that even if 8/10ths of it were false, the Truth would Still be Obvious beyond comprehension.
ANYONE, with; 1) A mind that remains true & honest to themselves,
& 2) 10 seconds to watch the purposely demolished buildings free fall, KNOWS the Truth.
It is an engineering fact, that the ONLY way to drop those building w/o toppling into other one's, is Demolition(.)
The Media Response to 9/11 dealt with the New Statesman's grudging recognition of Dr. David Ray Griffin, the world's "top truther" (as it dubbed him), placing him number 41 among "The 50 People Who Matter Today."1 Since this admission in September 2009, the issue has gathered increasing momentum
Although the new scientific evidence against the official story of 9/11 was not reported in the mainstream British or North American media, it did receive attention in continental Europe.
The airplane was UA175, a Boeing 767-200, shortly before crashing into World Trade Center Tower 2. Based on analysis of radar data, the National Transportation and Safety Board reported the groundspeed just before impact as 510 knots. This is well beyond the maximum operating velocity of 360 knots, and maximum dive velocity of 410 the 767 flew well beyond its flight envelope, was controllable, and managed to hit a relatively small target.
Israel's secret and super-secure nuclear lab is where the extremely powerful super-thermite of 9-11 was designed. The chief scientists involved in the manufacturing of the nano-composite used to pulverize the World Trade Center on 9-11
In any case, it is important for those seeking the truth about 9/11 to consider what organizations and people had access to the technologies that were used to accomplish the deceptive demolition of the WTC buildings. It is also important to recognize the links between those who had access to the technologies, those who had access to the buildings, and those who produced the clearly false official reports
you truthers are an insult to america and the people who died trying to save others. you only look at evidence that helps you and igonre actual facts. Not to mention at this point you are so convinced it was an inside job you would never admit you are wrong out of pride and the fact you wasted the last 9 years believing in something thats bullshit.
Is this the best script handed out to you? Evidence that helps ignore actual facts? Like what? So convinced?? If we as Americans are "convinced" it was an inside job, no one would be searching any further...idiot. Yes, 9 years. Incredible isn't it? 9 long years...and although a lot of evidence has been destroyed by all of those involved, still common people, professionals, educated in the field have come forward exposing lie after lie. Common sense is fantastic.
You know when you make insulting remarks it gives your intentions dead away.
Hard for me to believe there are any people who can actually type who couild believe the official fairytale about 9/11. Leads me to believe either there are some people who are just stuck in a false paradigm or they're actually paid to post nonsense. Check ae911truth(dot)org the REAL SCIENCE says inside job.
Just look at the imposed comments on this video....all desperate comments to pull people off thinking there was actually something very wrong going on with the fairytale and then uses the NYC firefighter role as a backdoor to dis-inform. Deviate the masses into controlled thought. What about the first responders who are being denied proper health care and let to rot. Why do you think that is happening. Kill silently those who know and saw? Clever.
Yes, the family members. Always use the family members to set loose the emotional factor and condem all who question.
Listen Jimmy, it's time that child molestors such as you get a life. You know this is all bullshit. Don't talk suffering to me. I am related to a family member and EACH AND EVERY ONE of those that have been involved in this tragedy are looking for answers outside the fairytale. Insult to America? What an asshole you are.
@LVEbonys they are looking for answers and they got them, keep them upset with your lies, good for you what a friend. im sure they apprecite it when you try and convince them their own govt did it with random so called facts. You guys want it to be an inside job, now why is that?
"they are looking for answers and they got them"....? From who? YouTube videos and fantasy explanations from the media? It must be a difficult assignment you have, not having a conscience having to troll and lie to fellow Americans. It pays the bills I guess plus PX access for beer, can't beat that can you.
@911TRUTHINATOR Are the 1,200 professional architects and engineers of ae911truth(dot)org LIARS ? They have the scientific peer reviewed and approved forensics that determined WTC buildings 1, 2 and 7 were professionally demolished. I'd say these engineers have gone to a lot of time, expense and trouble because they know this was a mass murder. Could you round up 1,200 professionals who would stake their careers and possible jailtime on lies ?
I am kind of glad I was the 88th person to vote on this video making it 44 for and 44 against. Cause that's basically where I am these days, right in the goddamn middle yet again. I was convinced at one point that it was a vast conspiracy and as old habits die hard I still have my suspicions, but I can't cling to them as factual anymore. It wasn't this video that did it, its the amount of people that are basing everything on just gut feelings. Emotional conclusions are very dangerous.
911toofinator do you expect people to believe that cave dwelling, boxcutter wielding, turban wearing, sand loving highjackers highjacked highjacked-planes keeping their balance on speeding hijacked-planes and flew three planes with military precision?
since you are an expert in highjacking, terrorism, and boxcutter wielding i guess it would make sense to troll on youtube.
you are better off proving god exists than proving 9/11 WASNT an inside job.
I am just amazed you can't see a jumbo jet in the sky at all before it hits the building and only see the aftermath. Please tell me why it is so hard to see especially this camera view that is fixed right on it. Why the hell can't you see it?
cjr1881 1 month ago
I have never said that there was no planes or that the fire fighters where payed to lie but! i do have reason to believe that they can't tell us about things they seen and heard that day.
SUNNYRAINWIND 2 months ago
Here's the real deal for those interested.. be warned.. it doesn't make you any happier.. time to resolve your 10 year long conditioning.. >> watch?v=pZ6vgo11Sto
earthbeautiful 4 months ago
Guilt by association tactic here.
StratusBlue 8 months ago
@ZEDSTODT The video below is John Gross (one of the lead NIST investigators) telling a physics teacher that he knows of no evidence of molten metal found in the WTC site in spite of all the evidence to the contrary. It is important to point that when John told this teacher to send him the NASA images showing temperatures reaching in excess of 2000 degrees, he later refused to give him his email address to send him the pictures.
/watch?v=wcqf5tL887o&feature=player_embedded
tubeshok 9 months ago
Mossad Caught in Van on 9-11 "Filled with Explosives" GW Bridge
/watch?v=FXddYoeeuOA
tubeshok 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mossad--not Muslims--did 9/11. 9/11 Truth from Director of US ARMY War College /watch?v=gZci_o8nzQs
tubeshok 9 months ago
Comment removed
ZEDSTODT 10 months ago
Comment removed
ZEDSTODT 10 months ago
Comment removed
ZEDSTODT 10 months ago
911=Inside job. I cant wait to see the true perpetrators squirm when theyre finally apprehended.
ZEDSTODT 10 months ago
@ZEDSTODT Here's why you're an idiot. There are ZERO experts who believe that 9/11 was inside job. Architects & Engineers for Truth 9/11 has no structural engineers. They use the theories concocted by Steven Jones (the same guy who believes that Jesus walked with the Mayans), and David Ray Griffin who's not even an expert in any field except conspiracy theory. Every Inside Job thory has been debunked years ago. Go back to your little cave and tin foil hat.
godzilla1077 10 months ago
@godzilla1077 Oh Im going to believe some jerkoff calling himself godzilla here on boobtube!! Really! Really! All youve got are smears & bullshit. Go back to your soddomite bathhouse.
ZEDSTODT 10 months ago
@ZEDSTODT Smears? Do the research you idiot. A&ETruth911 has no structural engineers. David Ray Griffen has no background in working with explosives or engineering. Richard Gage even admitted the event of 911 and the evidence present is "beyond thier scope of expertise" killing any credibility they have. You bought into their lies, hook line and sinker. You won't even dispute any of the theories.
godzilla1077 10 months ago
@godzilla1077 What total bullshit that spews from your twisted maw. Bulding 7 didnt just collapse because of fire. Tehre were traces of thermate burning beneath the buildings for almost 3 months. Nicholas Rockefeller told Aaron Russo that there was going to be a Pearl Harbor type of event that would enable their cArtel to impose martial law on the US but you want me to believe your malignant snow-job bullshit?! All youve got are adhoms, lies & smears. Go jump into a burning volcano.
ZEDSTODT 10 months ago
@ZEDSTODT Now you're going to use the Steven Jones theory of thermite? Guess what, ZERO thermite was ever found. The components he found are in every day things such as computers, paint, iron, drywall, air conditioning, and the likes. The 2 components that actually make up thermite was never found. A supporter of Jones named Niels Harrit inadvertenly killed the thermite theory as well. When asked how much thermite was needed he said 1000's of tons with huge explosions.
godzilla1077 10 months ago
@godzillaDork Nobody "killed" the thermite observation. Thermate burned for more than two months underneath the towers. The evidence was deliberately concealed by the Feds in order to cover up the crime. Keep smearing all you want but I KNOW what really happened & you along with your twisted smear machine are TOTALLY FULL OF SHIT! In fact, Im glad you all are here because there is no better smoking gun than the murderers scrambling to conceal their bloody tracks with the usual weak adhoms. Freak
ZEDSTODT 10 months ago
@ZEDSTODT I know the thought of science and physics tend to hurt your theory. I find it funny that you can't even dispute a single thing because chances are you don't even understand a thing that I'm posting. I'll give you a chance though, explain to me it was a lie. And don't give me one of those "oh, it's because I said so or the FEDs hid evidence." There is no smoking gun. There's a reason why Steven Jones won't subject his findings to peer review. He's lying.
godzilla1077 10 months ago
@godzilla1077 You are lying, not Jones. You are the malignant disinformant trolling here to attack & deceive the curious. Even if you actually know anything about physics instead of just blathering out more pompous sewage you refuse to address the thermate burning for almost 3 months underneath the debris. Who the fuck are you really & what is your concern here? Of course i know some lying gangster such as you wont actually disclose that but I had to ask anyway.
ZEDSTODT 10 months ago
@ZEDSTODT "thermate burning for almost 3 months underneath the debris" LMAO!!
YOU ARE TOO STUPID TO SEE HOW STUPID YOU REALLY ARE!
LMAO!!!
911TRUTHINATOR 10 months ago
@911TRUTHLIAR Black is white, love is hate, freedom is slavery. Dont try to tackle subjects that you dont comprehend. Your kindergarten class must be missing you right about now so run along.
ZEDSTODT 10 months ago
@ZEDSTODT
"I cant wait to see the true perpetrators squirm when theyre finally apprehended"
why wait? why don't you go to ex-president GEORGE W BUSH'S ranch in texas and perform a citizens arrest on him.
911TRUTHINATOR 10 months ago 3
@911TRUTHLIAR Bush was only the stooge. God is going to apprehend you & your bloody crew for your heinous crimes against His Creation.
ZEDSTODT 10 months ago
@911TRUTHINATOR Because he'll get butt fucked by secret service. Twoofers can only talk shit on the internet lol
H1TMANactual 1 month ago
" I knew it was no accident" Lying sack of shit.
timrocket2008 10 months ago
@timrocket2008 I thought you didn't support the "no plane" theory?
jazzfan5000 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jazzfan5000 So now you think I do? Why?
timrocket2008 10 months ago
it was a big grey plane
=A0aWe_AStnw&feature=channel_video_title
voodoowichdoctor 10 months ago
anyone with even the slightest ability to discern bullshit knows these fire fighters are not authentic. This video is psy ops. File it under Governments attempt to defraud America.
MattIndigoWilliams 11 months ago
@MattIndigoWilliams Dude, you realize this is the 21st century? Not the 12th century? Witch hunts are a thing of the distant past!
jazzfan5000 10 months ago
@jazzfan5000 thanks for making my point. Most people have lost there ability to discern or read vibes.
Makes no difference to me. for, reality is holographic. What you believe is true, literally. If you believe you instantly synergize particles into vibration to cluster and form the images you see. So you can not be conscious of the tactics deployed in this and other media spins. They will be used to manipulate you. Not me. I wish you peace and love.
MattIndigoWilliams 10 months ago
@MattIndigoWilliams In other words, you live in a fantasy. Good luck with that!
jazzfan5000 10 months ago
@jazzfan5000 Yes, I live in a fantastic beautiful heaven.
Luck implies that there is good and bad in this heaven.
There is only good. Nothing happens that isn't linked
to my own desire and intention.
A warrior never leaves anything to chance.
In this, offering him luck is like offering water to the ocean.
Blessings...:)
MattIndigoWilliams 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ZEDSTODT 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ZEDSTODT 10 months ago
@MattIndigoWilliams But how can you tell that they are not authentic firefighters? I mean, exactly what is it, that is the tip off? Thanks.
azul8811 8 months ago
yea well...September clues has some damning evidence. Masks, markers, obvious video and audio manipulation. The second "plane" goes through the first wall, through the whole building and emerges outside completely intact. Even this video follows the same rule...video virtual manipulation, sell the lie with authority then switch to highly emotional rhetoric....then end it up with graphic and vivid descriptions of victims. This video is well done psy ops.
turquoisegiants 11 months ago
I'm a master metallurgist and have taught airframe in college for 20 years. That plane could not go through that building. hahahahahahahaha. Stop being stupid. The press was 100% guilty of murder. They were totally in on it. NO PLANE. That simple. NO Plane would melt into steel building. What about the floors of steel reinforced concrete. Did the carbon fiber, weaker than aluminum plow through 3 floors all the way across the building and out. hahaha. See the build aft. NO HOLE for plane
sssssjjjj1 1 year ago
@sssssjjjj1 " That plane could not go through that building. hahahahahahahaha"
stupid twoofers who think they are smart are the funniest
how the planes entered the towers"
watch?v=PhKrirlTw8c!
stick that in your pipe and smoke it loser!.
OWNED!!! ROFLMAO!!!
911TRUTHINATOR 1 year ago
@911TRUTHINATOR Building 7....free fall speed, Im curious can you answer that.....because nobody else can?
1THETRUTH10 9 months ago
@911TRUTHINATOR even if a plane did go through it, do you honestly think that the nose could come out undeterred in its tilt, speed, and angle? i think not
Ir0nF1st924 7 months ago
@sssssjjjj1 "I'm a master metallurgist and have taught airframe in college for 20 years. That plane could not go through that building."
Cool, now here's your chance to show your expertise: How many Joules does a 350,000lb mass going 500mph carry, and what is the point load force limit for the columns impacted on the WTC? An expert like you shouldn't have any problem calculating the physics behind this. Please post your work here so everyone can see.
Here's where you make up an excuse...
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory your name suits you well.
turquoisegiants 11 months ago
@sssssjjjj1
Really? Do you realize most military missiles have thinner aluminum shells than the standard 767?
phlyegles43 11 months ago
@sssssjjjj1 Really genius, I guess math was not one of your top subjects since you are only 26 years old.....another nut tard to add to the ignore list.
rhonieme 11 months ago
@sssssjjjj1 Well I guess you better go back to school for metallury because apparently you don't know much about it!
jazzfan5000 10 months ago
Comment removed
ZEDSTODT 10 months ago
@sssssjjjj1 You're a master metallurgist and have taught airframe in college for 20 years? Wow! Impressive, especially when you list your age as 26 on your channel page. So then, you started teaching at age 6? You surely must have needed parental consent, no? But how on earth did you reach the lecture podium? Did you have to stand on a milk crate? So, what other "facts" do you have for us?
azul8811 8 months ago
@sssssjjj u were a teacher? no wonder our kids are learning nothing at school and the quality of education is going down the toilet
JamesIsViolet 2 months ago
Bombs were going off in the basements before the planes hit, thats why it looked like a bomb went off in the lobby.
campbell4show 1 year ago
It is very rare that you see the "dislikes" outnumbering the "likes"...as-a-matter-of-fact, NEVER have I seen the likes outnumbered...so what does that tell you, TRUTHINATOR?
It tells me that most of the people who have viewed your video, know that it is bullshit, and you are a shill or incredibly STUPID!
The walls of your little world must feel like they are closing in---are you getting claustrophobic, yet? You should be...'cause it's just a matter of time before the truth triumphs!
WHATAGOOF!
Bongofury361 1 year ago
@Bongofury361 It tells that there are more truthers on the net than rational people.
DrinkingWithTim 1 year ago
@DrinkingWithTim
The truthers ARE the rational people on the net, unlike the deep-in-denial debunkers who STILL believe everything their gov't tells them--and probably STILL believe everything their parents told them...about Santa, the Easter bunny, the tooth fairy, etc.
WAKE-THE-FUCK-UP!
Bongofury361 1 year ago
0:35 watch the stoplight move across the street to the left but
north tower moves to the right = FAKERY
Dave7689 1 year ago
@Dave7689 "watch the stoplight move across the street to the left but
north tower moves to the right = FAKERY"
It's called 'zooming.' One day if you save up enough money from your Taco Bell night shift you might be able to buy a camera and try it yourself. I can't believe people are this dumb.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
Anyone who believes 9/11 events as told by the media without an official investigation are the idiots...calling truthers names only exposes the ignorance of the sheeple!!! mud-slinging is typical when a debate can't be won with lies; change the subject, discredit the truth and those who seek it... I'd rather be a "conspiracy theorist" then a pathetic sheep waiting for the end but too stupid to know it's coming!!
threepercenter03 1 year ago
And saying that no planers hold all the same theory is a lie. There are different views among us,. One thing is sure: that plane could never be a boeing commercial craft going at 550 mph. Boeings cannot reach that speed at sea level. Also the real explosion with fires happens well after the vehicle impacts And it is not possible for a boeing even conceding the alleged speed to cut steal beams all along its profile, like a cartoon. Plus the alleged hijacked flights were not in the BOT database
fresniak 1 year ago
that was not a boeing, it was a small military plane, and the explosives were planted.
fresniak 1 year ago
@fresniak "I believe the balls of fire were explosions from inside." How did explosions from the inside pull the exterior columns inward? Explosions don't pull things towards them?
"They knew it was mandatory to take control of the ms media"
How did they do that, and how did they plant CGI on videos of over 40 civilians? How did they fool eyewitnesses? Where did the plane parts come from that shot out of the building? How did they put pre-rendered planes on live news helicopter shots?
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory you got some intelligent questions. About the walls there could be some beam which is pulled inside, especially in the first hit, because a military vehicle or kinda a winged missile was indeed used in the first impact. But if for example you look this video v=ZOIlloFt9cM (first one I found) or other ones, you will see that the majority of beams are not inwards.
fresniak 1 year ago
@fresniak "the majority of beams are not inwards. "
Wrong. Try looking at higher res pics, not video captures from youtube. Google WTC impact hole. The beams are bent inwards, because something hit them.
"but am sure there is lot of techniques"
So you're saying that you're completely guessing here?
"I guess with many computers etc"
Oh, they used COMPUTERS? Then anything is possible... You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, it's basically just a bunch of stupid guesses.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory why dont you point me to some picture where the beam are inward? I have done my job, so you do yours. In the video I linked the quality of the picture is enough good and my current profession has to do with digital imaging and computer programming..so I am qualified to know how good is the quality of an image.
fresniak 1 year ago
@fresniak "so you do yours"
It's not my job to google things for you, and you can't post links here. Just google WTC impact hole, every single picture shows it.
"In the video I linked the quality of the picture is enough good"
So you think there's no quality difference between a video frame at 320x240 and a hi rez photograph? You must suck at your job.
"what are you instead?"
Already told you, I teach video production at a university and own a media company. Read harder.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory man you're such a shill. I have posted a link here - it's easy just divide it into parts you don't need to be einstein to do that.
fresniak 1 year ago
@nobraintheory I remember about you, you were shilling around the same video 1 year ago. I guess beside teaching at university you must have a lot of time for your CIA shill work.
fresniak 1 year ago
@nobraintheory "So you're saying that you're completely guessing here?" no I am not really guessing, if you position the explosives the right way you can make a hole to look the way you want. You have also several options such as pre-cutting steel and so on..I was just being honest saying that I have never worked in explosives, but everyone with a brain knows that you can achieve that with the right techniques. Also you have not even proven your initial assumption about the beams
fresniak 1 year ago
@fresniak "You have also several options such as pre-cutting steel"
Yet no one in the WTC reported this in the preceding months.
"initial assumption about the beams"
Not an assumption, fact. It would take less time to look at the pictures than keep arguing. Check them out, the beams are bent in. You can also clearly see the wing marks, and there is no evidence of explosions.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory I have looked at the beams they are not bent in most of them are straight and once again I told that a small plane (winged missile) was indeed used to pierce the first tower. So yes you may expect those beams that were hit by the missile to be bent in. But not all the rest. If the pictures are so clear why not to post your link to prove it? AFRAID? SCARED?
fresniak 1 year ago
@nobraintheory it was reported - heavy works were reported to be happening in the weeks before 911, allegedly to change the electricity system or something like that. MArvin Bush was even in the directive office of the securacom of wtc YOU LIAR
fresniak 1 year ago
@fresniak
"MArvin Bush was even in the directive office of the securacom of wtc YOU LIAR"
Nope, he left in 2000. WRONG AGAIN! You should really research this stuff before you post.
"it's easy just divide it into parts"
Just google WTC impact hole you lazy ass retard. WTF.
"So yes you may expect those beams that were hit by the missile to be bent in"
The missile that didn't exist yet with a wingspan of 8ft? How come the hole matches a 767 perfectly?
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory the hole was enlarged by the explosion. You seem to have difficulty in understanding the points of the opposing theory, or it's just convenient to keep ignoring them
The missile was a winged missile but the whole hole was created by the explosion, the Naudet video shows that the so called "wing hole" is created by secondary explosions and probably thermite.
fresniak 1 year ago
@fresniak - Make sure you don't mention being wrong about Marvin Bush, JASSMs, etc.
"looked at the picture by googling"
yay! Great job, it only took 2 days.
"There are even bent out columns."
There was an explosion.
"failed to show any evidence of what you claim"
10,000 witnesses, 43 amateur videos, 4 live news videos, hundreds of high res pictures, radar data, family members, firefighters, police, that all back me up. You've got nothing but September Clues.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory "Make sure you don't mention being wrong about Marvin Bush, JASSMs, etc." ONCE AGAIN YOU AVOID ANSWERING THE QUESTION Please JUST DIE and make the world a better place to live in
fresniak 1 year ago
@fresniak - Talking to you is like playing retard whack-a-mole. You say something stupid, I disprove it, then you never mention it again and go on to something else.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory "Talking to you is like playing retard whack-a-mole. You say something stupid, I disprove it, then you never mention it again and go on to something else." that's what you do actually. You didnt prove anything. The columns are mostly not bent in, you prefer concentration on marvin bush cause it was so marginal.
fresniak 1 year ago
@nobraintheory "10,000 witnesses, 43 amateur videos, 4 live news videos, hundreds of high res pictures, radar data, family members, firefighters, police, that all back me up. You've got nothing but September Clues."
They dont back you up. YOU CLAIM they do, but they don't. YOU LIAR AND SHILL
fresniak 1 year ago
@fresniak "They dont back you up."
Yes, they do. There is undeniably video, pictures, radar data, witness reports and passengers of the planes. Just saying there isn't doesn't make it go away.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory I agree on everything. There is undeniably FAKED video, pictures, radar data, witness reports and passengers of the planes
fresniak 1 year ago
@fresniak "There is undeniably FAKED video, pictures, radar data, witness reports and passengers of the planes"
Cool, just because you say it it must be true, even though you have no evidence. You know nothing about faking videos.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@fresniak "FAKED video, pictures, radar data, witness reports"
You should go into one of the fire stations near the WTC and call them liars. These people risk their lives to save pathetic retards like you.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory "You should go into one of the fire stations .." I NEVER SAID that any of the firefighters were liars. Rather the opposite, NY firefighters witnessed and described the destruction of the wtc as a controlled demolition: v=SXD3bAbZCow
In this video it is possible the firefighters were in good faith, but the naudet knew perfectly what was going on. btw this video was altered later on. check the difference between frame 0:57 and frame 1:30
fresniak 1 year ago
@fresniak "but the naudet knew perfectly what was going on"
Is that why the impact is out of focus? They were focused on the foreground. Why?
It seems to me you're suggesting this video is fake. What about it? How could the video be fake and the firefighters not in on it. For god sakes, the video is about the twoof movement saying the firefighters are lying. Be specific. You've got to have some theory or you wouldn't be here.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory Look any people with a brain watching the first seconds of this video understands that the cameraman knew perfectly where to point its lens. "How could the video be fake and the firefighters not in on it." You have really no imagination, the firefighters boss arranged that meeting with the naudet, the guys there could as well be completely unaware of the real reason of the meeting.
fresniak 1 year ago
@fresniak "Look any people with a brain watching the first seconds of this video understands that the cameraman knew perfectly where to point its lens."
Just not where to focus it? Seems to me it's obvious that he heard the noise like everyone else in the video, and looked towards the source. Of course to you that's impossible, and in order to point his camera where everyone is looking he had to be part of the biggest conspiracy of all time. Dipshit twoofer logic at it's finest.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory I am sayign the video was really shot by the naudets, who knew in advance they would have been capturing the first wtc impact. Some parts of the videos were clearly edited later on, once again compare frame 0:57 and frame 1:30, do not ignore what I write as usual for your convenience.
nobraintheory you are a shill and I feel no wish or need to further talk to you. I had already sent you there to hang yourself.
fresniak 1 year ago
@fresniak "once again compare frame 0:57 and frame 1:30, "
What about them? Just say what you're thinking, no need for games.
"do not ignore what I write as usual for your convenience."
Dude, I ignore most of what you say because you're a whiny bitch. I don't work for you, I'll do what I want. If you noticed something about the frames then say it or shut the fuck up.
"you are a shill and I feel no wish or need to further talk to you."
Then stop. No one is forcing you.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory I only watched the part where the impact happens and they run to the wtc. I am only judging this, not the firemen interviews.
fresniak 1 year ago
@nobraintheory I have looked at the picture by googling and I found there are no bent in columns except those of the missile impact. There are even bent out columns. The majority of beams seems like they were pre-cut and then made to explode. You're the fucking retard who has failed to show any evidence of what you claim
fresniak 1 year ago
@nobraintheory "Nope, he left in 2000. WRONG AGAIN! " so I am wrong by one year wow. Please report also the month? Beside that, is it just a coincidence? And you of course did not address the following cause it is convenient:"it was reported - heavy works were reported to be happening in the weeks before 911, allegedly to change the electricity system or something like that."
fresniak 1 year ago
@fresniak "so I am wrong by one year wow"
Yep. An important year, though, that means he wasn't in charge of security on 9/11.
"it was reported - heavy works were reported to be happening in the weeks before 911"
How does that support the no plane theory. Big buildings are under constant maintenance, and the electrical system has nothing to do with putting invisible explosives on the outside of the building in a plane hole shape, or inventing a hologram to fool the live witnesses.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory I have no time to loos with shills. You forgot to reply to why you are on these videos all the time. You forgot to mention your little dirty work for cia. Now go fuck yourself and just hang yourself
fresniak 1 year ago
@fresniak "I have no time to loos with shills. "
What?
"You forgot to reply to why you are on these videos all the time"
Because I'm a grown ass man and I do what I want. You're the one who makes videos about 911, not me.
"You forgot to mention your little dirty work for cia."
Yes, I work for the CIA, they pay me to make twoofers look stupid, it's the easiest job I've ever had.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory From your typical shill behavior I have come to the EASY Conclusion that you are a TRAITOR who deserve to die and perish of long extremely acute pain and hillness
fresniak 1 year ago
@fresniak - And from your retarded theories and piss poor writing skills I've come to the conclusion that you're a 12 year old in your mom's basement. If you're threatening to kill me then bring it on you little pussy. Bitches like you are only tough behind anonymous internet forums. In the real world, you're a meek little child.
"hillness"
Hahaha. You write like a retarded monkey.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory try to write in italian then come back to me you fuck-tard
fresniak 1 year ago
@nobraintheory "You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, it's basically just a bunch of stupid guesses." I am an experienced computer programmer, what are you instead? A paid shill or what?
fresniak 1 year ago
@nobraintheory Also they have not preplanted explosives randomly but very precisely in order to simulate the impact. I am not into explosives but am sure there is lot of techniques available to simulate some kind of damage you want.
fresniak 1 year ago
@nobraintheory They took control of media. If you research it there is some kind of emergency law in US which allows the military to take control of the media. They did it with the media complicity but they could have done it by force as well. I do not know it exactly, all what appears clear they have fed the same images from the same cameras to every single major media, using some kind of directing studio, I guess with many computers etc... the all thing was planned and tested before for sure
fresniak 1 year ago
@nobraintheory About the 40 so called amateur videos. First of all you forgot the main point. The media are telling their fake story of the events, now you have a truly amateur video showing that the facts went completely in a different way there are 2 possibilities. 1) You hand it to the very same media (even for money) 2) you become scared that what you recorded does not match the media lies at all and you decide to keep it for yourself (eventually u'd become a threatened eye-witness)
fresniak 1 year ago
@nobraintheory So you can guess that the amateur videos that were submitted to the media were manipulated with computer graphics and they had months to do it. The first amateur videos came out after some month. Except one (I think the one with the black plane) which most surely was not amateur at all. Also are you aware that many of the so called amateur videos are credited to video professional or other media related people? See the Fairbank case (it's a total scam)
fresniak 1 year ago
@fresniak "So you can guess that the amateur videos that were submitted to the media were manipulated with computer graphics"
No. People shot planes, then sent in the footage. That's fact. How come zero people came forward and said "there wasn't a plane in my footage when I sent it in!"
"The first amateur videos came out after some month."
That's a lie. Not true at all.
"other media related people?"
New York is the media capital of the world.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory "People shot planes," YOUR ASSUMPTION - "How come zero people came forward and said.there wasn't a plane in my footage when I sent it in." hmmm let's see maybe they were worried of seeing themselves hanging from the ceiling of their room next day by a simulated suicide?
You didn't even bother to research the stories behind all these videos, you'll find many also signed agreements with the media about usage claims.
fresniak 1 year ago
@fresniak "you'll find many also signed agreements with the media about usage claims."
It's called a release form, that's how news video works dude.
""People shot planes," YOUR ASSUMPTION"
It's NOT AN ASSUMPTION, people did shoot planes. Are you being purposely dense? Real people, like Jennifer Spell and Hezarkhani shot video of planes. They sent the tapes in. It's a fact.
"You didn't even bother to research the stories behind all these videos"
You have no idea what I researched.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory " It's a fact" it's a fact because you say it? or because the perps say it?
fresniak 1 year ago
@nobraintheory "hat's a lie. Not true at all." what is the truth then, when did the amateur videos come out? All of them came out after many days or months. I am sorry but I have researched this long ago, I just cant remember exactly how many days or months it was. If you know then tell it, so everyone can enjoy your knowledge
fresniak 1 year ago
@nobraintheory they didn't fool eyewitnesses. Media did everything to ignore them and their reports whch only speak about explosions and many reported explosions in the basement and so on..the media just reported THEIR "eyewitnesses" all people that were working for the media, and still some of them (that was probably not involved) reported elements of the truth that were promptly silenced by the anchorman in studio.remember the media were complicit, they couldnt have done it without them.
fresniak 1 year ago
@fresniak "they didn't fool eyewitnesses"
Correct, because everyone saw a plane. You can't tell me that tens of thousands of New Yorkers all hallucinated a plane. I know people who were there, do you? Have you ever talked to a witness?
"remember the media were complicit"
"The media" is made up of thousands of people, producers, editors, camera ops, anchors, grips, lighting, etc. How many people do you think were involved?
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory Also look into it. There are a lot of suicides related to 911. People probably who was first threatened and then killed. You cant close your eyes on these things. These are facts. People is threatened and killed, it's a mafia. They have the secret services doing their dirty job for them.
fresniak 1 year ago
@nobraintheory "Where did the plane parts come from that shot out of the building" which plane parts are you talking about and which footage? I' ve seen low quality nose-out video from fox and it is absurd to think a plane can penetrate the wtc steel frame building 2 times and have its nose intact) That was CG mistake. They had to do it live that's why went slightly wrong. It's easy to put CG on a video when you know what the zoom will be. it looks like they had a 4 seconds time delay to do it.
fresniak 1 year ago
@fresniak "nose-out video"
Uh, no. That's an engine. Watch the whole clip, you can see it fall to the street. People saw it hit, and it was found.
"That was CG mistake."
I teach CGI at a university and own a media company. What you're saying doesn't make sense. It would be an extra step to add a 'nose out.' It couldn't happen by mistake, and it's in all the videos so it makes even less sense.
"It's easy to put CG on a video"
You have no idea what you're talking about.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
I'm not convinced of the tv fakery theory but I am convinced that the towers could in no way fall the way they did simply from fires burning at the top floors. You can see the buildings falling from below the impact points. You can see explosions 30 stories below the falling floors.I was skeptical like every other American..something is wrong and we need to re-open an investigation on what really happened. Why would these firemen lie? What happened in the lobby? Explosions were heard b4 the hit.
dreyever 1 year ago
Well, I'm an atheist but I believe more in Jesus and God than I believe the no plane theory.
Espmell 1 year ago
OK SO I PLAYED IT BACK OVER AND OVER AND I THINK I SAW A LITTLE SOMETHING
MOOSALINY 1 year ago
@MOOSALINY and people wonder how conspiracy theories are created? At least you admitted you finally saw a plane or "a little something" hit the tower. The only problem is that for every person, like you, who doesn't see the plane but after a while sees it, there's twenty people who doesn't see the plane, then stop watching and goes out claiming it was a hoax.
Espmell 1 year ago
@Espmell YEAH I DID FINALLY SEE IT. I DONT LIKE TO JUST ASSUME THINGS WITHOUT BEING DEFINITELY SURE. I WROTE THE FIRST COMMENT WITHOUT DOUBLE CHECKING.
MOOSALINY 1 year ago
@MOOSALINY well, for me it's quite amazing you didn't see it in the first place. Do you have a 2 inch monitor?
Since you both have the balls to admit you were wrong AND answer my comment I'll ask you another one; Are you one of those believing no planes hit the WTC or do you both agree it was a plane in this video AND the video is real? I'm going to bed so don't expect a reply until tomorrow ;)
Espmell 1 year ago
@Espmell WELL I ALWAYS BELIEVED PLANES HIT THE BUILDINGS. I ONLY POSTED THE COMMENT BECAUSE I WAS CONFUSED ABOUT WHERE THE PLANE WAS. IM NOT ONE OF THE WTC THEORIST. TO BE HONEST I DONT KNOW WHO IS BEHIND WHAT HAPPENED. I DONT TRUST ANYONE BUT JESUS. THATS ALL I KNOW TO DO. IM JUST AN ONLOOKER NOT A DEBATOR.
MOOSALINY 1 year ago
WHEN THE FIREFIGHTER LOOKED UP HE LOOKED UP IN THE DIRECTION THAT WOULD INSIST THAT WHEN THE CAMERA TURNED AROUND AND UPWARD WE WOULD SEE A PLANE FLY INTO THE BUILDING. WHERE THE HELL IS THE PLANE THAT TEH FIREFIGHTER WAS LOOKING AT. I SURE DIDNT SEE IT. IF IT HIT ON THE OTHER SIDE THEN HE SHOUDL HAVE BEEN LOOKING UPWARD TOWARDS HIS LEFT AND THE PLANE WOULD HAVE CIRCLED A LITTLE BIT AND HIT ON THE OTHER SIDE BUT EVEN THEN WE WOULD HAVE SEEN IT FLY AROUND THE BUILDING SOME.
MOOSALINY 1 year ago
inside JOB PERIOD YOU PEOPLE REALLY NEED JOBS OR A DATE.
MY BROTHER WAS MURDERED ON THIS DAY, AND THIS GOV HAD BOTH HANDS IN THE PLOT. sO PLEASE TAKE YOUR GOV SHOW SOME PLACE ELSE,TRY FOX THEY LIKE PEOPLE LIKE YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!
01hound 1 year ago
It looks like the camera operator KNEW to point his camera at the exact time, as if he was prepped. ANYONE AGREE???
themomentofclarity 1 year ago
@themomentofclarity ahh, you stupid fuck. desperately holding on to whatever tiny straw you can find. These videos are being analysed beyond any logic! You "no plane" guys are starting to piss me off. You don't have the brains to understand the extend of what you're indicating!
Espmell 1 year ago
@Espmell WOW big words dude. Explain to me why the video shooter framed up the tip of the tower before it hit asshole, ever heard of an orgy of evidence? the camera man was PREPPED, no argument.
themomentofclarity 1 year ago
@themomentofclarity I would have liked to discuss with you but I'm giving up. I've spent a lot of days trying to ask a simple question to you guys; How many people would be involved if the no plane theory is right. Not a single one of you are able to answer it. It seems like none of you is willing to spend a second of thought into that question. So as long as I don't get a single answer to my question, I'm done discussion on youtube! Merry Christmas!
Espmell 1 year ago
@Espmell i am not suggesting a "no plane theory" i am suggesting the camera man knew where the plane was going to hit
themomentofclarity 1 year ago
@Espmell If u'd ask the questions correctly and with open mind you would probably get more answers. First of all conspiracy deniers often think in terms of "how many people should be involved" or "the gvt would never do this" etc..instead you should first focus on evidences. Second this operation was studied for years by the perps. Do you think they didn't expect people to come out and speak the truth? They knew it was mandatory to take control of the ms media, and that's what happened on 911
fresniak 1 year ago
Naudit Brothers: How big is the chance to make a documentary in NY on 9/11? Let's say 1/1000. Firedepartement? 1/50. Not inside or on the road 1/2. cameraman on the right side of the road 1/4 camera not on tripod 1/2 camera running 1/3 wtc not blocked by passengers or buildings 1/5 have all the same luck on the second hit? you be the judge!
telstar1903 1 year ago
Truthinator - you are a pathetic liitle twerp.
Let me meet you one day :-)
cyanideisabitterpill 1 year ago
It is truely pathetic that you have to make these men out to be liars when they had to witness something that horrible. This is a disrespect to all of the people who passed away that day and their families. These guys are braver than you could ever hope to be. They have been through enough so they do not need you to put them down and call them liars. They were rushed and trying to save lives. Of course they are not going to remember every little thing the same way. Get a life.
bamachic10 1 year ago
don't you think this was just fucking horrifying? don't you think calling it a cover up is a little disrepctfull to the families of the dead...the same dead americans that had to witness fellow crew members nearly decapitated with utility knives, then flown wildly into a building? what about flight 93...do you thnk they deserve truther lies?you nerds have nothing better to do than be paranoid losers sitting in your mommys basements at computers u used to play wow and jerk off to making up lies?
maciverandy 1 year ago
all these interviews smack of something.
DINGLEtheBERRY 1 year ago
I don't get it. Why are you saying the firefighters are liars? They are telling their stories as far as I understand. The part about the bodies falling is so sad. I don't get why you're posting a video and branding them liars. They did the best they could.
sausagedogheaven 1 year ago 2
EVERYONE claiming no planes against WTC 1 and 2 is a misinformationist working for Coverup squads trying to make the real Truth Movement look bad by association. The best anyone can say is that perhaps it was not flight 175 that hit tower 2 based on the under belly analysis of the plane...but it was still some sort of plane just ask Stanley Prainmanth about the wing sticking out of his office upon impact
LJARSONBECK 1 year ago
As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country’s history.
mfriedlin 1 year ago
The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft.
mfriedlin 1 year ago
@mfriedlin Are you serious? Look at the photos of wreckage at the Pentagon and the Shanksville crashsite. Hell, there's even debris from the planes that hit the WTC that have been photographed. "Not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced?" Are you serious? What are you suggesting then? Are you saying that the four aircraft just magically disappeared?
BlindNinja222 1 year ago
Oh yea, so now the FDNY is in on the conspiracy... Whats next? The NYPD? Or maybe the old lady living down the street? Come on, be serious. You "Truthers" are looking like "LOSERS"...
NYSP22DAVID 1 year ago
@LumpyRevolution
No planers ARE no brainers!
DTD110865 1 year ago
I can't believe people NOT behind this, are STILL debating it.
I came from the "other side", but Now, the evidence is so overwhelming, that even if 8/10ths of it were false, the Truth would Still be Obvious beyond comprehension.
ANYONE, with; 1) A mind that remains true & honest to themselves,
& 2) 10 seconds to watch the purposely demolished buildings free fall, KNOWS the Truth.
It is an engineering fact, that the ONLY way to drop those building w/o toppling into other one's, is Demolition(.)
TheSevnthWarrior 1 year ago
The Media Response to 9/11 dealt with the New Statesman's grudging recognition of Dr. David Ray Griffin, the world's "top truther" (as it dubbed him), placing him number 41 among "The 50 People Who Matter Today."1 Since this admission in September 2009, the issue has gathered increasing momentum
mfriedlin 1 year ago
Although the new scientific evidence against the official story of 9/11 was not reported in the mainstream British or North American media, it did receive attention in continental Europe.
mfriedlin 1 year ago
The airplane was UA175, a Boeing 767-200, shortly before crashing into World Trade Center Tower 2. Based on analysis of radar data, the National Transportation and Safety Board reported the groundspeed just before impact as 510 knots. This is well beyond the maximum operating velocity of 360 knots, and maximum dive velocity of 410 the 767 flew well beyond its flight envelope, was controllable, and managed to hit a relatively small target.
mfriedlin 1 year ago
Israel's secret and super-secure nuclear lab is where the extremely powerful super-thermite of 9-11 was designed. The chief scientists involved in the manufacturing of the nano-composite used to pulverize the World Trade Center on 9-11
mfriedlin 1 year ago
In any case, it is important for those seeking the truth about 9/11 to consider what organizations and people had access to the technologies that were used to accomplish the deceptive demolition of the WTC buildings. It is also important to recognize the links between those who had access to the technologies, those who had access to the buildings, and those who produced the clearly false official reports
mfriedlin 1 year ago
you truthers are an insult to america and the people who died trying to save others. you only look at evidence that helps you and igonre actual facts. Not to mention at this point you are so convinced it was an inside job you would never admit you are wrong out of pride and the fact you wasted the last 9 years believing in something thats bullshit.
jimsutube123 1 year ago
@jimsutube123
Is this the best script handed out to you? Evidence that helps ignore actual facts? Like what? So convinced?? If we as Americans are "convinced" it was an inside job, no one would be searching any further...idiot. Yes, 9 years. Incredible isn't it? 9 long years...and although a lot of evidence has been destroyed by all of those involved, still common people, professionals, educated in the field have come forward exposing lie after lie. Common sense is fantastic.
LVEbonys 1 year ago
@jimsutube123
You might want read 'Top 10 Connetions between NIST and Nano thermite'.
Interesting for shills like you.
No facts....
Right.............
mfriedlin 1 year ago
NARK
lowryder2able 1 year ago
You know when you make insulting remarks it gives your intentions dead away.
Hard for me to believe there are any people who can actually type who couild believe the official fairytale about 9/11. Leads me to believe either there are some people who are just stuck in a false paradigm or they're actually paid to post nonsense. Check ae911truth(dot)org the REAL SCIENCE says inside job.
Case closed.....
MrRiceowlex 1 year ago
@MrRiceowlex
Just look at the imposed comments on this video....all desperate comments to pull people off thinking there was actually something very wrong going on with the fairytale and then uses the NYC firefighter role as a backdoor to dis-inform. Deviate the masses into controlled thought. What about the first responders who are being denied proper health care and let to rot. Why do you think that is happening. Kill silently those who know and saw? Clever.
LVEbonys 1 year ago
@LVEbonys talk that shit around the family members of those suffering and see how you long you last
jimsutube123 1 year ago
@jimsutube123
Yes, the family members. Always use the family members to set loose the emotional factor and condem all who question.
Listen Jimmy, it's time that child molestors such as you get a life. You know this is all bullshit. Don't talk suffering to me. I am related to a family member and EACH AND EVERY ONE of those that have been involved in this tragedy are looking for answers outside the fairytale. Insult to America? What an asshole you are.
LVEbonys 1 year ago
@LVEbonys they are looking for answers and they got them, keep them upset with your lies, good for you what a friend. im sure they apprecite it when you try and convince them their own govt did it with random so called facts. You guys want it to be an inside job, now why is that?
jimsutube123 1 year ago
@jimsutube123
"they are looking for answers and they got them"....? From who? YouTube videos and fantasy explanations from the media? It must be a difficult assignment you have, not having a conscience having to troll and lie to fellow Americans. It pays the bills I guess plus PX access for beer, can't beat that can you.
Enjoy your weekend
LVEbonys 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@911TRUTHINATOR Are the 1,200 professional architects and engineers of ae911truth(dot)org LIARS ? They have the scientific peer reviewed and approved forensics that determined WTC buildings 1, 2 and 7 were professionally demolished. I'd say these engineers have gone to a lot of time, expense and trouble because they know this was a mass murder. Could you round up 1,200 professionals who would stake their careers and possible jailtime on lies ?
MrRiceowlex 1 year ago
I am kind of glad I was the 88th person to vote on this video making it 44 for and 44 against. Cause that's basically where I am these days, right in the goddamn middle yet again. I was convinced at one point that it was a vast conspiracy and as old habits die hard I still have my suspicions, but I can't cling to them as factual anymore. It wasn't this video that did it, its the amount of people that are basing everything on just gut feelings. Emotional conclusions are very dangerous.
123backinyerface 1 year ago
@123backinyerface Quite right. At first I was in the there with you.
The thing that convinced me was the discovery on the nano thermite in the WTC dust.
Study the manufacture of nano thermatic materials and its plain that this substance was made in an advanced weapons lab in the U.S.
Marvin Bush on the Securom board and the media wont mention him?
That's just a little too much.
Throw in the anthrax, the "put" options and it seems to have CIA/military intelligence written all over it.
mfriedlin 1 year ago
The guy withe the gas metre lost his brother in wtc 2 so why would he lie
grenseel 1 year ago
@grenseel Lie about what?
His death on lntensifies my desire to find the truth, wherever that leads.
All of the facts so far indicate a monsterous conclusion whose implications will affect us for the rest of our lives.
Why do the discusion points I raise provoke anger, or fear, in some people?
mfriedlin 1 year ago
I have seen this and I believe the truth will win, despite the awesome forces up against us.
The CIA, military intelligence, the Mossad, corporate controlled media, they are the true powers....
Nano thermite in the WTC dust could be the clincher, if the media will "discover" it.
Thanks to Gage and Jones for leading the way to the truth.
mfriedlin 1 year ago
@mfriedlin Instead of trading moronic, jr. high insults with you why don't you tell us exactly why they are such morons, you know, like me.
Having trouble responding to the issues i've discussed?
Your silence speaks volumes.
Your blind faith is staggering.
Please do inform us, you know with real issues instead of insults, ego driven I'm sure.
Once again, why exactly are Gage ang jones morons?
mfriedlin 1 year ago
911toofinator do you expect people to believe that cave dwelling, boxcutter wielding, turban wearing, sand loving highjackers highjacked highjacked-planes keeping their balance on speeding hijacked-planes and flew three planes with military precision?
since you are an expert in highjacking, terrorism, and boxcutter wielding i guess it would make sense to troll on youtube.
you are better off proving god exists than proving 9/11 WASNT an inside job.
vilane421 1 year ago
@vilane421
check out the video
I DENY YOUR HOLY FOOTAGE