Serena would lose to all the men ranked up to about 500, but she would beat some in the top 1000 for definite. If u see challenger and future series, some of these men play at a much lower level than she does. She certainly wouldn't embarrass herself anyway.
I saw Serena play a practice match against Djokovic at Australian Open last year and she was killing him in a lot of rallies...So definitely she can beat some guys.
@sayuridp Serena would lose to a good division 1 college male player. As for any man on the ATP tour ranked in the top 1000-1500 would crush her easily.
There's speculation that the top 3000th and up on the men's side can beat any top 10 women.
Any doubt? Just look at how miserable women attempt to hold their serves. Men have no issues holding serves. Add in the pace and power of groundies and their abilities to volley, most men would cake walk against most women counterparts.
women player do not deserve the smae prize money as men. women go 3 sets men go 5 sets the qualitiy of the womens game is nothing vompared to the mens the top 10, 000 men will all beat williams. who would most peopl rather see federer and nedal go 5 sets or wiliams and clisters go 3 sets
Personally I'm not interested in how a female would do against a male in any sport because it's not a fair comparison. It's like discussing how Usain Bolt would do against a leopard. The top females are as good as is possible for a woman and the best males are as good as is possible for a male - that's why we have seperate competitions.
@jhar26 thats all true and im all for equal rights but the thing i dont understand is women now get the same prize money as the men in the major torneys but yet they play best out of 3 whilethe men play best out of 5 do u think that is fair???
@maccajoe probably not. On the other hand, the men get more prize money on the regular tour than the women, even though both sexes play best out of 3 in those tournaments. The equal prize money in the slams is more a symbolic gesture than anything else. But to tell you the truth, I'm more worried about what wage slaves like you and me get payed than about the millions that Fed, Rafa, Serena or Wozzy get. ;)
i don't think that williams sister have a trouble to play with some of the atp top 20 because they play to tough and when serena is on no one can stop them
@todik A journey man pro, Karsteen Braash, who was ranked in the two hundreds played Serena during her slam year and beat her 6-1 and beat Venus 6-0 while smoking a few cigarettes and drinking a few beers. This silenced Serena on her talk of maybe playing on the men's tour since she was so dominate during her slam run.
@tlonsinkie Definitely, but so what? Men have a physical advantage. It's like when you would let even a average heavyweight box against Manny Pacquiao. No matter how good he is, Manny would never be able to overcome the physical disadvantage. Serena is the best female player of her era. She deserves praise for that. How she would do against a male is irrelevant. If not, women better give up on sports altogether since no matter what they achieve, it's never going to be good enough.
I agree with you until money comes into it. The feminist principles that got women equal rights to begin with were based on paying someone for their performance, not because they belonged to an arbitrarily defined group.
The problem is even greater when the groups overlap. Some men are born with less genetic ability than some women, but they do not get special treatment because they were born in the wrong group. Its discrimination at its finest under the guise of progress.
@tlonsinkie The whole top 1000 not for sure, but according to Lea Pericoli the top 500 probably yes..It's almost impossible surpass someone faster and stronger if equally trained.
@tlonsinkie Do you really think so? (not about the Fed bit) She serves faster than a lot of males... like 125mph no? And her ground strokes are bombs. She may not have the best movement but I think she'd beat a lot of men. She's got bigger guns than most of them!! :)
No everyone in the ATP top 1000 could beat the woman world number one!
Especially these days when there isn't a really dominant one.
Karsten Braasch was actually #203 when he played against the williams sisters after the '98 Aussie Open...he beat serena 6:1, venus 6:2 and he said after the match he was playing like #600 that day because he did not take it seriously.
That time Venus and Serena were the utterly dominant female players,both in their primes.
The truth always matters. The guys are much better. Would the women like it if we compared them with 10-year-old kids? In the same way, guys want to be given credit for the abilities they have and not be equated with lesser competition.
In order to end once and for all the "Battle of the sexes" debate, I propose a match Federer vs. Sharapova in five sets without handicaps/funny rules and with a huge money prize so that they both play "seriously".
If Sharapova wins, every men on the planet will bend over and acknowledge women as their superiors. (but you know what? : ain't gonna happen.)
Yeah he won the French Open in 1983, was no.3 in singles, no.1 in doubles and was inducted into the international tennis hall of fame a couple of years ago.
Serena would lose to all the men ranked up to about 500, but she would beat some in the top 1000 for definite. If u see challenger and future series, some of these men play at a much lower level than she does. She certainly wouldn't embarrass herself anyway.
wiyyiyum 3 months ago
Stop bringing Serena into this video comment, she's irrelevant here
cabomba 8 months ago
I saw Serena play a practice match against Djokovic at Australian Open last year and she was killing him in a lot of rallies...So definitely she can beat some guys.
chrisak49 1 year ago
Serena could beat anyone male or female.
sayuridp 1 year ago
@sayuridp eeeeeehm no lol....
bamibalboy 1 year ago
@sayuridp Serena would lose to a good division 1 college male player. As for any man on the ATP tour ranked in the top 1000-1500 would crush her easily.
iamtman1 8 months ago
why does he have to dress like a dork
quest8899 1 year ago
There's speculation that the top 3000th and up on the men's side can beat any top 10 women.
Any doubt? Just look at how miserable women attempt to hold their serves. Men have no issues holding serves. Add in the pace and power of groundies and their abilities to volley, most men would cake walk against most women counterparts.
lureyourkidsinvan 1 year ago
women player do not deserve the smae prize money as men. women go 3 sets men go 5 sets the qualitiy of the womens game is nothing vompared to the mens the top 10, 000 men will all beat williams. who would most peopl rather see federer and nedal go 5 sets or wiliams and clisters go 3 sets
TheFK93 1 year ago
Reminds me of how the guys always bully the women in mixed doubles.
Also, LMFAO @ Yannick Noah cross-dressing. He wasn't trying at all! At least he pretended to.
fire1202 1 year ago
Comment removed
j3ss31214 1 year ago
but women are as strong and as important as men?.....
88luda88 1 year ago
Personally I'm not interested in how a female would do against a male in any sport because it's not a fair comparison. It's like discussing how Usain Bolt would do against a leopard. The top females are as good as is possible for a woman and the best males are as good as is possible for a male - that's why we have seperate competitions.
jhar26 2 years ago 16
@jhar26 thats all true and im all for equal rights but the thing i dont understand is women now get the same prize money as the men in the major torneys but yet they play best out of 3 whilethe men play best out of 5 do u think that is fair???
maccajoe 1 year ago
@maccajoe probably not. On the other hand, the men get more prize money on the regular tour than the women, even though both sexes play best out of 3 in those tournaments. The equal prize money in the slams is more a symbolic gesture than anything else. But to tell you the truth, I'm more worried about what wage slaves like you and me get payed than about the millions that Fed, Rafa, Serena or Wozzy get. ;)
jhar26 1 year ago
@jhar26 yea so they should receive the same money there if they play the same sets, yea lololol true they are set 4 lyfe now
maccajoe 1 year ago
@jhar26 well Leopard versus a human being is a bit of an exaggeration but I see your point.
Oryem 10 months ago
i don't think that williams sister have a trouble to play with some of the atp top 20 because they play to tough and when serena is on no one can stop them
todik 2 years ago
i`m sure they would do
daniolitheone 2 years ago
@todik A journey man pro, Karsteen Braash, who was ranked in the two hundreds played Serena during her slam year and beat her 6-1 and beat Venus 6-0 while smoking a few cigarettes and drinking a few beers. This silenced Serena on her talk of maybe playing on the men's tour since she was so dominate during her slam run.
jpeyton62 1 year ago
@jpeyton62 he played serena when she was 16, it was not in her slam year.
wiyyiyum 3 months ago
Federer would beat Serena Williams 6-0 6-0. The whole top 1000 by the men would beat Williams.
tlonsinkie 2 years ago 34
@tlonsinkie but if she would play with venus :)...then it wouldnt be so easy :)
DarkSiteOfAngel 1 year ago
@tlonsinkie Penus to haha
mariascreamapova 1 year ago
@tlonsinkie Definitely, but so what? Men have a physical advantage. It's like when you would let even a average heavyweight box against Manny Pacquiao. No matter how good he is, Manny would never be able to overcome the physical disadvantage. Serena is the best female player of her era. She deserves praise for that. How she would do against a male is irrelevant. If not, women better give up on sports altogether since no matter what they achieve, it's never going to be good enough.
jhar26 1 year ago
@jhar26
I agree with you until money comes into it. The feminist principles that got women equal rights to begin with were based on paying someone for their performance, not because they belonged to an arbitrarily defined group.
The problem is even greater when the groups overlap. Some men are born with less genetic ability than some women, but they do not get special treatment because they were born in the wrong group. Its discrimination at its finest under the guise of progress.
alin1975 1 year ago
@tlonsinkie The whole top 1000 not for sure, but according to Lea Pericoli the top 500 probably yes..It's almost impossible surpass someone faster and stronger if equally trained.
furaskin 8 months ago
@tlonsinkie Do you really think so? (not about the Fed bit) She serves faster than a lot of males... like 125mph no? And her ground strokes are bombs. She may not have the best movement but I think she'd beat a lot of men. She's got bigger guns than most of them!! :)
stubberz 7 months ago
@stubberz Yes, she serves fast, but with no variation. Same for the groundstrokes. If you give her a slice she doesn't know to handle it.
tlonsinkie 7 months ago
i think serena and federer should have a serious match as they are the only two players who have won all slams still playing.
jackhurst85 2 years ago
everyone in the ATP top 200 would beat WTA no 1! oh wait, all but rainer schuettler, coz hes a pussy lol!
destoroy4 2 years ago
No everyone in the ATP top 1000 could beat the woman world number one!
Especially these days when there isn't a really dominant one.
Karsten Braasch was actually #203 when he played against the williams sisters after the '98 Aussie Open...he beat serena 6:1, venus 6:2 and he said after the match he was playing like #600 that day because he did not take it seriously.
That time Venus and Serena were the utterly dominant female players,both in their primes.
SSJPeter 2 years ago
um wow, im kind of shock with noah wearing....that
plus should it really matter if girls beat guys or guys beat girls whatever, im still 13
Paramorerocks19 2 years ago
The truth always matters. The guys are much better. Would the women like it if we compared them with 10-year-old kids? In the same way, guys want to be given credit for the abilities they have and not be equated with lesser competition.
OutlanderWarrior 2 years ago
tennisbenelux . com
nieuw tennisforum! aub join het en praat gezellig over tennis en nog veel meer
tennisbenelux 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
sharapova ofcourse will win and woman is superior to man for ever
salimashour 3 years ago
:)))
ilian51378 3 years ago
In order to end once and for all the "Battle of the sexes" debate, I propose a match Federer vs. Sharapova in five sets without handicaps/funny rules and with a huge money prize so that they both play "seriously".
If Sharapova wins, every men on the planet will bend over and acknowledge women as their superiors. (but you know what? : ain't gonna happen.)
darkoverlord2008 3 years ago
sharapova? why not williams
dorker1992 3 years ago
ok Nadal vs. Williams
sugardaddy815 3 years ago
Folks, the men can literally beat the women 6-0, 6-0. And I'm a tennis pro, so I'm in a position to know.
OutlanderWarrior 3 years ago
i'd rather have Nadal representing men...
Boromir1 2 years ago
Back when I wrote the comment, Federer was still the king. I stand corrected.
sugardaddy815 2 years ago
but would you really want to see nadal in a skirt and bra...? lol
SoccerKid283 2 years ago
sharapova isnt gonna win federer, but i bet serena, venus, safin , or heinin for sure will give him a run for his money
djollyboy 2 years ago
Any female player would have trouble winning 5 points in a match against federer or any of the ATP top 20!
SSJPeter 2 years ago 5
He's a 40 something year-old tennis hall of famer. He used to be famous in the 80's.
Aodaliyah 4 years ago
yep he's yannick noah 1983 french open champion
kim058 5 years ago
wtf...
who's this guy?
BassThrasher 5 years ago
his name is yannick noah i think and he was a famous tennis player back in the day.
musicfan418 5 years ago
Yeah he won the French Open in 1983, was no.3 in singles, no.1 in doubles and was inducted into the international tennis hall of fame a couple of years ago.
ozuser 5 years ago