Added: 1 year ago
From: BI30
Views: 1,105
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (42)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • These people are going to be fuming when Obama wins in 2012. LOL

    Mass suicides ? Hopefully !

  • ... Another point, I think Larouche is just sour grapes that a black man actually became president when he has been running for most of his life and has never won and never will....

  • You gotta be fucking kidding... These people are fucking crazy. First they wanted Bush impeached, they then focused on impeaching Cheney (yes you read that correctly), now they want to impeach Obama... On what grounds? Listen, I don't support Obama and think he's so far only proven to be another lying sack of shit politician, but the immaturity and tasteless propaganda has got to stop. These people actually claim Obama is a "subject" of the British Empire and loads of other looney claims.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • (3) Article 2 Section 1 No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

    (4) By (1), (2), and (3), John McCain is eligible to become President of the United States.

    Quod Erat Demonstrandum.

  • (2) Anyone who aquires U.S. citizenship at the time of birth is a natural born citizen, according to the principle of jus sanguinis.

  • (1) If a child is born to two U.S. citizen parents abroad, and if either U.S. citizen parent has resided in the United States for any length of time prior to the birth of the child, the child acquires U.S. citizenship at the time of birth under the provisions of Section 301 (c) of the United States Immigration and Nationality Act. Failure to file consular form FS-240 does not constitute a revokation or voluntary reliquishment of U.S. citizenship.

  • LaRouche and his followers are not the brightest group around. How can you impeach an illegal president anyways? He was born in Kenya. His grandmother was a witness. The President of Kenya said Obama was born in Kenya. Is he a liar? Obama should be removed from the White House in shackles and put away for life for illegally holding the position of President!

  • @truthforever1 If you are one of the "Birther" nuts that believe President Obama "was born in Kenya", you really have no place questioning the intelligence of the LaRouche nitwits.

  • @BI30 What I question is how and why a President can be elected without proof of being born in this country? I'm not saying show a document that says there is a birth certificate on file. Show the darn birth certificate. Don't tell me I don't have a right to see the original birth certificate. I'm born here and a citizen. I have a right to make sure we don't bend the rules for anyone. As I said above, his Kenyan grandmother was a witness that he was born in Kenya. Is she a liar?

  • @truthforever1 You might want to visit FactChec.org. Obama's REAL and actual birth certificate is on file and has been verified by independent sources. The *Birthers* on the other hand dismiss the "issued" (aka "short-form" BC) and want to see his "long form" BC. But Hawaii digitized all government records in the 80's and destroyed the paper copies. So people are demanding he produce a document that no longer exists. Meanwhile, McCain was born on a U.S. Army base in Panama. Grandma has dementia.

  • @BI30 U.S. Army base in Panama is part the U.S.A. Why even raise that as a argument? Kenya is not part of the U.S.A. "I am not aware of any birth certificate records that have been destroyed by the department," Janice Okubo, public information officer for the Hawaii DOH, told WND. "When the department went electronic in 2001, vital records, whether in paper form or any other form, [were] maintained. We don't destroy records." CNN Chief Jon Klein is wrong. So why not show us the certificate

  • @truthforever1 Correct, though according to the 14th Amendment, a child born on the premises of such a facility "is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States" and does not acquire U.S. citizenship by reason of birth, thereby not meeting the Art1\Sec1 eligibility requirement. Would that be the same "Janice Okubo" that called the Birthers "crazy" last year? When you start quoting World Nut Daily in response to FactCheck,org, you're on shaky ground.

  • @BI30 Touché The question is not McCain but Obama. However, I will give you a valid a 4 part proof I found supporting McCain's Natural birth right that I modified slightly modified. I will post in parts due to lack of space.

  • @truthforever1 I'm not arguing McCain would of been ineligible, only pointing out that there is just as legitimate a case to be made (read: none) of McCain's eligibility. Despite an actual birth certificate and a birth announcement in the Honolulu newspaper, Birthers cite the befuddled word of an old woman that remembers the birth of a grandchild whose pregnant mother never left the United States (or somehow made it to Africa w/o obtaining a passport.) Birthers are as nuts as 9/11 Truthers.

  •  Obama's approval ratings are still 43%, :)))))

  • It is good to see "impeach obama" signs. Healthy!

  • Suck it up bitch its payback time. You liberals wouldn't stop calling for Bush's assasination and impeachment now the shoe is on the other foot. The problem here is Obama is more hated than Bush and you don't like it.

  • @micsc50 I don't recall anyone calling for Bush's assassination. And Obama's approval ratings are still over 50%, whereas Bush was at 24% upon leaving office.

  • Lyndon LaRouche should not be referred to as a crackpot and I would bet dollars to donuts that Lyndon LaRouche has no idea about this.

  • @Landrew120880 Where do you think his supporters get these ideas?

  • @BI30 ... The Tea Party comes to mind (aside from the Hitler thing, The Know Nothing Party from the 1850's.) Yes, you are correct about Lyndon. I was very surprised to see his website with all of the Obama/Hitler ideas. I need to catch up! Thanx for seting me str8.

  • Larouche has quite the little cult there doesn't he?

  • I say let them have their ridiculous kiosk. On another note, can you imagine if someone tried to pull that sh!t on the previous administration?

    This is a great example of how the current president has much more respect for the constitution than presidents who supported such things as the patriot act.

  • impeach him already

  • @rumpelstillskin65 If, after all the documented crimes of George Bush, we can't impeach him, just what crime exactly do you believe Obama can be impeached for?

  • free speech bitches STFU

  • @WSthe3rd Actually, the airport is private property. The airport is wrong if it believes it must provide facilities to someone assaulting travelers with hate speech (which also is not protected).

  • @BI30

    Hate Speech is not against the law in the United States. The First Amendment prohibits governments from regulating the content of speech, subject to a few recognized exceptions such as defamation and incitement to riot.

  • @BI30

    George Bush Intercontinental Airport

    Airport type: Public

    Owner/Operator: Houston Airport System

    Houston Airport System (HAS) is a department of the City of Houston, Texas, United States, i.e., local GOVERNMENT; therefore, NOT private property.

  • @bjphysics Mea culpa. Though there is no statute requiring them to provide a kiosk or even favorable placement (ala Bush's "free speech zones").

  • @BI30

    Not sure about the statute part but having provided these crackpots favorable space the Houston Airport System is now obligated to provide the opportunity to all points-of-view on a content neutral basis. I suggest an

    “Our Forefathers Fought the Nazis and Died for the Nuremberg Principles – Baby Bush to the Hague” kiosk.

    Probably need to sex up the name length there but that is the general idea.

  • @BI30 #1 nobody is assaulting anyone

    #2 its not hate speech at all

    its people like yourself that twists everything around to make it worse than it really is if you dont like it move on.

    a jewish guy years ago was offended by a christmas tree and now there is no christmas trees in airports anymore, do you see what im getting at?

    im almost positive that because obama is black you feel everyone is racist? well it has nothing to do with that, hes a horrible president with no love for USA

  • @WSthe3rd I'l save the "too stupid for words" critique for later. I'm sorry, but if comparing President Obama to Hitler for crissakes doesn't qualify as "hate speech", I'm not sure where you draw the line. I never called the protester a "racist", so when you accuse me of defending Obama "because he's black", you're projecting. "No love for the USA"? How are we suppose to take you seriously?

  • @WSthe3rd ...How do you define "love for his country"? If a president loves his country, he wouldn't be the one to attack it for alternative purposes.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more