Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (59)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Looks like I found a nice gift for my mother in law!

  • Watchin topgear handlewitcare10 lol

  • Thumbs up if your watching this because of TopGear....

  • In 1982 when I was 17 I had a 1973, Sky Blue, Ford, Pinto. BOY ! What a piece of shit. It was given to me by my Uncle who NEVER took care of i ! And he NEVER had a problem with it. I tuned it up, changed the oil, flushed of the radiator. Since then I gave me problems. I was better off taking a bus to school. Those were the days

  • I saw a picture with fire on it, so I clicked it.

  • Lol my dad and mom when I was a baby boy owned 3 of these cars. 1 wagon and 2 hatches. The funniest part my Grandma owned one and also my uncle at the same time. I rode in all of them in the back strapped in with a car seat. Im still alive thank god after watching this all it would have took was a buzzed up person in anything back then to do this kinda damage. What a joke....

  • wow, the one ford car that sucked in crash tests, that's why every chevy car now has sucky crash tests, and ford is always a top safety pick. so get on all of you with your head up chevys ass!!!

  • yea but you see at the end the chevy is in a pit of fire, bumper sticker: warning pinto, follow at your own risk, not the drivers

  • wow even real fire in videos from the 70s still look fake haha

  • Well at least the 2.3L Ford engine lasted longer than the aluminum Chevy Vega engines.

  • The early Mustangs do the same thing.

  • The reazon why the pinto blew up is because they have the gas tank in the rear end

  • @0:30 ...and the car doors JAM in the event of a crash. o_o

    What, did Ford contract Aperture Science to build these abominations?!?

  • The more I think about how Ford Motor Company made the conscious decision to put profit over safety, the angrier I become.

  • @accordguy0325 All car makers have done it before and still do to a certain degree.

  • @accordguy0325< It wasn't Ford it was the NHTSB that determined Risk/benefit. Not every crash resulted in tank penetration. Ford offered VOLUNTARY recall and fixed the cars at their own expense of $11 per car. The fix btw, was to move the tank two inches and weld a flashing behind it to prevent crushing and intrusions. The NHTSB determined there were simply not enough rear end crashes to force mandatory recalls.

  • I had a 73 Impala in 1975. The bumper could snap a light pole down without leaving a mark! Impala Custom Coupe; Blue, with white top and white interior. That was a real car.

  • Hesoyam, anyone?

  • search for dateline gm trucks 1993 

  • @tmathis151 there was an expose' on the supposed Chevy truck explosions. It was a done for TV special effects crash test. They could never get it to actually explode so they set some explosives in the truck. There never was an actual incident where a Chevy truck exploded in flames in the real world, all this came out in a court case because the 'news' crew was sued successfully for millions of dollars.

  • quick douse the flames so we can actually get test evidence!

  • the occupants in the chevy wake up, "did we do a fender bender???"

    the occupants of the pinto make up, "hey did you put the ac on ho..... AHHHHHHHH IM BURNING ALIVEEEEE!!!!!"

  • Its too bad more people have been killed in the Chevrolet truck with gas tanks outside the frame and that wad swept under the rug by chevy

  • Gasoline in a Crash Test? WTF...

  • Little known fact. All cars in Michael Bay movies are Pintos in disguise.

  • note to self dont get a pinto as a 1st car

  • "Peppy, you little fucker, I told you not to install the flame throwers in the Pinto. Asshole."

  • Jesus! Note the fully prepared "fire crew" on scene in seconds. They had obviously heard about the nasty little Pinto by then, and were prepared. I'm sure Chicano's would love this piece of film just for the tail draggon' Impala!

  • pintos sucked it didit stand a chance getting hit by a full size car

  • Good way to get ride of some of our excess Christian Republicans.

  • i want the impala.

  • Ford then started putting rubber covers over the gas tanks...

  • @youpooper18 even rubber covers would not save you the take would open ,,:) it was not a spark from the metal from the tank meeting it was wireing in back of the car that start the fires.. if you had your tern signal on when rearend most likly sitting at a left hand tern lane or waitting to make a right ,was the cominfactor in all fire crash of the Pinto (but that was kept away from puplic with the law sute stulmint)

  • @uhfnutbar1 Ohh cool...

  • Ha, the FD was expecting it

  • And the impala drives home safely

  • the BBQ that seats 4.

  • ya pay for what ya get, motorcycles ain't the best for safety but fuck the gov regulating me from riding mine

  • I suddenly want an Impala.

  • I love how the chevy barley got dented..

  • @DizzyMan24 That's probably because the Chevy weighs 5000 pounds and the Ford weighs like 2000...

  • @DizzyMan24 I think both cars got owned in this situation.

  • thadll buff right out

  • It caused more damage to the Chevy because it went up in flames! lol

  • Chevy Impala uses ember!

    Its super effective!

  • That is one tough Impala. There's practically no damage to it!

  • Ford didn't fix the fuel tank problem because it was too expensive....

  • @BrunostNOR

    The cost of the repairs was more than the payout for lawsuits. Ford cared about profit more than public safety.

  • @CarPro1993 then we come to chrysler & the jeep cherrokee

  • @dgelevators1

    That is correct, the Grand Cherokee's fuel tank design was based upon a defective, decades-old basis. Manufacturers should've learned that having the fuel tank behind the rear axle was dangerous from the Pinto. I was an ex-owner of a '99 WJ, and I felt very uneasy stopped at intersections. If you look at the rear-end, you can easily see the fuel tank hanging slightly below the bumper.

  • @CarPro1993 hay retard all cars untill front wheel drive had the gas tank behind the rear axle

  • @uhfnutbar1

    Learn how to properly use punctuation and grammar before you call someone a retard, retard. I know that's where they were, but it's an extremely unsafe design. They should've known that then and they should know that now.

  • @CarPro1993 learn to understand your not so special just becose you got your grade 12,,, what i dout understand is you cant understand what im saying i thoght you where smart after all you can spell? and why do you care so much your not so special only 65% of americans can spell lot s drop outs,, did you know many grate men cant spell nor can read i bet you dont call them stupit? so know its my tern to call you stupit asshole just becose you dont know that ? and no i dont care what you think :)

  • @uhfnutbar1

    Well good for you buddy.

  • @CarPro1993 "Our kids drive these cars" said the CEO of Ford. I believe it.

  • @CarPro1993 The cost of repairs was actually cheaper. Ford did not think there would be that many lawsuits so in the end it would cost them less to deal with lawsuits than to pay for modifications to the car. They ended up spending more on the lawsuits than they would have if they had simply done the modifications. Look up the "Ford Pinto Memo". The cost of the modification was $11 per car. Ford estimated that it would cost them $137 million for repairs and $40 million for total lawsuits.

  • lol

  • Bad ass!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more