Darwin was a sick man toward the end of his life, and like all old geezers he had gained a lot of weaknesses. His back and knees got weak which prevented that loser atheist to walk upright. I guess he was turning into a chimp which his followers claim man share a common ancestor with. Bologna! Just bologna!
Hitler's claims of being a 'Christian', and claims of doing 'God's will', does not mean he 'follows Jesus'.
I don't think Jesus would kill all of the Jews because it was God's will (Hitler: "I am doing God's work...").
Quite the contrary. Jesus was a Jew. Jesus was condemned by other Jews. Therefore, to claim that Christianity is 'evil' because Hitler was a 'Christian' is to be ignorant of the true foundation of Christianity: Jesus Christ.
As Dawkins so aptly pointed out: For transitional fossil discovered, creationists will then say we need 2 more---the one before and the one after. Therefore, they will never make the connection. Much like working with children playing connect the dots. They just can't see the final outcome until the picture is completed.
@Purushadasa As Hitler wrote in mein Kampf: "I am convinced that I am acting as the agent of our Creator. By fighting off the Jews. I am doing the Lord's work", which he repeated in a speech in 1938.
A direct anti-semitic line can be drawn from the Gospels and Paul to the Holocaust. Christianity has been a curse on humanity.
You can't begin a discussion by calling someone opposed to you a "propagandist", and expect to be taken seriously. Also, there is no such thing as a Darwin-IST. Do you call everyone who believes in gravity a Newtonist? Subscribing to the scientific theory of evolution and natural selection is the norm, and creationism is the tiny, very loud fringe element. They are not equal sides of an ongoing debate. There is no debate. Evolution is an accepted theory, valid enough to be accepted as fact.
Denial is such a powerful force in some people's way of thinking... 4 centuries ago, he would have had the same kind of audience laughing at his "Do you really believe that the Earth is a sphere?" (While navigators had already navigated it around). Human intelligence doesn't evolve (same species), but science and knowledge do.
Absofragginlutely, plus it's just plain LOGICAL. Any reasonable scientist wouldn't dream of saying evolution is incorrect, plus it's been tweaked slightly since Darwin's time, supplemental evidence or something, I'm three weeks into my studies to be an Anthropologist.
Give me a break! Everytime we discuss evidence specifics evolutionists always claim "proof" without giving the proof. Genetic PhDs are still in heated debate, but you can catagorically announce conclusion!
ERVs are lingering remnants of failed viral infection, which occurred in an ancestor's sex cell and got propagated in its offspring. The viral insertion site is completely random and finding one in the same location in two individuals indicates they each had that same ancestor. Humans and chimps have 98,000 ERV locations in common. Common ancestor?
Actually I Understand what Philip Johnson is saying. I've read 5 of his books and more than 80 other books on evolution, ID and related topics. What I meant was, "I can't figure out how to post a comment."
The point that you are missing is that if you pick any fossil from the fossil record it is a COMPLETE SPECIES. No fossil by it self will ever be "transitional". If you have two species, one evolving from the other, and you found a fossil of the first changing into the second, that middle fossil will still be a complete species. The gradual change is indeed in the fossil record.
If evidence for macro-evolution (change from one species to another) was so abundant we should find thousands, no millions of COMPLETE SPECIES that are between prehistoric species and modern species. Point is that trivial change (pepper moth adaptation, finch beak size, bacteria changes/resistance,) within an fundementally unchanging existing species may illustrate micro-evolution but not macro-evolution.
Although this is actually quite good in its basis, I will save you forty minutes "The Weakness of Darwinism" is Darwin thought the atom and its three parts were the smallest thing in existence.Except, that isn't true. We now know there is much smaller "stuff" inside an atom.Plus, that"micro-evolution" exists-short people's ancestors lived in the north in a cave. Tall people's lived on plains. "Macro-evolution"doesn't-a person with rickets doesn't prove anything. PS.I'm not a Christian so please!
"Earth suspended in space" - this was refuted in one of the recent thunderf00t videos. it is a statement being made by Job in relation to God's magnicisance. it doesnt constitute knowldge of any kind.
lood sustains life- no shit really, this should have become appearent when people started dying from blood loss.
"Man's body made of the same materials of the earth" - No ok, just no. Genesis is at much at ends with abiogenesis as too subjects possibly can be.
I say this not to be rude, but most people have become so dumb and blind, they let other people do the thinking for them, on 1 hand they have so called science telling them what is true and whats not, on the other hand they have people telling them the bible is not true, but all this time they put their trust in man that they do not even know, rather than seeking for themselves, u wanna know if God is real, test the bible yourself, try and understand it yourself, dont be fooled by the lies...
macroevolution is the only thing science can hold onto as proof, however all this is is pre-programmed adations of the same species, which already exists in the creatures DNA, this is like saying you found a computer program that updates itself, so this is proof for computer evolution, rather than saying, this must have been programmed to update or adapt to certain programming enviroments, they use this assumption of macro to explain everything else that cannot be proved, its a ridiculous lie.
evolution is NOT science, science is something which can be 1) Theorised 2) tested 3) observed.
Evolution passes 1) with flying colors, it sure can be theorised, and become feasable in someones mind, but that is where it stays, it is only real inside a persons head, it has NOT being tested or observed to a level where anyone can say with any certainty that it is even posible let alone true, but of course you religious evolutionists will defend this cus you like the idea of no accountability...
Here is the problem, even if God was to show himself to these people who are "willfully ignorant" they will come up with some other explanation to get out of the idea of a God, its not that you people dont believe in God, rather you do not want to believe, as the scripture says you are willfully ignorant and prefer to live in darkness, and fear the light, lest your deeds and heart be exposed, God CAN fix this if you put your trust in him however, rather than falible athiestic ignorant scientists
Evolution is a religion, is budhism a religion? budhists do not worship a God... evolution is an assumption built on an assumption, with observed macro evolution used to backup its extraordinary belief system, it requires more faith to believe we came from a rock, than an intelligent designer, evolution puts in faith in fallible man, Christianity puts its faith in infalible God, backed up by over 80% of its prophetic words coming true to this day, esp with regards to the willfully ignorant...
"Let me ask you a question, since you are an atheist: you only accept as truth those things that are proven to you, right? "
Well, it really depends. Sometimes two alternatives are offered. One of them is reasonable, the other completely outlandish. I'm much more likely to take the more reasonable path.
The point here, though, is that we aren't talking at all about the existence of god. Just about biblical creationism which is absolute hogwash, prima facie.
Atheism, and any other Religion is designed for people to stop being Critical thinkers. The fact is I don't know if their is a god or not. Religion states there has to be a god! Atheism says There is no God! That's whats wrong with all of this. We just don't know. And not enough people don't know we don't know. I am neither a part of any religion or an Atheism. That doesn't mean you shouldn't read the bible, and the kuran, and the Orgins of species. Read them all!
wow by saying that you show just how ill informed and foolish you are. at least learn a little more about darwinism before saying something like that, many scientists are going back to creationism and abandoning evolution, do a little research before speaking again at something you know little about
'many scientists are going back to creationism and abandoning evolution'
non of them are biologists/zoologists/geneticists or anything related to evolutionry theory, most of them are nutritioniists ect:/ so their opinion on evolution is invalid.
99.9 percent support darwinism, yeah ok, creationism is in the minority among scientists but, every scientist a hundred years ago thought the eartyh was flat. i dont know what survey your are talkin about
actually, most people thought the earth was flat because of the bible and most science back then was based around the bible (note it was until science left that idiocy behind and actually started TESTING idea's that we got anywhere)
no one who had looked at the evidence, lived in a desert or sailed alot thought the earth was flat.
Isaiah 40:22 is either claiming that the Earth is a flat circle or that has a flat circle above it. it was never really established that the earth is a sphere.
Don't wish to dispute ya mate, nor appear closed-minded, but all 'The ends of..', 'Pillars...' and 'Four corners...' are euphemisms, and are often used today, even outside of religion
There's no 'flat earth society' (if I may), in The Bible.
And thus your argument in favor of biblical creationism vanishes with a weak little "pop."
Your lack argumentative skills. Besides, don't you know that MOST of the branches of science were founded by the wisdom of believers? Your religion (evolution) is a religion for empty-headed folks who are trying desperately to avoid an impending judgment. Try as you might, but there is no escaping.
"Evolution is not a religion. For one thing, it doesn't promote the worship of a god."
Grow up, kid. Are five year-olds allowed on here? I think you should go and ask mommy ape permission to be on here. My apologies to all the five-year-olds out there, ALL of whom, I am sure, are more mature that this imbecile.
"Oh thats right I am an athiest - thank fuck for that"
Do me a favor, lying atheist, try taking an elementary class in common courtesy, on simply common decency and manners. Oh, I forgot, you are a modified ape, so you have an excuse. Also, your brain did not finish evolving yet. Clean up your filth and learn some manners, if not don't respond to my posts.
Courtesy is not necessary in your case, seeing as you have your invisible friend who will make it all right. Not that he is doing much good for you right now. Touched a nerve did I? Well then suck it up bible basher and try again.
You're so right. The Bible says the lost will be ashes under the soles of the feet of the saved. I have hope. All you have is the promise that one day flowers will grow and bloom because they draw nutrients from your dead hide and you'll be food for worms. You are deluded and pathetic. You're even dumber than that b/c u don't even know that Dawkins, your priest, is legally bound to preach his crap, even if he doesn't believe it.
Bill Hamilton said it beautifully in his will when he asked for his body to be lain in the forest protected from mammals and birds to allow the beetles he studied all his life to use his body as food for their young. I will be born, beetle by flying beetle, out into the Brazilian wilderness beneath the stars. Your threats dont work on those who dont suffer the same superstitions as you.
Wow... Darwin's theory of natural selection was so insidious that 100 years after its publication, American feminists led a sexual revolution. Perfect logic.
This is what happens when you have a lawyer trying to disprove biological theory.
warriorprince1010, are you serious about science and creation? Humanism and the "Rotting Corpse of Christianity" - h t t p://w w w dot youtube dot com/watch?v=iG-9hciNvyw
So darwin inspired Hitler. You guys do realise that god kills jews at a pretty terrific rate. Also god solves problems by killing people (eg the flood). Hitler was roman catholic.
Well, to be literal, the terms "satin" and "hell" meant, before the bible, nothing more than the bad guys, if you will, and where they lived. So technically satin's body count would be infinite, and nothing at the same time, since the term is so relative.
Danmill23, Hitler and Evolution - w w w dot warneveryone dot com/hitler_evolution dot htm. God also sent his son to die for the sins of mankind and now he provides the free gift of salvation through Jesus Christ. (God is going to kill 200,000,000 in the future.) Are you ready to face his warth?
@BereanBeacon Guidelines from Der Bucherie 2:6 (1935), P279
No.6 Writings of a philosophical and social nature whose content deals with the false scientific enlightenment of primitive Darwinism and Monism (H�ckel).
6. Schriften weltanschaulichen und lebenskundlichen Charakters, deren Inhalt die falsche naturwissenschaftliche Aufkl�rung eines primitiven Darwinismus und Monismus ist (H�ckel).
hitler was no catholic, nor was he christian at al,. he was trying to restore german paganism and he despised traditional christianity. Corrie Tenboom was Christian - she ended up in a concentration camp just for being and acting as christian teaching prescribes.
Easy to say hitler was no catholic or no christian. Easy to say.
Let's do an example
Does Hitler speak of the divinity of arian blood as the highest of GODS creation in "Mien Kampf" or does he claim arians have the same blood as monkies?
@Danmill23 Um Yes Hitler refered to God & creation that does NOT mean He believed in the New Testament or the teachings of Jesus. as a matter of fact he despised the new testament. PAGANS beleived in Gods and a creator or creators too. Hitler sometimes used Christian terminology to decieve the public but he was NO Christian. There is plenty of documentation that he was intent on restoring German Paganism- Diviniity of arian blood is NOT a christian concept anywhere.
Do you define the characteristics that make a person a christian?
In Mein Kampf, he states, "Therefore, I am convinced that I am acting as the agent of our Creator. By fighting off the Jews, I am doing the Lord's work."
Again, in a Nazi Christmas celebration in 1926, Hitler stated: "Christ was the greatest early fighter in the battle against the world enemy, the Jews. The work that Christ started but could not finish, I--Adolf Hitler--will conclude."
In a Reichstag speech in 1938, Hitler again confirmed the religious origins of his crusade, "I believe today that I am acting in the sense of the Almighty Creator. By warding off the Jews, I am fighting for the Lord's work." He was a Catholic until his death.
I'll give you a choice. Which would you say he was CLOSEST to an ...
@Danmill23@Danmill23 go to triple w(dot)doxa(dot)ws/social/Hitler(dot)h t m l & read- the site explains some of hitlers christian sounding statemnts which were meant for the public & shows his private staments such as:"National Socialism and religion cannot exist together....The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity..." from The book Hitler's Secret Conversations 1941-1944 published by Farrar, Straus & Young, Inc.first edition, 1953 theres much more - go read!
@EquineDreams Ok had a quick look. Alright then let's say he hated christianity, even say he was not a christian. Again actions speak louder than words.
The anti-semitic roots in Germany we're deep and religiously based. - I think you'll agree.
Did this affect Hitlers choices? In the documents provided he seemed to hate homosexuals. Where did he get that idea from? Why did he get married before he killed him self? ...
BereanBeacon you need to promote your videos by tried and true YouTube means to reach a larger audience,post a small video response to most discussed vids,most viewed,and friend invites,spread the word,these are great educational videos for a lost and dying generation.God bless,
click your user name,then at the top left to the right of the YouTube logo it reads:videos categories etc.,they are links to the most discussed,rated,viewed etc. by date,month,year,all time
There are also channels or groups that discuss certain topics
Dawkins thinks humans and lobsters share a common ancestry? Really? OMG hahahahah! What an idiot. hahah! Stupid Atheists.
Entropy56 10 hours ago
Dawkins is a fraud. Darwinism = religion.
Entropy56 10 hours ago
Darwin was a sick man toward the end of his life, and like all old geezers he had gained a lot of weaknesses. His back and knees got weak which prevented that loser atheist to walk upright. I guess he was turning into a chimp which his followers claim man share a common ancestor with. Bologna! Just bologna!
GeRzAwN 7 months ago
Hitler's claims of being a 'Christian', and claims of doing 'God's will', does not mean he 'follows Jesus'.
I don't think Jesus would kill all of the Jews because it was God's will (Hitler: "I am doing God's work...").
Quite the contrary. Jesus was a Jew. Jesus was condemned by other Jews. Therefore, to claim that Christianity is 'evil' because Hitler was a 'Christian' is to be ignorant of the true foundation of Christianity: Jesus Christ.
The 'Hitler argument' is invalid.
YouMadButISwag 9 months ago
This guy has already lied 2:30 in. Why would I listen to this.
ImperialUSA 11 months ago
As Dawkins so aptly pointed out: For transitional fossil discovered, creationists will then say we need 2 more---the one before and the one after. Therefore, they will never make the connection. Much like working with children playing connect the dots. They just can't see the final outcome until the picture is completed.
HisTruthbeUNKOWN 1 year ago
Brilliant video, and all true. Thanks for uploading!
Purushadasa 1 year ago
@Purushadasa Thank you for your comment to me - it's priceless.
dbes02 1 year ago
@Purushadasa As Hitler wrote in mein Kampf: "I am convinced that I am acting as the agent of our Creator. By fighting off the Jews. I am doing the Lord's work", which he repeated in a speech in 1938.
A direct anti-semitic line can be drawn from the Gospels and Paul to the Holocaust. Christianity has been a curse on humanity.
dbes02 1 year ago
Comment removed
Purushadasa 1 year ago
You can't begin a discussion by calling someone opposed to you a "propagandist", and expect to be taken seriously. Also, there is no such thing as a Darwin-IST. Do you call everyone who believes in gravity a Newtonist? Subscribing to the scientific theory of evolution and natural selection is the norm, and creationism is the tiny, very loud fringe element. They are not equal sides of an ongoing debate. There is no debate. Evolution is an accepted theory, valid enough to be accepted as fact.
AceSkepTik 1 year ago
"Don't eat me, I'm your cousin 2 million times removed" said the lobster to the fisherman.
Khamomil 1 year ago
Denial is such a powerful force in some people's way of thinking... 4 centuries ago, he would have had the same kind of audience laughing at his "Do you really believe that the Earth is a sphere?" (While navigators had already navigated it around). Human intelligence doesn't evolve (same species), but science and knowledge do.
wollin20 2 years ago
Why is he trying to show scientist are anti-christian, they are not. 70% accept God.
Natural selection is the mechenism as per Dawinininism. [which is 150 years old and out of date]
gregrutz 2 years ago
I still can't figure this out
gussetma1945 2 years ago
He is pointing out that ancestry is a given. What remains to be established is the evidence for macro-evolution (change from one species to another).
Lookin4TruthDotCom 2 years ago
Evolution has been proven.
DNA proves it,
gregrutz 2 years ago
Absofragginlutely, plus it's just plain LOGICAL. Any reasonable scientist wouldn't dream of saying evolution is incorrect, plus it's been tweaked slightly since Darwin's time, supplemental evidence or something, I'm three weeks into my studies to be an Anthropologist.
NerdyCanadian 2 years ago
Give me a break! Everytime we discuss evidence specifics evolutionists always claim "proof" without giving the proof. Genetic PhDs are still in heated debate, but you can catagorically announce conclusion!
Lookin4TruthDotCom 2 years ago 6
ERVs are lingering remnants of failed viral infection, which occurred in an ancestor's sex cell and got propagated in its offspring. The viral insertion site is completely random and finding one in the same location in two individuals indicates they each had that same ancestor. Humans and chimps have 98,000 ERV locations in common. Common ancestor?
gregrutz 2 years ago
@Lookin4TruthDotCom They really really aren't
TheGamanic 11 months ago
search transitional fossils 1 NEW
by donexodus2
for the evidence you can't seem to find.
gregrutz 2 years ago
Don't forget that for each transitional fossil found there are 2 new missing, one on each side.
heloizyjhenifer 2 years ago
Good thing we don't need all the fossils to prove evolution happened.
DNA proves it.
gregrutz 2 years ago
Actually I Understand what Philip Johnson is saying. I've read 5 of his books and more than 80 other books on evolution, ID and related topics. What I meant was, "I can't figure out how to post a comment."
gussetma1945 2 years ago
Ban Christianity.
NerdyCanadian 2 years ago
About the horse......
The point that you are missing is that if you pick any fossil from the fossil record it is a COMPLETE SPECIES. No fossil by it self will ever be "transitional". If you have two species, one evolving from the other, and you found a fossil of the first changing into the second, that middle fossil will still be a complete species. The gradual change is indeed in the fossil record.
gregrutz 2 years ago
If evidence for macro-evolution (change from one species to another) was so abundant we should find thousands, no millions of COMPLETE SPECIES that are between prehistoric species and modern species. Point is that trivial change (pepper moth adaptation, finch beak size, bacteria changes/resistance,) within an fundementally unchanging existing species may illustrate micro-evolution but not macro-evolution.
Lookin4TruthDotCom 2 years ago
99% of complete species that ever lived on the earth are extinct. They are all between prehistoric species and modern species.
Dinosaurs lived and changed [evolved] for 180 million years. They came after Cambrian species and before modern species. They evolved into birds.
Is that so hard to understand?
gregrutz 2 years ago
Blame the atheists,
and the geologist who say the world is old,
and the biologist who say evolution happened.
and the fossils,
and the DNA
Common ancestory IS evolution, Darwinism is his reason WHY it happened.
gregrutz 2 years ago
Although this is actually quite good in its basis, I will save you forty minutes "The Weakness of Darwinism" is Darwin thought the atom and its three parts were the smallest thing in existence.Except, that isn't true. We now know there is much smaller "stuff" inside an atom.Plus, that"micro-evolution" exists-short people's ancestors lived in the north in a cave. Tall people's lived on plains. "Macro-evolution"doesn't-a person with rickets doesn't prove anything. PS.I'm not a Christian so please!
jayjohnson56 2 years ago
yawn, same old bullshit.
"Earth suspended in space" - this was refuted in one of the recent thunderf00t videos. it is a statement being made by Job in relation to God's magnicisance. it doesnt constitute knowldge of any kind.
lood sustains life- no shit really, this should have become appearent when people started dying from blood loss.
"Man's body made of the same materials of the earth" - No ok, just no. Genesis is at much at ends with abiogenesis as too subjects possibly can be.
types10001 3 years ago
Psalms 8:8?...how?
types10001 3 years ago
I say this not to be rude, but most people have become so dumb and blind, they let other people do the thinking for them, on 1 hand they have so called science telling them what is true and whats not, on the other hand they have people telling them the bible is not true, but all this time they put their trust in man that they do not even know, rather than seeking for themselves, u wanna know if God is real, test the bible yourself, try and understand it yourself, dont be fooled by the lies...
SewingGoodSeeds 3 years ago
macroevolution is the only thing science can hold onto as proof, however all this is is pre-programmed adations of the same species, which already exists in the creatures DNA, this is like saying you found a computer program that updates itself, so this is proof for computer evolution, rather than saying, this must have been programmed to update or adapt to certain programming enviroments, they use this assumption of macro to explain everything else that cannot be proved, its a ridiculous lie.
SewingGoodSeeds 3 years ago
evolution is NOT science, science is something which can be 1) Theorised 2) tested 3) observed.
Evolution passes 1) with flying colors, it sure can be theorised, and become feasable in someones mind, but that is where it stays, it is only real inside a persons head, it has NOT being tested or observed to a level where anyone can say with any certainty that it is even posible let alone true, but of course you religious evolutionists will defend this cus you like the idea of no accountability...
SewingGoodSeeds 3 years ago
Here is the problem, even if God was to show himself to these people who are "willfully ignorant" they will come up with some other explanation to get out of the idea of a God, its not that you people dont believe in God, rather you do not want to believe, as the scripture says you are willfully ignorant and prefer to live in darkness, and fear the light, lest your deeds and heart be exposed, God CAN fix this if you put your trust in him however, rather than falible athiestic ignorant scientists
SewingGoodSeeds 3 years ago
Evolution is a religion, is budhism a religion? budhists do not worship a God... evolution is an assumption built on an assumption, with observed macro evolution used to backup its extraordinary belief system, it requires more faith to believe we came from a rock, than an intelligent designer, evolution puts in faith in fallible man, Christianity puts its faith in infalible God, backed up by over 80% of its prophetic words coming true to this day, esp with regards to the willfully ignorant...
SewingGoodSeeds 3 years ago
Nice straw man. I like the statistic too, nice tough.
Rhineville 2 years ago
"Let me ask you a question, since you are an atheist: you only accept as truth those things that are proven to you, right? "
Well, it really depends. Sometimes two alternatives are offered. One of them is reasonable, the other completely outlandish. I'm much more likely to take the more reasonable path.
The point here, though, is that we aren't talking at all about the existence of god. Just about biblical creationism which is absolute hogwash, prima facie.
carcosa 3 years ago
Your "evidence" one suspect paper article from butfuck USA written in 1980. Way to go twat excuse me for not being impressed.
myrmecia1977 3 years ago
Is there a part two to this?
tamarind777 3 years ago
News flash: Darwinism is still just a theory.
And that's a fact!
nowaterforhim 3 years ago
a theory is an explanation built around observational evidence and experiments.
Erech01 3 years ago
Atheism, and any other Religion is designed for people to stop being Critical thinkers. The fact is I don't know if their is a god or not. Religion states there has to be a god! Atheism says There is no God! That's whats wrong with all of this. We just don't know. And not enough people don't know we don't know. I am neither a part of any religion or an Atheism. That doesn't mean you shouldn't read the bible, and the kuran, and the Orgins of species. Read them all!
Ryuzzakii 3 years ago
Agnostic?
willowbud 3 years ago
'Atheism, and any other Religion is designed for people to stop being Critical thinkers'
atheism is asmuch a religion as being bald is a hair colour.
Erech01 3 years ago
A logical and cogent presentation of a systematically censored and intelligent point of view. This is the story that PBS doesn't tell.
59arkady 4 years ago 4
there s no weakness in darwins theory:? its been around for 150 years! and in that time not one peice of evidence has been presented to counter it.
P.S. dawkins is probably the world leading Biologist, and yes he's an atheist, what does it mean, 0, im an atheist, what does in mean, 0.
Erech01 4 years ago
wow by saying that you show just how ill informed and foolish you are. at least learn a little more about darwinism before saying something like that, many scientists are going back to creationism and abandoning evolution, do a little research before speaking again at something you know little about
huskernation60 3 years ago
'at least learn a little more about darwinism before saying something like that'
1. there is no such thing as 'darwinism' in the scientific community
2. 99.9% of the scientific community support evolution, survey after survey confirms this.
YOU do research before making claims, i get most of my info on evolution from the centre for life, a genetic research centre near where i live.
Erech01 3 years ago
P.S.
'many scientists are going back to creationism and abandoning evolution'
non of them are biologists/zoologists/geneticists or anything related to evolutionry theory, most of them are nutritioniists ect:/ so their opinion on evolution is invalid.
Erech01 3 years ago
99.9 percent support darwinism, yeah ok, creationism is in the minority among scientists but, every scientist a hundred years ago thought the eartyh was flat. i dont know what survey your are talkin about
huskernation60 3 years ago
look them up.
Erech01 3 years ago
actually, most people thought the earth was flat because of the bible and most science back then was based around the bible (note it was until science left that idiocy behind and actually started TESTING idea's that we got anywhere)
no one who had looked at the evidence, lived in a desert or sailed alot thought the earth was flat.
Erech01 3 years ago
I'm a little rusty, but where does it say in The Bible the world is flat?
scotstownque 3 years ago
just different refences to the state of the earth i.e. it stands of pillars, its a circle ect.
Erech01 3 years ago
Uh...Okey Doke....
scotstownque 3 years ago
It doesn't. That was an ignorant comment. Plenty of them on these threads. People will discredit The Bible every chance they get.
nowaterforhim 3 years ago
but it does say that...are you saying it doesnt?
types10001 3 years ago
I'm saying I don't recall which verse says the world is flat. If one does, pass it on to me...
Thank-You in advance, and Happy New Year.
scotstownque 3 years ago
earth having 'Corners' and 'ends':
Isaiah 11:12
Revelation 7:1
Job 38:13
Daniel 4:11
Earth on pillars:
Job 9:6
Isaiah 40:22 is either claiming that the Earth is a flat circle or that has a flat circle above it. it was never really established that the earth is a sphere.
types10001 3 years ago
Don't wish to dispute ya mate, nor appear closed-minded, but all 'The ends of..', 'Pillars...' and 'Four corners...' are euphemisms, and are often used today, even outside of religion
There's no 'flat earth society' (if I may), in The Bible.
Cheers, & have a nice week-end. :)
babajii321 3 years ago
"99.9% of the scientific community support evolution, survey after survey confirms this..."
Science is NOT conducted by a show of hands. It makes no difference what the majority does, it's what the evidence supports that matters.
tamarind777 3 years ago
'it's what the evidence supports that matters. '
and the evidence supports evolutionry theory, thats why the scientific community support it overwhelmingly.
Erech01 3 years ago
"Science is NOT conducted by a show of hands. It makes no difference what the majority does, it's what the evidence supports that matters."
And thus your argument in favor of biblical creationism vanishes with a weak little "pop."
carcosa 3 years ago
And thus your argument in favor of biblical creationism vanishes with a weak little "pop."
Your lack argumentative skills. Besides, don't you know that MOST of the branches of science were founded by the wisdom of believers? Your religion (evolution) is a religion for empty-headed folks who are trying desperately to avoid an impending judgment. Try as you might, but there is no escaping.
tamarind777 3 years ago
I laugh in the face of your nonexistent god.
Evolution is not a religion. For one thing, it doesn't promote the worship of a god, dumbfuck.
I think you know that we're descended from chimps. After all, you see one every time you look in the mirror.
Don't you?
carcosa 3 years ago
"Evolution is not a religion. For one thing, it doesn't promote the worship of a god."
Grow up, kid. Are five year-olds allowed on here? I think you should go and ask mommy ape permission to be on here. My apologies to all the five-year-olds out there, ALL of whom, I am sure, are more mature that this imbecile.
tamarind777 3 years ago
What we have here, friends, is a chimpout.
carcosa 3 years ago
"What we have here, friends, is a chimpout."
Let me ask you a question, since you are an atheist: you only accept as truth those things that are proven to you, right?
tamarind777 3 years ago
Delusional as well as fucking stupid tamarind you make me ashamed to be a christian.... Oh thats right I am an athiest - thank fuck for that
myrmecia1977 3 years ago
"Oh thats right I am an athiest - thank fuck for that"
Do me a favor, lying atheist, try taking an elementary class in common courtesy, on simply common decency and manners. Oh, I forgot, you are a modified ape, so you have an excuse. Also, your brain did not finish evolving yet. Clean up your filth and learn some manners, if not don't respond to my posts.
tamarind777 3 years ago
Courtesy is not necessary in your case, seeing as you have your invisible friend who will make it all right. Not that he is doing much good for you right now. Touched a nerve did I? Well then suck it up bible basher and try again.
myrmecia1977 3 years ago
"...invisible friend."
You're so right. The Bible says the lost will be ashes under the soles of the feet of the saved. I have hope. All you have is the promise that one day flowers will grow and bloom because they draw nutrients from your dead hide and you'll be food for worms. You are deluded and pathetic. You're even dumber than that b/c u don't even know that Dawkins, your priest, is legally bound to preach his crap, even if he doesn't believe it.
tamarind777 3 years ago
"The Bible says the lost will be ashes under the soles of the feet of the saved."
The bible and all its hatespeech is what will be ashes.
carcosa 3 years ago
Bill Hamilton said it beautifully in his will when he asked for his body to be lain in the forest protected from mammals and birds to allow the beetles he studied all his life to use his body as food for their young. I will be born, beetle by flying beetle, out into the Brazilian wilderness beneath the stars. Your threats dont work on those who dont suffer the same superstitions as you.
myrmecia1977 3 years ago
"I will be born, beetle by flying beetle, out into the Brazilian wilderness beneath the stars."
Yes, absolutely. Religion is sad pathetic fear and false hope for nothing.
carcosa 3 years ago
Wow... Darwin's theory of natural selection was so insidious that 100 years after its publication, American feminists led a sexual revolution. Perfect logic.
This is what happens when you have a lawyer trying to disprove biological theory.
dorsk188 4 years ago 2
Hitler was not a darwinist, he was roman cathilic that perverted darwin ideals
Darwin: "survival of species that can adapt to their changing enviornment"
Hitler: "survival of the strongest"
Amercian idiot: "survival of the fitest"
godscuttingyoudown 4 years ago 2
typical religious argument
1. provide no evidence
2. attack the oposition with jokes
3. make youre self into a victim
4. make the opposition evil with sinister motives.
godscuttingyoudown 4 years ago 2
Creation has been accepted by science. I wish we would move on and talk about how God designed everything and how sadly imperfection set in.
warriorprince1010 4 years ago
warriorprince1010, are you serious about science and creation? Humanism and the "Rotting Corpse of Christianity" - h t t p://w w w dot youtube dot com/watch?v=iG-9hciNvyw
BereanBeacon 4 years ago
So darwin inspired Hitler. You guys do realise that god kills jews at a pretty terrific rate. Also god solves problems by killing people (eg the flood). Hitler was roman catholic.
Danmill23 4 years ago
To add to that, in the bible, satin's body count was something near 11. God's was in the millions.
Crimsonpie 4 years ago
So true. It would appear the Satan "tricked" god into killing Jobs family and servants. Also by my estimation Satant has killed no-one?
Danmill23 4 years ago
Well, to be literal, the terms "satin" and "hell" meant, before the bible, nothing more than the bad guys, if you will, and where they lived. So technically satin's body count would be infinite, and nothing at the same time, since the term is so relative.
Crimsonpie 4 years ago
Danmill23, Hitler and Evolution - w w w dot warneveryone dot com/hitler_evolution dot htm. God also sent his son to die for the sins of mankind and now he provides the free gift of salvation through Jesus Christ. (God is going to kill 200,000,000 in the future.) Are you ready to face his warth?
BereanBeacon 4 years ago
im 100% ready to face is warth:P whatever a warth is:P
Erech01 4 years ago 2
Wow, where did you pull that figure from? btw, if you see god anytime soon, tell him to BRING IT ON
purerizzo 4 years ago
"btw, if you see god anytime soon, tell him to BRING IT ON"
Don't worry, just wait. One day you WILL see God, but unless you lose your hubris, pride, and ignorance you will be sorry on that day.
tamarind777 3 years ago
@BereanBeacon Guidelines from Der Bucherie 2:6 (1935), P279
No.6 Writings of a philosophical and social nature whose content deals with the false scientific enlightenment of primitive Darwinism and Monism (H�ckel).
6. Schriften weltanschaulichen und lebenskundlichen Charakters, deren Inhalt die falsche naturwissenschaftliche Aufkl�rung eines primitiven Darwinismus und Monismus ist (H�ckel).
gamesbok 1 year ago
@Danmill23
hitler was no catholic, nor was he christian at al,. he was trying to restore german paganism and he despised traditional christianity. Corrie Tenboom was Christian - she ended up in a concentration camp just for being and acting as christian teaching prescribes.
EquineDreams 1 year ago
@EquineDreams
Easy to say hitler was no catholic or no christian. Easy to say.
Let's do an example
Does Hitler speak of the divinity of arian blood as the highest of GODS creation in "Mien Kampf" or does he claim arians have the same blood as monkies?
If you don't know what do you guess?
Danmill23 1 year ago
@Danmill23 Um Yes Hitler refered to God & creation that does NOT mean He believed in the New Testament or the teachings of Jesus. as a matter of fact he despised the new testament. PAGANS beleived in Gods and a creator or creators too. Hitler sometimes used Christian terminology to decieve the public but he was NO Christian. There is plenty of documentation that he was intent on restoring German Paganism- Diviniity of arian blood is NOT a christian concept anywhere.
EquineDreams 1 year ago
@EquineDreams
Do you define the characteristics that make a person a christian?
In Mein Kampf, he states, "Therefore, I am convinced that I am acting as the agent of our Creator. By fighting off the Jews, I am doing the Lord's work."
Again, in a Nazi Christmas celebration in 1926, Hitler stated: "Christ was the greatest early fighter in the battle against the world enemy, the Jews. The work that Christ started but could not finish, I--Adolf Hitler--will conclude."
continued ...
Danmill23 1 year ago
continued ...
In a Reichstag speech in 1938, Hitler again confirmed the religious origins of his crusade, "I believe today that I am acting in the sense of the Almighty Creator. By warding off the Jews, I am fighting for the Lord's work." He was a Catholic until his death.
I'll give you a choice. Which would you say he was CLOSEST to an ...
1) Atheist
2) Muslim
3) Christian
Danmill23 1 year ago
@Danmill23 @Danmill23 go to triple w(dot)doxa(dot)ws/social/Hitler(dot)h t m l & read- the site explains some of hitlers christian sounding statemnts which were meant for the public & shows his private staments such as:"National Socialism and religion cannot exist together....The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity..." from The book Hitler's Secret Conversations 1941-1944 published by Farrar, Straus & Young, Inc.first edition, 1953 theres much more - go read!
EquineDreams 1 year ago
@EquineDreams Ok had a quick look. Alright then let's say he hated christianity, even say he was not a christian. Again actions speak louder than words.
The anti-semitic roots in Germany we're deep and religiously based. - I think you'll agree.
Did this affect Hitlers choices? In the documents provided he seemed to hate homosexuals. Where did he get that idea from? Why did he get married before he killed him self? ...
Danmill23 1 year ago
BereanBeacon you need to promote your videos by tried and true YouTube means to reach a larger audience,post a small video response to most discussed vids,most viewed,and friend invites,spread the word,these are great educational videos for a lost and dying generation.God bless,
dingorex 4 years ago
dingorex, thank you for the advice. Where do I go to do this? "discussed vids,most viewed"
BereanBeacon 4 years ago
click your user name,then at the top left to the right of the YouTube logo it reads:videos categories etc.,they are links to the most discussed,rated,viewed etc. by date,month,year,all time
There are also channels or groups that discuss certain topics
dingorex 4 years ago
dingotex, thankyou.
BereanBeacon 4 years ago