I shouldn't say "wasn't at all" religious. He went to church. That's as far as it went. I tried to post this before: Mike Deaver used to call the social conservative votes "easy votes" or "dumb votes." The idea was to spout rhetoric, deliver on a couple of promises and capture that entire middle American block. By the way, I was certainly more pro-life and religious than Reagan and I wasn't in favor of it bringing in the nut jobs. I was in the foreign service, so my opinions were irrelevant.
I'm FAR more pro-life and religious than Ron Reagan was. He was a Presbyterian and believed in God, but it was never much of a topic. I believe he had great faith in his way. As far as social issues, the primary goal was to leverage certain positions to get votes. Mike Deaver used to call social conservative votes "easy votes" or "dumb votes." The idea was that you could capture the middle American zeitgeist in such a way that these people wouldn't even think twice about voting for anyone else.
A political sidebar: In fact, Ronald Reagan's politics WAS Goldwater politics. Same goals. Shrinking government and fighting communism. You know that Ron Reagan wasn't at religious and didn't give a crap about the pro-life cause? That was merely a show on behalf of the social conservatives he was courting. It's comical to hear people talk about being a "Reagan Republican" when they don't even know what the hell the man stood for. I admired him. He BELIEVED what he said, unlike these idiots today
"Liberal." I once ran a state campaign for Barry Goldwater. [Then again, by the time he died, "Mr. Conservative" was considered a liberal by the party. The man who codified conservative philosophy!] So put that in your pipe and smoke it, you little bastard! No, I'm not attacking the message; you're right. I'm attacking the presentation of THE TRUTH. My point had nothing to do with his impressive resume. He's presented as an unbiased party, yet he has an ax to grind the size of Paul Bunyan's.
His findings are what they are, you may not like it and believe that children should be killed for casual reasons. Reasons like, "I cant go to a concet', or "I wont be able to play sports" are casual reasons for killing a child. Just admit it, you are in favor of killing children for any reason at all, you sick son of a bitch!
I never said that, now, damnit. I don't know who you are, but if you were standing here in front of me, I'd wring your damn neck, even at my age. No, I do not favor abortion. You must be some kind of mental defective. When did I say that? Can you show me when I said that? I said that this McHugh is biased. Period. Anytime some fool decides to present an "unbiased expert" like this, it makes those who endorse it look like a pack of braying jackasses. I wrote you a personal message, you brat.
Your threats dont impress me, only makes me feel sorry for you. By trying to smear Dr. McHugh without rebutting his argument tells me and everyone else that you cant dispute his facts and you are defending this monster Tiller. What Tiller did was inexcusable and he should have lost his practice. There is a reason Goldwater did not beat Johnson, and Reagan enjoyed two landslides of historic purportions, but you RINO's will never get it. KILLING CHILDREN FOR CASUAL REASONS IS WRONG!
McHugh is the adviser to the Vatican on sexual matters. You can read up on him on the web. ARDENT opponent of abortion. He's not an impartial scientist, as purported by this vid clip.
With a resume like his,(it took over a minute and half to list all of his accomplishments) I am sure that he has advised many people and groups in all sorts of matters. Typical liberal though, attack the messenger, instead of the message
Also: I believe in 2nd amendment rights and there are quite a few people I'd like to shoot for various reasons, but I don't. You know why? Because I'm not a goddamn criminal. I leave punishment to the state and to God. I'm not going to sit here and justify what Tiller did. But as I said in my last message (read below), I can't stand it when liberals and conservatives preach THE TRUTH. Whose business is the truth? Scientists have worldviews just like anyone, and his is opinion backed with facts.
I shouldn't say "wasn't at all" religious. He went to church. That's as far as it went. I tried to post this before: Mike Deaver used to call the social conservative votes "easy votes" or "dumb votes." The idea was to spout rhetoric, deliver on a couple of promises and capture that entire middle American block. By the way, I was certainly more pro-life and religious than Reagan and I wasn't in favor of it bringing in the nut jobs. I was in the foreign service, so my opinions were irrelevant.
sc0ner 2 years ago
I'm FAR more pro-life and religious than Ron Reagan was. He was a Presbyterian and believed in God, but it was never much of a topic. I believe he had great faith in his way. As far as social issues, the primary goal was to leverage certain positions to get votes. Mike Deaver used to call social conservative votes "easy votes" or "dumb votes." The idea was that you could capture the middle American zeitgeist in such a way that these people wouldn't even think twice about voting for anyone else.
sc0ner 2 years ago
Comment removed
sc0ner 2 years ago
A political sidebar: In fact, Ronald Reagan's politics WAS Goldwater politics. Same goals. Shrinking government and fighting communism. You know that Ron Reagan wasn't at religious and didn't give a crap about the pro-life cause? That was merely a show on behalf of the social conservatives he was courting. It's comical to hear people talk about being a "Reagan Republican" when they don't even know what the hell the man stood for. I admired him. He BELIEVED what he said, unlike these idiots today
sc0ner 2 years ago
"Liberal." I once ran a state campaign for Barry Goldwater. [Then again, by the time he died, "Mr. Conservative" was considered a liberal by the party. The man who codified conservative philosophy!] So put that in your pipe and smoke it, you little bastard! No, I'm not attacking the message; you're right. I'm attacking the presentation of THE TRUTH. My point had nothing to do with his impressive resume. He's presented as an unbiased party, yet he has an ax to grind the size of Paul Bunyan's.
sc0ner 2 years ago
His findings are what they are, you may not like it and believe that children should be killed for casual reasons. Reasons like, "I cant go to a concet', or "I wont be able to play sports" are casual reasons for killing a child. Just admit it, you are in favor of killing children for any reason at all, you sick son of a bitch!
bluegsp 2 years ago
I never said that, now, damnit. I don't know who you are, but if you were standing here in front of me, I'd wring your damn neck, even at my age. No, I do not favor abortion. You must be some kind of mental defective. When did I say that? Can you show me when I said that? I said that this McHugh is biased. Period. Anytime some fool decides to present an "unbiased expert" like this, it makes those who endorse it look like a pack of braying jackasses. I wrote you a personal message, you brat.
sc0ner 2 years ago
Your threats dont impress me, only makes me feel sorry for you. By trying to smear Dr. McHugh without rebutting his argument tells me and everyone else that you cant dispute his facts and you are defending this monster Tiller. What Tiller did was inexcusable and he should have lost his practice. There is a reason Goldwater did not beat Johnson, and Reagan enjoyed two landslides of historic purportions, but you RINO's will never get it. KILLING CHILDREN FOR CASUAL REASONS IS WRONG!
bluegsp 2 years ago
Chicken, egg, chicken, egg, chicken, egg, chicken, egg.
makstad 2 years ago
I'm not sure if this posted before.
McHugh is the adviser to the Vatican on sexual matters. You can read up on him on the web. ARDENT opponent of abortion. He's not an impartial scientist, as purported by this vid clip.
sc0ner 2 years ago
With a resume like his,(it took over a minute and half to list all of his accomplishments) I am sure that he has advised many people and groups in all sorts of matters. Typical liberal though, attack the messenger, instead of the message
bluegsp 2 years ago
Also: I believe in 2nd amendment rights and there are quite a few people I'd like to shoot for various reasons, but I don't. You know why? Because I'm not a goddamn criminal. I leave punishment to the state and to God. I'm not going to sit here and justify what Tiller did. But as I said in my last message (read below), I can't stand it when liberals and conservatives preach THE TRUTH. Whose business is the truth? Scientists have worldviews just like anyone, and his is opinion backed with facts.
sc0ner 2 years ago
Comment removed
sc0ner 2 years ago
Comment removed
sc0ner 2 years ago
If McHugh didn't receive enough information to get a full picture of what the mothers' mental states were, then why is his testimony important?
ConfusedIcky 2 years ago
I guess Pro Life bombings and murders don't count then, huh?
Perrine234 2 years ago
Contribute to terrorism much?
gotilk 2 years ago
The women were stressing and in a panic and Tiller was ready to cash in on it.
ubermom 4 years ago 2