The Lithuanian language, whatever its antiquity, is of a wonderful structure, more perfect than either Sanskrit or Greek, more copious than Latin, and exquisitely refined than any of these three. So strong is this affinity that any philologist can see very clearly that Sanskrit, Greek and Latin must have sprung from a common source, Lithuanian. Theodore S. Thurston
All of the earliest languages such as sanskrit, Sumerian, Egyptian,the like where created by the Anunnaki, and differant parts of humanity where forced to learn these differant languages, so we could not work together to build structures. That's where the tower of babel story originated, and is spoken of in the Sumerian account.
all slaven when hear sanskrit can easy understand it...and this english propaganda about indo-european language look pathetic...sanskrit is closest to Russian,Serbian<Croatian,Bulgarian and other Slavic languages..With litle effort we can talk in sanskrit....so...THERE IS NO INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGE...sanskrit=slaven ancient...
@JimmyBarca AHAHAHAHHA IN YAH DREAMS SANSKRIT IS FROM THE IRANIAN- languages they maded it the iranian branch languages was the first language with sanskrit like indian-persian- and alot of others even RUSSIAN AND EUROPIAN LANGUAGES IS MADED BY THE GROUP IRANIAN languages sanskrit comes from the indus valley the first languags with the relgion zartoesm and hinduism so stfu fucking slavic !!!!
@iappleshahh this indian gods are same like slaven pagan gods(vishna brahma shiva=vishni bran abd zhiva)...and language is same...i understand 50% of sanskrit..and you....? litle turk
@JimmyBarca youre a turk go learn histor ahahahaha whole europa even the indian language hindi is an iranian branch language go read history
noob go to wiki and type iranian language you see pashtu farsi dari kurdish hindi oef and a lot of more language and noob youre not even an aryan our languages are sanskrit noob youre an asss language is kaukisch noob ahahah
youre ras is not even iranian or indian or afghan why the english ashole wanna steal our history ASHOLES
@JimmyBarca ahahah youre country is an turk country MONGOL AND SALVIC ARE MADED BY PERSIANS BECOUSE THEY WERE BALKANS AND BALKANS ARE MADED BY PERSIANS=IRANIANS GO READ HISTORY AND LEARN BOOKS NOOB
@iappleshahh i see no point talk with you...balkans are not made by any iraninans or iranians have anything ot do with slavic languages....slavic language is 50% of sanskrit so as i said can talk with this ppl who talk sanskrit...CAN YOU TURK...?
@zielonykasik hitler had no proud they stole our proud before 1935 they only aryans on the world were the iranian in iran and the indians-afghans and other the ras of the western is other how it can be that we was the first country with the aryan ras SO FUCK YOU HITLER
no, I'm sorry but anyone CANNOT learn sanskrit and upload it here. Until you are ready to set aside petty attatchments to your illusions and follow the lore of your forefathers you will not be able to do this. Try it - I guarantee you will make a video more embarrasing than this.
Это все хорошо, друзья.Но может кто-нибудь поговорить на древнем санскрите и закачать ролик сюда?
Индийские знатоки санскрита говорят что они вполне понимают русский язык и один даже отказался от переводчика в Москве.
This is all very interesting, friends. Anyone else can speak the ancient language of Sanskrit and send a movie here?
Indian scientists, experts in Sanskrit, they say that they fully understand the Russian language and one even refused the services of an interpreter in Moscow.
@FOREX07 someone who shaves tells everyone to shave.
A surprise?
San doesnt mean perfect, "like the sun...(chuckle) it means, generally "with." It can only mean perfect if it carries a sense of "completion" as in the the word sanskrit. sanskrit means "fully-elaborated."
some thing about the europeansis that they are just another race whereever they went or ruled they tried to manipulate the history of that place according to their convenience after all how can one civilization accept the dominance of other even in the past they do it because budhism is far more better than their pathetic christianity and after all all the europeans want their names to be attatched with better religion(way of living) how can they accept it to be done by asians
some thing about the europeansis that they are just another race whereever they went or ruled they tried to manipulate the history of that place according to their convenience after all how can one civilization accept the dominance of other even in the past they do it because budhism is far more better than their pathetic christianity and after all all the europeans want their names to be attatched with better religion(way of living) how can they accept it to be done by asians
@PortaCustodis thats just a complete piece of crap... dont belive that shitty scientific bullshit! just like there is genetic difference between asiatic and african lions, similarly there are human genetic species accross the globe...come on african changed to look like chinese and japanese???? lmao... get over that crap.
But in case anyone's genuinly interested: 'sam' (or 'san' - same thing) is a prefix that (generally) means "together". And '(s)kRta' means done/made/formed.
So saMskRta (further Romanised to 'sanskrit') means:" put together , constructed , well or completely formed ,(and hence) perfected. refined , adorned , ornamented , polished , highly elaborated (esp. applied to highly wrought speech , such as the Sanskrit language as opp , to the vernaculars)."
Indians clearly became close friends with Turks (Turk means human) as Budhism, Hinduism is Tengrism mixed with Indian culture, later corrupted. Sikhism is closest religion to Tengrism. It was thought to them by Saka Turks.
but the turks are muslim ... they are responsible for the whole islamic invasion into india which made hindus suffer for centuries.. i wouldnt like to associate are culture with the hindu wisdom narrow minded teachings
Actually, the practices of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Sikhi come from Yoga. And the proof of that goes to the Indus civilization. They have found carvings from the Indus civilization of people in yogic positions and meditation. And meditation is the core for all three faiths. In yoga you start with faith, God or a divine, but later you prove it. And the tool you use to prove it is through meditation.
Hinduism, Buddhism, and Sikhi only ask to trust the process. And that is the faith to start with. But later, after implementing that process, meditation, you will prove it through experience. From my understanding of Tengrism, there was no such concepts such as that.
You'll have to find reliable information about Tengrism. Not sources of imperialist powers such as European, Ottoman, Russian and Chinese.
The holy (ulu in Turkish which also means the howling of a wolf) sign of Tengrism is this: ⊕ It can be found all over Middle Asia graves and found archeological objects. Also understanding the Tree Of Life is very important.
ancalimonungol, I'm not denying your information about the Tengrism, but my point is the core of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Sikhi is about looking inwards. And a key way these religions do that is by meditation. Hinduism and Sikhi specifically refer to Yoga, both in the Sikhi holy book and the Rig Veda. Both books talk about meditation and Yoga. And this same style of Yoga goes back to the Indus Valley civilization. The same postures and ect. that we do for yoga today is in carving in the valley.
ancalimonungol, I guess you missed my point. I was stating that the core content that is in Hinduism, Buddhism, and Sikhi comes from one of the oldest civilizations, which is the Indus Valley Civilization. And the Indus Valley Civilization can be traced back to the Gulf of Cambay which is over 9,500 years old.
smoothgoomer, actually you haven't proven anything in your statement. There are primarily two groups of Hindus. Idol worshiping Hindus and non-idol worshiping Hindus. Both groups meditate, but the non-idol worshiping Hindus meditate without an image of an idol in their head. This is a practice non-idol worshiping Hindus take from the Vedas. And they translated the Vedas directly from Sanskrit to English with ancient Sanskrit text comparison. One group that does this is Arya Samaj.
"Vedic tradition of the Brahmins, whose religion was mostly sacrifice and ritual driven"
- In regards to the Brahmins, yes their practice is mostly sacrifice and ritual. But many people will agree they aren't practicing the teachings of the Vedas. They are practicing their own made up religion. That was proven by Dayananda Saraswati the founder of Arya Samaj. So it is wrong to call the Brahmin practices Vedic tradition, it's a clear mislabel.
Indo-European language concept is non-scientific and will be invalid in the near future.
"To be" is the foundation of all languages and it is from Turk language.
sanskrit: asmi, asi, asti
greek: eimi, ei, esi
latin: sum, es, est
Turk language and history is very. The Proto-Turkic language that's being talked in North of Pamir in Middle Asia is being talked since thousands of years
Sanskrit was never spoken by the common people. They were forced by the powerful religious elite. Who those people were I don't know. But they surely must have left some archeological evidence as they were the power.
The VEDAS, Rigveda, YajurVeda, Samaveda & Arthaveda which are the GOD's own words, created by LORD VISHNU were written in Sanskrit, Sages of that time preached the Vedas to people and this proves that Sanskrit was not forced to learn and speak but was the base language to teach and to learn. If you're still in doubt then get a brief knowledge about the VEDAS.
Thanks fro all these information. I will try to learn more about Vedas.
I don't believe in anything. For me belief is a destructive concept. It feels evil to want someone to belive you or believe in something. All I do is try to learn from everything and I can never learn completely.
Greco-Buddhism, sometimes spelt Graeco-Buddhism, refers to the cultural syncretism between Hellenistic culture and Buddhism, which developed between the 4th century BCE and the 5th century CE in the area covered by modern Afghanistan, Pakistan and north-western border regions of modern India.
It was a cultural consequence of a long chain of interactions begun by Greek forays into India from the time of Alexander the Great, carried further by the establishment of Indo-Greek rule in the area for some centuries, and extended during flourishing of the Hellenized empire of the Kushans.
Numerous works of Greco-Buddhist art display the intermixing of Greek and Buddhist influences, around such creation centers as Gandhara. The subject matter of Gandharan art was definitely Buddhist, while most motifs were of Western Asiatic or Hellenistic origin.
Greek artists were the authors of these early representations of the Buddha, in particular the standing statues, which display "a realistic treatment of the folds and on some even a hint of modeled volume that characterizes the best Greek work.
The Greek stylistic influence on the representation of the Buddha, through its idealistic realism, also permitted a very accessible, understandable and attractive visualization of the ultimate state of enlightenment described by Buddhism, allowing it reach a wider audience.
Greco-Buddhist art and Mahayana schools of thought such as Dhyana were transmitted to East Asia, central concepts of Hellenic culture such as virtue, excellence or quality have been adopted by the cultures of Korea and Japan after a long diffusion among the Hellenized cities of Central Asia, to become a key part of their warrior and work ethics.
What's your point buddy? that Sanskrit came from Greek language? There has been no any trace of annexation of the Greeks in the South East India? How come you say that Sanskrit came from Greece? You said Buddhism, Dhyan (meditation) were passed to South East Asia, I've a question: "From where did Buddhism Start?" South East Asia or the Europe ?
After understanding them, you have to see the connection with Christianity, Islam, etc... How they are indeed the same thing adapted to different cultures.
Tengrim somewhat parallels with Buddhism but it doesn't mean that Buddhism came from Tengrism because Buddhism was founded by Yogi/Price Siddhartha Gautam, more than that I don't need to understand Buddhism cause Buddhism and Hinduism rules in my place !!
Some of the Edicts of Ashoka inscriptions describe the efforts made by Ashoka to propagate the Buddhist faith throughout the Hellenistic world, which at that time formed an uninterrupted continuum from the borders of India to Greece
The Edicts indicate a clear understanding of the political organization in Hellenistic territories: the names and location of the main Greek monarchs of the time are identified, and they are claimed as recipients of Buddhist proselytism: Antiochus II Theos of the Seleucid Kingdom (261246 BCE), Ptolemy II Philadelphos of Egypt (285247 BCE), Antigonus Gonatas of Macedonia (276239 BCE), Magas of Cyrene (288258 BCE) .
Ten years (of reign) having been completed, King Piodasses (Ashoka) made known (the doctrine of) Piety (Greek:εὐσέβεια, Eusebeia) to men; and from this moment he has made men more pious, and everything thrives throughout the whole world." (Trans. from the Greek original by G.P. Carratelli[1])
The interaction between Greek and Buddhist cultures may have had some influence on the evolution of Mahayana, as the faith developed its sophisticated philosophical approach and a man-god treatment of the Buddha somewhat reminiscent of Hellenic gods. It is also around that time that the first anthropomorphic representations of the Buddha are found, often in realistic Greco-Buddhist style
Well some idiots keep saying that the greeks thought the indians the ancient language and all (refering to nixter888 the mother fucker) well it's cause of the misconception of the line "Wisdom brought from the West to the East" what that line actually referring to Buddhism which started in india and brought to china (for people who still dont get it) india is due west of china
Do you want to know what the Indians thought about the Greeks?...here it is!!! One of their scholars, Varāhamihira, in a passage where he calls on the people to honor the Brahmans, says....
Ancient Indian Hindus received Geeks with kindness because of theological similarities between these two cultures and their scientific superiority, which mesmerized ancient Indians.
We all know that the Greek language is the oldest of all of today's world languages!That can be witnessed from the tablets that were concealed for thousands of years from the Greek land and have been revealed during the last century (the last tablet found at Dispelion -Castoria has been dated to be at least 7000 years old).
It is not only well known but it is obvious, that all Arts and Sciences were born, developed and are still operating with a pure Greek vocabulary. The Greek language provides all those highly sophisticated words that can describe all abstract meanings.
Many times these Greek "protolexis", original words, return to the spoken Greek language as foreign. They are the so called re-loans. There is a large category of words, which through their own history, reveal the unknown Prehistory.
We can derive the conclusion that not only the Greek words but also the Greek Mythology and History have enriched all the languages with terms and words, of which most of the times we ignore their Greek origins.
The beginning of all these influxes is lost at the depths of history, when the Greeks, by being inventors and pioneers, flooded with their dialectical variety the poor neighbor languages of Hesperia (West), Hyperborea (South), the East and the South as well.
The Indian professor of linguistics Mr. Sacramborty (he speaks 22 languages), President of the "Greek Cycle" and Director of the Indian Ministry of Education, declares without any reservation that the Greek language has not derived from the Sanscritic, but the exact opposite is true.
The official periodical of the Greek-Indian Club is named "SAMELAN", (SELINE), (SEMELI), named after Dionysos mother. Dionysos was the first who at the ancient times civilized India.
President of their scientific committee is the Bask Hellenist and professor of Eastern Languages, Fredericko Sagredo (Homer Award in 1989 from the Onasis Foundation). They have reached the conclusion that the so called mysterious Baskic language has Greek origins. It includes not only the roots but whole Protohellenic, Pelasgic words.
The Greek language because of its plasticity and its mathematical nature, has the unique attribute to describe analytically or synthetically all minor meanings, details and gratings.
The etymology of most Greek words and especially the verbs - apart from a significant number of the Hellenic ones - goes back to a proto-language, a "mother" language, which was called proto-hellenic.
In other words the ancient Greek language has a strong kinship with Sanskrit, ancient Indian, Hittite, Slavic, Celtic and Latin, as well as other languages which were spoken in India, East Asia and Europe and belong to the same family,because they derived from it!
The ancient Greek language is internationally recognized as a major cultural achievement and an irreplaceable treasure of wisdom for all humanity. Sanskrit is not!
As an alternative medicine, Unani has found favour in Asia, especially India. In India, These Unani practitioners can practice as qualified doctors, as the Indian government approves their practice. Unani medicine is the mother of Ayurveda.
Asclepius, god of medicine, and the rational medical theories of the Greek physician Hippocrates. Unlike Egypt, where spiritual and rational medicine were inextricably combined, patients were able to choose between the two traditions.
Greek literature had penetrated into India, influencing their playwrights,,,WHAT ELSE DO YOU WANT TO KNOW, IN ORDER TO BELIEVE THAT INDIA IS THE DAUGHTER OF GREECE?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Sanskrit is a fake language. It was created in order to find a basis for western civilization which is the youngest of civilizations. But this guy is funny.
What are you some kind of cave man from Europe? The oldest language from europe is grunting like a bunch of wild cave men and fighting for a raw peice of meat.
You're a dumb ;-) SUCKER !! You've got no brains at all uhhahahahahaha ...First read books learn Sanskrit and then you will know what Sanskrit is uhahahaha ....STUPID !!
It's the world's newest language that was constructed and made you think I'm a dumb and a sucker. It's the language that divided the the unified world into different nations and spread the seeds of hate into every human being. It's the language that lead to corrupted semitic religions. Therefore it's fake.
That's why I called as a Dumb cayuse you know nothing!! Sanskrit is one of the Oldest Language and the MOTHER Language of the Southeast Asian Countries like Nepal, India, Bangladesh and else !! Language never divides the nation !! It's people. People created religion and people divided among them. Language and Religion has nothing to do with division it's the people who divides. !! First learn about Sanskrit's history and then you will know !!
You have to understand the importance of language on the identity of cultures. If you are into languages, read some of the books that are harder to find, and or are censored by some governments. If you can find them.
lol..but why? to know that Sanskrit is the cause of discrimination? The language of hate? lol....Wha'ts written in Gene D. Matlock? To know the fact that it was derived from other languages? What's your point?
It's hard to tell without you learning what I learned. What I'm telling you is that there was a corruption; a mix up of languages at one point of history to stop people of the world from understanding each other. What's written in Matlock's book is not enough to understand as it tells a totally different story not related to languages alone. Know that there was "one" language spoken at one point and it was not Sanskrit.
Sanskrti is ONE of the Oldest language like Latin, Greek and else and I didn't say that Sanskrit is the ONLY oldest language, even if we trace back to history Greek, Latin, Sanskrit can't be the oldest language because there were other languages that could have been vaporized when they were updated with time. And it doesn't mean that any of these languages are the oldest. When one path is lost another opens, same thing is for the Religion and the languages !!
You are pathetic!!!The Greeks came to you country ,and gave you knowledge!!!THEY GAVE YOU THE VEDAS!!!OIDA=KNOWLEDGE!!!
GREEKS IDIOT ARE THE OLDEST WHITE NATION OF THE WORLD!!!32.000 YEARS AGO THEY HAD THE GREATEST CIVILIZATION IN GREECE,AND THE AEGEAN!!!LEARN THE TRUTH,IGNORANTS!!!
you went too far by talking about the Vedas like that. the Vedas contains chants, hymns and stories of Hinduism. Why the FUCK would you even think that the Greeks gave the Indians the Vedas. They're not even Hindu god damn it.....
"when the Indo-Aryans composed the Vedas, there were no Greeks in what is now Greece. so shut it."
- This is actually true. I keep hearing this same crap from an uneducated person. That all Sanskrit came from Europe, but they don't have any proof. This is a joke. They can't admit that maybe it went the other way. It was the Sanskrit speaking Indians that brought language and civilization to Europe.
emmarcee, you are talking about the standardized form of Sanskrit created by Panini. I'm talking about Sanskrit pre-Panini. Also known as Vedic. I call it Sanskrit here because most people won't know what Vedic means. I guess I should call it Vedic Sanskrit. Either way, there is no reason to call me 'idiot'. Grow up.
@tomtomttom ignorance is always vain. There is a difference between Indo-Europeans and Indo-Aryans. They gave them everything, and they spread because they're the nonconformists in the Vedas. They don't have to follow wisdom; they're cool like that.
@returnoftheramble Actually the word Aryan never referred to a race. In Sanskrit it means noble. It was ignorant people that wanted to refer to themselves as always being noble and made it the word for their race.
@tomtomttom I think they mean the people prior to the Indo-Europeans, nobles. The people of the region spread their knowledge northwards of farming, but the calendars seem to have come from way up north.
@tomtomttom there were two different races, it seems. Indo-Europeans refer to themselves as Aryans when they weren't. They came second. The Indo-Aryans or whatever they were, excuse me, possessed the knowledge first because they came up with farming and a relaxed life. There's proof. What confuses me are the dern calendars.
@returnoftheramble "The Indo-Aryans or whatever they were, excuse me, possessed the knowledge first because they came up with farming and a relaxed life. "
- That's true. The population that was in the subcontinent first came up with a lot of things first and the invaders from the north just took it and claimed it as their own, but their wasn't just one invasion, but numerous. In the case of the word Aryan, it means 'noble.' It never was meant to refer to a race. That came later.
@returnoftheramble I believe the Persians were the first to refer to themselves as Aryans as a race. And later that idea spread to other parts of Asia. At least they are the first group in recorded history to claim that. Even the word Iran comes from Aryan to show pride for the Aryan race. The sad thing is before that Arya was used all over India to mean something much different, such as noble. Even today the word Arya is used to mean noble, Arya Samaj = noble society. Nothing to do with race.
@tomtomttom You know Sanskrit is very close to Russian :) In Russia there is a huge amount of names of rivers, lakes etc. and just ancient words which they are using in their speach till nowadays are pronounced in a pure Sanskrit!
OH YES?THIS IS WHAT THEY TOLD YOU?MYCENAEAN CIVILIZATION SINCE 12.600 B.C.!!!ARE YOU DOING THAT IN PURPOSE OR WHAT?Greek language since 32.000 years ago!!!at list!!!!Take your self out of your ignorance!!!!THE GREEK LANGUAGE AS WE KNOW IT TODAY,WITH THE SAME ALPHABET,SINCE 2000 B.C!!!OPEN YOUR EYES!!
Yes idiot! indian disgrace PLAY AROUND you little games!!!of course you are going to react this way...you are in despair!...try to prove me wrong ..idiot!
Aren't all these statements made by you? All these comments still exist in case you start saying you never said these things. I cannot prove that jokes are wrong!! But you prove that zeus was not a devil and greeks were not monkeys!!
This is no proof!! I dare you to prove that Zeus was not a devil and greeks were the monkeys who were AWOL from Lord. Rama's army..first prove this..I DARE YOU!! and what's OUSTTT? whatever, shove your oustt up your behind...
Don't change the topic. I am daring you to disprove that Zeus was a devil and greeks were the monkeys who were AWOL from Lord. Rama's army..first prove this..I DARE YOU!! and then ask me questions.
Which god are you talking about? Zeus? He was actually a devil teaching the language of hell to the monkeys who were in greece...I dare you to prove that it was not the devil!!
The mother of the world idiot is only GREECE!!!AND THE MOTHER LANGUAGE OF THE EARTH IS GREEK LANGUAGE!!!THE ONLY LANGUAGE!!!all the others are the corruption of GREEK!!!and that's a fact!!!!ignorants!!!!oust!!!!
"The mother of the world idiot is only GREECE"...This is the first time I have this kind of statement after Saddam Hussein!! The "mother of world idiots"!! are Greeks!! Now I understand why nixter and other greeks behave like they do...
I think you are mistaking us for greek. We do not catch chickens...we trained the greeks to do that for us! So you go catch a chicken and bring it to me...
Those who belonged to Vedic culture many times laugh of those people discussing on Sanskrit scripts without even theoretical knowledge of What Vedic culture means.Original name of Sanskrit is Samskrita which means purified language which have no different in north or south India.British pronounced as sanskrit and it is taken as Sanskrit whenever we are discussing it in English.Vedas are Vedas only in anywhere and everywhere.
Even many Western Scholars will admit, the first written evidence of Sanskrit was in Brahmi Script. Where is your proof that there is older Sanskrit writing in Central Asia.
"India was the mother of our race and Sanskrit the mother of Europe's languages. She was the mother of our philosophy, mother through the Arabs, of much of our mathematics, mother through Buddha, of the ideals embodied in Christianity, mother through village communities of self-government and democracy. Mother India is in many ways the mother of us all."
- Will Durant author, The Story of Civilization, Simon & Schuster, the Story of Philosophy, Touchstone
I mean, do you even know what Sanskrit is called in South India. Some people call it Samskrit, and some people believe that was its original name and later changed by the nomads that came to North India.
Sanskrit for Sanskrit is indeed "Samskrit," but that is attested in Sanskrit itself. It's not like South Indians have like some ancient secret, it's an accepted fact. It's only ever called Sanskrit in non-Sanskrit languages.
Well if you go to North India they call it Sanskrit. They even teach that in Sanskrit schools, in the North. In many South Indian Sanskrit schools they call it Samskrit. The real name of Sanskrit.
Rolf & Tomtom, Have either of you read Stephen Oppenheimer's book "The Real Eve." He proposes that all East Asian and European peoples originated near the Indus Valley Civi. and one route was northern via Kashmir. I wonder if this sheds any light on the origin of Sanskrit. Any thoughts you might have on this will be appreciated.
I haven't read it, but I would like to. I'm not surprised by his idea. We are finding evidence that the last ice age ended around ten to twelve thousand years ago. India is right next to the equator. So the logical idea is civilizations had to start somewhere near the equator and spread as the ice melted.
And every time they find a new Civilization, people like you, RolfLarsson have to rework your theories about India. Before Bay of Cambay everyone was saying Indian civilization was only 3,000 years old, at the oldest. Now they are changing their mind. My point is Westerns don't know, but they can't admit they don't know. They have to keep saying they somehow know the whole of Indian history. YOU DON'T KNOW.
Or try and act like they know most of it. It is pretty arrogant of those scientist. Even today, we still don't know the history of native population of America. And we keep reworking those ideas. RolfLarsson, you don't know with certainty that Sanskrit came from Eastern Europe or Central Asia, we still need to look at the information from the Bay of Cambay.
Yes we still do, but you're jumping to some pretty far-off conclusions, and expecting me to do the same. Yes, they found ruins in the Bay of Cambay. Does that in itself mean Sanskrit originated in India? Not at at all.
I still haven't seen many Western Scholars that looked into Sanskrit writing that was done research into 'Dirvidian Script'. I mean Brahmi or older Kharosti and even older scripts from that. Most Western Scholars look at Devanagari as the source of Sanskrit's age in India. Devanagari is pretty new script compared to the much older 'Darvidian' Scripts.
It's not the age of the scripts that are in question, but the language itself. Gothic was written in a Greek-type script in the 4th century, but that doesn't mean that Gothic in its 4th century form went back as far as Greek did. It's just the script. The words themselves are important.
"It's not the age of the scripts that are in question, but the language itself." and how do you prove that. You can't without the written proof. And in central Asia they don't have that proof. You just make linguistic assumptions, but that isn't proof. If anything the written proof shows that Sanskrit came from India.
RolfLarsson, you said, yourself that you don't believe it until you see the written proof of Sanskrit from the Bay of Cambay. Well you should apply that to Central Asia as well. Find proof of Sanskrit that is older than the written text in India from central Asia.
Let's even take a look at the oldest writing about Buddha. Or even from King Ashoka's time. It was written in Sanskrit, using 'Darvidian' script. It was later written using Devanagari Script, but the first uses was in 'Darvidian' Script.
Because the Indo-Aryans were a nomadic people, meaning they didn't have writing. It was all oral long before it was written down.
And listen, I'm not saying I know everything, I'm just saying that I have yet to see conclusive evidence supporting the idea that Vedic culture and the Sanskrit language magically originated in India.
This has been flagged as spam show
does anyone know what this translates to in english?
सर्ववस्तूनि कारणोद्भवानि
spinksboi 1 week ago
Русский - это древняя, архаичная форма санскрита.
TheAlekiraRain 2 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
The Lithuanian language, whatever its antiquity, is of a wonderful structure, more perfect than either Sanskrit or Greek, more copious than Latin, and exquisitely refined than any of these three. So strong is this affinity that any philologist can see very clearly that Sanskrit, Greek and Latin must have sprung from a common source, Lithuanian. Theodore S. Thurston
LietuvosRespublika 3 months ago
All of the earliest languages such as sanskrit, Sumerian, Egyptian,the like where created by the Anunnaki, and differant parts of humanity where forced to learn these differant languages, so we could not work together to build structures. That's where the tower of babel story originated, and is spoken of in the Sumerian account.
Nakor420ish 7 months ago
@Nakor420ish African Semitic occult nonsense
VendPrekmurec 2 months ago
San skript! serbian!
115RM511MR 7 months ago
all slaven when hear sanskrit can easy understand it...and this english propaganda about indo-european language look pathetic...sanskrit is closest to Russian,Serbian<Croatian,Bulgarian and other Slavic languages..With litle effort we can talk in sanskrit....so...THERE IS NO INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGE...sanskrit=slaven ancient...
/watch?v=ixkd9phZX4g
Here is link so you can see it your-self..
JimmyBarca 7 months ago
@JimmyBarca AHAHAHAHHA IN YAH DREAMS SANSKRIT IS FROM THE IRANIAN- languages they maded it the iranian branch languages was the first language with sanskrit like indian-persian- and alot of others even RUSSIAN AND EUROPIAN LANGUAGES IS MADED BY THE GROUP IRANIAN languages sanskrit comes from the indus valley the first languags with the relgion zartoesm and hinduism so stfu fucking slavic !!!!
iappleshahh 1 month ago
@iappleshahh this indian gods are same like slaven pagan gods(vishna brahma shiva=vishni bran abd zhiva)...and language is same...i understand 50% of sanskrit..and you....? litle turk
JimmyBarca 1 month ago
@JimmyBarca youre a turk go learn histor ahahahaha whole europa even the indian language hindi is an iranian branch language go read history
noob go to wiki and type iranian language you see pashtu farsi dari kurdish hindi oef and a lot of more language and noob youre not even an aryan our languages are sanskrit noob youre an asss language is kaukisch noob ahahah
youre ras is not even iranian or indian or afghan why the english ashole wanna steal our history ASHOLES
iappleshahh 1 month ago
@JimmyBarca ahahah youre country is an turk country MONGOL AND SALVIC ARE MADED BY PERSIANS BECOUSE THEY WERE BALKANS AND BALKANS ARE MADED BY PERSIANS=IRANIANS GO READ HISTORY AND LEARN BOOKS NOOB
iappleshahh 1 month ago
@iappleshahh i see no point talk with you...balkans are not made by any iraninans or iranians have anything ot do with slavic languages....slavic language is 50% of sanskrit so as i said can talk with this ppl who talk sanskrit...CAN YOU TURK...?
JimmyBarca 1 month ago
Sanskrit is the predecessor of many EASTERN languages, not Western
zielonykasik 7 months ago
@zielonykasik hitler had no proud they stole our proud before 1935 they only aryans on the world were the iranian in iran and the indians-afghans and other the ras of the western is other how it can be that we was the first country with the aryan ras SO FUCK YOU HITLER
iappleshahh 1 month ago
no, I'm sorry but anyone CANNOT learn sanskrit and upload it here. Until you are ready to set aside petty attatchments to your illusions and follow the lore of your forefathers you will not be able to do this. Try it - I guarantee you will make a video more embarrasing than this.
grantvaughn 8 months ago
what a dumb dumb!
paulakhs 9 months ago
fucking hipy idiot u need to shawe ur beard and hair
iw0ntcry 10 months ago
Это все хорошо, друзья.Но может кто-нибудь поговорить на древнем санскрите и закачать ролик сюда?
Индийские знатоки санскрита говорят что они вполне понимают русский язык и один даже отказался от переводчика в Москве.
This is all very interesting, friends. Anyone else can speak the ancient language of Sanskrit and send a movie here?
Indian scientists, experts in Sanskrit, they say that they fully understand the Russian language and one even refused the services of an interpreter in Moscow.
VladPK11 11 months ago
stupid hippie get a fucking job u scum
andresrojas22 1 year ago
@andresrojas22... Hell Yeah!
FOREX07 1 year ago
Go shave you fucking stupid ass hippee!!
FOREX07 1 year ago
@FOREX07 someone who shaves tells everyone to shave.
A surprise?
San doesnt mean perfect, "like the sun...(chuckle) it means, generally "with." It can only mean perfect if it carries a sense of "completion" as in the the word sanskrit. sanskrit means "fully-elaborated."
ippolytos1 1 year ago
'r is for regress', exactly
quercusvulgaris 1 year ago
AFTER ALL BUDDHA WAS A GREEK and VEDAS were written in AMERICA and
KUNGFU was established in BRITAIN and every good things were done by cockASSians and chinese japnese and indians were fools
manojsoni3 1 year ago
@manojsoni3 you are the most retarded person i have ever seen
buddha greek?
fuckturks2223 1 year ago
AFTER ALL BUDDHA WAS A GREEK and VEDAS were written in AMERICA and
KUNGFU was established in BRITAIN and every good things were done by cockASSians and chinese japnese and indians were fools
manojsoni3 1 year ago
some thing about the europeansis that they are just another race whereever they went or ruled they tried to manipulate the history of that place according to their convenience after all how can one civilization accept the dominance of other even in the past they do it because budhism is far more better than their pathetic christianity and after all all the europeans want their names to be attatched with better religion(way of living) how can they accept it to be done by asians
manojsoni3 1 year ago
@manojsoni3 christianity is not european
andresrojas22 1 year ago
@andresrojas22 yes of course because it came from maxico and was developed by mayans
manojsoni3 1 year ago
some thing about the europeansis that they are just another race whereever they went or ruled they tried to manipulate the history of that place according to their convenience after all how can one civilization accept the dominance of other even in the past they do it because budhism is far more better than their pathetic christianity and after all all the europeans want their names to be attatched with better religion(way of living) how can they accept it to be done by asians
manojsoni3 1 year ago
@manojsoni3 , You can speak Sanskrit?
VladPK11 11 months ago
tartaria a verry antique write about 5500 i.e.n and summerian is 4000i.en
tenorul 1 year ago
Who cares? According to genetic evidence, all humans came from Africa. So, ultimately, no one came from Europe OR India.
PortaCustodis 1 year ago
@PortaCustodis thats just a complete piece of crap... dont belive that shitty scientific bullshit! just like there is genetic difference between asiatic and african lions, similarly there are human genetic species accross the globe...come on african changed to look like chinese and japanese???? lmao... get over that crap.
tigersoup 1 year ago
hi i was wondering can you write
In order to be irreplaceable one must always be different
in sankrit for me and post it i really want to get that tatto on my hip so please help me thankss
modelface00 1 year ago
Hi John -
Joke right?
But in case anyone's genuinly interested: 'sam' (or 'san' - same thing) is a prefix that (generally) means "together". And '(s)kRta' means done/made/formed.
So saMskRta (further Romanised to 'sanskrit') means:" put together , constructed , well or completely formed ,(and hence) perfected. refined , adorned , ornamented , polished , highly elaborated (esp. applied to highly wrought speech , such as the Sanskrit language as opp , to the vernaculars)."
Glad to help :-)
hceggeberth 2 years ago 2
Nice Video. Thank you for putting it up here.
iam4friendz 2 years ago
Indians clearly became close friends with Turks (Turk means human) as Budhism, Hinduism is Tengrism mixed with Indian culture, later corrupted. Sikhism is closest religion to Tengrism. It was thought to them by Saka Turks.
ancalimonungol 2 years ago
Uhhh.... You really enjoy just making up wild facts.
spacekangaroo 2 years ago 2
but the turks are muslim ... they are responsible for the whole islamic invasion into india which made hindus suffer for centuries.. i wouldnt like to associate are culture with the hindu wisdom narrow minded teachings
tarun1982 2 years ago
There wasn't even Christianity let alone Islam back then. Turks were responsible for Tengrism.
ancalimonungol 2 years ago
Actually, the practices of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Sikhi come from Yoga. And the proof of that goes to the Indus civilization. They have found carvings from the Indus civilization of people in yogic positions and meditation. And meditation is the core for all three faiths. In yoga you start with faith, God or a divine, but later you prove it. And the tool you use to prove it is through meditation.
tomtomttom 2 years ago
Hinduism, Buddhism, and Sikhi only ask to trust the process. And that is the faith to start with. But later, after implementing that process, meditation, you will prove it through experience. From my understanding of Tengrism, there was no such concepts such as that.
tomtomttom 2 years ago
You'll have to find reliable information about Tengrism. Not sources of imperialist powers such as European, Ottoman, Russian and Chinese.
The holy (ulu in Turkish which also means the howling of a wolf) sign of Tengrism is this: ⊕ It can be found all over Middle Asia graves and found archeological objects. Also understanding the Tree Of Life is very important.
ancalimonungol 2 years ago
ancalimonungol, I'm not denying your information about the Tengrism, but my point is the core of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Sikhi is about looking inwards. And a key way these religions do that is by meditation. Hinduism and Sikhi specifically refer to Yoga, both in the Sikhi holy book and the Rig Veda. Both books talk about meditation and Yoga. And this same style of Yoga goes back to the Indus Valley civilization. The same postures and ect. that we do for yoga today is in carving in the valley.
tomtomttom 2 years ago
So's the same for Tengrism. ;) Hinduism and Buddhism are just ways to remember and honour the good old Tengri.
ancalimonungol 2 years ago
ancalimonungol, I guess you missed my point. I was stating that the core content that is in Hinduism, Buddhism, and Sikhi comes from one of the oldest civilizations, which is the Indus Valley Civilization. And the Indus Valley Civilization can be traced back to the Gulf of Cambay which is over 9,500 years old.
tomtomttom 2 years ago
My point is, Tengrism might have actually come from the subcontinent.
tomtomttom 2 years ago
Comment removed
smoothgoomer 1 year ago
smoothgoomer, actually you haven't proven anything in your statement. There are primarily two groups of Hindus. Idol worshiping Hindus and non-idol worshiping Hindus. Both groups meditate, but the non-idol worshiping Hindus meditate without an image of an idol in their head. This is a practice non-idol worshiping Hindus take from the Vedas. And they translated the Vedas directly from Sanskrit to English with ancient Sanskrit text comparison. One group that does this is Arya Samaj.
tomtomttom 1 year ago
"Vedic tradition of the Brahmins, whose religion was mostly sacrifice and ritual driven"
- In regards to the Brahmins, yes their practice is mostly sacrifice and ritual. But many people will agree they aren't practicing the teachings of the Vedas. They are practicing their own made up religion. That was proven by Dayananda Saraswati the founder of Arya Samaj. So it is wrong to call the Brahmin practices Vedic tradition, it's a clear mislabel.
tomtomttom 1 year ago
Comment removed
ancalimonungol 2 years ago
Indo-European language concept is non-scientific and will be invalid in the near future.
"To be" is the foundation of all languages and it is from Turk language.
sanskrit: asmi, asi, asti
greek: eimi, ei, esi
latin: sum, es, est
Turk language and history is very. The Proto-Turkic language that's being talked in North of Pamir in Middle Asia is being talked since thousands of years
Turk: esi, em, esi en, esi
Antolian Turkish: Ettim (Ettim Ben) Ettin (Ettin Sen), Etti (Etti O)
ancalimonungol 2 years ago
If "san" or "sans" = perfect or perfected, might there be a relationship to the name "Susan" or "Sandra", etc.?
christopherjm111 2 years ago
Check out under my favorite videos: "HINDU INDIA - THE BIRTH OF CIVILIZATION DWARKA 10,000 YEAR OLD METROPOLIS FOUND PART 1 of 5"
tomtomttom 3 years ago
Check out all five parts. It is pretty good.
tomtomttom 3 years ago
What Strange Mystery Unites the Turkish Nations, India, Catholicism, and Mexico?: A Concise but Detailed History of Things Divine and Earthly
by Gene D. Matlock
This is the name of the book.
ancalimonungol 3 years ago
Sanskrit was never spoken by the common people. They were forced by the powerful religious elite. Who those people were I don't know. But they surely must have left some archeological evidence as they were the power.
ancalimonungol 3 years ago
The VEDAS, Rigveda, YajurVeda, Samaveda & Arthaveda which are the GOD's own words, created by LORD VISHNU were written in Sanskrit, Sages of that time preached the Vedas to people and this proves that Sanskrit was not forced to learn and speak but was the base language to teach and to learn. If you're still in doubt then get a brief knowledge about the VEDAS.
OSushil 3 years ago
Thanks fro all these information. I will try to learn more about Vedas.
I don't believe in anything. For me belief is a destructive concept. It feels evil to want someone to belive you or believe in something. All I do is try to learn from everything and I can never learn completely.
ancalimonungol 3 years ago
The mother fucker nixter888 suggest, you do one thing!!!Accept the truth!Even Buddhism has Greek elements!
nixter888 3 years ago
Greco-Buddhism, sometimes spelt Graeco-Buddhism, refers to the cultural syncretism between Hellenistic culture and Buddhism, which developed between the 4th century BCE and the 5th century CE in the area covered by modern Afghanistan, Pakistan and north-western border regions of modern India.
nixter888 3 years ago
It was a cultural consequence of a long chain of interactions begun by Greek forays into India from the time of Alexander the Great, carried further by the establishment of Indo-Greek rule in the area for some centuries, and extended during flourishing of the Hellenized empire of the Kushans.
nixter888 3 years ago
Numerous works of Greco-Buddhist art display the intermixing of Greek and Buddhist influences, around such creation centers as Gandhara. The subject matter of Gandharan art was definitely Buddhist, while most motifs were of Western Asiatic or Hellenistic origin.
nixter888 3 years ago
Greek artists were the authors of these early representations of the Buddha, in particular the standing statues, which display "a realistic treatment of the folds and on some even a hint of modeled volume that characterizes the best Greek work.
nixter888 3 years ago
The Greek stylistic influence on the representation of the Buddha, through its idealistic realism, also permitted a very accessible, understandable and attractive visualization of the ultimate state of enlightenment described by Buddhism, allowing it reach a wider audience.
nixter888 3 years ago
Numerous parallels exist between the Greek philosophy of the Cynics and, several centuries later, the Buddhist philosophy of the Madhyamika and Zen.
nixter888 3 years ago
Greco-Buddhist art and Mahayana schools of thought such as Dhyana were transmitted to East Asia, central concepts of Hellenic culture such as virtue, excellence or quality have been adopted by the cultures of Korea and Japan after a long diffusion among the Hellenized cities of Central Asia, to become a key part of their warrior and work ethics.
[edit] Greco-Buddhism and the West
nixter888 3 years ago
If i had no life like you i would too copy and paste paragraphs from multiple websites that think the other way
kingas1992 3 years ago
ACCEPT THE TRUTH,and leave the "big"talking!
nixter888 3 years ago
What's your point buddy? that Sanskrit came from Greek language? There has been no any trace of annexation of the Greeks in the South East India? How come you say that Sanskrit came from Greece? You said Buddhism, Dhyan (meditation) were passed to South East Asia, I've a question: "From where did Buddhism Start?" South East Asia or the Europe ?
OSushil 3 years ago
To understand Buddhism for real, you have to understand Tengri and Tengrism first.
ancalimonungol 3 years ago
After understanding them, you have to see the connection with Christianity, Islam, etc... How they are indeed the same thing adapted to different cultures.
ancalimonungol 3 years ago
Tengrim somewhat parallels with Buddhism but it doesn't mean that Buddhism came from Tengrism because Buddhism was founded by Yogi/Price Siddhartha Gautam, more than that I don't need to understand Buddhism cause Buddhism and Hinduism rules in my place !!
OSushil 3 years ago
Saka Turks were the first Turks that went to Hindustan (India). Sidharta Sakyamuni (Budha) is a member of the Saka ruler family "Sakyamuni"
After Sakas' many other Turks had relationships with Hindustan
ancalimonungol 3 years ago
Some of the Edicts of Ashoka inscriptions describe the efforts made by Ashoka to propagate the Buddhist faith throughout the Hellenistic world, which at that time formed an uninterrupted continuum from the borders of India to Greece
nixter888 3 years ago
The Edicts indicate a clear understanding of the political organization in Hellenistic territories: the names and location of the main Greek monarchs of the time are identified, and they are claimed as recipients of Buddhist proselytism: Antiochus II Theos of the Seleucid Kingdom (261246 BCE), Ptolemy II Philadelphos of Egypt (285247 BCE), Antigonus Gonatas of Macedonia (276239 BCE), Magas of Cyrene (288258 BCE) .
nixter888 3 years ago
Ten years (of reign) having been completed, King Piodasses (Ashoka) made known (the doctrine of) Piety (Greek:εὐσέβεια, Eusebeia) to men; and from this moment he has made men more pious, and everything thrives throughout the whole world." (Trans. from the Greek original by G.P. Carratelli[1])
nixter888 3 years ago
The interaction between Greek and Buddhist cultures may have had some influence on the evolution of Mahayana, as the faith developed its sophisticated philosophical approach and a man-god treatment of the Buddha somewhat reminiscent of Hellenic gods. It is also around that time that the first anthropomorphic representations of the Buddha are found, often in realistic Greco-Buddhist style
nixter888 3 years ago
Well some idiots keep saying that the greeks thought the indians the ancient language and all (refering to nixter888 the mother fucker) well it's cause of the misconception of the line "Wisdom brought from the West to the East" what that line actually referring to Buddhism which started in india and brought to china (for people who still dont get it) india is due west of china
kingas1992 3 years ago
Do you want to know what the Indians thought about the Greeks?...here it is!!! One of their scholars, Varāhamihira, in a passage where he calls on the people to honor the Brahmans, says....
nixter888 3 years ago
"the Greeks, though impure, must be honored, since they are trained in sciences, and therein excelled others."
nixter888 3 years ago
Ancient Indian Hindus received Geeks with kindness because of theological similarities between these two cultures and their scientific superiority, which mesmerized ancient Indians.
nixter888 3 years ago
We all know that the Greek language is the oldest of all of today's world languages!That can be witnessed from the tablets that were concealed for thousands of years from the Greek land and have been revealed during the last century (the last tablet found at Dispelion -Castoria has been dated to be at least 7000 years old).
nixter888 3 years ago
It is not only well known but it is obvious, that all Arts and Sciences were born, developed and are still operating with a pure Greek vocabulary. The Greek language provides all those highly sophisticated words that can describe all abstract meanings.
nixter888 3 years ago
Many times these Greek "protolexis", original words, return to the spoken Greek language as foreign. They are the so called re-loans. There is a large category of words, which through their own history, reveal the unknown Prehistory.
nixter888 3 years ago
We can derive the conclusion that not only the Greek words but also the Greek Mythology and History have enriched all the languages with terms and words, of which most of the times we ignore their Greek origins.
nixter888 3 years ago
The beginning of all these influxes is lost at the depths of history, when the Greeks, by being inventors and pioneers, flooded with their dialectical variety the poor neighbor languages of Hesperia (West), Hyperborea (South), the East and the South as well.
nixter888 3 years ago
The Indian professor of linguistics Mr. Sacramborty (he speaks 22 languages), President of the "Greek Cycle" and Director of the Indian Ministry of Education, declares without any reservation that the Greek language has not derived from the Sanscritic, but the exact opposite is true.
nixter888 3 years ago
The official periodical of the Greek-Indian Club is named "SAMELAN", (SELINE), (SEMELI), named after Dionysos mother. Dionysos was the first who at the ancient times civilized India.
nixter888 3 years ago
President of their scientific committee is the Bask Hellenist and professor of Eastern Languages, Fredericko Sagredo (Homer Award in 1989 from the Onasis Foundation). They have reached the conclusion that the so called mysterious Baskic language has Greek origins. It includes not only the roots but whole Protohellenic, Pelasgic words.
nixter888 3 years ago
The Greek language because of its plasticity and its mathematical nature, has the unique attribute to describe analytically or synthetically all minor meanings, details and gratings.
nixter888 3 years ago
The etymology of most Greek words and especially the verbs - apart from a significant number of the Hellenic ones - goes back to a proto-language, a "mother" language, which was called proto-hellenic.
nixter888 3 years ago
In other words the ancient Greek language has a strong kinship with Sanskrit, ancient Indian, Hittite, Slavic, Celtic and Latin, as well as other languages which were spoken in India, East Asia and Europe and belong to the same family,because they derived from it!
nixter888 3 years ago
The ancient Greek language is internationally recognized as a major cultural achievement and an irreplaceable treasure of wisdom for all humanity. Sanskrit is not!
nixter888 3 years ago
As an alternative medicine, Unani has found favour in Asia, especially India. In India, These Unani practitioners can practice as qualified doctors, as the Indian government approves their practice. Unani medicine is the mother of Ayurveda.
nixter888 3 years ago
Asclepius, god of medicine, and the rational medical theories of the Greek physician Hippocrates. Unlike Egypt, where spiritual and rational medicine were inextricably combined, patients were able to choose between the two traditions.
nixter888 3 years ago
Asclepius was originally a Greek doctor of around 12000 BC, who became deified over the centuries as the Greek god of medicine.
nixter888 3 years ago
Greek literature had penetrated into India, influencing their playwrights,,,WHAT ELSE DO YOU WANT TO KNOW, IN ORDER TO BELIEVE THAT INDIA IS THE DAUGHTER OF GREECE?
nixter888 3 years ago
AHAM BRAHMASMI is broken down as
I'M BRAHMA-BRAHMA AS MI ( me )
Here BRAHMA is a cyclic word (think it like a superimposed word)
TATTVAM ASI is broken down as TATTVAM AS I.
(TATTVAM means elements)
Its a big philosophy stored in its meaning. Agree?
umeshway 3 years ago
I agree with you, vedic sanskrit is an ancient language
caribbeanNO1 3 years ago
Sanskrit is the foundation for latin and other languages. .
caribbeanNO1 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sanskrit is a fake language. It was created in order to find a basis for western civilization which is the youngest of civilizations. But this guy is funny.
ancalimonungol 3 years ago
Bwaahahah! A fake language?
Take that with any historian worth his salt. And then get back.
yt2vinay 3 years ago
What are you some kind of cave man from Europe? The oldest language from europe is grunting like a bunch of wild cave men and fighting for a raw peice of meat.
caribbeanNO1 3 years ago
You're a dumb ;-) SUCKER !! You've got no brains at all uhhahahahahaha ...First read books learn Sanskrit and then you will know what Sanskrit is uhahahaha ....STUPID !!
OSushil 3 years ago
It's the world's newest language that was constructed and made you think I'm a dumb and a sucker. It's the language that divided the the unified world into different nations and spread the seeds of hate into every human being. It's the language that lead to corrupted semitic religions. Therefore it's fake.
ancalimonungol 3 years ago
That's why I called as a Dumb cayuse you know nothing!! Sanskrit is one of the Oldest Language and the MOTHER Language of the Southeast Asian Countries like Nepal, India, Bangladesh and else !! Language never divides the nation !! It's people. People created religion and people divided among them. Language and Religion has nothing to do with division it's the people who divides. !! First learn about Sanskrit's history and then you will know !!
OSushil 3 years ago
You have to understand the importance of language on the identity of cultures. If you are into languages, read some of the books that are harder to find, and or are censored by some governments. If you can find them.
ancalimonungol 3 years ago
OSushil. Try to find a book written by Gene D. Matlock.
ancalimonungol 3 years ago
lol..but why? to know that Sanskrit is the cause of discrimination? The language of hate? lol....Wha'ts written in Gene D. Matlock? To know the fact that it was derived from other languages? What's your point?
OSushil 3 years ago
It's hard to tell without you learning what I learned. What I'm telling you is that there was a corruption; a mix up of languages at one point of history to stop people of the world from understanding each other. What's written in Matlock's book is not enough to understand as it tells a totally different story not related to languages alone. Know that there was "one" language spoken at one point and it was not Sanskrit.
ancalimonungol 3 years ago
Sanskrti is ONE of the Oldest language like Latin, Greek and else and I didn't say that Sanskrit is the ONLY oldest language, even if we trace back to history Greek, Latin, Sanskrit can't be the oldest language because there were other languages that could have been vaporized when they were updated with time. And it doesn't mean that any of these languages are the oldest. When one path is lost another opens, same thing is for the Religion and the languages !!
OSushil 3 years ago
MY BRAIN IS JUST FINE!!You should take your self out of your ignorance!!!Do not embarrass your self anymore!!!
nixter888 3 years ago
ATROPHY=ATROPHIA=ILL FED!!!
A Greek word FROM THE WORD ..TROPHY=NURTURE!!!
E?DID YOU SAY SOMETHING?
nixter888 3 years ago
You are pathetic!!!The Greeks came to you country ,and gave you knowledge!!!THEY GAVE YOU THE VEDAS!!!OIDA=KNOWLEDGE!!!
GREEKS IDIOT ARE THE OLDEST WHITE NATION OF THE WORLD!!!32.000 YEARS AGO THEY HAD THE GREATEST CIVILIZATION IN GREECE,AND THE AEGEAN!!!LEARN THE TRUTH,IGNORANTS!!!
nixter888 3 years ago
you went too far by talking about the Vedas like that. the Vedas contains chants, hymns and stories of Hinduism. Why the FUCK would you even think that the Greeks gave the Indians the Vedas. They're not even Hindu god damn it.....
kingas1992 3 years ago
The guy does not Know the word atrophy?. Another Hippie got Youtube.
emmarcee 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
THE PROTO-GREEK IS THE MOTHER LANGUAGE OF THE WORLD!!!SANSKRIT DERIVED FROM IT!!!No question about this!!!
nixter888 3 years ago
when the Indo-Aryans composed the Vedas, there were no Greeks in what is now Greece. so shut it.
iitzeus 3 years ago 3
"when the Indo-Aryans composed the Vedas, there were no Greeks in what is now Greece. so shut it."
- This is actually true. I keep hearing this same crap from an uneducated person. That all Sanskrit came from Europe, but they don't have any proof. This is a joke. They can't admit that maybe it went the other way. It was the Sanskrit speaking Indians that brought language and civilization to Europe.
tomtomttom 3 years ago 5
stop it idiot. Sanskrit was given its final form in 300 BC. now STFU. Hinduism is the favourite religion for Hippies.
emmarcee 3 years ago
emmarcee, you are talking about the standardized form of Sanskrit created by Panini. I'm talking about Sanskrit pre-Panini. Also known as Vedic. I call it Sanskrit here because most people won't know what Vedic means. I guess I should call it Vedic Sanskrit. Either way, there is no reason to call me 'idiot'. Grow up.
tomtomttom 3 years ago 3
@tomtomttom ignorance is always vain. There is a difference between Indo-Europeans and Indo-Aryans. They gave them everything, and they spread because they're the nonconformists in the Vedas. They don't have to follow wisdom; they're cool like that.
returnoftheramble 1 year ago
@returnoftheramble Actually the word Aryan never referred to a race. In Sanskrit it means noble. It was ignorant people that wanted to refer to themselves as always being noble and made it the word for their race.
tomtomttom 1 year ago
@tomtomttom I think they mean the people prior to the Indo-Europeans, nobles. The people of the region spread their knowledge northwards of farming, but the calendars seem to have come from way up north.
returnoftheramble 1 year ago
@tomtomttom there were two different races, it seems. Indo-Europeans refer to themselves as Aryans when they weren't. They came second. The Indo-Aryans or whatever they were, excuse me, possessed the knowledge first because they came up with farming and a relaxed life. There's proof. What confuses me are the dern calendars.
returnoftheramble 1 year ago
@returnoftheramble "The Indo-Aryans or whatever they were, excuse me, possessed the knowledge first because they came up with farming and a relaxed life. "
- That's true. The population that was in the subcontinent first came up with a lot of things first and the invaders from the north just took it and claimed it as their own, but their wasn't just one invasion, but numerous. In the case of the word Aryan, it means 'noble.' It never was meant to refer to a race. That came later.
tomtomttom 1 year ago
@returnoftheramble I believe the Persians were the first to refer to themselves as Aryans as a race. And later that idea spread to other parts of Asia. At least they are the first group in recorded history to claim that. Even the word Iran comes from Aryan to show pride for the Aryan race. The sad thing is before that Arya was used all over India to mean something much different, such as noble. Even today the word Arya is used to mean noble, Arya Samaj = noble society. Nothing to do with race.
tomtomttom 1 year ago
@returnoftheramble "What confuses me are the dern calendars. "
- I'm sure there were somethings the invaders brought with them. But we cant' say for sure what it was.
tomtomttom 1 year ago
@tomtomttom You know Sanskrit is very close to Russian :) In Russia there is a huge amount of names of rivers, lakes etc. and just ancient words which they are using in their speach till nowadays are pronounced in a pure Sanskrit!
tack2chin1 1 year ago
@tack2chin1 , You can say a few sentences in Sanskrit, record and upload a video here?
And I will try to understand and to tell you. I know Russian language.
VladPK11 11 months ago
@VladPK11
Tat Tvam Asi.
That Thou Are.
see the resemblance?
topbluffa1 9 months ago
@topbluffa1 ETAT TY EST (Russian). See the resemblance?
Yodovannn 8 months ago
Which planet have you been living on? The Greeks came LONG after Sanskrit was already a liturgical language.
Suki40330 3 years ago
OH YES?THIS IS WHAT THEY TOLD YOU?MYCENAEAN CIVILIZATION SINCE 12.600 B.C.!!!ARE YOU DOING THAT IN PURPOSE OR WHAT?Greek language since 32.000 years ago!!!at list!!!!Take your self out of your ignorance!!!!THE GREEK LANGUAGE AS WE KNOW IT TODAY,WITH THE SAME ALPHABET,SINCE 2000 B.C!!!OPEN YOUR EYES!!
nixter888 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Omusing darling!!!You are fake!!!Greek language is the mother language of the world!!!Put it in your mind,once and for all!!!
nixter888 3 years ago
no you are wrong
Sanskrit is the proto-indo-european language
Greek and sanskrit are considered the sister languages ...
which led to 10s of different languages
ragman2008 3 years ago 3
get a haircut and a job
ackafoo 3 years ago
Nixter's Jokes from other channels -
1> The name India is from Enis dios
2> Niyama comes from Pneuma meaning breath of god
3> Greece is 800,000 BC civilization (before Homo Erectus)!
4> Sanarana(?) Dharma = Athtanatos Dromos(Immortal Path) or Iera Odos(sacred way)
5> Mt Olympus is 115.000.000 million years old in the center of earth :) (Maybe center of universe)?
....
0musing 3 years ago
Yes idiot! indian disgrace PLAY AROUND you little games!!!of course you are going to react this way...you are in despair!...try to prove me wrong ..idiot!
nixter888 3 years ago
Aren't all these statements made by you? All these comments still exist in case you start saying you never said these things. I cannot prove that jokes are wrong!! But you prove that zeus was not a devil and greeks were not monkeys!!
0musing 3 years ago
Zeus was a mighty GOD!!!!IDIOT BOY!!!!AND THE GREEKS HIS CHILDREN!!!!GO CATCH A CHICKEN NOW!!!!OUSTTTT!!!
nixter888 3 years ago
This is no proof!! I dare you to prove that Zeus was not a devil and greeks were the monkeys who were AWOL from Lord. Rama's army..first prove this..I DARE YOU!! and what's OUSTTT? whatever, shove your oustt up your behind...
0musing 3 years ago
IF THE GOD-LOOKING GREEKS WERE MONKEYS,...what are the the Indians?...
nixter888 3 years ago
Don't change the topic. I am daring you to disprove that Zeus was a devil and greeks were the monkeys who were AWOL from Lord. Rama's army..first prove this..I DARE YOU!! and then ask me questions.
0musing 3 years ago
PROVE ME WRONG DARLING!!!!Try to prove what i am saying about the GOD-SENT GREEK language it's not true!!!!I DARE YOU!
nixter888 3 years ago
Which god are you talking about? Zeus? He was actually a devil teaching the language of hell to the monkeys who were in greece...I dare you to prove that it was not the devil!!
0musing 3 years ago
The mother of the world idiot is only GREECE!!!AND THE MOTHER LANGUAGE OF THE EARTH IS GREEK LANGUAGE!!!THE ONLY LANGUAGE!!!all the others are the corruption of GREEK!!!and that's a fact!!!!ignorants!!!!oust!!!!
nixter888 3 years ago
"The mother of the world idiot is only GREECE"...This is the first time I have this kind of statement after Saddam Hussein!! The "mother of world idiots"!! are Greeks!! Now I understand why nixter and other greeks behave like they do...
0musing 3 years ago
shut up!!!!idiot!!!go catch a chicken!!!!
nixter888 3 years ago
I think you are mistaking us for greek. We do not catch chickens...we trained the greeks to do that for us! So you go catch a chicken and bring it to me...
0musing 3 years ago
EIMAI ARXAIOLOGOS HLHTHEIE!!!=I AM AN Archaeologist IDIOT!,,,SMART ASS!!!OUST!!!!
nixter888 3 years ago
I suppose an archaelogist is also an expert in philology!! What a moron...is she arguing about old fossils or linguistic polemics?!!
0musing 3 years ago
"I AM AN Archaeologist IDIOT!" an idiot archaeologist explains the moronic behavior!!
0musing 3 years ago
Those who belonged to Vedic culture many times laugh of those people discussing on Sanskrit scripts without even theoretical knowledge of What Vedic culture means.Original name of Sanskrit is Samskrita which means purified language which have no different in north or south India.British pronounced as sanskrit and it is taken as Sanskrit whenever we are discussing it in English.Vedas are Vedas only in anywhere and everywhere.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
Even many Western Scholars will admit, the first written evidence of Sanskrit was in Brahmi Script. Where is your proof that there is older Sanskrit writing in Central Asia.
tomtomttom 4 years ago
See Edwin Bryant and David Frawley
"India was the mother of our race and Sanskrit the mother of Europe's languages. She was the mother of our philosophy, mother through the Arabs, of much of our mathematics, mother through Buddha, of the ideals embodied in Christianity, mother through village communities of self-government and democracy. Mother India is in many ways the mother of us all."
- Will Durant author, The Story of Civilization, Simon & Schuster, the Story of Philosophy, Touchstone
otrason 3 years ago
Thanks for that post otrason.
tomtomttom 3 years ago
Thanks for your comments tomtomttom. I'm the guy in the video.
otrason 3 years ago
Nice otrason. How is your Sanskrit studying coming along.
tomtomttom 3 years ago
I mean, do you even know what Sanskrit is called in South India. Some people call it Samskrit, and some people believe that was its original name and later changed by the nomads that came to North India.
tomtomttom 4 years ago
Sanskrit for Sanskrit is indeed "Samskrit," but that is attested in Sanskrit itself. It's not like South Indians have like some ancient secret, it's an accepted fact. It's only ever called Sanskrit in non-Sanskrit languages.
RolfLarsson 4 years ago
Well if you go to North India they call it Sanskrit. They even teach that in Sanskrit schools, in the North. In many South Indian Sanskrit schools they call it Samskrit. The real name of Sanskrit.
tomtomttom 4 years ago
Rolf & Tomtom, Have either of you read Stephen Oppenheimer's book "The Real Eve." He proposes that all East Asian and European peoples originated near the Indus Valley Civi. and one route was northern via Kashmir. I wonder if this sheds any light on the origin of Sanskrit. Any thoughts you might have on this will be appreciated.
PKPMom 3 years ago
I haven't read it, but I would like to. I'm not surprised by his idea. We are finding evidence that the last ice age ended around ten to twelve thousand years ago. India is right next to the equator. So the logical idea is civilizations had to start somewhere near the equator and spread as the ice melted.
tomtomttom 3 years ago
And every time they find a new Civilization, people like you, RolfLarsson have to rework your theories about India. Before Bay of Cambay everyone was saying Indian civilization was only 3,000 years old, at the oldest. Now they are changing their mind. My point is Westerns don't know, but they can't admit they don't know. They have to keep saying they somehow know the whole of Indian history. YOU DON'T KNOW.
tomtomttom 4 years ago
Or try and act like they know most of it. It is pretty arrogant of those scientist. Even today, we still don't know the history of native population of America. And we keep reworking those ideas. RolfLarsson, you don't know with certainty that Sanskrit came from Eastern Europe or Central Asia, we still need to look at the information from the Bay of Cambay.
tomtomttom 4 years ago
Yes we still do, but you're jumping to some pretty far-off conclusions, and expecting me to do the same. Yes, they found ruins in the Bay of Cambay. Does that in itself mean Sanskrit originated in India? Not at at all.
RolfLarsson 4 years ago
I still haven't seen many Western Scholars that looked into Sanskrit writing that was done research into 'Dirvidian Script'. I mean Brahmi or older Kharosti and even older scripts from that. Most Western Scholars look at Devanagari as the source of Sanskrit's age in India. Devanagari is pretty new script compared to the much older 'Darvidian' Scripts.
tomtomttom 4 years ago
It's not the age of the scripts that are in question, but the language itself. Gothic was written in a Greek-type script in the 4th century, but that doesn't mean that Gothic in its 4th century form went back as far as Greek did. It's just the script. The words themselves are important.
RolfLarsson 4 years ago
"It's not the age of the scripts that are in question, but the language itself." and how do you prove that. You can't without the written proof. And in central Asia they don't have that proof. You just make linguistic assumptions, but that isn't proof. If anything the written proof shows that Sanskrit came from India.
tomtomttom 4 years ago
RolfLarsson, you said, yourself that you don't believe it until you see the written proof of Sanskrit from the Bay of Cambay. Well you should apply that to Central Asia as well. Find proof of Sanskrit that is older than the written text in India from central Asia.
tomtomttom 4 years ago
Let's even take a look at the oldest writing about Buddha. Or even from King Ashoka's time. It was written in Sanskrit, using 'Darvidian' script. It was later written using Devanagari Script, but the first uses was in 'Darvidian' Script.
tomtomttom 4 years ago
Because the Indo-Aryans were a nomadic people, meaning they didn't have writing. It was all oral long before it was written down.
And listen, I'm not saying I know everything, I'm just saying that I have yet to see conclusive evidence supporting the idea that Vedic culture and the Sanskrit language magically originated in India.
RolfLarsson 4 years ago