@AlxInksYourBass10 Everyone is entitled to their own opinion but a lot of damage can be done when people who have no idea what they are talking about insist on having their opinions heard.
Scientists admit they know more about the moon than they know about our oceans so how can anyone possibly say with any real conviction we could catch the last fish.
This whole programme is complete fantasy and will only help destroy the lively hoods of some of the most hardworking people in society today.
@captainwull yes i think your right to take out every last blue fin tuna would be very difficult not that its the plan...as soon as hunting the fish becomes so hard that it becomes worthless to try as the cost will be so huge and majority of people just wont pay anymore except for the super rich that will no doubt pay millions for a fish there will still be bluefin swimming about saying that the stock would take a hundred years to go back even longer i asume they take a long time to grow
@1ukjunglednbraver At last someone with some common sense! Thanks for your reply to my post. I had a conversation with a guy that works on a Fishery Research ship a few weeks ago. He told me that many scientists are not interested in finding out the true state of stocks of fish, they only want to paint a black picture because the minute they say everything is fine they will have their budgets cut and many of them will be looking for jobs.
...in checking the global quota is not surpassed; however it is in the artisan fisheries where it is most difficult to hold that control. Some might say artisan fisheries do not mean a lot in the whole figure, but in a country as Peru where they mean tens of thousands of tons of hold capacity, the are a force to be taken into account. Fortunately, many of our fellow artisan fishermen in Peru are well aware of the consequences for the future and have started to care for the long-term catches :)
They are. For example in Peru, where there's a very stringent and complicated system for, first, the allocation of the global quota, then the allocation of individual quotas and then the control on the landings and actual catches. That global quota is fixed under an eco-systemic basis. Control is carried out not only by the government (as governments are easily bribed, I suppose!) but also by private companies (SGS and their likes). I understand there is some difficulty...
Yeah, do some research before commenting... Do not damn all forms of commercial fishing... there are some fisheries in the world that are totally sustainable and based on quota systems that are themselves set based on hard data by environmental agencies. DO RESEARCH. Don't just repeat what anybody says, pro or con.
Felicita...we have been commercial fishing for thousands of years. There are still fish in the sea and always will be.
We might reduce the stocks some years by overfishing but its absolutely impossible to catch the last one. They will breed and eventually restore themselves to a level that nature will allow.
really? so this doesn't make you think about the future of your grandchildren at all? I'm not a left wing hippie tree hugger. But shit like this makes you think a little.
I have been to the World Ocean Day in The Netherlands in 2009. You have NO IDEA, what the impact is of commercial fishing on ecological systems, fish/ mammals, corals, global warming, the earth....and in the end : on humans.......maybe do some more research first before commenting WHATEVER !!
This has been flagged as spam show
great miovie..one of the best that i ever watched..check this movie in webmovietube
EmileSzafranski 7 months ago
i wanna see this movie again in webmovietube
josieradomski81 1 year ago
watch complete edition of this kind of film right here in mimb o .net remove space
rupertgino1 1 year ago
@AlxInksYourBass10 Everyone is entitled to their own opinion but a lot of damage can be done when people who have no idea what they are talking about insist on having their opinions heard.
Scientists admit they know more about the moon than they know about our oceans so how can anyone possibly say with any real conviction we could catch the last fish.
This whole programme is complete fantasy and will only help destroy the lively hoods of some of the most hardworking people in society today.
captainwull 1 year ago
@captainwull yes i think your right to take out every last blue fin tuna would be very difficult not that its the plan...as soon as hunting the fish becomes so hard that it becomes worthless to try as the cost will be so huge and majority of people just wont pay anymore except for the super rich that will no doubt pay millions for a fish there will still be bluefin swimming about saying that the stock would take a hundred years to go back even longer i asume they take a long time to grow
1ukjunglednbraver 6 months ago
@1ukjunglednbraver At last someone with some common sense! Thanks for your reply to my post. I had a conversation with a guy that works on a Fishery Research ship a few weeks ago. He told me that many scientists are not interested in finding out the true state of stocks of fish, they only want to paint a black picture because the minute they say everything is fine they will have their budgets cut and many of them will be looking for jobs.
captainwull 6 months ago
...in checking the global quota is not surpassed; however it is in the artisan fisheries where it is most difficult to hold that control. Some might say artisan fisheries do not mean a lot in the whole figure, but in a country as Peru where they mean tens of thousands of tons of hold capacity, the are a force to be taken into account. Fortunately, many of our fellow artisan fishermen in Peru are well aware of the consequences for the future and have started to care for the long-term catches :)
arrielfim 1 year ago
They are. For example in Peru, where there's a very stringent and complicated system for, first, the allocation of the global quota, then the allocation of individual quotas and then the control on the landings and actual catches. That global quota is fixed under an eco-systemic basis. Control is carried out not only by the government (as governments are easily bribed, I suppose!) but also by private companies (SGS and their likes). I understand there is some difficulty...
arrielfim 1 year ago
there are more things in life than jus thinking abt seafood...dumb movie!
IowaEngineering 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yeah, do some research before commenting... Do not damn all forms of commercial fishing... there are some fisheries in the world that are totally sustainable and based on quota systems that are themselves set based on hard data by environmental agencies. DO RESEARCH. Don't just repeat what anybody says, pro or con.
arrielfim 1 year ago
Comment removed
arrielfim 1 year ago
@arrielfim yeah but the quota's have to be inforced......
creedmalbrecht 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this movie rocks! found this movie streaming in HD at newmovies(dot)com
CarolChandler011 1 year ago
STFU PEOPLE!!!
Why the Fuck should we live like people are saying to us just live your life and have fun!
W4nTeD1000 1 year ago
Felicita...we have been commercial fishing for thousands of years. There are still fish in the sea and always will be.
We might reduce the stocks some years by overfishing but its absolutely impossible to catch the last one. They will breed and eventually restore themselves to a level that nature will allow.
captainwull 1 year ago
when we burn last tree, when we drik last water and when we eat last fish, we understand that the money is not eatable- indian saying.
osunlade86 1 year ago
fo sho who gives a fuck!
garyson1000 2 years ago
OH WHATEVER!
nwjonessr 2 years ago
really? so this doesn't make you think about the future of your grandchildren at all? I'm not a left wing hippie tree hugger. But shit like this makes you think a little.
rasko67 2 years ago 2
I have been to the World Ocean Day in The Netherlands in 2009. You have NO IDEA, what the impact is of commercial fishing on ecological systems, fish/ mammals, corals, global warming, the earth....and in the end : on humans.......maybe do some more research first before commenting WHATEVER !!
felicita29 2 years ago 2