David Cameron on deporting terrorists

[johntkucz]

David Cameron reminds me a LOT of Derren Brown.

[hefeltbad]

This fuckin zionist pig is going to give more money to the real terrorist israel!!

[PoLiTiCiAnRaTeR]

view the video on my channel it is about david cameron it is soo funny :)

[whereismybailouttv]

If the govt. stopped outsourcing torture and pulled out of Afghanistan, then maybe you'd have fewer terrorists? Just a thought, Mr. Cameron.

[daryl4classic]

Why should our taxes go to deporting these people whena rope to hang them with is so much cheaper? Bring back the death penalty.

[LeysYboy]

@daryl4classic

are you an idot? capital punishment doesnt work. Countless evidence has been shown to prove this.

perhaps if we didnt want terrorism to happen, we should look atthecause, which tbh is compleatly england and americas forienge polocy. there wouldnt be anyone willing to commit jihad, unless there was actuall some reason. A terrorist to one man, is a freedom fighterto another, just like theIRA

[daryl4classic]

@LeysYboy I don't really care if it reduces the crime rate, I think they should be killed in revenge. If some tosser killed a close relative you would wnt to kill them ouldn't you?

[LeysYboy]

@daryl4classic

Not really, mabey bush and blair, david milliband, jack straw and Lord Goldsmith should be executed in revenge, for over one million civillian deaths that they have caused in a war of aggression. Also we have caused terrorism, its not like wer blameless, you dont hear about terrorist attacks in Poland or Ibeza do you? you know why that is?, its because theydont use the army and UN for Neo con aims

[daryl4classic]

@LeysYboy are you saying if i killed your mother, you wouldn't want me dead?

[LeysYboy]

@daryl4classic

that goes both ways, if id killed your mother uncle, brother and mother wouldnt you think you were justified in killing me?

[daryl4classic]

@LeysYboy well duh, i'm asking you since ur anti-death penalty, so if i killed ur mother you would think i would still be allowed to live.

[LeysYboy]

@daryl4classic

well in that case you belive Blair, Bush, Milliband, Goldsmith, Cheney and Rumsfield should be executed then. N as long as you were in prison for the rest of ur life, id like to think i wouldnt want you killed

[daryl4classic]

@LeysYboy then you must truly hate your mother, i wouldn't be happy knowing her killer would be in prison with free meals and no taxes for life. Also, i don't care abaout cheyney etc thoug i think blair and brown should be executed for treason.

[LeysYboy]

@daryl4classic

i dont hate my mother, i just think that capital punishment doesnt work. in fact its not just my opinion, its been proven. Plus are you really telling me that if we did execute people, that some innocents wouldnt get killed due to a lynch mob approach?

[daryl4classic]

@LeysYboy no there won't be lynch mobs becaus there will still be law and order, it wont be chaos.

[LeysYboy]

@daryl4classic

No lynch mob, is an expression used when people wont get a fair trial for some reason. Possibly due to them being acussed of commiting crimes that people feel strongly about, such a pedophilla rape n terrorism. due to popurlist tabloids like the sun, the accused dont get a fair trial. all im saying is innocents will be exucted if capital punishment is brought in. Plus all life is inviolate, no one has the right to take it, even the goverment.

[daryl4classic]

@LeysYboy so a murderer has a right to live even after he's just killed someone? I don't want my tax money spent on keeping killers and peado's alive.

[LeysYboy]

@daryl4classic you keep resorting to the same argument you just presented rarther than actually come up with a counter argument for my ones. I am saying that people wont geta fair trial in certain cases n innocent people may be executed. also that the goverment will use it to execute so called 'terrorist' politicing the use of execution. heres another argument aswell, if we kill people we are guilty of the same crime thattheyare justice should be better than criminals rarther than barbaric.

[daryl4classic]

@LeysYboy the argument is not complicated. It simply comes down to revenge and getting rid of scum, humane or not.

[LeysYboy]

@daryl4classic So you think we should live in a place that dictates policy on revenge. why dont we invade germany then, n massacre them? or nuke the middle east cos of a few 'terrorist'. actually we already do torture, kill n kidnapp in the middle east so guess the gov agrees with you,but then again it doesnt really work out well does it we have more terrorist than ever.

[daryl4classic]

@LeysYboy mg you really are an idiot. If, say, a white man stabs a black man, you dont kill ever wite man in revenge, just that 1. War is a different matter. I can tell from the way you keep going on about torture etc that you're some jumped up little lefty hippie fella who hates hates this country but yet doesnt want to fuck off.

[LeysYboy]

@daryl4classic wow im an idiot, says the man, who belives that despite it not working; we should still execute people for revenge. How so is war a different matter? i belive said we should execute all 'terrorists', and we are in a war on terror arnt we? or for that matter a war on drugs. besides as i havealready pointed out, we did start killing them first, so surely they should execute us? which they did in a form thru 911 ect. so according to your argument terrorists are in theright?

[daryl4classic]

@LeysYboy OMG when did I say terrorists where right? I want the idiots killed. Let me make it simple for you, and dont reply, im bored of you:

1- Murderers, peadophiles etc will be killed if proven with DNA evidence

2- This puts the victims rights before the criminals

3- This saves money as £200+ a week wont be spent keepin them alive

4- This means violent criminals aren't realeased early through overcrowding/cost

5- This means society has less scum and more hard working people

[LeysYboy]

@daryl4classic No u did just justify terrorism, in fact went even further you said they were morally right. You said that if someone kills someone close tou, uhave theright to do it back to them. bascilly two wrongs make a right. therfor since we started killing them first (undisuptadly), they have the right to kill us back. So u justified terrorism idiot

[daryl4classic]

@LeysYboy You're boring me. I'm talking about crime in the UK and I'm not interested in any idiots comparison of Ian huntley to governments. That isn't murder whts gone on in the middle east, it would be, if can be proven, a war crime. That is a different things altogether. Dont reply you dullard.

[CULAVE]

Cameron is completely right but I would go further. The key priority for any government is the security of its people. So if the decision is deporting someone who may be tortured or allowing that person to stay knowing full well they are dangerous to our national security, the priority must be the latter. This is not advocating torture- major pressure can still be put on those countries using torture to use different methods.

[kahuna390]

im not a conservative but cameron is right. we need to set up a policy where we can deport them despite the consequences. it must be up to the individual to think about what they have done and what the consequences for their actions. if someone wants to cause pain to our country then he must face the consequences even if they are not from us.

[bommmmmmmm]

Good old Dav. All things to all people (just as anyone is in opposition). My gut feeling on the guy is that he is a smug slug.

[Couerdelion73]

CMD does a nice line in 'commonsense' when in opposition. Just like Boris.

If anyone thinks this professinal liar is going to do anything about the EU HRA, the Lisbon Constitution, immigration or any other issue concerning the British people, they are deluded.

Before he got popular, Dave was urging the British (English) to be more like the Asians. He is as much an appeaser and traitor as any nu-lab drone. Worse really, as he wraps himself in the Union Jack while screwing his own people. Twat.

[SomewhereInTime226]

Torture? Death? Human rights? So what about the rights of the people they were conspiring to kill, presumably by suicide bombing?