also, signs do not all cover a month, some signs, like libra and aries, are very small (closer to 20 days then 30 of alignment with the sun) while others like virgo and pisces are huge (closer to 40 then 30...)
btw, it seems to be that the problem is that the traditional calculations aren't considering the fact that the sun is also moving, so the calculations are talking about something like a 2000 year old sky...
if you're interested in astrology, you probably heard people saying we're entering the era of aquarius, well this idea of an era implies that the sun is moving...
also, signs do not all cover a month, some signs, like libra and aries, are very small (closer to 20 days then 30 of alignment with the sun) while others like virgo and pisces are huge (closer to 40 then 30...)
chromaphone 1 year ago
thank you
never thought of this stuff before
until now
backwoodsgps 1 year ago
@backwoodsgps 1 sec ago you're welcome! :)
btw, it seems to be that the problem is that the traditional calculations aren't considering the fact that the sun is also moving, so the calculations are talking about something like a 2000 year old sky...
if you're interested in astrology, you probably heard people saying we're entering the era of aquarius, well this idea of an era implies that the sun is moving...
chromaphone 1 year ago