You bike heads keep going on about the difference in cost and traction ect. So what??This was a race to see who was the FASTEST IN A STRAIGHT LINE and the F1 smashed it.
La transferencia de potencia a la ruedas en el F1 es sensacional. Aún así la salida inicial los primeros 2 segundos son de la moto, luego los caballos de fuerza (HP) empiezan a pesar mucho.
Kinda a pointless race, neither of them are drag vehicles. Rather seem them going around the track even the F-1 car will win. It'd be more interesting and entertaining.
oops my bad, the bike is an M1 not an R1 :) But still, it's surprising how poorly the F1 did in comparison imo. Bikes are huge bang for the buck. Cars suck ass.
You can buy a used R1 with custom map that will perform like this for about $7000 CDN. The F1 car probably costs at least a million. The bike wins by a factor of 143x in my mind.
its a yamaha yzf m1 motogp bike and would cost nearly 1 million pounds not dollars and an f1 car about $6,868,000 so yeah the bike does well compared to the amount of money put into an f1 car.
What about the length added and the numerous other mods. Face it. Bikes might be fast. But, they suck ass. Driving in the rain. And every bike looks about the same 600cc to 1100 cc. No variation stupid to drive around populated areas. I can't see why people like it. If you want a rush get into a sport.
Factor the weight genius. Besides it's not contact that slows it down. It's weight and length. Man why do I try to explain this to bikers. They are all too stupid to understand.
Shame it was a wet track.
theduderwiggysan 1 month ago
the yamaha moto gp bike back then was no where nere as fast as the honda rc211v
francine2414 2 years ago
You bike heads keep going on about the difference in cost and traction ect. So what??This was a race to see who was the FASTEST IN A STRAIGHT LINE and the F1 smashed it.
danos8383 2 years ago
this was 1/4 mile wasnt it??
yomonstruo 2 years ago
The tags should read f1 vs motogp or bike.
tensecondcar 4 years ago
Cuantos metros corrieron?? si alguien entiende japones?
zyllyon 5 years ago
La transferencia de potencia a la ruedas en el F1 es sensacional. Aún así la salida inicial los primeros 2 segundos son de la moto, luego los caballos de fuerza (HP) empiezan a pesar mucho.
Pablitchus 5 years ago
Kinda a pointless race, neither of them are drag vehicles. Rather seem them going around the track even the F-1 car will win. It'd be more interesting and entertaining.
LiViNsEasy 5 years ago
woops, it's an M1 not an R1. Still, the argument still stands. Cars suck.
coteesh 5 years ago
oops my bad, the bike is an M1 not an R1 :) But still, it's surprising how poorly the F1 did in comparison imo. Bikes are huge bang for the buck. Cars suck ass.
coteesh 5 years ago
You can buy a used R1 with custom map that will perform like this for about $7000 CDN. The F1 car probably costs at least a million. The bike wins by a factor of 143x in my mind.
coteesh 5 years ago
you're such an ignorant, the best bike in the world would never beat the worst f-1 in the world
dario272 5 years ago
its a yamaha yzf m1 motogp bike and would cost nearly 1 million pounds not dollars and an f1 car about $6,868,000 so yeah the bike does well compared to the amount of money put into an f1 car.
roach308 4 years ago
What about the length added and the numerous other mods. Face it. Bikes might be fast. But, they suck ass. Driving in the rain. And every bike looks about the same 600cc to 1100 cc. No variation stupid to drive around populated areas. I can't see why people like it. If you want a rush get into a sport.
hercules71185 3 years ago
Look at the contact patch difference.
MrLesbian 5 years ago
Factor the weight genius. Besides it's not contact that slows it down. It's weight and length. Man why do I try to explain this to bikers. They are all too stupid to understand.
hercules71185 3 years ago
and the GP bike is how much ceaper? ace video
BossStrifeGixxer 5 years ago
carz rule
focijohn 5 years ago
Awesome! in my case they both won!
jusb3 5 years ago