Can someone help explain the concept of where a volt comes from? I did my best to follow his explanation but when he started doing all the math and everything else I lost it. Just a conceptual understanding is what I'm asking cause right now that's a huge block in my way to moving onto other E&M concepts. Thanks
Thank you Walter Lewin! Voltage was presented to me very vaguely and as a concept I should accept on face value, I appreciate it being explained from first principles and then named at the end of the process. That is real teaching.
@dimpubeckylu The charge is pushing back Walter. Therefore he has to do work to overcome this. The force he needs to overcome the charge is arbitrarily greater than the charge's force. If you make an analogy with gravity, it is easier.
@dimpubeckylu Lift an object of mass m a height h above the ground. The work done by you, in lifting that object will be mgh, where g = gravitational acceleration. This is more intuitive to us. Once you match gravity, all you need to do is be just, just stronger.
I dont understand the light experiments in the end...For electrons to flow, doesn't there always have to be a loop? How can the electrons be flowing infinitely into one direction, wouldnt they be depleted at some point? And how can the electrons flow through the Professors body into the ground, when I dont see a way where they can flow back from the other side?
@moritzkremb think non restrictive. You don't need a circuit for electrons, you just need positive, and negative charges. Electrons flow thru these charges, until there is no tension drop, or potential difference between them. I suppose you know this already. Imagine that negative and positive charges "float" thru the air. Because of this, when a negative, or positive charge is created, it will always find another complementary charge to wich it will discharge.Such charges exist everywhere
@moritzkremb every molecule has charges, that's why electrons seem to travel indefinetly, when they are just closing a gap between 2 points. Same with the electrons traveling to the ground, the earth's core being a magnetic field generator it is the biggest generator you can have at the moment, every charge on Earth's surface, and close to it, will TEND to discharge towards it, unless it has somewhere better/closer to discharge it its vicinity. I cannot properly explain this to you
@moritzkremb it is alien for me to explain physics in english, because western conventions differ from eastern ones, and simply because of the language barrier present when trying to explain something somewhat complex, yet simple
Finally one professor that asks himself directly WHY they put the potential as Vb-Va with a minus on the integral. I mean, it's taken not as the work made by the electric field, but the work made by an external force that has the same magnitude but opposite direction... but at the end what's the difference? It's confusing sometimes. You've said it Walter, for reasons you don't understand yet ;)
Potential work in electrostatic field is a static figure. It's "conservative" for STATIC, "zero-duration periods", when no move nor event modifies the field! Can't move real charge statically (i.e. without changing rest of the e-field). Potential work can be "conservative". Work in dynamic field -not! So work depend of the path and events. In real world we can achieve the same point doing different amounts of work. The same for gravity. Free energy!
@digicho whoa, wait. "Can't move real charge statically (i.e. without changing rest of the e-field)", a charge doesn't feel its own field! The total field changes, but the charge only feels the field from other charges.
"In real world we can achieve the same point doing different amounts of work." Example please!
@MaximPodolsky U r talking about movement through e-field frozen in time. It's not real. Moving charge changes its field, field changes position of near charges, they change their influence on our charge and so on. Moving means dynamic not static. Moving of charge is dynamically not conservative. So concept of work (moving from infinity) in static e-field is simplified or ill-defined.
Example: work depends on path in non-conservative field -> go to lecture 16 of Lewin /watch?v=G3eI4SVDyME
I'm so glad I found these lectures. My professor for 1B at UCLA sucks! Nothing but derivations. And I like that I finally have something to compliment the book. Thank you MIT!
he said that he has already discussed it in previous lecture ... explanation is easy... inside the sphere E=0 so it means that there is no force, if there is no force so u can rest inside... even if you have a little charge in your pocket and you walk there you don't feel any force, so if you don't feel any force you don't do any work if you don't do any work potential every where inside must be constant :) work = q*(Vb-Va)
Energy sources without the need for fuel or energy input exist ,But the Big corporations spend millions to ensure that information does not spread to the masses,Get a motor that works with the power of magnets only at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Big change is comming soon!
these 4 first lectures are really boring and not getting to me , I have to watch this 3 times over to get to grips of whats he talking about , are they really that necessary to understand the basics of Tesla ?
I cannot wait till I assimilated this well enough to move towards impedance and circuit analysis type of things .
I am taking General Physics II, as it is called in my school, this semester. Thanks to professor Walter Lewin, I am able to understand the basic concept of the material. Physics always creats panic and tension in me, but the lectures are making me love it. Thanks MIT for making these lectures available on you tube. Profesor WL, thanks again for making physics come to life.
we use a g Greek letter φ for electric potential and V for voltage, and voltage is difference in potentials so V= φ1 - φ2...and how some charges can have negative energy???
@otTbc123 Actuallly,Potential is related to the work to move a "Positive" test charge. so imagine if you had to move a negative charge towards a positive charge. Obviously, you wouldn't have to put energy in the system to do that work, since the two charges are attracted by each other. In that case the system is giving YOU energy.
Saw many people ask this so I figured I would help - It doesn't matter which way the electrons go, the tube would still light up! Positive or negative, its all just convention.
If I call something positive, and it attracts something else, then that automatically becomes negative, because two identicals of my original object happen to repel.
@wittvk I think that when the electrons move, the gas got into an excited state and release photons (which gives us light), and then they become normal again
Hehh....I love these lectures. The only annoying thing is that they pan to random students' faces when he's talking. I DON'T WANNA LOOK AT YOUR MUG FOO!
hey when he places that gas tube parallel to the field lines with the vandergraph switched on,can someone please explain why the electrons within the tube are said to travel from higher potential to lower potential (left to right) because i thought the opposite was true.
they go from high to low cause all things want to be at rest
newton's first law ... it want's to maintain a balence same is true for air pressure High pressure flows into Low never from low to high cause it want's to be at rest or balence not be forced into a situatuion where overall work is increased just remember newton's first law inertia and it all makes sence
you thought right, (29:09) in fact the electrons moved from lower potential to higher. The potential caused by a charge: V=Q/4pi epsilon0 r, so if Q is negative so is the potential. Thus the farther you are, the higher the potential. So electrons want to move farther. But you can clearly see it if you consider the forces not potentials...
Very very good. Much better explanation that both of my textbooks (Young & Freedman and Purcell).
The only ANNOYING thing is all of the sudden a student's face is shown. Why?!! It bothers the HECK out of me! I'm trying to pay attention to the instructor not to the surroundings. Very distracting way to film the lecture.
So Voltaire erred, and the result was we ended up with the incredibly complex electrical theories of today -- they hamper true understanding and progress. We should define resistance as (v.max - v.min) / ( vmax + vmin) -- where v is velocity of the electron front in the CSA.
This then makes mv-squared, in this case Rv-squed, equal to power. I am sure you will all see this is a more advanced system because simpler and easier to use. I hope many work on the theory independently of each other.
Perhaps if the metal of the vdg globe were thin enough and the room was made sufficiently dark such non conductive optical equipment as i've described could record the position of the sparks on the outside of the globe and also simultaneously observe and or record any phenomona on the opposite side of the globe from each spark ? or " on the axis " ? more or less ? every action has an equal and opposite reaction ?
At 21:21, to me the shape looks like a lightbulb. Where the electric field is zero there is a mobius strip that serves as a little reminder that there is infinite energy available for free. The green and red colors correspond to christmas and remind me that free energy is the ultimate gift TO BE GIVEN to humanity. Long live Nikola Tesla!
Might it be possible with the advent of fiber optics and very small cameras to place a device inside what has always traditionally been the " hollow" sphere of a van de graff generator such that "observations" could be made of the interior of the sphere whilst the sparks are jumping on the outside ? Perhaps there might be something interesting or worth observing , if not with optical equipment then perhaps with some other measuring apparatus ?
The fwl integral is equal to the fel integral because of conservation of energy; energy he puts in by pushing one charge toward the other is the same as the as the energy used by the electrical charges to push away. Then, because the force vector Fel and vector dr are parallel the dot product is just multiplication (cos(0) = 1). Next he uses Coulomb's law (F = (q1*q2)/(r^2*4pi*e) to substitute for Fel in the integral. Take out the constant term (q1*q2)/(4pi*e) and integrate dr/r^2.
what amazes me more then anything about magnetic fields is. It is theoretically possible to detect all other things in the universe, if you have the right tools. It the field is able to be detected up to infinity. Then you should be able to have a magnetics field in mars and be able to detect it on earth providing that you can filter out the other changes and are able to detect it.
If the net force on an object is zero, its velocity is constant. The acceleration is zero, but the velocity can be nonzero. So Fwl is the force needed to keep the object moving at constant velocity.
well if its a dot then you are calculting a line integral. either way you get same result, its the secret behind comnsecutive forces and line integral. u can find free e book abouit it.
@Zetimenvec the dot between the E and dr means you use the dot product which is E x dr x cos θ (where θ is the angle between the two vectors E & dr) but in that instance E & dr are parallel so cos θ = 1 so you ignore it
I always understood that we choose the 0 of potential. That any particular reigon is not confined to have any particular potential like he said, but instead it is the change of potential that is meaningful... Loved the lecture though
This professor isn't typical for USA, infact if you look at most lectures, they cannot compare with this person. It is not the University, nor the country, but more so the person, this one in particular is special.
Sweet.....so much better than QUT first year physics....! he just makes it interesting instead of throwing tones of formulea down ur neck!....fantastic
this profesor is awasome. he's smart, and extremelly funny which in turns keeps the audience stuck and on track to the subject. I really enjoy watching this vdieo plus brings me back old mmemories when I went to college. I'm not an MIT graduate. but go MIT!!!
unfortuntely, not every college professor is as clear as he is......I guess that's why they charge $35,000 /year at MIT...good thing I get listen to his lecture for free. =)
Where does the charge needed for the current that lights up the fluorescent bulb come from, since there are no wires? And where does the charge escape from the farther end of the bulb?
the whole concept is that when there is a differnce in "potential electric energy"
electrons will automatically flow from lower potential place to the higher one .
of course, if you ground 1 end of the light, the electrons will be able to flow MUCH MORE FREELY and therefore will create a much brighter light. otherwise, electrons can still escape thru the AIR. (just not as quick)
Giancoli, D. C. Physics for Scientists & Engineers. Vol. 2. Prentice Hall aka screened and approved by government persons to make sure it doesn't teach too much!
around 14:50 i'm not sure what he says "lobby 7?" and i can't read what's on the board because the quality of the video makes it a little blurry. can someone clarify that? if it was lobby 7, what does that mean?
47:42 : "and then, if I feel very good, I will do that again" - priceless face
z0il 4 weeks ago 2
Can someone help explain the concept of where a volt comes from? I did my best to follow his explanation but when he started doing all the math and everything else I lost it. Just a conceptual understanding is what I'm asking cause right now that's a huge block in my way to moving onto other E&M concepts. Thanks
ZackFair524 1 month ago
This video is a favorite on Tbilisi
chesterlott821 1 month ago
hiya ich bin total naja wie soll ich sagen reich
OdaHanadw389 1 month ago
Thank you Walter Lewin! Voltage was presented to me very vaguely and as a concept I should accept on face value, I appreciate it being explained from first principles and then named at the end of the process. That is real teaching.
EclecticSceptic 1 month ago
genius@@
walter levin
adirajuadithya 2 months ago
lol...Walter Lewin force F WL
foxconcept 2 months ago in playlist More videos from MIT
the camera man picks the good-looking students
LegIsLate 3 months ago
the resolution is low... bt walter lewin is worth it.
Thebuterflygurl 3 months ago 3
but if the work done by Walter and the electric feild are same then how is it possible to bring the charge closer to q1
dimpubeckylu 4 months ago
@dimpubeckylu The charge is pushing back Walter. Therefore he has to do work to overcome this. The force he needs to overcome the charge is arbitrarily greater than the charge's force. If you make an analogy with gravity, it is easier.
EclecticSceptic 1 month ago
@dimpubeckylu Lift an object of mass m a height h above the ground. The work done by you, in lifting that object will be mgh, where g = gravitational acceleration. This is more intuitive to us. Once you match gravity, all you need to do is be just, just stronger.
EclecticSceptic 1 month ago
I dont understand the light experiments in the end...For electrons to flow, doesn't there always have to be a loop? How can the electrons be flowing infinitely into one direction, wouldnt they be depleted at some point? And how can the electrons flow through the Professors body into the ground, when I dont see a way where they can flow back from the other side?
moritzkremb 4 months ago
@moritzkremb think non restrictive. You don't need a circuit for electrons, you just need positive, and negative charges. Electrons flow thru these charges, until there is no tension drop, or potential difference between them. I suppose you know this already. Imagine that negative and positive charges "float" thru the air. Because of this, when a negative, or positive charge is created, it will always find another complementary charge to wich it will discharge.Such charges exist everywhere
Maelkenar 3 months ago
@moritzkremb every molecule has charges, that's why electrons seem to travel indefinetly, when they are just closing a gap between 2 points. Same with the electrons traveling to the ground, the earth's core being a magnetic field generator it is the biggest generator you can have at the moment, every charge on Earth's surface, and close to it, will TEND to discharge towards it, unless it has somewhere better/closer to discharge it its vicinity. I cannot properly explain this to you
Maelkenar 3 months ago
@moritzkremb it is alien for me to explain physics in english, because western conventions differ from eastern ones, and simply because of the language barrier present when trying to explain something somewhat complex, yet simple
Maelkenar 3 months ago
the best teacher of the century! thank you so much, really
danish2baswal 5 months ago
amazing teacher,u learn even more when u see ur teacher so dedicated........ :)
devyanishrm 5 months ago in playlist Walter Lewin - Physics
Muy bueno.. lo vi muy bien representado..! excelente clase.! como se llama el profesor?¿
che517 6 months ago
Professor Lewin has a NEW BOOK OUT........get it while its hot.....
LV07TSK 7 months ago
Finally one professor that asks himself directly WHY they put the potential as Vb-Va with a minus on the integral. I mean, it's taken not as the work made by the electric field, but the work made by an external force that has the same magnitude but opposite direction... but at the end what's the difference? It's confusing sometimes. You've said it Walter, for reasons you don't understand yet ;)
death666label 9 months ago
I love these chalkboards. So amazing. ^-^
Zeykieee 9 months ago
@Zeykieee
Heh yes they mesmerize me every time with their complex positioning systems.
LegendLength 9 months ago
genius
Osman9100 10 months ago
The girl on 4:54 is so damn pretty!
lthroy 10 months ago
@lthroy She sure is! :)
EdEditz 10 months ago
@lthroy we can make a fan club :D
BeLieVeR11111 8 months ago
He sounds like he is a countryman of mine. Dutch that is.
EdEditz 10 months ago
@EdEditz yup...he is a dutch....i heard him say in one of his lectures...!
nikki0mitra 10 months ago
@nikki0mitra Cool! :) Thanks ^^
EdEditz 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE watch my video on the Electrinium battery.
electricitymagnetism 11 months ago
21:35, where the heck did he take that ballon from???
GregTom2 1 year ago
OMG, interactive transcript is so awesome. check it out right under the video next to the description.
MenialWitnesl1l 1 year ago 6
electric potential energy= q1q2/d^2 times kc
junior1984able 1 year ago
36:48 hey baby, why dont we go release some potential energy? lol
AvatarOfGames 1 year ago
In 5:50 doc's not speaking the whole truth.
Potential work in electrostatic field is a static figure. It's "conservative" for STATIC, "zero-duration periods", when no move nor event modifies the field! Can't move real charge statically (i.e. without changing rest of the e-field). Potential work can be "conservative". Work in dynamic field -not! So work depend of the path and events. In real world we can achieve the same point doing different amounts of work. The same for gravity. Free energy!
digicho 1 year ago
@digicho whoa, wait. "Can't move real charge statically (i.e. without changing rest of the e-field)", a charge doesn't feel its own field! The total field changes, but the charge only feels the field from other charges.
"In real world we can achieve the same point doing different amounts of work." Example please!
MaximPodolsky 1 year ago
@MaximPodolsky U r talking about movement through e-field frozen in time. It's not real. Moving charge changes its field, field changes position of near charges, they change their influence on our charge and so on. Moving means dynamic not static. Moving of charge is dynamically not conservative. So concept of work (moving from infinity) in static e-field is simplified or ill-defined.
Example: work depends on path in non-conservative field -> go to lecture 16 of Lewin /watch?v=G3eI4SVDyME
digicho 11 months ago
@digicho u jelly physics? trololol
yrsnkd 11 months ago
MIT is MIT, actually !
dfnmartins 1 year ago
I'm so glad I found these lectures. My professor for 1B at UCLA sucks! Nothing but derivations. And I like that I finally have something to compliment the book. Thank you MIT!
DormRoomMonkey 1 year ago
he said that he has already discussed it in previous lecture ... explanation is easy... inside the sphere E=0 so it means that there is no force, if there is no force so u can rest inside... even if you have a little charge in your pocket and you walk there you don't feel any force, so if you don't feel any force you don't do any work if you don't do any work potential every where inside must be constant :) work = q*(Vb-Va)
zulek87 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Energy sources without the need for fuel or energy input exist ,But the Big corporations spend millions to ensure that information does not spread to the masses,Get a motor that works with the power of magnets only at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Big change is comming soon!
hungarylnnjsd 1 year ago
he never explains why electric potential when r<R is constant n maximum. around 11:30mins
143mounica 1 year ago
he never explains why electric potential when r<R is constant n maximum
143mounica 1 year ago
If he was my teacher when I was young, I would have a much better job now ;)
woodydrn2 1 year ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
The Oil companies are trying their best to stop free energy ideas from spreading to common people.
We need to put an end to this corruption ,start generating your own electricity now.
Look for the LT MAGNET MOTOR in youtube video search. Join the Revolution!!
faerydhhlo 1 year ago
teaching genius
JDBolt1958 1 year ago
genius
JDBolt1958 1 year ago
these 4 first lectures are really boring and not getting to me , I have to watch this 3 times over to get to grips of whats he talking about , are they really that necessary to understand the basics of Tesla ?
I cannot wait till I assimilated this well enough to move towards impedance and circuit analysis type of things .
dankiewfc 1 year ago
I am taking General Physics II, as it is called in my school, this semester. Thanks to professor Walter Lewin, I am able to understand the basic concept of the material. Physics always creats panic and tension in me, but the lectures are making me love it. Thanks MIT for making these lectures available on you tube. Profesor WL, thanks again for making physics come to life.
abelgz 1 year ago 3
I like this guy he reminds me off Doc in the movie "Back to the Future"
whiterican74 1 year ago 3
Comment removed
otTbc123 1 year ago
we use a g Greek letter φ for electric potential and V for voltage, and voltage is difference in potentials so V= φ1 - φ2...and how some charges can have negative energy???
otTbc123 1 year ago
@otTbc123 Actuallly,Potential is related to the work to move a "Positive" test charge. so imagine if you had to move a negative charge towards a positive charge. Obviously, you wouldn't have to put energy in the system to do that work, since the two charges are attracted by each other. In that case the system is giving YOU energy.
endothermique 1 year ago
@endothermique thanks,it was very helpful;
otTbc123 1 year ago
Comment removed
otTbc123 1 year ago
@otTbc123 too bad 4 u
farestabs 1 year ago
Saw many people ask this so I figured I would help - It doesn't matter which way the electrons go, the tube would still light up! Positive or negative, its all just convention.
If I call something positive, and it attracts something else, then that automatically becomes negative, because two identicals of my original object happen to repel.
Angadude 1 year ago
I don't understand a little bit at last experiment with neon tube.
If we make a constant flow of electrons in neon tube - then
electrons constantly appear at one end of tube and dissapear at other end.
Where from they come and where they go?
From air?
If so - then air is also have ionized with one charge near vandergraph,
and other charge farther away?
And what happens if we shut down vandergraph? Another flow of electrons
that restore charge balance of air?
wittvk 1 year ago
@wittvk I think that when the electrons move, the gas got into an excited state and release photons (which gives us light), and then they become normal again
Ziacer 1 year ago
11:11 is kind of impressive
feinsteing 1 year ago
Hehh....I love these lectures. The only annoying thing is that they pan to random students' faces when he's talking. I DON'T WANNA LOOK AT YOUR MUG FOO!
AgentChaos1337 1 year ago 62
@AgentChaos1337 some of them poking their noses lol
djpatonics 6 months ago in playlist Electricity/ Electric field/ Circuits
this has implications on the orbital elevator. Half the challenge is getting above 20 miles. Then it gets much easier im thinking.
azezel2311 2 years ago
Oh, and these video lectures are AWESOME since my high school teacher sucks at teaching...
Goatseeee 2 years ago 22
@Goatseeee It doesn't get any better in college (unless you are at MIT, of course)
xenoepist 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
excellent work!
1888junkteam 2 years ago
lol he calls his force Fwl^^
Tyrann90 2 years ago
If one knows everything, then what must one have to know ? These calculations are hard to understand , i am just too ignorant :)
dan020350 2 years ago
free education bootleg from universities so we don't have to pay tution anymore ?
dan020350 2 years ago
easy to understand awesome lectures
ive never seen a professor like him.....
hezzzz great ...................
tributes to him
Koolafeer 2 years ago
ONE word for Prof.Walter Lewin : AWESOME!!!!
nit323 2 years ago 4
not that im saying american education is bad.. infact, his traditional way of teaching is so much more easier to absorb than prepared slides
purememory 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
in asia, this is learnt in grade 11... i wonder which is better.. learning everything at rapid pace or slow paced learning like america's...
purememory 2 years ago
In college, they always assume you haven't learned anything and teach it all over again.
PentagramSchematic 2 years ago
@purememory not suprised, u guys r like 19 by that time lol
pLaSmAGrEEn 2 years ago
not surprised abt what exactly?
n wow i was shocked at the number of 'thumbs down ' my comment had. what i wanted to say was that i myself prefer relaxed american education system.
purememory 2 years ago
@purememory u shouldve made it more clear ..... lol
and in which case then i agree w/ u
pLaSmAGrEEn 2 years ago
aren't u guys 19 by the time u enter uni?
purememory 2 years ago
@purememory
no, we're usually 18
Goatseeee 2 years ago
well, thats 19 in some asian countries cuz we count extra year u spend in ur mother's womb.
purememory 2 years ago
@purememory 18 is normal here
pLaSmAGrEEn 2 years ago
yeah 18 is the normal age for universities for most countries not just USA, unless u r a guy n have to serve national service at age 18.
purememory 2 years ago
@purememory ohhhhh kool
pLaSmAGrEEn 2 years ago
@purememory 18 or 19 usually
darkoriginhunter 1 year ago
hey when he places that gas tube parallel to the field lines with the vandergraph switched on,can someone please explain why the electrons within the tube are said to travel from higher potential to lower potential (left to right) because i thought the opposite was true.
dafatabacata 2 years ago
they go from high to low cause all things want to be at rest
newton's first law ... it want's to maintain a balence same is true for air pressure High pressure flows into Low never from low to high cause it want's to be at rest or balence not be forced into a situatuion where overall work is increased just remember newton's first law inertia and it all makes sence
forgive the spelling hope it helped
Rastamanchanter 2 years ago
dont listen to Rastamanchanter's baloney...
you thought right, (29:09) in fact the electrons moved from lower potential to higher. The potential caused by a charge: V=Q/4pi epsilon0 r, so if Q is negative so is the potential. Thus the farther you are, the higher the potential. So electrons want to move farther. But you can clearly see it if you consider the forces not potentials...
ofey137 2 years ago
u can download his lectures from itunes u for free
mryahooshah 2 years ago
I love his lectures. He goes into much more detail than I'm taught in my lectures and still it is so much easier to understand.
helenbask 2 years ago 4
Very very good. Much better explanation that both of my textbooks (Young & Freedman and Purcell).
The only ANNOYING thing is all of the sudden a student's face is shown. Why?!! It bothers the HECK out of me! I'm trying to pay attention to the instructor not to the surroundings. Very distracting way to film the lecture.
Overall, awesome. Thanks for the vid MIT.
esquadmiller 2 years ago
I agree. Please keep the camera on the professor. Thanks for the good work!
errold32 2 years ago
really very helpfull!!!
astrinick 2 years ago 3
So Voltaire erred, and the result was we ended up with the incredibly complex electrical theories of today -- they hamper true understanding and progress. We should define resistance as (v.max - v.min) / ( vmax + vmin) -- where v is velocity of the electron front in the CSA.
This then makes mv-squared, in this case Rv-squed, equal to power. I am sure you will all see this is a more advanced system because simpler and easier to use. I hope many work on the theory independently of each other.
inertialcapacity 2 years ago
that because he stole the knowledge from the Egyptians and did not fully understand it ....
NoticeOfDefault 2 years ago
Clearly this isn't the best of all possible worlds...don't you mean Volta?
bushyblowfish 2 years ago
Perhaps if the metal of the vdg globe were thin enough and the room was made sufficiently dark such non conductive optical equipment as i've described could record the position of the sparks on the outside of the globe and also simultaneously observe and or record any phenomona on the opposite side of the globe from each spark ? or " on the axis " ? more or less ? every action has an equal and opposite reaction ?
srofficial06 2 years ago
The professor is really good. He knows to show all the conceps using good tools for that. (excuse me if my english isn't good)
El profesor si que es bueno, él sabe mostrar y transmitir todos los conceptos con un adecuado uso de las herramientas a su alcance.
orvallo 2 years ago 2
At 21:21, to me the shape looks like a lightbulb. Where the electric field is zero there is a mobius strip that serves as a little reminder that there is infinite energy available for free. The green and red colors correspond to christmas and remind me that free energy is the ultimate gift TO BE GIVEN to humanity. Long live Nikola Tesla!
lifeskills81 2 years ago
I though he was the scientist from back to the future!!!
Matice21 2 years ago 2
Might it be possible with the advent of fiber optics and very small cameras to place a device inside what has always traditionally been the " hollow" sphere of a van de graff generator such that "observations" could be made of the interior of the sphere whilst the sparks are jumping on the outside ? Perhaps there might be something interesting or worth observing , if not with optical equipment then perhaps with some other measuring apparatus ?
srofficial06 2 years ago
interesting question, my guess is that nothing would be going on inside of the hollow sphere as all of the charge is held on the surface.
janton08 2 years ago
what makes a school great is its professors
333irani333 2 years ago 5
really good presentation .........
rajansh2 2 years ago 3
Does anyone how he got from the integral of Fwl dot dr to q1q2/4pi*e times the integral of dr/r^2 ....Sorry I am a little confused at the derivation
HomerWells007 2 years ago
The fwl integral is equal to the fel integral because of conservation of energy; energy he puts in by pushing one charge toward the other is the same as the as the energy used by the electrical charges to push away. Then, because the force vector Fel and vector dr are parallel the dot product is just multiplication (cos(0) = 1). Next he uses Coulomb's law (F = (q1*q2)/(r^2*4pi*e) to substitute for Fel in the integral. Take out the constant term (q1*q2)/(4pi*e) and integrate dr/r^2.
janton08 2 years ago
what amazes me more then anything about magnetic fields is. It is theoretically possible to detect all other things in the universe, if you have the right tools. It the field is able to be detected up to infinity. Then you should be able to have a magnetics field in mars and be able to detect it on earth providing that you can filter out the other changes and are able to detect it.
Richardwinkel 2 years ago
Why Fwl=Fel ? if they are equal the q are in equilibrium so there is no movement; it means that W=0 ?
romanuh 2 years ago
If the net force on an object is zero, its velocity is constant. The acceleration is zero, but the velocity can be nonzero. So Fwl is the force needed to keep the object moving at constant velocity.
koningrobot 2 years ago
he makes it easy to know what lecture hes on by what kind of food is pinned to his shirt. convenient!
yamaha893 2 years ago
This guy is awesome. Makes things very clear! Not to mention he's a boss
dclair12 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is ez i got a cambradge scholaship two.,,,
AccountantX 2 years ago
He is very imediate "teacher". This is best for a physicist.
alxmagic 2 years ago 36
when he says
⌠
⌡ E dot dr
does the "dot" represent a times symbol or a period? because if it's a period, I have no idea what that means in the context of mathematics.
Zetimenvec 2 years ago
none of them, it is dot product (scalar) of vectors. you can find further info about this easily i guess.
darthelessar 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I dont usualy do this, but....pffff
alxmagic 2 years ago
dot product of two vectors = the product of their magnitudes times the cosine of the angle between them.
So, if the angle is 90 degrees, dot product is zero.
:)
symphoma 2 years ago
look it up on the internet, there are many resources to explain this =)
Dynamics18 2 years ago
well if its a dot then you are calculting a line integral. either way you get same result, its the secret behind comnsecutive forces and line integral. u can find free e book abouit it.
goodluckpeace44 2 years ago
@Zetimenvec the dot between the E and dr means you use the dot product which is E x dr x cos θ (where θ is the angle between the two vectors E & dr) but in that instance E & dr are parallel so cos θ = 1 so you ignore it
hopher10 1 year ago
The last demonstration was a good example, liked it
DexteriousDex 2 years ago
good guy
sukardihenry 2 years ago
I always understood that we choose the 0 of potential. That any particular reigon is not confined to have any particular potential like he said, but instead it is the change of potential that is meaningful... Loved the lecture though
thefullmonte03 2 years ago
Please come to Utrecht. We really really need a good professor...
pimborman 2 years ago 2
Dr. Lewin is originally from the Netherlands.
fkafka64 2 years ago 4
Strange but USA lectures I understand better(100 %) than Russian.WTF
Globalizator1 3 years ago 4
yea me too
i dont speak russian
notToast 3 years ago 8
lol
dodoshlodo 3 years ago
I'm pretty sure he's Dutch...or German...definitely not Russian
ThePrivateBenReel 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
Globalizator1 2 years ago
Comment removed
Globalizator1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Idea is that russian lecture is a crazy combination of logical connections wich is extremely hard to process.
Globalizator1 2 years ago
This professor isn't typical for USA, infact if you look at most lectures, they cannot compare with this person. It is not the University, nor the country, but more so the person, this one in particular is special.
lordennis01 2 years ago 6
Sweet.....so much better than QUT first year physics....! he just makes it interesting instead of throwing tones of formulea down ur neck!....fantastic
Resonant2Frequency 3 years ago
and how do you upload vids which over 10 minutes of length?
emptywallet 3 years ago
You have to be a Youtube partner, it was just a matter of changing a setting like a year ago. Now it's impossible as far as I know.
clerlic 3 years ago
OMG!! School in the internet!! I want to die!!!
Sixnend 3 years ago
this profesor is awasome. he's smart, and extremelly funny which in turns keeps the audience stuck and on track to the subject. I really enjoy watching this vdieo plus brings me back old mmemories when I went to college. I'm not an MIT graduate. but go MIT!!!
juanespinosarsr 3 years ago 2
Our lecturer is almost as good, except sometimes he gets excited and starts talking really fast. Also we only have maybe 2-3 demonstrations per month
clerlic 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fuck me from the ass,please i need orgasm
nural666 3 years ago
fuckign genius...w/e he said i got it instantly..holy fucking shit! FUCK HIGH SCHOOL, I MUST GET OUT OF THIS HELL HOLE!
Wuzzi55 3 years ago
unfortuntely, not every college professor is as clear as he is......I guess that's why they charge $35,000 /year at MIT...good thing I get listen to his lecture for free. =)
jplonmars 3 years ago 7
This are gr8 explanations. Amazing, MIT and this Professor owns.
juanCarlosvp7 3 years ago
This doesn't seem to be too difficult, its a simple calculus!! But I still love it.
BGasperov 3 years ago
omg he owns
simkodedon 3 years ago 2
Where does the charge needed for the current that lights up the fluorescent bulb come from, since there are no wires? And where does the charge escape from the farther end of the bulb?
MarcAntoni07 3 years ago
charges probably just build up at ends of tube. when new electric field created by that charges cancels that of vandergraff, current drops to 0.
4txx 3 years ago
you probably didn't understand the concept...
the whole concept is that when there is a differnce in "potential electric energy"
electrons will automatically flow from lower potential place to the higher one .
of course, if you ground 1 end of the light, the electrons will be able to flow MUCH MORE FREELY and therefore will create a much brighter light. otherwise, electrons can still escape thru the AIR. (just not as quick)
jplonmars 3 years ago
this...man ... is...a god in my eyes, he makes you really love science . he reminds me of one of my idols Nikolai Tesla
TIMESTREAMER12 3 years ago 3
Giancoli, D. C. Physics for Scientists & Engineers. Vol. 2. Prentice Hall aka screened and approved by government persons to make sure it doesn't teach too much!
sn1pe352 3 years ago
well said sn1pe352 -- irritating and true
NicePeopleGive 3 years ago
ok good lecture .. btw do u know what textbook the students use ? feynman maybe ?
solmyr2 3 years ago
Go to the MIT OCW website for things like this. Here is the textbook they use:
Giancoli, D. C. Physics for Scientists & Engineers. Vol. 2. Prentice Hall.
Forsaken87 3 years ago
it is very popular, i use this book, i study physics in the netherlands
xelloschan 3 years ago
simply awesome, i wish my lecturer is as good as him
harkken 3 years ago 4
excellent lecture. I love the demonstrations.
gustgr 3 years ago 2
around 14:50 i'm not sure what he says "lobby 7?" and i can't read what's on the board because the quality of the video makes it a little blurry. can someone clarify that? if it was lobby 7, what does that mean?
great lecture btw! =)
nekrataal7 3 years ago
lobby 7 is the next building over. he replied to lobby 7 as if we were at an infinite distance away from the charge
ronron858 3 years ago 4
I realy like it
azben1428 3 years ago