Added: 3 years ago
From: jontertu
Views: 6,218
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (27)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • counter-argument, counter-argument, counter-argument, counter-argument......... insult.

  • MUST HAVE BEEN AN INSIDE JOB!

  • My new company is called: Demolition by Fire Inc.

    We will specialize in steel framed building demolition. BUT unlike conventional demolition companies, our process would cost a fraction of this incredibly involved process. Using large quantities of kerosene we will create fires on various floors, starting near the top...and then watch the entire building to collapse into its own footprint at free fall speed. These guys used gasoline instead, that's why it did not fall down...idoits

  • @CVicious777

    demolitioned buildings do not fall at free fall speed. IDIOT

  • @taledarkside near free fall

  • @fulcrumpete sorry you had to deal with the ignorant idiot

  • The twin towers were hit by fully fuelled Boeing 767's flying full pelt into them, they were only built to withstand an off course, out of fuel, Boeing 707 trying to make an emergency landing in fog.

    Planes don't land at 595mph they land at very low speeds to avoid running out of runway. The crash damage on 9/11 was way beyond anything the designers had anticipated.

  • @fulcrumpete 9/11 Inside job. The towers wont collapse with a plane hitting. There were obviously bombs in every corner.

  • @gamestory13 are you for real? a fully fuelled 767 causing structural damage and at the same time setting fire to the building's contents was more than enough. The footage of the collapses show bending moments occurring in the outer skeleton in the final seconds before the upper loads drop (and not even so much as one explosive charge can be heard on any legit footage of the collapses). Wake up kid.

  • @fulcrumpete ROFL ROFL. Your brainwashed kid. That building was made by strong materials they said when they builded it, a plane wont get it down. And the people out there said. SEVERAL Explosions. 2nd tower. NO PLANE, MASSIVE EXPLOSION. Edited video's by Fox CCN <-- Jewish media

  • @gamestory13 You've a lot of growing up to do. You're like a submarine in a sea of ignorance.

    I know the sister of one of the survivors of that attack, the footage he filmed is on my page. He filmed WTC2 as it gave way. No bombs took the towers down, just pure and simple physics of steel weakening due to the fire in the building started by the burning fuel. You forget, those towers were offices, full of office materials, desks, paper plastics etc. FLAMMABLE.

  • @fulcrumpete Dude you´r just brainwashed by the ´´Sea of Jewish Media´´ Ofcourse there were bombs. Did you not hear what the firefighters were saying? ''Like every 20 minutes, bombs go off'', At the collapsing. 20 Meter down the Collapsing. Shit explodes. 2nd Tower MASSIVE Explosion. Media edited the video's to made it look like a plane. When the 1st plane almost hitted the Tower. An explosion goes of, after it the plane goes in. WIERD ISN'T IT?

  • nano thermite bush at it again. LOL moronic fools 

  • 911 inside job, wtc 1 2 burnt for less than 2, and building 7 burnt for 7, way bigger and more structurally intact buildings, we see global collapse with no resistance throughout the entire building, including the parts that were perfectly intact. This delft building burnt for 8 hours and then a chunk of it falls to the ground.

  • @hEAtOniKx if only this building had been hit by a boeing 747 insted of a coffie pot of hot coffie it would still be standing. right dip shit.

  • well the books were burned but we learned that 911 is an inside job weel doone amsterdam

  • How so.......

  • Small part of the building collapsed after 8 hours of fire.

  • I didnt see any evidence in this being a control demolition

  • lal their cheering! HELL YHEA!

  • Thats one expensive coffee machine.

  • suspicious ?

    i mean like - the middle did go down first ... like when you crash a building on purpose (just watch videos)

    but the question would be: what use does one have of destroying TU Delft's building for architecture?

  • lol ze zouden het goede voorbeeld boeten geven voor bouwkunde daar (SPRINKLERS MSSN?)

  • WAT?

  • Cheering?? I didn't read those sounds as cheering, rather as a reaction to what happened (negative feelings like shock, disbelief)

  • zo gingen ook worldtradecenter

  • neej het world trade center is mssn een vliegtuig in gevlogen dat kan je soms zien op de videos -.=

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more