How come Charlemagne could have built the european christian empire if Jesus was born AFTER Charlemagne's death? It makes no sense at all! A good example of a CON ARTIST usurping the bumper sticker of science and rigorous historians ethics and objective studies of ALL facts (not just those that could imply some predetermined theory, silencing all other facts showing the opposite)... Don't read and enrich con artists...
Charlemagne = Carlus Magnus means in Latin = Great King (of what country pls?). GK is a typical non entity phantom, GK has built strictly nothing. Just don`t wave the C14 about, it is has become a 100% fallacy and Nobel price it was awarded a punt. JC was a composite character of prototypes acting in xi-xii cy.
What is a C14? What is a "non entity phantom"? To answer your question about Charlemagnes, he was King of the Franks from 768 to his death. He is numbered as Charles I in the regnal lists of France, Germany, and the Holy Roman Empire. Today he is regarded not only as the founding father of both French and German monarchies, but also as the father of Europe.
a carbona based dating technology. It's based on the fact that, at any certain point iin time, there is an X amount of carbondioxide in the air. Animals breath it and plant take it in. This way the amount of carbondioxide inside them is procentually equal to the amount in the air at that time. But the amount that's in the air chanches over time. By tsting, scientists made a timetable showing the fluctuations in the amount of carbondioxide over time,
Now you take your sample, measure the amount of C-14 in there, and compare it to this table. After doing some maths that go beyond what i have to know as archaeologist, these scientists can tell me how old the sample is. This can be about 20 or 30 years accurate. Using a technique that gives 20 or 30 years accuracy on a 20.000 year old wooden object is quite amazing isn't it.
A second technique with rougly the same accuracy goes by burning a small sample of an object (a hundred of a gramme or so) and comparing theC-14 released to this timetable
@sebas379 we are still talking huge timespans and nothing to cross ref it with. it may be accurate but even if it s there is no way to stack it against anything reliable. true or not I can not buy it without being sure.
with certain techniques, like comparing the yearrings on trees and wooden objects we nowadays have a yearring calendar linked through from modern day to several thousand years ago. Because trees from a certain area produce similar sized year rings in one season you look at the shapes and thickness of these rings and compare several trees with overlapping lifetimes.
@sebas379 you still have to be sure that rings on these trees produced within last hundred years, that is when dendrochronology came about, can be used as template for wood from earlier periods. even if they can be, a tree has limited life span, so you can not be sure when it was planted. how old trees an be?
Carlus Magnus does NOT mean great king, it means Charles the Great. Get you Latin facts straight. You have apparently never learned Latin or you would know better. Great king in latin is Rex Magnus.
Charlemagne was Emperor of the Frankish Empire and Holy Roman Emperor in what now is modern Germany and France.
@HawkFest GO TO THE VIDEO THE WORDS OF LUCIFER ARROWSMITH BAND. THEY TELL YOU HOW THE MEDIA IS TRYING TO BRAINWASH EVERYONE AND ITS SO DAMN FUNNY AND STUPID AND THE DEVIL IS SO ENVIOUS OF GREAT EMPIRES LIKE ANCIENT EGYPT, GREECE AND ROME, THEY WERE A BUNCH OF NOMADS WHO CAN'T LIVE WITH THE FACT THEY GAVE NOTHING TO HUMANITY. NOW THEY WANT TO PLAY WITH OURS. WE WILL FIGHT TO THE END. NO ONE CAN TAKE OUR FAITH AWAY AND FOR SURE OUR SOUL IS OWNED BY GOD NOT BY THESE WORTHLESS EMPTY DEMONS.
@1985LISS we worshippers of Conan and Corm had also been battling the Father set worshipping Illuminati for tan thousend years. this look in the text-books and you will find no motion of the Hyborian age. togather we Corm worshippers and chriesteins will overthrow the set worshippers and created the new Cimmeral
Radio-carbon method: This much touted method produces reliable dating of objects of organic origin with exactitude of plus minus 1500 years, therefore it is too crude for dating of historical events in the 3000 years timeframe! Initial calibration of this method was made basis artefacts of ancient Egypt already dated by historians. c14 dating runs as follows: archaeologist sends an artefact to a radiocarbon dating laboratory to rubberstamp his own idea of the age of the object.
all the scientific theory, inventions, discoverys and literiture of mankind were created in x-xvi cy. renaissance as a notion is a french slogan invented by victor hugo and violet le duc
@mithec the renaissance is made up during the 1800s. tell me one person that is still alive and had live though the renaissance. you can't find any prooven that humanlity was created less than 500 years ago.
@abarrathemaster you think human history is shorter then 500 years?
there is more then enough proof that things humans made are older then 10.000 years because of the tidal changes being accurate. the pyramids stand in exact possition of Orions belt, not the year 2000 no, in the year 10.500 BC the pyramids stand in exactly the same position as Orions belt, human history is wrong al right, but it sure as hell isnt shorter. its MUCH longer,, like the 300 million year old Bell, explain??
@abarrathemaster i rephrase "tidal changes being accurate" into " ruins that have been found underwater made by human hand could have only been made when the tide was much lower, for instance Yonaguni and other ruins must have been made atleast 8-10 thousand years ago, ofcourse theres also tsunamis and earthquakes that lower the land but still Much older then 500 years :)
Then would you belive that all the scientific theory, inventions, discoverys and literiture of mankind were created in the renaissance? No. Many civilizations besides western ones have been keeping calenders since many thousands of years BCE. It is thus impossible to create mankinds achivments in accordance with all nations in the world before the so called biblical start of mankind.
In the christian religion there is no fact. You can say whatever you want but carbon dating has proven all of this bullshit. These people need to get and education. Church is not school
check this heresy just in case: go to google>to `more`> to `book search`>type keyword `fomenko`, read TOC or the whole book for this matter and free of charge
i wonder what this guy thinks of Gobekli Tepe
abarrathemaster 10 months ago
bullshit he just said history is alot shorter then were told.....FOOL!
its muchh longer then were told dont get shit twisted
westwatford 2 years ago
Comment removed
Johannes3797 2 years ago
We want to know truth! history was deformed and edited
sovietvorshtain 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What a load of Bollocks!
neil73 3 years ago
How come Charlemagne could have built the european christian empire if Jesus was born AFTER Charlemagne's death? It makes no sense at all! A good example of a CON ARTIST usurping the bumper sticker of science and rigorous historians ethics and objective studies of ALL facts (not just those that could imply some predetermined theory, silencing all other facts showing the opposite)... Don't read and enrich con artists...
HawkFest 3 years ago
Charlemagne = Carlus Magnus means in Latin = Great King (of what country pls?). GK is a typical non entity phantom, GK has built strictly nothing. Just don`t wave the C14 about, it is has become a 100% fallacy and Nobel price it was awarded a punt. JC was a composite character of prototypes acting in xi-xii cy.
mithec 3 years ago
What is a C14? What is a "non entity phantom"? To answer your question about Charlemagnes, he was King of the Franks from 768 to his death. He is numbered as Charles I in the regnal lists of France, Germany, and the Holy Roman Empire. Today he is regarded not only as the founding father of both French and German monarchies, but also as the father of Europe.
HawkFest 3 years ago
a carbona based dating technology. It's based on the fact that, at any certain point iin time, there is an X amount of carbondioxide in the air. Animals breath it and plant take it in. This way the amount of carbondioxide inside them is procentually equal to the amount in the air at that time. But the amount that's in the air chanches over time. By tsting, scientists made a timetable showing the fluctuations in the amount of carbondioxide over time,
sebas379 2 years ago
Now you take your sample, measure the amount of C-14 in there, and compare it to this table. After doing some maths that go beyond what i have to know as archaeologist, these scientists can tell me how old the sample is. This can be about 20 or 30 years accurate. Using a technique that gives 20 or 30 years accuracy on a 20.000 year old wooden object is quite amazing isn't it.
sebas379 2 years ago
A second technique with rougly the same accuracy goes by burning a small sample of an object (a hundred of a gramme or so) and comparing theC-14 released to this timetable
sebas379 2 years ago
@sebas379 we are still talking huge timespans and nothing to cross ref it with. it may be accurate but even if it s there is no way to stack it against anything reliable. true or not I can not buy it without being sure.
korgho5757 1 year ago
with certain techniques, like comparing the yearrings on trees and wooden objects we nowadays have a yearring calendar linked through from modern day to several thousand years ago. Because trees from a certain area produce similar sized year rings in one season you look at the shapes and thickness of these rings and compare several trees with overlapping lifetimes.
sebas379 1 year ago
@sebas379 you still have to be sure that rings on these trees produced within last hundred years, that is when dendrochronology came about, can be used as template for wood from earlier periods. even if they can be, a tree has limited life span, so you can not be sure when it was planted. how old trees an be?
korgho5757 1 year ago
Carlus Magnus does NOT mean great king, it means Charles the Great. Get you Latin facts straight. You have apparently never learned Latin or you would know better. Great king in latin is Rex Magnus.
Charlemagne was Emperor of the Frankish Empire and Holy Roman Emperor in what now is modern Germany and France.
fluorescentfish 2 years ago
@fluorescentfish well, it means great king not sure if in Latin precisely but if you down shift the cognates you are with just that Great King.
korgho5757 1 year ago
@HawkFest GO TO THE VIDEO THE WORDS OF LUCIFER ARROWSMITH BAND. THEY TELL YOU HOW THE MEDIA IS TRYING TO BRAINWASH EVERYONE AND ITS SO DAMN FUNNY AND STUPID AND THE DEVIL IS SO ENVIOUS OF GREAT EMPIRES LIKE ANCIENT EGYPT, GREECE AND ROME, THEY WERE A BUNCH OF NOMADS WHO CAN'T LIVE WITH THE FACT THEY GAVE NOTHING TO HUMANITY. NOW THEY WANT TO PLAY WITH OURS. WE WILL FIGHT TO THE END. NO ONE CAN TAKE OUR FAITH AWAY AND FOR SURE OUR SOUL IS OWNED BY GOD NOT BY THESE WORTHLESS EMPTY DEMONS.
1985LISS 11 months ago
@1985LISS we worshippers of Conan and Corm had also been battling the Father set worshipping Illuminati for tan thousend years. this look in the text-books and you will find no motion of the Hyborian age. togather we Corm worshippers and chriesteins will overthrow the set worshippers and created the new Cimmeral
abarrathemaster 10 months ago
Interesting, I"ll search in Google, Thank"s.
Dudongo86 3 years ago
Radio-carbon method: This much touted method produces reliable dating of objects of organic origin with exactitude of plus minus 1500 years, therefore it is too crude for dating of historical events in the 3000 years timeframe! Initial calibration of this method was made basis artefacts of ancient Egypt already dated by historians. c14 dating runs as follows: archaeologist sends an artefact to a radiocarbon dating laboratory to rubberstamp his own idea of the age of the object.
mithec 5 years ago
You're forgetting the other 150 independent dating methods.
Atheist001 3 years ago
ur just attheist
25MEGALIVE 2 years ago
all the scientific theory, inventions, discoverys and literiture of mankind were created in x-xvi cy. renaissance as a notion is a french slogan invented by victor hugo and violet le duc
mithec 5 years ago
@mithec the renaissance is made up during the 1800s. tell me one person that is still alive and had live though the renaissance. you can't find any prooven that humanlity was created less than 500 years ago.
abarrathemaster 10 months ago
@abarrathemaster you think human history is shorter then 500 years?
there is more then enough proof that things humans made are older then 10.000 years because of the tidal changes being accurate. the pyramids stand in exact possition of Orions belt, not the year 2000 no, in the year 10.500 BC the pyramids stand in exactly the same position as Orions belt, human history is wrong al right, but it sure as hell isnt shorter. its MUCH longer,, like the 300 million year old Bell, explain??
Thys93 3 months ago
@abarrathemaster i rephrase "tidal changes being accurate" into " ruins that have been found underwater made by human hand could have only been made when the tide was much lower, for instance Yonaguni and other ruins must have been made atleast 8-10 thousand years ago, ofcourse theres also tsunamis and earthquakes that lower the land but still Much older then 500 years :)
Thys93 3 months ago
needless to say, gay
donxcore 5 years ago
You cannot explain a Myan Calender, dating almost 700 years BCE on a different continent to be created by man in the European renaissance period.
yadsik 5 years ago
Then would you belive that all the scientific theory, inventions, discoverys and literiture of mankind were created in the renaissance? No. Many civilizations besides western ones have been keeping calenders since many thousands of years BCE. It is thus impossible to create mankinds achivments in accordance with all nations in the world before the so called biblical start of mankind.
yadsik 5 years ago
In the christian religion there is no fact. You can say whatever you want but carbon dating has proven all of this bullshit. These people need to get and education. Church is not school
SiriusEris 5 years ago
check this heresy just in case: go to google>to `more`> to `book search`>type keyword `fomenko`, read TOC or the whole book for this matter and free of charge
mithec 5 years ago