The Scotti were the first Irish; who were pressed into the northeast corner, Ulster, and from there launched their raids against the Picts of then-Scotland, also settled and joined in with the Picts against the Romans, and ultimately the Scotti in Scotland surpassed the Scotti in Ireland in influence.
Milesians could have been Scythians or Iberians, or "Gaelicized" descendants of the original Irish Tuath-de who were - here we are - Jews. It would be more accurate to call them Hebrews, designating the tribe -- at that early time they were not "Jews". Hebrew migration.
Scota's origins, her place in prehistory•If that is all there is, why do we find references to her and her Milesian people, that tie her people from ancient Palestine and the Old Testament (yes!) and a tribe of Hebrews (not "Jews" at that time) who migrated through Egypt (perhaps) to Spain (Iberia - Eber- Hebrew) and from there to Ireland, Hibernia. The "Scotti" of Ireland (roots of Scotia?) went to Scotland, gave it their name, and the groups went back and forth for millennia
The scythians were not persian they just ruled persia for the time they were there todays modern hungarians are the modern descendants of the ancient scythians who lived in sumeria before the coming of the assyrians the magyar hungarian scythian tribe puts there origin in the Carpathian basin even before they were in summeria they are that ancient having said all that its true that the majority of the tribes in western europe that are called celts are indeed scythian originally.
I think I'll trust ALL the ORIGINAL Grrek, Scotish, Irish, Saxon, Roman, Germanic/Gaul/Gothic/Visigoth history books and the Kings own bloodline of Scotland as to who the white race is.. over a bunch of clowns here who have been judaized into multicultural Commun-ism.
.
A lot of tools of the perfidious, Satanic jew around here.
"We know, Most Holy Father & Lord, & from the chronicles and books of the ancients gathered, that among other illustrious nations, ours, to wit the nation of the Scots, has been distinguished by many honors; which passing from the greater SCYTHIA through the Mediterranean Sea & the pillars of Hercules & sojourning in Spain through a long course of time & coming thence 1,200 years after the outgoing of the people of ISRAEL." Robert the Bruce, Declaration of Scotland
Enough of all this Hebrew shite. Why should anybody care if there part of one of the ten tribes of Israel aka the so called chosen people. In my opinion it is a load a bs, it mean absolute heehaw.
"We know, Most Holy Father & Lord, & from the chronicles and books of the
ancients gathered, that among other illustrious nations, ours, to wit the nation of the Scots, has been distinguished by many honors; which passing from the greater Scythia through the Mediterranean Sea & the pillars of Hercules & sojourning in Spain through a long course of time & coming thence 1,200 years after the outgoing of the people of Israel." Robert the Bruce, Declaration of Scotland (can still be seen).
How could you mix two people that are so different?
Embarassing for you.
Alans = Sarmatians. Uhlans are Polish lancers from Old Sarmatia that became Poland. And Polish people were Alanic or Sarmatians or Saracens who were non white and opressed the white slavic minorities or baltic or scandinavian or gothic people before poland was invaded by the polish Alans / Sarmatians.
Scythians are not Sarmatians. Scythian archers are named in Persian and Greek cities as mercenaries.
Alans or Allani or Allanic are Sarmatians. Even joined the roman empire as roman citizens and auxiliaries and such.
Scythians are different, with reddish hair and pale skin.
The scythians are minority in former Persia, just like the black haired, white persians are minority, but still found in parts of East Europe near Black Sea.
right, first of all im English... a descendant of the angle, saxon and jutish tribes the romans paid to fight the scots and welsh when their empire started crumbling, of course being english we took the lot (roman england) and erased its inhabitants wich were mostly roman. Scots, an ancient people, fierce warriors, stubborn fuckers just like the english...the Welsh an ancient people, fierce wariors, stubborn fuckers...just like the rest of us. dont point fingers, me n u r the same. know ya enemy
The similarity can come from scyths and sarmatians, because roman empire adopted many weapons from scyths and sarmatians, like the helmet and much more.
@Jeykob3 Scynthians and Sarmats were ancient Slavs. Sarmat and Skit as correctly 2 tribes of the same origin, only the princes were different. Prince Sarmat and prince Skit. Well described in Slavic Book of Veles (destroyed by Zionists and denied on Jewpedia/Wikipedia)
@VendPrekmurec No idiot, scytians and sarmatians lives in the same time with proto-slavics tribes and ofen vas in vor vith them. There lives black hairs people in ukreyn vhich antsistors cud be scytians or sarmatians, but this mixing became later: vhen mongolo-tatars invade in steap teritory this basters became migrating in our land. Vont tu knov hav vas loke like skytians, go tu moldova, romania or caucas (moustlyi black hairs peoples)
@VendPrekmurec Another mistake, in thet time ther not vas iven vord slavs. It vord vas made later about 800-1000. But in thet time scytians tribes became tu call themsealf polovzi or pechenigs, so that iven not make seans. Pleas no more stupit coments
@Jeykob3 "But in thet time scytians tribes became tu call themsealf polovzi" I am svre yvu can backvp this claim with science "It vord vas made later about 800-1000" If yov say it was so i am svre it was, it is fact when you say that. "But in thet time scytians tribes became tu call themsealf polovzi or pechenigs" No the secret scythians that disappeared called themselv "Superman" proto-slavic. "Pleas no more stupit coments" stupit coments are stvpid question. r1a(dot)org/4.htm
@ArminRF Im ukreynian, you seank I dont knov my history idiot? Skytians is miditeraynians tyribes , evrybody vith black hair, like italians or spanish, south France. People in Ukreyn vith black hair cud hav skytians antsistors, I hope this posibility vill make you fill bater, vith your small brain.
@Jeykob3 you not have brain) Scythians were Nordic race. Greeks and Romans described Scythians and Sarmatians as tall fair-haired people. Finally, the study authors suggest that their data shows that between Bronze and Iron Ages, constellation of populations known variously as Scythians, Andronovians, etc. were blue (or green)-eyed, fair-skinned and light-haired people which might have played a role in early development of the Tarim Basin civilization. Ukraine people dark becouse mix with turkic
Then why have slavs (Poles, Russians, Ukrainians) most R1A DNA in europe?
Pre-nineteenth century books from many european countries describe Poles, Russians ect. as sarmatians and scythians. You should at least educate yourself before you make false claims.
w w w eupedia.com/europe/origins_haplogroups_europe.shtml#R1a
@Jeykob3 Your way of thinking is fucken Clown Shoes , now listen , BLOND HAIR , only began to exist 9 thousand years ago ! so the first ARYANS Had black hair , ALL THIS IS FACT . also other Fact all indo Aryan Language comes from the SANSKRIT born in the Hindu Kush , iranic Tribs and Indic Tribes original Aryans .get this out of your head about Blonde hair , blonde hair is a mutation, still Aryan but a later aryan from the originals !
@FillHipLips it is 100% nonsense))) Aryans were with blond hair)) Aryans originated from Andronovo Culture modern day Russia and Kazakstan. 60% of people Andronovo Culture had blond hair. first Indo-European language was born in South-West Russia not Sanskrit. purest Indo-European language is Lithuanian
Our recorded history go's back before the Ice Age to our land, and Skara Brae, dates far beyond that, and we've never moved since.
Ever since anyone and everyone has tried to claim us, but fact is beyond the ice age there is no recording and its impossible to know anything, therefore our ethnic flesh and blood is ours and forever.
God bless all Gaelic and Brythonic Celts, preservation of your race and culture has been your goal, and 100,000 years strong, no one can endure as much.
Irian-speaking Alan warrior? It's all good and well to be proud of ones ancestry,but be a bit fair. ;) On a sidenote I think Alans originally come from modern day Armenia you may want to check on that. Aside from that the scythians never came as far as England, Sarmaritan auxilaries on the other hand, but that could hardly have influenced a people's genetic tree much. I'd think Russians and perhaps Slavs descend from these fellows (to a degree).
@diekerel Scytians and Celts share a common origin, tat dosn't make them the same people. Cetic people are predominantly R1b haplotype, and scythans R1a.
If the hole story of haplogroups is true it depends which region of Europe you mean, whole europe it looks to me that R1A is dominant. Search for eupedia in google or r1a or g / 4(dot) ht m
@buckwats Celtic is a modern made up mid 1800's word from an English linguist who used the term to group language similarities only, it was later hi-jacked by Irish republicans in the early 1900's to group more than languages, but people and culture too, that's how Irish wrongly believed they were right to use Scottish cultures at the time, and why many typical dumb Plastic Paddie Yanks still continue to believe Irish historical revision. The motive was Roman Irish Catholic propaganda.
@buckwats The Irish and Scots are as distinctly different from each other as the Irish and English are. Make no mistake about it.
Scots are by far Caledonian Pictish as attested in the 'OGAP4' code taken throughout all of Scotland over a 12 year period (1996~2008). Scots are therefore more Scythian like (from the east) where as the English are more Germanic (south-east) and the Irish started as more Iberian invaders from where modern day Spain is today.
@mrtruthify And did you happen to be around back then ? No ? Then please stop this "thruthifying" of yours. Writing certain words in CAPS does not necesarily make them FACTS. I am EXTREMELY tired of amateur pocket-historians making up stupid youtube videos about how every and all races descended from their particular ancestors. But what annoys me even more is all the people writing replies about how THEIR crazy theory is much more justified. People always think they are smart as hell
@mrtruthify How was that supposed to be a reply ? Everything you mentioned in here is stupid and non factual theory's based on linguistics that simply doesnt make sense. "This nation, if you remove several letters sounds slighty like Israel and therefore is is now a fact". And now that somebody tells you it is BS you are prolly gonna post some comment about how I'm "undermining your glorius ancestors" or that I "prolly never read anything about it myself". SMH
Well. I think I'll let the history books do the talking. As for clowns such as yourself who have no idea.. you can be judaized all you wish. Your opinion is garbage. My comments are chock full of facts. By the way.. the Irish WELSH language is in fact Hebrew. Play an audio recording of Hebrew for a Welshman. Watch him explain it to you.
.
What is occurring in all white nations must really be a mystery to those like you. We would all be destroyed, if for your ingnorant kind.
@mrtruthify I studied ancient Irish history for over 20 years.You are wrong on all accounts. I dont know what history books you are reading from and as far as I can see most people on this page seem to disagree with you and all seem to be Irish and Scots.
@buckwats Thanks to the Seminal works of Simon James (1999) and Brian Sykes (2006) the term 'Celtic' can now be understood for the Victorian romantic idiocy that it is.
I could really care less what your secular judaized book tells you. You understand a sparse history related in geographical terms. I know a history of far greater antiquity.. And even the village foll might know the linguistically connections. You have become the fool of judaizers, accepting geographical designations for Ethnic ties. Same genes.. same blood.. of the same tribes (originally).. same people. When you learn to stop associating flesh with dirt.. u will have truth.
@mrtruthify Once again you fail to post ANY sort of evidence for your claims. According to you fucks EVERYTHING is a hebrew transliteration. And you always post your shit as if it was the most factual piece of information ever. Becouse SOME book said so. There is a reason why you post these things here on youtube instead of writing a book, or holding lectures at oxford. But its probably just the oxford types who are too small minded to understand your grand revelations
"We know, Most Holy Father & Lord, & from the chronicles and books of the
ancients gathered, that among other illustrious nations, ours, to wit the nation of the Scots, has been distinguished by many honors; which passing from the greater Scythia through the Mediterranean Sea & the pillars of Hercules & sojourning in Spain through a long course of time & coming thence 1,200 years after the outgoing of the people of Israel." Robert the Bruce, Declaration of Scotland (can still be seen).
@segano1 you are wrong in this the anicent inhabitants of scotland were the picts. 'Scot' comes frome the Scotti a celtic tribe who invaded from ulster look up the estabilhment of the kingdom of dalriada
@tecphobe No, I am right, don't bother with the same comments, I've heard them a million times before.
The Scots were always indigenous to Scotland/Caledonia, that's why the foundation of the Church there was based on the Isle of Iona (Western Caledonia/Scotland).
Google: "Irish tribesmen the Scots did not come from Ireland",
Dál Riata started in Scotland and expanded into Ulster in the time of Christ, hence why the Capital, Dunadd, was in Scotland and not Ulster.
@tecphobe 'Celtic' was first coined by Welsh linguist Edward Lhuyd in 1707 only to group old languages from across the British isles and parts of continental Europe and the East.
Heavily romanticised in the 1800s, by the 19th century, the term was hi-jacked by Irish republicans who used the term as a political tool to resist 'British-ness' during the height of the Irish republican movement, they did this by trying to re-define the term as an ethnic one, when all it was, was a linguist grouping.
@tecphobe Thanks to the seminal works of Simon James (1999) and Brian Sykes (2006), the term 'Celtic' can be understood for the Victorian romantic idiocy that it is.
Hence, it's fake, used for all the wrong reasons and romanticised as a collective singular grouping of a distinct people, when it couldn't actually be any further from the truth in reality.
"Celt" was a name used by ROME. They called their land "Celtica" (it's Latin). You clearly have a great deal of trouble with judaizers in history.. from the real history in books centuries older. No wonder people like you are so confused. Rather than go to the source and make an independent determination.. you rely on other to think for you. You might learn a basic understanding of linguistics. It really cuts through the garbage quite effectively. Its almost as good as DNA.
This also links to the name Alan, as alot of scottish and irish use this name. One tribe branched of scythia were called Alans or Alanians. This could prove something.
No,Celts and Picts(pre celtic)were previously Maykop R1b,1st cousins of the indo iranians R1a,but not indo iranians,both come from the Proto indo europeans,so they are deeply related nevertheless.
I didn't really mean to get off track on a long-winded conversation on the origin of the celts. My only point was that anything resembling a tartan or kilt that is over 3000 years old either means that...
1) Similar clothing developed by a separate culture. It might only look like a tartan.
2) The mummies aren't 3000 years old.
It seems odd that a popular item of clothing would be found on a mummy predating the use of it by so long. Might have the same source though I don't know kilt history.
Oh, sorry - I got confused here. I've done further research, and you, my friend, are correct. I recently upgraded my Celtic history books, since the one I used here was written in 1980 :).
You are correct, they are of Indo-European origin.
@MetallicThor I was referring to the Irish Celts. The majority of the Celts, however, are Indo-European. Re-check the history of the Phoenicians - as far as I know, they are Indos.
Dont belive the red hair shit.Nearly every mummy in Egypt has red hair,they were like wtf about this but it was proven its just some chemical change that occurs on dead mummificed bodies,so red haired mummies,while they were alive had most probably different hair color.
@Illidanee Red hair was actually a Norse trait that the Vikings brought with them when they migrated to S-E Ireland, and the reason Scotland has that 13% red haired population is due to the large migration of Irish who came to S-W Scotland and particularly east Glasgow to escape the famine.
@xabamsar - Yes good question, They boys have red hair, but their traits and blood is indo iranian not Norse Yet have red hair, One can not say that only Norse carry Red Hair in their blood, Some North iranians have shown to have red, but are NOT Germanic by blood,.. What does this Show ?
@Steini224 That too, yes :). There were so many large Germanic tribes across Europe, since they were, after all, the Old Europeans. The Slavs, Dacians (before Romans took it over), Alemanni, Saxons, Jutes, Franks, Visigoths, Ostrogoths, Cimbri, and the Teutones were all Old Europeans.
@celticbattleaxe Kilts on mummies is ridiculous. It's probably all just BS if that's the case, since if you look at celtic history you'd notice that kilts originated in the 16th century and were NEVER worn before that. Not only that but until recently no other celtic countries have ever worn kilts.
It's actually an argument against them being celtic, and shows that if it was supposed to be a kilt, it was probably put there by someone or is all just some sham by someone who didn't do research.
@MasterAsra I am Irish by the way. But a red haired mummy in ancient China is believable. But if it has anything resembling a kilt on, it just seems fishy to me, like someone said that later to spur some sort of racism or other silliness or for PR purposes.
@MasterAsra Sorry to contradict you, but you are wrong: the earliest tartan in Europe was dated to the 900s and was a combo of two colors. Yes, the family tartan kilts (as far as we know) and the highland unit kilts were designed in the 1600s. I doubt anyone would "sham" it. Why would they?
@celticbattleaxe Ehhh, the same way people try to say all of the Egyptian pharoahs or those who built the pyramids were white, or other things like that. It was pretty common at one point to just say white people were responsible for everything.
Also, since the kilts are Scottish, even if they were first made in 900, that still doesn't explain why they're on 3000 year old mummies, since they didn't exist for thousands of years, and even when they did they were strictly a Scottish thing.
@celticbattleaxe Though to be fair, it is fairly common to find red hair on mummies, though there are chemical processes which can make them that color, depending on the types of preservation techniques used. Even htough they probably weren't Han Chinese(since they weren't in Western China at that point), there are other ethnic groups that do have red hair around the area, such as persians or even the old Tocharians.
Celts in britain have lived there for 20k years(mostly in Wales).
@MasterAsra Cont. Some groups do have history from mainland Europe back when there was a landbridge there, such as the picts, but even if it is true, it's weird to think of a group with no known written language(none of the ancient celtic tribes had any forms of writing system before the Romans appeared) would have managed to go all the way to ancient China and be entombed there.
It's POSSIBLE, though a 3000 year old mummy with a tartan is confusing historically. No brit burial mounds have em.
@MasterAsra I don't really LIKE spamming comments but there's one other thing aside from no ancient celtic burial mounds that old having tartans(any that old, I mean. At least none found yet).As to celtic people, red hair has never been too dominant among any celtic tribe I think. Yet all the mummies(as far as I know) buried there has red hair. It'd seem more likely to have been intentionally made red, either from the hair being treated with something metallic and then rusting or similar things.
@MasterAsra NOT true THEY HAD MUCH writting they will not reviel it to nonceltic people OGHOLM AND RUNIC and PICTISH SWIRL ASWELL AS GLIFS THEY WHERE IN EGYPT AND TOUGHT LANGUAGE AS THEY WHERE PRESENT AT BABYL LEARN LEARN LEARN MORE druidic knowlage is the base of egyptian and many other mystery schools celts are hyperborian as well as other tribes who are related tut has r1B dna look at the keltic cloth every where the ido-aryans where do the math
@MasterAsra Hmmmm... not all in Wales. That happened mainly from the Saxon and Roman invasions. Many Pretannic tribes moved north to the Picts, while others, like the Brigantes, moved to Eirinn. Wales was, however, a major trade point between Eirinn and Albion.
@celticbattleaxe Yeah, then when the Anglo-Saxons arrived the Brythonic people left and went to places like Britanny and Galicia. That's why you've got similar cultures to Wales in Britanny and Cornwall while the Scottish and Irish Gaelic cultures are so similar. The first fossilized people 20,000 years ago during the end of the last ice age were found in Wales is what I meant, since some people like to talk about the celts from mainland Europe going to Britain over a land bridge much later.
@celticbattleaxe Yeah it was a bit preachy and I was tired when I originally wrote them so I might just delete the nonessential ones. Sorry about that.
I have no doubt that the Celts spread that far and originated from the Scythians. There has been recent archaeological evidence in a burial ground of ancient Chinese wearing kilts. Yes, kilts. WITH A TARTAN.
It seems more likely with the Celts being related to the Greeks, and that the Germans were more related to the Scythians since they were true Indo Europeans. Not to piss off my Celtic brothers and sisters here, but the Germans were the Old Europeans. The Celts came later, but not by much.
@celticbattleaxe There also seems to be conusion about the difference between Celt and German/Indo European. The facts are, that the Indo Europeans were the ancestors of BOTH Celts and Germans, and also the Greeks. The Phonecians can also be considered Indo Europeans. It i just more correct (exact) to say that the Celts were of Greek descent, but they were Indo European as well. I say "true" Indo Europeans are the Germans since they are more directly related.
@Natalie851000 Well, it takes time and research, as you elegantly pointed out. I studied under TGE Powell for this info, as well as Dr. Ian Barnes. It's as close to facts as we can get.
@Natalie851000 And I have no problem with that; all I am saying is what was said/written and still is being said/written by historians and archaeologists. It is still up for debate - the truth is that we don't know everything we'd like to know about. There are always debates in history, and this makes it interesting to study.
@Natalie851000 Oh, denying history makes me sick. I almost beat-up someone in my high school (yeah - I don't graduate "officially" until the 24th of this month :( ) who said out loud that 9/11 was a lie. The only thing stopping me was the fact that there were hundreds of people already in the hallways (my high school has about 2800 students - no joke there). I still wish I at least knocked him hard against the lockers.
@Natalie851000 So true - this is the problem with opinions being confused with fact. This is also why epistemological philosophy is great :). Just because you believe something does not necessarily make it true, and something true does not necessarily have to be what you believe. But, if you put your mind to something, the impossible can be totally possible. I agree with you 100%.
@TheFatalInstinct1 A lot more than a pompous imperialistic jackass like you, dickie :)
I respect the UK (especially the Royal Marines helping us in the Mid East), but you sound like a common man-slut who got kicked out of a Scottish pub and crawled back to London.
Two can play your game, and I highly suggest you don't include me.
@celticbattleaxe Where ever did I say I was English? You poofy bastard Plastic Paddie Yankee Doodle Cunt.
Do you some how think only English call you Yanks as Plastic people?
You'd get your fat DUMB bastard Yank face BATTARD in a Scottish bar just because of your Yank rhetoric, personality and annoying Yankee Doodle accent.
Do you seriously think that you walking about with an accent like that makes people see you as one of them? LMFAO! Get the fuck out of here ya Yank bastard.
@TheFatalInstinct1 You act like one, moron!! Secondly, you spelled "battered" wrong, and furthermore, if I went to a Scottish pub, I'd be welcomed. Why? A little thing called RESPECT, perhaps a term you aren't familiar with :), and because of my ancestry (ie Gordon highlanders).
Do you have ANY idea how many Scots and Irish moved to America, Nova Scotia, and Canada? That's how I'm related, jackass.
BTW, I'm not "done yet" - I'm going to sit here and watch you get blocked.
@celticbattleaxe You'll always be a Yank and nothing else, no matter how much you try to learn about our nations, no matter how long and hard you try to not be a Yank we don't give a fuck about your nation but you obsess about ours, just goes to show your fucked up overly romanticised badly outdated view of other peoples nations far far away from Yankeeland, it just makes you even more of a Yank, your bulk of your far distant ancestors are Hillbilly red neck pre Yankee Canuck cunts.
@TheFatalInstinct1 you are very ignorant and clearly have issues, their are 5 million scots in scotland but 20 million est. people of scots decent through out the world mainly settled in canada ie nova scotia ie new scotland, america, austratlia, nothern ireland who are you to deny them their history. Granted some left these shores of their own accord but that alone does not deny them a right to their history and what of the the many forcibly removed ie highland clearence. read a book or two.
@TheFatalInstinct1 you are very ignorant and clearly have issues, their are 5 million scots in scotland but 20 million est. people of scots decent through out the world mainly settled in canada ie nova scotia ie new scotland, america, austratlia, nothern ireland who are you to deny them their history. Granted some left these shores of their own accord but that alone does not deny them a right to their history and what of the the many forcibly removed ie highland clearence. read a book or two.
@TheFatalInstinct1 Uh, excuse me, I am most definitely NOT a Yankee fan - Mets any day.
Shithead, I'm not descended from the English. I am a mix of Scottish, Irish and Welsh (with a little Native American as well). I respect my ancestors more than you have ever respected your mom.
You are making you nation look like a piece of crap by acting this way. Sit down and shut up.
Explain why Americans are "intellectually inferior" - clearly, you have NEVER been here, dickie.
But of course this is recent history, we have lost our prehistory of northern hemisphere as of the last major ice age.
TheCnuny 3 days ago
The Scotti were the first Irish; who were pressed into the northeast corner, Ulster, and from there launched their raids against the Picts of then-Scotland, also settled and joined in with the Picts against the Romans, and ultimately the Scotti in Scotland surpassed the Scotti in Ireland in influence.
TheCnuny 3 days ago
Milesians could have been Scythians or Iberians, or "Gaelicized" descendants of the original Irish Tuath-de who were - here we are - Jews. It would be more accurate to call them Hebrews, designating the tribe -- at that early time they were not "Jews". Hebrew migration.
TheCnuny 3 days ago
Scota's origins, her place in prehistory•If that is all there is, why do we find references to her and her Milesian people, that tie her people from ancient Palestine and the Old Testament (yes!) and a tribe of Hebrews (not "Jews" at that time) who migrated through Egypt (perhaps) to Spain (Iberia - Eber- Hebrew) and from there to Ireland, Hibernia. The "Scotti" of Ireland (roots of Scotia?) went to Scotland, gave it their name, and the groups went back and forth for millennia
TheCnuny 3 days ago
The scythians were not persian they just ruled persia for the time they were there todays modern hungarians are the modern descendants of the ancient scythians who lived in sumeria before the coming of the assyrians the magyar hungarian scythian tribe puts there origin in the Carpathian basin even before they were in summeria they are that ancient having said all that its true that the majority of the tribes in western europe that are called celts are indeed scythian originally.
hartejoseph 4 days ago
I think I'll trust ALL the ORIGINAL Grrek, Scotish, Irish, Saxon, Roman, Germanic/Gaul/Gothic/Visigoth history books and the Kings own bloodline of Scotland as to who the white race is.. over a bunch of clowns here who have been judaized into multicultural Commun-ism.
.
A lot of tools of the perfidious, Satanic jew around here.
mrtruthify 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Declaration of Abroath;
"We know, Most Holy Father & Lord, & from the chronicles and books of the ancients gathered, that among other illustrious nations, ours, to wit the nation of the Scots, has been distinguished by many honors; which passing from the greater SCYTHIA through the Mediterranean Sea & the pillars of Hercules & sojourning in Spain through a long course of time & coming thence 1,200 years after the outgoing of the people of ISRAEL." Robert the Bruce, Declaration of Scotland
mrtruthify 4 days ago
Enough of all this Hebrew shite. Why should anybody care if there part of one of the ten tribes of Israel aka the so called chosen people. In my opinion it is a load a bs, it mean absolute heehaw.
rydomart911 2 weeks ago
now now all humans are related in one way or another migration from east africa don't forget that is where we all come from I am Ukrainian
ukrunya 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Even the Edomite, Canaanite, Khazarian (Mongolian) "jews" know quite well who Israel really is.
The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol 12, Page 249: "the identification of the
'Sacae, or "Sythians", with the Ten Tribes because they appear in history
at the same time, and very nearly the same place, as the Israelites
removed by (Assyrian King) Shalmaneser".
'Brit-ish', is a Hebrew transliteration, meaning, "People (or Men) [of the]
Covenant "
mrtruthify 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Levi is perhaps the easiest modern nation to identify, it retains a legal
name that matches her ancient tribe.
Switzerland's legal name is the Confederation of the Helvetti. The last term
in the name is a Helenized form of the root word "Lvetti." That word, in
turn, is simply a respelling of the voweless Hebrew name LVT, or LeViTe.
Also, in Hebrew, the H prefix means "the."
Switzerland is thus, the "Confederation of the Levites."
mrtruthify 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"We know, Most Holy Father & Lord, & from the chronicles and books of the
ancients gathered, that among other illustrious nations, ours, to wit the nation of the Scots, has been distinguished by many honors; which passing from the greater Scythia through the Mediterranean Sea & the pillars of Hercules & sojourning in Spain through a long course of time & coming thence 1,200 years after the outgoing of the people of Israel." Robert the Bruce, Declaration of Scotland (can still be seen).
mrtruthify 2 months ago
BS.. SYTHIANS WERE ISRAELITES, THAT IS A FACT.
mrtruthify 3 months ago
Celts was macedonians and scythians was old slavs and DONIANS was people from river don in russia and descendants of MACEDONIANS!!!
RickyPraviMicky 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How could you mix two people that are so different?
Embarassing for you.
Alans = Sarmatians. Uhlans are Polish lancers from Old Sarmatia that became Poland. And Polish people were Alanic or Sarmatians or Saracens who were non white and opressed the white slavic minorities or baltic or scandinavian or gothic people before poland was invaded by the polish Alans / Sarmatians.
Scythians are not Sarmatians. Scythian archers are named in Persian and Greek cities as mercenaries.
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Again, according to All Known History of Europe:
Alans or Allani or Allanic are Sarmatians. Even joined the roman empire as roman citizens and auxiliaries and such.
Scythians are different, with reddish hair and pale skin.
The scythians are minority in former Persia, just like the black haired, white persians are minority, but still found in parts of East Europe near Black Sea.
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Persians were white, with black hair. Still found in Balkans and parts of Black Sea like pre-georgian Mingrelians.
These are white people, with persian black hair.
The alans are very different. They are iranian yes, but they are the Sarmatians.
The Scythians were red haired people with blueish eyes, and white skin.
Everyone knows this already .... where were you ?
Soveraine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LEON DENIS
LE GENIE CELTIQUE ET LE MONDE INVISIBLE
spirite.free.fr/ouvrages/genie/genie.htm
silviompge 4 months ago
right, first of all im English... a descendant of the angle, saxon and jutish tribes the romans paid to fight the scots and welsh when their empire started crumbling, of course being english we took the lot (roman england) and erased its inhabitants wich were mostly roman. Scots, an ancient people, fierce warriors, stubborn fuckers just like the english...the Welsh an ancient people, fierce wariors, stubborn fuckers...just like the rest of us. dont point fingers, me n u r the same. know ya enemy
untillambsarelions 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The similarity can come from scyths and sarmatians, because roman empire adopted many weapons from scyths and sarmatians, like the helmet and much more.
ArminRF 4 months ago
Comment removed
ArminRF 4 months ago
Celts also come from Scynthian root.
VendPrekmurec 5 months ago
I m Ukraynian, and I will be short : Not belive!
Jeykob3 5 months ago
@Jeykob3 Scynthians and Sarmats were ancient Slavs. Sarmat and Skit as correctly 2 tribes of the same origin, only the princes were different. Prince Sarmat and prince Skit. Well described in Slavic Book of Veles (destroyed by Zionists and denied on Jewpedia/Wikipedia)
VendPrekmurec 5 months ago
@VendPrekmurec No idiot, scytians and sarmatians lives in the same time with proto-slavics tribes and ofen vas in vor vith them. There lives black hairs people in ukreyn vhich antsistors cud be scytians or sarmatians, but this mixing became later: vhen mongolo-tatars invade in steap teritory this basters became migrating in our land. Vont tu knov hav vas loke like skytians, go tu moldova, romania or caucas (moustlyi black hairs peoples)
Jeykob3 5 months ago
@Jeykob3 listen JACOB, stay with Hebraic "history". In Book of Veles is in details described prince Skit and Scynthians as "slavic brothers". Slavs.
VendPrekmurec 5 months ago
@VendPrekmurec Another mistake, in thet time ther not vas iven vord slavs. It vord vas made later about 800-1000. But in thet time scytians tribes became tu call themsealf polovzi or pechenigs, so that iven not make seans. Pleas no more stupit coments
Jeykob3 5 months ago
@Jeykob3 First of all; learn English, your spelling is catastrophic.
VendPrekmurec 5 months ago
ArminRF 4 months ago
@ArminRF Im ukreynian, you seank I dont knov my history idiot? Skytians is miditeraynians tyribes , evrybody vith black hair, like italians or spanish, south France. People in Ukreyn vith black hair cud hav skytians antsistors, I hope this posibility vill make you fill bater, vith your small brain.
Jeykob3 4 months ago
@Jeykob3 you not have brain) Scythians were Nordic race. Greeks and Romans described Scythians and Sarmatians as tall fair-haired people. Finally, the study authors suggest that their data shows that between Bronze and Iron Ages, constellation of populations known variously as Scythians, Andronovians, etc. were blue (or green)-eyed, fair-skinned and light-haired people which might have played a role in early development of the Tarim Basin civilization. Ukraine people dark becouse mix with turkic
wolsky25 4 months ago
Comment removed
ArminRF 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Jeykob3
Your ancestors, lol ;) --> watch?v=9rRWXpXdcog&feature=related
ArminRF 4 months ago
@Jeykob3
Why do you call him idiot?
Then why have slavs (Poles, Russians, Ukrainians) most R1A DNA in europe?
Pre-nineteenth century books from many european countries describe Poles, Russians ect. as sarmatians and scythians. You should at least educate yourself before you make false claims.
w w w eupedia.com/europe/origins_haplogroups_europe.shtml#R1a
ArminRF 4 months ago
@Jeykob3 Your way of thinking is fucken Clown Shoes , now listen , BLOND HAIR , only began to exist 9 thousand years ago ! so the first ARYANS Had black hair , ALL THIS IS FACT . also other Fact all indo Aryan Language comes from the SANSKRIT born in the Hindu Kush , iranic Tribs and Indic Tribes original Aryans .get this out of your head about Blonde hair , blonde hair is a mutation, still Aryan but a later aryan from the originals !
FillHipLips 4 months ago
@FillHipLips it is 100% nonsense))) Aryans were with blond hair)) Aryans originated from Andronovo Culture modern day Russia and Kazakstan. 60% of people Andronovo Culture had blond hair. first Indo-European language was born in South-West Russia not Sanskrit. purest Indo-European language is Lithuanian
wolsky25 4 months ago
Scot here
Our recorded history go's back before the Ice Age to our land, and Skara Brae, dates far beyond that, and we've never moved since.
Ever since anyone and everyone has tried to claim us, but fact is beyond the ice age there is no recording and its impossible to know anything, therefore our ethnic flesh and blood is ours and forever.
God bless all Gaelic and Brythonic Celts, preservation of your race and culture has been your goal, and 100,000 years strong, no one can endure as much.
CelticAngloPress 5 months ago
Irian-speaking Alan warrior? It's all good and well to be proud of ones ancestry,but be a bit fair. ;) On a sidenote I think Alans originally come from modern day Armenia you may want to check on that. Aside from that the scythians never came as far as England, Sarmaritan auxilaries on the other hand, but that could hardly have influenced a people's genetic tree much. I'd think Russians and perhaps Slavs descend from these fellows (to a degree).
diekerel 6 months ago
@diekerel Scytians and Celts share a common origin, tat dosn't make them the same people. Cetic people are predominantly R1b haplotype, and scythans R1a.
buckwats 4 months ago
@buckwats
If the hole story of haplogroups is true it depends which region of Europe you mean, whole europe it looks to me that R1A is dominant. Search for eupedia in google or r1a or g / 4(dot) ht m
ArminRF 4 months ago
@buckwats Celtic is a modern made up mid 1800's word from an English linguist who used the term to group language similarities only, it was later hi-jacked by Irish republicans in the early 1900's to group more than languages, but people and culture too, that's how Irish wrongly believed they were right to use Scottish cultures at the time, and why many typical dumb Plastic Paddie Yanks still continue to believe Irish historical revision. The motive was Roman Irish Catholic propaganda.
TheFatalInstinct1 4 months ago
@buckwats The Irish and Scots are as distinctly different from each other as the Irish and English are. Make no mistake about it.
Scots are by far Caledonian Pictish as attested in the 'OGAP4' code taken throughout all of Scotland over a 12 year period (1996~2008). Scots are therefore more Scythian like (from the east) where as the English are more Germanic (south-east) and the Irish started as more Iberian invaders from where modern day Spain is today.
TheFatalInstinct1 4 months ago
@TheFatalInstinct1
"IBERIA" is Hebrew... it means; "LAND OF HEBREWS".
And what yo dont seem to 'get' is you are associating these SAME peoples with geography, DIRT.
Their blood is the same.. their history is the same.. we are Israelites.
mrtruthify 3 months ago
@mrtruthify Hibernia(ancient name from Ireland) Land of the.....?
ScotiExile 3 months ago
@ScotiExile
Land of the Hebrews.
mrtruthify 3 months ago
"Iberia" is SPAIN.
"Hibernia" is IRELAND.
Spain is STILL called the Iberian (Hebrew) Peninsula.
Irish/Scot WELSH is Hebrew.
Also.. see the SCOTTISH DECLARATION.. IT CLEARLY EXPLAINS THIS.
ALSO.. SEE MY CHANNEL.. YOU WILL LEARN WITHOUT **ANY** DOUBT.. WHO YOU ARE AND WHY OUR NATIONS ARE BEING DESTROYED.. AND BY **WHO**.
mrtruthify 3 months ago
This is the greatest trick the devil ever pulled.. convincing the Adamic race they are someone they are not.
You are NOT "Caucas-ians" (a name for the DIRT you crossed over the Caucas-us mountains FROM THE HOLY LANDS).
"JEWS" ARE CANAANITE-EDOMITES.. mixed with KHAZARS... they are NOT Israelites.
"Jew" does not mean JUDAH.
mrtruthify 3 months ago
@mrtruthify And did you happen to be around back then ? No ? Then please stop this "thruthifying" of yours. Writing certain words in CAPS does not necesarily make them FACTS. I am EXTREMELY tired of amateur pocket-historians making up stupid youtube videos about how every and all races descended from their particular ancestors. But what annoys me even more is all the people writing replies about how THEIR crazy theory is much more justified. People always think they are smart as hell
SpitViciouz 2 months ago
@SpitViciouz
Be gone Mamzer.. I have no relation to you.. as your kind has no accord with me or me people.
You are not to understand the things for which you have no communion with then, now, nor ever.
mrtruthify 2 months ago
@mrtruthify How was that supposed to be a reply ? Everything you mentioned in here is stupid and non factual theory's based on linguistics that simply doesnt make sense. "This nation, if you remove several letters sounds slighty like Israel and therefore is is now a fact". And now that somebody tells you it is BS you are prolly gonna post some comment about how I'm "undermining your glorius ancestors" or that I "prolly never read anything about it myself". SMH
SpitViciouz 2 months ago
Also.. the "lost" tribes is a false translation. The Hebrew wording is EXILED, not "lost".
Greeks-Saxons- Germanic tribes ARE ALL ISAACS SONS (SAX-ONS.. SACS-SONS.. ISACS-SONS, aka ISRAEL).
mrtruthify 3 months ago
@mrtruthify I have read some crap in my life, but you sir take the biscut.
TheFionuir 6 days ago
Well. I think I'll let the history books do the talking. As for clowns such as yourself who have no idea.. you can be judaized all you wish. Your opinion is garbage. My comments are chock full of facts. By the way.. the Irish WELSH language is in fact Hebrew. Play an audio recording of Hebrew for a Welshman. Watch him explain it to you.
.
What is occurring in all white nations must really be a mystery to those like you. We would all be destroyed, if for your ingnorant kind.
mrtruthify 4 days ago
@mrtruthify I studied ancient Irish history for over 20 years.You are wrong on all accounts. I dont know what history books you are reading from and as far as I can see most people on this page seem to disagree with you and all seem to be Irish and Scots.
TheFionuir 4 days ago
@buckwats Thanks to the Seminal works of Simon James (1999) and Brian Sykes (2006) the term 'Celtic' can now be understood for the Victorian romantic idiocy that it is.
TheFatalInstinct1 4 months ago
@TheFatalInstinct1
"CELT" is HEBREW word for the STONE KNIFE USED TO CIRCUMSIZE ISRAELITE MEN.
IRISH/SCOT WELSH STILL READ HEBREW QUITE WELL.
WELSH IS IN FACT HEBREW....AND THE EUROPEAN MAN IS THE ADAMIC MAN, ISRAEL.
mrtruthify 3 months ago
@mrtruthify Scots are not Irish and have nothing to do with the Scots, that is a papist lie.
Calengela 3 months ago
@mrtruthify Irish are not Scots and Scots are not Irish. They are as distinctly different from each as the Welsh and Irish are.
The ancient word 'Scot' is believed to be derived from 'Scythia'.
The Scots are by far and large Caledonian Pict.
Scottish land and population history also pre-dates Ireland's by at least 4,000 years.
Google: "14,000 year old hunting kit found in Scotland".
segano1 2 months ago
@segano1
I could really care less what your secular judaized book tells you. You understand a sparse history related in geographical terms. I know a history of far greater antiquity.. And even the village foll might know the linguistically connections. You have become the fool of judaizers, accepting geographical designations for Ethnic ties. Same genes.. same blood.. of the same tribes (originally).. same people. When you learn to stop associating flesh with dirt.. u will have truth.
mrtruthify 2 months ago
@mrtruthify What are you trying to say?, because you basically post King Robert I of Scots quote which proves I'm right.
segano1 1 month ago
@segano1
Remain ignorant or see my channel. I could really care less.
mrtruthify 2 months ago
@segano1
Even the Edomite, Canaanite, Khazarian (Mongolian) "jews" know quite well who Israel really is.
The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol 12, Page 249: "the identification of the
'Sacae, or "Sythians", with the Ten Tribes because they appear in history
at the same time, and very nearly the same place, as the Israelites
removed by (Assyrian King) Shalmaneser".
'Brit-ish', is a Hebrew transliteration, meaning, "People (or Men) [of the]
Covenant "
mrtruthify 2 months ago
@mrtruthify Once again you fail to post ANY sort of evidence for your claims. According to you fucks EVERYTHING is a hebrew transliteration. And you always post your shit as if it was the most factual piece of information ever. Becouse SOME book said so. There is a reason why you post these things here on youtube instead of writing a book, or holding lectures at oxford. But its probably just the oxford types who are too small minded to understand your grand revelations
SpitViciouz 2 months ago
Levi is perhaps the easiest modern nation to identify, it retains a legal
name that matches her ancient tribe.
Switzerland's legal name is the Confederation of the Helvetti. The last term
in the name is a Helenized form of the root word "Lvetti." That word, in
turn, is simply a respelling of the voweless Hebrew name LVT, or LeViTe.
Also, in Hebrew, the H prefix means "the."
Switzerland is thus, the "Confederation of the Levites."
mrtruthify 2 months ago
"We know, Most Holy Father & Lord, & from the chronicles and books of the
ancients gathered, that among other illustrious nations, ours, to wit the nation of the Scots, has been distinguished by many honors; which passing from the greater Scythia through the Mediterranean Sea & the pillars of Hercules & sojourning in Spain through a long course of time & coming thence 1,200 years after the outgoing of the people of Israel." Robert the Bruce, Declaration of Scotland (can still be seen).
mrtruthify 2 months ago
@segano1 you are wrong in this the anicent inhabitants of scotland were the picts. 'Scot' comes frome the Scotti a celtic tribe who invaded from ulster look up the estabilhment of the kingdom of dalriada
tecphobe 5 days ago
@tecphobe No, I am right, don't bother with the same comments, I've heard them a million times before.
The Scots were always indigenous to Scotland/Caledonia, that's why the foundation of the Church there was based on the Isle of Iona (Western Caledonia/Scotland).
Google: "Irish tribesmen the Scots did not come from Ireland",
Dál Riata started in Scotland and expanded into Ulster in the time of Christ, hence why the Capital, Dunadd, was in Scotland and not Ulster.
segano1 4 days ago
@segano1 Scots where" Picts" and the Irish "Celts" - is that correct?
mowgdog 4 days ago
@tecphobe 'Celtic' was first coined by Welsh linguist Edward Lhuyd in 1707 only to group old languages from across the British isles and parts of continental Europe and the East.
Heavily romanticised in the 1800s, by the 19th century, the term was hi-jacked by Irish republicans who used the term as a political tool to resist 'British-ness' during the height of the Irish republican movement, they did this by trying to re-define the term as an ethnic one, when all it was, was a linguist grouping.
segano1 4 days ago
@tecphobe Thanks to the seminal works of Simon James (1999) and Brian Sykes (2006), the term 'Celtic' can be understood for the Victorian romantic idiocy that it is.
Hence, it's fake, used for all the wrong reasons and romanticised as a collective singular grouping of a distinct people, when it couldn't actually be any further from the truth in reality.
segano1 4 days ago
@segano1
"Celt" was a name used by ROME. They called their land "Celtica" (it's Latin). You clearly have a great deal of trouble with judaizers in history.. from the real history in books centuries older. No wonder people like you are so confused. Rather than go to the source and make an independent determination.. you rely on other to think for you. You might learn a basic understanding of linguistics. It really cuts through the garbage quite effectively. Its almost as good as DNA.
mrtruthify 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@diekerel Sarmatians are Iranians and Alans.
They are also called Saracens and they do invade most of Europe and are mentioned in many parts of it.
They were Sarmatian allies of the Romans. That's it. They were not Scythians, who were still enemies of Rome and different people alltogether.
Sarmatians / Alans are not white, they're semitic.
Scythians are white, and nomadic.
Soveraine 3 months ago
Comment removed
Kamibambiraptor 7 months ago
Great video.
Natalie851000 8 months ago
This is absolutely RIGHT !! Nice video, thx for uploading !
IdelUralState 9 months ago
orginal UK R1a1 not R1b - this is code from egypt faraon tutenhamon.
Real name from you king Artur - Anthyr son of Alexander Great
vikibell2006 9 months ago
This also links to the name Alan, as alot of scottish and irish use this name. One tribe branched of scythia were called Alans or Alanians. This could prove something.
SeeN0More 9 months ago
@SeeN0More Never ever really thought of making that link, and yes your very right, One must look more into this.Thanks
FillHipLips 9 months ago
1:07 thats not northern iran, their kurdish.
SeeN0More 9 months ago
Celts and Picts are our Iranic brothers?
SeeN0More 9 months ago
@SeeN0More
No,Celts and Picts(pre celtic)were previously Maykop R1b,1st cousins of the indo iranians R1a,but not indo iranians,both come from the Proto indo europeans,so they are deeply related nevertheless.
StellandBlood 8 months ago
@StellandBlood indeed my droog , you are very correct
FillHipLips 8 months ago
I didn't really mean to get off track on a long-winded conversation on the origin of the celts. My only point was that anything resembling a tartan or kilt that is over 3000 years old either means that...
1) Similar clothing developed by a separate culture. It might only look like a tartan.
2) The mummies aren't 3000 years old.
It seems odd that a popular item of clothing would be found on a mummy predating the use of it by so long. Might have the same source though I don't know kilt history.
MasterAsra 10 months ago
@MasterAsra LOOK at the test results and seew king tut has R1B dna WOW
dagnab1 9 months ago
@MetallicThor
Oh, sorry - I got confused here. I've done further research, and you, my friend, are correct. I recently upgraded my Celtic history books, since the one I used here was written in 1980 :).
You are correct, they are of Indo-European origin.
celticbattleaxe 11 months ago
@MetallicThor I was referring to the Irish Celts. The majority of the Celts, however, are Indo-European. Re-check the history of the Phoenicians - as far as I know, they are Indos.
celticbattleaxe 11 months ago
This makes me even more proud to have Celtic and Iranic ancestry. We are all Indo-European brothers.
xabamsar 11 months ago
Dont belive the red hair shit.Nearly every mummy in Egypt has red hair,they were like wtf about this but it was proven its just some chemical change that occurs on dead mummificed bodies,so red haired mummies,while they were alive had most probably different hair color.
Illidanee 1 year ago
@Illidanee Red hair was actually a Norse trait that the Vikings brought with them when they migrated to S-E Ireland, and the reason Scotland has that 13% red haired population is due to the large migration of Irish who came to S-W Scotland and particularly east Glasgow to escape the famine.
Calengela 11 months ago
@Calengela There are boys from Iran in this video who have red hair, does that mean they have Norse ancestry as well?
xabamsar 11 months ago
@xabamsar - Yes good question, They boys have red hair, but their traits and blood is indo iranian not Norse Yet have red hair, One can not say that only Norse carry Red Hair in their blood, Some North iranians have shown to have red, but are NOT Germanic by blood,.. What does this Show ?
FillHipLips 11 months ago
@Steini224 That too, yes :). There were so many large Germanic tribes across Europe, since they were, after all, the Old Europeans. The Slavs, Dacians (before Romans took it over), Alemanni, Saxons, Jutes, Franks, Visigoths, Ostrogoths, Cimbri, and the Teutones were all Old Europeans.
celticbattleaxe 1 year ago
@celticbattleaxe Kilts on mummies is ridiculous. It's probably all just BS if that's the case, since if you look at celtic history you'd notice that kilts originated in the 16th century and were NEVER worn before that. Not only that but until recently no other celtic countries have ever worn kilts.
It's actually an argument against them being celtic, and shows that if it was supposed to be a kilt, it was probably put there by someone or is all just some sham by someone who didn't do research.
MasterAsra 10 months ago
@MasterAsra I am Irish by the way. But a red haired mummy in ancient China is believable. But if it has anything resembling a kilt on, it just seems fishy to me, like someone said that later to spur some sort of racism or other silliness or for PR purposes.
MasterAsra 10 months ago
@MasterAsra Sorry to contradict you, but you are wrong: the earliest tartan in Europe was dated to the 900s and was a combo of two colors. Yes, the family tartan kilts (as far as we know) and the highland unit kilts were designed in the 1600s. I doubt anyone would "sham" it. Why would they?
celticbattleaxe 10 months ago
@celticbattleaxe Ehhh, the same way people try to say all of the Egyptian pharoahs or those who built the pyramids were white, or other things like that. It was pretty common at one point to just say white people were responsible for everything.
Also, since the kilts are Scottish, even if they were first made in 900, that still doesn't explain why they're on 3000 year old mummies, since they didn't exist for thousands of years, and even when they did they were strictly a Scottish thing.
MasterAsra 10 months ago
@celticbattleaxe Though to be fair, it is fairly common to find red hair on mummies, though there are chemical processes which can make them that color, depending on the types of preservation techniques used. Even htough they probably weren't Han Chinese(since they weren't in Western China at that point), there are other ethnic groups that do have red hair around the area, such as persians or even the old Tocharians.
Celts in britain have lived there for 20k years(mostly in Wales).
MasterAsra 10 months ago
@MasterAsra Cont. Some groups do have history from mainland Europe back when there was a landbridge there, such as the picts, but even if it is true, it's weird to think of a group with no known written language(none of the ancient celtic tribes had any forms of writing system before the Romans appeared) would have managed to go all the way to ancient China and be entombed there.
It's POSSIBLE, though a 3000 year old mummy with a tartan is confusing historically. No brit burial mounds have em.
MasterAsra 10 months ago
@MasterAsra I don't really LIKE spamming comments but there's one other thing aside from no ancient celtic burial mounds that old having tartans(any that old, I mean. At least none found yet).As to celtic people, red hair has never been too dominant among any celtic tribe I think. Yet all the mummies(as far as I know) buried there has red hair. It'd seem more likely to have been intentionally made red, either from the hair being treated with something metallic and then rusting or similar things.
MasterAsra 10 months ago
@MasterAsra NOT true THEY HAD MUCH writting they will not reviel it to nonceltic people OGHOLM AND RUNIC and PICTISH SWIRL ASWELL AS GLIFS THEY WHERE IN EGYPT AND TOUGHT LANGUAGE AS THEY WHERE PRESENT AT BABYL LEARN LEARN LEARN MORE druidic knowlage is the base of egyptian and many other mystery schools celts are hyperborian as well as other tribes who are related tut has r1B dna look at the keltic cloth every where the ido-aryans where do the math
dagnab1 9 months ago
@MasterAsra Hmmmm... not all in Wales. That happened mainly from the Saxon and Roman invasions. Many Pretannic tribes moved north to the Picts, while others, like the Brigantes, moved to Eirinn. Wales was, however, a major trade point between Eirinn and Albion.
celticbattleaxe 10 months ago
@celticbattleaxe Yeah, then when the Anglo-Saxons arrived the Brythonic people left and went to places like Britanny and Galicia. That's why you've got similar cultures to Wales in Britanny and Cornwall while the Scottish and Irish Gaelic cultures are so similar. The first fossilized people 20,000 years ago during the end of the last ice age were found in Wales is what I meant, since some people like to talk about the celts from mainland Europe going to Britain over a land bridge much later.
MasterAsra 10 months ago
@MasterAsra OK - thanks for clarifying your statement :)
celticbattleaxe 10 months ago
@celticbattleaxe Yeah it was a bit preachy and I was tired when I originally wrote them so I might just delete the nonessential ones. Sorry about that.
MasterAsra 10 months ago
@MasterAsra Aw, it's OK. I'm used to it :)
To be honest, I wish I could type more in these text boxes.
celticbattleaxe 10 months ago
I have no doubt that the Celts spread that far and originated from the Scythians. There has been recent archaeological evidence in a burial ground of ancient Chinese wearing kilts. Yes, kilts. WITH A TARTAN.
It seems more likely with the Celts being related to the Greeks, and that the Germans were more related to the Scythians since they were true Indo Europeans. Not to piss off my Celtic brothers and sisters here, but the Germans were the Old Europeans. The Celts came later, but not by much.
celticbattleaxe 1 year ago
@celticbattleaxe There also seems to be conusion about the difference between Celt and German/Indo European. The facts are, that the Indo Europeans were the ancestors of BOTH Celts and Germans, and also the Greeks. The Phonecians can also be considered Indo Europeans. It i just more correct (exact) to say that the Celts were of Greek descent, but they were Indo European as well. I say "true" Indo Europeans are the Germans since they are more directly related.
celticbattleaxe 1 year ago
@celticbattleaxe Indeed the Celts have been traced to be of the same Indo - Iranians.
It has been scientific proven by Scientists, Archeologists and Historians.
No doubt about Celts are descended from The Iranian Aryan Scythians.
Even Germans and others such as Croatians, Slavs like Russians and Ukranians and some Poles,
have been traced to descend from the Aryan or Iranic Tribes like
The Sarmatians, Scythians and Alans.
They are the same Indo - Iranians or Iranic or Aryan peoples.
Natalie851000 8 months ago
@celticbattleaxe All this have been scientific and historical proven by
worldwide Scientists, Archeologists and Historians. I personally have talk to many different people
who are well educated Historians or are educated in Martial Arts and Computer Science,
and who all told me these things.
Funny enough if I never asked, I would never have found out about these things.
New Science and Archeology will show new proves always. If only they are not based on
ZIONIST PROPAGANDA.
Natalie851000 8 months ago
@Natalie851000 Well, it takes time and research, as you elegantly pointed out. I studied under TGE Powell for this info, as well as Dr. Ian Barnes. It's as close to facts as we can get.
celticbattleaxe 8 months ago
@celticbattleaxe These facts I told u, r the truth and have been shown. I have talked to various educated people who told me the same.
Besides please watch the video named, Arab Sources, Persian Gulf by Kuroosh1990.
Natalie851000 8 months ago
@Natalie851000 And I have no problem with that; all I am saying is what was said/written and still is being said/written by historians and archaeologists. It is still up for debate - the truth is that we don't know everything we'd like to know about. There are always debates in history, and this makes it interesting to study.
celticbattleaxe 8 months ago
@celticbattleaxe Yes agree with you, but most people are not like that and even deny the many facts
proven, and many Scientists have proven what I have said here.
One can always debate but I have personally seen many peoples, dening facts and made up their own
History, simply because they do not like to hear the truth.
And those who have power deny their original roots and make their own History and claims.
Many Scientists have proven many Europeans to have Iranic roots. Not all but many.
Natalie851000 8 months ago
@celticbattleaxe I think I once saw a map of the Iranian Sarmatians and Scythians living in the Steppes
and then they showed how Celts migrated from there westward and one very educated man said
if anyone told me the Celts were not apart of the same Indo - Iranians, then they are full of crap.
Also because he himself experienced many Irish and people from England, telling him, they were related.
Iranics can be found in other places too such as the Croatians, Slavs like Russians, Ukranians
Natalie851000 8 months ago
@celticbattleaxe ...Poles. Slavs have absorbed greatly many Iranic elements because
the Iranic or Aryan peoples lived in the Steppes at that time.
So they mixed heavily with these Iranics and therefore Slavs are one and the same Iranian peoples
as the Iranians of today.
I personally talked to an Ukranian and a Russian and a Pole and even Croatians, and none of them
were in denial in this subject since Scientists have proven them to be Iranics or Aryans.
Natalie851000 8 months ago
@celticbattleaxe The Ukranian himself though he was not such a loyal Iranic or Aryan fellow and also
very rude in his speech on Iranian videos and also on PM's, got angry and told me, the Slavs were of the
same Aryan or Iranic people as the Iranians, and that I should have leart history in the correct order.
Which is true and I think all people should do the very same instead of claiming and making their own
history claims out of the blue.
I agree with you as long people don't deny History
Natalie851000 8 months ago
@Natalie851000 Oh, denying history makes me sick. I almost beat-up someone in my high school (yeah - I don't graduate "officially" until the 24th of this month :( ) who said out loud that 9/11 was a lie. The only thing stopping me was the fact that there were hundreds of people already in the hallways (my high school has about 2800 students - no joke there). I still wish I at least knocked him hard against the lockers.
celticbattleaxe 8 months ago
@celticbattleaxe Indeed. But people when it comes to history, they distort it and deny it and want to
racially degrade others to full extent. It hurts and I fight. They steal and distort not just the Iranian History
but also all others and steal from people and call it their own.
It is mostly offensive and when I see it's own people, betraying themselves, then I do not know what to think or do.
Natalie851000 8 months ago
@Natalie851000 So true - this is the problem with opinions being confused with fact. This is also why epistemological philosophy is great :). Just because you believe something does not necessarily make it true, and something true does not necessarily have to be what you believe. But, if you put your mind to something, the impossible can be totally possible. I agree with you 100%.
celticbattleaxe 8 months ago
@celticbattleaxe Piss of Plastic Paddie, what would a dumb Yankee cunt know...
TheFatalInstinct1 7 months ago
@TheFatalInstinct1 A lot more than a pompous imperialistic jackass like you, dickie :)
I respect the UK (especially the Royal Marines helping us in the Mid East), but you sound like a common man-slut who got kicked out of a Scottish pub and crawled back to London.
Two can play your game, and I highly suggest you don't include me.
Cherio, 'ol chappie!!!!
celticbattleaxe 7 months ago
@celticbattleaxe Where ever did I say I was English? You poofy bastard Plastic Paddie Yankee Doodle Cunt.
Do you some how think only English call you Yanks as Plastic people?
You'd get your fat DUMB bastard Yank face BATTARD in a Scottish bar just because of your Yank rhetoric, personality and annoying Yankee Doodle accent.
Do you seriously think that you walking about with an accent like that makes people see you as one of them? LMFAO! Get the fuck out of here ya Yank bastard.
TheFatalInstinct1 7 months ago
@TheFatalInstinct1 You act like one, moron!! Secondly, you spelled "battered" wrong, and furthermore, if I went to a Scottish pub, I'd be welcomed. Why? A little thing called RESPECT, perhaps a term you aren't familiar with :), and because of my ancestry (ie Gordon highlanders).
Do you have ANY idea how many Scots and Irish moved to America, Nova Scotia, and Canada? That's how I'm related, jackass.
BTW, I'm not "done yet" - I'm going to sit here and watch you get blocked.
celticbattleaxe 7 months ago
@TheFatalInstinct1 big man !! eh wan mare comment or pathetic banter your yabbering and yar blocked
FillHipLips 7 months ago
@celticbattleaxe You'll always be a Yank and nothing else, no matter how much you try to learn about our nations, no matter how long and hard you try to not be a Yank we don't give a fuck about your nation but you obsess about ours, just goes to show your fucked up overly romanticised badly outdated view of other peoples nations far far away from Yankeeland, it just makes you even more of a Yank, your bulk of your far distant ancestors are Hillbilly red neck pre Yankee Canuck cunts.
TRUTH HURTS
TheFatalInstinct1 7 months ago
@TheFatalInstinct1 I don't obsess about the UK, but I respect their military highly.
You know what hurts? Finding out that someday ahead, you account has been blocked permanently!! :)
Troll me all you want - it doesn't do crap to me except make you a target for my friends.
celticbattleaxe 7 months ago
@TheFatalInstinct1 you are very ignorant and clearly have issues, their are 5 million scots in scotland but 20 million est. people of scots decent through out the world mainly settled in canada ie nova scotia ie new scotland, america, austratlia, nothern ireland who are you to deny them their history. Granted some left these shores of their own accord but that alone does not deny them a right to their history and what of the the many forcibly removed ie highland clearence. read a book or two.
scotswaha 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheFatalInstinct1 you are very ignorant and clearly have issues, their are 5 million scots in scotland but 20 million est. people of scots decent through out the world mainly settled in canada ie nova scotia ie new scotland, america, austratlia, nothern ireland who are you to deny them their history. Granted some left these shores of their own accord but that alone does not deny them a right to their history and what of the the many forcibly removed ie highland clearence. read a book or two.
scotswaha 4 months ago
@celticbattleaxe Keep your Yankee race and Yank nose out of business and away from our nation.
You aren't even from the same continent you Yank alien fuck.
Yanks = intellectually inferior Plastic People.
TheFatalInstinct1 7 months ago
@TheFatalInstinct1 Uh, excuse me, I am most definitely NOT a Yankee fan - Mets any day.
Shithead, I'm not descended from the English. I am a mix of Scottish, Irish and Welsh (with a little Native American as well). I respect my ancestors more than you have ever respected your mom.
You are making you nation look like a piece of crap by acting this way. Sit down and shut up.
Explain why Americans are "intellectually inferior" - clearly, you have NEVER been here, dickie.
Cherio 'ol chappie! :)
celticbattleaxe 7 months ago 2
sakas-sarmatians-scythians-alans all were iranian
fuckturks2223 1 year ago
@MrAzerbaijan1 scythians were iranian
iranian is a old word
but not the word iran
they spoke iranian language
mongoloid negroid pig
the scythians spoke iranian language dumbfuck
fuckturks2223 1 year ago
@MrAzerbaijan1 Iranian tribe. This whole Pan-Turkist policy of yours is laughed upon by scholars and historians.
Marduniya 1 year ago
to romanticised. nonethe less interesting.
49128 1 year ago
Like it, like it a lot. Good job.
seanamico 1 year ago
good video man
TabbyAngel2 1 year ago