he explains that there are an equal number of electrons as protons in every atom for example in hydrogen there is 1 proton so there must be one electron, but how do you determine how many neutrons are in each element? is there a way of telling how many neutrons are in an atom by knowing how many protons/electrons there are?
To finish what he was saying: On the insides of stars. Stars can only make elements up to Iron in their lifetime, but it's when they explode as a supernova, do temperatures get even hotter and then iron is able to fuse with more helium and thereby are able to form more complex elements.
So we are all made from "star stuff" as Carl likes to say
@Shadow194 Giant stars fuse elements from H (Helium) up to Fe (Iron) during the end of their life. Once the iron has fused, no other heavier element may be fused and so, depending on the chandrasekhar limit the star will explode and become either a neutron star or black hole. Once the star goes supernova, only then are temeperatures hot enough to allow further, heavier elements to begin fusion including lead.
@Shadow194 Giant stars fuse elements from H (Helium) up to Fe (Iron) during the end of their life. Once the iron has fused, no other heavier element may be fused and so, depending on the chandrasekhar limit the star will explode and become either a neutron star or black hole. Once the star goes supernova, only then are temperatures hot enough to allow further, heavier elements to begin fusion including lead.
I come to this video because I love Sagan's intellect and come to learn about atoms. It's so pathetic how religious stupid ape-people come here to start arguing and the stupid atheist how follow their game. My fellow atheist brothers: Just ignore the stupid fucks...it is the best thing to do.
Someone has probably already asked this, but was that little pellet of uranium depleted? I mean, I don't think he was picking up a radioactive material encased in glass with tongs. Anyway, I was just curious
One amazing indication to how amazing scientific advancment is is less than a century seperates not even knowing atoms really existing to knowing of particles quintillions of times smaller, knowing one or two levels below the atoms, knowing the rough number of atoms in the known universe, how many kinds there are and actually seeing some of them and this happened across two world wars, a genocide, economic collapses and general attacks one this knowledge.
wait...pythagorean didn't believe that everytime is made by numbers (everything is made biy the idea " how much it has"),?
awesome lesons, i freaked out when you can't understand what he says almost at the end of the video and a few seconds before, its really important to understand the nuclear force, just the fact that the nuclear force can overcome the repulsion of the atomic particles, amuse me
I went through all of high school seeing that stupid chart on the wall. And it took Carl Sagan and youtube to finally explain it to me. I think I had some bad science teachers in my public school experience. Not that I was the best student, but they did a very poor job of making the topics interesting. If Carl was my science teacher I would have been a scientist and not a lawyer. Instead, I spent my life in education avoiding science and math thinking it was boring. Boy, was I wrong...
I had forgotten all about these basics of science since leaving school but Carl Sagan continues to teach and allow people like me to learn about and rediscover science. This man is a legend.
HE IS DEAD, JUST IN CASE YOU DID NOT KNOW.......... YOU WOULD HAVE KILLED HIM IF HE KNEW YOU ASKED THAT. PLEASE DO NOT DESECRATE WITH SUCH HORRIBLE QUESTION.
@GabrielGroverMan.... HIS REMAINS ARE IN A CEMENTARY, UNDERGROUND, IN NEW YORK. I SUPPOSE 'PLEASANT' IS IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER. PERSONALLY, DEAD AND BURIED IN THE GROUND NO MATER WHAT STATE IT IS IS FAR FROM A PLEASANT PLACE.... AGAIN HE IS DEAD.
I love how Sagan enunciates some of the elements. Especially the mispronunciation of Dysprosium (leaving out the first "s" and using a high "y"), and the elongated emphasis on Praseodymium.
Interestingly, the first - but not second - appearance it has in this segment, before being pushed aside by Victorian music, seems to have more ornamentation than the official version.
If I had had a chance to watch Carl Sagan's video, I would have gone into Physics and fell in love with this subject for good...anyway, never too late to fall in love with a subject... or... shall we say "knowledge"?
Ive always wondered: if these elements were made by fusing simpler atoms together, why is there more iron than say, lithium in the universe? iron is a lot heavier and should therefore be more difficult to make right?
Turning Mercury to Gold seems so trivial ;^} . It's almost miraculous that adjacent elements on the Periodic Table can have such fantastically different properties.
In the insides of the... STARS!!! watch?v=neMEo8ZrwuI for more info.
It speaks terribly of how bad our education system is that such an important, astonishing and even wonderful and poetic FACT is not known for most people. As Neil DeGrasse Tyson once said it makes me want to grab people on the street and say HAVE YOU HEARD THIS!!!??
@technicallyabsurd I'm sure he means "observable" matter. Were dark matter and energy known about our suspected at the time that he made this?? Surely alarm bells were ringing in someone's measurements.
@1PintLasher Now that you mention it, dark matter was theorized in the time of Einstein and Hubble when the true scale of the Universe was realized. So yeah, my bad.
00:12 to 00:50 - kinda looks like the universe, galaxies clustered together with 'nothingness' inbetween. But in the wrong direction (small vs. large)
Perhaps, given more time (and stars), there will be natural elements more complex than Uranium. I wonder if a natural 94-proton element would be just as dangerous as man-made Plutonium.
no stars exist large enough to make uranium, to become massive enough to produce the heat required, they would collapse into black holes, they simply cant exist.
@shackupyourstruly: The only thing you could change would be number of neutrons. Yes, that changes radioactivity, so I guess it's just possible to find a less dangerous isotope. Still, any atom that large can be expected to be highly radioactive no matter what number of neutrons it has.
@marasu66: I'm hoping you're being facetious. In-case you're not, the way I see it is this: "Mother-nature", if said being exists, seems content to follow certain rules without making any aberrant decisions whatsoever. Within the scope of these rules, every-thing I just said stands.
@rubbermuck Shut the fuck up you atheist ass hole, I hav no prob with u and your "beliefs" or lack of them but don't pick on a guy just cuz he believs and u dont
@safster4 Excuse me. I made an assumption that a person watching Carl Sagan was non-religious. As "thank god" is a common expression even amongst non-believers, I thought I was being helpful in correcting an automatic reaction that was actually incongruous with their own views on life.
I wish you no harm or offense, I just didn't think the Christian bible said anything on the subject of the internet.
Have you seen the entirety of Cosmos? I recommend it very much, it's a great series.
@shamz0rz Some people, and when it suits them keeping their religion. That doesn't mean that all Christians are isolated from our cultural pool, which contains Carl Sagan, and that everyone who likes Carl Sagan is an atheist.
@shamz0rz But you did say all - you assumed everyone watching this was going to be atheist. So that's where you made the leap before, from your opinion of the religious as willfully ignorant, as opposed to a science and Carl Sagan loving atheist. Group persona.
@LokiClock You are really stretching here pal. Re-read my comments. I'm not the guy you were originally talking to. Never said all, and to deny the willful ignorance of a majority of the religious community to scientific advancement is... well... ignorant.
@shamz0rz Well I wasn't asking you, so why did you respond? I didn't deny the validity of the opinion, I just pointed out that it was an opinion and (having assumed you were the same person) that it lead to an error of reasoning. Thus it should be scrutinized. Since it's your opinion and you're using it to justify the reasoning, your opinion is in error anyway.
we try and recreat similer forms of fission in massive reactor but we havent quite perfected it yet we seem to put way more energy into the fuison and we get out of it
The ramifications and the enlightenment we gain from this extraordinary account of the structure of matter is most refreshing and simple, which is more than I can say for my comment!
OMG! You have made my understanding a lot easier. It's so amazing by visibility of the actual elements shown. Very awesome all videos should be like this...
he explains that there are an equal number of electrons as protons in every atom for example in hydrogen there is 1 proton so there must be one electron, but how do you determine how many neutrons are in each element? is there a way of telling how many neutrons are in an atom by knowing how many protons/electrons there are?
87TheProdigy87 2 days ago
I bump into raziodynum all the time, there's some at the local Walmart.
walmartpimp2 5 days ago
I wish Mr Sagan was my Chemistry teacher, I may have become something in life as he explains it all so well
leokimvideo 2 weeks ago
he was the best
MartinGianola 1 month ago
correct word is detect no? or can we actually see them?
Bomberdoom 1 month ago
Comment removed
lunchboxxxxxxxxx 1 month ago
It's funny to hear him talk about this stuff and never mentions quarks.
atomicwave 2 months ago
hahaha that's horrible the way it ends!
To finish what he was saying: On the insides of stars. Stars can only make elements up to Iron in their lifetime, but it's when they explode as a supernova, do temperatures get even hotter and then iron is able to fuse with more helium and thereby are able to form more complex elements.
So we are all made from "star stuff" as Carl likes to say
LoungeFly02 2 months ago
@LoungeFly02 Btw he says Lead, not iron :p
Shadow194 1 month ago
@Shadow194 Giant stars fuse elements from H (Helium) up to Fe (Iron) during the end of their life. Once the iron has fused, no other heavier element may be fused and so, depending on the chandrasekhar limit the star will explode and become either a neutron star or black hole. Once the star goes supernova, only then are temeperatures hot enough to allow further, heavier elements to begin fusion including lead.
LoungeFly02 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Shadow194 Giant stars fuse elements from H (Helium) up to Fe (Iron) during the end of their life. Once the iron has fused, no other heavier element may be fused and so, depending on the chandrasekhar limit the star will explode and become either a neutron star or black hole. Once the star goes supernova, only then are temperatures hot enough to allow further, heavier elements to begin fusion including lead.
LoungeFly02 1 month ago
In the inside of stars.
GRAVEROTT 2 months ago
Then came dark matter
Marictdude 3 months ago
wats dem music
Loyadd 3 months ago
@Loyadd The soundtrack for Cosmos features only pure, uncut, Columbian Vangelis. Er... he's not Columbian. But you get the idea.
7j8i9m 3 months ago
Carl you are a legend
RonnocRetep 3 months ago
Insides of the stars...
youdontknowxpand 3 months ago
In the insides of the Holy Grail?
What.... wrong answer? *smug face*
seahawk124 3 months ago
I come to this video because I love Sagan's intellect and come to learn about atoms. It's so pathetic how religious stupid ape-people come here to start arguing and the stupid atheist how follow their game. My fellow atheist brothers: Just ignore the stupid fucks...it is the best thing to do.
RichtoffenRoach 4 months ago
Inside of the Stars, i think hehe
earlisto132 4 months ago
whhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaatttt???????????????
whhhhaaaattttt is it!!!!!!!!!!
ih8pinkos 4 months ago
In the insides of stars, like our sun
MegaBEANER1000 5 months ago
Heads up guys a sequel to Sagan's cosmos is planned for a 2013 release and will be hosted by Neil degrasse tyson.
misinglink15 5 months ago 3
@misinglink15 epiiiic
Pronoun8472 5 months ago
2 people believe in God...
mtanyc 5 months ago 2
Bromine seems prety chill. MLIB
LuceoLeo 6 months ago
Carl was great at explaining things, he was a great teacher!
lazzielazzie 6 months ago
Yeaaa I always knew Mercury is A KInd of Gold, If u know what I mean
how I love Sagan
Stefan1527 6 months ago
look at the black board before this clip he explained the googleplex!!
Stefan1527 6 months ago
LOL He really had to be carefull about that uranium piece.
jcorlettbr 7 months ago
we are made from starstuff :)
i love it
aPpLeJuIcE37RainLucy 7 months ago
His voice makes me tear up.
BallerzTV 8 months ago
ah finally the best part about school, naptime
Wiigameguy 8 months ago
he just HAS uranium??? i hope thats a near dead piece, Carl Sagan is like radiation? w/e.
iaminside1 9 months ago
Carl Sagan makes it rain, what a badass
sweeppickable 9 months ago
its amazing how far weve come and how much we know now compared to when this video was made. go on sagan, R.I.P.
mcRioRemedy 9 months ago
1:32 NOOOOO!!!!
tacoyum6 10 months ago
Someone has probably already asked this, but was that little pellet of uranium depleted? I mean, I don't think he was picking up a radioactive material encased in glass with tongs. Anyway, I was just curious
randomclam898889 10 months ago
@randomclam898889 it was probly natural uranium ore . definitly not enriched uranium though
wowggscrub 10 months ago
@wowggscrub Oh okay, that makes sense
randomclam898889 10 months ago
IN THE INSIDES OF WHAT?!
Hamsammich111 10 months ago 52
@Hamsammich111 stars
wowggscrub 10 months ago
@Hamsammich111 Marcellus Wallace's briefcase!
georgek19 4 months ago
@Hamsammich111 Sarah Palin's behind
TanTanDaDude 4 months ago
@Hamsammich111 LMFAO
god damnit...
sun?
solar system? i think sun
VincentVega44 3 months ago
@Hamsammich111 The insides of the stars!
PruneJuiceInABag 2 months ago
One amazing indication to how amazing scientific advancment is is less than a century seperates not even knowing atoms really existing to knowing of particles quintillions of times smaller, knowing one or two levels below the atoms, knowing the rough number of atoms in the known universe, how many kinds there are and actually seeing some of them and this happened across two world wars, a genocide, economic collapses and general attacks one this knowledge.
RJL738 10 months ago
Sagan, protons and neutrons are NOT elementary particles. NOOB!
waksibra 11 months ago
@waksibra They were in 1980 before the level of quantum theory we have today.
pcusumano78 9 months ago
did he say Cambridge University?
Electroabel 11 months ago
wait...pythagorean didn't believe that everytime is made by numbers (everything is made biy the idea " how much it has"),?
awesome lesons, i freaked out when you can't understand what he says almost at the end of the video and a few seconds before, its really important to understand the nuclear force, just the fact that the nuclear force can overcome the repulsion of the atomic particles, amuse me
Electroabel 11 months ago
I like that blazer he's wearing.
babalooga65 11 months ago
the temperatures are common in the insides of what??? comets????
IRELANDISMYCOUNTRY 1 year ago
@IRELANDISMYCOUNTRY Stars
ladderfold 1 year ago
Comment removed
mpicanco 1 year ago
@IRELANDISMYCOUNTRY
Exploding stars.
aardwolf71 1 year ago
Fuck! Sorry, I just accidently disliked this video.
QuestionPerception 1 year ago
I just learnt more about chemistry today in 10 minutes than I did in 5 year of high school chem.
JordanPAT 1 year ago 2
I went through all of high school seeing that stupid chart on the wall. And it took Carl Sagan and youtube to finally explain it to me. I think I had some bad science teachers in my public school experience. Not that I was the best student, but they did a very poor job of making the topics interesting. If Carl was my science teacher I would have been a scientist and not a lawyer. Instead, I spent my life in education avoiding science and math thinking it was boring. Boy, was I wrong...
pab7984 1 year ago 2
I had forgotten all about these basics of science since leaving school but Carl Sagan continues to teach and allow people like me to learn about and rediscover science. This man is a legend.
imtheduke 1 year ago
i wonder where Carl Sagan is now...
GabrielGroverMan 1 year ago
@GabrielGroverMan
Hes passed away :(
mchltlt1037 1 year ago
@GabrielGroverMan science heaven
TheJimzhe842 1 year ago
HE IS DEAD, JUST IN CASE YOU DID NOT KNOW.......... YOU WOULD HAVE KILLED HIM IF HE KNEW YOU ASKED THAT. PLEASE DO NOT DESECRATE WITH SUCH HORRIBLE QUESTION.
parisruiz1 1 year ago
@parisruiz1 What is your problem?
CRISNCHIPS12398 1 year ago
@parisruiz1 i know he is dead. i wonder where he is now.... why is this a horrible question? you suggesting he is somewhere not pleasant?
GabrielGroverMan 1 year ago
@GabrielGroverMan.... HIS REMAINS ARE IN A CEMENTARY, UNDERGROUND, IN NEW YORK. I SUPPOSE 'PLEASANT' IS IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER. PERSONALLY, DEAD AND BURIED IN THE GROUND NO MATER WHAT STATE IT IS IS FAR FROM A PLEASANT PLACE.... AGAIN HE IS DEAD.
parisruiz1 1 year ago
@GabrielGroverMan He's dead there is no "where is he now" he's dead.....!!!!
cannywf1 11 months ago
@cannywf1 As another YouTuber wrote, and in the likeness of MIB; Carl Sagan isn't dead, he just went home.
impiccolomofo 11 months ago
I love how Sagan enunciates some of the elements. Especially the mispronunciation of Dysprosium (leaving out the first "s" and using a high "y"), and the elongated emphasis on Praseodymium.
59thElement 1 year ago
Like being taught Chemistry by Agent Smith.
magneticpickup 1 year ago
"In the insides of..." ...
DUN DUN DUN.
WE MAY NEVER KNOW O____O"".
...until, we read Slacker665's comment that is
thedeathskittle 1 year ago
i think that background soundtrack has grown on me
thedeathskittle 1 year ago
It is "Alpha", by Vangelis.
Interestingly, the first - but not second - appearance it has in this segment, before being pushed aside by Victorian music, seems to have more ornamentation than the official version.
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
WOW!!!!! Those viles landing standing up was quite impressive!
SoulSurferGS8 1 year ago
whats the song called at the start?
Jinclops 1 year ago
Best ending ever.
stuffedsonic 1 year ago 2
If I had had a chance to watch Carl Sagan's video, I would have gone into Physics and fell in love with this subject for good...anyway, never too late to fall in love with a subject... or... shall we say "knowledge"?
CPVYS 1 year ago
@CPVYS the subject he is talking about falls under chemistry
Anteep 1 year ago
On the insides... of YOUR MIND.
featuringfranklin 1 year ago
Ive always wondered: if these elements were made by fusing simpler atoms together, why is there more iron than say, lithium in the universe? iron is a lot heavier and should therefore be more difficult to make right?
also, gallium is my favorite element =)
fartx211 1 year ago
Maybe dropping the "Mother" part from "Mother Nature" will get you somewhere, @marasu66.
shackupyourstruly 1 year ago
Hehehe.... 'Elementary particles'...
AkiThePirate 1 year ago
...in the insides of the..STARS
redholmar 1 year ago 2
Turning Mercury to Gold seems so trivial ;^} . It's almost miraculous that adjacent elements on the Periodic Table can have such fantastically different properties.
marasu66 1 year ago
i wonder if angent smith's voice patern was based off of him
TiTSxxMcGEE 1 year ago
In the insides of the... STARS!!! watch?v=neMEo8ZrwuI for more info.
It speaks terribly of how bad our education system is that such an important, astonishing and even wonderful and poetic FACT is not known for most people. As Neil DeGrasse Tyson once said it makes me want to grab people on the street and say HAVE YOU HEARD THIS!!!??
cristianfcao 1 year ago
insides of the what?
I missed the most important part.
Karvante 1 year ago
LOL 1:17 it looks like crack!
Pahjx 1 year ago
whats the last word he was going to say? i am confused now :(
edde8282 1 year ago
"The Universe, all of it, everywhere, is 99.9% hydrogen and helium, the two simplest elements."
Ahh, how simple the Universe was before the discovery of dark matter and energy. I'd like to hear Sagan's counsel on it.
technicallyabsurd 1 year ago
@technicallyabsurd I'm sure he means "observable" matter. Were dark matter and energy known about our suspected at the time that he made this?? Surely alarm bells were ringing in someone's measurements.
1PintLasher 1 year ago
@1PintLasher Now that you mention it, dark matter was theorized in the time of Einstein and Hubble when the true scale of the Universe was realized. So yeah, my bad.
technicallyabsurd 1 year ago
I'm a huge fan of his prrraaaaseodyymiummmm at 3:37.
Carl is and shall always be the top of awesome.
What a guy!
MyrddinOtaku 1 year ago
00:12 to 00:50 - kinda looks like the universe, galaxies clustered together with 'nothingness' inbetween. But in the wrong direction (small vs. large)
MonkeyFunkR 1 year ago
Perhaps, given more time (and stars), there will be natural elements more complex than Uranium. I wonder if a natural 94-proton element would be just as dangerous as man-made Plutonium.
marasu66 1 year ago
no stars exist large enough to make uranium, to become massive enough to produce the heat required, they would collapse into black holes, they simply cant exist.
uranium is formed in super novea
muffinman2990 1 year ago
@muffinman2990 You need a star to get a supernova.
marasu66 1 year ago
@marasu66: It would be the exact same thing. 94 protons = Plutonium = deadly.
Eagle0600 1 year ago
@Eagle0600 Hmm. Maybe.... maybe not.
shackupyourstruly 1 year ago
@shackupyourstruly: The only thing you could change would be number of neutrons. Yes, that changes radioactivity, so I guess it's just possible to find a less dangerous isotope. Still, any atom that large can be expected to be highly radioactive no matter what number of neutrons it has.
Eagle0600 1 year ago
Maybe Mother Nature just knows how to make better superUranium elements?
marasu66 1 year ago
@marasu66: I'm hoping you're being facetious. In-case you're not, the way I see it is this: "Mother-nature", if said being exists, seems content to follow certain rules without making any aberrant decisions whatsoever. Within the scope of these rules, every-thing I just said stands.
Eagle0600 1 year ago
Aww, shoot! He got cut off before he could finish his sentence.
marasu66 1 year ago
that little piece of music in the background when he starts talking is perfectly fitting, just beautiful what Carl has created
FissionNonStop 2 years ago
How does Carl not collapse in weakness when around Krypton? He is Superman, after all. . .
MST3KLives 2 years ago 8
....stars
longfootbuddy 2 years ago 67
Errr-bee-um.
Awesome voice.
kitchenaut 2 years ago 4
very educational, i have missed out on school, but thank god i can learn online
Zee96969696 2 years ago 79
theres nobody better to learn from than Carl Sagan himself.
StuartHaitchXbox 2 years ago 4
@Zee96969696 I was just thinking the exact same thing.
mmmikeyxx 1 year ago
@Zee96969696 same :)
fermerwuvu 9 months ago
@Zee96969696 Thank god as you watch Carl Sagan lol. now that's funny
xXCirmsonRagexX 8 months ago 9
@Zee96969696 you mean thank science
rubbermuck 8 months ago
@rubbermuck Shut the fuck up you atheist ass hole, I hav no prob with u and your "beliefs" or lack of them but don't pick on a guy just cuz he believs and u dont
safster4 8 months ago
@safster4 Excuse me. I made an assumption that a person watching Carl Sagan was non-religious. As "thank god" is a common expression even amongst non-believers, I thought I was being helpful in correcting an automatic reaction that was actually incongruous with their own views on life.
I wish you no harm or offense, I just didn't think the Christian bible said anything on the subject of the internet.
Have you seen the entirety of Cosmos? I recommend it very much, it's a great series.
peace.
rubbermuck 8 months ago 3
@rubbermuck Have you thought about why would you make that assumption?
LokiClock 6 months ago
@LokiClock Likely because many religious people purposefully close themselves off from the scientific world because it shakes their faith.
shamz0rz 6 months ago
@shamz0rz Some people, and when it suits them keeping their religion. That doesn't mean that all Christians are isolated from our cultural pool, which contains Carl Sagan, and that everyone who likes Carl Sagan is an atheist.
LokiClock 5 months ago
@LokiClock Many religious people do that, I never said "all". Unfortunately willful ignorance is a trend in the religious community.
shamz0rz 5 months ago
@shamz0rz But you did say all - you assumed everyone watching this was going to be atheist. So that's where you made the leap before, from your opinion of the religious as willfully ignorant, as opposed to a science and Carl Sagan loving atheist. Group persona.
LokiClock 5 months ago
@LokiClock You are really stretching here pal. Re-read my comments. I'm not the guy you were originally talking to. Never said all, and to deny the willful ignorance of a majority of the religious community to scientific advancement is... well... ignorant.
shamz0rz 5 months ago
@shamz0rz Well I wasn't asking you, so why did you respond? I didn't deny the validity of the opinion, I just pointed out that it was an opinion and (having assumed you were the same person) that it lead to an error of reasoning. Thus it should be scrutinized. Since it's your opinion and you're using it to justify the reasoning, your opinion is in error anyway.
LokiClock 5 months ago
@rubbermuck
LOL BUUURRNNN..!!!
GuitarMannnnnn 8 months ago
@Zee96969696 don't thank God, thank Sagan! ^^
Richy15251 7 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
my girlfriend has a great black hole between here legs... nothing could escape it
Zee96969696 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Zee96969696
hahahahahaahahahahahaha
So does my girlfriend
hahahahhaahahaha
kingofnothing26 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Zee96969696 Thumbs up my man!
alwerks1 2 years ago
@alwerks1
Gamajh 2 years ago
@Gamajh
Hi there, What happened to your comment? I only see at alwerks1 below your name.
alwerks1 2 years ago
Yeah, I bet her black hole attracts all the dicks within an event horizon of 100 miles.
whiterottenrabbit 2 years ago
thats why shes not my girlfriend anymore
Zee96969696 2 years ago
@whiterottenrabbit
wat
Gamajh 2 years ago
Insides of stars, where nuclear fusion occurs.
johndobson01 2 years ago 4
we try and recreat similer forms of fission in massive reactor but we havent quite perfected it yet we seem to put way more energy into the fuison and we get out of it
childofreletivity 2 years ago
stars / suns...come on where is the rest? Why does it stop?
bethanybabe 2 years ago
on the insides of super novas
rolficus 2 years ago
probably in the inside of the suns..
I mean where esle can there be thousands of thousands of degrees warm :P.
ZoSo0207 2 years ago
stars
blackrabbitwhite 2 years ago 4
Such temperatures are common in nature. Where? in the insides of... and the video ends, dammit
Androrac 2 years ago 5
lol thinking the same thing
ryandashsdotorg 2 years ago 2
Now we'll never know!!
Kimbahley 2 years ago 3
was that real uranium?! no way
asseeninYOURDREAMS 2 years ago
yes. what, you expected to be green? it's actually grey
Androrac 2 years ago 2
I wasn't questioning its color. I was wondering how sagan could hold the glass so carelessly because I thought plutonium was very unstable.
asseeninYOURDREAMS 2 years ago
**uranium**
asseeninYOURDREAMS 2 years ago
plutonium is unstable. uranium is not.
Androrac 2 years ago
The ramifications and the enlightenment we gain from this extraordinary account of the structure of matter is most refreshing and simple, which is more than I can say for my comment!
large0ne 2 years ago
I say we vote on the coolest element.
I cast mine to Bismuth. It's pretty badass.
HelplessVictim 2 years ago
Tungsten is way cooler, dude.
KingKolunikus 2 years ago
facepalm.jpg
Ievolovel 2 years ago
geekium ;)
r0galik 2 years ago 2
Red shirt, tan jacket. For the win.
doctormurray91 2 years ago 3
IN THE INSIDES OF..
What a cocktease.
Eruonen 2 years ago
insides of the stars
alexzap2002 2 years ago 39
@alexzap2002 Thank You.
kaushiksays 1 year ago
@alexzap2002 The insides of you.
Boxrag 1 year ago
OMG! You have made my understanding a lot easier. It's so amazing by visibility of the actual elements shown. Very awesome all videos should be like this...
deddave818 2 years ago 5
all scientists should be like carl sagan, or at least all science teachers, wed destroy the myth of nerdy science right away
CrunkRockSteadyEvan 2 years ago
Not only is it easier to understand, it also helps prove it's existance (:
Q9R42 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DemocritusabdriibA
BritneyJeanspearsM 0:43
s t u c k i n u r t i m e
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
assium
avadakedavra62442 2 years ago
It the insides of YOU DON'T GET TO KNOW.
Triundi 2 years ago 7
i think he was going to say the sun.
wowggscrub 2 years ago
the big bang
bscutajar 2 years ago
Comment removed
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
Comment removed
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
Comment removed
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
Comment removed
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
Comment removed
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
Comment removed
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
Comment removed
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
Comment removed
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
very good clip...thanks=)
KamNcK 2 years ago
whats the name of that music
login001login001 2 years ago
Vangelis - Alpha i think
andreiduffy 2 years ago 4
Wow thats probably raeviliss`s whole vocabulary.
Kaarel314 3 years ago 2
I'm sure he received some help.
richiebabe24 3 years ago
lmao
Kujien 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NERDS
sophers222 3 years ago