Added: 1 year ago
From: Kennykpz1979
Views: 15,334
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (85)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Looks like a District 9 documentary.

  • darpa is just another money pit , they dont want to know about anything that they cant charge big bucks for , no matter how many lives it will save on the battle field , no matter how big an advantage it will give our military , no matter how much safer it would make certain types of troop insertion, if they cant charge the military a fortune for it then they dont want to even listen.

  • mgs4 became real

  • And then it realises its had enough of getting shot and rebuilt and turns on the people who made it. GOOD JOB AMERICA.

  • @JoshuaRAWRR sorry but america is not going to be around for too long. they are purposely ruining your country so lets see who the next victim is going to be...oh wait, we all are!

  • @smukase I'm not American.

  • @JoshuaRAWRR same shit different fucking day! u r white so u r all collectively responsible for this kind of crap because u all collectively disregard the rest of the world.

  • @smukase Safe to say that you're a retard.

  • @smukase Just us not by the color of our skin but by the content of our character.....on a person to person basis.

  • i hope this robot cant smell marijuana...

  • i wonder if it sees illegals and says 'Go back home you bastards' lol

  • robo cop

  • darpa is my dream job!

  • @doinworksonnnnn hell is your home

  • Looks like future idea for halloween.

  • This video was made on 22.12.2012, NYC, US. God bless the Inner Cycle!

  • Obviously a system like this, to be effective, would have to be designed to be entirely autonomous. The only data input it should receive is strategical in nature. It would have to reply entirely on its programming to judge and navigate its environment. The control systems would have to be separate. Like the android Data on Startrek. not like a drone. Adequate systems would be in place to prevent external data from affecting its real-time or acquisition and analysis systems, obviously.

  • 2012....

  •  Robots of this capability are not merely theoretical any longer, and you would definitely want one with the added reliability of not being controlled than one that is controlled by corrupt and stupid egotistical and spiteful people. Machines do not care about all that petty bullshit that makes people corrupt, like money, sex, drugs, and power. They just do what they are programmed to do. Unlike human authorities who lie, cheat steal and are 95% incompetent, fed up and tired.

  • @KieSeyHow Yes, except that they will be programmed to do what people tell them to do. And people will be just as corrupt as ever in deciding what to tell them to do.

  • Yes it could be hacked into, but most cops are corrupt and most authorities are corrupt, they have already "been hacked into" and I do not "hide" online like the rest of you. There are a lot of things I am certain that you have no understanding of in regards to programming, protocols, and safety systems. I doubt many of you even have the capability to repair a light switch.

  • @KieSeyHow I am a programmer with experience in Artificial Intelligence. When it comes to corruption by agents that will fear for their own lives, and indirect corruption carried out by agents that don't have to fear for their own lives, I don't know if the choice is so easy. With robots you minimize the potential number of corrupt entities involved, but at the cost of increasing the efficacy of that corruption.

  • Y'know what this ad needs?

    Follow the link: youtube.com/watch?v=oOjXyarN3-­Y

    After you get there, don't rage. It WOULD work because fans would be intrigued.

  • I'm in that clueless and paranoid bit of youtube again

  • Harpa darpa.

  • I used to be a robot from the future, but then I took an arrow in the knee.

  • Why does zach Galifianakis smoking a joint have anything to do with robotic cops

  • Well, the biggest problem, which I think people fail to consider, is the power supply problem. We have no way of storing enough electrical power to make a robot of these proportions which can run and perform power-critical actions for an extended time period. A lone operator, such as a soldier, needs to be able to run for many hours at high power consumption. (Not like asimo, which is small, slow, and not very strong, for example.)

  • @antiHUMANDesigns 20 years ago a cell phone battery was the size of a brick and all they could do is make phone calls, now they are smaller than a pack of smokes and are a micro-computer. In 10 years a robot like this will be more than possible, it will be probable.

  • @ShadeToSun 100 years ago, electric cars had the same driving distance as they have today.

    The cell phones 20 years ago probably used more power than the phones of today. Also, the cost of producing different types of batteries change over time. But the fact remains that our ability to store electricity hasn't improved much over the last 100 years. And these kinds of robots need to use a lot of energy over a long period.

    Of course I cannot say where technology will lead, but neither can you.

  • @antiHUMANDesigns Actually I can say. You are very wrong in your belief that batteries have not improved. Technology improves geometrically, not linearly. As a matter of fact, at a point around 2045 technology will literally progress faster than time moves forward reaching infinity given we continue on our present path. It's called 'the singularity', you may want to look into it.

  • @ShadeToSun I'm well aware of the singularity. But you're just talking jibberish. All you just said was a bunch of rhetorical nonsense without any substance whatsoever.

  • @antiHUMANDesigns Not jibberish, you just don't understand it. But I get that a lot from stupid people who pull facts out of their asses the way you do.

  • @ShadeToSun You're ine butthurt guy. 8|

  • @antiHUMANDesigns Don't worry, it's cool, Just take some night school classes and complete your GED. Things will eventually get better for you.

  • @antiHUMANDesigns watch?v=u8yoSAiwY18

  • @antiHUMANDesigns You may also want to check your facts, 100 years ago an electric car would be lucky to get a 80km range, today they can have a range of 350 km. wiki/History_of_the_electric_v­ehicle Would be a good idea to check facts first before simply pulling them out of your ass.

  • Excellent. Since it is not alive, it would be no more than vandalism to "kill" one. It has no pathetic emotions so it does not care about bribes or corruption. It will not hesitate to eliminate threats, whether they are delinquent children or old ladies. It follows orders and does not need a paychecque or "rights" or an 8 hour shift. It would not suffer from PTSD, or fatigue, or emotional weakness.

  • @KieSeyHow And it could be hacked into, controlled by the government or fall into the wrong hands and cause your death. It's nice and all getting new fancy weapon technologies but I'd rather have robots used to replace the 'worker' class so the rest of the world can focus in developing our culture, science, education, medical care, and free time. I'm sure it would leave us far better off than we are now.

  • @KieSeyHow watch it. Just remember, you're a part of that 'pathetic' species so unless there's something you want to tell the rest of us, I suggest you swallow your fantasy and join the rest of the human race

  • I thought the title said Derpa for a second.

  • @Synthmilk incorrect. Darla is developing a humanoid robot called petman.

  • @tensacross petman is being developed by boston dynamics.

  • Neil Blomkamp

  • if they did make robots with big guns they need to have a remote or something to stop them. just for safety reasons(:

  • Pretty sure this was a short film by Neil Blomkamp, District 9 director...not a Darpa project.

  • @Dudemonium11 Actually DARPA is funding research into autonomous human form robots, but there is no DARPA run project to develop one at the moment. The closest is the Raytheon Exoskeleton.

  • power rangers

  • This is from the director of District 9. That's why it is filmed in South Africa. It is not a Darpa project. If you would like to see what the real Darpa machine looks like search Darpa Crusher. It is much scarier than a film makers demo reel.

  • @xrock4. Petman is coming close to this kind of system. This is not real, but it will be, sooner than you can imagine.

  • it's fake until criminals creates a real one.

  • this bot looks fake tho

  • there website domain is south africa?

  • made in japan lol

  • WOW these robots better not be like irobot first there good then they betrayd u

  • Looks like the cyborb/robot from Appleseed

  • Fuck! has no one watched the terminator

  • Taking out them niggers would be good.

    

  • Fucked.

    

  • why would it need guns? if it was somewhat bullet-proof, shouldn't it apprehend the subject through non-lethal methods. That would be a realistic police robot.

  • @TheLedZeppelinFan1 "why would it need guns?"

    Without guns there wouldn't be massive amounts of blood and gore. Without blood and gore, people worldwide tuned into these robot's video cameras would simply change the channel and go watch Dancing with the Stars... so they have to have guns, big huge guns, with monster bullets!... for the ratings.

  • @doceigen seems logical. Arm em' up

  • holy crap i want that make a game of him like "call of duty: Future war" it will be awesom

  • looks like Briarios. SAVE DUNIN!!!

  • nice vid, but something like that is actual future. so the only question is WHEN will AIs like that get to the hands of the wrong governments, and how can people kill them.

  • @megatronlv with those bombs that produce magnetic fields where all eletronic things stop working

  • @yksnimus yeah but imagine greedy f*cked totalitarian government controlling its people with tech like that, Im guessing that "Right to bear arms" isnt gonna be that governments favorite quote :D And humanity has a strange habit mess up every good innovation so we go back to: Right to bear arms when all fails.

  • very real and coming to a street corner near you

  • The movements of this thing, from the way it walks, runs, and holds a gun to shoot when it is being fired upon, is at a level of logic in which we are 25-50 years from! If the U.S. Department of Defense had this type of Robot technology, Japan would be going to the bathroom on itself, or least be concerned about is stance as the # 1 developer of Robotic Technology in the world. However one thing is for certain, there is probably some one in DARPA actually working on it though.

  • 15-20 years.....

  • it's fake. the only thing somewhat close to this is the SARCOS project, the human exoskeleton.

  • if they are really this advanced in robotics, we are in trouble.

  • I dont trust the police we already have and now this wtf

  • @cherrypie11061 robots arent going to abuse ppl for money, or self pleasure

  • This is a huge scandal!

  • Fuck Darth Vader up...before they can make an army of drones...

  • looks like some movie lol

  • is this real ???????????????????????

  • @0nly1God1 This reality is coming soon.

  • @Kennykpz1979 So, no, is what you mean

  • @Kennykpz1979 Not, human life is cheaper.

  • @0nly1God1 No. This is a short film by Neil Blomkamp. DARPA doesn't have this good of CG artists working for them. Though I'm sure DARPA would love robots like this.

  • @0nly1God1 No its not real :)

  • Comment removed

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more