darpa is just another money pit , they dont want to know about anything that they cant charge big bucks for , no matter how many lives it will save on the battle field , no matter how big an advantage it will give our military , no matter how much safer it would make certain types of troop insertion, if they cant charge the military a fortune for it then they dont want to even listen.
@JoshuaRAWRR sorry but america is not going to be around for too long. they are purposely ruining your country so lets see who the next victim is going to be...oh wait, we all are!
@JoshuaRAWRR same shit different fucking day! u r white so u r all collectively responsible for this kind of crap because u all collectively disregard the rest of the world.
Obviously a system like this, to be effective, would have to be designed to be entirely autonomous. The only data input it should receive is strategical in nature. It would have to reply entirely on its programming to judge and navigate its environment. The control systems would have to be separate. Like the android Data on Startrek. not like a drone. Adequate systems would be in place to prevent external data from affecting its real-time or acquisition and analysis systems, obviously.
Robots of this capability are not merely theoretical any longer, and you would definitely want one with the added reliability of not being controlled than one that is controlled by corrupt and stupid egotistical and spiteful people. Machines do not care about all that petty bullshit that makes people corrupt, like money, sex, drugs, and power. They just do what they are programmed to do. Unlike human authorities who lie, cheat steal and are 95% incompetent, fed up and tired.
@KieSeyHow Yes, except that they will be programmed to do what people tell them to do. And people will be just as corrupt as ever in deciding what to tell them to do.
Yes it could be hacked into, but most cops are corrupt and most authorities are corrupt, they have already "been hacked into" and I do not "hide" online like the rest of you. There are a lot of things I am certain that you have no understanding of in regards to programming, protocols, and safety systems. I doubt many of you even have the capability to repair a light switch.
@KieSeyHow I am a programmer with experience in Artificial Intelligence. When it comes to corruption by agents that will fear for their own lives, and indirect corruption carried out by agents that don't have to fear for their own lives, I don't know if the choice is so easy. With robots you minimize the potential number of corrupt entities involved, but at the cost of increasing the efficacy of that corruption.
Well, the biggest problem, which I think people fail to consider, is the power supply problem. We have no way of storing enough electrical power to make a robot of these proportions which can run and perform power-critical actions for an extended time period. A lone operator, such as a soldier, needs to be able to run for many hours at high power consumption. (Not like asimo, which is small, slow, and not very strong, for example.)
@antiHUMANDesigns 20 years ago a cell phone battery was the size of a brick and all they could do is make phone calls, now they are smaller than a pack of smokes and are a micro-computer. In 10 years a robot like this will be more than possible, it will be probable.
@ShadeToSun 100 years ago, electric cars had the same driving distance as they have today.
The cell phones 20 years ago probably used more power than the phones of today. Also, the cost of producing different types of batteries change over time. But the fact remains that our ability to store electricity hasn't improved much over the last 100 years. And these kinds of robots need to use a lot of energy over a long period.
Of course I cannot say where technology will lead, but neither can you.
@antiHUMANDesigns Actually I can say. You are very wrong in your belief that batteries have not improved. Technology improves geometrically, not linearly. As a matter of fact, at a point around 2045 technology will literally progress faster than time moves forward reaching infinity given we continue on our present path. It's called 'the singularity', you may want to look into it.
@ShadeToSun I'm well aware of the singularity. But you're just talking jibberish. All you just said was a bunch of rhetorical nonsense without any substance whatsoever.
@antiHUMANDesigns Not jibberish, you just don't understand it. But I get that a lot from stupid people who pull facts out of their asses the way you do.
@antiHUMANDesigns You may also want to check your facts, 100 years ago an electric car would be lucky to get a 80km range, today they can have a range of 350 km. wiki/History_of_the_electric_vehicle Would be a good idea to check facts first before simply pulling them out of your ass.
Excellent. Since it is not alive, it would be no more than vandalism to "kill" one. It has no pathetic emotions so it does not care about bribes or corruption. It will not hesitate to eliminate threats, whether they are delinquent children or old ladies. It follows orders and does not need a paychecque or "rights" or an 8 hour shift. It would not suffer from PTSD, or fatigue, or emotional weakness.
@KieSeyHow And it could be hacked into, controlled by the government or fall into the wrong hands and cause your death. It's nice and all getting new fancy weapon technologies but I'd rather have robots used to replace the 'worker' class so the rest of the world can focus in developing our culture, science, education, medical care, and free time. I'm sure it would leave us far better off than we are now.
@KieSeyHow watch it. Just remember, you're a part of that 'pathetic' species so unless there's something you want to tell the rest of us, I suggest you swallow your fantasy and join the rest of the human race
@Dudemonium11 Actually DARPA is funding research into autonomous human form robots, but there is no DARPA run project to develop one at the moment. The closest is the Raytheon Exoskeleton.
This is from the director of District 9. That's why it is filmed in South Africa. It is not a Darpa project. If you would like to see what the real Darpa machine looks like search Darpa Crusher. It is much scarier than a film makers demo reel.
why would it need guns? if it was somewhat bullet-proof, shouldn't it apprehend the subject through non-lethal methods. That would be a realistic police robot.
Without guns there wouldn't be massive amounts of blood and gore. Without blood and gore, people worldwide tuned into these robot's video cameras would simply change the channel and go watch Dancing with the Stars... so they have to have guns, big huge guns, with monster bullets!... for the ratings.
nice vid, but something like that is actual future. so the only question is WHEN will AIs like that get to the hands of the wrong governments, and how can people kill them.
@yksnimus yeah but imagine greedy f*cked totalitarian government controlling its people with tech like that, Im guessing that "Right to bear arms" isnt gonna be that governments favorite quote :D And humanity has a strange habit mess up every good innovation so we go back to: Right to bear arms when all fails.
The movements of this thing, from the way it walks, runs, and holds a gun to shoot when it is being fired upon, is at a level of logic in which we are 25-50 years from! If the U.S. Department of Defense had this type of Robot technology, Japan would be going to the bathroom on itself, or least be concerned about is stance as the # 1 developer of Robotic Technology in the world. However one thing is for certain, there is probably some one in DARPA actually working on it though.
@0nly1God1 No. This is a short film by Neil Blomkamp. DARPA doesn't have this good of CG artists working for them. Though I'm sure DARPA would love robots like this.
Looks like a District 9 documentary.
Syndicated4u 12 hours ago
darpa is just another money pit , they dont want to know about anything that they cant charge big bucks for , no matter how many lives it will save on the battle field , no matter how big an advantage it will give our military , no matter how much safer it would make certain types of troop insertion, if they cant charge the military a fortune for it then they dont want to even listen.
jaxynreign 2 days ago
mgs4 became real
crazymuffinist 5 days ago
And then it realises its had enough of getting shot and rebuilt and turns on the people who made it. GOOD JOB AMERICA.
JoshuaRAWRR 1 week ago
@JoshuaRAWRR sorry but america is not going to be around for too long. they are purposely ruining your country so lets see who the next victim is going to be...oh wait, we all are!
smukase 1 week ago
@smukase I'm not American.
JoshuaRAWRR 1 week ago
@JoshuaRAWRR same shit different fucking day! u r white so u r all collectively responsible for this kind of crap because u all collectively disregard the rest of the world.
smukase 1 week ago
@smukase Safe to say that you're a retard.
JoshuaRAWRR 1 week ago
@smukase Just us not by the color of our skin but by the content of our character.....on a person to person basis.
troydeancarpenter 5 days ago
i hope this robot cant smell marijuana...
tardsk8r 1 week ago
i wonder if it sees illegals and says 'Go back home you bastards' lol
spongebobistupid 1 month ago
robo cop
amandavanwhore123 1 month ago
darpa is my dream job!
doinworksonnnnn 1 month ago
@doinworksonnnnn hell is your home
DanFrederiksen 1 week ago
Looks like future idea for halloween.
CorporalDwaynHicks 1 month ago
This video was made on 22.12.2012, NYC, US. God bless the Inner Cycle!
lin545 1 month ago
Obviously a system like this, to be effective, would have to be designed to be entirely autonomous. The only data input it should receive is strategical in nature. It would have to reply entirely on its programming to judge and navigate its environment. The control systems would have to be separate. Like the android Data on Startrek. not like a drone. Adequate systems would be in place to prevent external data from affecting its real-time or acquisition and analysis systems, obviously.
KieSeyHow 1 month ago
2012....
FunnyVideoMaker01 1 month ago
Robots of this capability are not merely theoretical any longer, and you would definitely want one with the added reliability of not being controlled than one that is controlled by corrupt and stupid egotistical and spiteful people. Machines do not care about all that petty bullshit that makes people corrupt, like money, sex, drugs, and power. They just do what they are programmed to do. Unlike human authorities who lie, cheat steal and are 95% incompetent, fed up and tired.
KieSeyHow 1 month ago
@KieSeyHow Yes, except that they will be programmed to do what people tell them to do. And people will be just as corrupt as ever in deciding what to tell them to do.
rufsketch1 1 month ago
Yes it could be hacked into, but most cops are corrupt and most authorities are corrupt, they have already "been hacked into" and I do not "hide" online like the rest of you. There are a lot of things I am certain that you have no understanding of in regards to programming, protocols, and safety systems. I doubt many of you even have the capability to repair a light switch.
KieSeyHow 1 month ago
@KieSeyHow I am a programmer with experience in Artificial Intelligence. When it comes to corruption by agents that will fear for their own lives, and indirect corruption carried out by agents that don't have to fear for their own lives, I don't know if the choice is so easy. With robots you minimize the potential number of corrupt entities involved, but at the cost of increasing the efficacy of that corruption.
rufsketch1 1 month ago
Y'know what this ad needs?
Follow the link: youtube.com/watch?v=oOjXyarN3-Y
After you get there, don't rage. It WOULD work because fans would be intrigued.
Tahkaullus01 2 months ago
I'm in that clueless and paranoid bit of youtube again
MerryMac1000 2 months ago
Harpa darpa.
cyberkid111 2 months ago
I used to be a robot from the future, but then I took an arrow in the knee.
ShadeToSun 2 months ago
Why does zach Galifianakis smoking a joint have anything to do with robotic cops
digim10 2 months ago
Well, the biggest problem, which I think people fail to consider, is the power supply problem. We have no way of storing enough electrical power to make a robot of these proportions which can run and perform power-critical actions for an extended time period. A lone operator, such as a soldier, needs to be able to run for many hours at high power consumption. (Not like asimo, which is small, slow, and not very strong, for example.)
antiHUMANDesigns 2 months ago
@antiHUMANDesigns 20 years ago a cell phone battery was the size of a brick and all they could do is make phone calls, now they are smaller than a pack of smokes and are a micro-computer. In 10 years a robot like this will be more than possible, it will be probable.
ShadeToSun 2 months ago
@ShadeToSun 100 years ago, electric cars had the same driving distance as they have today.
The cell phones 20 years ago probably used more power than the phones of today. Also, the cost of producing different types of batteries change over time. But the fact remains that our ability to store electricity hasn't improved much over the last 100 years. And these kinds of robots need to use a lot of energy over a long period.
Of course I cannot say where technology will lead, but neither can you.
antiHUMANDesigns 2 months ago
@antiHUMANDesigns Actually I can say. You are very wrong in your belief that batteries have not improved. Technology improves geometrically, not linearly. As a matter of fact, at a point around 2045 technology will literally progress faster than time moves forward reaching infinity given we continue on our present path. It's called 'the singularity', you may want to look into it.
ShadeToSun 2 months ago
@ShadeToSun I'm well aware of the singularity. But you're just talking jibberish. All you just said was a bunch of rhetorical nonsense without any substance whatsoever.
antiHUMANDesigns 2 months ago
@antiHUMANDesigns Not jibberish, you just don't understand it. But I get that a lot from stupid people who pull facts out of their asses the way you do.
ShadeToSun 2 months ago
@ShadeToSun You're ine butthurt guy. 8|
antiHUMANDesigns 2 months ago
@antiHUMANDesigns Don't worry, it's cool, Just take some night school classes and complete your GED. Things will eventually get better for you.
ShadeToSun 2 months ago
@antiHUMANDesigns watch?v=u8yoSAiwY18
ShadeToSun 2 months ago
@antiHUMANDesigns You may also want to check your facts, 100 years ago an electric car would be lucky to get a 80km range, today they can have a range of 350 km. wiki/History_of_the_electric_vehicle Would be a good idea to check facts first before simply pulling them out of your ass.
ShadeToSun 2 months ago
Excellent. Since it is not alive, it would be no more than vandalism to "kill" one. It has no pathetic emotions so it does not care about bribes or corruption. It will not hesitate to eliminate threats, whether they are delinquent children or old ladies. It follows orders and does not need a paychecque or "rights" or an 8 hour shift. It would not suffer from PTSD, or fatigue, or emotional weakness.
KieSeyHow 2 months ago
@KieSeyHow And it could be hacked into, controlled by the government or fall into the wrong hands and cause your death. It's nice and all getting new fancy weapon technologies but I'd rather have robots used to replace the 'worker' class so the rest of the world can focus in developing our culture, science, education, medical care, and free time. I'm sure it would leave us far better off than we are now.
Razgrits 2 months ago
@KieSeyHow watch it. Just remember, you're a part of that 'pathetic' species so unless there's something you want to tell the rest of us, I suggest you swallow your fantasy and join the rest of the human race
Tahkaullus01 2 months ago
I thought the title said Derpa for a second.
DakireProductions 2 months ago
@Synthmilk incorrect. Darla is developing a humanoid robot called petman.
tensacross 2 months ago
@tensacross petman is being developed by boston dynamics.
nyumetsu 2 months ago
Neil Blomkamp
aserta 2 months ago
if they did make robots with big guns they need to have a remote or something to stop them. just for safety reasons(:
oreo2010rip 2 months ago
Pretty sure this was a short film by Neil Blomkamp, District 9 director...not a Darpa project.
Dudemonium11 2 months ago 15
@Dudemonium11 Actually DARPA is funding research into autonomous human form robots, but there is no DARPA run project to develop one at the moment. The closest is the Raytheon Exoskeleton.
Synthmilk 2 months ago
power rangers
MrKillerapple 2 months ago
This is from the director of District 9. That's why it is filmed in South Africa. It is not a Darpa project. If you would like to see what the real Darpa machine looks like search Darpa Crusher. It is much scarier than a film makers demo reel.
xrock4 3 months ago
@xrock4. Petman is coming close to this kind of system. This is not real, but it will be, sooner than you can imagine.
powerone1 3 months ago
it's fake until criminals creates a real one.
royendgel 4 months ago
this bot looks fake tho
robinhoodsun 4 months ago
there website domain is south africa?
robinhoodsun 4 months ago
made in japan lol
MsHoustonbby 5 months ago
WOW these robots better not be like irobot first there good then they betrayd u
123AKA1 5 months ago
Looks like the cyborb/robot from Appleseed
Xneuz 5 months ago
Fuck! has no one watched the terminator
djlocman3 5 months ago
Taking out them niggers would be good.
ChicaWolverina 6 months ago
Fucked.
EliBOMSDlO 6 months ago
why would it need guns? if it was somewhat bullet-proof, shouldn't it apprehend the subject through non-lethal methods. That would be a realistic police robot.
TheLedZeppelinFan1 7 months ago
@TheLedZeppelinFan1 "why would it need guns?"
Without guns there wouldn't be massive amounts of blood and gore. Without blood and gore, people worldwide tuned into these robot's video cameras would simply change the channel and go watch Dancing with the Stars... so they have to have guns, big huge guns, with monster bullets!... for the ratings.
doceigen 4 months ago
@doceigen seems logical. Arm em' up
TheLedZeppelinFan1 4 months ago
holy crap i want that make a game of him like "call of duty: Future war" it will be awesom
DarkOniro 8 months ago
looks like Briarios. SAVE DUNIN!!!
1982patriot 9 months ago
nice vid, but something like that is actual future. so the only question is WHEN will AIs like that get to the hands of the wrong governments, and how can people kill them.
megatronlv 9 months ago
@megatronlv with those bombs that produce magnetic fields where all eletronic things stop working
yksnimus 9 months ago
@yksnimus yeah but imagine greedy f*cked totalitarian government controlling its people with tech like that, Im guessing that "Right to bear arms" isnt gonna be that governments favorite quote :D And humanity has a strange habit mess up every good innovation so we go back to: Right to bear arms when all fails.
megatronlv 9 months ago
very real and coming to a street corner near you
13CIRCLE 11 months ago
The movements of this thing, from the way it walks, runs, and holds a gun to shoot when it is being fired upon, is at a level of logic in which we are 25-50 years from! If the U.S. Department of Defense had this type of Robot technology, Japan would be going to the bathroom on itself, or least be concerned about is stance as the # 1 developer of Robotic Technology in the world. However one thing is for certain, there is probably some one in DARPA actually working on it though.
tfparn 1 year ago
15-20 years.....
VUPdingCLICK 1 year ago
it's fake. the only thing somewhat close to this is the SARCOS project, the human exoskeleton.
celjerocks 1 year ago
if they are really this advanced in robotics, we are in trouble.
ronaldoelpaso 1 year ago
I dont trust the police we already have and now this wtf
cherrypie11061 1 year ago
@cherrypie11061 robots arent going to abuse ppl for money, or self pleasure
yksnimus 9 months ago
This is a huge scandal!
87solarsky 1 year ago
Fuck Darth Vader up...before they can make an army of drones...
azis1100 1 year ago
looks like some movie lol
regul8n 1 year ago
is this real ???????????????????????
0nly1God1 1 year ago
@0nly1God1 This reality is coming soon.
Kennykpz1979 1 year ago 5
@Kennykpz1979 So, no, is what you mean
TheJennyFTB 2 months ago
@Kennykpz1979 Not, human life is cheaper.
maezmara 1 week ago
@0nly1God1 No. This is a short film by Neil Blomkamp. DARPA doesn't have this good of CG artists working for them. Though I'm sure DARPA would love robots like this.
brak512 2 months ago
@0nly1God1 No its not real :)
wunjothurisaz 2 months ago
Comment removed
bluehoarse 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@0nly1God1 Not, human life is cheaper.
maezmara 1 week ago