Added: 3 years ago
From: NHITV
Views: 32,561
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (100)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • what the fuck is this shit

  • Oh god, watchign this again. THIS IS SO DAMN BAD

  • OMG that chick got so mad! She needa take a chill pill before she get up there and start yelling because people were laughing at her!

  • He is completely right when he says that you don't need evidence to support values. LD Debate is completely different from the others(PF, Parliament, etc) You don't need statistical evidence, data revealing evidence, or any other type. You need logic to battle the argument. Here's why--Data, statistics always change... the census in America is let's say 1,000,000,000 people.. only for this year.. next year, it may be 2,000,000 people..You see, it always changes, that's why it's good to use logic

  • @TexasChainDog Straight up wrong, sorry. At least in CA, any state level debate requires statistics and hard evidence. On the last topic, which was about PMFs, having a case without hard stats and numbers was unheard of. Why does my opinion matter? I quartered, and saw the semis and finals. You're wrong, sorry.

  • @chairmobile

    well, i'm not saying its wrong to not have stats/data. Im simply saying that you don't need to ultimately look towards that in order to prove your point. And besides, wouldn't you prove it with logic. Say something that makes sense, not just numbers or tables, or graphs. You are right, im just saying that you don't have to ultimately look to that. Oh, and im in NJ. hehe

  • @TexasChainDog Well, logic is necessary in every debate; we see x in the figures, and hence y is true. Policy isn't just pure evidence lol, especially not fast.

  • @chairmobile

    that i have to agree with lol

  • @TexasChainDog Looking at your original comment, you stated you don't need evidence to support VALUES. This is completely true; I misinterpreted it and tried bashing you over the head with my comment. I apologize. Just one thing I have to disagree with - this isn't LD!

  • This debate is so bad it's good.

  • This is so baaaad

  • But what's the metaethic?

  • @ChristianTarsney Are you the real C Tarsney? Holy shit!

  • @chairmobile Are there fake ones?

  • @ChristianTarsney I guess not lol. I saw your sister debate at VBI. Holy shit, she was blisteringly fast.

  • God that girl is a witch! the one in white

  • latino.

  • Values? Ought? Moral? Is this LD, because this doesn't seem like CX?

  • @TheNinjaFilipino It's LDZ.

  • @Soeibbb I thought LD was 1v1? Is LDZ any different?

  • @ScreamingNugget Hmmmm, good question. Haha I'm not sure :P

  • this is the worst debate i have ever seen, why do all of them pause every three words hahahahahahaha this suckkkkkssssss Look up the NFL god i even think CFL is better than this NHITV hahaha god i want to join this league just to clean house lol

  • @TheBerkeleyBear i agree these people are badd lol i thought it was LD for a second b/c i debate LD but when this dudes argument was im a latino i just hit pause and stopped

  • the dude that keeps talking about profit maximizing and idek what kind of debate this is but its baddd

  • this was disgusting for the sport of debate. 1) Lack of warrants and any sort of argumentation 2) Both sides were non-responsive 3) Overuse of pathos 4) Horrible mannerisms 5) Splotches of stereotyping and nationalism.

  • "Yes or no" "Yes or no" "Yes or no" Shut up!!!!!

  • He is so nervous at the start.

  • I am new to ld and my first time is tommorow and i didnt expect to be debating for 22 days my coach misunderstood me and i forgot the topic changes on feb 1st i barely scrambled a af constructive and a neg constructive in three days I had a huge help from my coach so it is pretty well done but does anyone have any tips for me ? i am really nervous

  • This was...terrible. I wanted to try this league until I saw this.:p This could have been such a better CX.

  • these bitches need to try LD. hahahahahaha "hello judges, my name is ____" wtf??

  • the guy talking for the first 3 mins is so nervous thats why hes loud and mad sounding

  • Ugh.... the morality of the intent of an action does not determine the morality of said action. For example, Let's say you want to kill ALL criminals. The intent of your action is to rid the world of crime, but it's still not a moral action.

    Overall, that was a terrible debate.

  • I love the LOADS of irony implicit in the fact that he's defending the Latino community specifically based on the premise that selfishness is inherently immoral. I hope he's Asian, or this guy's a dumbass.

  • lower that mic kid

  • What is the resolution...? I can barely understand his speaking.

  • so when are you going to upload the new Great debate finals because my parents keep on asking me so reply back when you can

  • @JohnMarquezful We didn't send any crews to film GD finals this year. We may be streaming stuff from Celebracion so keep tuned. If you happen to know anyone with footage from the Sherman Finals, I'd be glad to try to post their footage. Thanks!

  • @NHITV But what about the Lubbock competition because there were microphones in front and behind us and they said that will be recorded

  • NHITV hey i was wondering when are u going to put the 2010 great debate for sherman, lubbock, and austin videos its because i really want to see them because i was cross-examination Champion finals so reply back if u get the chance thank you

  • Whoaa. Nothing Compared To What I Do In High School Lol. Dam That Was Gooood! I Wish I Was As Good As Themm. I Loved The Crosss Exx! Hehe

  • this is like going to war with nerf guns, these kids suck these are the rejects who couldn't handle real debate

  • Public forum is so different from policy o.O...I am so thankful I do policy :)

  • I haet how he pauses every two words. really annoying. :/

  • @Stalkerchick2 he talks like a rapper lol

  • They don't speak very clearly, do they.... What the hell are they talking about?

  • @OHWISEONE1996 Now, wait, it's just the first guy

  • Seemed like partnered LD baha

  • @SpaniardMonkey it is. its basically a shortened version of ld. its like public forum with ld structure

  • Morality is an idea you dont know when you have achieved morality

  • wtf he uses big ass words that i bet no one in that room including himself knows the meaning of, why am i watching this ?

  • lol this made me literally piss my pants !!!!! awesome comment its funny because its true!!!!!!

  • yeaaah this is ld isnt it?

  • NOOOOOOOOOO

  • Wait, altruism = morality? Let me go back and erase all 300+ of my high school debate rounds. I would love to have this guy in a round for just one cross-x and one rebuttal.

  • Am I watching a debate round or a really really really weird PF round? Or... wait.. wtf is this?...

  • @Shabbro its a"cx" round from the program the national hispanic institute. its really weird, its basically a program where u do debate but the structure is different. this is basically a partnered ld round. nothing like nfl or tfa

  • i thought during debates, affirmative and negative should never be looking at each other.. they should be looking at the judge.. o.O

  • true

  • if he values morality, wouldn't they lose, because everyone has different morals

  • @redraidersfan6 There is a really big argument that morality doesn't have to be subjective, it's like the general good (idk if relating that to act utilitarianism helps). Then if you say "someone finds this moral, someone finds this moral" that's the same for any virtue. I don't find just the killing of two cows to feed one man, but some may.

  • you're right literally had this not been a debate ......Becoz as u knw ethical or morality wld certainly differ from individuals , so I agree with you , if otherwise i wld be obviously a hypocrite had I given my own set of points regarding altruism or moral or ethical values and propogate those set of points and try to uphold it as a virtue....:):)

  • why can't i grab your video??

  • girl in black's a b*tch. Blonde guy way to go!

  • hey birthmarkslaya826 you sound absolutley retarted trying to call him retarted!

    lets not forget houston one in the past eight yearsss

  • the guy in the beginning sounds ABSOLUTELY retarded

  • haha tha

  • UIL is not the only tournament in Texas. Actually, it is one of the very few tournaments in Texas, because Texas has some of the best debaters in the nation, and they hold tournaments over there are all of the time.

  • dude the chick in blacks cx sucks

    haha he is a great leader tho

    "i am in high school"

    but he did not attack their case in the rebutle

    that can risk you the round

  • go Isabel!!!! :]

  • is oratory a bad event?

  • A message to the gentleman in the glasses: When it comes to a forensic competition, please don't act like yourself. Be professional.

    A message to the gentleman on the opposing to team: Please speak faster. And the 'values cannot be found on the internet' statement was just amazing.

    A message to the female on the opposing team in the white: You are just awesome. :)

    A meesgage to the female on the opposing team wearing black: Please try harder.

  • It isn't a policy. he's actually using a value judgment of the motion

  • I think it depends on what state your from, and how they debate. In the south i think in Texas??? they don't allow spreading while in Wisconsin, here they allow it.

  • ..that's not policy..

  • agreed...

    It's like pf in combination with ld.

  • Well who won? Team on left or right?

  • i think team on the left was winning..

  • Oh god, a criterion of morality. Thats original.

  • I agree totally.... i hate when people keep going yes or no sir....

  • Also, the whole "Yes or No, sir?" thing is really bitchy.

  • Great CX though.

  • dude ld is philosophy pf is real stuff like govrnmt n stuff its prlyy pf

  • haha, i've been doing real lincoln-douglas debate for 4 years and this is NOT ld debate. this is more like public forum than anything else.

  • maybe they're just talking really really slow...well he has a value and value criterion so i think it should be ld. pf doesnt have that

  • I facepalmed so hard when they called this a "debate"

  • i know! i was like what the hell is this

  • i facepalmed so hard when i read your comment.

    its called a "lincoln-douglas" debate. look it up

    they get a resolution for a month, research it, and come up with affirmative and negative arguments to it (e.g. the resolution for this month is "felons ought to have the right to vote")

  • haha, i've been doing real lincoln-douglas debate for 4 years and this is NOT ld debate. this is more like public forum than anything else.

  • 1. The topics last two months

    2. Just because the video says it's LD, doesn't mean it's LD.

    3. He acknowledges that he has a partner, making it a lot closer to PF.

    4. Even though he has a value/standard, they make no sense. Morality is not a standard, a standard is supposed to be measurable.

    5. I hope that it's not LD, because this is a disgrace to what LD is. LD is there to let us dig deep into the philosophy of the matter, to let us examine the topic from every possible angle.

  • because the video says LD, it SHOULD be LD. yea, yea idk about the partner thing

    morality can be measured, there's just no way of measuring it. strong morality is different from weak morality

    i guess they do suck

  • "morality can be measured, there's just no way of measuring it"

    Exactly. Standards ought to be measurable, not vague concepts. That's what a value is for.

    And I'm glad we agree.

  • haha woops didnt mean to say that. i meant u can't measure certain morals because others might have different ones. but the natural ones are still there.

    plus, pf doesnt have values

  • @HawjPawj this is a competition in a program, nothing to do with nfl tfa or uil. they structure their debate completely differently, and technically this is ld, but its just a partnered ld, more like pf and ld combined. but theyre freshman, so yea.

  • Man Paco is the best!!!!!

  • this year you werent allowed to say "yes or no" at the end of a CX question.

  • omg that was great..i loved it when he was like...uh..i dont have a job.. and everyone starts laughing

  • WOW!

    That was an amazing CX!

    I hope of of us makes it that far again this year!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more