The only Disney film i've only been able to sit through 10 minutes of before turning it off. And I've watched even the worst of their animated direct-to-video sequels. French Stewart annoys the fuck outta me. >:(
The only thing i didnt get was why didnt they do this FIRST? Its closer to the cartoon, therefor its my fav of the sequels. Some scenes and characters werent needed and claw needed a better evil lair, but other than that it was cool
Disney sequels are so fucking lame and terrible. They will only keep young children or retards engaged but will come off as nothing less then a massive disappointment for fans of the original.
whoever bought this movie must want their money back SO BAD dear disney if you ever wanna do a sequel for any of your really good movies try getting the ORIGINAL people
@thebuckrogers22 Meh, I didn't like this one compared to the first. The direct to video sequels never really live up to the expectations of the original movie. Same applies with almost all the tv series that act as a sequel. (example being the Emperor's New School and the Lilo and Stitch series)
IG2 was completely different; French Stewart replaced Matthew Broderick, Claw's face was invisible beneath his new hat, G2 was robot 247 rather than cyborg, Gadget kept leaving Penny out of the case, and Brenda was missing! But if I could speak for her, I think she'd rather die a woman than live for all eternity as a machine. As I assured in the Bambi 2 trailer, who is responsible for these attacks on the Disney sequels, and where will he or she strike next?
why did Disney bother doing a sequel to a hit movie without the original actors? (I think that The Lion King II & Beauty And The Beast: The Enchanted Christmas did good in having the original actors back, but had sub-standard stories).
@thatguysreviews I assume that's because they could improve the characters and make them seem more like the cartoon. And that's one of/the one reason(s) I'm guessing this is a better film than the first.
I would say it's sad when you can't even get Matthew Broderick back, but he was horrible int he first movie so this guy looks like an improvement. I can't get past that non-Claw though.
It's funny that people think this one is worse than the original. The original kind of raped the cartoon in terms of everything. Gadget wasn't nearly as bumbling, Penny didn't do much, and they revealed Dr. Claws fucking face in the first third of the movie.
The second one...is still pretty bad. But it's a shit ton better than the first. With the exception of G2, this one FELT like the cartoon and French Stewart was 100x better than Broderick.
@ZyxthePest nah, this 1 stayed faithful 2 the cartoon but it still SUCKED and it was STUPID. the 1st 1 is better even though it was a bit darker & more serious then the cartoon.
That's awesome and a classic! =] I do a tribute inspector beatbox too! it's on my channel if you want to check it out. I'm definitely giving this a thumbs up! =]
Although the sequel was more closer to the animated series in terms of characterization, the script was so bad it was painful to sit through. And the cgi gadgets looked more like something out of a Dr. Seuss movie, not an Inspector Gadget movie. French Stewart was downright annoying.
Against all the odds, I prefer the first film. It may lack a lot of the things the cartoon had, but at least it has a tolerable script and realistic looking gadgets.
I always thought that french stuart's portrayal was more similar to the gadget in the orginal cartoon. But even so i did enjoy mathew broderic as a more competant and succesful inspector gadget
Inspector Gadget is the American android police officer. In the television series Don Adams--formally of Get Smart--was the voice of Inspector Gadget. Anyway, it uses a higher truth, of technology using police departments empowering their detectives--or inspectors--and Inspector Gadget is all of that crime fighting technology in one actor: Why the technology is flaky, not everyone gets a helicopter and it has limited values. It had a good run at television and the movies.
2nd movie sucked because the new gadget was dumb as shit and they didn't show claws' face once in the movie, but hey it was 2003... not too many good films came out back then..
Not showing Dr. Claw's face is a direct reference to how it was never shown in the cartoon. Gadget being not as smart about the situation is also closer to how he was in the show. The firs one had a better plot, but I think the second was more faithful to the cartoon.
This reminds me of "Home Alone 4" where they act as the Character from the original movie, but never the same actors (or actress). :( This movie is SHIT!
This was a weird sequal. They should of made an Inspector Gadget 2 where Matthew Broderick and the original cast return. Maybe something like where Gadget and Brenda Bradford prepare to get married but than Sanford Scolex/Dr. Claw breaks out and tries to get revenge on Gadget and maybe Sikes for betraying him or something like that. Matthew Broderick was a better Inspector Gadget than French Stewart.
@jvfunn3000 That's the same thing they did in Home Alone 4 (and French Stewart act in that movie idk what character he plays as, but the movie was a piece of shit, I didn't watch it or anybody else) same characters name... but never the same actors (or actress).
The sequel made me want to throw up. It sucked so bad! No one could have played a better Inspector Gadget than Matthew Broderick. Disney should have known that...
I really enjoyed the first one as a kid. The second one was a huge turn off because French Stewart doesn't look nearly as comical and friendly as Matthew Broderick does. That, plus the absence of any of the original cast (even Penny is played by a different actress). Also, this one is ridiculously over-the-top silly compared to the first one.
Oh, and let's not forget: why the hell is the Gadgetmobile PURPLE? White was an awesome color.
As a fan of the original show, I have to disagree with people saying that Matthew Broderick was better, and that it sucks, etc etc. I felt that French Stewart did a better job of playing Gadget that Matthew, and that it was MORE true to the cartoon than the first one. The first one felt like Gadget Begins, without the stuff that made Batman Begins a Batman movie.
It's not that they WANTED to change the actor (BTW, totally agree with you on Matthew Broderick). But after he saw the script for this disaster, they couldn't get him to do it. Same thing with the mayor, the sheriff, Penny, the scientist, Claw, Claw's henchmen, and Brain.
@clarikid I liked Broderick's Gadget. He wasn't stupid, just naive.
Not to put down Don Adams classic portrayal, but the character was too stupid to believe. Broderick made Gadget more human, who still made mistakes, but could actually get things done without a lot of assistence from Penny.
French Stewart embodied everything that put me off the original character.
I can't argue that this movie wasn't more faithful to the cartoon, in which it was less realistic and more dynamic. I can argue that once compared with the original, it's dog shit.
the guy playing as inspector gadget is from 3rd rock from the sun
MrColej1234 1 week ago
did they HAVE to change actors?
weegee90000 4 weeks ago
I can't believe they had to bring in a famale gadget.. god damnit
fergo560 1 month ago
It says the ultimate fighting TOOL hehe.
hrcr101 1 month ago
The first live action movie was a million times better than this hideous abomination
joshbot360 1 month ago
I liked both, but I liked the first better.
I always found myself questioning about the fact, WHAT HAPPENED TO THE DOCTOR!?
HaloModder555 1 month ago
The only Disney film i've only been able to sit through 10 minutes of before turning it off. And I've watched even the worst of their animated direct-to-video sequels. French Stewart annoys the fuck outta me. >:(
Tozzywozzy01 1 month ago
I just realized he's the same guy from 3rd rock from the sun.
Unclesamslair 2 months ago
is that the pink ranger from Power Rangers Time Force?
57stewie 2 months ago
@57stewie nope, just looked her up on imdb. Not her
57stewie 2 months ago
de eerste film was leuk en goed redelijk grappig maar de tweede film is misschien leuker (ik ga die binnenkort kopen)
caban1992 3 months ago
Comment removed
TYRUNT92 3 months ago
French Stewart did phenomenal as Inspector Gadget. too bad the script was terrible
TheDckfilms 3 months ago
Jon Cryer wouldve make a good Inspector Gadget instead of French Stewart
JimmyLunchbox 3 months ago
@JimmyLunchbox That's not a bad idea! Jon Cryer should be Inspector Gadget.
billa107 3 months ago
@billa107 French Stewart reminds me of a wanna-be Jon Cryer anyway.
JimmyLunchbox 3 months ago
The only thing i didnt get was why didnt they do this FIRST? Its closer to the cartoon, therefor its my fav of the sequels. Some scenes and characters werent needed and claw needed a better evil lair, but other than that it was cool
ActionHeroeB6 3 months ago
Disney sequels are so fucking lame and terrible. They will only keep young children or retards engaged but will come off as nothing less then a massive disappointment for fans of the original.
Gibbs17Slayer 3 months ago
I love how you guys hate this one, even though its MUCH closer to the show than the first one
FireBoshy 3 months ago
whoever bought this movie must want their money back SO BAD dear disney if you ever wanna do a sequel for any of your really good movies try getting the ORIGINAL people
JOBROFAN1583 4 months ago
Inspector gadget is hot! at least in the first one
kvs072798 4 months ago
I liked this one better than the first but I didnt think we needed that gadget girl in it
GeeeRiff 4 months ago
The part 1 is cooler that this one..
MHusaini96 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i loved this movie
TheJPES11 4 months ago
isn't that the chick from the parent trap?
darealleelee 4 months ago
@darealleelee yup, it is
lifeliver777 4 months ago
I'm so glad I never saw the sequel as a kid. Disney, if you're going to make a sequel, bring back the original fucking cast you dumbasses.
Cheetah1251 5 months ago
screw the first movie. the first movie was nothing like the cartoon. this movie was more similar to the cartoon
thebuckrogers22 6 months ago 4
@thebuckrogers22 Meh, I didn't like this one compared to the first. The direct to video sequels never really live up to the expectations of the original movie. Same applies with almost all the tv series that act as a sequel. (example being the Emperor's New School and the Lilo and Stitch series)
coreykun667 3 days ago
IG2 was completely different; French Stewart replaced Matthew Broderick, Claw's face was invisible beneath his new hat, G2 was robot 247 rather than cyborg, Gadget kept leaving Penny out of the case, and Brenda was missing! But if I could speak for her, I think she'd rather die a woman than live for all eternity as a machine. As I assured in the Bambi 2 trailer, who is responsible for these attacks on the Disney sequels, and where will he or she strike next?
Jam24511 6 months ago
0:59-1:00 gadget sounds like woody from toy story
14jmen 6 months ago
Comment removed
14jmen 6 months ago
Go Go Gadget my BALLS
EasyExpertVillage 6 months ago
Where's Dick Solomon?
jkadoodle 6 months ago 5
@jkadoodle exactly what I was thinking
EasyExpertVillage 6 months ago
u should make Inspector Gadget 3
waternoy4578 6 months ago
Good thing my parents said no. Money well saved.
Dearhunter43 8 months ago 2
why did Disney bother doing a sequel to a hit movie without the original actors? (I think that The Lion King II & Beauty And The Beast: The Enchanted Christmas did good in having the original actors back, but had sub-standard stories).
BibleJoker2Face 8 months ago
Actually this looks better than the first one. At least it seems a bit closer to the show.
mybabysblack 8 months ago
Sorry IG2 blows! IG1 is better ( =
Do0m3sDayPr0ducti0ns 8 months ago
why do a sequel without the original actors?
BibleJoker2Face 8 months ago
@BibleJoker2Face why do transformers 3 without megan fox
TFSONICFAN100 8 months ago
@TFSONICFAN100, Why do The Mummy: Tomb Of The Dragon Emperor with a different actress playing Evy?
BibleJoker2Face 8 months ago
@BibleJoker2Face touche
TFSONICFAN100 7 months ago
actually this movie was more faithfull to the cartoon than the first
but that doesnt mean its not shit cause it is
raptorhunter104 8 months ago
They really should of made an animated GCI movie bot this live action crap made to look cartoony
Teletran35 8 months ago
@Teletran35 They tried that. It wasn't much to cheer about
PuppetMaster822 8 months ago
I actually prefer French over Broderick.
French is acting more "cartoonish" and thus, closer to the actual cartoon.
I have to admit that I really enjoyed IG2 back then, and I still think that it's way better than the first one.
When you're making a movie out of a comedic cartoon, you don't trying to make it look over realistic and you don't change the damn plot.
You don't show the face of a main villain that was always a mystery at first damn minutes.
Got what I mean?
TheJamesDM 9 months ago
@TheJamesDM i totally agree with u
thebuckrogers22 6 months ago
Sorry, Matthew Broderick! He's not in the film, let's go home and play "Buttons" with them!
HomeoftheGoodGuys 9 months ago
I hated this one, the audience is for kids under 10.
TheNoisePolluter 9 months ago
much closer to the cartoon...still doesnt mean its good. cartoons great im not bashing the cartoon the movies suck though ><
coolgal1506 9 months ago
omg y did they change actos thats so stupid i hate it when they do that im not seein this 1
PeanutPanhead 9 months ago
should have not changed the cast
n0offence 9 months ago
oh my god French Stewart... why would you agree to thiiiiiiiiiiiiis????
paperluigi64 9 months ago
i find it amazing that this movie released 2003 yet i havn't seen it just the first one
taltigolt 10 months ago
@taltigolt
It was a direct to DVD release I think. I was surprised I saw a DVD of an Inspector Gadget 2 with someone else cast as Inspector Gadget.
yauyuso 10 months ago
IT HAD A SEQUEL?
Shocksword500 10 months ago
i actually love lame gags so maybe i will appreciate this movie better.
DrDevilDD 11 months ago
is it me or does this seem more faithful to the cartoon then the crappy matthew broderick movie, NOOO!! I gotta get outta here!
lmckay023 1 year ago
i dont know i actually really liked this movie
treverpatey 1 year ago
@thatguysreviews I assume that's because they could improve the characters and make them seem more like the cartoon. And that's one of/the one reason(s) I'm guessing this is a better film than the first.
TomGyroid 1 year ago
they couldnt even get the original cast back? wow. terrible
thatguysreviews 1 year ago
Well... at least they got a blond girl to be penny, right?
MrMAHBOI1 1 year ago
Go go gadget SHIT
Nothingbutmagic1 1 year ago 30
@Nothingbutmagic1 lul thought you said "Sith"
ancheryay 1 month ago
I would say it's sad when you can't even get Matthew Broderick back, but he was horrible int he first movie so this guy looks like an improvement. I can't get past that non-Claw though.
CreepyMcCreep 1 year ago
Doesn't look great but at least looks like it's trying to stay faithful to the source material. Hell he even sounds a bit like Gadget.
boynamedjed 1 year ago
It's funny that people think this one is worse than the original. The original kind of raped the cartoon in terms of everything. Gadget wasn't nearly as bumbling, Penny didn't do much, and they revealed Dr. Claws fucking face in the first third of the movie.
The second one...is still pretty bad. But it's a shit ton better than the first. With the exception of G2, this one FELT like the cartoon and French Stewart was 100x better than Broderick.
ZyxthePest 1 year ago
@ZyxthePest nah, this 1 stayed faithful 2 the cartoon but it still SUCKED and it was STUPID. the 1st 1 is better even though it was a bit darker & more serious then the cartoon.
13LuciusArchangel 1 year ago
@ZyxthePest Nice try, French.
HyruleanHero1988 10 months ago
i don't think G2 is hot
FatPizza6912 1 year ago
is that matthew broderick
rootbeerdrinker100 1 year ago
@rootbeerdrinker100 No it's French Stewart.
Replicatte 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That's awesome and a classic! =] I do a tribute inspector beatbox too! it's on my channel if you want to check it out. I'm definitely giving this a thumbs up! =]
verbalase 1 year ago
first one is great...this one sucks balls....
victoriscool1 1 year ago
awful matthew brodwick was a way better live gadget
TheYorkielover95 1 year ago
No one will beat Don Adams.
neonzombieattacks 1 year ago 5
Although the sequel was more closer to the animated series in terms of characterization, the script was so bad it was painful to sit through. And the cgi gadgets looked more like something out of a Dr. Seuss movie, not an Inspector Gadget movie. French Stewart was downright annoying.
Against all the odds, I prefer the first film. It may lack a lot of the things the cartoon had, but at least it has a tolerable script and realistic looking gadgets.
WhiteJarrah 1 year ago
I want to punch claw from the second movie in the face!!
Blue01ization 1 year ago
LOL!!!!!!! it came out in my birthday
gekired74 1 year ago
I always thought that french stuart's portrayal was more similar to the gadget in the orginal cartoon. But even so i did enjoy mathew broderic as a more competant and succesful inspector gadget
Mechanicaldrugs98 1 year ago
is g2 a robot or did they do exactly what they did with inspector gadget?
adshield 1 year ago
@adshield i think G2 is an cyborg. and deffinatly not sicne she need batteries and oil at the end
ActionHeroeB6 1 year ago
Comment removed
ninjanoxrocks 1 year ago
is that pablo fransisco i hear?
roflhax 1 year ago
Inspector Gadget is the American android police officer. In the television series Don Adams--formally of Get Smart--was the voice of Inspector Gadget. Anyway, it uses a higher truth, of technology using police departments empowering their detectives--or inspectors--and Inspector Gadget is all of that crime fighting technology in one actor: Why the technology is flaky, not everyone gets a helicopter and it has limited values. It had a good run at television and the movies.
WOWJBEOWULF 1 year ago
They changed every actor, INCLUDING THE FRICKIN GADGET MOBILE. It certainly was cool, but it was definitely less serious and in depth
AnonymoussourceL0L 1 year ago
@AnonymoussourceL0L nonono, gadgetmobile is still D.L. Hugely. I wanna see them TRY 2 replace him
ActionHeroeB6 1 year ago
@AnonymoussourceL0L actually they kept the same guy for the gadgetmobile. look it up.
JasonVoorhees2011 1 year ago
french stewart is amazing actor, did you guys ever saw 3rd rock from the sun ?
xilion1509 1 year ago
@xilion1509 that was the best show!! i love french stewart :)
CryAndHealTheWorld 1 year ago
2nd movie sucked because the new gadget was dumb as shit and they didn't show claws' face once in the movie, but hey it was 2003... not too many good films came out back then..
codemaster265 1 year ago
@codemaster265
Not showing Dr. Claw's face is a direct reference to how it was never shown in the cartoon. Gadget being not as smart about the situation is also closer to how he was in the show. The firs one had a better plot, but I think the second was more faithful to the cartoon.
80sguy 10 months ago
i never saw the second one...but i miss matthew broderick...the only film i liked him in :D
Terrystearsatlfc 1 year ago
@Terrystearsatlfc that and Glory. not to mention he voiced Simba in the Lion King^^
garzilla3dx 1 year ago
this guy is always replacing people! i dont hate him but mathew brodrick was perfect this guys not bad
archounduser10 1 year ago
this may have been the worst sequel ever cause the actor was just to fucking stupid
caterpillars1tounge 1 year ago
Inspector Gadget (1999) - A Outstanding
Inspector Gadget 2 (2003) - A+ Award-Worthy
Hectorferjr2 1 year ago
I have the DVD.... IT SUCKS!
TheCartoonHighway 1 year ago 8
god... if the trailer looks bad... well you know
xNecroKey 1 year ago 3
This reminds me of "Home Alone 4" where they act as the Character from the original movie, but never the same actors (or actress). :( This movie is SHIT!
Replicatte 1 year ago
This movie looks so crappy. nuff said.
Fucksvensker 1 year ago
were is his g-friend from the first 2
obamachic95 1 year ago
This was a weird sequal. They should of made an Inspector Gadget 2 where Matthew Broderick and the original cast return. Maybe something like where Gadget and Brenda Bradford prepare to get married but than Sanford Scolex/Dr. Claw breaks out and tries to get revenge on Gadget and maybe Sikes for betraying him or something like that. Matthew Broderick was a better Inspector Gadget than French Stewart.
jvfunn3000 1 year ago 3
@jvfunn3000 That's the same thing they did in Home Alone 4 (and French Stewart act in that movie idk what character he plays as, but the movie was a piece of shit, I didn't watch it or anybody else) same characters name... but never the same actors (or actress).
Replicatte 1 year ago
who the fuck is french stewart?
DemonXY2J 1 year ago
The trailer was awesome enough to make you think ' Maybe this won't be so bad '. Then you watch the MOVIE...
ActionHeroeB6 1 year ago
i wanna know y they got rid of the other inspector i liked him better XP
LightPriestess16 1 year ago
this movie was horrible
mastercheif892 1 year ago
French Stewart perfect.
MorenoMelissa1 1 year ago
The sequel made me want to throw up. It sucked so bad! No one could have played a better Inspector Gadget than Matthew Broderick. Disney should have known that...
syd2much 1 year ago 4
i liked Matthew Broderick as IG
oana291 2 years ago 16
This movie just blew... HARD.
I really enjoyed the first one as a kid. The second one was a huge turn off because French Stewart doesn't look nearly as comical and friendly as Matthew Broderick does. That, plus the absence of any of the original cast (even Penny is played by a different actress). Also, this one is ridiculously over-the-top silly compared to the first one.
Oh, and let's not forget: why the hell is the Gadgetmobile PURPLE? White was an awesome color.
NESherv 2 years ago 4
MATTHEW BRODERICK PWNS THIS GUY
KayViMovies 2 years ago 8
That moron will never compare to Mathew Broderick thats a sappy movie
jimm06126 2 years ago 5
this one IS more like the tv show, but I like the first movie MUCH better.
something about Matthew Broderick and the way he played him made it a great movie.
hippocrit1234 2 years ago
As a fan of the original show, I have to disagree with people saying that Matthew Broderick was better, and that it sucks, etc etc. I felt that French Stewart did a better job of playing Gadget that Matthew, and that it was MORE true to the cartoon than the first one. The first one felt like Gadget Begins, without the stuff that made Batman Begins a Batman movie.
watchesMovies 2 years ago 3
Looks awful compared to the first one.. :x
takashy87 2 years ago 49
It is a lot closer to the TV series than the first one though.
dyld921 2 years ago
@takashy87 To me, this is Dumb and Dumberer only not.
clarikid 1 year ago
@takashy87 that pretty baaaaaaaad
GreatScott1011 1 year ago
@takashy87 Uhhh.. Both are awful.
GreenGearMood 9 months ago
@takashy87 The are both really really bad...
paperluigi64 9 months ago
@takashy87 I am not considering inspector gadget 2 as a sequel to the first one because the style is completly different.
legarstheman16 7 months ago
French Stewart (the guy who plays inspector gadget) was a better choice then some other dude.
jjc19461 2 years ago 3
buh buh buh buh buh inspecter gadget buh buh buh buh buh CHEESE!
phantompersian 2 years ago
Filmed in Brisbane. ^^
depor23 2 years ago
I guess it was cheaper to film outside of the United States.
SpongeStorm4000 2 years ago
as crappy as this movie was it was almost closer to the TV show to me than the first movie.
Brokenwingeddemon87 2 years ago
yea matthew broderick is better and this guy suck
sofikruse1 2 years ago 4
I don't understand why they had to change the main actor for this movie. Matthew brodrick was perfect.
clarikid 2 years ago 50
It's not that they WANTED to change the actor (BTW, totally agree with you on Matthew Broderick). But after he saw the script for this disaster, they couldn't get him to do it. Same thing with the mayor, the sheriff, Penny, the scientist, Claw, Claw's henchmen, and Brain.
ztslovebird 2 years ago 4
@clarikid I liked Broderick's Gadget. He wasn't stupid, just naive.
Not to put down Don Adams classic portrayal, but the character was too stupid to believe. Broderick made Gadget more human, who still made mistakes, but could actually get things done without a lot of assistence from Penny.
French Stewart embodied everything that put me off the original character.
ReverendSyn 1 year ago
@clarikid Steve Carell would have been a much better pick.
MrMaDelirious 1 year ago
@clarikid Broderick didn't wnat to do another film
TheStealthX 1 year ago
@clarikid No he wasn't. He was terrible.
retread01 1 year ago
@clarikid Matthew Broderick is a pleb, he seriously can't act for shit.
Spudfish93 10 months ago
@clarikid Are... are you kidding?
o_o Have you even watched the original cartoon? Jesus. I... I don't know what to be more confused at. Your comment, or the 41 thumbs up it got.
GreenGearMood 9 months ago
@clarikid
He didn't want to come back because he didn't like work on the first film.
CharlieTeague 9 months ago
@clarikid
One question...Why???
MarioFreek01 9 months ago
@clarikid Obviously he didn't want the role.
serbwithblade 8 months ago
noooo this actor!!!!!
peperoncina82 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The actor's ok. The movie just sucks.
ztslovebird 2 years ago
what they changed the actor that sucks man why do they do that. this one is gonna be horrible.
Anglebuddy18 2 years ago
The first one was better, it ruins the movie when they change out the actors.. -.-
First one was my favorite..
JediPadawans 2 years ago 4
i liked matthew a lil bit more
thechantelshow 2 years ago 3
chesey compered to the first
LDtheBrachio 2 years ago 5
I can't argue that this movie wasn't more faithful to the cartoon, in which it was less realistic and more dynamic. I can argue that once compared with the original, it's dog shit.
RevolutionChick 2 years ago
It's quiet....Too quiet!
Throatmad2090 2 years ago 6
Evil's afoot!
easyplex 2 years ago 6
Go Gadget Go! Again.
Throatmad2090 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
THIS SHIT IS SO FUCKING KORNY
toonyfatninjas 2 years ago