Added: 3 years ago
From: easyplex
Views: 189,422
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (157)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the guy playing as inspector gadget is from 3rd rock from the sun

  • did they HAVE to change actors?

  • I can't believe they had to bring in a famale gadget.. god damnit

  • It says the ultimate fighting TOOL hehe.

  • The first live action movie was a million times better than this hideous abomination

  • I liked both, but I liked the first better.

    I always found myself questioning about the fact, WHAT HAPPENED TO THE DOCTOR!?

  • The only Disney film i've only been able to sit through 10 minutes of before turning it off. And I've watched even the worst of their animated direct-to-video sequels. French Stewart annoys the fuck outta me. >:(

  • I just realized he's the same guy from 3rd rock from the sun.

  • is that the pink ranger from Power Rangers Time Force?

  • @57stewie nope, just looked her up on imdb. Not her

  • de eerste film was leuk en goed redelijk grappig maar de tweede film is misschien leuker (ik ga die binnenkort kopen)

  • Comment removed

  • French Stewart did phenomenal as Inspector Gadget. too bad the script was terrible

  • Jon Cryer wouldve make a good Inspector Gadget instead of French Stewart

  • @JimmyLunchbox That's not a bad idea! Jon Cryer should be Inspector Gadget.

  • @billa107 French Stewart reminds me of a wanna-be Jon Cryer anyway.

  • The only thing i didnt get was why didnt they do this FIRST? Its closer to the cartoon, therefor its my fav of the sequels. Some scenes and characters werent needed and claw needed a better evil lair, but other than that it was cool

  • Disney sequels are so fucking lame and terrible. They will only keep young children or retards engaged but will come off as nothing less then a massive disappointment for fans of the original.

  • I love how you guys hate this one, even though its MUCH closer to the show than the first one

  • whoever bought this movie must want their money back SO BAD dear disney if you ever wanna do a sequel for any of your really good movies try getting the ORIGINAL people

  • Inspector gadget is hot! at least in the first one

  • I liked this one better than the first but I didnt think we needed that gadget girl in it

  • The part 1 is cooler that this one..

  • isn't that the chick from the parent trap?

  • @darealleelee yup, it is

  • I'm so glad I never saw the sequel as a kid. Disney, if you're going to make a sequel, bring back the original fucking cast you dumbasses.

  • screw the first movie. the first movie was nothing like the cartoon. this movie was more similar to the cartoon

  • @thebuckrogers22 Meh, I didn't like this one compared to the first. The direct to video sequels never really live up to the expectations of the original movie. Same applies with almost all the tv series that act as a sequel. (example being the Emperor's New School and the Lilo and Stitch series)

  • IG2 was completely different; French Stewart replaced Matthew Broderick, Claw's face was invisible beneath his new hat, G2 was robot 247 rather than cyborg, Gadget kept leaving Penny out of the case, and Brenda was missing! But if I could speak for her, I think she'd rather die a woman than live for all eternity as a machine. As I assured in the Bambi 2 trailer, who is responsible for these attacks on the Disney sequels, and where will he or she strike next?

  • 0:59-1:00 gadget sounds like woody from toy story

  • Comment removed

  • Go Go Gadget my BALLS

  • Where's Dick Solomon?

  • @jkadoodle exactly what I was thinking

  • u should make Inspector Gadget 3

  • Good thing my parents said no. Money well saved.

  • why did Disney bother doing a sequel to a hit movie without the original actors? (I think that The Lion King II & Beauty And The Beast: The Enchanted Christmas did good in having the original actors back, but had sub-standard stories).

  • Actually this looks better than the first one. At least it seems a bit closer to the show.

  • Sorry IG2 blows! IG1 is better ( =

  • why do a sequel without the original actors?

  • @BibleJoker2Face why do transformers 3 without megan fox

  • @TFSONICFAN100, Why do The Mummy: Tomb Of The Dragon Emperor with a different actress playing Evy?

  • @BibleJoker2Face touche

  • actually this movie was more faithfull to the cartoon than the first

    but that doesnt mean its not shit cause it is

  • They really should of made an animated GCI movie bot this live action crap made to look cartoony

  • @Teletran35 They tried that. It wasn't much to cheer about

  • I actually prefer French over Broderick.

    French is acting more "cartoonish" and thus, closer to the actual cartoon.

    I have to admit that I really enjoyed IG2 back then, and I still think that it's way better than the first one.

    When you're making a movie out of a comedic cartoon, you don't trying to make it look over realistic and you don't change the damn plot.

    You don't show the face of a main villain that was always a mystery at first damn minutes.

    Got what I mean?

  • @TheJamesDM i totally agree with u

  • Sorry, Matthew Broderick! He's not in the film, let's go home and play "Buttons" with them!

  • I hated this one, the audience is for kids under 10.

  • much closer to the cartoon...still doesnt mean its good. cartoons great im not bashing the cartoon the movies suck though ><

  • omg y did they change actos thats so stupid i hate it when they do that im not seein this 1

  • should have not changed the cast

  • oh my god French Stewart... why would you agree to thiiiiiiiiiiiiis????

  • i find it amazing that this movie released 2003 yet i havn't seen it just the first one

  • @taltigolt

    It was a direct to DVD release I think. I was surprised I saw a DVD of an Inspector Gadget 2 with someone else cast as Inspector Gadget.

  • IT HAD A SEQUEL?

  • i actually love lame gags so maybe i will appreciate this movie better.

  • is it me or does this seem more faithful to the cartoon then the crappy matthew broderick movie, NOOO!! I gotta get outta here!

  • i dont know i actually really liked this movie

  • @thatguysreviews I assume that's because they could improve the characters and make them seem more like the cartoon. And that's one of/the one reason(s) I'm guessing this is a better film than the first.

  • they couldnt even get the original cast back? wow. terrible

  • Well... at least they got a blond girl to be penny, right?

  • Go go gadget SHIT

  • @Nothingbutmagic1 lul thought you said "Sith"

  • I would say it's sad when you can't even get Matthew Broderick back, but he was horrible int he first movie so this guy looks like an improvement. I can't get past that non-Claw though.

  • Doesn't look great but at least looks like it's trying to stay faithful to the source material. Hell he even sounds a bit like Gadget.

  • It's funny that people think this one is worse than the original. The original kind of raped the cartoon in terms of everything. Gadget wasn't nearly as bumbling, Penny didn't do much, and they revealed Dr. Claws fucking face in the first third of the movie.

    The second one...is still pretty bad. But it's a shit ton better than the first. With the exception of G2, this one FELT like the cartoon and French Stewart was 100x better than Broderick.

  • @ZyxthePest nah, this 1 stayed faithful 2 the cartoon but it still SUCKED and it was STUPID. the 1st 1 is better even though it was a bit darker & more serious then the cartoon.

  • @ZyxthePest Nice try, French.

  • i don't think G2 is hot

  • is that matthew broderick

  • @rootbeerdrinker100 No it's French Stewart.

  • first one is great...this one sucks balls....

  • awful matthew brodwick was a way better live gadget

  • No one will beat Don Adams.

  • Although the sequel was more closer to the animated series in terms of characterization, the script was so bad it was painful to sit through. And the cgi gadgets looked more like something out of a Dr. Seuss movie, not an Inspector Gadget movie. French Stewart was downright annoying.

    Against all the odds, I prefer the first film. It may lack a lot of the things the cartoon had, but at least it has a tolerable script and realistic looking gadgets.

  • I want to punch claw from the second movie in the face!!

  • LOL!!!!!!! it came out in my birthday

  • I always thought that french stuart's portrayal was more similar to the gadget in the orginal cartoon. But even so i did enjoy mathew broderic as a more competant and succesful inspector gadget

  • is g2 a robot or did they do exactly what they did with inspector gadget?

  • @adshield i think G2 is an cyborg. and deffinatly not sicne she need batteries and oil at the end

  • Comment removed

  • is that pablo fransisco i hear?

  • Inspector Gadget is the American android police officer. In the television series Don Adams--formally of Get Smart--was the voice of Inspector Gadget. Anyway, it uses a higher truth, of technology using police departments empowering their detectives--or inspectors--and Inspector Gadget is all of that crime fighting technology in one actor: Why the technology is flaky, not everyone gets a helicopter and it has limited values. It had a good run at television and the movies.

  • They changed every actor, INCLUDING THE FRICKIN GADGET MOBILE. It certainly was cool, but it was definitely less serious and in depth

  • @AnonymoussourceL0L  nonono, gadgetmobile is still D.L. Hugely. I wanna see them TRY 2 replace him

  • @AnonymoussourceL0L actually they kept the same guy for the gadgetmobile. look it up.

  • french stewart is amazing actor, did you guys ever saw 3rd rock from the sun ?

  • @xilion1509 that was the best show!! i love french stewart :)

  • 2nd movie sucked because the new gadget was dumb as shit and they didn't show claws' face once in the movie, but hey it was 2003... not too many good films came out back then..

  • @codemaster265

    Not showing Dr. Claw's face is a direct reference to how it was never shown in the cartoon. Gadget being not as smart about the situation is also closer to how he was in the show. The firs one had a better plot, but I think the second was more faithful to the cartoon.

  • i never saw the second one...but i miss matthew broderick...the only film i liked him in :D

  • @Terrystearsatlfc that and Glory. not to mention he voiced Simba in the Lion King^^

  • this guy is always replacing people! i dont hate him but mathew brodrick was perfect this guys not bad

  • this may have been the worst sequel ever cause the actor was just to fucking stupid

  • Inspector Gadget (1999) - A Outstanding

    Inspector Gadget 2 (2003) - A+ Award-Worthy

  • I have the DVD.... IT SUCKS!

  • god... if the trailer looks bad... well you know

  • This reminds me of "Home Alone 4" where they act as the Character from the original movie, but never the same actors (or actress). :( This movie is SHIT!

  • This movie looks so crappy. nuff said.

  • were is his g-friend from the first 2

  • This was a weird sequal. They should of made an Inspector Gadget 2 where Matthew Broderick and the original cast return. Maybe something like where Gadget and Brenda Bradford prepare to get married but than Sanford Scolex/Dr. Claw breaks out and tries to get revenge on Gadget and maybe Sikes for betraying him or something like that. Matthew Broderick was a better Inspector Gadget than French Stewart.

  • @jvfunn3000 That's the same thing they did in Home Alone 4 (and French Stewart act in that movie idk what character he plays as, but the movie was a piece of shit, I didn't watch it or anybody else) same characters name... but never the same actors (or actress).

  • who the fuck is french stewart?

  • The trailer was awesome enough to make you think ' Maybe this won't be so bad '. Then you watch the MOVIE...

  • i wanna know y they got rid of the other inspector i liked him better XP

  • this movie was horrible

  • French Stewart perfect.

  • The sequel made me want to throw up. It sucked so bad! No one could have played a better Inspector Gadget than Matthew Broderick. Disney should have known that...

  • i liked Matthew Broderick as IG

  • This movie just blew... HARD.

    I really enjoyed the first one as a kid. The second one was a huge turn off because French Stewart doesn't look nearly as comical and friendly as Matthew Broderick does. That, plus the absence of any of the original cast (even Penny is played by a different actress). Also, this one is ridiculously over-the-top silly compared to the first one.

    Oh, and let's not forget: why the hell is the Gadgetmobile PURPLE? White was an awesome color.

  • MATTHEW BRODERICK PWNS THIS GUY

  • That moron will never compare to Mathew Broderick thats a sappy movie

  • this one IS more like the tv show, but I like the first movie MUCH better.

    something about Matthew Broderick and the way he played him made it a great movie.

  • As a fan of the original show, I have to disagree with people saying that Matthew Broderick was better, and that it sucks, etc etc. I felt that French Stewart did a better job of playing Gadget that Matthew, and that it was MORE true to the cartoon than the first one. The first one felt like Gadget Begins, without the stuff that made Batman Begins a Batman movie.

  • Looks awful compared to the first one.. :x

  • It is a lot closer to the TV series than the first one though.

  • @takashy87 To me, this is Dumb and Dumberer only not.

  • @takashy87 that pretty baaaaaaaad

  • @takashy87 Uhhh.. Both are awful.

  • @takashy87 The are both really really bad...

  • @takashy87 I am not considering inspector gadget 2 as a sequel to the first one because the style is completly different.

  • French Stewart (the guy who plays inspector gadget) was a better choice then some other dude.

  • buh buh buh buh buh inspecter gadget buh buh buh buh buh CHEESE!

  • Filmed in Brisbane. ^^

  • I guess it was cheaper to film outside of the United States.

  • as crappy as this movie was it was almost closer to the TV show to me than the first movie.

  • yea matthew broderick is better and this guy suck

  • I don't understand why they had to change the main actor for this movie. Matthew brodrick was perfect.

  • It's not that they WANTED to change the actor (BTW, totally agree with you on Matthew Broderick). But after he saw the script for this disaster, they couldn't get him to do it. Same thing with the mayor, the sheriff, Penny, the scientist, Claw, Claw's henchmen, and Brain.

  • @clarikid I liked Broderick's Gadget. He wasn't stupid, just naive.

    Not to put down Don Adams classic portrayal, but the character was too stupid to believe. Broderick made Gadget more human, who still made mistakes, but could actually get things done without a lot of assistence from Penny.

    French Stewart embodied everything that put me off the original character.

  • @clarikid Steve Carell would have been a much better pick.

  • @clarikid Broderick didn't wnat to do another film

  • @clarikid No he wasn't. He was terrible.

  • @clarikid Matthew Broderick is a pleb, he seriously can't act for shit.

  • @clarikid Are... are you kidding?

    o_o Have you even watched the original cartoon? Jesus. I... I don't know what to be more confused at. Your comment, or the 41 thumbs up it got.

  • @clarikid

    He didn't want to come back because he didn't like work on the first film.

  • @clarikid

    One question...Why???

  • @clarikid Obviously he didn't want the role.

  • noooo this actor!!!!!

  • what they changed the actor that sucks man why do they do that. this one is gonna be horrible.

  • The first one was better, it ruins the movie when they change out the actors.. -.-

    First one was my favorite..

  • i liked matthew a lil bit more

  • chesey compered to the first

  • I can't argue that this movie wasn't more faithful to the cartoon, in which it was less realistic and more dynamic. I can argue that once compared with the original, it's dog shit.

  • It's quiet....Too quiet!

  • Evil's afoot!

  • Go Gadget Go! Again.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more