you tube is a joke and I really don't know with what criteria they chose what to ban and what to keep...what I noticed until now is hypocrite political correctness, I see showing the truth videos banned and terrorist channels always there, no joke, I see pedophiles moving free and videos about human rights and animal rights removed..I see lot of nonsense
Youtube is losing money anyway. And ultimately, Youtube nor Gay Google will ever be bigger than God. Everyone who owns youtube will give an account before the Lord. So it doesn't matter how much they censor...they still can't stop God.
Youtube is a private company with no obligation to show videos they don't want to. That is true. However, youtube clearly has a political agenda. They deny this but their agenda is obvious to people whose views they oppose. I think it is youtube's deceitful nature that is the most frustrating. If they declared their political leanings then their biased actions might be more palatable. But they won't. Indeed we are all learning that deceit is common among the political company that youtube keeps
Isn't it You Tubes, You Tube? Since it is theirs and not yours, they can do what they want. You have an outlet for your videos, so your rights aren't violated. But, I agree with you in my heart. However You Tube is under no obligation to show anything they don't want to.
YouTube can set whatever standard they would like. What they don't have the right to do is apply their standard in a discriminatory manner. That is what we are raising our voice about and is what we think others who use YouTube (regardless of what videos they do) should be concerned about.
They have the right of ownership. Which means they have the right to do, what they want, discrimintary or not. As owners YT can select what they want to show. Neither of us like it, but that;s life. How far do they have to lower their standards to make evrybody happy?
It would be illegal for them to discriminate against protected classes (race, gender, etc) without cause. While that is not the case here, it is still discrimination and while it is probably legal, it should be condemned in the court of public opinion which is what we are doing and will do. We don't have a problem with YT standards, we have a problem with how they apply it inconsistently.
mfx2010 wrote: "This mass of multiplying cells in a woman's uterus is not a human"
------------------------------------------------------So were you a parasite? Hmmmm, a mouse perhaps? NOoooooo... You were a HUMAN, and without this stage of YOUR DEVELOPMENT, YoU don't exist. A 6 mos. can NOT live on its own. It depends on its environment, just like you do. Your environment changes where you can't survive, you die Or if someone comes into your environment and rips you to pieces, you die!
The plain & simple truth is Abortion is murder. I am not without sin, so I will not cast any stones. I know people who have had abortion(s) & I still care for them. I hate what they have done to their child & I pray for them both, but I do not cast judgment on them. Abortion stops a heartbeat, so it is murder. It is not "your" body; it is a babys body you that abortion destroy. May God whisper in your ear the truth.
If people can't see what is wrong with abortion then we have bigger problems than one can dream. If a person can say abortion affects noone but the person involved and there is nothing wrong with it we have crossed over to scary territory and need to run back to God. Abortion is murder...no matter how you look at it and PP is in the business of cold blooded murder. Research the founder of Planned Parenthood. It affects everyone...right down to Jack and Jill taxpayer.
I've never seen YouTube censor any liberal videos. They only censor videos that expose the truth-- that abortion is murder, that the Democrats and Republicans are controlled by the same interests, and that those interests are giving away our national sovereignty.
Too true. YouTube has in the past allowed videos that depict people desecrating the Holy Eucharist; they seem to have no problem with allowing people to submit videos that attack Christian beliefs or viewpoints. Yet, a video that exposes the lies of Planned-Parenthood and the abortion industry somehow "violates the terms of use".
Yet, I guess this should come as no surprise seeing as YouTube is based out of CA....
Hey Hellfireblogs, I actually prefer the term "pro-abortion" and "anti-abortion" when it comes to this issue because most people who claim they are pro-life support the pre-emptive war in Iraq in which our country has murdered hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. I consider myself pro-life because I am against any form of abortion, and do not support the illegal, unconstitutional wars that America has fought over the past 50 years.
Same here but my cutoff is the 40th day after conception but any censorship is WRONG especially when it is selective and they allow terrorists,racists and libelous conspiracy nuts to go unchecked.
Seriously have you seen the video? Terrorists and racists aren't showing graphic images of medical waste. YouTube removed the video because 1) it's their absolute right as the owners and operators of this site and 2) it violates their terms and conditions. Also, they would have removed any video similar in nature like a live birth or medical procedure. It's not appropriate on this website.
"they would have removed any video similar in nature like a live birth or medical procedure"
--The is not the case. You can find many other abortion, killing, and graphic medical procedures on YouTube. If you go to our link on our website and read the case, you can see all the examples of other comparable videos that are allowed. If YouTube wants to label the content as mature, that is fine, but don't censor it when they allow all sorts of other content that is exactly the same or very similar.
I checked your website, I don't see any links to similar videos. I've been on YouTube for awhile and I've seen a lot of videos but I've never seen anything remotely close to what your depicting with the simulated images of abortion. And another thing, Ms. Benderas only speaks LAF's convenient truth. She makes no mention of the graphic images contained in the first video she only speaks of the conversation and she doesn't mention that the PP nurse in the second vid would not assist the decoy...
...because it would be a violation of law.Also, HIPAA overrides State laws.She cannot disclose to the girl's parents or even law enforcement something said in confidence between a medicalprovider and a patient.The video misleadingly makes it seem like she was standing out in the open talking when in actuality they were probably private room.What isLAF's obsession w/denying rights?You want to deny a woman's right to choose what to do with her body and you want to deny YouTube's right to decency.
LAF wants to uphold the right to life of every human being.
If you want to say that abortion is the "right to women's body" you have to give evidence that the child of her womb is part of her body and not a different body w his own heart, heartbeat, blood type, organs, etc...
This mass of multiplying cells in a woman's uterus is not a human. The reason why doctors have developed the scale of viability is that we have a concrete understanding of when a being is living and can sustain life on its own. For example, at four weeks a developing being is not viable. Unless, you can provide evidence to the contrary. Actually, on more inquisitive note; why does the life (questionable) and death of a being you may never meet concern you so much?
"This mass of multiplying cells in a woman's uterus is not a human." Really? If I take a DNA sample is it going to tell me its a cat?
Since when did a persons ability to "sustain life on its own" become the standard. A 6 mo. old baby cannot live on its own - should we be allowed to kill it?
That's ridiculous, you don't need an entire human to get a DNA sample. You can extract DNA from blood, does that make it a human being? And yes, a six month can live on its own, it can draw it's own breath, it can blink if it's scared and it can live without being attached to someone. A mass of cells cannot do that. What haven't any of you been able to answer my question? " Why does the life (questionable) and death of a being you may never meet concern you so much? "
mfx2010 - Extracted blood is not the same thing as a developing human being. A fetus does not stay "a mass of cells" for very long. If you study embryonic development you will see that fetuses have all body parts and a heart beat at only a few weeks after conception. It is fully human, only very small.
Life of others should concern all human beings. If I didn't care about your life and someone was trying to kill you (and you couldn't speak), you would want me to care and stand up for your life.
at the time of every surgical abortion, babies have their own heartbeat, brain, spinal cord, blood type; much more than a mass of cells and thats the EARLIEST stage of abortion. Abortion has, since 73, been legal through all 9 mth there are lots of humans who arent "viable," such as people who depend on machines, etc to live.
Finally, the answer to your question of why the life of someone whom I will never meet matters to me is my responsibility to be humane and compassionate.
Glad to have your support. Thanks for taking the time to comment. Just know that if you hang around here enough we might just win you over to the pro-life view. :)
Similarly, you can't be "pro-choice" unless you support school vouchers, privatized social security, the right to bear arms, and a whole slew of other positions that most "pro-choice" people oppose.
You're right, we should get rid of all those choices and let the government dictate what we can do. No more plastic surgery, no more choosing the car color you want only the Right-wing Pro-lifers can decide what everyone else can do. Can you answer me one question: How does one woman's abortion affect you or your relationship with God?
Yes, it is a choice. They are the same, they are decisions that someone else makes that do not affect you. Does the fact that my car is red affect you anymore than (if I were a woman) if I decided to get an abortion? No, it does not. Maybe we should go back to the days when women were regarded as property so you wouldn't have to form opinions about others and your husband can make all of the decisions affecting your body.
Would the fact that I have slaves affect you? What about someone who sleeps with his daughter? Does that affect you? What about torturing dogs to death?
What about a woman who kills her baby? Does that affect you?
Let me see now...you and your pro-abortion cohorts drive yellow cars instead of the red one I have. Nope, doesn't affect me.
You and your pro-abortion cohorts have assisted in the slaughter of 45 million + human beings since 1973. Given the odds that among those were at least 10 Nobel Prize candidates, potentially, I'd say that, why YES. My life has been very much affected, thank you very much!
i will NOT FORCE my beliefs on anyone , if you are trying to do so , then you can get censored all the way to hell for all I care ....
mirotrash 10 months ago
I think abortion is wrong! I just wanted to say that....
witch26071 11 months ago
you guys can censor people that comment on your videos. so why wouldnt youtube? censor what you put on their site?
Pelonetillo 1 year ago
@Pelonetillo We do not censor comments unless they contain hate speech, bullying, or strong obscenities.
LiveActionFilms 1 year ago
well, im sure youtube has a list of criteria to determine what they will and will not censor too.
Pelonetillo 11 months ago
One of my anti-abortion videos was removed as well.
/watch?v=0XV-Z09OtiA
Vrijheidx 1 year ago
shes hot but damn is she annoying
patbrennan13502 1 year ago
you tube is a joke and I really don't know with what criteria they chose what to ban and what to keep...what I noticed until now is hypocrite political correctness, I see showing the truth videos banned and terrorist channels always there, no joke, I see pedophiles moving free and videos about human rights and animal rights removed..I see lot of nonsense
MrAlbertoMusica 1 year ago
YOUR FUTURE IS IN YOUR CHOICES
BE START CHOOSE ECUCATION FIRST
TEENS ARE NOT READY FOR MOTHERHOOD
PALOMITA694 1 year ago
Youtube is losing money anyway. And ultimately, Youtube nor Gay Google will ever be bigger than God. Everyone who owns youtube will give an account before the Lord. So it doesn't matter how much they censor...they still can't stop God.
mrjames84 1 year ago
You know who else Youtube discriminates against? Porn.
WaxPhilosopher 1 year ago
@DirtyPotterOfficial Just because someone is christian does not mean that they dont deserve respect.
witch26071 2 years ago 2
Abortion is king
SlayerTooth 2 years ago
Radical extremist can mean anything depending on who says it.
BenjaminWirtz 2 years ago
I put your video on myspace, i twittered it and put it on facebook.
pfjb123 2 years ago
Youtube is a private company with no obligation to show videos they don't want to. That is true. However, youtube clearly has a political agenda. They deny this but their agenda is obvious to people whose views they oppose. I think it is youtube's deceitful nature that is the most frustrating. If they declared their political leanings then their biased actions might be more palatable. But they won't. Indeed we are all learning that deceit is common among the political company that youtube keeps
yahazif 2 years ago
Great video. Fight back. Fav 5/5.
1001Phoenix 2 years ago 8
I uploaded your video and mirrored it.
I also emailed your video to everyone on my friends list.
I will make a video of my own to attach to your video.
God Bless You live action films!
lifeinheavenforeever 2 years ago
Isn't it You Tubes, You Tube? Since it is theirs and not yours, they can do what they want. You have an outlet for your videos, so your rights aren't violated. But, I agree with you in my heart. However You Tube is under no obligation to show anything they don't want to.
4tinman8 2 years ago
YouTube can set whatever standard they would like. What they don't have the right to do is apply their standard in a discriminatory manner. That is what we are raising our voice about and is what we think others who use YouTube (regardless of what videos they do) should be concerned about.
LiveActionFilms 2 years ago 3
They have the right of ownership. Which means they have the right to do, what they want, discrimintary or not. As owners YT can select what they want to show. Neither of us like it, but that;s life. How far do they have to lower their standards to make evrybody happy?
4tinman8 2 years ago
It would be illegal for them to discriminate against protected classes (race, gender, etc) without cause. While that is not the case here, it is still discrimination and while it is probably legal, it should be condemned in the court of public opinion which is what we are doing and will do. We don't have a problem with YT standards, we have a problem with how they apply it inconsistently.
LiveActionFilms 2 years ago 5
mfx2010 wrote: "This mass of multiplying cells in a woman's uterus is not a human"
------------------------------------------------------So were you a parasite? Hmmmm, a mouse perhaps? NOoooooo... You were a HUMAN, and without this stage of YOUR DEVELOPMENT, YoU don't exist. A 6 mos. can NOT live on its own. It depends on its environment, just like you do. Your environment changes where you can't survive, you die Or if someone comes into your environment and rips you to pieces, you die!
icimblind 2 years ago
The plain & simple truth is Abortion is murder. I am not without sin, so I will not cast any stones. I know people who have had abortion(s) & I still care for them. I hate what they have done to their child & I pray for them both, but I do not cast judgment on them. Abortion stops a heartbeat, so it is murder. It is not "your" body; it is a babys body you that abortion destroy. May God whisper in your ear the truth.
adawnjoson 2 years ago
If people can't see what is wrong with abortion then we have bigger problems than one can dream. If a person can say abortion affects noone but the person involved and there is nothing wrong with it we have crossed over to scary territory and need to run back to God. Abortion is murder...no matter how you look at it and PP is in the business of cold blooded murder. Research the founder of Planned Parenthood. It affects everyone...right down to Jack and Jill taxpayer.
tudierudielovesJesus 2 years ago
When you murder your baby, it is convenient to be able to say that all your victims are dead and no one else is affected.
apologeticjedi 2 years ago
God bless Live Action!
JERice7 2 years ago 7
Thanks!
LiveActionFilms 2 years ago
I've never seen YouTube censor any liberal videos. They only censor videos that expose the truth-- that abortion is murder, that the Democrats and Republicans are controlled by the same interests, and that those interests are giving away our national sovereignty.
ChristianLibertyNews 2 years ago 3
Re @ ChristianLibertyNews:
Too true. YouTube has in the past allowed videos that depict people desecrating the Holy Eucharist; they seem to have no problem with allowing people to submit videos that attack Christian beliefs or viewpoints. Yet, a video that exposes the lies of Planned-Parenthood and the abortion industry somehow "violates the terms of use".
Yet, I guess this should come as no surprise seeing as YouTube is based out of CA....
theup3985 2 years ago 3
you should include our YouTube user name within your petition.
Good work!! Keep it up!!
thiswaythat 2 years ago
One of the videos mentioned here I found on another site, downloaded it, then uploaded to my own account, I hope you don't mind.
Coyne1988 2 years ago
I'm actually pro-life past the first trimester. I'm the rare and much talked about moderate.
Hellfireblogs 2 years ago
Hey Hellfireblogs, I actually prefer the term "pro-abortion" and "anti-abortion" when it comes to this issue because most people who claim they are pro-life support the pre-emptive war in Iraq in which our country has murdered hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. I consider myself pro-life because I am against any form of abortion, and do not support the illegal, unconstitutional wars that America has fought over the past 50 years.
ChristianLibertyNews 2 years ago
Same here but my cutoff is the 40th day after conception but any censorship is WRONG especially when it is selective and they allow terrorists,racists and libelous conspiracy nuts to go unchecked.
sopmodm4 2 years ago
Seriously have you seen the video? Terrorists and racists aren't showing graphic images of medical waste. YouTube removed the video because 1) it's their absolute right as the owners and operators of this site and 2) it violates their terms and conditions. Also, they would have removed any video similar in nature like a live birth or medical procedure. It's not appropriate on this website.
mfx2010 2 years ago
"they would have removed any video similar in nature like a live birth or medical procedure"
--The is not the case. You can find many other abortion, killing, and graphic medical procedures on YouTube. If you go to our link on our website and read the case, you can see all the examples of other comparable videos that are allowed. If YouTube wants to label the content as mature, that is fine, but don't censor it when they allow all sorts of other content that is exactly the same or very similar.
LiveActionFilms 2 years ago
I checked your website, I don't see any links to similar videos. I've been on YouTube for awhile and I've seen a lot of videos but I've never seen anything remotely close to what your depicting with the simulated images of abortion. And another thing, Ms. Benderas only speaks LAF's convenient truth. She makes no mention of the graphic images contained in the first video she only speaks of the conversation and she doesn't mention that the PP nurse in the second vid would not assist the decoy...
mfx2010 2 years ago
...because it would be a violation of law.Also, HIPAA overrides State laws.She cannot disclose to the girl's parents or even law enforcement something said in confidence between a medicalprovider and a patient.The video misleadingly makes it seem like she was standing out in the open talking when in actuality they were probably private room.What isLAF's obsession w/denying rights?You want to deny a woman's right to choose what to do with her body and you want to deny YouTube's right to decency.
mfx2010 2 years ago
LAF wants to uphold the right to life of every human being.
If you want to say that abortion is the "right to women's body" you have to give evidence that the child of her womb is part of her body and not a different body w his own heart, heartbeat, blood type, organs, etc...
Do you have such evidence?
anabandana87 2 years ago
This mass of multiplying cells in a woman's uterus is not a human. The reason why doctors have developed the scale of viability is that we have a concrete understanding of when a being is living and can sustain life on its own. For example, at four weeks a developing being is not viable. Unless, you can provide evidence to the contrary. Actually, on more inquisitive note; why does the life (questionable) and death of a being you may never meet concern you so much?
mfx2010 2 years ago
"This mass of multiplying cells in a woman's uterus is not a human." Really? If I take a DNA sample is it going to tell me its a cat?
Since when did a persons ability to "sustain life on its own" become the standard. A 6 mo. old baby cannot live on its own - should we be allowed to kill it?
MENDOL1 2 years ago
That's ridiculous, you don't need an entire human to get a DNA sample. You can extract DNA from blood, does that make it a human being? And yes, a six month can live on its own, it can draw it's own breath, it can blink if it's scared and it can live without being attached to someone. A mass of cells cannot do that. What haven't any of you been able to answer my question? " Why does the life (questionable) and death of a being you may never meet concern you so much? "
mfx2010 2 years ago
mfx2010 - Extracted blood is not the same thing as a developing human being. A fetus does not stay "a mass of cells" for very long. If you study embryonic development you will see that fetuses have all body parts and a heart beat at only a few weeks after conception. It is fully human, only very small.
Life of others should concern all human beings. If I didn't care about your life and someone was trying to kill you (and you couldn't speak), you would want me to care and stand up for your life.
princessintherain 2 years ago
at the time of every surgical abortion, babies have their own heartbeat, brain, spinal cord, blood type; much more than a mass of cells and thats the EARLIEST stage of abortion. Abortion has, since 73, been legal through all 9 mth there are lots of humans who arent "viable," such as people who depend on machines, etc to live.
Finally, the answer to your question of why the life of someone whom I will never meet matters to me is my responsibility to be humane and compassionate.
anabandana87 2 years ago
I'm pro-choice and I've been a big fan of your exposes of PP helping facilitate child rape. You have my full support.
Hellfireblogs 2 years ago
Glad to have your support. Thanks for taking the time to comment. Just know that if you hang around here enough we might just win you over to the pro-life view. :)
LiveActionFilms 2 years ago
Similarly, you can't be "pro-choice" unless you support school vouchers, privatized social security, the right to bear arms, and a whole slew of other positions that most "pro-choice" people oppose.
ChristianLibertyNews 2 years ago 2
You're right, we should get rid of all those choices and let the government dictate what we can do. No more plastic surgery, no more choosing the car color you want only the Right-wing Pro-lifers can decide what everyone else can do. Can you answer me one question: How does one woman's abortion affect you or your relationship with God?
mfx2010 2 years ago
Wah wah wah. Memes galore.
Killing a baby is the same as picking a car color. Riiiiiiiight.
hrhqueene 2 years ago
Yes, it is a choice. They are the same, they are decisions that someone else makes that do not affect you. Does the fact that my car is red affect you anymore than (if I were a woman) if I decided to get an abortion? No, it does not. Maybe we should go back to the days when women were regarded as property so you wouldn't have to form opinions about others and your husband can make all of the decisions affecting your body.
mfx2010 2 years ago
Would the fact that I have slaves affect you? What about someone who sleeps with his daughter? Does that affect you? What about torturing dogs to death?
What about a woman who kills her baby? Does that affect you?
JohnJ2427 2 years ago
No.
mfx2010 2 years ago
Thanks for your honesty.
JohnJ2427 2 years ago
Let me see now...you and your pro-abortion cohorts drive yellow cars instead of the red one I have. Nope, doesn't affect me.
You and your pro-abortion cohorts have assisted in the slaughter of 45 million + human beings since 1973. Given the odds that among those were at least 10 Nobel Prize candidates, potentially, I'd say that, why YES. My life has been very much affected, thank you very much!
hrhqueene 2 years ago
Your reasoning skills are obviously very weak. I'll go out on a limb here and guess you're a product of mass education.
hrhqueene 2 years ago
Ayn Rand is in Hell
CarryANationIII 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Does that somehow make you feel better, that a sadistic asshole god feels a need to torture people in fire forever?
waypasthadenough 2 years ago
Fascismtube, I tell you.
theheat151 2 years ago 4