Added: 3 years ago
From: bikini1212
Views: 62,509
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (274)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This all makes sense now.We're all akin to the dock rat who eats garbage.Glad we cleared that up.

  • George Lucas created the Aliens...I know...

  • If you like this, you've got to see this: YuQkegpKP_I

    Dr. Scott McQuate is the guy who put this together and it's pretty amazing.

  • They weren't trying to create a sentient being, they were taking an already highly advanced sentient race and manipulating their dna to create a race of worker slaves

  • It makes sense if you consider the Sumerian tablets. The annukai created humans by mixing their DNA with our ancient ape-like ancestors, of the first three created, two had brown hair and eyes but the third had blonde hair and blue eyes because he had the most annunkai DNA, that one was the builder of the ark, who the bible calls Noah.

  • @LSKEJ88 Yeps that was the best way to explore this planet ,and gather resources ,If you can not breathe on mars ,say ,but discover a creature there that lives well there ,You mix your dna with it ,Long process .,..But you dnt make it smarter than your species .You watch it from distance ,Never getting involved .

  • @elvception1979

    Not really. Blacks are the most "human" though. The tablets say that of the first three successes, two had brown hair and brown eyes, the third success had blonde hair and blue eyes because he had the most Annukai DNA, this was the human who created the ark, he was Noah.

  • Comment removed

  • No Doubt but the Black man is God.

  • Comment removed

  • @Buffboynick I know not all genological changes have an effect of the fenology of an organism. The change will only be noticible when the mutation survives in the genepool over a large periode of time. That's why it is called evolution and not revolution. It's a matter of chance if the mutation has an effect at all.

    I agree that modern darwinism is not correct in every known species. But in most cases, this theory is the most plausible one yet. I should know, i study bioscience ;)

  • If what the sumerians say is true, and the annunaki revolted, considering how advanced they were technologically, why didnt they just use robots?

  • I find this is fun. I mean, this could be real but it' sounds so crazy and ridiculous we just discard it.

    I don't know what to think. Although, I do believe there's life somewhere out there, universe is so vast, it would be very egoist from us to think we're the only race (capable of speak, read, and think) alive.

  • Like seriously god or aliens have any of you seen either of the two? My guess is no haha so until we see one of the two then your right but either way no one will ever no so let religion and higher beings go

  • nice deception frm whoeva this guy is!! only they are not aliens but the demonic spirits like the holy bible says!! definition of deception is something must seem right to hide the wrong.

  • I dont believe that aliens manipulated our dna. I think this is something the illuminati is trying to make humans, believe to crush the Church. They want us to believe the aliens are our gods and want us to accept the New World Order, In fact, I think a fake alien attack, using Blue Beam and perhaps some of our own back engineered space craft will be used, to frighten us into accept the New World Order. These types of videos are ALL LIES, by puppets of the New World Order!! God made Man!!!

  • humans are GMO!

  • GOOGLE EARTH WORLD MYSTERY sit back and enjoy

  • Yeah, lets go to a new planet and make the design for slaves when we get there instead of doing an optimized design before we leave our home planet.

  • if they were creating slaves, as he says, why arent we being used?

  • in the future talking rabbits and sophisticated hamsters will be saying this....

  • @jmrbker22 when I was a child we had Alice in Wonderland and How deep is the rabbits hole books to mess our minds with.. today kids already are born inside the matrix.

  • @SkodaRapid6 According to whom? By you even watching this video you are searching for truth, if you continue searching you will realize what you just stated isn't true. To think there is something so special about our existence on this extremely small planet out of billions and billions of planets and solar systems is a completely arrogant view of humanities existence. We are just another piece of the puzzle.

  • bla ..blaaaaaaaaaaaaa.. keep that for ur family and specially for ur wife tell her this fucken evolution thing

  • @childrenofelohim777

    yes id like to know aswell

    im rh neg

  • thats why the flood came, god said to chose the clean animals, i always wound why it said clean, why was some animals un clean, maybe there where having sex with the animals or worshiping or genetically changing the dna

  • When you observe the images of "The Annunaki"

    you will notice something rather "odd"

    They are wearing "watches"

    Watches didnt exist back then. Yet those images of them are THOUSANDS of years old.

    The upper dimension transcends time.

    They viewing our dimension is like you viewing a 2D image of a drawing on a piece of paper.

    Higher dimensional beings are that far BEYOND us and aliens. They are BEYOND all that exists in this dimension. Yet they are related to us through time and energy.

  • The Annunaki are actually us, thus sent by us.

    They are the alternate versions of ourselves (the more developed forms of consciousness and energy that exists inside us)

    This 3rd dimension is a "learning dimension" designed to aid us in soul development.

    The soul = conscious energy. Energy has been proven to function at a GREATER consciousness then us. Energy contains no atoms (atoms were designed to produce a 3D Reality)

    We needed "duality" (good an evil) in this dimension to grow.

  • @buffboynick If time isn't a dimension, ho does it have a direction?

  • The oldest known fossil is 3.5 BILLION years old and yet no one can seem to find the "shared ancestor" fossil (known as the CHLCA on Wikipedia)

    There are no "shared ancestors" for very different species.

    Mixing Genes from 2 separate species in a lab is what created truly different species. Thats why they cant find the "source of origin" for us Homo Sapiens.

    Its all about genetic engineering (done by NUMEROUS species for BILLIONS of years in this universe)

    Evolution = FAIRYTALE

  • @buffboynick You dont need to find a shared ancestor in fossil form to know if they are related. Genetic similarities can be used as a measure for the time where they diverged from eachother.

    Btw, the 3.5 billion year old shared fossil was soft bodied, sooo you would need exceptional circumstances for fossilisation.

  • @Powgow

    Actually the LACK of shared ancestors and DNA similarities found in many species PROVES my point is correct.

    The Bio-diversity here is the result of mixing genes from different species together (called Gene Hybridization)

    Some hybridization occurs naturally in the wild (among species that are similar enough to reproduce) but drastic hybridization can only be done in a lab.

    This explains the DNA analysis and the fossil record PERFECTLY

    Also explains surgical cattle/human mutilations

  • @buffboynick That does not prove anything. Fact: there is genetic similarity between all life on earth;

    Hypothesis one (mine and general evolutionist): Life formed here, hence genetic basis of all life.

    Hypothesis two (yours): transdimensional aliens did it (how do you call an alien, not from an other world, but from an other dimension? Btw, it hink you mean other universe, since a dimension = for instance space, and time (Our 4D universe).

  • @Powgow

    Your hypothesis (abiogenesis) have NEVER been proven

    In fact....

    Multiple lab tests done to produce it have FAILED and that is a FACT

    Panspermia on the other hand has TONS of evidence supporting it.

    Panspermia is also called "exogenesis"

    Multiverse theory is correct because our universe isnt eternal. It has a timeline (around 14 Billion years ago it came to be)

    That fact alone proved other dimensions exist.

  • that a full forest full of life will be able too fend for itself. Now is that not true genius? true creation? Our missing link will never be found because its not ment to be, not because it doesn't exist but because it would contain not only evidence of this manipulation but also proof of evoloution.

  • to see EVOLOUTION for yorsel. And i would never normaly bring a creator or creation into my descutions as a truth bearing characature because i dont belive in "god" persay, but if ever i was to give someone my reason for the belief in a creator it would be this. LIFE, being a part of something so beutifull and complex. And without any more thought to it, that life cares for itself, by evolveing and adapting anyway it can to form the universe we know today, like planting seeds already knowing

  • Ill bet these beings understand evoloution alot better than we do, and knowing that the questions we should be asking is this: what long term effects does thier interfering have on our EVOLOUTION, remember these beings are still studying us which implies that they are observing thier WORK IN PROGRESS. We are no more or no less than a species among billions and we all EVOLVE in everyway possible to survive, to live and pass on life to others and you only have to look at eveything in nature too

  • we are the exeption. FACT these beings found our planet, saw our species and messed about with us for thier own ends. if evoloution is bogus then when the planet was wiped clean when a meteor hit earth and wiped out the dinosaurs then how the hell did all the species that are alive today come too be?Did they appear from thin air?EVOLOUTION IS A FACT we are just too young and not clever enough to understand it yet, nature was douing a fine job with us all these beings did is what we do. interfere

  • We were evolving on this planet before these beings interfered with our evoloution, there is plenty of evidence for evoloution especialy of our species, if evoloution is bogus then how did these beings come to be sentient and capable of manipulating us? did other aliens do the same to them? and if so were did the first sentient life come from. Evoloution is not as simple as is banded about even darwin agreed with that verdict. The whole universe is about evoloution but somehow people think that

  • Look up RH-Neg blood lines.

  • How in hell is this under science and technology and not under the Science Fiction category.

  • so humans were enslaved for what? their "decendents" are who, the elites of the world, the secret societies?

  • The "slavery" theory doesn't add up. Unless, of course, they just wanted us to build their monuments and then left earth.

  • @gimmie1261 their decendents built the monuments

  • Comment removed

  • The ancient monuments are astronomically oriented.

  • @gimmie1261 Check out Robert Morningsky The Star Elders 1/14...part 11 is where it's really interesting, but try not to skip ahead. It's on youtube. Interesting topic.

  • @gimmie1261

    The Annunaki did not create humans in order to build monuments but rather to mine gold and other minerals for their needs on their planet, in particular gold for their atmosphere. Similar to colonialsm in which a empire like Britain set up camp in India to control the resources, so did the Annunaki did here on Earth. Once they set up camp and decided to stay here for a while, then they decided to built their own "Plantations" (as in monuments) to settle in and play house.

  • Agree with every word this guy saying. Why it was done in the first place is open to debate. Perhaps were intended as a slave race, a result of genetic curiosity or maybe a stab at creating a superior race...................Who knows?

  • the god of the bible is aliens who created us.. not magically but scientifically. we didn't have the scientific knowledge so we called them gods

  • evolution = another BULLSHIT religion of nonsense

    There is no such thing as evolution.

    The ONLY thing that does occur is small changes (mutations) due to reproduction, old age, and interactions with bacteria and viruses.

    We dont EVER "magically mutate" nor transform (morph) into a NEW species ever!!! Not even over the course of MILLIONS of years

    Its IMPOSSIBLE for RADICAL "species-transforming" mutations to ever occur. ONLY genetic engineering, modification, and alteration can do that__FACT

  • @buffboynick So your telling me that bacteria that are introduced to antibiotics, over an extended period of time, cannot become immune to it? That, by the way, is evolution.

  • @Brendan1246

    That is debatable.

    Some call that "microevolution" (which I think is a dumb term, since it just built up a tolerance)

    If someone smacked me in the face 3 times a day, everyday for a month....

    I'd get use to it, but it still would hurt a little

    Drastic "evolution" (macroevolution/speciation) has not only never been proven, but its ILLOGICAL.

    Thats why all the "shared ancestors" are missing in the fossil record. Especially ours, the CHLCA (chimpanzee-human last common ancestor)

  • @buffboynick speciation has occurred with many animals, for example, northern hemisphere gulls and the Galapagos tortoises. The "missing ancestors" have simply not been found, but are being looked for. To say they are not there and that ancient aliens made us millions of years ago IS illogical.

  • @Brendan1246

    FALSE

    True "speciation" would be when 1 species becomes a separate species (meaning that the genetic drift is so great that they can no longer reproduce with one another under any circumstances)

    This type of speciation is not only unseen in both the fossil record and current observation but also IMPOSSIBLE

    A new species is created by mixing the genes of 2 or more species together in a process called "gene hybridization" then X/Y chromosomes are added so genders can multiply

  • @Brendan1246

    An examples of gene hybridization that us humans have done in the past was the creation of "killer bees"

    Killer Bees are man-made and are an example of "genetic engineering"

    In the UK scientists are currently making animal-human hybrids__FACT. That video is even on here.

    The USA congress banned the making of animal-human hybrids a few years ago but its perfectly legal in the UK. If us dumb humans can genetically engineer NEW species, then aliens would have NO PROBLEM doing so.

  • @buffboynick You talk about facts but your still on this alien thing. Sure aliens COULD have done it but they COULD not have. If you say that they did you need prove and evidence, not your assumptions and opinions.

  • @Brendan1246

    Well I actually have both the "evidence for evolution" and the "evidence against evolution' both working to support this ancient engineering hypothesis and I will explain.....

    The DNA similarities that are shown in DNA sequencing mapping (that many Evolutionists say shows "shared ancestry") would mimic the DNA similarities of mixing 2 or more species DNA together in a process called gene hybridization.

    It also explains the LACK of shared ancestors. Its a FLAWLESS explanation.

  • @buffboynick The lack of shared ancestry being fixed by paleontologists searching for them. You still give no evidence for the aliens you say exist. You sit there knowing that even though most of the evidence points towards evolution and yet still go around that and say that aliens did it, with absolutely no prove what so ever.

  • @Brendan1246

    Need further explanation?

    Research "Rh Negative Blood type" and WHY it exists in ONLY us humans.

    Research surgical cattle mutilations and surgical human mutilations

    Research the new species of animals that were found in 2011 in isolated areas that show no SOURCE of origin (no traceable ancestry)

    Genetic engineering is surprisingly easy, it explains the INCREASING COMPLEXITY in all life forms (even Darwinists admit increasing complexity), and explains the DNA and fossil record

  • @Brendan1246

    Part 2 (continued)

    The reason we know this genetic engineering is being done by ET and NOT God is because of ex CIA testimony and declassified documents like "Yellowbook"

    Also....God doesnt make 3D holograms nor flawed physical 3D forms.

    This entire 3rd dimension (our universe) is a HOLOGRAM (a 3D illusion) created from the upper dimension.

    Atoms are generated from the upper dimension to create length, width, depth (3D reality)

    Only ENERGY is real and MULTI-dimensional.

  • @Brendan1246

    Part 3 (continued)

    If you research the subject of evolution extensively (I mean VERY, very extensively) you will notice the following things.....

    The Fossil record shows that there were some periods in time where NUMEROUS and radically-diverse species suddenly emerged (not gradually, very rapidly) and this fact goes unexplained by evolution.

    Also, the oldest known fossil is 3.5 BILLION years old and we have NUMEROUS dinosaur fossils 250 MILLION years old, yet no CHLCA fossils

  • @Brendan1246

    Part 4 (final conclusion)

    Dont you find it rather "odd" that one minute we have enormous LIZARDS roaming planet Earth (dinosaurs) and then millions of years later we have bipedal Homo Sapiens (which design computer chips, medical lasers, art, music, space travel, etc.....)?????

    Do you honestly think single-celled organisms evolve into GIANT lizards one point in time and then evolve into us at another point in time? ILLOGICAL

    This planet is a bio-sphere project. Plain and simple

  • @buffboynick Those lizards didn't just appear from no where, it took hundreds of millions of years to get to a point where they could no longer survive due to the inability to adapt. However the mammals that existed under them, were able to survive and flourish when they were gone. Millions of years after that eventually evolve into smaller hominids from even smaller mammals that lived in trees.

  • @Brendan1246

    unproven BS

    Single-celled organisms "magically" evolve into dinosaurs at one point in time and then in another time period they evolve into computer-using, medical laser designing, moon-landing, tv watching, art/music making, Homo Sapiens!!! hahahaha

    You Darwinists are an utter DISGRACE to science.

    In fact.....you're more RELIGIOUS then moronic creationists!!!

    Big Bang Theory, Multiverse Theory, and Ancient Astronaut Theory make sense. Evolution however FAILS on every level.

  • @buffboynick Your grasp of biology is really bad and your comments make no sense, so it would probably benefit you if you stopped making terrible comments as they lack any merit what so ever.

  • @Brendan1246

    You're clearly another member of the RELIGION of Darwinism.

    If you believe in magical UNPROVEN mutations and MYTHICAL ape-men "shared ancestors" then why are you watching a video like that DISPROVES your evolution MYTH?????

    Go watch a Dawkins video boy, and be gone

    If you ev-LIE-utionists want us to "believe" in your bullshit then find some shared ancestors, show proof of one species becoming another, or explain why us Homo Sapiens havent "speciated" in our 200,000 years here!!

  • @Brendan1246

    Scientists that disagree with evolution.....

    Dr David Berlinksi (an agnostic with degrees in molecular biology, philosophy, and mathematics)

    Dr. Thomas Barnes, Physicist

    Dr. John Baumgardner, Electrical Engineering, Space Physicist, Geophysicist, expert in supercomputer modeling of plate tectonics

    Dr. Kimberly Berrine, Microbiology & Immunology

    Prof. Vladimir Betina, Microbiology, Biochemistry & Biology

    Dr. Andrew Bosanquet, Biology, Microbiology

    You FAIL Darwinist

  • @buffboynick Are you fucking kidding me. Now give me the names of never heard of creationist that have degrees in science. Do you seriously think there is no bias at all for them not believing in evolution. You need to get your head out of your ass. (Dr. Berlinksi is a creationist btw not an agnostic, get your shit straight)

  • @Brendan1246

    BULLSHIT

    Goto Wikipedia and type in "Dr David Berlinski"

    He is an AGNOSTIC__FACT

    It clearly says so on there. He has also stated that NUMEROUS times. He also refuses to say "who or what" is doing the intelligent design.

    He has degrees in MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, mathematics, and philosophy___FACT

    You Darwinists are so full of bullshit lol. Go worship your MYTHICAL ape-man "shared ancestor" and MAGICAL mutation theory.

    Also type in "Piltdown Man" in on Wikipedia and read!!!!

  • @buffboynick Do you mind telling me your opinion of human existence or does looking at your channel explain that?

  • @buffboynick LOL you don´t even understand the definition and concept of evolution...

  • @buffboynick "The ONLY thing that does occur is small changes (mutations) due to reproduction, old age, and interactions with bacteria and viruses." this is evolution in a nut shell dude, im pretty sure nobody believed in the pokemon evolution theory lol... and that one sentence has more scientific evidence supporting it than the bible supposedly supporting itself.

  • @buffboynick u just explained the theory of evolution very well, but you left out one part, all religion is bullshit, not just evolution. And by the way evolution has more scientific evidence than any other religion

  • @OrogDeMalfur

    All religion is bullshit.

    If you view my channel.....

    You will see I am no fan of organized religion. They are PRISONS for the mind, body, and soul.

    The theory of evolution is slowly being REPLACED by the FAR better scientific theories of Panspermia and Ancient Astronaut Theory.

    And if you dont believe me.....I can send you the scientific journals and videos to prove that.

    The increasing complexity and bio-diversity is BEST explained by natural and lab-induced hybridization.

  • @buffboynick can you send me some of those journals, i believe you, just want to read some work on this stuff!!!! thanks

  • @freshtilldeath78

    I'm sending you some great stuff.....

    It will be in your inbox

  • @freshtilldeath78

    I tried to send you some stuff but Youtube wouldnt let me.

    Do you have your settings set to only allow friends to Personal Message you?

    If so, you'll have to adjust that so I can send you some links and videos.

  • @buffboynick not millions of years. It's BILLIONS of years. We as Humans aren't wired to fathom what A BILLION years actually is. Genetic mutations occur over vast periods of time. Key word "VAST". We're talking about time scales that allow for virtually anything. Furthermore, genetic mutations occur due to environmental factors, geographical location, and external stimuli. Proof of evolution is Cancer. Genes mutate, cell becomes something it could never have been. Evolution is real. very real.

  • @skyinmind487

    Nope. I'm afraid you've been brainwashed. Thats why evolution propaganda is perfect indoctrination from the government. Its even better propaganda then Creationism (also not true)

    Cancer is an example of a "negative" mutation. Mutations are 100% real. But mutations NEVER radically alter a species (not even over a BILLION years)

    Cats stay Cats, Dogs stay dogs, chimps stay chimps. In fact Chimpanzees have existed for at least 2 MILLION years and no NEW species have come from them

  • @buffboynick I actually have an extremely open mind and I agree that the macro evolutionary theory is flawed in a few ways. But you must ask yourself, how did life start on this planet? Was the first form of what we characterize as "life" a complex multi cellular entity? I don't think it was. Most people would agree it seems to have been a primitive form of cell. Mammalian life also didn't exist prior to 200 or 300 million years ago yet reptilian life did...so how did mammals come about?

  • @skyinmind487

    Like Dr. Francis Crick says (he was the co-discoverer of the DNA molecule and a Nobel Prize winner) our planet developed life due to a process called "Directed Panspermia" (Info about Crick and Panspermia is on Wikipedia)

    He says aliens "intentionally" seeded this planet with life.

    Then gradually (over BILLIONS of years) multiple species of extraterrestrials genetically altered that life creating bio-diversity.

    Linda Howe says they even made the dinosaurs in a video on here!!!

  • @buffboynick I am familiar with Dr. Crick along with his colleague Watson. Panspermia itself is life coming here from an asteroid. While the direct Panspermia you are referring to means ET intelligences planted life here. But how do you explain the origin of these ET's on their own planet? How did the first "life" in the universe start? I am a believer in ETs (It's quite absurd and ignorant not to believe in them) but there had to be some type of natural process that started it all....

  • @skyinmind487

    Like the title Headline on my page says...

    "The Annunaki were sent by us"

    The 1st aliens to exist in this dimension were "Inter-dimensional beings" from the upper dimension (often called the Annunaki)

    Goto Google, click on Images, and type in "Annunaki Bird" to see a carving of one on the ancient Sumerian walls. The Bird beings are HALF of the Annunaki (they mixed their DNA with primitive lizards/snakes to make Reptilians)

    Genetic engineering, no evolution. All comes from GE

  • @buffboynick so how did the 1st aliens get to be what they were? They suddenly appeared in their intelligent form? furthermore, where did those who dwell in the upper dimension some from? and so on and so forth...there HAD to be a simple beginning to life itself. otherwise you're claiming a creator...hopefully you're not

  • @buffboynick .... speciation does not happen overnight due to species-transforming mutations , they accumulate over time, until some event (be it geographical or colonisation) causes them to isolate and evolve into a new species. So, in my honest opinion, aliens did not do that.

    But, lets presume that aliens did genetically engineer us. Those aliens probably have DNA too, and they must have evolved also. Or have they been genetically engineered as well? Have the Gods been made by other Gods?

  • @Powgow

    The 1st "aliens" to enter this dimension werent technically "aliens". They were Inter-dimensional entities known as "The Annunaki"

    The Annunaki (Bird humanoids and Lion Humanoids) came from the upper dimension (with others) and designed this universe and the 1st intelligent life here (Reptilians and Lyran Humans).

    The Annunaki may be the alternate versions of us (meaning our highly developed selves from another dimension).

    Works perfectly with Multiverse Theory.

  • @buffboynick why wouldnt enough small mutations in a species cause evolution? if you split one species in half and provide different environmental pressures for say a BILLION years, their reproductive mechanisms slowly change, physiological and physical features adapt to their different environments. this is evolution. the missing link in human evolution may be due to genetic engineering, but what about every other species? if they didnt evolve from common ancestors, then please explain good sir

  • @buffboynick

    But who created the aliens that created us? Another alien? XD

  • @wowblackrock

    According to contactees (like Alex Collier) the 1st life in this 3rd dimension came from a higher dimension

    The most ancient alien race refers to those higher dimensional beings as "The Founders", since they Founded this universe

    It ties in with String Theory (many universes, many dimensions) and an "infinite causality loop"

    These other dimensional beings may in fact be the alternate versions of ourselves. For them, making this dimension is like you drawing a 2D image on paper

  • @buffboynick Euhm, mutations in our genetic material IS evolution. There is nothing religious about the evolutiontheorie ... ;)

  • @Amavideomaker

    Mutations never cause radical transformation/metamorphosis of both sexes of a pre-existing species causing them to become a new species

    That's one of the numerous flaws of traditional Darwinian evolution. That's why guys like Dr Rhawn Joseph and Dr. Michael Denton have come up with new kinds of intelligent evolution theories.

    However, they are incorrect as well. Directed Panspermia (Dr. Crick's theory) and Exogenic engineering mop the floor with creationism and evolution

  • Comment removed

  • I play music and so duplicate me mentally

    ...anyone that wants to experience...

    A literal combination

    of STAR WARS - STAR TREK - ASIMOV FOUNDATION...

    ... anyone heard that before?

    Mutating universe, universal mutant.

    Audible creationism to enjoy.

  • Bullshit GOD made us

  • @chiguy105 youra fukin idiot lol

  • Trial and error

  • hurry up 100th monkey

  • this outceeds any fictional bible story or "monkey evolution thoery" i want some1 to make full length doco about it!!

  • If they matched 2 cromosomes of 48 together, doesn't you then have 47 cromosomes? :D Otherwise far better explanation than our science or crurch, and the most logical explanation is probably the right one.

  • @voltaspeeder17 it's called "fuzzy math", and it's now the second video i've seen him do it in.

  • @voltaspeeder17 no fuse 2 pairs of chromosomes to make 23 pairs of chromosomes not 24 pairs

  • @rjhill95 - I missed, that Abu Anaki sopose to have 46 chromosomes, which means 23 sexual chr., and primates have 48 chromosomes, which means 24 for reproduction. If we fuse 2 pairs of chromosomes, we get 46 chromosome genom, which fits ours :)

  • Fourth Kind 

  • Disclosure project.

  • Mr. Lloyd Pye here has severely misunderstood; we are not, i repeat NOT, descendants of chimps. However, we have a common ancestor, which means chimps and humans are two — probably of many — branches of an earlier ancestor. Genetically we need not look like them, but share certain attributes that can be traced back to this common ancestor for us to be related.

    — Mind you that I do have an open mind toward the subject of ancient alien theory.

  • @CasperBHansen I think we are half Earth primate and half alien. That would still explain how we are similar to primates yet have the splicing and fusions of chromosomes, not to mention (I believe) 223 genes that are not found in any other life. Check out his latest interview on the StarChild Skull, it's a must watch. I'm not sure how much you have looked into ancient alien theory, but I'm convinced that it's no longer a theory. Check out my uploads and channel if you're interested.

  • @dwhite1up Any theory is theory until proven to be either false or true — so you cannot say that it is no longer a theory, simply because no tangible evidence has been found yet. I do follow the series by History Channel, I find it fascinating, and the mysteries are intriguing, but I remain skeptical toward it as long as no tangible evidence is provided. That being said, if I should subscribe to any theory, that would be the one — for the sole reason that I find it interesting.

  • @CasperBHansen But you do find it convincing... yes? I'm just saying that there is tons of data out there on it, and now we have DNA results of a skull that is shaped like an alien gray.... The one thing that is a FACT, is that people have always seen and recorded flying objects in the sky, long before the invention of the airplane and encounters with "Gods".... that speaks pretty loud to me.

  • @dwhite1up I do not use that term. Convincing is for people who have faith or beliefs. I stand by the scientific method, I will listen to a theory and I will look at the evidence, and until such time as tangible or conclusive evidence turns up, it will remain a theory. I do find the theory fascinating, as I said, but nothing more than that.

  • @CasperBHansen Yes! The scientific method is the best way to go about it.... and this is the most obvious result or conclusion, when you've seen most of what there is to see. At least you are open minded. Peace.

  • @dwhite1up Indeed, but you don't seem to have investigated this evidence yourself. It seems you are trying to convince me or advocate the theory. Let me tell you something "funny"; I contacted Nick Ciske, the guy from the series who supposedly translated some binary message and asked that he share his research on the matter. He refused to do so and claimed the producers had asked him not to share. — Remember to think, don't just take everything as fact, these guys are there for profit as well.

  • @CasperBHansen I can agree with that. The movie Fourth Kind is a great example of that.

  • @dwhite1up the fourth was a mind blowing movie(not my mind though).actual footage of ufo on the dash cam,recordings of sumarian dialect being spoken.the hypnotic regression vid looked like he was levitating.the eye wittness testamony.i don,t know what people want for evidence.

  • @edmoochie For some people there is no amount of evidence that would convince them, they will write if off as a hoax or a misunderstanding every single time, while they accept anything else, as long as it coincides with their own beliefs. Many people have been taught from cradle to grave to ignore and laugh at anything that is out of the "norm". The fact that there really are some hoaxes and misunderstandings out there is what makes if hard for some people to see. They will never see the rest...

  • @dwhite1up I agree. But the biggest evidence that we were genetically created is the fact that humans stick out like a sore thumb compared to the other creatures of the earth. A complex creature like a human should be evidence enough for people to realize that the evolution theory does not apply to us. A creature like us does not happen within a span of a few hundred thousand years....why were there no advanced beings on earth during the time of the dinosaurs?

  • @Bullsfan2008DR I say the biggest evidence is common sense. If we evolved from a "common ancestor", then what did the first human born breed with? It would only have non-humans (apes) to breed with, and thus would not produce another pure human. When you cross a donkey and a horse it produces a mule which is always sterile. A human born in a world of apes would not survive, nor could it reproduce. Even if it could, it would just make another "species". The debunking goes much farther....

  • @edmoochie i hear you man!! this guys ready to DNA test the star chikd skull that will prove it is a partly not human! and peole are calling it a hoax! they would rather believe the powers that be on this planet (government, religion, educational system) that have been totaly and undeniably been caught lying to them! i think its arrogance honestly. the refusal to admit your wrong or have been lied to i guess

  • This is the real creationism...

    And its at least semi-scientific

    In fact was it not Francis Crick the discoverer of DNA that first came up with Alien origin theory?

    Mix that with Sumerian Archeology only found less than 100 years ago and its at least an interesting theory...

  • We were geneticaly manipuleted by a more developed civilization to accommodate spirits that were considered undeveloped by this civilization and were holding down their progress. Earth was a wild planet and none of the species living here were able to receive those spirits. Genes of terrestrial species were manipulated and here we are. Soon we will have to do the same.

  • Chromossomic fusions ( Robertsonian translocations for example) are common citogenetic processes and are not considered odd or magical. I am open minded, but this guys is definitively biased...

  • this dudes been smokin some crack

  • Some things just make no sense about what we have been informed of our past, past technologies. Example: Explain the massive South American ground carvings thousands of years ago, that can only be made sense of,from high altitudes, which are supported with written documentation of flight, from

  • Mais Informações, links, sites, blogs e documentarios sobre a Ancient Aliens Theory e outras reflexões de estudiosos sobre mistérios e fenômenos que ainda não conseguimos compreender : twitter @alienastronauta

    More info, links, sites, blogs and documentaries about the Ancient Aliens Theory and more, go to : twitter @alienastronauta

  • (((_{-_-}_))) maybe zackaria sitchin is right, oh boy, ill be up all night on this one, watching Zack videos and drinking coffee, thanks allot Mr first im going to check out bikini1212 s channel, maybe there will be some girls with, oh never mind, some videos, thats it, video about genetic manipaltion, if this stuff is true, does this mean God is even more than what we seem to think he is?yes, HOLY CREATOR, if we identify him, we die,we cant id him, we shouldnt give him a name then, right?

  • (((_{-_-}_))) W dot T dot F dot ??? i guess his going to prove that the anunnaki made the father the son and the holy spirit next ! well i really dot know for sure, thats for sure, but i know know one thing and thats is, if you dont know something 100% get the holy spirit figure it out for you(me)! because it could be spiritual suicide to listen to one of this "all knowing" people, so research, study, research, and then let the holy spirit work it out for you, thats why the holy spirit is here

  • The Bible and the Book of Enoch refer to the fallen angels coming down to earth and taking human women as wives who gave birth to Nephilim. Fortunately, God destroyed that mess with the flood of Noah.

  • @johnthreesixteen316 not all of them

  • We orginates from space becaus we live in it,we die in it.

    We humans have lost all our history about who we are and why we are existing.

    But their is clearly evidence under our feets that we been digging up and its all about space.

  • So, if the evolution theory is correct, this means that evolution is still going on and some time in the distant future, some of the gorillas will turn into humans? As a matter of fact, doesn't it mean that most primates are actually "humans in the making"? That's creepy!:)

  • @mariuslupercus "that's creepy!" and that's also why evolution is not how we became to be how we are today. really, i think if man was gonna evolve, we would have done it by now (through nature) man as we are, have been this way for thousands of years...wheres the change(evolution). 

  • @mariuslupercus -- You seem to not understand evolution and DNA. Gorilla's are modern creatures like us, they will not evolve into humans. They evolved into gorilla's. We share a common ancestry, that's all. We share a common ancestry with most animals (when you compare DNA), but most recent with the great apes.

  • @mariuslupercus Evolution is a myth. It only works within a species to explain differences within a species. There has never ever been one shred of evdence that one species 'transforms' into another. There are no transitional animals. If evloution were real, you'd see a stream of creatures with slight variations blending  into each other. Evolution is a myth.

  • @c1zx "If evloution were real, you'd see a stream of creatures with slight variations blending into each other" well, you actually do see this if you look at monkeys, bears, fish, snakes and arachnids .. for example, spiders have the same anatomy .. but they have slight differences depending on how they hunt, what they eat and what environment surrounds them, like the the goliath bird eating spider is larger than other spiders because it preys on larger animals(birds)

  • @BazzDolan I'm sorry but I don't see this slow evolution, instead it looks like leaps and bounds. Quite frankly,I'm beginning to think evolution occurs in discrete steps, with nothing in between. (from species to species - not within a species). Because evolution is not a true science - with demonstrable evidence that can be repeated in a lab, I don't think it should be taught outside of philosophy.

  • @c1zx obviously u dont see this slow evolution because it happens over millions of years :S and it only looks like leaps and bounds because we dont know absolutely everything about evolution there is still alot more to find out, and modern dogs is species within a species ...

  • @BazzDolan Thanks for your comments. I realize now that this subject is really controversial, I see good arguments pro and con. I think the science is just too young to make any concrete conclusions, so I've decided to withdraw my interest in evolution, as although I know it's popular in the mainstream, there are a lot of tributaries that lead nowhere. When people state something as FACT, I'm just going to nod and smile, since really, people are willing to die over this LOL.

  • @c1zx Ive noticed this aswel, i can argue till my face is blue but at the end of the day .. no matter how much of it seems common sense, u cant change anybodys mind (even though i would happily burn for an infinity to prove gods non-existance lol) either way we cant realy disprove god .. or evolution, we all need to look deeper for answers instead of arguing about the ones we do have

  • @BazzDolan Yes absolutely. I'm actually hoping a new theory arises where everyone is happy. Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but when people realize that this is not going to turn out to be a simple model - with advances in genetics, I think the complexity might allow different beliefs to be entertained while observing the same phenomena. Why not? Anyway, I'm excited about the genome project but I can already see that that is becoming a big black box LOL.

  • @BazzDolan You're missing something sir. If evolution is correct? Which I doubt. Explain how they found a hammer; projected to be almost a million years old; completely petrified in stone.Yeah! With a wooden handle. Google, " Max Igan". There you will see some very interesting topics.

  • @JakeJudd28 lol i typed "Max Igan" into google and one thing came up about a civilisation a million years ago ... why hasnt there been any hype or documentarys, or news reports about these unexplained findings ? ... oh wait, cuz its a load of bulllshit my friend!

  • What an idiot

  • We clearly evolved here, show me a couple of genes that are clearly not shared by any other mammal on the planet, and perhaps we can give you some credence

  • @Krondool See Star child DNA results 2010. Lloyd Pye.

  • @Krondool

    Okay

    Rh Negative Blood (ONLY found in HUMANS and no terrestrial explanation for it)

    I'm guessing you're another ev-LIE-utionist lol. Where is your "shared ancestor" (CHLCA as science calls it)???

    Is he hiding with a unicorn? lol

  • if thats true i'm so pissed,lol like com on rip a lion apart one on one seriously got screwed over

  • it's more believable than Scientology.....

  • crazy fuker

  • intergalactic bestiality.....hmmmm....somebo­dy call Larry Flint!

  • Evidence this up backs it up We been lied too by Governments. Who supports Fake Wars , Fake Religions, Fake History , Suppressing of knowledge, 200 yrs of Slavery, Women not equal, etc. The Government and its sad the Skeptics are still believing in that Crap! This is Backed by Evidence they had them Tablets before Religion and the First Man Evidence comes from Africa!! We all need to discover who or What we Really are ? ..And Even in the Bible its Says Gods exactly what Sumerians said

  • Can you say, "delusional"?

  • Is there one single educated soul posting on this?

  • although there are many facts here, you have overlooked the possibility that god made us and the nephilim are the offspring of the 3rd of angels that fell with hasatan.

  • ''IF we desended from chimps"

    No, we didn't. Evolution says we share a common ancestor with chimps. We are a species of ape. We are still mammals, like a mouse, yes we share a lot of DNA. We had a common ancestor with the mouse, the first mammal.

    I can't type as fast as he bull shits.

  • Pigs also have human DNA in them, and Jews know this.

  • cool theories. can anyone offer a theory as to why white people are so utterly malignant towards, not only themselves, but to every other kind of people? their malignance has been so consistent and long-standing that there HAS to be a genetic component involved. maybe white people have draconian genetics, which is why they want to own, destroy, control (very poorly, at that), consume and oppress just about every thing on this planet.

  • Scary stupid