@debzeppeliniv You mention Stalin's attrocities over Russian people and then say "Screw Russians." Thats a bit ignorant of you. First of all, Stalin wasnt Russian. He was Georgian. And secondly if Russians suffered under his rule then why screw them? Werent they screwed enough already? Also, I dnt know where you got the 30 million figure. USSR WW2 casulaties were around 30 million but most of those were killed by Germans. Stalin purges claimed up to 7 mil lives which is a lot but not 30.
@power635 I wouldnt say not ready. I read a lot about the state of Nazi army and they had some major logistics problems. Also, their mechanized units werent as strong as they shouldve been due to them rushing the invasion of Russia. But overall no other army was even close to their level of skill, technology and fire power in 1941. Attacking Russia was a big gamble that didnt pay off in the end. But things couldve gone differently if Hitler woulda let his generals do their job.
Stalin was a peasant, uneducated, murderer human lives meant nothing to him, of course the Red Army chose to fight, because that way they at least had a chance to live. Stalin wanted other countries to enslave after the war. That history is documented. He also killed more people than Hitler 30,000,000 HIS OWN PEOPLE. SCREW Russia.
verxint, mechanized warfare was developed simultaneously in both Germany and the USSR, the latter as a natural evolution of mobile cavalry operations. Look up Marshal Tukhachevsky (victim of purges). Due to various logistical and command constraints (purges, fuel shortages, etc), the USSR did not field a mech-mobile force at the start of the war. By the end of the war the Soviets were far more skilled in mechanized warfare, particularly on the larger, ie operational and strategic, dimensions.
That is pretty much true as Germany perfected mechanized warfare and the Russians went with urban and guerrilla warfare to beat them after initially failing to beat the Nazis at their own game. Russians had some idea about mechanized and airborne warfare in the 1930's, but they never developed it or perfected it. Hitler was clueless about the effect of weather on his blitz krieg tactics or the need for urban warfare. Russian tactics in the war were just to overwhelm the enemy with numbers.
@MRobert21 you are boring the people with your stupid comments russian tactics were brilliant as you see in the Operation Bagration! btw the red army dont need paratroopers! they have vast numbers of Partisans already in the back of the german army.
i think the real tactics used by russia was "Not 1 step back", "Get out there and dont come back till there all dead" and "overwhelming numbers with severe causalities", oh come on how did you think they were able to loose 10 million soliers
Look close at 1:32 until 1:34. In the middle of the screem u see a german solider falling. On e fo the very few german fotages u see german soliders been shot.
@debzeppeliniv You mention Stalin's attrocities over Russian people and then say "Screw Russians." Thats a bit ignorant of you. First of all, Stalin wasnt Russian. He was Georgian. And secondly if Russians suffered under his rule then why screw them? Werent they screwed enough already? Also, I dnt know where you got the 30 million figure. USSR WW2 casulaties were around 30 million but most of those were killed by Germans. Stalin purges claimed up to 7 mil lives which is a lot but not 30.
dmacid 6 months ago
Heh, war propaganda.
Were building an army my ass.
They already had one, THAT WOULD HAVE CONQUERED THE WORLD IF NAZIS HADNT ATTACKED!
You people should read Viktor Suvorovs book "suicide". It explained how the nazis were completely not ready for war.
power635 10 months ago
@power635 I wouldnt say not ready. I read a lot about the state of Nazi army and they had some major logistics problems. Also, their mechanized units werent as strong as they shouldve been due to them rushing the invasion of Russia. But overall no other army was even close to their level of skill, technology and fire power in 1941. Attacking Russia was a big gamble that didnt pay off in the end. But things couldve gone differently if Hitler woulda let his generals do their job.
dmacid 6 months ago
Heh, war propaganda.
Were building an army my ass.
They already had one, THAT WOULD HAVE CONQUERED THE WORLD IF NAZIS HADNT ATTACKED!
power635 10 months ago
WHAT ARE THE RUSSIAN SONGS?!?!
DracoMalfoy87 1 year ago
wats trhe russian march song at :40?
Sniper77799 1 year ago
I want to know what it is too. Let me know if you find out
DracoMalfoy87 1 year ago
Hitler realy loved using his hands for dramatic effect.
disradiance 1 year ago
Stalin was a peasant, uneducated, murderer human lives meant nothing to him, of course the Red Army chose to fight, because that way they at least had a chance to live. Stalin wanted other countries to enslave after the war. That history is documented. He also killed more people than Hitler 30,000,000 HIS OWN PEOPLE. SCREW Russia.
debzeppeliniv 1 year ago
@debzeppeliniv Stalin saved your ass moron. dont bore the people with your stupid lies noone wants to hear.
CarstenOepping 1 year ago
Comment removed
pastrychef1985 2 years ago
verxint, mechanized warfare was developed simultaneously in both Germany and the USSR, the latter as a natural evolution of mobile cavalry operations. Look up Marshal Tukhachevsky (victim of purges). Due to various logistical and command constraints (purges, fuel shortages, etc), the USSR did not field a mech-mobile force at the start of the war. By the end of the war the Soviets were far more skilled in mechanized warfare, particularly on the larger, ie operational and strategic, dimensions.
megakedar 2 years ago 5
So.. Germany invented mechanized warfare, and Russia countered it with urban warfare?
verxintRising 3 years ago
That is pretty much true as Germany perfected mechanized warfare and the Russians went with urban and guerrilla warfare to beat them after initially failing to beat the Nazis at their own game. Russians had some idea about mechanized and airborne warfare in the 1930's, but they never developed it or perfected it. Hitler was clueless about the effect of weather on his blitz krieg tactics or the need for urban warfare. Russian tactics in the war were just to overwhelm the enemy with numbers.
MRobert21 2 years ago
@MRobert21 you are boring the people with your stupid comments russian tactics were brilliant as you see in the Operation Bagration! btw the red army dont need paratroopers! they have vast numbers of Partisans already in the back of the german army.
CarstenOepping 2 years ago
Bitches don't know about my Russian winters.
verxintRising 3 years ago 11
i think the real tactics used by russia was "Not 1 step back", "Get out there and dont come back till there all dead" and "overwhelming numbers with severe causalities", oh come on how did you think they were able to loose 10 million soliers
jetdude101 3 years ago
(Not counting civilians)
Russians lost 9 mil soldiers.
Germans lost some 7mil men.
So "severe" casualties are kinda... strange. Severe compared to English 300 000 soldiers dead or what?
mograf1 3 years ago
i have this video
hallnoats4ever 3 years ago
buen video
Racanishus 3 years ago
Look close at 1:32 until 1:34. In the middle of the screem u see a german solider falling. On e fo the very few german fotages u see german soliders been shot.
JSLegoMaster 3 years ago 2
Our allies...guess it sort of changed right after the war.
PeterMayer 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yes. Propaganda shit without telling the real tactics.
somnamnaa 3 years ago
this is cool shit
wwwgotristancom 3 years ago 2